The FIFA World Cup has always been more than football. For one month every four years, it becomes a celebration of national pride, cultural exchange and sporting excellence. It is one of the few events capable of bringing together people from almost every corner of the globe under a shared banner.

Yet, as the 2026 FIFA World Cup prepares to kick off across the United States, Canada and Mexico, the tournament finds itself engulfed in controversies that have little to do with football.

Referees have been deported. Players have been detained at airports. Fans have been denied entry despite securing tickets. Governments are trading accusations. Consumer groups are challenging FIFA’s ticketing policies. Environmental activists are warning about the event’s carbon footprint. And, on top of that, one of the three host nations is at war with one of the 48 participating countries.

Taken individually, none of these issues may be large enough to derail a tournament expected to attract billions of viewers worldwide. Together, however, they raise uncomfortable questions about whether football’s biggest spectacle can remain insulated from the political, economic and social tensions surrounding it.

This is not the first time a host nation has found itself at the centre of controversy. But unlike past World Cups, where criticism centred on a single issue — human rights in Qatar, corruption allegations in South Africa or Brazil, or labour concerns in Russia — the 2026 edition is facing multiple challenges simultaneously involving governments, FIFA, fans, players, referees and environmental groups.

The expanded 104-match World Cup begins on Thursday in Mexico and concludes on July 19 with the final in New Jersey. Of the total matches, 78 will be staged in the United States, including every fixture from the Round of 16 onwards.

And with the competition set to run for more than a month across three countries and 16 host cities, there is growing concern that many of these disputes could spill over into the tournament itself.

A World Cup host at war with a participant

For the first time in World Cup history, a host nation is involved in a military conflict with one of the participating countries. The United States’ confrontation with Iran has cast a long shadow over preparations.

Months before the tournament, US President Donald Trump publicly questioned whether Iran should even participate.

“The Iran National Soccer Team is welcome to The World Cup, but I don’t really believe it is appropriate that they be here, for their own life and safety. Thank you for your attention to this matter!”

Although Iran ultimately qualified and received assurances from FIFA, visa issues continued to plague the delegation. Iranian officials said visas were granted to players only days before their departure for the World Cup, while several administrative and managerial staff members were reportedly denied entry altogether.

The dispute has triggered accusations that the United States failed to fulfil the obligations expected of a World Cup host.

New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani criticised restrictions affecting World Cup participants and media personnel, arguing that such measures run counter to the spirit of the tournament.

“The denial of visas for journalists from certain countries, or the rejection of a visa for a coach of a team, as well as single-day visas for specific foreign national teams, this is anathema to what this tournament is supposed to be about,” Mamdani said on Monday.

Responding to concerns over visa-related issues, a US State Department spokesperson said Washington was coordinating with multiple agencies and FIFA to facilitate travel for participating teams.

“The Department of State is working closely with the White House, the Department of Homeland Security, and FIFA to support qualifying national teams’ travel to participate in World Cup events through our visa process,” the spokesperson said in a statement issued on Monday.

The spokesperson added that national security considerations would remain paramount during the visa review process.

“At the same time, the Administration will not waver in upholding US law and the highest standards of national security and public safety in the conduct of our visa process. We adjudicate each visa application on a case-by-case basis after rigorous review and thorough vetting to determine whether the individual is eligible under US law.”

When geopolitics enters the dressing room

The most alarming controversies have centred on immigration and border controls.

The latest flashpoint involved Somali referee Omar Abdulkadir Artan, regarded as one of Africa’s leading match officials. Artan was reportedly denied entry at Miami International Airport and placed on a return flight despite travelling with valid documentation and diplomatic credentials.

The episode sparked outrage across African football circles and prompted a public intervention from Somali Prime Minister Hassan Ali Khaire.

“I am deeply disappointed by the news that Omar Artan, Africa’s finest referee and one of the best in the world, may be unable to officiate at the FIFA World Cup due to visa-related circumstances,” said Hassan Ali Khaire.

“Omar has earned his place through talent, hard work, professionalism, and integrity. Having officiated at the highest levels of African and international football, his credentials speak for themselves. He represents not only Somalia, but also the aspirations of millions of young Africans who believe excellence should be recognised on the world stage,” he added.

Meanwhile, Somalia is not the only country affected by US policies.

Iraq vice-captain Aymen Hussein, whose goal secured his country’s place at the World Cup, was reportedly detained and questioned for seven hours upon arrival in the United States. Another player and a team photographer were also held for questioning, while the photographer was ultimately denied entry.

