Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Crypto World

Crypto PACs Push Md. Ads, Testing Disclosure as Cal. Primaries Open

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

Crypto political action committees backed by the Fairshake network and its Protect Progress affiliates are continuing to deploy significant resources into U.S. political races, with new Federal Election Commission disclosures detailing substantial media spending and candidate support in California, New Jersey, and South Dakota. The activity coincides with heightened attention to Maryland’s forthcoming primary and a broader regulatory discourse around how crypto firms participate in the political process.

According to filings with the U.S. Federal Election Commission (FEC), the Protect Progress affiliates—working through the Fairshake apparatus—spent more than $3 million to back Democratic House candidates in California and New Jersey. A separate affiliate, Defend American Jobs, allocated more than $411,000 to support Republican Senator Mike Rounds’ reelection bid in South Dakota. In addition to its activity in California, Protect Progress signals readiness for a sizable Maryland push ahead of the June 23 primary. FEC records show the crypto-backed PAC spending more than $3.1 million on media to support Adrian Boafo in Maryland’s 5th district, and roughly $320,000 backing Ritchie Torres’ reelection in New York’s 15th district, which also holds a primary on June 23.

Source data corroborates the broader footprint of crypto-linked political giving. As of January, Fairshake reported a war chest exceeding $193 million. In parallel, other crypto-aligned committees—such as Fellowship, funded by Cantor Fitzgerald and Anchorage Digital, and the Blockchain Leadership Fund, supported by Chainlink and Anchorage—have contributed to a diversified slate of candidates and districts. The Texas primary results from the prior week highlighted a sweep of crypto-backed candidates in that state’s races, illustrating a nationwide pattern of industry-backed influence in primary contests.

Overall, the disclosures reflect a deliberate strategy to influence policy perspectives on digital assets, with Protect Progress explicitly signaling its aim to contest lawmakers it deems “anti-crypto.” In particular, the group supported a candidate in Texas who subsequently faced a Democratic opponent in a high-profile primary, underscoring the potential for crypto-aligned committees to shape political risk and regulatory narratives across multiple states.

Advertisement

Key takeaways

  • FEC filings show Protect Progress affiliates spent over $3 million to back Democratic House candidates in California and New Jersey, while Defend American Jobs deployed more than $411,000 to back Senator Mike Rounds in South Dakota.
  • In Maryland, Protect Progress earmarked more than $3.1 million in media expenditure for Adrian Boafo in MD-5 and roughly $320,000 for Ritchie Torres in NY-15, both of which held or will hold primaries on June 23.
  • Crypto-aligned PACs have built a broad fundraising and media apparatus, with Fairshake maintaining a reported war chest of over $193 million as of January.
  • Recent Texas primary outcomes indicated crypto-backed candidates won, reinforcing the perception of crypto-centric influence in U.S. electoral contests.
  • The CLARITY Act (Digital Asset Market Clarity) has moved onto the Senate calendar for consideration, with amendments from the Agriculture and Banking Committees likely requiring consolidation before a vote, signaling intensified regulatory scrutiny of digital assets.

Crypto political activity and the Maryland primary landscape

The Maryland primary cycle, culminating on June 23, is a focal point for crypto-linked fundraising because of the state’s evolving regulatory stance on digital assets and the potential impact on financial services in the region. FEC filings reveal a sizeable media spend dedicated to Adrian Boafo in the 5th district, underscoring the commitment of crypto-aligned committees to influence down-ballot outcomes that could affect future policy and oversight in the nation’s capital region.

Beyond Maryland, the filings highlight continued activity in California and New Jersey, where Protect Progress affiliates supported Democratic candidates in House races. The pattern suggests a broader objective: shaping the legislative environment around crypto, stablecoins, and digital asset market structure at a time when U.S. policy is under intense scrutiny from regulators and lawmakers alike.

Regulatory context: the CLARITY Act advances in the Senate

Legislative momentum around clear rules for digital assets remains a central thread in U.S. policy. The Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act has advanced within the Senate, with initial movement through the Agriculture Committee in January and a Banking Committee review in May. Senate leadership has now placed the bill on the chamber’s calendar for consideration and potential floor action. The two versions of CLARITY that moved through the committees with amendments are expected to be consolidated before any vote, underscoring the complexity of aligning regulatory objectives across multiple jurisdictions and policy areas.

From a compliance and enforcement perspective, CLARITY’s progression intersects with ongoing discussions around MiCA-style regulation, U.S. agency authority (SEC, CFTC, DOJ), and the interplay with AML/KYC frameworks, licensing standards, and banking integration. The broader regulatory environment remains unsettled in terms of how crypto firms will secure licenses, meet cross-border disclosure requirements, and engage with banks on digital-asset custody and settlement services. In this context, lawmakers and industry participants are tracking how the Senate’s handling of CLARITY will shape enforcement priorities, cross-border operations, and capital-raising activities for crypto enterprises.

