Crypto World
Is Solana Price Doomed After Falling Below $100?
Solana has staged a sharp intraday recovery after recent losses pressured the price earlier this week. SOL bounced strongly as the broader crypto market added nearly $200 billion in value.
Aggressive dip buying prevented deeper losses, helping Solana stabilize and post a 12% daily gain despite lingering market uncertainty.
Solana LTHs Are Not So Bullish Yet
On-chain data shows long-term holder buying momentum is slowing. The HODLer Net Position Change has declined, indicating reduced accumulation from investors who typically support prices during downturns. This shift followed SOL’s sharp pullback over the past week, which appears to have dampened long-term conviction.
Sponsored
Sponsored
A sustained recovery depends on whether long-term holders resume accumulation. If buying momentum remains weak, Solana may struggle to build durable upside. Reduced support from this cohort limits demand absorption, increasing the risk that short-term rallies fade without broader participation from long-term investors.
Want more token insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Crypto Newsletter here.
Momentum indicators suggest selling pressure may be nearing exhaustion. The Money Flow Index is approaching the oversold threshold below 20.0. A move into this zone typically signals selling saturation, often preceding periods of stabilization or short-term rebounds in price.
Historically, Solana has entered oversold territory only three times in the past two and a half years. Each instance coincided with notable price stabilization or reversal. If the indicator slips further, it may help SOL pause its decline and attract renewed dip-buying interest from traders.
SOL Price Recovery Still Likely
Solana price is trading near $88 at the time of writing after climbing 12% in the past 24 hours. Earlier in the session, SOL dropped roughly 13% to an intraday low. Strong dip buying prevented a close near $67, highlighting active demand at lower levels.
Support from the broader market could allow SOL to push above $90 in the near term. A recovery rally would require reclaiming $100 as support. Securing that level would confirm improving momentum and open the path toward a move near $110 as confidence returns.
Downside risk persists if long-term holder selling continues. Failure to reclaim $100 could cap upside and leave SOL range-bound near $90. Under weaker conditions, the price may retreat toward $78. Such a move would invalidate the bullish thesis and extend Solana’s corrective phase.
Goldman Sachs analyst James Yaro told clients that crypto-linked equities look selectively attractive after falling 46% from their October 2025 peak.
The research note maintained Buy ratings on three names. Robinhood Markets (HOOD), Figure Technologies (FIGR), and Coinbase Global (COIN) each offer distinct upside.
Valuations Near Historical Trough Levels
Yaro noted that the current drawdown has roughly matched the average peak-to-trough decline seen in previous crypto cycles. Prices have shown volatile but stabilizing behavior over recent weeks, suggesting forced selling pressure may be easing.
“All in, we see an increasingly attractive entry point to our digital-asset sensitive coverage, albeit selectively, across the group,” a TradFi media reported, citing Yaro.
Among the three picks, Goldman cut its HOOD price target to $91 from $102 and lowered its COIN price target to $235 from $270.
However, it raised FIGR’s target to $42 from $39, implying roughly 35% upside. HOOD closed at $66.02 and COIN at $161.14 on March 28, both down sharply year to date.
Subscribe to our YouTube channel to watch leaders and journalists provide expert insights
Robinhood recently approved a $1.5 billion share buyback, signaling management confidence at current levels.
Figure Technologies, a blockchain-native lender that originated over $16 billion in on-chain home equity loans, continues to expand its capital marketplace.
Volume Risk Remains
Goldman warned that trading volumes may still dip before recovering. Yaro estimated a further slump would trim 2026 revenue by 2% and profits by 4% for these companies. Historically, trough volumes last about three months before a meaningful rebound.
The note positions the sector as oversold but not risk-free. Investors face a window where prices may have stabilized, yet volumes and volatility could still deliver sharp swings before any sustained recovery takes hold.
The post Goldman Sachs Flags 2 Crypto Stocks Worth Buying After 46% Sector Crash appeared first on BeInCrypto.
The Ethereum Foundation has accelerated its treasury staking push, deploying $46.2 million in Ether in its largest move to date after the recent BitMine sale.
On Monday, the foundation’s treasury multisignature wallet made 11 deposits into the Ethereum Beacon Deposit Contract, each of roughly 2,047 Ether (ETH), totaling 22,517 tokens worth roughly $46.2 million, according to data from Arkham Intelligence.
The Ethereum Foundation started staking ETH in February, depositing 2,016 ETH and outlining plans to stake up to 70,000 ETH, with rewards reinvested into research, ecosystem development and grants.
The foundation also deposited a smaller 31 ETH tranche earlier this month, bringing the total staked holdings to roughly 24,564 ETH as it shifts to staking to generate yield, rather than relying on periodic ETH sales, which have historically drawn criticism.
