George Clooney has cast his lot with a particular actor for the highly coveted role of James Bond.
The Hollywood veteran, known for his acting and directorial achievements, recently weighed in on the next agent 007. The “Fantastic Mr. Fox” star had high praise for a man he once worked with.
The next James Bond actor has remained an open topic for years since the former star, Daniel Craig, stepped down from the role after the 2021 installment “No Time to Die.”
Advertisement
Xavier Collin/Image Press Agency/MEGA
Clooney made his allegiance known in a new interview, revealing that he is rooting for Dua Lipa’s husband, Callum Turner, to be the next Bond. The rising actor won Clooney’s heart when he starred in the 2023 movie, “The Boys in the Boat,” which the Hollywood veteran produced and directed.
Given their history, Clooney argued that Turner would make the perfect candidate for the Bond franchise. “I hope Callum ends up being the next Bond. I think he would be a great Bond,” he told Hollywood Reporter, adding:
“He’s tall and handsome and charming and British, so he’s the perfect guy to do it.”
Callum Turner Has All The Qualities The Oscar Winner Likes
MEGA
Clooney’s praises continued, with the director hailing Turner for choosing quality over “easy paychecks” when it came to his roles. He noted Turner had “done really interesting work” and managed to showcase his prowess as an actor while avoiding Hollywood drama.
“Somehow Callum has weaved his way through all of the noise and found a place where people look at him and go, ‘There’s something with this young man,’” Clooney said. He stated that it was “exciting” watching people pay closer attention to Turner.
Clooney reiterated that Turner had what it took to be a leading man. Filmmaker Will Gluck echoed similar sentiments about Turner’s qualities as a lead actor. “If you’re a guy like Callum who is really funny while also physical, and can be an action-movie hero — those are the ingredients that we used to have in movie stars,” Gluck declared.
Idris Elba Isn’t Rooting For A ‘Woke’ Bond Franchise
Eric Kowalsky / MEGA
While Clooney is rooting for Turner to be the next Bond, fans have placed bets against him, Aaron Taylor-Johnson, Harris Dickinson, and Jacob Elordi. Before these rising stars in the industry became fan favorites for the next agent 007, many had been calling for Idris Elba.
The Hollywood heartthrob’s name made waves for some time as the perfect candidate to take over Craig’s legacy, but Elba did not share the same sentiments. In an interview with GQ published on June 8, Elba stressed that he was not on board with changing the character’s race, saying:
Advertisement
“Bond is so unrealistic, so a hint of reality is good, but let’s not try and make it woke. I think you’ve got to be pure to what it is: escapism. Don’t try and answer the world’s taste. Just be Bond.”
The ‘Hobbs & Shaw’ Star Doesn’t Want A Black Person For The Role
Rudy Torres/Image Press Agency/MEGA
Elba confessed that he was flattered that many had considered him a good Bond candidate, but he did not believe a Black person should continue the franchise. He argued that Bond “was written how he was written for a reason” and realistically, some markets prefer it that way.
“Bond is big all over the world. And [audiences] won’t [all] go for a black male, an African male, playing Bond. That’s not what they like in their culture. Period,” Elba explained. Despite arguing that a black person shouldn’t play the predominantly white character, Elba changed his tune for another movie.
The veteran actor landed the part of Man-at-Arms in 2026’s “Masters of the Universe,” a cartoon character known for its ginger mustache. Elba joked that the character looked nothing like him, but he did not mind taking the role because “Man-At-Arms could be any color! He’s got green legs, for God’s sake!”
Daniel Craig Doesn’t Care Who Picks Up The Mantle Of James Bond
MEGA
While Elba believes a Black man shouldn’t be the next Bond, Craig, on the other hand, isn’t bothered. In a 2024 interview with Variety, the actor was asked whom he would like to portray Agent 007, but he bluntly replied, “I don’t care.”
Craig never expected to play Bond as long as he did, previously confessing in a 2022 interview that he thought it would be one movie. When he found out there were five installments to complete, Craig dropped a shocking request.
According to the “Spectre” star, he, the franchise’s producer Barbara Broccoli, said that he wanted to kill off his character by the end of the fifth movie, and she agreed. Craig’s wish came true in 2021 when his on-screen persona died a heroic death, per the U.K.’s The Times.
Us Weekly has affiliate partnerships. We receive compensation when you click on a link and make a purchase. Learn more!
I spent a week exploring the ritziest neighborhoods in London, all overflowing with rich moms. Whether walking at the park, eating brunch or sipping coffee in a cafe, these ladies had incredibly similar styles. Their formula consisted of a neutral top and tailored-looking jeans, and I found 11 chic pairs that nail the aesthetic!
Not only are they much classier than wide legs, but straight legs can be much more flattering, making your silhouette appear longer and leaner without even trying. Rich moms are always a step ahead of the fashion game, so it’s only a matter of time until we follow suit. Snag the classy look below!
Advertisement
11 Chic Straight-Leg Jeans London Moms Are Wearing — From $16
1. Everyday Staple: Frayed hems and built-in tummy control give these retro-inspired pants that lived-in look without sacrificing structure. The shaping panel smooths everything out, so tuck in a blouse and call it done.
2. Luxe Levi’s: These Ribcage Straight jeans sit a full inch above your belly button, ensuring you look snatched from every angle. Levi’s classic denim holds its shape from morning meetings through dinner.
3. Cool Mom: With a deep, saturated indigo color, these rich blue jeans should cost triple the price. No fading, no pilling, just clean color that pairs with everything in your closet.
4. Bestseller Alert: Thousands of reviewers give these straight-leg pants five stars, so it’s no wonder they’re flying off the shelves. The double-button waist holds you in through workdays, weekend errands and beyond.
Advertisement
5. Feeling Lucky: Lucky Brand has been a key denim player for decades, and these mid-rise wonders prove why. Expect a soft, broken-in feel from the first wear.
Long-haul flights mean people-watching, which is especially fun at airports in London, Paris and other ritzy European spots. Connecting flights have brought me everywhere lately, and no matter where I go, rich moms wear the same 17 outfit set styles. I found them all on Amazon, and the chicest finds start at just $8! These […]
Advertisement
6. Yoga Mom: Pull-on construction makes these comfy faux jeans look like sweatpants, but read like real denim. The dark wash keeps things polished — no zippers or buttons required.
7. Simple Stunner: Keep these budget-friendly straight-legs in rotation for brunches and last-minute errands. At this price, you can grab two washes and still snag a top.
8. Secretly Stretchy: These cropped camel-colored jeggings could totally pass as denim, but move like your favorite leggings. The length hits right above the ankle, so go ahead and show off your sandals.
9. Deep Blue: Light-wash denim can feel too casual for dinner out. These deep blue jeans dress up instantly with heels and a blazer (while still working with sneakers on Saturday mornings).
Advertisement
10. Mini Crop: These slightly cropped Levi’s hit right at your ankle, lengthening your leg line without going full ankle-grazer. Better yet, the durable Levi’s fabric lasts wash after wash.
11. Curve-Friendly: Cut with extra room through the hips and thighs, these curve-friendly jeans solve your gapping woes. The straight leg balances your curves.