Such episodes have intensified scrutiny of US immigration procedures ahead of the tournament.

The beautiful game meets ugly economics

If politics has become one source of controversy, money has become another.

World Cup tickets have never been cheap, but many supporters argue that FIFA has pushed pricing into unprecedented territory.

Consumer groups in Europe filed formal complaints alleging that FIFA abused its dominant market position by imposing excessive prices and opaque sales practices.

The numbers explain the outrage.

The biggest source of anger has been FIFA’s use of dynamic pricing, a model more commonly associated with airlines and concert promoters.

Under the system, prices rise as demand increases, meaning supporters purchasing identical seats may pay vastly different amounts.

For many fans, that feels fundamentally at odds with football’s tradition of accessibility.

Fans paying more — and seeing less

Supporters have also complained about long online queues, technical glitches and unclear seat allocations.

Some fans who purchased premium viewing locations later alleged that temporary structures and additional seating arrangements would partially obstruct their view of the pitch.

Others accused FIFA of encouraging speculation through its official resale platform.

Critics note that the governing body takes a commission on resold tickets while imposing few restrictions on resale values, creating incentives for ticket flipping rather than discouraging it.

The result is a growing perception among supporters that football’s biggest event has become increasingly inaccessible to ordinary fans.

The supporters left behind

Ticket prices are only part of the problem.

Even fans willing to spend thousands of dollars face uncertainty over whether they can enter the country.

Supporters from several nations have encountered visa complications or travel restrictions. Reports suggest that fans from countries including Iran, Haiti, Senegal and Ivory Coast face significant barriers to attending matches.

Scottish supporters have also reported cases in which travel authorisations appeared to have been approved before later being rejected, leaving many facing substantial financial losses on flights and accommodation.

For an event that markets itself as the world’s most inclusive sporting festival, the image of ticket-holding supporters stranded outside host nations presents a serious reputational challenge.

The climate bill arrives

Then there is the environmental debate.

The 2026 edition is the largest World Cup in history.

The tournament has expanded from 32 teams to 48, increasing the number of matches from 64 to 104.

That expansion has come with significant environmental costs.

Researchers estimate that the competition could generate more than nine million tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions, largely due to extensive air travel between host cities spread across North America.

Environmental groups have described the event as potentially the most climate-damaging World Cup ever staged.

Even local transport plans have attracted criticism.

Fans have complained about expensive train fares, costly shuttle services and parking charges that, at some venues, run into hundreds of dollars per vehicle.

The contrast between FIFA’s sustainability messaging and the tournament’s projected environmental footprint has become another point of contention.

FIFA’s neutrality under scrutiny

The governing body has also faced criticism over its relationship with the Trump administration.

FIFA President Gianni Infantino’s increasingly close public association with Trump has prompted questions about whether the organisation is maintaining its traditional stance of political neutrality.

Critics point to appearances alongside the US president and symbolic gestures, including the presentation of a FIFA Peace Prize, as evidence that football’s governing body risks becoming entangled in geopolitical narratives.

The challenge for FIFA is obvious.

Every future visa dispute, airport detention or diplomatic disagreement involving participating nations now risks becoming a World Cup story.

And with teams, officials and supporters continuing to arrive throughout the tournament, further incidents cannot be ruled out.

Historically, World Cups have often managed to leave pre-tournament disputes behind once the football begins. The 2026 edition may not enjoy that luxury.

Many of the issues dominating headlines today are not one-off controversies tied to construction delays or organisational mistakes. They are ongoing disputes rooted in immigration policy, international politics, consumer rights and environmental concerns.

A visa denied during the group stage. A supporter detained near a stadium. A diplomatic dispute involving a participating nation. Another ticketing controversy. Any of these could quickly overshadow events on the pitch.

The football itself is likely to be spectacular. The expanded format promises more matches, more nations and more stories than ever before. Stadiums are expected to be full. Television audiences will reach into the billions.

But as the countdown to kick-off nears its end, the tournament arrives carrying more baggage than perhaps any World Cup in modern history.

The question now is whether the football can become the story again.

Or whether the controversies that have defined the road to the World Cup will continue to follow the tournament long after the opening whistle.

The Mountain West was reshaped by realignment, and the 2026 version of the league will have a very different look.

When talking about the football head coaches in the league, we see plenty of new faces but some familiar ones as well.

