Connect with us

Crypto World

Bithumb Error Sends Bitcoin Crashing 10% After 2,000 BTC Airdrop

Published

on

BTC/KRW Price Performance

South Korea’s cryptocurrency exchange Bithumb faced a major operational mishap on February 6, 2026, which quickly sent the BTC/KRW trading pair down by double digits.

It brings to mind past controversies about the exchange, including incidents of partial liability in data leaks.

Sponsored

Sponsored

Advertisement

Bithumb’s Accidental 2,000 BTC Airdrop Sparks 10% Bitcoin Crash on Exchange

Reportedly, a staff member accidentally sent 2,000 Bitcoin (BTC) to hundreds of users instead of the intended 2,000 Korean Won (KRW) reward.

The error triggered an immediate wave of sell-offs, sending Bitcoin’s price on the exchange more than 10% below global market rates.

BTC/KRW Price Performance
BTC/KRW Price Performance. Source: TradingView

Dumpster DAO core member Definalist first reported the incident, citing a routine airdrop meant as a small incentive for platform users.

Amidst the chaos, some users reportedly benefited significantly from the mistake, selling their unexpected Bitcoin windfall at market prices.

The accidental BTC distribution has raised questions about internal controls and risk management at crypto exchanges, particularly those handling high-value digital assets.

Sponsored

Sponsored

“Crazy to think that exchanges can still do paper trading like this, even in 2026 lmao,” remarked Definalist.

Notably, however, the Bitcoin price crash was largely confined to Bithumb due to the exchange’s isolated order book. Users sold massive amounts of BTC directly on Bithumb, overwhelming its liquidity and causing a 10% local drop.

Advertisement

Other exchanges remained unaffected because the selling pressure didn’t enter their markets, and global arbitrage mechanisms hadn’t yet adjusted the discrepancy, keeping the impact largely contained.

BTC/KRW vs BTC/USDT on Binance and Coinbase
BTC/KRW vs BTC/USDT on Binance and Coinbase. Source: TradingView

Notwithstanding, the incident highlights the operational risks that can persist even in major exchanges, despite years of industry maturation. It also shows how a simple input error can cascade into substantial market disruption.

Sponsored

Sponsored

Bithumb did not immediately respond to BeInCrypto’s request for comment and has not yet released an official public statement on corrective measures.

Advertisement

Still, the event could influence market confidence in the short term, particularly on exchanges where operational errors have immediate price consequences.

Bithumb’s Operational History and Corporate Changes Highlight Ongoing Risks

Bithumb itself has a checkered history with security and operational issues. In 2017, a data breach exposed customer information, and in a 2020 ruling, local media reported that the exchange was found partially liable in one case in which a user lost $27,200.

The court ruled that, although Bithumb’s database had been accessed, the claimants should have recognized the scam attempts and awarded only $5,000 in damages.

Sponsored

Advertisement

Sponsored

Other claims were dismissed because the court found the private information could have been obtained elsewhere.

Bithumb has also undergone significant corporate changes in recent years. In 2018, the exchange sold a 50% stake to BK Global Consortium, a group led by startup investor Kim Byung-gun, who was already the company’s fifth-largest shareholder.

This acquisition came amid a broader contraction in the crypto sector investment. According to FinTech Global research, global crypto investments peaked at $7.62 billion in 2018 before falling to $3.11 billion in 2019. In the first half of 2020 alone, the sector raised just $578.2 million.

Advertisement

This latest mishap adds to Bithumb’s long history of operational challenges, reinforcing the view that while crypto adoption is growing, the sector remains vulnerable to human and technical errors, even in leading exchanges.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Crypto World

Bitcoin gets slashed in half. What’s behind the crypto’s existential crisis

Published

on

hide content

Bitcoin tumbled toward $60,000 this week as investors reassessed its utility. And while there isn’t one clear catalyst driving the bloodbath, one thing is clear: the crypto market is in crisis. 

“There’s nothing going on in the marketplace that should have necessitated this type of a crash,” Anthony Scaramucci, founder and managing partner of alternative investment firm SkyBridge, told CNBC. “And so I think that’s made people, frankly, more fearful. … You have to ask yourself, ‘is it over for bitcoin?’”

Bitcoin fell as low as $60,062 on Thursday, bringing it to its lowest level since Oct. 11, 2024. That’s more than 52% off from its record high of $126,000 hit in early October 2025.  

Advertisement

The previous session marked one of bitcoin’s bloodiest ever, with the token shedding more than 15% on the day. Its daily relative strength index fell to 18, putting the asset in extremely oversold territory. As of Thursday, other digital assets like ether and solana were also down 24%  and 26% for the week to date, respectively — a sign investors’ confidence in the entire crypto market is faltering.