If you dream of having a wardrobe filled with Aritzia clothing pieces, same. But why drop your entire paycheck if you don’t have to? We found 13 Aritzia-style gems hiding in Amazon’s Hot New Releases section, and we seriously can’t tell the difference. Somehow, they’re all under $30! With clean lines, rich neutral colors and […]
A major federal ruling involving the Trump administration is putting a spotlight on what can—and cannot—be removed from public history spaces, and U.S. District Judge Angel Kelley is at the center of the decision that has sparked national attention over how America’s past is presented in national parks and monuments.
Judge Orders Slavery And Climate Exhibits Restored In Parks
On Friday, Judge Angel Kelley issued a preliminary injunction ordering the Trump administration to restore exhibits and signage related to slavery and climate change that had previously been removed from national parks. The court noted the removals appeared to be tied to materials that “do not align with its preferred narrative,” according to the ruling. The decision came after a coalition of conservationists, historians, and scientific organizations challenged the policy in court.
Court Battle Details Claims Of History Erasure Campaign
The case centered on claims that the U.S. Department of the Interior had engaged in what plaintiffs described as a “sustained campaign to erase history and undermine science,” pointing to widespread changes across multiple sites. The ruling effectively halts parts of a broader policy linked to a March 2025 executive order from Donald Trump that directed revisions to historical and scientific content displayed in national parks.
According to documentation cited in the case, dozens of exhibits were impacted. This includes materials referencing slavery and enslaved people across multiple national parks. Climate-related displays are also affected, covering topics such as glacial retreat, rising sea levels, shifting weather patterns, and environmental risks to wildlife habitats. Furthermore, these exhibits are now ordered to be reinstated. Some of those signs were flagged, while others were fully removed across multiple historic and natural sites nationwide.
Advertisement
Trump Got The Comments Flooded With Mixed Reactions
As soon as the news hit, folks ran straight to The Shade Room’s Instagram comment section and were all over the place with reactions. Some users claimed the timing felt significant, saying it was “just in time for Juneteenth.” Meanwhile, others took a more spiritual route, calling it “from the ancestors.” And of course, a few admitted the post caught them off guard entirely, initially thinking it was announcing something else altogether.
One Instagram user @blaqbuety shared, “Our Ancestors said… wait.. wait.. wait a minute 💪🏿👏🏿👏🏿🙏🏿❤️🎯”
This Instagram user @therealmalikhall said, “Please Protect That Judge 🙏🏽”
And, Instagram user @daniellealexisb claimed, “Right in time for Juneteenth 🕺🏽💃🏾”
Advertisement
Meanwhile, Instagram user @davydpapi added, “American history will not be erased“
While Instagram user @bando_tez wrote, “You know what 😒…. Nvm don’t even worry about it but that’s cool too ✌🏾”
This Instagram user @karimellis2.0 said, “Reverse. Draw Four. Uno Out!!!“
Instagram user @d.lei.d added, “Thought he got up outta here 😂”
Advertisement
This Instagram user @dougiecash asked, “Why are people acting surprised. Most of the nonsense he did will revert back now or after he leaves office“
This Instagram user @ataviaab shared, “yeah cause wtf was that abt.“
Lastly, Instagram user @lorissa.alexis commented, “Love that a BLACK WOMAN got this done! 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽”
Us Weekly has affiliate partnerships. We receive compensation when you click on a link and make a purchase. Learn more!
Whether Taylor Swift is sitting courtside at a Knicks game or grabbing dinner with fiancé Travis Kelce, the singer is always dressed to the nines. She has a way of mixing together effortless, cool-girl style with timeless pieces, making her outfits feel actually attainable. That statement even rings true when it comes to her latest wedding guest ensemble that made Us want to book a trip to the coast — and it all has to do with her heeled sandals from Reformation.
Wedding guest dresses are usually the most eye-catching part of any look, but Swift proves that your shoes can sometimes make a bigger statement. While attending a wedding in Greece for George Karlaftis and Kaia Harris, the singer wore straight-up designer items that would cost you a pretty penny. The exception? These Reformation heeled sandals that totally embody coastal-chic style, and they’re still in stock in her exact color (for now).
Advertisement
Get the Waldena Block Heeled Mules for $268 at Reformation! Please note, prices are accurate as of the publishing date but are subject to change.
The Reformation Waldena Block Heeled Mules are so on trend for the summer, giving complete oceanic vibes with the shell ‘strap’ design and sandy beige hue. The sandals paired perfectly with Swift’s Zimmerman midi dress, Steven Battelle coin pendant and dangly De Beers earrings. And although all those high-end pieces are out of our budget, we’d happily invest in the star’s exact heeled sandals that look like a luxury designer find, but are listed at a fraction of the price.
Taylor Swift and the color red go together like peanut butter and jelly. The showgirl is known for her signature red lipstick and frequently integrates the bold hue into her wardrobe. Case in point, she just stepped out in buckle-style sandals for a stroll through Manhattan, and the romantic pair had burning red details we […]
In addition to the elegant seashell design, we love the slender silhouette, peep-toe opening and low heel that’s ideal for dancing the night away. Psst, the block heel is just 2 inches high! The sandals also have a heel cushion that provides a comfortable feel while at the ceremony and during the reception thereafter. Read: There’s no reason to walk around barefoot while stunning in these sandals.
You can choose between shades like elegant black and cute light blue, but if you want to truly channel The Life of a Showgirl singer, go with the beachy cream puff option. The neutral color goes with everything from casual mini dresses, satin maxi skirts, wide-leg trousers or wedding guest dresses à la Swift. Honestly, you could probably wear a burlap bag and still get tons of compliments when you slip on these Reformation sandals.
Now’s your chance to get the same exact heeled Reformation sandals that have Swift’s stamp of approval. The only issue is grabbing a pair before they’re gone. If we’ve learned anything, it’s that once the singer wears something, the item won’t be in stock for long.
Advertisement
Get the Waldena Block Heeled Mules for $268 at Reformation! Please note, prices are accurate as of the publishing date but are subject to change.
Wedding season is upon us, and many of us will soon find ourselves cheering for the newlyweds and biting into heavily frosted cake. But until then, the big question remains: what will you wear? While you may have your dress on lock, the shoes to complete your look are an entirely different story, because standing […]
If there’s one weekend this summer you need to spend all your time at home, it’s this one.
Major streamers like Netflix, Prime Video and more have just dropped some of the season’s can’t-miss shows, which is why Watch With Us had to cancel our wedding yet again to make time to watch all of them.
There’s also a slew of new shows that will make you beg for more seasons, like Prime Video’s hit YA adaptation Every Year After and HBO Max’s queer coming-of-age tale, Proud.
Advertisement
‘Sweet Magnolias’ Season 5 – Netflix
Brook Elliott, Heather Headley, JoAnna Garcia Swisher in Sweet Magnolias season 5Netflix
The Magnolias are back, and this season, they’re ditching the Deep South for the Big Apple. Well, kinda – bride-to-be Helen (Heather Headley) needs a fancy wedding dress, and only Fifth Avenue can satisfy her cravings for haute couture bridal gowns. Meanwhile, Maddie’s (JoAnna Garcia Swisher) dream job at a Manhattan publisher turns into a nightmare, and she is soon booking a return trip home.
