Gartner has warned that the EU’s plans to triple datacenter capacity in Europe over the next five to seven years will add complexity for public sector tech buyers.

The sweeping plans, which encompass sovereign cloud, AI, microprocessors, and open source, will have ramifications for EU tech supply chains and beyond if they get through the legislative process.

In the European Technological Sovereignty Package launched last week, the European Commission sought to strengthen its digital autonomy.

Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said: “We cannot afford to depend on others for the technologies that keep our hospitals running, our energy grids stable, and our services secure. This is about protecting our citizens, defending our interests, and making our own choices.”

The backdrop to the EU’s action is widespread concern about European providers only offering around 15 percent of cloud infrastructure in the region, with the dominant American providers subject to US jurisdiction.

The risks were spelled out when US sanctions on International Criminal Court (ICC) prosecutor Karim Khan led to his Microsoft services being suspended. Microsoft denied responsibility, saying it was the ICC’s decision. The Dutch press later reported that the decision was made under duress after Microsoft pointed out that its obligations under the sanctions meant it would have to cut off service to the entire organization unless the ICC removed Khan’s access.

European concerns over reliance on hyperscalers also stem from the US CLOUD Act of 2018, which allows American authorities to compel US-based tech companies to provide requested data, regardless of where that data is stored globally. In June 2025, Microsoft admitted under oath in a French court that it couldn’t guarantee digital sovereignty if American authorities demanded access to data held on Microsoft servers on foreign soil.

The EU’s plan – a set of laws and policies – “creates a transparent, non-discriminatory blueprint for digital autonomy that allows the EU to build resilient, sovereign tech infrastructures at home while providing a trusted, legally sound model for international partnerships and multilateral governance abroad.”

However, public sector CIOs across Europe are likely to find the Technological Sovereignty Package a challenge to implement.

The EU proposes bringing the nebulous concept of “digital sovereignty” to life with an auditable, four-level control system. Union Assurance Levels (UALs), as the political and economic bloc calls it, will be based on where the user organization sits across cumulative measures of control, jurisdiction, data processing, supply chain, and security.

“The introduction of UALs will likely cause confusion for providers and buyers, as it adds to an already crowded landscape of existing cloud sovereignty criteria,” according to Gartner.

UALs are set to become legally enforceable under the Cloud and AI Development Act (CADA), and for public sector tech leaders they will add to an alphabet soup of existing rules and recommendations.

These include the European Cybersecurity Certification Framework’s Sovereignty Effectiveness Assurance Levels (SEAL), a non-binding framework for scoring and selection; the German Federal Office for Information Security’s (BSI) Cloud Computing Autonomy (C3A) policy, also currently non-binding; and France’s SecNumCloud, an ANSSI binding certification scheme for government procurement.

The new rules mean government CIOs should think about their cloud-based data workloads, digital infrastructure, and core applications not in terms of physical territories, but as defined by legal jurisdiction, Gartner recommends.

EU boost for open source

Another big chunk of the EU’s escape plan is based on promoting open source software. The new Open Source Strategy aims to scale up open source alternatives in cloud, AI, internet technologies, cybersecurity, and semiconductors. The EU plans to invest in skills, support open source startups, and improve the long-term maintenance and security of Europe’s open source digital infrastructure.

The strategy also introduces procurement guidelines and best practices to support greater use of open source alternatives to proprietary software in the public sector stack.

In a separate paper, Gartner says the EU’s approach to open source IT services is a fundamental shift. No longer is open source only about cost and innovation. For the EU, it becomes “a mechanism to ensure transparency, auditability, and independence from external control, increasingly supported by EU-led efforts to fund and sustain critical open source components, including their long-term maintenance and security.”

As a result, the market needs to respond. “Rather than being selectively adopted, open source components will increasingly underpin core platform layers, particularly in sovereign environments,” Gartner said. “This requires a move toward industrialized open source capabilities, including governance, security, long-term support, and integration into enterprise-grade delivery models, in line with emerging EU initiatives to ensure their sustained funding and resilience.”