Cointelegraph notes that the push for regulatory clarity has attracted attention from lawmakers who fear strategic gaps in the U.S. framework could be exploited by less transparent markets. In particular, broader industry commentary highlights the risk that delays in clarity may cede regulatory leadership to other jurisdictions, a concern echoed by policymakers seeking to align U.S. laws with global standards while preserving innovation.

Advertisement

Closing perspective

As crypto-affiliated political action and regulatory initiatives unfold, institutions, exchanges, and financial partners will monitor disclosures for risk, compliance implications, and licensing trajectories. The coming weeks will reveal how the Maryland primary results, the wider Fundraising activity, and the Senate’s CLARITY calendar will shape the balance between political influence, investor protection, and robust regulatory oversight.

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Robinhood Officially Enters Canada After Closing WonderFi Acquisition

Published

on

Robinhood Markets has completed its $180 million acquisition of WonderFi, a Toronto-based provider of digital asset products and services. With the deal, Robinhood is entering the Canadian market by acquiring an established operator of regulated crypto exchanges.

As part of the acquisition, WonderFi’s two regulated crypto trading platforms, Bitbuy and Coinsquare, will become part of the Robinhood brand. Canadian customers will be invited to use the Robinhood app, which offers a flat 0.5% fee per CAD trade, along with the company’s user interface, user experience, and global infrastructure.

Major Canadian Crypto Push

In its official press release, Robinhood said it will continue supporting WonderFi’s existing institutional relationships in Canada while building on the institutional business it has developed through Bitstamp. The expansion is part of Robinhood’s broader strategy to build an integrated global financial ecosystem.

Following the acquisition, Robinhood now has more than 1 million international funded customers, including approximately 300,000 funded customers that came through WonderFi. WonderFi employees will join Robinhood’s existing Canadian workforce of more than 240 employees. Robinhood established its Canadian headquarters in Toronto in 2024 as an engineering hub, citing Canada’s strong technology talent pool.

Advertisement

In a statement, Johann Kerbrat, SVP and General Manager of Robinhood Crypto & International, said

“WonderFi has extensive experience operating regulated crypto platforms that serve beginner and advanced crypto users alike, making it an ideal partner to accelerate Robinhood’s mission in Canada. We’re pleased to have closed our acquisition and look forward to delivering innovative, user-centric investing products to Canadian customers.”

The deal comes months after Robinhood reported a sharp decline in crypto trading activity during the first quarter. Crypto transaction revenue fell 47% year-over-year to $134 million, while crypto trading volume dropped 48% to $24 billion. The company also missed analyst expectations for earnings and revenue, even though net income increased 3% to $346 million.

Layer 2 Plans

In February, Robinhood launched the public testnet for Robinhood Chain, an Ethereum Layer 2 network built using Arbitrum technology. The testnet gives developers early access to the network ahead of a planned mainnet launch later this year and allows them to build and test applications using standard Ethereum tools.

According to the company, several infrastructure providers, including Alchemy, Chainlink, LayerZero, and TRM, had already begun integrating with the network.

Advertisement

The post Robinhood Officially Enters Canada After Closing WonderFi Acquisition appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

CFTC Approves First Perpetual Futures Contract on a US Regulated Venue

Published

on

Brian Armstrong's Bold Prediction: AI Agents Will Soon Dominate Global Financial

TLDR:

  • The CFTC approved the first perpetual futures contract on a US regulated venue on May 29, 2025.
  • Perpetual futures use a funding rate mechanism to keep contract prices aligned with the spot market.
  • Regulated platforms Kalshi and Polymarket stand to benefit from the CFTC’s new regulatory framework.
  • The approval marks a step toward DeFi platforms like Hyperliquid gaining access to US-based users.

The CFTC perpetual futures approval on May 29 marks a turning point for US derivatives markets. For the first time, a perpetual futures contract has received regulatory clearance on a domestic venue.

The move follows crypto’s growing influence on traditional finance, after stablecoins and tokenized assets led the way. It also opens a path for decentralized platforms like Hyperliquid to eventually reach American users.

Crypto Exports Another Innovation to Traditional Finance

The digital assets industry has steadily introduced new financial instruments to mainstream markets. Stablecoins were the first major export, offering dollar-pegged utility across global payment rails.

Tokenized assets followed, bringing real-world value onto blockchain infrastructure. Now, perpetual futures complete a third wave of crypto-native innovation entering regulated finance.

