This article contains spoilers for the most recent episode of Rivals.

The second season of Rivals has arguably been an even bigger hit than the first.

So far, critics are loving it – and fans are loving it even more thanks to the steamy affairs, swooning romances and dramatic feuds that have unfolded in the new episodes .

However, fans have now been left reeling at the news that Rivals is taking a mid-season break.

It had previously been announced that Disney+ would be splitting season two of the Jilly Cooper adaptation into two separate sex-episode halves, with Friday’s instalment the last to come before the show’s months-long hiatus.

As fans contemplate when they will next see David Tennant’s Tony, Danny Dyer’s Freddie and Alex Hassell’s Rupert Campbell-Black again, here’s what we know about the return of Rivals …

Episode six of the second season of Rivals ended on a huge cliffhanger, with a tragic death in the Baddingham family and a reignited affair between Lizzie and Freddie.

As a result, we’re already itching to know exactly what’s going to happen next.

The show’s writer, Laura Wade, hinted to TechRadar that this cliffhanger was exactly why such a frustrating wait between episodes six and seven of Rivals was introduced.

Prepare yourself, as the writer teases that these shockers are just the tip of the iceberg for what’s to come.

“We’ve got some really huge story moments coming up later in the series and it’d be lovely for those bits of story to just have a moment to sink in with viewers, building up some anticipation,” she explained.

Laura added: “There’s a massive plot twist at the end of episode six. I think that’s when we break off for four or five months. But I think that will keep people thinking, talking and arguing about what’s going to happen next… in a very good way.”

The woman behind bringing our favourite characters to life explained that Rivals’ producers wanted to “drag out that enjoyment a little bit” and leave fans wanting more.

But Laura also has a more practical reason for why the show is having such a long hiatus

“Also, we’ve got the Fifa World Cup coming up, so we’re releasing the first half before the football,” she pointed out. “Get that out of the way, and then release the second half.”

We know season two of Rivals consists of 12 episodes, but Disney+ has yet to release news on when we can watch the remaining six.

However, what we do know is that we can likely expect the remaining episodes to land after the World Cup, which finishes mid-July and in the Autumn period.

Rumours have suggested we could be waiting as long as October, with the writers telling Film Hounds they expect episode 12 to come in December.

Laura explained to Tech Radar that the first part of season two of Rival had “spring like stuff” and that the second half has “autumnal vibes”.

“On screen, it runs into Christmas, which allows us to sort of parcel it out for everybody to savour the story,” she said, hinting at the time period of part two of series two of Rivals.

Rivals is available to stream on Disney+ now.

We hope you love the products we recommend! All of them were independently selected by our editors. Just so you know, HuffPost UK may collect a share of sales or other compensation from the links on this page if you decide to shop from them. Oh, and FYI — prices are accurate and items in stock as of time of publication.

Not all of our dementia risk is in our control. But The Lancet’s standing commission on dementia previously found that 45% of factors that can increase our likelihood of developing the condition are “potentially modifiable”.

This includes things like not smoking, exercising more often, and controlling high blood pressure.

But these might not be the only ways to lower our risk of cognitive decline, sometimes seen as a precursor to dementia.

According to research published in Psychology and Ageing, being an active grandparent might slow brain ageing.

This paper looked at 2,887 grandparents aged 50+ (their average age was 67) who took part in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing.

Researchers asked participants to fill in questionnaires and take cognitive tests three times in the period from 2016-2022.

Questions centred on how active grandparents were in their grandchildren’s lives, including by watching them overnight, caring for them while ill, helping them with homework, playing with them, prepping meals for them, and more.

Generally, grandparents who provided childcare for their children’s children had better memory and verbal fluency results than those who didn’t. This association stood regardless of how often they cared for the kids or the type of care.

Grandmothers, but not grandfathers, who took care of their grandchildren saw less cognitive decline according to the study’s tests across the years than those who didn’t.

The paper read, “Grandparents who provide care for their grandchildren tend to show better cognitive functioning than those who do not. For grandmothers, these benefits also result in a slower cognitive decline later on.”

The study stressed that providing childcare for grandkids at all, regardless of hours spent doing so, was linked to a lower risk of cognitive decline.

“What stood out most to us was that being a caregiving grandparent seemed to matter more for cognitive functioning than how often grandparents provided care or what exactly they did with their grandchildren,” study author and lead researcher Flavia Chereches told the American Psychological Association.

“More research is needed to replicate these findings, yet, if there are benefits associated with caregiving for grandparents, they might not depend on how often care is provided, or on the specific activities done with grandchildren, but rather on the broader experience of being involved with caregiving.”

