Canada’s privacy-focused messaging app Signal has signaled it may exit the Canadian market if compelled to comply with Bill C-22, the government’s proposed lawful access legislation. The draft bill would require electronic service providers to build surveillance capabilities and retain certain user metadata for up to a year, underscoring a key policy tension between national security objectives and strong end-to-end encryption.

In an interview with The Globe and Mail, Signal’s vice president of strategy and global affairs, Udbhav Tiwari, warned that the bill could threaten encryption and leave private messaging services more vulnerable to cyberattacks. Bill C-22 was introduced in March as part of a broader regulatory package intended to aid law enforcement investigations into crimes such as terrorism and child exploitation.

The debate has drawn criticism from privacy advocates and mirrors wider concerns within the European Union around encryption and compelled access. Critics point to potential privacy trade-offs and the risk of creating exploitable weaknesses in communications platforms. On social media, Canadian Conservative Party MP Jacob Mantle argued that many MPs rely on Signal for safety and privacy, contending that the bill would allow the government to read messages and undermine trust in private communications.

Tiwari said Signal would “rather pull out of the country” than compromise on the privacy promises it has made to users. He warned that the proposal could enable hackers to exploit built-in vulnerabilities in electronic systems, turning private messaging services into possible targets for foreign adversaries.

The bill remains pending and is not law yet; committee hearings began on May 7 and are ongoing as part of the legislative process. Meanwhile, tech platforms have offered mixed reactions. Meta Platforms welcomed certain aspects of Bill C-22, noting that it would give law enforcement a framework to obtain critical evidence and protect public safety, while also raising concerns that some provisions could affect Canadians’ privacy and cybersecurity.

Windscribe, a privacy-focused VPN provider, joined Signal in signaling concern. In a post responding to The Globe and Mail, Windscribe said it would follow Signal’s potential move out of Canada, arguing that the law would require the logging of identifying user data and stifle privacy protections. The company criticized the current text as incompatible with its focus on user privacy and warned that headquarters in Canada could face direct regulatory pressures and higher operating costs if the bill passes.

Cointelegraph reached out to Signal for comment and will update the article if the company provides a response. The broader policy discussion surrounding Bill C-22 sits within a wider, global debate over how to balance law enforcement access with robust encryption and privacy protections. Observers note that the Canadian process could influence how privacy tech firms operate in Canada and how cross-border services approach compliance obligations in a jurisdiction that contemplates sweeping data-retention and access requirements.

Key takeaways

• Bill C-22 would compel electronic service providers to enable lawful-access capabilities and retain certain user metadata for up to one year, shaping how digital communications can be monitored by authorities.
• Signal has threatened to exit Canada rather than compromise on encryption and user privacy, highlighting potential operational and strategic shifts for privacy-centric services in regulated markets.
• Windscribe’s response indicates that a similar trajectory could affect VPN providers and other privacy tools, with possible implications for data logging and local data retention obligations.
• The bill is not law yet; parliamentary committee hearings began May 7 and are ongoing, leaving significant regulatory uncertainty for industry and users.
• Industry responses are divided: some tech platforms support enhanced law-enforcement access, while others warn of privacy and cybersecurity risks and potential compliance burdens for global services.

Bill C-22: Scope, process, and practical implications

Bill C-22 is positioned as part of Canada’s effort to equip law enforcement with timely and effective tools to investigate serious crimes. If enacted, electronic service providers would be required to design and deploy technical capabilities that enable lawful access to communications and to retain relevant user metadata for an extended period. The stated objective is to bolster investigations into terrorism and child exploitation, among other offenses. However, the proposal raises practical questions for platform operators, particularly around how to preserve security and privacy while meeting new obligations.

From a regulatory compliance perspective, the bill would introduce new obligations that could influence licensing, oversight, and ongoing conformity assessments for digital service providers operating in Canada. For financial institutions and crypto firms with Canadian operations, the framework could intersect with AML/KYC expectations and cross-border data handling requirements, prompting reassessment of data localization, incident response, and vendor management practices.

Encryption, privacy, and security tensions in a global context

The proposal sits at the center of a broader policy discourse about encryption integrity and lawful access. Signal’s public stance reflects a principled commitment to end-to-end encryption and privacy architecture, arguing that mandated backdoors or scan capabilities can introduce systemic risks and create vulnerability windows that adversaries might exploit. The debate resonates with discussions in the European Union around proposals that would enable scanning and data access at the client side, which have faced stiff opposition on privacy and security grounds. The Canadian consideration therefore contributes to a larger policy milieu in which encryption remains a pivotal issue for both private sector innovation and public safety.