Grayscale noted the progression in a post on X, pointing to the CFTC approval as a continuation of that trend. The firm described it as another step in DeFi platforms reaching US users over time.

Advertisement

This framing places the CFTC decision within a broader structural shift, not just a regulatory footnote. Traditional finance is increasingly drawing from a crypto playbook built over the last decade.

Advertisement

The approval also benefits regulated US platforms operating in prediction and derivatives markets. Kalshi and Polymarket stand to gain from clearer regulatory footing under this framework.

Additionally, the CFTC provided guidance allowing Coinbase Financial Markets to offer access through a Foreign Futures framework. That guidance further broadens the scope of who can participate under US oversight.

The timing of this approval aligns with a more open regulatory environment in Washington. Regulators have shifted toward engagement rather than enforcement in recent months.

As a result, market participants are now better positioned to structure compliant perpetual futures products. That shift creates room for more instruments to move from crypto-native venues into mainstream trading infrastructure.

Advertisement

How Perpetual Futures Work and Why They Matter

Unlike traditional futures, perpetual futures carry no expiration date and require no physical delivery. That structure makes them more flexible for traders seeking continuous exposure to an asset or price index.

They function similarly to total return swaps in traditional finance. The key difference is the funding rate mechanism that keeps contract prices anchored to the spot market.

The funding rate involves periodic payments exchanged between long and short position holders. When the futures price rises above spot, longs pay shorts to discourage further premium.

When it falls below, shorts pay longs to close the discount gap. The larger the price divergence, the bigger the payment in either direction.

Advertisement

This mechanism creates a built-in correction system without requiring contract settlement. It keeps market prices honest while allowing open-ended exposure for participants.

Traders can hold positions indefinitely, adjusting based on funding costs rather than expiry calendars. That flexibility has made perp futures the dominant derivative product across crypto markets globally.

The CFTC’s move now brings that structure into a compliant US framework for the first time. It sets a precedent for how crypto-native instruments can be adapted for regulated domestic venues.

Over time, it may also ease the path for DeFi-native platforms to extend services to US-based users. The approval is a structural development with long-term reach across both crypto and traditional finance markets.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

U.S. sanctions Nobitex, other Iranian crypto exchanges amid ongoing war

Published

on

U.S. sanctions Nobitex, other Iranian crypto exchanges amid ongoing war

The U.S. Treasury Department blacklisted several Iranian crypto exchanges, including its largest platform Nobitex, on Tuesday as part of its ongoing campaign against the Iranian government.

The Treasury’s Office of Foreign Asset Control announced that Nobitex, Wallex, Bitpin and Ramzinex, as well as some of these exchanges’ executives, were being added to its global Specially Designated Nationals list, barring any U.S. entities or businesses and people who use the U.S. dollar financial system from providing any financial services with the platforms.

The announcement came just days after Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced that his department had seized around $1 billion in crypto from Iranian exchanges and wallets since the beginning of the war against Iran.

“While Iran’s economy is in free fall, the regime has chosen to co-opt digital asset technologies for its own corrupt agenda, including evading sanctions and transferring wealth out of the country. Iran’s current economic chaos is proof that President Trump’s maximum pressure campaign has been a success,” Bessent said in a statement on Tuesday.

Advertisement

The announcement linked Tuesday’s action to Nobitex’s alleged association with “Iran’s terrorist activities, sanctions evasion efforts and Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC)-linked transactions,” which included ransomware payments.

Nobitex also helped move assets out of Iran after the U.S. began bombing it earlier this year, the press release said.

The Treasury Department said the sanctions actions were part of its broader campaign against Iran.

“Additionally, Treasury recently warned of the sanctions risk associated with complying with Iranian demands for passage through the Strait of Hormuz, such as “toll” payments, including payments made via fiat currency, digital assets, offsets, informal swaps, or other in-kind payments such as nominally charitable donations, and providing sensitive vessel information,” the press release said.

Advertisement

Read more: U.S. says it seized about $1 billion in Iranian crypto as pressure campaign expands

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Was MicroStrategy and Saylor Right to Sell Some Bitcoin? The Maximalism Debate

Published

on

Was MicroStrategy and Saylor Right to Sell Some Bitcoin? The Maximalism Debate

Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy), the largest corporate Bitcoin holder, sold 32 BTC for roughly $2,5 million between May 26 and 31, marking its first crypto sale since 2022. Although the BTC sold represents only 0.004% of the company’s entire treasury, the move is symbolic for Bitcoin maximalists and detractors alike.

We break down what happened, the voices defending the move, and the analysts who see a real warning sign.

What the MicroStrategy Bitcoin Sale Actually Means

Strategy disclosed its transaction in a Form 8-K filing, noting that the proceeds were used to fund preferred stock distributions. The numbers put the move in perspective.

