Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Politics

Trump set to shackle US economy to failing AI industry

Published

on

Donald Trump looking tired on Air Force One

Donald Trump looking tired on Air Force One

As we reported on 4 June, the AI bubble is inching ever closer to being popped. It may survive another week, however, because US president Donald Trump is talking about bailing out these failing AI companies:

It’s a move which runs the risk of shackling the US economy to the most expensive deadend in technological history.

Trump — Crash and burn

The latest issue for companies like OpenAI and Anthropic is that they’ve had to change their business model. These companies are looking to go public, which means they’ll have to give investors a better look at their underlying financials. This was a worry, because said companies have grossly under-charged their customers to try and get them hooked on AI.

Since increasing their prices, however, customers have been forced to analyse the benefits they’re getting from this suddenly expensive technology, and the answer has been ‘none whatsoever‘ or ‘we’re not even sure‘.

Advertisement

This has created a situation in which CEOs have had to compare hard-to-quantify benefits against suddenly astronomical charges:

Advertisement

Clearly, AI CEOs like Sam Altman hoped:

Advertisement
  • They could jack up the prices.
  • Businesses would absorb the costs.
  • They’d be able to show investors a path towards mega-profits.

That didn’t happen, so now they’re having to act like they don’t know what’s going on:

If you’re unfamiliar with AI beyond the noise, it’s important to remember that the technology we’re discussing – ‘generative AI’ – has failed to live up to the hype. Billionaire tech bros claimed they were on the verge of creating a digital god, and a compliant and un-curious media obediently repeated this nonsense.

Advertisement

Statistician Dr Kareem Carr summarised the issues with AI:

It’s not that AI can’t be used to do knowledge work. It’s that it’s wildly unreliable in bizarre and incomprehensible ways. Things you’d never think it could be possible to mess up are the things that it messes up.

Like you ask it download some data and do an analysis, and instead it just completely fabricates a fictional dataset for no reason, and gives you results based on that.

Fine if you catch it, but potentially career-ending if you don’t.

It inserts its own ideas without telling you. It deletes critical paragraphs.

Advertisement

These actions would be psychopathic in a colleague, but we’re just supposed to accept it because it’s a machine.

The path to profitability

Bugs and faults are one thing, but the truly important thing for our business overlords is that this tech isn’t increasing profitability. If anything, it’s achieving the opposite effect:

CEOs went all-in on AI because it sounded impressive, and the job of a CEO is to sound impressive. The reality is none of these people knew what they were doing, and now that AI is shown to be a curse on profitability, they’re going to drop AI as fast as they can.

And now we get to Trump.

Speaking on Air Force One, the president said:

Advertisement

There’s a concept out there, there’s so much money, and it’s so big that there are concepts where pieces could be given to the American public, where the American public essentially becomes a partner with the companies.

There’s certainly been a lot of money invested, but the AI companies receiving it have failed to turn a profit. And this was true even before they started shedding customers for being too expensive.

Trump added:

There’s something very interesting about it, where it almost becomes a partnership with the American public. We’ll look into that. We are looking. I actually have a meeting scheduled… with all of the companies. And we’re talking about it where the American people can benefit from the success of AI. And by doing that, they’re going to like it better. Which companies? All of them. All the big ones, yeah… They’re all coming to the White House, probably next week.

We talk about nationalising key utilities all the time; we don’t talk about nationalising AI, because it’s a novelty technology which is primarily useful for generating images of SpongeBob SquarePants doing crime:

Advertisement

Bailonomics

What Trump is proposing isn’t nationalisation; it’s a bailout.

Advertisement

It’s easy to see why the AI companies would want backing from the US government, given that they’re trying to make themselves look stable in the runup to going public. It’s less easy to see why the US public would want to own shares in an industry which could be worth nothing 12 months from now.

The thing to bear in mind is that Trump is surrounded by figures who stand to profit from AI going public, including Elon Musk and David Sacks. In other words, it looks very much like Trump is going to use the power of the White House to bail out his rich buddies.