For institutions and market participants, the evolving stance on lawful access raises questions about cross-border operations, data-residency requirements, and the extent to which regulatory divergence may affect the resilience of communications infrastructure. While some policymakers emphasize the public-safety rationale, industry observers highlight the risk that increased monitoring capabilities could undermine trust in digital services and complicate compliance for global platforms that rely on end-to-end encryption by default.

Industry responses, oversight, and the regulatory horizon

The bill’s reception among tech platforms reflects a split between public-safety objectives and privacy protections. Meta’s public position acknowledged the potential benefits of a robust evidentiary framework for enforcement while cautioning that certain provisions could impact Canadians’ privacy and cybersecurity. The company’s stance illustrates how large platform operators may seek to balance lawful-access objectives with user protections and risk management liabilities.

Signal’s leadership has framed the regulatory proposition as a fundamental privacy issue, suggesting that complying with C-22 could compromise user trust and the core privacy guarantees it offers. In this context, market participants that rely on private communications and privacy tools – including VPN providers like Windscribe – have sounded caution about operational viability and user data practices if such mandates become law.

From a compliance and risk-management standpoint, the unfolding legislative process requires careful monitoring by legal teams, regulators, and corporate governance functions across crypto firms and fintechs. Beyond the legal text, enforcement trajectories, rulemaking, and potential transitional provisions will determine how quickly and in what form any new requirements would apply to service providers and their affiliates. The current stage of hearings means significant policy refinement remains possible, with stakeholders attempting to influence the balance between investigative efficiency and privacy protections.

According to Cointelegraph’s coverage, the Canadian debate on lawful access is part of a broader global pattern in which regulators search for a workable equilibrium between security objectives and cryptographic integrity. For institutions, this signals a continuing need to assess regulatory exposure, update privacy-by-design practices, and adjust incident-response playbooks to reflect evolving requirements across jurisdictions.

As the legislative process advances, observers should watch for the clarifications that typically accompany committee stage, including definitions of service-provider scope, retention timelines, data-minimization principles, and the specific mechanisms by which access would be authorized and audited. The outcome will influence not only Canadian privacy and security norms but also the strategic choices of international platforms operating in Canada and other similarly situated markets.

Closing perspective: The Bill C-22 debate underscores the enduring tension between privacy preservation and public-safety imperatives in the digital era. For crypto firms, messaging platforms, and privacy services, the key questions revolve around enforceability, risk exposure, and the degree to which regulatory adaptations can be reconciled with robust cryptography and user trust. The path forward will depend on legislative negotiations, regulatory guidance, and how any final law addresses both the legitimate needs of law enforcement and the protections that underpin secure, private communications.

Fundamental Background

UK GDP grew by 0.6% in the first quarter of 2026, notably above the revised 0.2% reading recorded in the fourth quarter of 2025. The main contribution came from the services sector, which expanded by 0.8%. Nevertheless, strong macroeconomic data failed to support sterling: CPI inflation accelerated to 3.3% year-on-year in March, up from 3.0% in February, mainly due to higher motor fuel prices linked to the Middle East conflict.

At its meeting on 30 April, the Bank of England kept the base rate unchanged at 3.75% in an 8–1 vote, while several MPC members signalled the possibility of further tightening should inflationary pressure persist. According to the International Monetary Fund, UK GDP growth in 2026 is expected to reach only 0.8%, representing the largest downgrade among G7 economies.

Technical Picture

From 6 April to 1 May, GBP/USD developed an upward trend supported by a rising trendline. As the pair approached the peak, price action became increasingly compressed, forming a reversal structure with a dense profile concentration in the 1.3480–1.3580 range amid growing selling pressure. After breaking below the trendline and moving outside the profile range, the pair accelerated lower.

GBP/USD is now trading below the horizontal volume zone, signalling continued seller dominance. The lower boundary of the profile, followed by the POC area at 1.3515–1.3520, serves as the nearest reference zone for buyers. If the pair regains the upper boundary of the profile at 1.3580, the next resistance level stands at 1.3650 near the trend highs.

Support around 1.3380 corresponds to the price extremes that preceded the April rally and acts as an important structural support area, which the pair has nearly reached. This limits the room for further downside within the current move.

The RSI + MAs indicator shows readings of 26, 38 and 43. The moving averages remain pointed lower, reflecting ongoing pressure. However, the RSI has already entered oversold territory, which should be taken into account.

Key Takeaways

Strong first-quarter GDP data has not eased concerns over inflation and monetary policy uncertainty, and this fundamental conflict is likely to determine the pair’s future direction. From a technical perspective, the main RSI + MAs reading has entered oversold territory, although there are still no clear signs of a reversal.