Related: Ethereum builders propose ‘economic zone’ to tackle L2 fragmentation
EF sells 5,000 ETH to BitMine in OTC deal
The new staking move comes after the EF completed an over-the-counter (OTC) sale of 5,000 Ether to BitMine Immersion Technologies, valued at about $10.2 million. The foundation said proceeds would support core operations, including protocol research, ecosystem growth and community grants.
The transaction marked the foundation’s second direct OTC sale to a corporate buyer, following a 10,000 ETH sale to SharpLink Gaming in July 2025.
The EF currently holds about $361 million in onchain assets, with the vast majority, roughly $360.8 million, held in Ether on the Ethereum network, alongside small balances across networks like Arbitrum, Optimism and Bitcoin, according to Arkham.
Related: Ethereum risks losing No. 2 spot as stablecoins gain ground
Ether price risks further decline
Ether fell below the $2,000 level over the weekend, raising the risk of a deeper correction. Analysts, including Onur, CryptoWZRD and Ted Pillows, pointed to repeated failures at $2,200 and weakening momentum, with some warning ETH could fall toward the $1,750–$1,850 range.
Demand for Ether has also turned negative, hitting its lowest level in 16 months, according to Capriole Investments.
Magazine: Ethereum’s Fusaka fork explained for dummies — What the hell is PeerDAS?
A trader pulled off a nearly 100x return on decentralized betting platform Polymarket in less than a minute, thanks to a blunder by a UFC announcer.
In Sunday’s UFC heavyweight bout, Tyrell Fortune beat Marcin Tybura to secure his first UFC victory. But the event was not without drama. Cage announcer Bruce Buffer initially read the result in favor of Tybura, a result that stood for less than a minute before Buffer corrected the mistake.
LlamaEnjoyer, a Polymarket trader, also known as Verrissimus on X, capitalized on the error, turning roughly $676 into $67,000.
When Tybura was named victor, his shares spiked toward 99 cents and Fortune’s collapsed to about 1 cent. LlamaEnjoyer said they almost placed a $100,000 bet on Tybura at 99 cents, but stopped when they realized something was awry. Instead, the trader bought $676 worth of Fortune shares at 1 cent. Seconds later, when the UFC corrected the announcement and the shares immediately jumped to $1.
“I almost bought Tybura at 99¢ with $100k. Stopped, realized something was off. Cancelled my order, scooped up 1¢ shares instead. The UFC corrected the winner seconds later. Easiest 100x ever,” Verrissimus said on X.
LlamaEnjoyer’s quick thinking illustrates how fast prediction market prices can swing during live events, especially when big announcements are misread or misreported.
The incident also raises questions about how payouts are handled when there’s an error at the “source of truth” — the reference that contracts rely on to settle outcomes. Since the error originated from the UFC announcer, there could be a dispute over payouts or contract resolution, even though the trader’s actions remain fully legitimate.
XRP price is trading at $1.36 amid renewed controversy that could rattle institutional confidence and prediction in the asset, and in the exchange that hosts much of its volume. The allegation isn’t new, but its timing is pointed.
Ripple CTO David Schwartz first raised the pay-to-list claim in 2023, and it’s back in circulation with fresh teeth. What happens next at the $1.27 support level may answer a question the chart has been asking for weeks.
Crypto commentator Pumpius reignited the dispute on X, citing Schwartz’s earlier claim that Coinbase demanded millions in listing fees before agreeing to carry XRP. According to the account, Ripple initially refused, and the asset sat off-platform until a deal was struck.
— Pumpius (@pumpius) March 29, 2026
EXPOSED: Coinbase's Greedy Gatekeeping on XRP – JoelKatz Drops the Bombshell!
Back in 2023, Ripple's CTO @JoelKatz spilled the tea on what really went down behind closed doors with @Coinbase and the $XRP listing.
Coinbase refused to list XRP. Even though it was screamingly… pic.twitter.com/crYfpUYSFF
Once listed, XRP allegedly drove approximately 20% of Coinbase’s revenue. Pumpius called it “a classic pay-to-play shakedown in the ‘decentralised’ crypto world.” At least one other X user escalated further, using the word extortion directly.
Whether the allegation is verified or an amplified rumor, the market is watching. XRP’s technical picture was already fragile before this news cycle added sentiment pressure.
Discover: The best pre-launch token sales
XRP Price Prediction: Can Ripple Hold $1.27 Support as Listing Controversy Clouds Outlook?
XRP is consolidating in a tight band between $1.32 and $1.36, flagging capitulation signals in a market that displays bearish sentiment. The near-term structure is defensive. Volume has not confirmed any directional conviction, and momentum indicators point to a market waiting.