Featured image via Samuel Corum (Getty Images)

By Willem Moore

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

Active Grandparenting Could Slow Brain Ageing

Published

on

Active Grandparenting Could Slow Brain Ageing

Not all of our dementia risk is in our control. But The Lancet’s standing commission on dementia previously found that 45% of factors that can increase our likelihood of developing the condition are “potentially modifiable”.

This includes things like not smoking, exercising more often, and controlling high blood pressure.

But these might not be the only ways to lower our risk of cognitive decline, sometimes seen as a precursor to dementia.

According to research published in Psychology and Ageing, being an active grandparent might slow brain ageing.

Advertisement

“Grandparents who provide care for their grandchildren tend to show better cognitive functioning than those who do not”

This paper looked at 2,887 grandparents aged 50+ (their average age was 67) who took part in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing.

Researchers asked participants to fill in questionnaires and take cognitive tests three times in the period from 2016-2022.

Questions centred on how active grandparents were in their grandchildren’s lives, including by watching them overnight, caring for them while ill, helping them with homework, playing with them, prepping meals for them, and more.

Advertisement

Generally, grandparents who provided childcare for their children’s children had better memory and verbal fluency results than those who didn’t. This association stood regardless of how often they cared for the kids or the type of care.

Grandmothers, but not grandfathers, who took care of their grandchildren saw less cognitive decline according to the study’s tests across the years than those who didn’t.

The paper read, “Grandparents who provide care for their grandchildren tend to show better cognitive functioning than those who do not. For grandmothers, these benefits also result in a slower cognitive decline later on.”

You don’t have to grandparent constantly to see benefits

Advertisement

The study stressed that providing childcare for grandkids at all, regardless of hours spent doing so, was linked to a lower risk of cognitive decline.

“What stood out most to us was that being a caregiving grandparent seemed to matter more for cognitive functioning than how often grandparents provided care or what exactly they did with their grandchildren,” study author and lead researcher Flavia Chereches told the American Psychological Association.

“More research is needed to replicate these findings, yet, if there are benefits associated with caregiving for grandparents, they might not depend on how often care is provided, or on the specific activities done with grandchildren, but rather on the broader experience of being involved with caregiving.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

A Guide To Postpartum Sex And The Best Sex Toys For New Parents

Published

on

A Guide To Postpartum Sex And The Best Sex Toys For New Parents

We hope you love the products we recommend! All of them were independently selected by our editors. Just so you know, HuffPost UK may collect a share of sales or other compensation from the links on this page if you decide to shop from them. Oh, and FYI — prices are accurate and items in stock as of time of publication.

You might be thinking: I’ve just had a f*cking baby, sex is the last thing I want to be thinking about right now. Or you could be thinking the opposite.

Either way, your path back to having sex after birth is completely your own. There’s no right or wrong way to do it.

But if you have questions, we’ve asked sex and relationships therapist Georgina Vass everything you need to know about starting to have sex again as new parents.

Advertisement

How soon is too soon?

While the NHS has little to no guidance on how long to wait until you can have sex after birth, around four to six weeks is a good benchmark.w

“Guidance varies, but for most births six weeks tends to be the recommendation of when one can medically return to penetrative sexual activity,” she says. “However, having the desire or feeling physically or emotionally ready to resume sexual activity may take much longer than six weeks.”

Research by Lovehoney last year found that 83% of women experience changes in their sexual function postpartum, including pain, libido drops, and body image concerns.

Advertisement

How will sex change after birth?

Naturally, these changes – not to mention the stress and fatigue of being responsible for a new life – can cause new parents to have less frequent sex.

“It usually requires more planning compared with before becoming parents,” Vass explains.

“Not only do some couples need to identify a time when they can both be available, but the logistics and changes in physical space may disrupt or diminish their capacity for private time.”

Advertisement

Intimacy is likely to look different when your little one arrives, which can take time to adjust to.

“Another common challenge is grappling with the shift in identity from parents/providers during the day to romantic partners in the bedroom, and this can take time to adjust to,” adds Vass.

How to explore sex again as new parents

However, intimacy doesn’t necessarily have to mean penetrative sex, or even sexual touching.

Advertisement

“Open communication about your desires, compassion for yourself and your partner, and prioritising time together as a couple are all important,” Vass advises.