Trade over 50 forex markets 24 hours a day with FXOpen. Take advantage of low commissions, deep liquidity, and spreads from 0.0 pips (additional fees may apply). Open your FXOpen account now or learn more about trading forex with FXOpen.

This article represents the opinion of the Companies operating under the FXOpen brand only. It is not to be construed as an offer, solicitation, or recommendation with respect to products and services provided by the Companies operating under the FXOpen brand, nor is it to be considered financial advice.

BitGo has partnered with Moon Inc. to support Bitcoin-powered card products across Asia. 

The deal uses BitGo Singapore, a Monetary Authority of Singapore-regulated entity, as the infrastructure layer for Moon’s bitcoin-linked consumer card products.

Moon will start with prepaid Bitcoin gift cards. The cards are set to reach Hong Kong retail stores and Moon’s online store this month. BusinessWire said the program has already processed multiple wholesale transactions since launch.

Moon targets Hong Kong and wider Asia

Moon Inc. is listed in Hong Kong and has nearly 30 years of experience in prepaid distribution. Its business has included SIM cards and stored-value payment cards across Asia.

The company has also built a Bitcoin reserve and now plans to expand its card distribution footprint. The stated target markets include Japan, Thailand, South Korea, Taiwan and other Asian regions.

Meanwhile, Moon said it reviewed custody providers based on security architecture, API depth and scale. Moon COO Russ Jacobsen said “BitGo’s biometric multi-signature infrastructure, batch transaction capabilities, and securing billions in digital assets made them the clear choice.”

BitGo APAC head Abel Seow said Moon is integrating digital assets into consumer finance in Asia. He added that BitGo’s infrastructure is designed to support institutions as they enter their next phase of growth.

BitGo expands after Q1 revenue growth

The Moon partnership comes after BitGo reported $3.77 billion in first-quarter revenue, up 112.6% from one year earlier. The company’s net loss widened to $60.7 million, with Bitcoin treasury marks and post-IPO compensation costs weighing on results.

Market updates also show BitGo building new revenue lines. Crypto.news reported that its Stablecoin-as-a-Service revenue rose 43.6% from the prior quarter to $38.2 million, while the company also launched derivatives services during Q1.

Hong Kong payment activity grows

The deal also fits a wider push into Asia-based crypto payment infrastructure. Separate coverage noted that Kraken parent Payward agreed to buy Hong Kong-based Reap Technologies for up to $600 million, adding card issuance and stablecoin payment tools to its business platform.

BitGo has also been active in institutional custody. Crypto.news reported in April that OKX added BitGo’s Off-Exchange Settlement platform for U.S. institutional clients, allowing firms to trade while keeping assets in BitGo cold custody.

Bitget said commitments for its OpenAI-linked preOPAI sale on IPO Prime passed $100 million before the subscription window closed on May 15 at 8:00 UTC. 

The product gives eligible users exposure tied to OpenAI’s possible future public listing.

The exchange listed preOPAI as the second project on IPO Prime. Earlier crypto.news coverage said the sale opened on May 12, with preOPAI priced at $725 per token. It also noted that the product gives OpenAI-linked exposure but does not represent direct company equity.

How the preOPAI sale works

Bitget’s support page says preOPAI was issued by Republic and designed to mirror OpenAI’s economic performance after a future public listing. The product used USDT or USDGO for commitments, with a $100 minimum and a $300 million total commit cap.

The IPO Prime timeline listed May 12 to May 15 as the commitment period. Distribution was scheduled for May 15 between 8:00 UTC and 12:00 UTC, with spot trading set to start at 14:00 UTC on the same day.

Moreover, Bitget’s own guide says preOPAI is not a direct investment in OpenAI. It also says there is no legal relationship between preOPAI and OpenAI, and that OpenAI has not endorsed, approved or authorized the product.

The same guide warns that IPO Prime products carry risks. These include changes in the underlying company’s valuation, the chance that a public listing or other event does not happen, and secondary market liquidity risk.

Tokenized pre-IPO access gains attention

The preOPAI launch follows Bitget’s earlier preSPAX product linked to SpaceX. Bitget said preSPAX drew more than 13,000 subscribed users and $171 million in commitment value at the time of publication.

Market updates have also shown wider interest in tokenized real-world assets. Crypto.news reported in 2025 that Bitget and Bitget Wallet launched trading for more than 100 tokenized U.S. stocks and ETFs through Ondo, including names such as Apple, Tesla and Nvidia.