Prime Video is investing in love with a wide variety of steamy rom-coms, star-studded TV shows coming this year— and a fan event to celebrate the upcoming YA titles. The streaming service announced on Thursday, April 30, that Prime Video was branching out with Obsessed Fest, which is described as “an inaugural summer tentpole event […]
Relax, fans – Sweet Magnolias is still largely set in Serenity, that cozy, too-good-to-be-real small town that makes Stars Hollow seem like San Francisco. Helen’s upcoming nuptials provide some of the drama, as does Dana Sue’s (Brooke Elliott) increasingly troubled marriage to hubby Ronnie (Brandon Quinn). Yet no matter what life serves them, the Magnolia ladies can rely on each other to weather any storm – and disappointing men – that cross their paths.
Advertisement
‘Every Year After’ Season 1 – Prime Video
Sadie Soverall as Percy Fraser and Matt Cornett as Sam Florek.Cate Cameron/Prime
It’s a new month, which means there’s another Prime Video adaptation of a massively popular YA novel to bingewatch. After last month’s hit hockey romance Off Campus, the streamer dropped the puck-less Canadian love story Every Year After, based on Carley Fortune’s bestselling novel, Every Summer After. It’s just as addictive as Off Campus, except it’s a little more serious than its YA peer.
Barry’s Bay is a picture-perfect small town, so why has Percy (Sadie Soverall) been away for almost a decade? Something drove her away, and it has to do with childhood crush Sam (Matt Cornett). When her mother, Sue (Elisha Cuthbert), dies, Percy has no choice but to go back to her hometown and face some demons from her past. Will she see Sam again? Does she even want to?
‘Proud’ Season 1 – HBO Max
Live fast, party hard – if Filip (Ignacy Liss), the main character in the new Polish-language series Proud, had a motto, that would be it. He’s young, he’s good-looking and all the guys he encounters either want to be him or hook up with him. But Filip’s hedonistic lifestyle grinds to a halt when his sister dies, leaving him to take care of her infant child. Filip’s never taken care of anyone before, not even himself, so he has his work cut out for him as a de facto dad with no stable income and a lifetime of making bad choices.
Can Filip be responsible? That’s the main question Proud asks, and it answers it by giving an honest portrait of an immature boy who slowly – slowly – matures into a man. It’s not an easy, straightforward path, though, and Filip realizes he has to rely on others for help. Proud consists of eight episodes at approximately 32 minutes each, and it’s just the right length to watch one of summer’s most surprising – and rewarding – dramas.
Advertisement
‘My Adventures With Superman’ Season 3 – HBO Max
Look! Up in the sky! It’s a bird! It’s a plane! It’s … an overused pun connecting a certain all-American comic book character to season 3 of an animated TV show. Yes, My Adventures with Superman is back on HBO Max with a new batch of episodes starting on June 14.
This scene brings back Supes (voiced by Jack Quaid), Lois Lane (Alice Lee) and Jimmy Olsen (Ishmel Sahid) as they hang with new friends like Superboy (Darren Criss) and battle new villains like Cyborg Superman. One of the main plots this time around is The Reign of the Supermen, an adaptation of a very famous ‘90s storyline which sees several successors to Superman’s role as Metropolis’ primary defender.
Thank You!
You have successfully subscribed.
Advertisement
‘The Listeners’ Season 1 – Starz
Claire’s (Rebecca Hall) life is pretty ordinary until she hears a distant humming noise that completely disrupts her routine. No one else close to her can hear it – not her husband, daughter or her fellow teachers – except for Kyle (Ollie West), a student in her class who is also mystified about the noise. Both wonder where it comes from and why they can only hear it, but as they investigate the source of their disturbance, their initial curiosity gives way to an all-consuming obsession.
With its slow, steady pacing and emphasis on liminal space to conjure a strange, vaguely menacing mood, The Listeners is like an A24 movie stretched across four episodes. That might dissuade people from watching it, but those who enjoyed the recent horror hit Backrooms and the 1995 Julianne Moore film Safe should like this series. As the noise-plagued protagonist, Hall once again shows she’s one of the most underrated actors working today. She’s fantastic, especially in the scenes when her character is slowly losing her grip on her sanity.
After eight long years, director Steven Spielberg is back with a new sci-fi movie, Disclosure Day. While he has proven himself to be a master at virtually every genre in existence, there’s something about a new Spielberg sci-fi film that simply can’t be replicated. The new movie finds the legendary filmmaker revisiting themes and ideas he explored decades ago, in movies such as Close Encounters of the Third Kind and E.T. the Extraterrestrial, although this one shares more in common with two of Spielberg’s underrated sci-fi films — A.I. Artificial Intelligence and Minority Report. The movie is exceeding expectations at the box office in its opening weekend, on the strength of massive audience interest and positive reviews.
The box office has been on a hot streak for the past several weeks, with hits such as Obsession, Backrooms, and the Scary Movie reboot driving business. Before that, Project Hail Mary deployed Spielbergian tactics to deliver more than $680 million at the worldwide box office. Disclosure Day received positive early reactions, and is now sitting at a “Certified Fresh” 81% score on the aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes. The site’s consensus reads, “A humanistic variation on one of Steven Spielberg’s most revisited themes, Disclosure Day‘s breathless pursuit of optimism in an age of conspiracy gets its biggest boost from career-highlight work by Emily Blunt.”
Advertisement
Advertisement
Collider Exclusive · Sci-Fi Survival Quiz Which Sci-Fi World Would You Survive? The Matrix · Mad Max · Blade Runner · Dune · Star Wars
Five universes. Five completely different ways the future went wrong — or sideways, or up in flames. Only one of them is the world your instincts were built for. Eight questions will figure out which dystopia, galaxy, or desert wasteland you’d actually make it out of alive.
💊The Matrix
🔥Mad Max
🌧️Blade Runner
Advertisement
🏜️Dune
🚀Star Wars
Advertisement
01
You sense something is deeply wrong with the world around you. What do you do? The first instinct is often the truest one.
Advertisement
02
In a world of scarcity, what resource do you guard most fiercely? What we protect reveals what we believe survival actually requires.
Advertisement
03
What kind of threat keeps you up at night? Fear is useful data — if you’re honest about what you’re actually afraid of.
Advertisement
04
How do you deal with authority you don’t trust? Every dystopia has a power structure. Your approach to it determines everything.
Advertisement
05
Which environment could you actually endure long-term? Survival isn’t just tactical — it’s physical, psychological, and very much about where you are.
Advertisement
06
Who do you want in your corner when things fall apart? The company you keep is the clearest signal of who you actually are.
Advertisement
07
Where do you draw the line — if you draw one at all? Every survivor eventually faces a moment that tests what they’re actually made of.
Advertisement
08
What would actually make survival worth it? Staying alive is one thing. Having a reason to is another.
Advertisement
Your Fate Has Been Calculated You’d Survive In…
Your answers point to the world your instincts were built for. This is the universe your temperament, your survival instincts, and your particular brand of stubbornness were made for.
Advertisement
The Resistance, Zion
The Matrix
You took the red pill a long time ago — probably before anyone offered it to you. You’re a systems thinker who can’t help but notice the seams in things.
Advertisement
You’re drawn to understanding how the system works before figuring out how to break it.