“Invest in your relationship with your partner, whether that’s through arranging pressure relieving childcare, enjoying time as a couple on date nights or embracing forms of non-sexual intimacy like cuddling on the couch uninterrupted for an hour.”

When you’re ready to explore sex again, foreplay will be your best friend, says Vass.

“Once things become physical, enjoy generous foreplay or outercourse to re-familiarise yourselves with your bodies, gain comfort, and increase arousal,” she says.

Advertisement

“Moving slowly whether through prolonged foreplay or shallow and gentle penetration may be helpful to avoid discomfort. Using water-based lubrication may help with dryness, which can be common for new mothers.”

While it might take time for your sex life to feel normal again, remember: change is normal. “Becoming a parent has an impact on your body, and things may feel or look different to how they did before, but this time in your life is temporary and things are likely to change over time,” says Vass.

“Take the opportunity to discuss any concerns or questions with your medical provider, they may have useful information or helpful resources.”

Can I use sex toys after birth?

Advertisement

Just as intimacy with a partner will feel different, mothers could experience a changing relationship with their body. Masturbating or using a sex toy could help to reconnect.

“Sex toys can be used to reconnect with your body on your terms and explore new sensations,” says Vass.

“High-quality clean toys may work well for new mothers. Read reviews, check the materials of the toys, clean them thoroughly before use, go slowly and enjoy!”

Best sex toys for new parents to shop

Advertisement

If you’re thinking about exploring sex for the first time after birth, here are some of the best sex toys, lubes, salves, and toys to try.

Designed in collab with Mumsnet, this soft bullet vibrator is created specifically to be soft on new mums. As well as being coated in silky silicone, it comes with a gentle three vibration speeds and two patterns so it’s just the right intensity for postpartum sensitivity. Just as the name suggests, it’s whisper quiet, so you won’t disturb your little one. Plus, that tapered end means you can choose between more pinpoint stimulation or something broader, depending on what you’re ready for.

If there’s one thing Denmark does really well it’s sex – seriously, they’re one of the only countries where Gen Z is still having sex – so trust Danish sex brand Sitre to make water-based lube that’s skincare-grade. It’s not only pH-balanced, making it perfect for sensitive skin, but it’s blended with aloe vera to hydrate down there, too. Plus, water-based lube is compatible with sex toys.

Any time I have even minor discomfort on my vulva, I use this salve. It smells mighty herbal and leaves any itching, burning, or dryness feeling replenished in seconds, making it ideal to use after or before sex.

Things are likely to be a little numb down there for a while, but if you want to improve your pelvic floor muscles while also getting a little buzz down there, this trainer will whip you into shape in no time. It doesn’t require an app (because no one has time for that) but instead has eight training modes to work your way up through and sends a vibration out when you engage properly.

Can’t decide whether you want an external or internal toy? Don’t worry, this vibe from Dame can do it all, as that curved end is just as suitable for playing with your external erogenous zones as it is rubbing against your G-spot. Should you be after something that you can work towards, this is an ideal toy as you can get used to the intensity externally before delving in when you’re ready.

After a literal new human enters your life, it can be hard to find time to connect as a couple. To make a little game of it, Luxus has created a sex toy powered by the same technology as car sensors. Slip the ring over his thing-a-ling, and place the vibe over her clit (you can hold it in place with the finger grip, stickers, or harness) and it’ll vibrate more intensely the closer you move together. Or, change settings so it vibrates simply when it hears you clapping – I’ll leave you to figure that one out for yourself.

If you’re not ready for penetration, an external vibrator could pose a less threatening feat. This one from sexologist and engineer-founded brand Dame slots around your clit, with those little wings reaching around your labia for hands-free stimulation. With just three speeds, it’s not too powerful, and it’ll also make a great solo tool for when you next get some alone time…

Intimacy doesn’t have to involve direct genital stimulation, so if you’re looking for a low-pressure way to delve back in, a wand vibrator could introduce something new into your dynamic. Originally intended to be used as as neck massager (throwback to that iconic Sex and the City episode) their vibrations can be used all over the body, and this rechargeable one has a bendy neck and is completely cordless, so you can get into even the tightest of spots.