AI exposure remains the main draw

OpenAI remains one of the most watched private AI companies. Crypto.news recently reported that more than 600 OpenAI employees sold shares in a $6.6 billion secondary sale, showing strong private-market demand for AI-linked equity exposure.

The preOPAI sale now brings that demand into a crypto exchange format. The product may appeal to users seeking exposure to future AI listings, but its structure differs from owning OpenAI shares directly. That distinction remains central for investors watching the sale.

Ripple CTO Emeritus David Schwartz has explained how XRP Ledger uses the Negative Unique Node List to handle validator failures. 

The discussion followed fresh debate over XRPL’s architecture after Charles Hoskinson called the design “very elegant.”

Schwartz said XRPL needs a validator set that includes reliable operators and smaller independent participants. The issue is that large firms often have stronger uptime because they can pay for better servers and support teams.

Meanwhile, the Negative UNL is a list of trusted validators believed to be offline or not working properly. XRPL.org says the remaining validators can agree to ignore those validators when deciding whether a new ledger has enough support.

The system does not remove the validator forever. If the validator comes back online and sends matching validation votes, it can be removed from the Negative UNL after a short period.

Smaller validators keep their voice

Schwartz said the key point is that the Negative UNL does not silence a validator’s wider role. A validator placed on the list may lose its active confirmation role during an outage, but it does not lose its voice in transaction ordering, fee voting or amendment voting.

XRPL’s own documentation says a UNL is the group of validators a server trusts not to collude. It also says each UNL entry should be an independent entity, including businesses, universities, organizations or individuals.

XRPL security remains part of wider updates

The debate comes as XRPL prepares more technical upgrades. Crypto.news reported that the ecosystem is working on native lending and programmable escrow tools aimed at expanding XRPL beyond payments and settlement.

Ripple is also planning a four-phase roadmap to make XRPL more resistant to future quantum risks by 2028. The plan includes 2026 testing, validator checks, custody prototypes and a final native amendment.

XRP market activity adds attention

The validator discussion also comes during a busy period for XRP. Crypto.news reported that XRP wallets holding at least 10,000 tokens reached a record 332,230, based on Santiment data shared on X.

Separate crypto.news coverage said XRP open interest on Binance rose to about $475.4 million, above its 30-day average. The same report placed XRP near the $1.45 to $1.50 resistance area watched by traders.

Key Highlights

• Partnership with Dongfeng secures electric vehicle manufacturing for Peugeot and Jeep brands beginning 2027.
• Pre-market trading shows STLA declining despite strategic China expansion announcement.
• Wuhan-based production facility will serve both Chinese domestic and international export markets.
• Agreement provides Stellantis enhanced access to China’s growing electric vehicle sector.
• Combined investment exceeds $1 billion for new electric Peugeot and Jeep vehicle development.

Stellantis unveiled a significant manufacturing alliance with Dongfeng Group as shares declined in early pre-market trading. This strategic partnership centers on electric vehicle production for both Peugeot and Jeep brands at Wuhan facilities beginning 2027. The collaboration represents a major step in the automaker’s push into China’s competitive electric vehicle landscape.

Strategic Alliance Builds on Decades of Cooperation

The automotive giant and Dongfeng Group formalized a strategic cooperation framework that expands their relationship spanning more than three decades. Under this arrangement, both parties will leverage shared manufacturing capabilities for Peugeot and Jeep vehicle lines throughout China. Additionally, they executed a non-binding memorandum exploring further collaborative opportunities.

This framework specifically targets Dongfeng Peugeot Citroën Automobile (DPCA). The joint venture controls the Wuhan manufacturing complex that will anchor the upcoming production initiative. Full implementation remains contingent upon finalized contracts and regulatory clearances.

The arrangement provides the European automaker an additional pathway for expansion within Chinese markets and beyond. Dongfeng contributes extensive local market knowledge, robust production infrastructure, and advanced electric powertrain technology. Both organizations seek to revitalize DPCA’s market position through this collaboration.

Electric Vehicle Manufacturing Timeline Set for 2027

DPCA will manufacture two entirely new Peugeot-branded electric vehicles at its Wuhan production complex. Manufacturing operations are scheduled to commence in 2027, pending necessary approvals and contractual finalization. These vehicles will serve both domestic Chinese consumers and carefully selected international markets.

The upcoming Peugeot models will incorporate styling elements previewed through concept vehicles displayed at the 2026 Beijing Auto Show. The automaker positions these offerings as critical components of Peugeot’s worldwide expansion strategy. Both vehicles will showcase the brand’s evolving design philosophy.

The manufacturing program additionally encompasses two Jeep-branded electric off-road vehicles. DPCA anticipates producing these models at the same Wuhan location starting 2027. The company intends to distribute these Jeep vehicles throughout worldwide markets.