Advertisement

Despite the sale, Strategy still holds 843,706 BTC valued at more than 60 billion dollars, with an average acquisition cost of 75,699 dollars per coin.

The 32 BTC sale represents less than 0.004% of the entire treasury. Yet the symbolic weight runs heavy, since Michael Saylor built the company’s brand on aggressive, relentless Bitcoin accumulation and a public never-sell stance.

Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens

The transaction introduces nuance to that narrative for the first time in years. It tests whether the market views Strategy as a pure Bitcoin proxy or as a publicly traded company balancing many real financial obligations.

That question sharply divides the crypto community. The same small sale appears to some analysts as strategic mastery and to others as the first visible crack in an ironclad corporate maximalist position.

Why Some Experts See the Sale as Bullish

Several prominent analysts dismissed the move as either irrelevant or quietly positive for both Bitcoin and Strategy stock heading into the next phase of the cycle.

Advertisement

Zynx downplayed the newspushing back against early FUD and saying he remains bullish on MSTR despite the wave of misinformation that followed the disclosure.

“I can already see the misinformation and FUD about how Saylor was ‘forced to sell’. Bullish on $MSTR,” Zynx noted.

Michaël van de Poppe framed the sale as the resolution of an uncertainty hanging over the market. He argued the FUD surrounding any Saylor Bitcoin sale is now over, which he considers structurally bullish.

At the same time, Against Wall Street offered the deepest strategic read. Citing Saylor’s earlier comments, the analyst called the 32 BTC sale symbolic, designed to satisfy credit rating agencies and ultimately unlock far larger Bitcoin repurchases later.

Advertisement

“If this was about booking profits, they could’ve dumped way more, they’re already deep in the green This wasn’t profit-taking. It was symbolic. A calculated move to keep the rating agencies happy while staying all-in on Bitcoin. Chess, not checkers,” Against Wall Street said.

His phrasing summed up the bullish camp: “Chess, not checkers.” For this group, Strategy is playing a long game where small tactical sales actually protect the broader accumulation engine.

Telcier asked the market to keep perspective, calling 0.0037% of the position effectively nothing. Meanwhile, ImCryptOpus framed any resulting dip as a smart accumulation opportunity for retail and institutional buyers alike.

Jack echoed the long-term bullish view. He noted that selective selling to fund dividends could strengthen confidence in Strategy’s related financial instruments and ultimately support greater net Bitcoin accumulation across cycles.

Together, these voices argue the sale aligns with previously communicated treasury strategies. In their view, it shows financial sophistication rather than any loss of conviction in Bitcoin as a long-term store of value.

Why Other Analysts See a Warning Signal

The bearish camp focused less on the size of the sale and more on what it signals about Strategy’s evolving discipline. For these analysts, like anti-Bitcoin and “Gold Bug” Peter Schiff, the precedent matters far more than the dollar amount.

“Last week $MSTR sold 32 Bitcoin for about $2.5 million at an average price of $77,135. Since Bitcoin’s biggest buyer has now become a seller, where will the new demand come from to sustain the pyramid? Bitcoin is already below $72K, which is about 7% below where @Saylor sold”, Schiff said.

0xNobler reacted bluntly, warning that the company has started liquidating Bitcoin and that the move “is not looking good for crypto.” His framing reflected the raw concern many maximalists felt during the announcement.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, DeFiTracer struck a similar tone, calling Strategy’s first historical sale extremely bad for markets. The argument centers on sentiment risk rather than on the actual selling pressure produced by the transaction itself.

Crypto McKenna had flagged the risk earlier. He noted that Strategy has shifted from never selling Bitcoin to selling some BTC to ensure dividend obligations are always met going forward across capital cycles.

“MSTR moved away from never selling Bitcoin to selling some Bitcoin to ensure dividend obligations are always met for STRC. Saylor basically has on a low leverage perp position on BTC and is paying funding to keep it open. STRC only becomes a ponzi if capital raised for STRC issuance is directed back to covering it’s obligations so MSTR may end up selling >1Bn of BTC to ensure they have an adequate cash balance to cover dividends”, Crypto McKenna exposed.

His key concern is perception. Market interpretation of this evolution could become much worse than the literal impact, especially if preferred stock obligations require additional sales over the coming quarters.

Advertisement

Tradinglord also voiced bearish concerns about the precedent. Once a public company introduces sales to meet financial commitments, the door opens to potentially larger disposals if conditions ever deteriorate.

Critics argue that even a negligible sale chips away at the diamond hands ethos that fueled Strategy’s brand and inspired thousands of retail investors throughout previous cycles. That cultural shift carries real weight.