Key levels to monitor:
- Critical support: $1.27, the 23.6% Fibonacci retracement, and the bear market floor most analysts reference
- Near-term resistance: $1.42, the 61.8% Fibonacci retracement; a confirmed close above this level would signal a structural shift
- Upper resistance zone: $1.78, with approximately 1.85 billion XRP accumulated here, creating a supply ceiling
The Coinbase allegation adds a narrative overhang that technical levels alone can’t price in. XRP’s broader price trajectory has survived worse, but the combination of weak technicals and renewed institutional distrust is a hostile setup. Price action around $1.27 in the coming sessions will be the tell.
Discover: The best crypto to diversify your portfolio with
LiquidChain With Early Mover Upside as XRP Tests Key Levels
XRP’s current ceiling problem, heavy supply at $1.76–$1.80, bearish momentum, and a controversy that won’t quiet down, illustrate a recurring dynamic in crypto: established assets attract scrutiny and structural resistance simultaneously.
LiquidChain ($LIQUID) is a Layer 3 infrastructure project positioning itself as the cross-chain liquidity layer, fusing Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana liquidity into a single execution environment. The architecture includes a Unified Liquidity Layer, Single-Step Execution, Verifiable Settlement, and a Deploy-Once Architecture that lets developers access all three ecosystems without redeployment.
A new layer emerges. Only a few see it first. — LiquidChain (@getliquidchain) March 24, 2026
The future is LiquidChain 
⟁https://t.co/vqvBcdSj94 pic.twitter.com/R7ZeZ0NPGl
The presale is currently priced at $0.0144, with more than $600K raised to date. Early-stage positioning at this price means exposure before any exchange listing dynamics, plus a 1700% APY staking rewards.
Research LiquidChain and review the presale details here.
This article is not financial advice. Crypto assets are volatile. Always conduct your own research before investing.
The post XRP Price Prediction: Coinbase vs. Ripple Allegation Resurfaced appeared first on Cryptonews.
Introduction
The rise of Web3 has sparked a wave of innovation across digital finance, identity, and online interaction. One of the most intriguing developments is SocialFi (Social Finance)—a model that merges social media with blockchain-powered financial systems.
At its core, SocialFi represents a shift in how value is created and distributed online, positioning itself as a natural extension of the broader blockchain industry.
What is SocialFi?
SocialFi combines social networking and decentralized finance (DeFi), allowing users to own, control, and monetize their social interactions.
Unlike traditional platforms, where companies profit from user data and content, SocialFi platforms allow individuals to:
- Earn tokens from content creation and engagement
- Own their digital identity and data
- Participate in governance through decentralized systems
In short, your likes, posts, and influence stop being “free labor” and start becoming financial assets.
The Role of Blockchain in SocialFi
SocialFi would not exist without blockchain. The connection between the two is fundamental and structural—not just complementary.
1. Decentralization
Blockchain removes the need for centralized platforms (like Facebook or X). Instead, SocialFi platforms operate on distributed networks where:
- No single entity controls data
- Users retain ownership of content
- Systems are resistant to censorship
This aligns with blockchain’s core philosophy of trustless, peer-to-peer systems.
2. Tokenization of Social Value
One of the most powerful contributions of blockchain to SocialFi is tokenization.
SocialFi platforms create native tokens that:
- Reward engagement (likes, shares, comments)
- Represent influence or reputation
- Enable trading of social assets (e.g., creator tokens or “keys”)
This turns social capital into financial capital, something impossible in Web2 ecosystems.
3. Smart Contracts and Automation
Blockchain-based smart contracts automate how value flows in SocialFi ecosystems:
- Creators receive instant payments
- Revenue splits happen transparently
- Rewards are distributed without intermediaries
This eliminates reliance on advertisers or platform owners and ensures fair and transparent monetization.
4. Digital Ownership via NFTs
SocialFi also leverages NFTs (non-fungible tokens) to represent:
- Content ownership
- Membership access
- Unique digital identities
This gives users provable ownership of their online presence—something traditional platforms never offered.
5. DAO Governance
Many SocialFi platforms are governed by Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs), allowing users to:
- Vote on platform changes
- Influence policies
- Shape the ecosystem’s future
This transforms users from passive participants into active stakeholders.
Why SocialFi Matters to the Blockchain Industry
SocialFi is more than just another crypto trend—it addresses one of blockchain’s biggest challenges: real-world adoption.
Bridging Web2 and Web3
SocialFi integrates familiar social media behaviors with blockchain infrastructure, making Web3 more accessible to everyday users.