Share Performance Weakens Following Announcement

STLA finished regular trading at $7.84, advancing 3.16% during the session. Nevertheless, shares retreated to $7.64 during pre-market hours. This movement represented a 2.55% pullback following an initial decline from approximately $7.75.

Stellantis N.V., STLA

The manufacturing initiative encompasses total investment exceeding 8 billion Chinese yuan. That figure translates to approximately 1 billion euros according to company calculations. The European automaker anticipates contributing roughly 130 million euros toward the overall program.

The partnership receives backing from governmental authorities in Hubei province and Wuhan city. Consequently, this initiative synchronizes with China’s comprehensive strategy promoting electric vehicle manufacturing. For the multinational automaker, this agreement reinforces its Chinese market presence while broadening its worldwide electric vehicle portfolio.

Australia’s proposed changes to capital gains tax could lead to smaller profits for cryptocurrency traders, especially low-income earners, and could discourage “patient investing,” according to several crypto executives.

The proposed reform, announced by the ruling Labor Party on Tuesday as part of its fiscal year 2027 budget, will bring in a minimum 30% tax on capital gains and scrap the 50% capital gains tax discount on assets held for more than 12 months. 

Robin Singh, CEO and founder of crypto tax platform Koinly, told Cointelegraph the proposed changes are a mixed bag: The new system “theoretically” protects investors from being taxed on purely inflationary gains, but in practice, most crypto investors will pay more tax, with low-income earners hit the hardest.

“A lower-income earner who would have paid around $3,800 under the old rules, 19% on a $20,000 discounted gain, will pay $10,200 under the new ones. That’s nearly triple. For students, part-time workers and anyone without significant other income, this is the biggest shift,” Singh added.

Many investors, particularly Gen Z and Millennials, have seen crypto as a way to create wealth and long-term financial well-being. The new tax changes could impact that notion. A 2025 report from crypto exchange Independent Reserve found that 30% of people were investing in crypto to diversify their portfolio, while 25% were trading to get rich. 

“For retail and mid-sized holders, the hodl tax incentive is effectively gone. Crypto has historically grown much faster than inflation, so the inflation adjustment doesn’t come close to offsetting the loss of the 50% discount. With no tax reward for sitting on positions, expect more frequent trading and shorter holding periods.” 

A quarter of people are trading crypto to get rich. Source: Independent Reserve

“That said, the market has always adapted. Investors will rework their strategies, advisors will rework their advice, and the dust will settle,” Singh added.

Crypto trader behavior will likely shift

Jonathon Miller, the Australian general manager for crypto exchange Kraken, agreed that the changes will make long-term crypto holding less attractive. 

Source: Crypto Tax Made Easy 

“The bigger risk is that reducing the benefit of long-term holding makes patient investing less attractive, particularly in a market where assets can be traded around the clock. That could push some investors toward shorter-term behavior, which is not necessarily the best strategy for long-term wealth building,” Miller said.

“The sector will continue to mature, but policy settings can influence whether that maturity is built around long-term confidence or shorter-term activity.”

Andrea Yuen, the co-CEO of Australian crypto trading platform Swyftx, said the tax changes could prompt crypto traders to shift to other avenues for long-term wealth creation.

“The change is likely to act as a catalyst for patient capital over the next few years. We expect a significant trend toward crypto allocations within retirement portfolios and self-managed super funds. Investors are essentially being incentivized toward structured, long-term wealth creation,” Yuen added.

Related: Coinbase launches crypto service for Australian retirement funds 

Australian crypto exchange BTC Markets reported in its Investor Study Report that SMSF registrations increased 69% year-on-year during the 2024–2025 financial year.

New CGT rules need to pass through Parliament

The Australian government has argued that the changes will curb investor appetite for property purchases because, without tax incentives, property is less attractive as an investment and that could free up supply.

The new measures will apply only to gains accrued after July 1, 2027, and new homes are exempt. Critics argue that it will instead push up housing prices, stifle investment, impact business and add pressure to the new housing supply, The Australian reported on Friday. 

The tax reforms will still need to pass through the Australian Parliament. Angus Taylor, the leader of Australia’s other major political party, the Liberals, has reportedly vowed to oppose the measures and repeal them if they form government after the next federal election in 2028.

Source: Pete Wargent 

The Labor Party will also need to get the tax reforms through the House of Representatives, with 76 votes required to pass, and through the Senate with 39 votes. Labor holds 94 seats in the House and 30 in the Senate.

Magazine: eToro founder timed Bitcoin top perfectly due to belief in 4 year cycles