The contrast reflects a deeper tension. Bullish analysts treat Bitcoin as an actively managed treasury asset. Bearish voices see it as an absolute store of value that must never be touched, regardless of dividend obligations.

Advertisement

With 843,706 BTC still on the balance sheet, Strategy’s Bitcoin position remains overwhelmingly intact. Yet how the company manages future obligations will likely shape how the market perceives every corporate Bitcoin strategy from here.

The post Was MicroStrategy and Saylor Right to Sell Some Bitcoin? The Maximalism Debate appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

U.S. Treasury Sanctions Iran’s Nobitex Over Alleged Crypto Finance Links

Published

on

Brian Armstrong's Bold Prediction: AI Agents Will Soon Dominate Global Financial

TLDR

  • The U.S. Treasury sanctioned Nobitex, which it described as Iran’s largest digital asset exchange.
  • According to the Treasury, Nobitex handled more than half of Iranian digital asset inflows in 2025.
  • OFAC alleged that Nobitex supported sanctions evasion, stablecoin transfers, and IRGC-linked crypto transactions.
  • Treasury also designated Amir Hossein Rad and other Nobitex leaders in the sanctions action.
  • The action forms part of the Economic Fury campaign targeting Iran-linked financial and digital asset networks.

The U.S. Treasury moved against Iran’s largest digital asset exchange, Nobitex, in a new sanctions action on Tuesday. The action targets alleged terror finance, sanctions evasion, and regime-linked crypto flows.

Treasury Targets Nobitex and Iranian Crypto Exchanges

According to the Department of the Treasury, OFAC designated Nobitex under counterterrorism and Iran financial-sector authorities. The release also named three other Iranian digital asset exchanges in the action. Treasury described Nobitex as Iran’s largest digital asset exchange. It also alleged that the platform handled more than half of Iranian digital asset inflows in 2025.

According to the release, Nobitex supported payments tied to Iran’s sanctioned activities and IRGC-linked transactions. Treasury also linked some activity to wallets associated with IRGC-affiliated ransomware actors.

The department also designated Amir Hossein Rad, Nobitex’s chairman, co-founder, and former chief executive. Treasury stated that other Nobitex leaders and officials also faced sanctions. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent connected the action to the Trump administration’s Iran policy. “Treasury will continue to follow the money,” Bessent stated in the release.

OFAC Alleges Stablecoin Use and Sanctions Evasion

According to the Treasury, Nobitex helped the Central Bank of Iran access hundreds of millions of dollars in stablecoins. The department alleged those funds supported efforts tied to the falling value of the Iranian rial. The release also claimed that Nobitex helped regime insiders reach international digital asset exchanges. Treasury framed that activity as part of sanctions evasion across several jurisdictions.

Advertisement

According to OFAC, Nobitex acted as a vehicle for sanctions evasion through its earlier Central Bank links. The department also alleged that the platform contributed to repression inside Iran. Treasury claimed the exchange enabled the Iranian government to conduct warrantless surveillance of civilians.

Additionally, the release stated that two Nobitex co-founders had close links to Khamenei’s family. The department cited Executive Order 13224, as amended, in its Nobitex designation. It also cited Executive Order 13902, which covers Iran’s financial sector.

Economic Fury Expands Pressure on Iran

The sanctions form part of the Economic Fury and maximum pressure policy. The department stated that the campaign targets Iran’s ability to generate, move, and repatriate funds. Treasury reported that its actions have blocked access to tens of billions of dollars for Iran-linked networks. It also referenced actions that froze nearly half a billion dollars in regime-linked cryptocurrency.

The release stated that Treasury has targeted shadow banking networks, oil channels, military supply networks, and proxy groups. It also warned foreign companies against supporting illicit Iranian commerce. The administration now targets both traditional sanctions evasion and digital asset exploitation. The department also raised the possibility of secondary sanctions on foreign financial institutions.

Advertisement

Treasury also warned about payments tied to passage through the Strait of Hormuz. It listed fiat currency, digital assets, offsets, swaps, and in-kind payments among possible sanctions risks. On May 27, the Treasury designated Iran’s so-called Persian Gulf Strait Authority. The department described it as an IRGC-linked scheme tied to shipping through the Strait of Hormuz.

The release also stated that Nobitex played a role after U.S. combat operations in Iran began. Treasury alleged that the platform helped protect and move assets despite internet blackouts. According to OFAC, the action targets persons who materially assisted or supported the IRGC. The department also stated that Nobitex operated in Iran’s financial sector.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bitcoin Slumps Toward $69K as Mt. Gox Moves 10,422 BTC to Unmarked Wallets

Published

on

🩸

Glee is written all over the faces of bears, as Bitcoin (BTC USD) slipped toward $69,950 on June 2 after on-chain monitoring tools confirmed the Mt. Gox estate moved 10,422 BTC, worth approximately $739 million, from cold storage to multiple unmarked, newly created wallet addresses.