The last lever the EU wants to pull to rid itself of US-dominated tech comes in the form of a revamped Chips Act, first created to strengthen Europe’s research and innovation capacity in semiconductors. It is not to be confused with the US CHIPS and Science Act, which in 2022 allocated a $52.7 billion federal package to boost the American semiconductor industry and reduce reliance on East Asian vendors.

The Chips Act 2.0 includes measures to end Europe’s reliance on the rest of the world for advanced chips – below 10 nanometers – by prioritizing facilities in the EU. It promises to cut red tape and simplify state aid applications for building chip factories, thereby accelerating development. The EU also plans to join up support between R&D and manufacturing.

Taken together, the Technological Sovereignty Package is the EU’s first concrete attempt to implement outwardly focused regulations governing public sector technology procurement, Gartner said.

“By leveraging common definitions of digital sovereignty, future public sector procurement will shift from purely open competition toward a ‘European preference’ model for highly secure workloads.

“The legislation’s focus on chips, datacenters, cloud, AI, and open source establishes a comprehensive ‘stacks’ view of digital sovereignty as formal EU policy. This shift will trigger a second wave of governments to heavily prioritize European digital sovereignty, following early leaders like France, Germany, and the Netherlands.”

Before they are adopted and come into force, the proposals will have to be negotiated by the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. In the process, they are bound to provoke the US tech industry, and likely the Trump administration.

However, the EU has mostly stood by plans for various legislation under the Digital Services Act and Digital Markets Act, meting out rulings and fines. Provided it does the same with the new sovereignty package, suppliers will have to respond to a complete reshaping of tech buying across Europe’s public sector.

How this stimulates the supply market might change the calculus for all tech buyers throughout Europe and beyond. ®

Looking for the most recent Wordle answer? Click here for today’s Wordle hints, as well as our daily answers and hints for The New York Times Mini Crossword, Connections, Connections: Sports Edition and Strands puzzles.

Today’s Wordle puzzle is a fun but unusual word, with plenty of vowels. If you need a new starter word, check out our list of which letters show up the most in English words. If you need hints and the answer, read on.

Read more: New Study Reveals Wordle’s Top 10 Toughest Words of 2025

Today’s Wordle hints

Before we show you today’s Wordle answer, we’ll give you some hints. If you don’t want a spoiler, look away now.

Wordle hint No. 1: Repeats

Today’s Wordle answer has no repeated letters.

Wordle hint No. 2: Vowels

Today’s Wordle answer has three vowels.

Wordle hint No. 3: First letter

Today’s Wordle answer begins with S.

Wordle hint No. 4: Last letter

Today’s Wordle answer ends with A.

Wordle hint No. 5: Meaning

Today’s Wordle answer can refer to a deep, warm, reddish-brown color.

TODAY’S WORDLE ANSWER

Today’s Wordle answer is SEPIA.

Yesterday’s Wordle answer

Yesterday’s Wordle answer, June 13, No. 1820, was QUELL.

Recent Wordle answers

June 9, No. 1816: WHARF

June 10, No. 1817: ALIGN

June 11, No. 1818: TESTY

June 12, No. 1819: BREAK

What’s the best Wordle starting word?

Don’t be afraid to use our tip sheet ranking all the letters in the alphabet by frequency of uses. In short, you want starter words that lean heavy on E, A and R, and don’t contain Z, J and Q. 

Some solid starter words to try:

ADIEU

TRAIN

CLOSE

STARE

NOISE

Remote control aviation often centers on small drones that anyone can pick up and fly in a park. Levi Wagner of Team Sky Aces RC took a completely different path. He built a machine that sits in another category entirely. His remote-controlled F-14 Tomcat fighter jet measures 3.7 meters (12 feet) long. Empty it weighs 48 kilograms (106 pounds), but load it with 12 liters of jet fuel plus smoke oil and the weight rises sharply.