Whether you’re having penetrative sex or not, there’s no excuse like growing a human in your body to convince your partner to give you a full-body massage. These candles from Maude smell divine, and once lit they melt into a delightful body oil that can turn your regular night time routine into a bit of fun (and, hopefully, relaxation).

While this toy looks like it’d only be suitable for internal play, it’s time to use your imagination! Just like the Whisperer, this seven inch vibe won’t alert everyone in the surrounding area to your antics. Plus, its ribbed edges can be used to venture into penetration for the first time, or run across the outside of your vulva for added texture.

Don’t count out mutual masturbation – it can be a fun way to explore your body again while reigniting intimacy with your partner. This vibrating grinding pad will give them a real show, without the need for penetration, and you can even hand over the remote control for them to get in on the action, if you’re feeling generous.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Wes Streeting Compares Reform UK To Nazis Over Attack Ad

Published

on

Wes Streeting Compares Reform UK To Nazis Over Attack Ad

Wes Streeting has compared Reform UK to the Nazis over a controversial advert attacking Kemi Badenoch.

The former health secretary condemned a Reform social media post which suggested the Tory leader cared about black people, but not those who are white.

Streeting accused the right-wing party of spreading “propaganda that is reminiscent of the 1930s”.

The Reform ad showed a quote from 2020 in which Badenoch said “black lives do matter”, alongside a partial quote she gave this week in which she said “I don’t care about white lives matter”.

Advertisement

However, her full quote, which she gave in an interview on ITV’s Good Morning Britain, was: “I don’t want to hear about Black Lives Matter. I don’t want to hear about White Lives Matter. Everyone matters.”

On The News Agents podcast, Streeting said Reform had “sought to grossly and dangerously misrepresent” the Tory leader.

“She said ‘I don’t care about black lives matter, I don’t care about white lives matter, all lives matter’,” said Streeting. “She was really clear about that.

“Then an ad goes up that quotes what she said in 2022, ‘black lives do matter’, set against one part of what she said on breakfast television this week: ‘I don’t want to hear about white lives matter’.

Advertisement

“Those two sentences slapped on an ad with Kemi’s face and promoted across social media like wildfire.

“Why? Because they want people to believe that the black woman who leads the Conservative Party cares about black people, but doesn’t care about white lives.

“And that was dangerous, it was incendiary, and I don’t say this lightly, this is the type of propaganda that is reminiscent of the 1930s.

“And that is the choice for the country. You can have a politics that is decent, or you can have a politics that is about rage, that is about division, and seeks to foment and stir hatred to politically profit from it.

Advertisement

“It is dangerous, it is nationalistic and it has got to be beaten.”

Streeting said Reform leader Nigel Farage “is an English nationalist, and nationalism is a dangerous and potent political force”.

“I’m not saying Farage is a fascist, but I am saying he’s an English nationalist,” he added.

Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Andy Burnham Likely To Win Makerfield Seat

Published

on

Voters in Makerfield could be about to choose Britain's next prime minister.

First, we’ll start of with good news for Andy Burnham. It looks as though he is all-but certain to win the Makerfield by-election.

With less than a fortnight to go until polling day on June 18, opinion polls – and the increasingly-confident Labour campaign team – suggest he holds a comfortable lead over Reform UK’s Robert Kenyon.

The most recent survey of voter opinion in the constituency puts Burnham on 49%, fully 10 points ahead of Kenyon on 39%.

Barring an unforeseen crisis, and in politics that can never be ruled out entirely, the Greater Manchester mayor will soon return to Westminster after a nine-year hiatus.

Advertisement

We now know, as Burnham himself confirmed on Question Time on Thursday night, that he will then move quickly to replace Keir Starmer and become Britain’s next prime minister.

It would be the culmination of a lifetime’s ambition for the former cabinet minister, who has twice tried and failed to become Labour leader before.

Burnham, the so-called “King of the North”, has vowed to change both the Labour Party and the way politics is done at Westminster, with a greater emphasis on public control of essential services and an end to 40 years of Thatcherite neoliberal economic theory.

With just three years to go until the next general election – he has already ruled out going to the country early – he is clearly a man in a hurry.