The transfer marks the first major on-chain activity from the defunct exchange’s rehabilitation estate since late 2024, snapping months of relative quiet from one of crypto’s most closely watched wallet clusters.

BTC fell from $71,000 to a low of $69,950 within an hour of the news breaking, triggering cascading crypto liquidations across leveraged long positions.

The immediate market fear is an overhang of supply. With tens of thousands of BTC still under trustee control and creditor repayments continuing through 2026, every large wallet movement from the estate functions as a psychological pressure point, regardless of whether coins reach an exchange order book the same day.

Discover: The Best Crypto to Diversify Your Portfolio

Bitcoin News: Mt. Gox BTC Movement, What the On-Chain Data Actually Shows

The destination of the coins is what makes this transfer analytically significant. Unmarked wallets, addresses with no prior transaction history and no publicly verified affiliation with exchanges or known custodians sit in an interpretive grey zone.

Advertisement

They could represent internal estate reorganization, OTC block-sale preparation, or staging addresses ahead of exchange deposits. That distinction matters: a direct transfer to a Kraken or Bitstamp deposit address signals imminent creditor distribution; movement to fresh cold-storage addresses does not.

Mt. Gox Transaction / Source: Arkham

On-chain data from CryptoQuant shows that exchange inflow metrics for Bitcoin remained relatively stable in the immediate hours following the transfer, suggesting the 10,422 BTC had not yet reached exchange order books as of publication.

The transmission mechanism was clear nonetheless: algorithmic monitors flagged the Mt. Gox wallet cluster, headlines hit, and leveraged long positions were unwound before any actual selling occurred. The ghost of Mt. Gox does not need to sell to move markets, it only needs to move.

This pattern has repeated across every major estate transfer since 2024. In July of that year, the trustee moved 44,527 BTC in a single transaction, Arkham Intelligence and on-chain analysts flagged it as repayment preparation, and Kraken later confirmed it had received funds for staged creditor distribution.

A subsequent tranche of nearly 47,229 BTC saw Bitcoin fall more than 3% below $57,000 on the day of the move. The current BTC price drop follows an identical playbook.

Advertisement

The data verdict: this looks like pre-distribution staging, not an immediate market dump, but the market is not waiting for confirmation before repricing risk.

Discover: The Best Token Presales

The post Bitcoin Slumps Toward $69K as Mt. Gox Moves 10,422 BTC to Unmarked Wallets appeared first on Cryptonews.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Movement Gains Access to US, Canada, EU Payment Rails Amid Stablecoin Push

Published

on

Movement Gains Access to US, Canada, EU Payment Rails Amid Stablecoin Push

Movement, the Move-based blockchain network that has expanded into stablecoin payments and financial infrastructure, said it has gained access to licensed payment rails across the US, Canada and the EU, a move aimed at strengthening its cross-border payment offerings in emerging markets.

In a Tuesday announcement, Movement said it plans to use the payment infrastructure to connect traditional banking systems with stablecoin settlement networks, targeting cross-border transfers and treasury services in regions where payment costs remain high and financial access is limited.

Movement did not identify the partners or regulated entities that would enable its payment rail access. Still, the company said the infrastructure will enhance its ability to move funds between traditional payment networks and blockchain systems, with a focus on stablecoin-based settlement rather than fully crypto-native transfers.

The announcement also highlighted a token buyback tied to the company’s shift toward payments infrastructure. The Movement Network Foundation said it repurchased roughly 19% of tokens previously allocated to investors, representing about 4.2% of the token’s total supply.

Advertisement

MOVE token’s market capitalization has fallen from a peak of around $2.5 billion to around $54 million currently. Source: CoinMarketCap

Related: US lawmakers move to protect blockchain devs from prosecution

Stablecoins become a key growth area for blockchain networks

Movement’s pivot reflects a broader trend across the blockchain industry, where networks originally touted as smart-contract platforms are increasingly emphasizing stablecoin payments and financial infrastructure.

Solana, which initially gained traction through decentralized finance and consumer applications, has in recent months highlighted stablecoin payments and remittances as adoption grows. Polygon, an Ethereum layer-2 network, has also expanded its focus beyond scaling to support stablecoin settlement and payment-related initiatives.

Advertisement

Aptos, another blockchain built on the Move programming language, has similarly promoted payments, consumer finance and stablecoin use cases as part of its broader growth strategy.

The shift comes as stablecoins remain one of the digital asset industry’s fastest-growing sectors, particularly following the passage of the US GENIUS Act last year, which established a federal framework for payment stablecoins.