Expanding Use Cases
Blockchain moves beyond finance (DeFi) into:
- Creator economies
- Community building
- Digital identity systems
Driving Network Effects
Social platforms thrive on user activity. By combining this with blockchain incentives, SocialFi creates self-reinforcing ecosystems where:
- More users → more engagement
- More engagement → more value
- More value → more adoption
Challenges Facing SocialFi
Despite its potential, SocialFi faces several hurdles:
1. Scalability
Blockchain networks can struggle with high transaction volumes, which is critical for social platforms.
2. User Experience
Managing wallets, gas fees, and keys can still feel like solving a puzzle with missing pieces.
3. Security Risks
Some developers and users have raised concerns about vulnerabilities in SocialFi platforms, especially around user data and smart contracts.
4. Regulation
Combining finance and social media raises legal questions around:
- Data privacy
- Financial compliance
- Content moderation
The Future of SocialFi in Blockchain
SocialFi represents a natural evolution of blockchain technology—from purely financial systems to human-centric digital economies.
As infrastructure improves (Layer 2 scaling, better UX, decentralized identity), SocialFi could:
- Disrupt traditional social media giants
- Create new income streams for creators
- Redefine digital ownership and community governance
In the long run, the success of SocialFi may determine whether blockchain becomes a niche financial tool—or the foundation of the next internet.
Finale
The connection between SocialFi and the blockchain industry is deeply intertwined. Blockchain provides the technology, trust, and economic framework, while SocialFi brings human interaction and cultural relevance.
Together, they form a powerful narrative:
A decentralized internet where users don’t just participate—they own, earn, and govern.
REQUEST AN ARTICLE
- TxFlow launches L1 blockchain with 250K TPS for on-chain finance.
- TxFlow DEX goes live with invite-only access and CLOB trading.
- TIP standards enable multi-app finance ecosystem on TxFlow L1.
TxFlow has announced the launch of its Layer 1 blockchain, TxFlow L1, marking the start of a multi-application on-chain finance ecosystem built around its TIP Liquidity Standards.
Alongside the mainnet launch, TxFlow DEX — a central limit order book (CLOB) decentralized exchange for perpetual trading — is now live with invitation-only access as the first application on the network.
Additional applications, referred to as “Channels,” are expected to follow, reflecting a broader vision described by the team as “the blockchain where all finance happens”.
TxFlow L1: High-performance infrastructure for multi-application finance
TxFlow L1 processes over 250,000 TPS on-chain.
Two core architectural decisions drive this performance: DAG-based parallel execution enables high transaction throughput by processing non-conflicting transactions simultaneously, while a multi-threaded pipeline with a state machine supports efficient transaction processing without bottlenecks.
This level of performance is a deliberate architectural requirement to support high-frequency, CLOB-based trading and other demanding financial use cases.
Building on this infrastructure, TIP Liquidity Standards define how applications are constructed and interact within the ecosystem.
These composable trading protocol standards allow developers to create “Channels” by combining TIP modules.
TIP1 covers spot trading, TIP2 derivatives, and TIP3 prediction markets, with additional standards expected as the ecosystem expands.
The design reflects a specific thesis: teams with deep liquidity expertise can build trading applications directly on TxFlow L1, while others can deploy Channels that access existing on-chain liquidity without building it from scratch.
TxFlow L1 is also designed with a long-term focus on AI-driven applications.
TxFlow DEX is now live: Fully on-chain CLOB
TxFlow DEX, the first Channel application on TxFlow L1, is now live with invitation-only access.
Designed as a high-performance central limit order book (CLOB) exchange for perpetual trading, the platform processes over 250,000 transactions per second with one-block finality.
All trading activity — including order placement, cancellation, matching, and liquidation — is executed and settled fully on-chain.
The launch serves as an initial demonstration of TxFlow L1’s ability to support financial applications at production scale.
At launch, the platform includes 13 perpetual markets, as well as Protocol Vaults and User Vaults for liquidity provisioning and strategy deployment. A blockchain explorer provides real-time visibility into on-chain activity.
The broader objective is to support an open ecosystem of financial applications on TxFlow L1, where Channels can interoperate, access shared liquidity, and settle transactions without intermediaries.
Access is currently invitation-only. Onboarding instructions are available at txflow.com.
About TxFlow L1
TxFlow L1 is a high-performance blockchain built for on-chain financial infrastructure, organized around TIP Liquidity Standards that define how financial products are built, composed, and settled on-chain.
TxFlow DEX is the first Channel on TxFlow L1 — a CLOB orderbook DEX for perpetual trading, processing over 250,000 TPS with one-block finality.
TxFlow L1 is designed from the ground up to be AI-native, built for a financial ecosystem where autonomous agents and human traders operate on equal footing.