Bitcoin bounces, but losses loom large

Bitcoin was rebounding on Friday, with the token last trading at $69,631.97, up more than 9% on the day.

But, its recent drawdown has prompted investors to re-evaluate its utility, including its role as a digital currency or as a store of value. Simultaneously, institutional appetite for the flagship crypto appears to be waning as spot bitcoin exchange-traded funds record outsized outflows, threatening to drive bitcoin deeper into the red. 

“This time is markedly different from other bear markets, however, in that it’s not in response to a structural blowup,” Jasper De Maere, desk strategist at crypto market-making firm Wintermute, said in a statement shared with CNBC. “It’s a fundamentally macro-driven deleveraging tied to positioning, risk appetite and narratives rather than systemic failures within crypto itself.”

Advertisement
Stock Chart IconStock chart icon
hide content

Bitcoin prices over the past year

Over the past few months, investors have grown increasingly skeptical of efforts to recast bitcoin as “digital gold,” or an alternative to traditional safe havens such as gold. Bitcoin is down 28% over the past 12 months, while gold is up 72% during the same period — a testament to the latter’s utility as a hedge against macro risks.

Conversely, bitcoin has often traded down alongside other risk-on assets such as equities amid periods of high macroeconomic and geopolitical uncertainty, raising doubts about its utility as a safe haven. Nearly a week after Trump’s “liberation day” tariff announcement on April 2, 2025, bitcoin had fallen about 10% to below $80,000, while the S&P 500 had declined roughly 4%. 

Advertisement

Separately, investors are also reassessing the extent to which financial institutions, treasury firms and governments are willing to adopt bitcoin — a major catalyst for the token in recent years. 

Large institutional outflows are mounting as investors brace for bitcoin to go lower, thinning liquidity for the token, according to a recent analyst note from Deutsche Bank.

Those outflows are also noticeable among spot bitcoin ETFs in recent months, according to the investment firm. The funds have seen outflows of more than $3 billion in January, in addition to roughly $2 billion last December and about $7 billion last November.

Additionally, a swath of Strategy copy-cats that emerged over the past year or so have slowed or paused their bitcoin purchases amid the digital asset’s correction.

Advertisement

Finally, traders have acknowledged that long-time efforts to market bitcoin as an alternative to fiat currencies have largely faded. While Steak ‘n Shake and Compass Coffee have rolled out support for bitcoin payments in recent years, initiatives to make the asset a form of payment have largely died, particularly as interest in dollar-pegged stablecoins grows, according to Bitwise’s Ryan Rasmussen. 

“We’re seeing Wall Street adopt stablecoins because it is a fundamental transformation of the way payments work, and bitcoin is just a different asset. It’s not meant for that today,” Rasmussen said, arguing that the token’s purpose has evolved from that of a currency to a decentralized, non-governable store of value. “I’ve never paid for coffee or a sandwich with Bitcoin, and I never will.”

And beyond those more immediate concerns, investors are also increasingly worried that bitcoin’s underlying network could be hacked, driving the token to zero. 

“It certainly is a risk that is seeing more attention from investors as they’re getting more worried about [it], and I think you’re seeing a little bit of that risk priced into bitcoin,” Rasmussen said.

Advertisement

He noted that Bitwise has allocated funds toward efforts to mitigate the threat from quantum computing.

Nevertheless, traders’ appetite for bitcoin has largely dwindled, denting its price. That’s true even as long-time believers are still proudly betting on bitcoin, despite of the charts and the naysayers. 

“I believe that the story is intact,” said Scaramucci, adding that he bought bitcoin for his fund on Thursday. “But, I don’t have a crystal ball. … Who the hell knows.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

PBOC Officially Bans ‘Unapproved’ Yuan-Pegged Stablecoins

Published

on

China, Yuan, Peoples Bank of China, Stablecoin, CBDC

The People’s Bank of China (PBOC), the country’s central bank, and seven Chinese regulatory agencies published a joint statement on Friday banning the unapproved issuance of Renminbi-pegged stablecoins and tokenized real-world assets (RWAs).

The ban applies to both domestic and foreign stablecoin and tokenized RWA issuers, according to the statement, which was also signed by the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology and China’s Securities Regulatory Commission. A translation of the announcement said:

“Stablecoins pegged to fiat currencies perform some of the functions of fiat currencies in disguise during circulation and use. No unit or individual at home or abroad may issue RMB-linked stablecoins without the consent of relevant departments.”

Winston Ma, an adjunct professor at New York University (NYU) Law School and former Managing Director of CIC, China’s sovereign wealth fund, told Cointelegraph that the ban extends to the onshore and offshore versions of China’s Renminbi, also called the yuan.