The total value of all stablecoins has eclipsed $320 billion. Source: DefiLlama

The growing focus on payments infrastructure also comes amid softer conditions across broader crypto markets. Global crypto transaction volume declined 11% year over year in the first quarter, according to TRM Labs, reflecting weaker market activity and cooling investor demand.

Advertisement

Related: Crypto Biz: Crypto infrastructure spending rises as ETF appetite cools

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Coinbase Backs IQMM ETF as Stablecoin Rules Take Shape

Published

on

Coinbase Backs IQMM ETF as Stablecoin Rules Take Shape

Crypto exchange Coinbase has invested in ProShares’ stablecoin-focused money market fund, betting that demand for stablecoin reserve-management products will grow as the recently enacted GENIUS Act formalizes the types of assets that can back US dollar-pegged tokens.

Coinbase (COIN) announced Tuesday that it made an undisclosed investment in the ProShares GENIUS Money Market ETF (IQMM), which is designed to hold assets that qualify as reserves for payment stablecoins under the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act.

The GENIUS Act requires stablecoin issuers to back their tokens with highly liquid assets, including cash, bank deposits and short-term US Treasury securities. IQMM was created to provide exposure to those types of reserve assets through a publicly traded fund structure.

Source: ProShares

Advertisement

Launched in February, IQMM invests exclusively in short-term US Treasury securities and cash-equivalent instruments with maturities of 93 days or less. According to ProShares, it’s one of the first exchange-traded funds tailored specifically for stablecoin reserve management.

Coinbase said the investment aligns with its growing stablecoin business and cash-management operations. As one of the primary infrastructure providers for Circle’s USDC (USDC), Coinbase has an interest in expanding the pool of regulated, liquid investment vehicles for managing stablecoin reserves.

Related: Movement expands stablecoin payments push with access to US, Canada, EU rails

CLARITY Act hangs in the balance as stablecoin yield debate intensifies

The passage of the GENIUS Act in June 2025 marked a major milestone in US stablecoin regulation, but lawmakers are still debating broader reforms to crypto market structure.

Advertisement

At the center of that effort is the Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act, which would establish rules governing digital asset markets and define the roles of federal regulators. The legislation gained momentum after lawmakers incorporated new stablecoin yield provisions, setting the stage for a broader debate over whether issuers should be allowed to pay interest on stablecoin holdings.

The bill advanced through the Senate Banking Committee last month, setting the stage for a full Senate floor vote. However, progress has been uneven, with some Democrats pushing for stronger ethics and conflict-of-interest provisions tied to digital assets.

In May, White House crypto adviser Patrick Witt said administration officials were targeting the period around the July 4 Independence Day holiday to advance crypto market-structure legislation. However, it remains unclear whether lawmakers can meet that timeline amid ongoing disagreements.

Coinbase’s chief policy officer, Faryar Shirzad, called the CLARITY Act the “biggest financial regulatory bill” since Dodd-Frank. Source: Fox Business

Advertisement

Much of the disagreement comes from the banking industry, which continues to voice strong opposition to the bill. Last week, JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon said banks would fight the legislation in its current form, arguing that allowing crypto firms to offer yield on stablecoin balances could create an uneven competitive landscape between banks and digital asset companies.

Related: Fed’s Barr backs stablecoin clarity but warns of run risks

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Charles Hoskinson on Fire as Cardano Faces ‘Wave of Shutdowns’, ADA Falls 10%

Published

on

Cardano (ADA) Price Performance

Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson lashed out at the network’s governance after TapTools said it would wind down within two weeks. The Hosky community followed with its own closure notice, though satirical.

Hoskinson predicted more failures in the second half of 2026, citing JX Door’s earlier collapse as a warning sign. Cardano (ADA) fell 6.5% to roughly $0.215 in the past 24 hours.

Cardano (ADA) Price Performance
Cardano (ADA) Price Performance. Source: Coingecko

TapTools and ‘Hosky’ Mark a Wider Shutdown Wave

TapTools served more than one million users and supported hundreds of projects through its API across four years. Earlier in 2026, two cofounders (the CTO and COO) departed.

A backend developer briefly stepped into the CTO role. However, that replacement has also moved on, leaving operational continuity in doubt.

TapTools said it remains open to acquisition or external funding.

Advertisement

The shutdown follows the earlier collapse of JX Door and highlights broader weakness in Cardano network activity.

“After four years of building for Cardano, today we have difficult news to share” the TapTools team stated.

TapTools was a leading Cardano analytics platform offering real-time token charts, portfolio tracking, NFT tools, and data API for over a million users.