No investor token allocation. Governance and ownership rest entirely with the community.
Official website: https://txflow.com/
Media contact
Gelsey Birkett
Head of PR
[email protected]
This article is authored by a third party, and CoinJournal does not endorse or take responsibility for its content, accuracy, quality, advertisements, products, or materials. Readers should independently research and exercise due diligence before making decisions related to the mentioned company.
Binance Research’s March 30 Geopolitical and Macro Pulse flagged five converging risk events that could reshape crypto positioning this week, from Middle East escalation to unresolved SEC rulings.
The report landed as the VIX climbed 13.16%, the S&P 500 dropped 1.75%, and the Nasdaq fell 1.93% in a single session, while Brent crude rose 1.19% and Ethereum (ETH) gained 0.96%.
War, Regulation, and Stalled ETF Rulings Hit at Once
USS Tripoli arrived in the Middle East on March 28 carrying 3,500 troops, according to U.S. CENTCOM.
Yemen’s Houthi rebels launched ballistic missiles at Israel the same day, marking their formal entry into the U.S.-Israel war against Iran.
Polymarket odds for a ceasefire by end-April sat at just 32%, while Hormuz Strait normalization trailed at 21%.
The CLARITY Act entered closed-door review in the Senate Banking Committee. Its latest draft bans passive yields on stablecoins, a provision that triggered sharp reactions from issuers.
Circle lost $5.6 billion in market capitalization in a single session after the text surfaced. However, the March 25 Tokenization hearing showed bipartisan support, and a late-April markup remains on the table.
The SEC let the March 27 deadline pass on 91 pending crypto ETF applications without issuing final decisions.
Bloomberg analysts still maintain high approval ratings for Ripple (XRP) and Solana (SOL). Any formal approvals or modest extensions this week warrant close attention.
Fed Chair Jerome Powell speaks today, JOLTs data drops Tuesday, and Friday’s Nonfarm Payrolls will test whether markets have priced in rising oil costs.
The buyback blackout season, affecting 45% of S&P 500 firms through late April, removes a key bid for equity.
The post Binance Research Just Dropped 5 Signals Every Crypto Trader Should Fear appeared first on BeInCrypto.
The total meme coin market capitalization has slipped to roughly $36 billion, with every major subsector posting year-to-date losses except one. Four converging signals suggest a recovery remains distant.
The first signal is the breadth of the decline. CoinGecko data paints a grim picture across meme coin categories.
Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens
AI Meme tokens have been hit hardest, falling 46% year to date. Dog-themed, 4chan-themed, and Elon Musk-inspired tokens all dropped roughly 28% to 30% in lockstep.
The Boy’s Club and Frog-themed categories held up relatively better, each declining around 19% to 20%. The sole outlier is the Four.meme Ecosystem on BNB Chain, which has more than tripled since January.
The second signal is fading dominance. CryptoQuant data shows meme coin dominance within the altcoin market fell from 0.042 in mid-February to 0.034 in March. This suggests that capital is rotating away from meme tokens.
The third signal is collapsing participation. Solana, which served as the primary hub for memecoin speculation, has seen on-chain engagement collapse. Analyst Shah noted that the number of daily decentralized exchange (DEX) traders on Solana has hit their lowest levels on record.
“Participation is at all time lows, just a few thousand people are still active, so good coins that once had 100M–1B potential are stuck trading between 500k- 20M,” he wrote.
Analyst Capexbt described the chain as a “ghost town.”
The fourth signal is the macro backdrop. Escalating geopolitical tensions, particularly the US-Iran conflict, have kept the Crypto Fear and Greed Index in extreme fear territory.
Without fresh liquidity and renewed risk appetite, conditions for a meme coin rally remain absent.
Subscribe to our YouTube channel to watch leaders and journalists provide expert insights
The post 4 Reasons Why Meme Coin Season Won’t Return Anytime Soon appeared first on BeInCrypto.
The GENIUS Act may have closed the door on interest-bearing payment stablecoins, but it has not ended the search for yield. It has simply pushed that search into new structures, where the return comes through DeFi design rather than through the stablecoin itself.
BeInCrypto asked two industry experts how the market is adapting.
Stefan Muehlbauer, Head of U.S. Government Affairs at CertiK, says the issue remains politically contested. He says”
“The question of yield is still facing strong opposition from banks, beyond the GENIUS Act, but also leading to discussions during the recent roadblock of the Senate’s version of the CLARITY Act market structure bill.”
In his view, the line now sits between products that resemble interest and products that present rewards differently.
“Banks are taking aim at yield that is earned as interest, while DeFi players are innovating around products that treat rewards more as a service fee through mechanisms such as staking,” Muehlbauer continues.