The airframe began as a single massive composite shell built by a specialized manufacturer. Wagner spent several years, approximately two years, completing all of the small details that make a massive model into something that genuinely looks the part. Then he painted in layers, hoping to get a precise effect with the Compass Ghost Grey colors. He brought it to life with rivets, panel lines, oil stains, and even some grime. The weathering mimicked the appearance of a real-life F-14 Tomcat that flew demo missions before retiring in 2004. Moving pilot figures sit in the cockpit, scale landing gear neatly retracts into the wells, and a smoke system generates vapor when necessary.

Sale

DJI Neo, Mini Drone with 4K UHD Camera for Adults, 135g Self Flying Drone that Follows You, Palm Takeoff…

• Due to platform compatibility issue, the DJI Fly app has been removed from Google Play. DJI Neo must be activated in the DJI Fly App, to ensure a…
• Lightweight and Regulation Friendly – At just 135g, this drone with camera for adults 4K may be even lighter than your phone and does not require FAA…
• Palm Takeoff & Landing, Go Controller-Free [1] – Neo takes off from your hand with just a push of a button. The safe and easy operation of this drone…

This F-14’s standout feature is its variable-sweep wing configuration, which is roughly identical to that of its real-life counterpart. The big difference is what this means for low-speed handling and high-speed performance. Wagner’s model has wings that slide back when flying fast and forward when slowing down or landing. Far from being just cosmetic, pilots describe the jet’s experience as having two completely different planes depending on where the wings are placed. The flaps function perfectly while the wings are in the forward position, however they cannot be used when the wings are in the back position because the airflow would damage them.

Real jet turbines generate power by burning jet fuel. This simply means that throttle response has the same lag as full-size turbine engines. It’ll do around 350 km/h, thanks in part to those big intakes, though they can add a bit of drag depending on how the jet is flown. Landings are on the fast side for RC, and the aircraft’s weight means it carries a lot of energy right through the approach.

Wagner flew the aircraft on full display at the Warbirds Over Scone airshow in Australia. The routine included a long takeoff roll, mid-air wing sweeps, high-speed runs, and a precision landing. The entire thing was uncannily similar to real-life footage of actual Tomcats, from the sound to the overall mass, the way the wings moved, and the way the aircraft simply settled in on final.

Modern games are quite often limited by the amount of volatile memory available to the GPU. Games can require many gigabytes of data during the rasterization process. So the obvious solution for better performance would be to buy a faster GPU, right? Well, not for [AssassinWarlord], who decided to find just what happens when you double the VRAM on an RTX 3070. The forum post is in German, but a translator gets the job done rather nicely.

For those of you following along at home, you will need a set of eight Samsung K4ZAF325BM-HC16 GDDR6 memory modules. In this case, the memory modules were salvaged from an AMD RX6900XT with a defective core. Naturally, you will need to re-ball the chips. To help the process, [AssassinWarlord] bought a stencil from AliExpress, with a 3D-printed holder for the memory modules.

It was a bit of a headache getting the card to actually reach the higher power states that the increased memory allows. Changing the “shunt” resistors allows the card to increase its power draw, but this proved ineffective. Some tuning and memory speed mapping at last proved successful in running the card stably.

But what happens when you benchmark the card? Well, not much. Most synthetic loads are compute-bound, not memory-bound. Therefore, overclocking the GPU would yield a greater performance increase than merely changing the memory modules. However, in some game titles, there is a marked performance benefit by nature of relying less on the glacially slow system memory. Is the performance difference worth the time and effort? No, probably not. The games that see an uptick in performance are few and far between (for now), so it’s not exactly a good effort-to-performance ratio.

If you are looking to follow along at home, make sure to check out this memory transplant next! 

Thanks, [f!P[z]y] for the tip!

Xbox is more negatively affected by the ongoing component crisis due to choices made by the company, Asha Sharma said.

Microsoft’s Xbox is reportedly planning “significant” layoffs next month as new CEO Asha Sharma attempts to tackle the gaming division’s declining financial standing.