You’d find the Resistance, or it would find you — your instinct for spotting constructed realities is the machines’ worst nightmare.
You function best when you have access to information and the freedom to act on it.
The Matrix built an airtight prison. You’d be the one probing the walls for the door.
The Wasteland
Mad Max
The wasteland doesn’t reward the clever or the well-connected — it rewards those who are hard to kill and harder to break. That’s you.
Advertisement
You don’t need comfort, community, or a cause larger than the next horizon.
You need a vehicle, a clear threat, and enough fuel to outrun it — and you’re good at all three.
You are unsentimental enough to survive that world, and decent enough — just barely — to be something more than another raider.
In the wasteland, that distinction is everything.
Los Angeles, 2049
Blade Runner
You’d survive here because you know how to exist in moral grey areas without losing yourself completely.
Advertisement
You read people accurately, keep your circle small, and ask the questions others prefer not to answer.
In a city where humanity is a legal designation rather than a feeling, you hold onto something that keeps you functional.
You’re not a hero. But you’re not lost, either.
In Blade Runner’s world, that distinction is everything.
Arrakis
Dune
Arrakis is the most hostile environment in the known universe — and you are precisely the kind of person it rewards.
Advertisement
Patience, discipline, and political awareness are your core strengths — and on Arrakis, they’re survival tools.
You understand that the long game matters more than any single victory.
Others come to Dune and are consumed by it. You’d learn its logic and earn its respect.
In time, you wouldn’t just survive Arrakis — you’d begin to reshape it.
A Galaxy Far, Far Away
Star Wars
The galaxy far, far away is vast, loud, and in a constant state of violent political upheaval — and you wouldn’t have it any other way.
Advertisement
You find meaning in being part of something larger than yourself — a cause, a crew, a rebellion.
You’d gravitate toward the Rebellion, or the fringes, or whatever pocket of the galaxy still believes the Empire’s grip can be broken.
You fight — not because you have to, but because standing aside isn’t something you’re capable of.
In Star Wars, that willingness is what makes all the difference.
Advertisement
Here’s How Much ‘Disclosure Day’ Is Projected to Gross at the Box Office
Besides Blunt, the movie also features Josh O’Connor, Eve Hewson, Colman Domingo, Wyatt Russell, and Colin Firth. In his review, Collider’s Nate Richard described Disclosure Day as “a summer blockbuster made for cinephiles, with no IP attachment and no overreliance on obvious Easter eggs.” The movie grossed more than $18 million at the domestic box office on opening day, which includes revenue from Thursday previews. It’s on track to gross around $45 million in its first weekend, which would put it $10 million ahead of the opening weekend haul of J.J. Abrams‘ Spielberg homage, Super 8. The Jaws director served as a producer on Super 8, which ultimately made around $260 million worldwide against a reported budget of $50 million. Disclosure Day comes with a reported production budget of $115 million, and is projected to gross more than $70 million in its global debut. Stay tuned to Collider for more updates.
It has been more than 15 years since the release of “The Social Network,” the biographical drama centered on the creation of Facebook, and screenwriter Aaron Sorkin is back for its standalone sequel, “The Social Recoking.” Sorkin, who directed the sequel, wanted Jesse Eisenberg to reprise his role as Facebook’s co-founder, Mark Zuckerberg, but the actor refused. The role went to Jeremy Strong, who was eager to step into the role.
In an exclusive interview with Vanity Fair, Aaron Sorkin discussed his upcoming movie, “The Social Reckoning,” the follow-up to 2010’s Academy Award-winning movie, “The Social Network,” written by Sorkin and directed by David Fincher.
Initially, Sorkin said he would only do the project with Fincher as the director. However, the director was busy with other projects, which led Sorkin to take on the role. He did, however, reveal that Fincher was the first person to read the script and also offered help in any way he could.
Advertisement
Talking about the premise of the movie, Sorkin said, “‘The Social Network’ was about how Facebook was invented, and ‘The Social Recoking is what it’s become.”
Jesse Eisenberg Vehemently Refused The Zuckerberg Role
Jeffrey Mayer / JTMPhotos, Int’l. / MEGA
According to Sorkin, his first instinct was to approach Jesse Eisenberg to reprise his role as Mark Zuckerberg. “I felt like it belonged to him, and he was certainly battle-tested,” he said. Eisenberg was nominated for Best Actor at the Academy Awards, Golden Globe Awards, and BAFTA Awards for his portrayal of the Facebook founder.
In an interview in 2011, Eisenberg said while playing the role, he “developed an even greater affection” for the character. “So even if the character is acting in a way that hurts other characters, you still have to understand and ultimately sympathize with all of that behavior,” he said.
For the sequel, however, Sorkin said he tried to convince the actor for three days to come back, to no avail. “He simply did not want to be conflated with Mark Zuckerberg anymore, that he has his problems with the guy,” the director explained.
The Actor Changed His Tune About Zuckerberg
MEGA
While Sorkin didn’t reveal many details about his conversation with Eisenberg, he further added, “he doesn’t like kids coming up to him in airports with business cards that say ‘I’m CEO, b-tch’ for him to sign.”
In 2025, Eisenberg said he no longer wanted to be associated with Zuckerberg, saying that the CEO “evolved into somebody obsessed with avarice and power.”
Advertisement
He also shared that he disagreed with Zuckerberg’s political views, stating, “These people have billions upon billions of dollars, more money than any human person has ever amassed. And what are they doing with it? Oh, they’re doing it to curry favor with somebody who’s preaching hateful things.”
Aaron Sorkin Found His New Zuckerberg
I love that everyone is complaining about jeremy strong when he literally fits older mark zuckerberg better and jesse eisenberg is also in his 40s pic.twitter.com/Z5750MUWS8
Sorkin revealed that he first mentioned “The Social Reckoning” to Eisenberg at the 2025 Vanity Fair Oscar Party. At that same event, he ran into Jeremy Strong, and they got to talking. When the screenwriter mentioned that he was working on a sequel to “The Social Network,” the actor said that he would be interested in the role of Zuckerberg if Eisenberg passed on the opportunity.
Strong told Variety in 2025 that he would approach the role just like any other, “with empathy, with objectivity, with care.” He agreed to take on the project, as he was fascinated by the material and thought it was one of the greatest scripts he’s ever read.
Advertisement
When asked whether he’d reach out to Zuckerberg, Strong replied, “no comment,” adding that he did not have a social media presence.
“He showed up on his first day, and when he said ‘good morning’ to me, he was already talking like Mark,” Sorkin said about Strong.
Aaron Sorkin On The Challenges Of Writing The CEO
“The Social Reckoning” will focus on the 2021 Facebook leak by whistleblower Frances Haugen. Documents showed Facebook knew the platform had harmful societal effects, including political polarization, misinformation, and negative effects on mental health, but failed to take sufficient action as they conflicted with the business’ interests.
Advertisement
According to Sorkin, one of the challenges was writing Zuckerberg like any other character and disregarding his personal views about him. “I can’t judge Mark Zuckerberg while I’m writing it. You’ve got to write the character like they’re making their case to God why they should be allowed into heaven,” he explained.
“The Social Reckoning” hits theaters on October 9, 2026.