Advertisement

But his eagerness to depose Starmer and seize the crown has not gone down well with many of the Labour MPs he will rely on to get his agenda through the Commons – and is storing up trouble for the future.

“He’s an arsehole,” one backbencher told HuffPost UK. “All Andy cares about is himself. Loyal, hardworking MPs don’t want to support a coup and will now not go campaigning for him in the by-election.”

Another MP said: “Those who had already decided not to go and campaign for him now have the perfect excuse.”

Burnham’s admission that he plans to challenge Starmer has “gone down like a lead balloon” in the Labour ranks, an MP said.

Advertisement

“I don’t understand why he’s in such a rush,” the MP said. “It would have been plausible for him to come back and be offered a role by Keir, but he’s obviously decided he doesn’t want to do that and instead wants to move against the PM as soon as he gets back.

“It’s typical of Andy to act without thinking it through. People are furious with him.”

A minister said: “Plausible deniability that he was after the leadership was at least making it feel like what he is doing was within the rules.

“Now every door we knock in Makerfield is contributing to the instability of the government.”

Advertisement

But a Burnham ally told HuffPost UK: “Its hardly news that Andy would want to enter a leadership contest should one arise.

“I don’t think many colleagues believed he’d be sitting on the backbenches if he wins this by election, so refusing to support this existential fight against Reform is pretty disingenuous.”

Burnham has insisted he is sticking by his pledge to end parliament’s whipping system, whereby party managers tell MPs which way to vote and discipline those who rebel.

Instead, he has said he will rely on the “collective wisdom” of Labour MPs, effectively allowing them to vote with their consciences rather than necessarily take the government line.

Advertisement

If he doesn’t want his agenda to be upended, therefore, he needs to get his own backbenchers onside from the start.

But one said: “If you are simultaneously saying you’ll ease off whipping and also angering your colleagues, that does not bode well for the future of a putative Burnham administration.”

Another backbencher said they expected any boost Labour receives from a new PM to be short-lived.

“We’ll get the briefest of bounces before people realise that Donald Trump, Elon Musk, Iran and Vladimir Putin have not changed,” he said.

Advertisement
Voters in Makerfield could be about to choose Britain's next prime minister.
Voters in Makerfield could be about to choose Britain’s next prime minister.

No.10 were quick to respond to Burnham’s Question Time announcement, insisting the PM will not “walk away” from the job he was elected to do in July, 2024.

“The country expects us to focus on governing and to deliver change for hardworking people, not get distracted by Westminster debates,” a Downing Street spokesperson said.

“The Labour Party has a process for challenging a leader and it has not been triggered.”

Former health secretary Wes Streeting, who quit the cabinet in the wake of Labour’s disastrous performance in the May 7 elections, has already said he will stand in any leadership contest.

Burnham appeared to use that as cover for his own leadership ambitions, telling the Question Time audience: “I think Wes Streeting seems to have launched a leadership contest, so if that is running, I would seek to join it.

Advertisement

“But I’d have to persuade members of the Parliamentary Labour Party to do the same. So that’s the only question.”

But an MP accused Burnham of “insulting our intelligence”.

“Wes doesn’t have the numbers and Andy has been planning this since the general election,” the MP said.

“We can all see as plain as day what’s happened and trying to imply it’s a response to what Wes has said is disgraceful.”

Advertisement

Another minister, however, said Labour MPs should park any reservations they have about Burnham and do everything they can to get him elected.

“The alternative is Reform winning the seat, and if that happens, we are totally fucked,” he said.

“Andy’s got a strong personal vote and a strong campaign message, that places like Makerfield have been forgotten about and he’s the man to change that.

“We need to get behind him, and whatever happens after that will take care of itself.”

Advertisement

Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Zia Yusuf gives Henry Nowak’s family two fingers with unbelievable claim

Published

on

Zia Yusuf or Reform UK and Laura Kuenssberg

Zia Yusuf or Reform UK and Laura Kuenssberg

Reform — On 2 June, Nigel Farage stoked racial tensions in the UK by encouraging “pure, cold rage” from his followers. He made his speech in response to the sentencing of Henry Nowak’s murderer. And he said what he said despite Nowak’s family requesting the case not be used to sow division.