Anton Efimenko, co-founder at 8Blocks, sees the same divide. He notes:
“Under U.S. law, stablecoin issuers can’t issue stablecoins with passive yield accrual. Rebasing is basically banned. At the same time, “there’s nothing stopping those stablecoins from being used in DeFi products that generate yield through staking.”
He adds that the opportunity may extend even further. “If you think the structure through properly, a stablecoin issuer can also launch its own DeFi platform and distribute deposit yield through that layer.”
That leaves the U.S. stablecoin market in an unusual place. Yield remains one of the strongest product incentives in crypto, but in 2026, it has to be packaged with much more care.
Federal Charters Change the Balance of Power
Federal charters are where the balance of power changes most visibly. Crypto-native firms are already entering the U.S. financial system, and the focus now is how directly they can compete with the institutions that have controlled access to payments and settlement for decades.
Muehlbauer argues that this is where the biggest realignment is happening:
“The granting of national trust bank charters to crypto-native firms like Circle and Paxos has effectively dismantled the ‘walled garden’ that once protected legacy giants like JPMorgan Chase from outside tech competition.”
In his view, these licenses change who can operate with institutional standing inside the system. By securing federal charters, he says, digital asset issuers gain “the official federal imprimatur needed to compete directly for core payment and settlement services.” That gives them a path to “operational autonomy” rather than continued dependence on banking partners.
Fernando Lillo Aranda, Marketing Director at Zoomex, says the key change is that crypto-native firms no longer need to rely entirely on incumbent banks for legitimacy.
Aranda notes:
“Once a non-bank issuer can operate under a federal framework or an OCC-supervised charter, it is no longer just a technology company renting access to the banking system.”
In his view, that gives firms like Circle or Paxos clearer standing across payments, custody, and reserve management, turning them into directly regulated financial institutions rather than outside partners looking in.
At the same time, Lillo Aranda does not see this as a sudden reversal of bank dominance:
“That does not suddenly make JPMorgan weak – incumbents still dominate distribution, balance sheet depth, and client trust.”
But, he argues that the competitive gap has narrowed.
Where banks once held the regulatory advantage and crypto firms mainly moved faster on product design, some crypto-native issuers now have both. That shifts the contest away from basic market access and toward who can scale trust, distribution, and integration fastest.
Efimenko agrees that the market is opening up, but he does not think legacy finance has lost its edge.
“The U.S. stablecoin market is going to be highly competitive, but banks and asset managers will still hold the advantage,” he says. For him, the decisive factor is distribution.
“Crypto companies have to spend heavily on marketing to attract investors, while banks already have those investors on hand.”
Federal charters give crypto-native issuers more room to operate on their own terms, but banks still control the customer relationships that turn financial products into mass-market products.
Federal rules rise, but the states are still in the room
The GENIUS Act may have established a federal path for stablecoins, but it has not erased the state systems that helped define earlier phases of U.S. crypto regulation. What it has done is place them in a more constrained position.
Muehlbauer says the era of states acting as independent “laboratories of innovation” is largely over. In his view, the market is entering a period of “cooperative federalism” in which Washington sets the main rules for stablecoin oversight.
“Although the Wyoming Model and New York’s BitLicense endure, they are no longer autonomous,” Muehlbauer says. He argues that they now function within a federal framework that sets the minimum standards for capital and reserves.
He also points to a hard limit on how far a state-led route can go:
“Even successful state-chartered stablecoin issuers face a definitive ceiling. Once volume hits $10 billion, they must transition to primary federal oversight by the OCC.”
That leaves states with a role, but not the leading role they once claimed in crypto policy. They still influence licensing, supervision, and regional experimentation, though the center of gravity now sits in Washington.
CLARITY still has to solve the token question
Stablecoins may now have a federal framework, but the larger question of token classification remains unsettled. That is where the CLARITY Act comes into play.
Muehlbauer says the bill is designed to address what he calls the “security-forever” dilemma by updating how U.S. law treats tokens across their life cycle. He says:
“The Act isolates the ‘investment contract’ status by introducing ‘Ancillary Assets’, tokens whose value relies on the ‘entrepreneurial or managerial efforts’ of a central group, but only during their initial, centralized phase.”
In his telling, the bill creates a path for tokens to leave that category once a network develops beyond heavy reliance on a core team. Muehlbauer says:
“To provide a legal exit ramp, the Act establishes a ‘Maturity’ test, allowing tokens to graduate to Digital Commodities once the network becomes sufficiently decentralized.”
He says that originators would be able to certify that managerial efforts have become “nominal,” opening a 60-day window for the SEC to challenge that claim or allow the asset to proceed with a presumption of non-security status in secondary trading.