Wes Streeting has compared Reform UK to the Nazis over a controversial advert attacking Kemi Badenoch.

The former health secretary condemned a Reform social media post which suggested the Tory leader cared about black people, but not those who are white.

Streeting accused the right-wing party of spreading “propaganda that is reminiscent of the 1930s”.

The Reform ad showed a quote from 2020 in which Badenoch said “black lives do matter”, alongside a partial quote she gave this week in which she said “I don’t care about white lives matter”.

However, her full quote, which she gave in an interview on ITV’s Good Morning Britain, was: “I don’t want to hear about Black Lives Matter. I don’t want to hear about White Lives Matter. Everyone matters.”

On The News Agents podcast, Streeting said Reform had “sought to grossly and dangerously misrepresent” the Tory leader.

“She said ‘I don’t care about black lives matter, I don’t care about white lives matter, all lives matter’,” said Streeting. “She was really clear about that.

“Then an ad goes up that quotes what she said in 2022, ‘black lives do matter’, set against one part of what she said on breakfast television this week: ‘I don’t want to hear about white lives matter’.

“Those two sentences slapped on an ad with Kemi’s face and promoted across social media like wildfire.

“Why? Because they want people to believe that the black woman who leads the Conservative Party cares about black people, but doesn’t care about white lives.

“And that was dangerous, it was incendiary, and I don’t say this lightly, this is the type of propaganda that is reminiscent of the 1930s.

“And that is the choice for the country. You can have a politics that is decent, or you can have a politics that is about rage, that is about division, and seeks to foment and stir hatred to politically profit from it.

“It is dangerous, it is nationalistic and it has got to be beaten.”

Streeting said Reform leader Nigel Farage “is an English nationalist, and nationalism is a dangerous and potent political force”.

“I’m not saying Farage is a fascist, but I am saying he’s an English nationalist,” he added.

Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

First, we’ll start of with good news for Andy Burnham. It looks as though he is all-but certain to win the Makerfield by-election.

With less than a fortnight to go until polling day on June 18, opinion polls – and the increasingly-confident Labour campaign team – suggest he holds a comfortable lead over Reform UK’s Robert Kenyon.

The most recent survey of voter opinion in the constituency puts Burnham on 49%, fully 10 points ahead of Kenyon on 39%.

Barring an unforeseen crisis, and in politics that can never be ruled out entirely, the Greater Manchester mayor will soon return to Westminster after a nine-year hiatus.

We now know, as Burnham himself confirmed on Question Time on Thursday night, that he will then move quickly to replace Keir Starmer and become Britain’s next prime minister.

It would be the culmination of a lifetime’s ambition for the former cabinet minister, who has twice tried and failed to become Labour leader before.

Burnham, the so-called “King of the North”, has vowed to change both the Labour Party and the way politics is done at Westminster, with a greater emphasis on public control of essential services and an end to 40 years of Thatcherite neoliberal economic theory.

With just three years to go until the next general election – he has already ruled out going to the country early – he is clearly a man in a hurry.

But his eagerness to depose Starmer and seize the crown has not gone down well with many of the Labour MPs he will rely on to get his agenda through the Commons – and is storing up trouble for the future.

“He’s an arsehole,” one backbencher told HuffPost UK. “All Andy cares about is himself. Loyal, hardworking MPs don’t want to support a coup and will now not go campaigning for him in the by-election.”

Another MP said: “Those who had already decided not to go and campaign for him now have the perfect excuse.”

Burnham’s admission that he plans to challenge Starmer has “gone down like a lead balloon” in the Labour ranks, an MP said.

“I don’t understand why he’s in such a rush,” the MP said. “It would have been plausible for him to come back and be offered a role by Keir, but he’s obviously decided he doesn’t want to do that and instead wants to move against the PM as soon as he gets back.

“It’s typical of Andy to act without thinking it through. People are furious with him.”

A minister said: “Plausible deniability that he was after the leadership was at least making it feel like what he is doing was within the rules.

“Now every door we knock in Makerfield is contributing to the instability of the government.”

But a Burnham ally told HuffPost UK: “Its hardly news that Andy would want to enter a leadership contest should one arise.

“I don’t think many colleagues believed he’d be sitting on the backbenches if he wins this by election, so refusing to support this existential fight against Reform is pretty disingenuous.”

Burnham has insisted he is sticking by his pledge to end parliament’s whipping system, whereby party managers tell MPs which way to vote and discipline those who rebel.