So how do all 10 of those head coaches stack up against one another?

Well, for that, we bring you our rankings of the 2026 MW Football Coaches.

---

1. Dan Mullen, UNLV

Mullen was hired with a proven track record and an SEC pedigree. He certainly delivered in season one with the Rebels.

Let us not forget that in his stints with Mississippi State and Florida, he compiled a 103-61 mark while leading the teams to 11 bowl games in 13 seasons.

His 10-win season in the debut campaign in Las Vegas led to a trip to the MW Title game and Frisco Bowl.

Mullen can recruit and has utilized the portal to load up the Rebels.

With the departure of some of the former conference heavies, the Rebels look to be the flag bearer for the conference—and they have the right man to carry that flag in Vegas.

Advertisement

---

2. Jason Eck, New Mexico

Eck followed up a highly successful stint at Idaho with a tremendous opening act in Albuquerque.

Year One saw the Lobos finish with nine wins and a 6-2 mark in league play, good enough for a four-way tie for the regular season crown. And UNM played a postseason game for the first time since the 2016 season.

While the OT loss to Minnesota had to sting, there is progress to build on.

Eck has not known losing in his time as a head coach, and it looks like that will continue at a school that has experienced nothing but losing in the decade before his arrival.

---

3. Timmy Chang, Hawaii

When Chang took over his alma mater, the Hawaii program was a mess.

Chang has turned things around in his four seasons, culminating with a nine-win season a year ago, capped off by a bowl win over California, the school’s first bowl game and bowl win since the 2025 season.

Chang has proven he can develop talent and has done wonders in cultivating the QB position.

Perhaps facing a win-or-else situation one year ago, Chang’s seat now looks comfortable, and success should continue on the Islands.

Advertisement

---

4. Troy Calhoun, Air Force

The dean of Mountain West head coaches is set to lead the Air Force Academy for the 20th season in 2026.

The last two seasons were a bit forgettable in Colorado Springs as the Falcons struggled in a pair of losing campaigns, something Calhoun has not experienced very often in his career.

Despite the 4-8 mark last year, the Falcons did finish strong, winning three of their final six.

There is no denying that Calhoun gets more out of the talent at his disposal than perhaps anyone else in the nation.

---

5. Tim Polasek, North Dakota State

In two seasons guiding the Bison, Polasek has led NDSU to a 26-3 mark, including the 2024 National Championship in his debut season as a head coach.

With an offensive background, it is no shock that NDSU has had a ton of success on that side of the ball during his tenure.

The Bison as they averaged 500+ yards per game last season and have run for 240+ per outing in each of their two seasons with Polasek at the helm.

NDSU was a powerhouse program at the FCS level. In Polasek, they seem to have a quality coach directing them as they make the jump to the FBS.

Advertisement

---

6. Ken Niumatalolo, San Jose State

After winning 109 games and nearly 54% of his games but wearing out his welcome at Navy, Niumatalolo is set to begin his third season with San Jose State.

Following a successful debut season, expectations were certainly not met in the second season with the Spartans. SJSU struggled in 2025 and ended up dropping six of its last seven.

It was a difficult stretch that Niumatalolo has not experienced many of during his 17 years as a head coach. His teams have played a postseason game in 12 of his 17 seasons.

The only other time a Niumatalolo-led team finished with a three-win season was 2018, when Navy went 3-10; the Mids followed that up with an 11-2 campaign in 2019.

The Spartans would certainly welcome that kind of turnaround in 2026.

---

7. Jeff Choate, Nevada

The Wolf Pack showed improvement between Year One and Two under Choate, improving from a winless conference mark in his first season to a 2–7-mark last season.

While modest, it was an improvement, and the Pack were much more competitive a season ago.

When making a list such as this, you can’t ignore the run of success he had leading Montana State to consecutive playoff appearances in 2018 and 19 before leaving to coach the defense at Texas.

Advertisement

As impressive as that background may be, results will need to be seen on the scoreboard this season if Choate is to remain in Reno long term.

---

8. Jay Sawvel, Wyoming

The first two seasons for Sawvel in Laramie have not gone well. The Cowboys have struggled to a combined 7-17 mark and mustered just a 4-11 mark in conference play.

Sawvel has a defensive background, and the Cowboys have been solid on that side of the ball, but the offense has not produced nearly enough for UW to find success.

He has proved his willingness to make the difficult decisions needed to right the ship as he completely overhauled his offensive staff ahead of this season.