The Hosky community echoed the same tone in a parallel post, framing its own wind-down with characteristic humor.

“After four years of storing for Cardano, today we have difficult news to share,” Hosky noted.

Hosky is a popular Cardano meme coin and community known for humorous projects, events, Rare Evo conference antics, and its infamous Las Vegas storage unit.

Advertisement

Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens

Hoskinson Vents Over Governance Paralysis

Hoskinson said he had proposed a sovereign wealth fund to backstop struggling projects. Cardano backers Wheel and Anderson rejected the idea, arguing it would damage ADA. The plan went nowhere.

He has since tried to acquire individual projects to keep them operational. Past deals include Nami and Block Frost.

However, the founder said the community criticizes him for centralizing the ecosystem each time he steps in.

Advertisement

Hoskinson maintained:

  • He holds no governance keys,
  • No treasury access, and
  • No power to initiate even a protocol parameter change.

He argued daily blame for the price of ADA falls on him despite that absence of authority.

His comments came alongside a broader Cardano governance overhaul aimed at internal conflict resolution.

A recent vote on the Singapore Summit treasury proposal was rejected by delegated representatives.

Hoskinson previously argued that continued votes against ecosystem funding could leave research labs facing collapse before mid-year.

Advertisement

He directly challenged delegated representatives to put forward an alternative plan.

“There are people that are legitimately deranged, deranged. The only purpose now is to kill me,” Hoskinson ranted.

Builders and ADA Price Slide

Cash Anvil, a community builder, said multiple teams have cut down to essentials. The builder warned that user numbers sit at all-time lows.

Cash Anvil also criticized funding decisions that approved proposals lacking overhead transparency.

ADA traded near $0.216 at the time of writing, ranking 16th by market capitalization at roughly $8 billion. The token has lost 14% over the past month and more than 68% over the past year.

Cardano Foundation reserves also dropped 45% earlier in 2026 as ADA prices slid.

Hoskinson predicted the second half of 2026 will be very hard.

He said more DeFi projects are expected to fail before any rebound.

Advertisement

Whether acquirers step in for TapTools or other Cardano teams may shape the tone for the rest of the year.

The post Charles Hoskinson on Fire as Cardano Faces ‘Wave of Shutdowns’, ADA Falls 10% appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Stellar CEO says Clarity Act would help, but tokenization isn’t dependent on It

Published

on

Stellar CEO says Clarity Act would help, but tokenization isn't dependent on It

Latest developments: Stellar Development Foundation CEO Denelle Dixon joined CoinDesk’s Public Keys and said DTCC’s selection of Stellar validates years of infrastructure built for institutional use.

  • DTCC recently chose Stellar as the first public blockchain connected to its upcoming tokenized securities settlement platform, Dixon said.
  • Stellar surpassed $1 billion in tokenized real-world assets in December and has since grown to roughly $3 billion in about five months, according to Dixon.
  • Dixon described the partnership as “the moment Stellar was built for” after more than a decade of focusing on compliance and institutional requirements.

What this means: Regulatory progress is helping institutions move from experimentation to deployment.

  • Dixon said the GENIUS Act gave financial institutions confidence that the U.S. government intends to support the industry through a clearer regulatory framework.
  • She noted that firms such as Franklin Templeton were already building tokenized products before recent legislation, citing the firm’s money market fund on Stellar.
  • While she said passage of the Clarity Act would benefit the industry, Dixon argued that tokenization adoption is unlikely to be derailed if the bill stalls.

Closer look: Stellar is positioning its technology stack around compliance, privacy and scalability for large financial institutions.

  • Dixon said Stellar has maintained 99.99.99% uptime and processes billions of transactions each quarter.
  • She emphasized that compliance tools were built into the network’s architecture, reducing the need for custom smart contracts to issue assets.
  • Stellar is also developing privacy features using a composable model that allows institutions to tailor controls to specific assets and use cases.

Reading between the lines: Massive transaction volumes remain a key test for blockchain-based financial infrastructure.

  • DTCC processed $4.7 quadrillion in securities transactions last year, highlighting the scale traditional market infrastructure already supports.
  • Dixon acknowledged that tokenized settlement volumes will ramp up gradually rather than reaching peak scale immediately.
  • She said maintaining reliability and avoiding network outages are critical requirements for institutional adoption.

Broader view: Dixon expects tokenized assets to be distributed across multiple public blockchains rather than concentrated on a single network.

  • She rejected the idea that one blockchain will dominate all institutional tokenization activity.
  • Instead, Dixon said a handful of networks will likely capture most real-world asset issuance based on their technical strengths.
  • She argued that open public blockchains will ultimately outperform closed alternatives because they evolve rapidly through global developer participation.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025