Postmodernism is a term that’s a little hard to define, and the word can mean different things depending on what medium you’re talking about, but postmodernist literature is what’s being stuck to here. It is indeed (and unsurprisingly) a movement that came about after modernism, with postmodernism being a bit more abstract and willing to tackle confounding things in life to an even greater extent than modernist works might’ve.
There’s also some really interesting language used throughout most great postmodernist novels, and it’s therefore not too surprising that some rank among the very best – and most important – books of the second half of the 20th century. Postmodernism, as a literary genre, really came about in the 1950s, and was probably at its peak in the subsequent two decades, with many (but not all) of the following novels, which can be considered among the best postmodern books ever written, being from that time.
Advertisement
10
‘Mason & Dixon’ (1997)
Image via Henry Holt and Company
There is probably a Thomas Pynchon book you’re expecting to see here, even if you’ve not read it, because it’s kind of infamous (one that got a shout-out in Knives Out, of all places). And it will be here, a little later. For now, though, here’s another Pynchon novel: Mason & Dixon. This one’s challenging, but not so much because of its disturbing content, as other Pynchon novels are more confronting, as well as probably more confounding when it comes to things like narrative.
The story in Mason & Dixon is almost straightforward, at least by Pynchon’s standards, being a story within a story about Charles Mason and Jeremiah Dixon, who, in the 18th century, surveyed parts of North America together and established the Mason-Dixon line. The perplexing part of Mason & Dixon is the language used, as it’s done in a way that does some combination of homaging and parodying the literature of the time in which it’s set, but once you get used to that style, it’s a compelling read. Hell, it’s compelling in a weird way even if you don’t 100% get used to that style.
Advertisement
9
‘The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time’ (2003)
Image via Doubleday
Just to show that a book doesn’t have to be grim, confusing, and aimed at an adult audience to technically be postmodern, here’s The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time. Sure, it’s not as “important” or “classic” as some of the other books mentioned here, but it could work as a great introduction to unconventional literature, for younger readers. It’s postmodernism, but with the postmodernist training wheels still on (postmodernist wheels are like, triangles, or something, and there are two and a half wheels per set, because **** you, that’s why).
The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time is about a teenage boy who observes the world in a unique way, and what happens when he becomes fixated on solving the murder of a neighbor’s dog. The first-person narration here is really what carries the whole book, and makes it stand out, as does the use of maps and other images used throughout; they help make this somewhat postmodernist, and also, they help elevate what’s an already solid mystery novel into something of a modern classic.
Advertisement
8
‘Underworld’ (1997)
Image via Scribner
The idea of the “Great American Novel” has been a thing for so long, and the search for it has been so built up, it might well never be a thing. There might well never be a definitive “Great American Novel.” That doesn’t stop there from being contenders, though, with Underworld by Don DeLillo being at least worth considering… and it was even linked to the idea of the “Great American Novel” as early as the year it was first published.
What Underworld does narratively might not sound too wild, since it’s about the baseball that was hit by Bobby Thomson in 1951: the one in the so-called Shot Heard ‘Round the World. It’s about that baseball over the years, and the different people who obtained it at some point, but after the prologue dealing with the New York Giants vs. Brooklyn Dodgers match, Underworld jumps forward to the 1990s, and then each part of the book goes back 10 or so years, until things are back in the 1950s. That structure is very postmodernist, as is DeLillo’s general style, not to mention the sprawl and different tangents of Underworld. It’s huge, strange, overwhelming, and almost always very impressive, as a novel.
Advertisement
7
‘Lolita’ (1955)
Image via Olympia Press
You probably know what Lolita is about, and it is, but it’s also very different, in practice, than how some people like to describe it. On one hand, Lolita is easier to read than you might expect a book with such subject matter to have, as it is equal parts witty and poetic. But then it is somehow darker and more uncomfortable than you might be prepared for, and you’re already going to be prepared for something dark and uncomfortable.
It might be the fact that Lolita is funny and horrifying without it feeling like two different books clashing that makes it such a harrowing read. You’re always yanked around, and you feel like you’re being tormented, toyed with, and sometimes controlled by the book’s narrator… a man who infamously exerts control over the young girl he calls Lolita, all while attempting to manipulate other characters alongside those he’s telling his story to, too. The effect is dizzying, impressive, and hard to read, but persevering through this particular book is ultimately worth it.
Advertisement
6
‘The Unbearable Lightness of Being’ (1984)
Image via Harper Perennial
Of course The Unbearable Lightness of Being is postmodernist, with a title like “The Unbearable Lightness of Being” and all. This is a book about a womanizer and the two women who have had the biggest impact on him, though he does have many more women in his life, and he’s far from a likable protagonist (it doesn’t feel like he’s supposed to be, either, but this still might be a turnoff for some readers).
Well, actually, that synopsis applies to the movie adaptation of The Unbearable Lightness of Being. The book is also somewhat about those things, but is a lot more poetic and kind of dreamlike, de-emphasizing what narrative there is here while often being more concerned with philosophical ideas and other musings on life and love (or a lack thereof) more generally. It’s better – and more readable – than all that might make it sound, promise.
Advertisement
5
‘Slaughterhouse-Five’ (1969)
Image via Dell Publishing
Slaughterhouse-Five tackles so many genres at once, which is impressive, considering it’s not a long book, by any means. The first edition came in at under 200 pages, but in that time, Slaughterhouse-Five is about World War II, time travel, and trauma, being a satirical book, a work of science fiction, and a war novel (plus some other things, probably) all at once.
It’s the novel for which Kurt Vonnegut is best known, and it’s also up there among the greatest books of the 20th century, however you might be willing to define it; whatever category it gets slotted into. While The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time might be more approachable, Slaughterhouse-Five is also a good novel to read if you want a (relatively) gentle introduction to postmodern literature, mostly just because it’s quite punchy and a good deal shorter than some of the other books mentioned here. Speaking of longer books being mentioned here…
Advertisement
4
‘Infinite Jest’ (1996)
Image via Little, Brown and Company
…Infinite Jest. Hoo boy. This could be the final boss of postmodernist literature, in the sense that it’s unlikely anyone will write something simultaneously as long, unwaveringly ambitious/strange, postmodernist, and genuinely good in the foreseeable future. For starters, there are so many footnotes throughout Infinite Jest that if you exclusively read those footnotes, it still might take quite a bit longer than some full-length novels (based on the uncut audiobook of Infinite Jest being eight hours longer than the audiobook that only features the main novel, with the footnotes not being read).
And you might think that’s well and good and all, “But what is Infinite Jest actually about?,” you might be asking. Whatever you want it to be; whatever you end up thinking it’s about is what it’s about. It is as postmodernist as things get, while still being actually readable and often surprisingly entertaining. It’s a classic that feels like it has to be read, and yet it also feels very hard to actually recommend. Jest, so confusing.
Advertisement
3
‘Gravity’s Rainbow’ (1973)
Image via Viking Press
One of the things that gets brought up quite often, when talking about Gravity’s Rainbow, is how it broke the Pulitzer Prize jury the year it came out. Now, it’s not the only time there was some kind of dispute, and the Pulitzer Prize for Fiction was not given out for a certain year, but it’s still interesting. Sorry if it’s something you already knew, but hey, it is a good way to summarize and succinctly explain the notion of Gravity’s Rainbow being challenging and very much not for everyone.