Will it be enough to get positive results? If it is, then his leadership will prove valuable. If it is not, then the next change might need to be at the top.

---

9. Scotty Walden, UTEP

When Walden arrived in El Paso in 2024, he was coming off a successful four-year run with Austin Peay, where he led the Governors to a 26-14 mark and playoff appearance in 2023.

His time in West Texas has brought far less success. The Miners have limped to just five wins in the last two seasons and struggled to a 1-7 mark in Conference USA in 2025.

With the move to the MW, 2026 looks to be a pivotal season for the program and the head coach.

Advertisement

A successful transition to the new conference will go a long way in securing a long tenure for Walden, another struggle and it could mean the Miners are looking elsewhere in 2027.

---

10. Rob Harley, Northern Illinois

Rob Harley jumps into the top spot at Northern Illinois in 2026 with a bit of a tenuous situation.

Following the departure of Thomas Hammock to the Seahawks last February, Harley was named the interim head coach for the Huskies.

The interim tag remains as we inch closer to fall camp starting this summer. It will be trial by fire and a chance to earn the job this season for the first-time head coach.

He brings a defensive background with him as NIU makes the move from the MAC to the MW.

writes about various topics for SuperWest sports, including stats and records, college sports, and motorsports. He also founded and runs the Sports and Entertainment Research Center (SERC).

Latest posts by Stephen Vilardo (see all)

The All India Football Federation (AIFF) has agreed “in principle” to the club-led model of running the Indian Super League (ISL) for two years and has conveyed it to the sports minister, a top official said on Tuesday.

The development appeared to have cleared the decks for the start of the 2026-27 season of the ISL in September as scheduled.

AIFF Deputy Secretary General M Satyanarayan told PTI that a final agreement will be signed and formally announced on June 15 after “ironing out some details”. He also said that 2026-27 ISL will begin on September 4.

“We have agreed in principle to the proposal made by the ISL clubs and we have told this to the Sports Minister. The sports ministry also said it’s okay. So, we will make a formal announcement on June 15.

“We also have to see how it will work legally. So, there is no final agreement as of now. We have to work on some details and iron them out. That will happen in the next three-four days.

“The kick-off for ISL is finalised, it will begin on September 4. Durand Cup will be between June 25 and July 25.” 
The 2026-27 ISL is expected to be a full seven-month season, with home and away matches for the 14 participating teams.

On Monday, Sports Minister Mansukh Mandaviya had asked the AIFF and ISL clubs to create a task force that would thrash out a “structured plan” for at least the next two seasons of the crisis-ridden league, in a meeting here.

The clubs had proposed a two-year club-led pilot model for the 2026-27 and 2027-28 seasons as an interim solution before any long-term commercial arrangements. 

Another official, however, said that the AIFF will still own and operate the ISL.

“The clubs will be in charge of the commercial part, but that will be under AIFF’s supervision. The AIFF will still own and operate the league.

“We are doing this in the interest of the clubs, because they have also gone under losses. But we are still looking at a long-term model. At the end of two years, we are going to review the situation (club-led model).

“The clubs said at least for two years you (AIFF) allow us to do this model and then you can review it. They can later say, we’ll do it for five years or for 15 years. We will take a call at that point in time. As of now, we (AIFF) have agreed in principle the two-year model part.” 
He said the AIFF will also include Genius Sports in the discussions.

“We will also speak to Genius Sports. They (Genius Sport) will also be part of the whole thing. All three together will work on this.

“Moreover, the broadcast rights will have to be tendered.” 
What is club-led model of ISL? 
London-headquartered Genius Sports had emerged as the highest bidder for the commercial rights of the ISL after the AIFF floated the tender earlier this year. It had promised Rs 2,129 crore annually for ISL and a cup competition for the next 15+5 years, including 5% increase per year. That amounted to around Rs 64 crore per year.

Under the revenue sharing model as per the Genius Sports bid, the AIFF was to get Rs 12.4 crore in the first year. The AIFF also wanted to charge the clubs an entry fee, a proposal that has not found favour with the ISL clubs.

The clubs had opposed to Genius Sports becoming the commercial rights holders.

They instead proposed to acquire the commercial rights of the ISL for the two-year period and pay the AIFF Rs 15 crore per year to cover the costs associated with the regulatory functions that the national federation is required to discharge in its capacity as the governing body, including refereeing, legal, integrity and anti-doping support.