Reform — Unbelievable

Henry Nowak was a young white man who was stabbed to death by a young Sikh man. The case attracted attention because footage of the incident showed police officers had handcuffed Nowak despite the man explaining he’d been stabbed. Far-right politicians like Farage leaped on this to suggest anti-white bias within the UK police forces. As we’ve reported, however, the officers’ behaviour is in line with the many recorded instances of police incompetence — one which the right has been happy to ignore until now.

The right is also ignoring the many decades of documented racism such as that reported in the 2023 Casey Review. They want people to believe the Nowak case invalidates all the evidence demonstrating that the police are structurally incompetent and institutionally racist. And they want people to believe that because they capitalise on driving division.

Speaking to Zia Yusuf in the above clip, Laura Kuenssberg asked:

Advertisement

My question to you is, what was more important to you as a party – making that political argument or respecting the wishes of a grieving family?

And I would say we’ve talked to the family’s representatives this weekend, and they have said they would like to reiterate that they did not want this to cause division in the last few days.

So what was more important to you as a party, making this political argument, as Nigel Farage did, within 24 hours, recording what he called an ’emergency address’ – making a very political point on a very sensitive issue where he said ‘we’re living in a two-tier culture’ in this country where the rights and privileges of white people matter less than those of ethnic minorities.

So I’ll ask you the same question again What was more important to you respecting the family’s wishes or making a political argument?

Showing his disdain for Nowak’s family and their wishes, Yusuf answered:

Advertisement

Respecting the family’s wishes, which is what we’ve done

Grim stuff

In the aftermath of Farage’s speech, Nowak’s family met with Keir Starmer and Kemi Badenoch. They did not meet with Nigel Farage. And we’d say the family will be increasingly unlikely to do so, given the way Reform is aggressively disrespecting their wishes.

Featured image via BBC

By Willem Moore

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Visa crisis threatens media coverage for the 2026 World Cup

Published

on

World Cup

World Cup

As FIFA continues to promote the 2026 World Cup as the most expansive and inclusive tournament in history, a new crisis has emerged that could overshadow the long-awaited event. The International Sports Press Association has warned of significant difficulties facing dozens of accredited journalists in securing visas to enter the United States.

In an official letter to FIFA media officials, the association revealed it has received an increasing number of complaints from accredited journalists—including a large group of Iranian journalists and those from various African nations—who have yet to secure the necessary visas, despite fulfilling all of the tournament’s media accreditation requirements.

FIFA accreditation is not enough

This issue highlights a recurring dilemma for media coverage of major sporting events in the United States: obtaining official FIFA accreditation does not automatically grant entry into the country. It remains subject to U.S. visa procedures and consular decisions.

The International Sports Press Association argues that this reality threatens the principle of equal opportunity for media outlets, particularly for news organizations from countries that already face travel restrictions or additional bureaucratic hurdles.

Advertisement

World Cup concerns over global coverage

The association warned that these ongoing obstacles could result in the absence of media voices from entire countries and regions at the world’s biggest football event. This would directly impact the diversity of media coverage and limit the ability of fans in certain nations to follow the tournament through their own local journalists and correspondents.

Furthermore, the association noted that the issue extends beyond administrative travel logistics, touching on a broader concern regarding free media access to global sporting events and ensuring that various nations are represented within the tournament’s media centers.

A call for urgent intervention

The AIPS has called on FIFA to intervene and engage with the relevant U.S. authorities to find practical solutions that ensure accredited journalists can obtain the necessary visas before the competition begins. The association emphasised that the success of the World Cup is measured not only by the number of participating teams or the size of the crowds, but also by the ability of media from all over the world to cover the event without hindrance.

These warnings come roughly a year before the start of the tournament — hosted by the United States, Canada, and Mexico—serving as an early indicator of potential organisational challenges for the largest edition of the World Cup in history, which will feature 48 teams for the first time.

Advertisement

Featured image via David Ramos/Getty Images

By Alaa Shamali

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

US denies visas to 15 members of Iran’s 2026 World Cup delegation

Published

on

World Cup

World Cup

Preparations for the Iranian national team’s participation in the 2026 World Cup have escalated into a tense political issue, following a visa crisis that triggered a diplomatic spat between Tehran and Washington. Meanwhile, the team continues its technical training, focusing away from the administrative turmoil.