It’s a wild novel that manages to be incredibly long (more than 750 pages, and closer to 900, sometimes, depending on an edition’s formatting) and also remarkably dense, with plenty of sentences you’ll feel tempted to read again and again to make sense of them. If sense is even something that can be made here. And then there’s the matter of trying all those sentences, pages, and wildly different episodes together. It is postmodernism squared, and then some, but very much worth tackling whenever you find yourself with quite a bit of free time on your hands.
Advertisement
2
‘House of Leaves’ (2000)
Image via Pantheon
The style of House of Leaves is often the story, even more than a book where a distinctive style is used to tell the story. House of Leaves tackles psychological horror in a unique way, and in a manner that could only really be done as a book. If you want a movie that scratches the same itch as some of House of Leaves, there is always Backrooms, and also a rather famous mod for Doom II called MyHouse.wad is almost like a video game adaptation of parts of House of Leaves.
But even with these, it’s mostly just parts of the novel that are represented in these works from different mediums. There are different sorts of horror in House of Leaves, long tangents, supplemental material that helps the overall book (even if such parts aren’t always 100% necessary to read in their entirety), and countless smaller stories told through footnotes. You’ve also got the wild formatting that has to be seen to be believed, and it’s bonkers enough in that department that you probably couldn’t even do an audiobook version of House of Leaves, let alone make it into some kind of movie.
Advertisement
1
‘Libra’ (1985)
Image via Viking Press
It was hard limiting this whole ranking to only featuring two Don DeLillo novels, a little like how it was also hard including “only” two Thomas Pynchon ones. They’re not necessarily the grandfathers of postmodernism, but they’ve both been active for decades, and they’re also living legends in the sense that both have had works published in the 2020s (even if those books haven’t quite been as great as either author’s best works).
With DeLillo, White Noise deserves an honorable mention, but it’s Libra that’s his greatest novel overall. Even if it’s not as aggressively postmodern as Underworld, nor as sprawling, it is DeLillo’s most compelling novel, alongside being the hardest to stop thinking about, once you’ve read it. It’s the best story concerning the John F. Kennedy assassination (and there have been quite a few), and also one of the most paranoia-inducing novels of, potentially, all time. Sorry if that sounds a bit hyperbolic, but it really is something (very) special.
David Beckham was awarded a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame, the first soccer player to receive the honor. He was surrounded by family and close friends, including his wife Victoria, and three of his four children. Notably absent was his firstborn, Brooklyn Beckham, amid reports of a rift within the family.
Brooklyn cut off all contact with the Beckhams several months ago, but not before releasing a lengthy statement accusing his parents of controlling his life. David and Victoria have since attempted to reconcile with their son to no avail.
James Whatling / MEGA
On June 12, David Beckham received the 2,849th star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame under the Sports Entertainment category. It was a momentous occasion for David, who joined other athletes honored by the Hollywood Chamber of Commerce in the past, including Shaquille O’Neal, Billie Jean King, Muhammad Ali, and Magic Johnson. David, however, was the first soccer player to receive a star.
Speaking during the ceremony, David said the moment felt “surreal.” “I’ve always been a dreamer, but I could never have imagined that an honor like this would come to a working class English soccer player like me,” he said.
David is widely regarded as one of the most iconic soccer players of his generation, playing for top clubs such as Manchester United and Real Madrid. He retired from the sport in 2013 and is the co-owner of the U.S. Major League Soccer team Inter Miami CF.
Advertisement
Brooklyn Beckham Skipped The Ceremony
ZUMAPRESS.com / MEGA
Tom Cruise was in attendance to honor David, and in his speech said, “His is a Hollywood story: a boy who believed in something bigger than himself, had to work for every opportunity he received, and went on to influence his sport, shape culture around the world, and create opportunities for generations who followed.”
Other celebrities present included Eva Longoria and James Corden. David’s family, including his wife Victoria and children Cruz, Romeo, and Harper, were also there to support him. Brooklyn, however, was nowhere in sight.
In January, the eldest Beckham child posted a lengthy note on Instagram Stories, accusing his parents of being controlling and undermining his relationship with his wife, Nicola Peltz, as The Blast previously reported. Before ending his message, he wrote, “I do not want to reconcile with my family.”
Harper Beckham Was Seen Outside Her Brother’s Home
Harper Beckham, 14, sends love to 3 brothers as family drama with Brooklyn rages on The teen’s sweet post could be seen as an olive branch to her eldest brother as his rift with the Beckham family continues. pic.twitter.com/wfdOOVeOIO
According to Page Six, Harper was seen arriving in an SUV outside Brooklyn’s L.A. home shortly after David’s Hollywood Walk of Fame ceremony concluded. She was wearing the same pink dress she wore at the event.
Advertisement
An insider, however, said that Brooklyn and Nicola were out of town, and Harper left shortly thereafter. The youngest Beckham sibling’s visit may have been another attempt at reaching out to her brother.
In February, Harper also mentioned Brooklyn in a Valentine’s Day post honoring her three brothers. She posted a black-and-white photo of her younger self alongside Brooklyn, Romeo, and Cruz, adding the text, “I love you all so much, words can’t describe it,” and tagging all three.
David Beckham Refuses To Talk Publicly About Rift
Phil Loftus/Capital Pictures / MEGA
In an interview with Variety, David talked about his Hollywood star, his career, soccer, and his relationship with Victoria. When asked how they keep their relationship solid despite being constantly scrutinized by tabloids, the former athlete said that although they have busy schedules, their relationship and their family always come first.
“That’s our priority, and that’s what makes it work when you’ve been together for so long. Our priority will always be our family,” David explained.
When the topic went to the reported rift in the family, David was quick to say that he didn’t want to address it. “I’m sorry to stop you there, but that’s a private matter. That’s one thing that I don’t want to talk about,” David said.
Advertisement
David And Victoria Beckham Have Repeatedly Reached Out To Brooklyn
ZUMAPRESS.com / MEGA
According to reports, Brooklyn blocked his parents on social media in December 2025 and stated that any future communication should be conducted only through his lawyers. He also asked them to stop tagging him on social media posts.
In March, on Brooklyn’s 27th birthday, both David and Victoria took to social media to share birthday greetings for their son. The husband and wife posted on their respective Instagram Stories, sharing photos of themselves during happier times with Brooklyn and greeting him a happy birthday. “I love you so much,” Victoria wrote.
In an interview with WSJ in April, Victoria touched on the topic, but didn’t go into specifics. “We’ve been in the public eye for more than 30 years right now, and all we’ve ever tried to do is protect our children and love our children. And you know, that’s all I really want to say about it,” she said.
For a long time, I thought vampire movies had a serious repetition problem. Somebody gets bitten, somebody spends half the film staring sadly out a window, almost everytime somebody (a vampire) falls in love with the wrong person (a human), and eventually somebody ends up dead. After a while, a lot of them started blending together in my memory.
The films on this list broke that pattern. These ten films represent some of the most visually striking, ambitious, and unforgettable examples the genre has ever produced, which is exactly why they still feel so alive decades after many of their contemporaries disappeared.