In their proposal, the ISL clubs had made “unequivocal” commitment that the AIFF’s role as the regulatory body of Indian football will be fully preserved and respected.

All core regulatory functions shall continue to remain exclusively with the AIFF, including referee appointment and management, legal and integrity oversight, anti-doping support and compliance, sporting regulations, player registration and transfer systems, compliance with FIFA and AFC regulations.

They said the proposed structure ensures a clean and appropriate separation between the commercial and regulatory functions of the league.

East Bengal FC were crowned the champions for the first time in the history of ISL ahead of arch-rivals Mohun Bagan Super Giant with the winners being decided on the concluding day of the league last month.

This season’s ISL was held in a single-leg round-robin format where all 14 participating teams competed against each other once. A total of 91 matches were played across the season, with each team playing 13 games.

A North Carolina judge dismissed a lawsuit filed by 31 ex-N.C. State male athletes who alleged sexual abuse by the athletic program’s former director of sports medicine.

The lawsuit was filed under the guise of treatment and harassment against Robert M. Murphy Jr., as well as N.C. State athletic officials who are tied to oversight rules.

However, Wake County Superior Court Judge Bryan Collins dismissed the claims, citing procedural reasons.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COM

North Carolina State Wolfpack club seats are prepared for fans during the college basketball game between North Carolina Tar Heels and North Carolina State at PNC Arena in Raleigh, N.C., on Jan. 8, 2019. (Michael Berg/Icon Sportswire)

This lawsuit, which was filed in February in state court, was a case that began in 2022 when a single athlete came forward with their own federal lawsuit. It was alleged that Murphy had years of misconduct, which included improperly touching genitals during massages and intrusive observation during urine sampling for drug tests.

In the end, Collins granted a motion from Murphy’s attorneys to seek dismissal of the case, ruling the statute of limitations had expired in claims that went as far back as 2013.

FORMER INDIANA BASKETBALL PLAYERS SAY TEAM DOCTOR SEXUALLY ABUSED THEM WITH UNNECESSARY PROSTATE EXAMS

Also, Collins dismissed claims against athletics officials, including ex-athletic director Debbie Yow and current athletic director Boo Corrigan, on jurisdictional grounds.

Kery Sutton, who represented the N.C. State former athletes dating back to the original case, said they plan to appeal the judge’s decision.

“This dismissal has nothing at all to do with Mr. Murphy’s sexual abuse of these 31 former student-athletes,” Sutton said in a statement. “It was decided based only on questions of legal procedure. We plan to appeal this outcome and in coming days will be adding new claims against NCSU for men who have recently come forward.”

The NC State Wolfpack logo appears on a pair of shorts during a second-round game in the Southwest Maui Invitational against the Boise State Broncos at the Lahaina Center in Lahaina, Hawaii, on Nov. 25, 2025. (Mitchell Layton/Getty Images)

“The truth is nothing happened but a man’s career being ruined for money,” Jared Hammett, Murphy’s attorney, said in a statement. “As a lawyer I am just glad that we have been able to help another person who needed support and found himself needing that defense.”

Hammett’s statement also described Murphy as “someone who dedicated his life to working with athletes.”

Only two of the athletes involved in the lawsuit filed without using “John Doe” as the plaintiff’s name to protect anonymity. One of them was Benjamin Locke, a men’s soccer player with the Wolfpack who filed the original lawsuit in August 2022.

The North Carolina State Wolfpack logo is displayed during the second half of the NC State game against the Miami Hurricanes at PNC Arena in Raleigh, N.C., on Jan. 15, 2020. (Jaylynn Nash/Icon Sportswire)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

“N.C. State does not condone sexual misconduct of any kind,” the school said in a statement. “The health and safety of our students and student-athletes is paramount to the university and our athletic programs.”

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

Irish Provinces 2026/27 Transfer Tracker: Leinster Clear-Out, Connacht Rebuild and Ulster Overhaul

The 2026/27 Irish provincial transfer picture is beginning to take shape, and it already looks like one of the most interesting summers in recent memory.

Leinster, Connacht, Munster and Ulster are all heading in different directions. Connacht have added serious quality, Leinster are facing a major squad reset, Munster have kept their business tight, while Ulster are once again dealing with a sizeable turnover of players.

Connacht: Strong Recruitment Window

Connacht have been busy, and their recruitment looks the most eye-catching of the four provinces so far.

The arrivals of Ciarán Frawley, Will Connors and Jerry Cahir from Leinster give Connacht proven Irish provincial quality, while François van Wyk arrives from Bath to add front-row depth.