For a long time, there were doubts and continuous discussions about whether the Iranian national team would participate in or withdraw from the 2026 World Cup due to the US war against Iran since last February.

Visa crisis brings politics back to the World Cup

While the Iranian national team players and technical staff received US entry visas for the tournament, 15 members of the administrative and organizational staff remained without approval. This led the Iranian Football Federation to accuse Washington of “discrimination and political interference in sports.”

In contrast, The Athletic quoted an American official confirming that the granted visas included only the “necessary” players and staff members, emphasising that the US “will not allow the tournament to be used as cover to bring in individuals who pose a security threat.”

Advertisement

The Iranian embassy in Turkey responded with an escalating tone, describing the incident as “deliberate and discriminatory treatment” against the national team’s delegation. Concurrently, the Iranian Football Federation demanded that FIFA intervene and open a formal investigation into the matter.

The Iranian Federation called the situation “political interference in sports in its worst form,” affirming that it will pursue the matter with FIFA as the organizing body of the tournament.

15 officials banned from the US

According to Tasnim News Agency, 15 members of the administrative delegation were denied visas, including prominent federation officials such as the Executive Director, Secretary-General, and Media Director.

While Iranian media sources confirmed that these individuals will head to Mexico to join the delegation, the national team continues to manage its logistical affairs away from the United States, as part of an alternative accommodation plan for the tournament.

Advertisement

Technically, the Iranian national team has been holding its training camp in Antalya, Turkey, since May 18. During this period, they played two friendly matches, winning against Gambia (3-1) and Mali (2-0), indicating a relative readiness ahead of the finals.

The team is scheduled to later move to Tijuana, Mexico, which they have chosen as their main headquarters during the tournament, in an effort to minimize their presence on American soil amid the ongoing political controversy surrounding the issue.

A tough group awaits Iran

The Iranian national team will compete in Group 7, facing New Zealand and Belgium in Los Angeles on June 15 and 21, respectively, before meeting the Egyptian national team in Seattle on June 26. This group appears to be among the most competitive in the tournament.

Featured image via Mohamed Farag/Getty Images

Advertisement

By Alaa Shamali

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Adrienne Bailon-Houghton Reflects On ’Cheetah Girls’ & Motherhood

Published

on

Adrienne Bailon-Houghton Reflects On ’Cheetah Girls’ & Motherhood

!function(n){if(!window.cnx){window.cnx={},window.cnx.cmd=[];var t=n.createElement(‘iframe’);t.display=’none’,t.onload=function(){var n=t.contentWindow.document,c=n.createElement(‘script’);c.src=”//cd.connatix.com/connatix.player.js”,c.setAttribute(‘async’,’1′),c.setAttribute(‘type’,’text/javascript’),n.body.appendChild(c)},n.head.appendChild(t)}}(document);(new Image()).src=”https://capi.connatix.com/tr/si?token=19654b65-409c-4b38-90db-80cbdea02cf4″;cnx.cmd.push(function(){cnx({“playerId”:”19654b65-409c-4b38-90db-80cbdea02cf4″,”mediaId”:”1385bd8a-bf22-4eaf-9616-b8c4f25c8d38″}).render(“6a231114e4b0d8021c9fda85”);});

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

JD Vance Blames Migrant Invasion For Henry Nowaks Murder

Published

on

JD Vance Blames Migrant Invasion For Henry Nowaks Murder

JD Vance has blamed “the mass invasion of migrants” for the murder of Henry Nowak.

The US vice-president said the teenager’s death “is as tragic as it is enraging” in a thinly-veiled attack on Keir Starmer’s government.

Eighteen-year-old Henry was handcuffed and arrested by police as he lay dying after being wrongly accused of racism by his killer, Vickram Digwa.

Digwa, who is a British-born Sikh, was jailed for life with a minimum term of 21 years at Southampton Crown Court on Monday.

Advertisement

The case has sparked a furious political row, with Reform UK leader Nigel Farage being condemned by the PM and Kemi Badenoch for claiming it is proof of “two-tier policing” in the UK.