Advertisement
10
‘Only Lovers Left Alive’ (2013)
Only Lovers Left Alive, Adam and Eve, tom hiddleston and Tilda SwintonImage via Recorded Picture Company
Adam (Tom Hiddleston) and Eve (Tilda Swinton) have been together for centuries, and by the time the film begins, they are already exhausted by most of modern life. Adam spends his nights recording music in Detroit and avoiding people whenever possible, while Eve arrives from Tangier carrying books, stories, and enough curiosity to make the world seem interesting again. Their relationship is unusually quiet for a vampire film. They are not chasing victims or fighting enemies. Most of the time they are simply talking, listening to music, driving through empty streets, and trying to find meaning in another century of existence.
What stays with me is how much attention the film gives to small things. Adam can spend several minutes discussing a scientist he admires, and Eve can become excited over a stack of old books. Even the cities matter because Detroit and Tangier feel worn down and beautiful in completely different ways. The vampire story almost becomes secondary to two immortal people trying to hold onto the things they still love.
Advertisement
9
‘Near Dark’ (1987)
Lance Henriksen, Jenette Goldstein, and Bill Paxton in Near Dark.Image via De Laurentiis Entertainment Group
Everything changes for Caleb Colton (Adrian Pasdar) after one night with Mae (Jenny Wright), a drifter who bites him before disappearing into the darkness. By sunrise, Caleb can no longer stand daylight, and he is forced into a nomadic vampire group that travels across the American Southwest. The gang includes Jesse Hooker (Lance Henriksen), Diamondback (Jenette Goldstein), and Severen (Bill Paxton), whose idea of passing time usually involves violence, intimidation, and leaving bodies behind.
A lot of vampire films surround their creatures with castles, ancient legends, or aristocratic manners. Near Dark drops them into motels, highways, and roadside bars instead. One of the most memorable scenes takes place inside a crowded bar where Severen spends the evening terrorizing strangers simply because he enjoys it. Caleb never fully fits into that lifestyle, which gives the story its tension. While the rest of the group accepts endless killing as normal, he keeps looking for a way back to the life he had before Mae found him.
Advertisement
8
‘Bram Stoker’s Dracula’ (1992)
Keanu Reeves in a still from Bram Stoker’s Dracula.Image via Columbia Pictures
Jonathan Harker (Keanu Reeves) travels to Transylvania expecting a routine legal assignment and quickly realizes Count Dracula (Gary Oldman) is nothing like the wealthy client he imagined. The castle feels isolated from the rest of the world, strange things happen at night, and Dracula becomes increasingly interested in Mina Murray (Winona Ryder) after seeing her photograph. Long before the story reaches London, the film already feels dreamlike, as though reality itself is starting to bend around the Count.
Much of the film revolves around Dracula’s obsession with Mina and his belief that she is connected to a love he lost centuries earlier. That idea gives the story a sadness that many vampire films never attempt. At the same time, Francis Ford Coppola fills almost every scene with elaborate costumes, shadows, candles, and practical effects that look handmade. Even people who dislike parts of the adaptation often remember individual images years later because there is so much visual imagination packed into nearly every sequence.
Advertisement
7
‘A Girl Walks Home Alone at Night’ (2014)
Image via Vice Films
Bad City looks like a place people forgot to leave. Oil pumps move endlessly in the distance, streets stay empty for long stretches, and most of the people still living there seem lonely in one way or another. Among them is Arash (Arash Marandi), a young man struggling with his father’s debts and increasingly difficult life. Somewhere else in the city, a vampire known simply as The Girl (Sheila Vand) spends her nights wandering the streets in a black chador, watching the people around her.
The Girl is not interested in random victims. Drug dealers, abusers, and men who prey on others often attract her attention first. One scene involving a skateboard and an empty street somehow becomes as memorable as the horror moments because the film spends so much time creating a mood unlike anything else in the genre. It moves at its own pace and trusts silence far more than dialogue.
Advertisement
6
‘Cronos’ (1993)
Image via October Films
Everything begins when Jesús Gris (Federico Luppi), an elderly antiques dealer, discovers a strange mechanical device hidden inside a statue. The object, known as the Cronos device, was created centuries earlier by an alchemist searching for eternal life. When Jesús accidentally activates it, a metal needle pierces his skin and starts changing him in ways he does not immediately understand. His health improves, his energy returns, and he begins craving things that once meant nothing to him.
The film becomes increasingly sad because Jesús is not somebody chasing immortality. He already has a family, a granddaughter who adores him, and a quiet life he seems perfectly happy with. Dieter de la Guardia (Claudio Brook) desperately wants the device for himself, while his nephew Angel (Ron Perlman) spends much of the story carrying out his orders with growing frustration. As Jesús changes, the film keeps returning to his relationship with his granddaughter Aurora (Tamara Shanath), and those scenes give the story far more emotional weight than a traditional monster movie.
Advertisement
5
‘Martin’ (1977)
Image via Libra Films
Martin (John Amplas) arrives in a small Pennsylvania town to live with his elderly cousin Cuda (Lincoln Maazel), who is convinced the young man is a vampire. Martin insists that he is completely ordinary, though his behavior makes that difficult to believe. He stalks women, breaks into homes, and uses syringes to sedate his victims before drinking their blood. Unlike most vampire films, there are no fangs, supernatural powers, or ancient curses here. Everything Martin does could be explained through reality.
That uncertainty hangs over the entire film. Martin tells stories about another life that may or may not have happened, while Cuda treats him as a genuine monster sent from centuries ago. George A. Romero never rushes to answer who Martin really is. Instead, the film becomes a portrait of loneliness, obsession, and a young man who seems completely disconnected from the people around him. Even decades later, very few vampire movies feel this unsettling or this difficult to categorize.
Advertisement
4
‘Let the Right One In’ (2008)
A bloodied young girl with brown hair looking at something concernedImage via Sandrew Metronome
Oskar (Kåre Hedebrant) spends most of his time alone. He is bullied at school, struggles to connect with other children, and often retreats into his own imagination. Then Eli (Lina Leandersson) moves into the apartment next door. She only appears outside at night, rarely seems bothered by the freezing weather, and immediately feels different from everybody else around her. Their friendship develops slowly through conversations, small moments of trust, and shared loneliness.
At the same time, a series of killings begins attracting attention throughout the area. Eli’s connection to those murders becomes increasingly difficult to ignore, though the film never treats her as a simple villain. She remains a child in many ways, despite carrying burdens that nobody her age should understand. The swimming pool sequence near the end has become famous for good reason because it says almost everything about their relationship without showing very much directly. The film is violent when it needs to be, though most of its power comes from watching two isolated children find comfort in each other.
Advertisement
3
‘Shadow of the Vampire’ (2000)
Image via Lions Gate Films
During the production of Nosferatu in 1922, director F.W. Murnau (John Malkovich) becomes obsessed with creating the most realistic vampire film ever made. His solution is simple and completely insane: he hires a real vampire to play Count Orlok. Max Schreck (Willem Dafoe) joins the production, and at first the cast assumes he is merely an eccentric method actor. Before long, however, strange disappearances and unsettling behavior begin making that explanation harder to accept.