There is also a clear academy pathway in play, with Fiachna Barrett, Seán Naughton, Matthew Victory and Billy Bohan all promoted.

Connacht Players In

• Ciarán Frawley from Leinster
• Will Connors from Leinster
• François van Wyk from Bath
• Jerry Cahir from Leinster
• Thomas Connolly from Old Belvedere
• Fiachna Barrett promoted from Academy
• Seán Naughton promoted from Academy
• Matthew Victory promoted from Academy
• Billy Bohan promoted from Academy

Connacht Players Out

• Joe Joyce to Gloucester
• Matthew Devine to Ulster
• Jack Carty retired
• Denis Buckley released
• Peter Dooley released
• Temi Lasisi released
• Oisín Dowling released
• Oisín McCormack released
• David Hawkshaw released
• Chay Mullins released
• Jack Aungier to Munster

Leinster: Major Experience Leaving

Leinster’s list is the most striking. Joey Carbery returns from Bordeaux, while Stephen Smyth, Conor O’Tighearnaigh and Josh Kenny step up from the academy.

However, the outgoing list is significant. Will Connors, Ciarán Frawley, Luke McGrath, John McKee, Rabah Slimani, Jerry Cahir and Rieko Ioane are all listed as leaving, while James Lowe is also departing.

The academy departures are also notable, with Billy Corrigan, Mahon Ronan, Liam Molony, Páidí Farrell and Henry McErlean all leaving.

Leinster Players In

• Joey Carbery from Bordeaux
• Stephen Smyth promoted from Academy
• Conor O’Tighearnaigh promoted from Academy
• Josh Kenny promoted from Academy

Leinster Players Out

• Rabah Slimani to Toulon
• Jerry Cahir to Connacht
• John McKee to Scarlets
• Will Connors to Connacht
• Luke McGrath to Perpignan
• Ciarán Frawley to Connacht
• Rieko Ioane to Blues
• James Lowe destination Japan
• Billy Corrigan destination unknown
• Mahon Ronan destination unknown
• Liam Molony destination unknown
• Páidí Farrell destination unknown
• Henry McErlean destination unknown

Munster: Smaller but Important Changes

Munster’s business has been more contained. The arrival of Marnus van der Merwe from Scarlets adds experience, while Jack Aungier arrives from Connacht.

Academy promotions are also a big part of Munster’s summer, with Sean Edogbo, Ben O’Connor, Ronan Foxe and Max Clein moving up.

Munster Players In

• Marnus van der Merwe from Scarlets
• Jack Aungier from Connacht
• Sean Edogbo promoted from Academy
• Ben O’Connor promoted from Academy
• Ronan Foxe promoted from Academy
• Max Clein promoted from Academy

Munster Players Out

• Jean Kleyn to Gloucester
• Niall Scannell retired
• John Ryan retired
• Thaakir Abrahams to Bulls

Ulster: Another Big Reset

Ulster have again made major changes. Eli Snyman, Matthew Devine, Ben Donnell, Jamie Benson, Eduardo Bello and Bryn Ward are all coming in.

However, the departures list is long, with twelve players leaving or released. That includes Angus Bell, Werner Kok, Marcus Rea, David Shanahan and Sean Reffell.

Ulster Players In

• Eli Snyman from Benetton
• Matthew Devine from Connacht
• Ben Donnell from Cardiff
• Jamie Benson from Harlequins
• Eduardo Bello from Newcastle Red Bulls
• Bryn Ward promoted from Academy

Ulster Players Out

• Angus Bell to NSW Waratahs
• John Andrew released
• Matthew Dalton released
• Wilhelm de Klerk released
• James Humphreys released
• Werner Kok released
• Ben Moxham released
• Rory McGuire released
• Bryan O’Connor released
• Marcus Rea released
• Sean Reffell released
• David Shanahan released

Net Transfer Movement

• Leinster: 4 in, 13 out — net -9
• Connacht: 9 in, 11 out — net -2
• Munster: 6 in, 4 out — net +2
• Ulster: 6 in, 12 out — net -6

The biggest talking point is Leinster’s squad turnover. For a province known for depth, losing that level of senior experience and academy talent in one summer is still significant.

Connacht, meanwhile, look to have made the most aggressive moves, adding proven Leinster players while also promoting from within. Munster appear relatively stable, while Ulster’s rebuild continues.