In a post on X, vance said: “Henry Nowak died the same way a civilisation dies: abandoned, handcuffed by authorities who neither trusted nor cared for him, and accused of hate crimes he did not commit.

“His murder is as tragic as it is enraging. He should still be alive today, and he would be if the last few generations of European elites had stood their ground against the politics of self-hatred and the mass invasion of migrants, many of whom despise the West and the people who love it.

“Henry was far from the first to so needlessly lose his life, and I fear he won’t be the last. Each time a life like his is lost, the proper response—the only response—is righteous anger.

Advertisement

“One of the most important things the Trump administration has proven to the world is that stopping the flow of mass migration and defending national sovereignty is a matter of political will and leadership. Anything else is an excuse.

“It is because we love the West that we want to preserve it. We love our civilisation. We love our country. We love our children. And nobody—nobody—should ever die the way that Henry Nowak died. May God comfort those who loved him, and may God rest his soul.”

Responding to Vance’s intervention, a Downing Street spokesperson said: “In recent days we have seen people trying to interfere in our democracy and seeking to stir up division on our streets.

Advertisement

″“The Nowak family are grieving after Henry’s horrific murder. They have said they do not want his death to be used to create further division, hatred or tension. We should be respecting their wishes.

“Our politics should bring people together even in the most terrible of circumstances. That is who we are as a country.”

Vance’s comments came after the US State Department also waded into the row.

In a post on X, they said: “Ideological conditioning and two-tiered policing are glaring symptoms of civilisational decline. They must be rejected across the West.”

Advertisement

Liberal Democrat foreign affairs spokesperson Calum Miller said the prime minister should summon the US ambassador to Downing Street to explain the State Department’s comments.

He said: “The Trump administration should not be using the tragic murder of Henry Nowak as a political football.

“This is flagrant foreign interference that seeks to fan the flames of division.”

Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

No 10 Accuses JD Vance Of Interfering In UK Democracy

Published

on

No 10 Accuses JD Vance Of Interfering In UK Democracy

Downing Street has accused JD Vance of “interference in our democracy” as an extraordinary war of words erupted over the murder of Henry Nowak.

No.10 hit back at the US vice-president after he said the teenager’s death was caused by “the mass invasion of migrants”.

Eighteen-year-old Henry was handcuffed and arrested by police as he lay dying after being wrongly accused of racism by his killer, Vickram Digwa.

Digwa, who is Sikh, was jailed for life with a minimum term of 21 years at Southampton Crown Court on Monday.

Advertisement

The case has sparked a furious political row, with Reform UK leader Nigel Farage being condemned by Keir Starmer and Kemi Badenoch for claiming it is proof of “two-tier policing” in the UK.

In a post on X, Vance said: “Henry Nowak died the same way a civilisation dies: abandoned, handcuffed by authorities who neither trusted nor cared for him, and accused of hate crimes he did not commit.

“His murder is as tragic as it is enraging. He should still be alive today, and he would be if the last few generations of European elites had stood their ground against the politics of self-hatred and the mass invasion of migrants, many of whom despise the West and the people who love it.

“Henry was far from the first to so needlessly lose his life, and I fear he won’t be the last. Each time a life like his is lost, the proper response—the only response—is righteous anger.”

Advertisement

His comments echoed those of Farage, who called for “pure, cold anger” in response to Henry’s death.

Hours later, police were pelted with missiles by protesters after violence erupted outside Southampton Police Station.

Starmer has also accused X owner Elon Musk of trying to “trying to whip up division” over his comments on the Henry Nowak case.

Responding to Vance, a No.10 spokesperson said: “In recent days we have seen people trying to interfere in our democracy and seeking to stir up division on our streets.

Advertisement

“The Nowak family are grieving after Henry’s horrific murder. They have said they do not want his death to be used to create further division, hatred or tension. We should be respecting their wishes.

“Our politics should bring people together even in the most terrible of circumstances. That is who we are as a country.”

The row is the latest example of the ill-feeling that exists between the Trump administration and the UK government.

Deep splits have erupted in recent months over the Iran war, after Starmer initially refused American jets permission to launch attacks from RAF air bases.

Advertisement

Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025