One of the film’s greatest strengths is how seriously everyone treats the filmmaking process. Murnau remains so focused on finishing his movie that he keeps ignoring increasingly obvious danger around him. Meanwhile, Schreck often seems more interested in understanding ordinary human behavior than hiding what he is. Watching Dafoe move through scenes with equal parts curiosity, hunger, and confusion becomes one of the film’s biggest pleasures. Instead of telling a vampire story directly, the film turns the making of a vampire movie into the horror story itself.
Advertisement
2
‘Nosferatu the Vampyre’ (1979)
Klaus Kinski and Bruno Ganz in Nosferatu the VampyreImage via 20th Century Fox
When Jonathan Harker (Bruno Ganz) travels to meet Count Dracula (Klaus Kinski), the journey already feels wrong long before they meet. Villagers warn him not to continue, the landscape grows increasingly empty, and Dracula’s castle appears almost abandoned by the rest of the world. Kinski plays Dracula as a deeply lonely figure rather than a powerful seducer. From his first scenes onward, he seems trapped inside centuries of isolation.
The relationship between Dracula and Lucy Harker (Isabelle Adjani) gradually becomes the center of the story. Dracula’s attraction to her carries genuine sadness because he understands that immortality has left him completely cut off from normal human life. Werner Herzog spends a great deal of time on images that have little to do with plot and everything to do with atmosphere. Empty streets, silent rooms, and entire towns overtaken by plague give the film a strange feeling that never leaves. It is a vampire story, though it often feels closer to a meditation on loneliness and decay.
Advertisement
1
‘Nosferatu’ (1922)
Max Schreck stands aboard a ship looking menacing in 1922’s NosferatuImage via Film Arts Guild
More than a century later, Nosferatu still contains images that instantly come to mind when people think about vampires. Count Orlok (Max Schreck) emerging from the darkness, standing rigid in a doorway, or moving through empty spaces remains unsettling because the character looks unlike almost every vampire that followed. He does not charm people, blend into society, or hide behind elegance. He looks sickly, animalistic, and genuinely disturbing.
The story itself follows Thomas Hutter (Gustav von Wangenheim) as he travels to Orlok’s castle and unknowingly helps bring the creature back to his hometown. Once Orlok arrives, disease begins spreading through the city, and fear quickly follows. Many modern vampire films focus heavily on romance, action, or mythology. Nosferatu strips things down to something much simpler and more primal. It is built around dread. Even with silent-film limitations, shadows, movement, and composition do so much work that many scenes remain more memorable than sequences from horror films made a hundred years later.
Advertisement
Collider Exclusive · Horror Survival Quiz Which Horror Villain Do You Have the Best Chance of Surviving? Jason Voorhees · Michael Myers · Freddy Krueger · Pennywise · Chucky
Advertisement
Five killers. Five completely different ways to die — if you’re not smart enough, fast enough, or self-aware enough to avoid it. Only one of them is the villain your particular set of instincts gives you a fighting chance against. Eight questions will figure out which one.
🏕️Jason
🔪Michael
💤Freddy
🎈Pennywise
Advertisement
🪆Chucky
Advertisement
01
Something feels wrong. You can’t explain it — you just know. What do you do? First instincts are the difference between the survivor and the first act casualty.
Advertisement
02
Where are you most likely to find yourself when things go wrong? Setting is everything in horror. Where you are determines which rules apply.
Advertisement
03
What is your most reliable survival asset? Every survivor has a quality the villain didn’t account for. What’s yours?
Advertisement
04
What kind of fear is hardest for you to fight through? Knowing your weakness is the first step to not dying because of it.
Advertisement
05
You’re with a group when things start going wrong. What’s your role? Horror movies are brutally clear about who survives group situations and who doesn’t.
Advertisement
06
What’s the horror movie mistake you’re most likely to make? Honest self-assessment is a survival skill. Denial is not.
Advertisement
07
What’s your best weapon against something that can’t be stopped by conventional means? Every horror villain has a weakness. The survivors are always the ones who find it.
Advertisement
08
It’s the final scene. You’re the last one standing. How did you make it? The final survivor always has a reason. What’s yours?
Advertisement
Your Survival Odds Have Been Calculated Your Best Chance Is Against…
Your instincts, your strengths, and your particular way of thinking under pressure point to one villain you actually have a fighting chance against. Everyone else — good luck.
Advertisement
Camp Crystal Lake · Friday the 13th
Jason Voorhees
Jason is relentless, but he is also predictable — and that is the gap you would exploit.
He moves in straight lines toward his target. He doesn’t strategise, doesn’t adapt, doesn’t outsmart. He simply pursues.
Your ability to keep moving, use the environment, and resist the panic that freezes most victims gives you a genuine edge.
The Crystal Lake survivors were always the ones who stopped running in circles and started thinking about terrain, water, and distance.
You think like that. Which means Jason, for all his indestructibility, would face someone who simply refused to be where he expected.
Advertisement
Haddonfield, Illinois · Halloween
Michael Myers
Michael watches before he moves. He is patient, methodical, and almost impossible to detect — until it’s too late for anyone who isn’t paying close enough attention.
But you are paying attention. You notice the shape in the window, the car parked slightly wrong, the silence where there should be sound.
Michael’s power lies in the invisibility of ordinary suburbia — the fact that nothing ever looks wrong until it already is.
Your spatial awareness and instinct to map every room, every exit, and every shadow before you need them is precisely the quality Laurie Strode had.
You are not a victim waiting to happen. You are someone who already suspects something is wrong — and acts on it.
Advertisement
Elm Street · A Nightmare on Elm Street
Freddy Krueger
Freddy wins by getting inside your head — using your own fears, your own memories, your own subconscious as weapons against you. That strategy requires a target who can be destabilised.
You are harder to destabilise than most. You’ve faced uncomfortable truths about yourself and you haven’t looked away.
The survivors on Elm Street were always the ones who understood what was happening and chose to face it rather than flee from it.
Freddy’s greatest weakness is that his power evaporates in the presence of someone who refuses to give him the fear he feeds on.
Your psychological resilience — the ability to stay grounded when reality itself becomes unreliable — is exactly the quality that keeps you alive here.
Advertisement
Derry, Maine · It
Pennywise
Pennywise is ancient, shapeshifting, and feeds on terror — but it has one critical vulnerability: it cannot function against someone who genuinely stops being afraid of it.
The Losers Club didn’t survive because they were braver than everyone else. They survived because they faced their fears together, and faced them honestly.
You ask the questions others avoid. You look directly at what frightens you rather than turning away.
That directness — the refusal to let fear fester in the dark — is Pennywise’s worst nightmare.
It chose the wrong target when it chose you. You are exactly the kind of person whose fear tastes like nothing at all.
Advertisement
Chicago · Child’s Play
Chucky
Chucky’s greatest advantage is that nobody takes him seriously until it’s already too late. He exploits the gap between how something looks and what it actually is.
You don’t have that gap. You take threats seriously regardless of how they present — and you never make the mistake of underestimating something because of its size or appearance.
Chucky relies on surprise, on the delay between recognition and response. You close that delay faster than almost anyone.
Your instinct to treat every unfamiliar thing with appropriate scepticism — rather than dismissing it because it seems absurd — is the exact quality that keeps you breathing.
Against Chucky, not laughing is already winning. You are very good at not laughing.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login