If that framework survives negotiations, it could bring the U.S. closer to a usable definition for utility tokens. Until then, stablecoins may have moved into a clearer legal era, while much of the rest of crypto still waits for its answer.
Final thoughts
The GENIUS Act has given the U.S. its clearest stablecoin framework yet, but it has also opened a new phase of competition. The debate now reaches beyond regulation itself and into who controls issuance, who captures the economics around digital dollars, and who gets direct access to the financial system.
Muehlbauer’s answers suggest that Washington has moved stablecoins into a more formal federal order, while leaving the next major fight unresolved around token classification and market structure.
Efimenko, meanwhile, points to the commercial reality behind that legal progress. Even with new charter opportunities and room for product innovation, crypto-native firms still have to compete with banks that already control distribution and client access.
Lillo Aranda sharpens that point: federal charters may have narrowed the old moat around legacy finance, but they have not erased the incumbents’ advantage in scale, trust, and customer ownership.
Stablecoins are entering a more defined legal era, but the balance of power between crypto firms, banks, regulators, and token issuers is still being contested in real time.
The post The American Pivot and Wall Street 2.0 appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Ethereum’s Ether (ETH) could slip toward the $1,200 region in the coming weeks, as a fractal-driven setup highlighted by trader Leshka.eth points to a potential deeper pullback if key support gives way. The analyst emphasizes a daily Supertrend pattern that has preceded outsized declines when bearish flips have failed to hold.
Historically, the pattern produced notable reversals: bullish flips that failed to sustain gains in October 2025 and January 2026 culminated in sharp drops of roughly 45% and 48%, respectively. The current formation forms near $1,990, and the trader warned that a break below that level could open the path toward the $1,200 zone. As Leshka.eth put it: “If that level breaks, the next target is the $1,200 zone.”
The narrative sits alongside a broader chart look that ties the bearish setup to a measured downside target from a bear-flag pattern on ETH’s daily chart, signaling a test of lower levels if momentum remains negative. The Ethereum price context has shifted as the market contends with a softer macro backdrop and a tug-of-war between risk appetite and liquidity considerations.
On the price action front, ETH has erased more than 17% from its monthly high in a little over two weeks. The pullback comes as Ether futures and spot sentiment loosen, with Ether ETFs reportedly registering net outflows of about $300 million in that span. Market observers describe the demand for Ethereum as having cooled to one of its weakest levels in 16 months, adding to the headwinds for a near-term recovery.
In the broader market backdrop, macro forces are not supportive of an immediate rebound. Risk appetite has waned amid geopolitical headwinds and recession concerns, while bond traders have pushed back expectations for Federal Reserve rate cuts beyond December 2027, according to probabilities tracked by CME’s FedWatch tool. The combination of softer macro signals and cleaner liquidity dynamics has kept ETH in a fragile zone even as short-term liquidity remains plentiful in some pockets of the market.
Key takeaways
- Bearish fractal setup on ETH’s daily chart points to a possible drop to $1,200 if the near-term level around $1,990 is breached, reaffirming a risk of deeper downside rather than a quick bounce.
- Historical occurrences where similar bullish flips failed have preceded sharp declines of roughly 45% to 50%, underscoring the difficulty of a sustained reversal in this pattern.
- On-chain demand signals show weak conviction among large and mid-size holders, with mega-whales (>10,000 ETH) flattening and mid-tier cohorts not reaccumulating decisively, suggesting limited downside protection from holders at present.
- The macro environment and ETF flows temper near-term momentum, with outflows and recession concerns weighing on Ethereum’s immediate prospects even as staking activity and exchange-supply dynamics offer a more complex longer-term picture.
Bearish fractal signals and price structure
The proposed bearish path hinges on a Supertrend-based pattern observed on ETH’s daily chart. The Supertrend, a trend-following indicator that changes color to mark direction, has previously produced brief bullish flips that did not stick. In the two notable prior instances—October 2025 and January 2026—the price rose briefly above the upper band only to fail and slide aggressively once the band’s support failed to hold. The current setup centers near $1,990, with the implication that a break below that crumb could activate the next leg lower toward the $1,200 zone. This aligns with a broader bear-flag interpretation that yields a measured downside target consistent with a sharper decline if support fails.
Trading-view charts referenced by the analyst illustrate a pattern where the price dropped decisively after the upper-band break and the subsequent loss of support, reinforcing the risk of a renewed downtrend if the current formation cannot sustain upward momentum. While such fractals do not guarantee outcomes, they provide a framework for assessing risk in a market dominated by macro uncertainty and shifting liquidity conditions.