There is still time for more movement, but as things stand, Connacht may be the province who have done the sharpest business ahead of the 2026/27 season.

LiveScores Now Available at IrishScores.com

A World Cup referee from Somalia, who was denied entry into the United States, received a hero’s welcome in Mogadishu on Wednesday, where he vowed to officiate at the next tournament and urged Somali youths to embrace national pride.

Omar Artan was poised to become the first referee from Somalia to officiate at a World Cup, having been included on Fifa’s final list for the competition. Recognised as one of Africa’s top referees, he was named the continent’s best male referee in 2025.

However, his journey was cut short at Miami International Airport on Saturday due to “vetting concerns,” according to a statement from US Customs and Border Protection, which offered no further details. Fifa subsequently removed him from the referee list.

Despite being issued a visa last week by the Somalia Embassy in Kenya, Artan, who was due to join other World Cup referees at their training base in Miami, was forced to return home. Upon his arrival in Mogadishu, he expressed gratitude to the Somali government, its people, and Fifa for their unwavering support.

“I promise you, God willing, that I will attend the next one,” he declared, as hundreds of supporters waved the Somali flag. “I want the Somali public to take comfort in this and remain confident.”

The highly unusual decision by the US to bar a Fifa-appointed match official from entering a World Cup host nation sparked global outrage and prompted questions among some fans regarding America’s capacity to host the prestigious event. Somalia is among nearly 40 countries subject to travel restrictions implemented under the Trump administration’s immigration policies.

Hundreds of supporters, government officials, and members of Somalia’s football community gathered hours before Artan’s arrival at Aden Adde International Airport. As he disembarked, flag-waving supporters crowded around him, draping him in the national flag.

He was then escorted by police to the airport’s VIP terminal, where he was greeted by Somalia’s Minister of Youth and Sports, officials from the Somalia Football Federation, and other dignitaries, before addressing the press.

“It is up to all of us to defend the Somali name,” Artan stated. “Somalia belongs to us, whether it is in a bad state or a good state. That flag belongs to us, and that passport belongs to us.”

In a nation where decades of conflict and the rise of the al-Qaida-linked al-Shabab extremist group have often limited opportunities, Artan’s denial brought widespread disappointment.

Yet, for many, it also served as a powerful reminder of what is possible when dreams are pursued.

World Health Organization Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus echoed this sentiment on X, writing: “You reached the summit of your profession and inspired a generation back home just by getting there, and being kept off the pitch you earned doesn’t change that.”

The PGA Tour’s time in the motor city is coming to an end.

On Tuesday morning, the Rocket Classic announced that it would be ending its tenure as a PGA Tour stop, ending an eight-year run for the tournament in Detroit.

“After nearly 13 years as a PGA Tour title sponsor, including eight years in Detroit, 2026 will mark the final Rocket Classic,” tournament director Mark Hollis said in a statement reported by the Associated Press’ Doug Ferguson. “We are incredibly proud of what this tournament has meant to the city, from creating unforgettable moments for fans to raising more than $10 million for local organizations.”

The Rocket Classic — nee Rocket Mortgage Classic — will play one final time in late July before drifting off into a sponsor-less sunset, with tournament title sponsor Rocket Mortgage declining its option to host the event in 2027, per the Detroit News’ Tony Paul.

The decision follows years of weaker fields in the event, which had fallen out of favor with top stars returning from summer travels at the Open Championship and preparing for the final sprint of the PGA Tour season, the FedEx Cup Playoffs.

But perhaps more pressingly, the decision represents the first of what is expected to be a groundswell of changes for longtime PGA Tour events in 2027 and beyond. PGA Tour CEO Brian Rolapp is expected to speak publicly in the coming weeks about the status of the Tour’s new “two track” schedule — a plan to reorient the Tour around a more coherent, easy to follow season-long competition stratified into two distinct buckets, one with larger purses and elevated events for the better players. It is expected that Rolapp’s next update will provide more clarity around the shape of each of those tracks, which could produce even bigger windfalls for the Tour around its biggest events, but could leave some smaller events, like the Rocket Classic, in limbo.

The status of golf’s calendar represents Rolapp’s biggest swing since being announced as PGA Tour CEO a year ago. The PGA Tour schedule has existed under its current general shape and dimensions for the better part of three decades, and to no small degree of financial success. At one point in the early LIV days, its predictably and repeatability were mentioned as strengths by players for both tours.