Bloomberg reported that the scale of the layoffs – expected to be announced shortly after the close of Microsoft’s fiscal year on 30 June – is not known. Xbox is also expected to make major cuts to budget for marketing and other areas, sources told the publication.

Yesterday’s (10 June) report shortly followed a memo Sharma and Xbox’s chief content officer Matt Booty sent to employees titled “Xbox Reset”, which outlines some of the division’s spending-related issues.

Over the past five years, Microsoft poured more than $20bn into gaming content, platform and hardware subsidies, Sharma said, but saw revenue declining by nearly $500m during that time.

“We are in a hardware component crisis,” Sharma said. “When I joined as CEO in February, the price we paid for console storage components was over [twice] as high as we paid last fall. These costs have since doubled again.” Sharma expects a further hike in hardware and memory prices.

“While the entire industry is facing a components crisis, we believe we have been impacted more greatly than many of our peers due to the choices we made over the last half decade.”

Sharma pointed to declining profit margins and said that Xbox is unable to produce enough consoles for consumers to purchase.

“For some of you, these realities will be surprising and even frustrating to discover,” she said, hinting at possible layoffs at the division.

Sharma has publicly spoken about Xbox’s organisational challenges since her appointment as head in February. At the recent Bloomberg tech conference, she said that she planned on “resetting the business”, which was “not in a healthy spot.”

“We are the fortunate stewards of industry-defining franchises that have enormous potential and player demand, but we have not adequately funded them to compete and win,” Sharma wrote in the memo.

Xbox has seen its revenue decline in four of the last six quarters, with Xbox Series X and Series S consoles also posting poor sales. Once a gaming juggernaut, Xbox has in recent years fallen behind its rivals Sony and Nintendo. Last November, Xbox was outsold by the motion-controlled Nex Playground console, which was launched in 2023.

“Going forward, we’ll evolve and rebuild our stack, and look at capabilities across all of Xbox and potential M&A [mergers and acquisitions] to help us win in hardware, PC, mobile and streaming,” Sharma said.

Microsoft last announced major layoffs in July 2025, with reports suggesting that the company would cut around 9,000 jobs. Some of Microsoft’s approximately 3,500 Dublin- and Belfast-based employees were affected in the layoffs.

Xbox was expected to be hit the hardest in last year’s round of cuts, which was announced alongside news that the division would be cancelling a number of planned video game projects.

As of the close of Microsoft’s last fiscal year on 30 June 2025, the company employed approximately 228,000 people on a full-time basis, with more than 103,000 based outside the US. According to tech layoffs aggregator Layoffs.fyi, the company cut more than 15,000 jobs in 2025 alone.

Don’t miss out on the knowledge you need to succeed. Sign up for the Daily Brief, Silicon Republic’s digest of need-to-know sci-tech news.

Compare the Top 7 Drip Coffee Makers

Frequently Asked Questions

More Coffee Makers We Like and Love

Photograph: Cavanaugh/Oxo

Oxo Brew 9-Cup Coffee Maker for $250: The 9-cup Oxo (9/10, WIRED Recommends) is a lovely, SCA Golden Cup coffee maker capable of making tasty drip coffee that would please any connoisseur. Five years ago when WIRED reviewed it, it was arguably our favorite batch coffee maker. Alas, the world of drip coffee relentlessly keeps moving forward. It still might be your favorite, given that it costs 40 percent less than my top-pick Aiden and offers a feature that’s indispensable for some: a timer that allows you to schedule your brew overnight, so it’s ready when you wake up.

Oxo 12-Cup Coffee Maker for $350: The Oxo 12-Cup Coffee Maker (8/10, WIRED Recommends) is another previous top pick for as a large-batch brewer, and it’s still a worthwhile choice. This Oxo is not overtly pretty, but, like the Luxe above, it’s SCA-certified, can be set on a delay timer, and can adjust heat and flow rate of its showerhead to account for batches from large to small. Which is to say it wakes up each morning and brews excellence. WIRED contributing reviewer Joe Ray prized, in particular, the machine’s water tank, which operates as a kettle, heating the water precisely before brewing rather than heating up during the brew—a quality quite rare among home brewers.