On-chain behavior and holder conviction
Beyond price patterns, on-chain metrics paint a mixed picture of ETH demand. Glassnode data show that accumulation signals remain tepid across major wallet cohorts. For instance, mega-whale addresses holding more than 10,000 ETH have flattened after peaking in late 2025, and the 30-day change across this cohort has moved back toward neutral after extended declines. That pattern suggests that the biggest holders have not been stepping in with renewed aggression to back a sustained rally.
The story is similar for smaller but meaningful cohorts. Ethereum wallets holding between 1,000 and 10,000 ETH remain well below their late-2025 highs, with the 30-day change hovering around flat to marginally negative levels. Likewise, addresses in the 100–1,000 ETH bracket continue to trend below last year’s peaks, indicating a broad lack of renewed buying conviction among mid-sized to mid-tier holders. Taken together, the on-chain picture points to distribution pressures rather than broad-based accumulation, reinforcing the risk of a continued slide if the $1,990 zone gives way.
Despite the overall cautious stance from holders, there are some glimmers of potential longer-term support. Market observers note that on-chain activity around Ether staking has been rising, while the amount of Ethereum available on exchanges has fallen to ten-year lows. This combination signals that some holders are choosing to stake rather than liquidate, a dynamic that could eventually bolster Ethereum’s supply-side stability and reduce immediate selling pressure if demand improves. Still, these factors have not yet outweighed the current headwinds reflected in price action and investor sentiment.
For readers tracking the narrative, the balance of signals suggests that the immediate trajectory will hinge on whether ETH can defend the $1,990 threshold. A break lower would align with the fractal-driven downside scenario and the bear-flag target discussed by analysts, potentially amplifying the downside risks in the near term.
What to watch next
Investors should monitor a few key developments in the days ahead. First, whether ETH can sustain a move back above $1,990 or whether sellers regain control and push the price toward the $1,200 zone. Second, on-chain data—especially the behavior of mega-whales and the flow of Ether into staking pools—will be crucial for gauging whether demand may crystallize later in the year. Finally, macro momentum, including Fed expectations and risk appetite in relation to geopolitical developments, will continue to shape ETH’s risk premium and potential recovery path.
The market’s path remains uncertain, but the combination of a fragile macro backdrop, cooling on-chain demand, and fragile price patterns suggests a cautious stance for ETH in the near term as traders weigh the potential for further downside against the lure of long-term staking and shrinking exchange supply.
17 weird and wonderful Easter eggs to delight this year, from Lovehoney to Hotel Chocolat
Opinion: Museum idea no hospital pass
Goldman Sachs Flags 2 Crypto Stocks Worth Buying After 46% Sector Crash
-
NewsBeat5 days agoManchester United reach agreement with Casemiro over contract clause amid transfer speculation
-
News Videos4 days agoParliament publishes latest register of MPs’ financial interests
-
Sports7 days agoGary Kirsten Accuses Pakistan Cricket Board Of ‘Interference’, Mohsin Naqvi Responds
-
Sports7 days agoRemo Stars and Kano Pillars Strengthen Survival Hopes in NPFL
-
NewsBeat3 days agoThe Story hosts event on Durham’s historic registers
-
Business4 days agoInstagram, YouTube Found Responsible for Teen’s Mental Health Struggle in Historic Ruling
-
News Videos7 days agoCh 9 Financial Management Part 1 | Detailed One Shot | Class 12 Business Studies Boards 2026
-
NewsBeat5 days agoTesco is selling new Cadbury Dairy Milk bar and people can’t wait to try it
-
Entertainment7 days agoCynthia Bailey Dishes on ‘RHOA’ Season 17, Discusses Kandi
-
Tech7 days agoSamsung will soon let you control smart home devices from your car’s dashboard
-
Entertainment2 days agoLana Del Rey Celebrates Her Husband’s 51st Birthday In New Post
-
NewsBeat7 days agoColombian military plane with 110 soldiers onboard crashes following takeoff
-
Business6 days agoMore women enter wealth management, but few in advisory roles: study
-
Fashion6 days agoDoes It Matter What You Wear When You’re Laid Off and Looking?
-
Fashion7 days agoFringe Bags for the Season
-
NewsBeat6 days agoEntrepreneurs Forum survey reveals optimism in North East
-
NewsBeat6 days agoNASA Artemis II Astronauts enter 14-Day quarantine as moon rocket reaches launchpad
-
Business6 days agoLate-paying firms face multimillion-pound fines under new crackdown
-
Politics7 days agoHow Media Platforms Balance Performance and Accessibility in Image Delivery
-
Crypto World6 days agoBTC gives up $70,000 level as markets mull higher interest rates
You must be logged in to post a comment Login