But critics have suggested that the Tour’s model, while profitable, comes at the expense of a greater (and even more profitable) sense of coherence and drama. Tour events take place twelve months out of the year, and many of the biggest moments on the Tour schedule come in the earliest months of the season, costing the Tour the kind of season-long narrative arc with a dramatic conclusion that fills the calendars (and bank accounts) most other professional sports leagues.

Under the first track of Rolapp’s “two track” vision, the Tour would coalesce the lion’s share of financial support around a smaller, more prominent series of tournaments. Supporters of this vision suggest it amounts to a relatively small shift in the overall pro golf calendar — the underlining of an already existing, if unspoken stratification between certain “big” PGA Tour events and other “local” ones.

Still, there is fair reason to be skeptical: The FedEx Cup Playoffs were initially intended to serve as a bridge to the same outcome of a unified, season-long Tour; they proved to be a ramp to tens of millions in sponsor-dollars and not much more. Rolapp’s vision not only aims to pursue these same ends — it also threatens to undercut the “local” events that have served as the bedrock of the tour for decades.

The Rocket Classic is the first of those events to be shown the door. But with change still lingering in the air at PGA Tour HQ as the heart of the golf season comes into focus, it may very well not be the last.

Cricketer-turned-commentator Aakash Chopra has opined that India’s chances of winning the Women’s T20 World Cup 2026 could depend on how they fare in the Powerplay overs. He highlighted that Smriti Mandhana and Shafali Verma could control the game with the bat, pointing out that the Indian vice-captain has an excellent record in England.

The Women’s T20 World Cup 2026 will be played in England from Friday, June 12, onwards. India will begin their campaign with a clash against Pakistan on Sunday, June 14.

In a video shared on his YouTube channel, ‘Aakash Chopra,’ the former India batter reckoned that the opening combination of Mandhana, especially considering she likes batting in English conditions, and Shafali could be among the keys to India’s prospects in the global T20 event.

“The Indian girls have won the 50-over World Cup. Can they win the 20-over World Cup? That’s the big question. It’s a good team. Where do you win T20 games? One is if you control the Powerplay with the bat and with the ball. With the bat, Shafali Varma’s consistent avatar is very, very good,” Chopra said.

“Smriti Mandhana will be there with her. Smriti Mandhana in England is another beast altogether. She has scored a lot of runs there. So, Smriti Mandhana and Shafali Verma, as your Powerplay players, can actually control the game. One of them should bat deep into the innings, which they can,” he added.

Chopra noted that the onus will be on Richa Ghosh and Harmanpreet Kaur to make the most of the death overs with the bat.

“Then followed by Yastika Bhatia, Jemimah Rodrigues, Harmanpreet Kaur, and Richa Ghosh. The last five overs’ responsibility will be on Richa Ghosh and Harmanpreet Kaur. You will expect Deepti Sharma to continue playing as attackingly as she has started doing in the WPL. It seems like we are actually quite set in batting. We are as good as any other World Cup team in batting,” he observed.

Smriti Mandhana has amassed 4,333 runs at an average of 29.88 in 160 T20I innings. She has a much better record in England, having scored 650 runs at an average of 38.23 in 19 innings.

“Since it’s England and it would swing, Renuka Singh Thakur’s value increases” – Aakash Chopra on India’s bowling heading into Women’s T20 World Cup 2026

In the same video, Aakash Chopra noted that the focus will be on Renuka Singh Thakur, especially considering the seamer-friendly English conditions, Arundhati Reddy, and Kranti Gaud with the ball in the Powerplay overs.

“In bowling, again, the Powerplay overs, whether it’s Renuka Singh Thakur, Arundhati Reddy, or Kranti Gaud, the focus will be on them. Even if Nandani Sharma plays, she will have a bigger role in the death overs. Since it’s England and it would swing, Renuka Singh Thakur’s value increases,” he said.

The analyst added that India’s middle-over and death-over performances with the ball could define how far they reach in the Women’s T20 World Cup 2026.

“Death overs, that will be the big challenge, because we get our spinners to bowl the death overs many times. How we bowl in the death overs might actually define. We might end the Powerplay on equal terms, but can we grab them with spin in the middle overs, and whether we can bowl well in the death overs, I think that will be the defining part,” Chopra observed.

Aakash Chopra opined that India have the team to beat South Africa and Australia in the Women’s T20 World Cup 2026 group phase, and then go on to win the tournament. He added that winning the 50-over and 20-over World Cups together will be a different kind of domination.