Photograph: Matthew Korfhage

12-Cup Breville Luxe Brewer for $350: Sometimes nothing less than 12 cups will do. WIRED has previously recommended this big-batch 12-Cup brewer as a top pick for those who want good-tasting coffee in large batches. Among the big boys, this Breville Luxe (7/10, WIRED Recommends), the update on the prior Breville Precision Brewer, has the best feature set and the best capabilities. It can reliably make balanced, aromatic 60-ounce batch of coffee thanks to a lot of technical sophistication under its hood: PID temperature control, water sensors, brew algorithms, customizable settings, the same thermocoils and pumps you’d use to make espresso. It also has an excellent cold brew function, which can make real, actual, cold brew overnight or over the course of the day, timed out with a drip stop. Even so, the device has a number of quirks and particularities in terms of water volume, water left in the reservoir, and an entirely different brew mode for small batches that’s not well explained in the product documentation. After noticing a lot of frustrated user feedback online, I’ve moved this down to my honorable mentions despite the machine’s many admirable qualities.

Photograph: Matthew Korfhage

Ninja Hot and Iced XL for $160: Arguably Ninja’s top-line coffee maker of the moment, the 12-cup Ninja Hot and Iced XL has many features to like: timed brew for sluggish risers, the ability to choose your batch size from single mug to 12-cup carafe without having to measure water, because the device simply sucks the desired amount out of the tank; options on iced coffee and cold brew. It is what Ninja does: It has the features. The coffee is not as well-extracted as our top picks, whether on classic or rich settings. But at its price, and with its many little conveniences, it may still be the coffee machine you desire. It’s best for those who like medium roast or darker, though—it’s not a pick for delicate, aromatic light-roast drinkers.

Ninja 12-Cup Programmable Brewer

Photograph: Matthew Korfhage

Ninja 12-Cup Programmable Brewer for $90: At less than $100, this 12-cup Ninja is a perfectly serviceable brewer with a bloom function, a timer so you can wake up to hot coffee on a hot plate, and a half-batch setting to help optimize your brews. At the same price range, I far prefer a coffee pot from the five-cup Zojirushi Zutto. But if you want to caffeinate an office or community rec room on a budget, this larger budget brewer might still be your choice.

Photograph: Matthew Korfhage

Ninja Dualbrew Hot & Iced Coffee System for $170: Lordy, this one really does it all. Hot coffee, cold coffee, iced coffee, pod coffee. This machine is designed for the family who can’t agree, or the person who wants everything, but only sometimes. It’s among WIRED’s top-pick pod machines for this wild versatility, and while the drip coffee doesn’t stack up to my top picks, it’s perfectly good for those more likely to make the occasional carafe from store bags.

Photograph: Matthew Korfhage

Gevi 10-Cup Touchscreen Brewer for $160: Gevi is a relatively new brand out of China—part of a wave of new appliance makers who’ve moved from manufacturing expertise to product design. And lately, Gevi has been shaking up a lot of assumptions about what goes in a drip coffee maker and what doesn’t. This 10-cup batch brewer, usually on sale around $160, comes with a host of customizable brew settings, a timed-brew delay, and a conical-burr grinder to brew fresh coffee beans—a style of grinder you’d rarely find much below $100 all by itself. The resulting coffee is not at the level of my top picks: The grinder tends to grind too much coffee, and brew times are quite long, a combination that has led to some bitterness unless you adjust your grind to fairly coarse settings. But this Gevi does make brewing drip coffee from fresh coffee beans encouragingly easy and affordable for non-coffee-geeks. If you want a budget coffee maker for pre-ground coffee, though? You should probably get our budget pick five-cup Zojirushi or the 12-cup Ninja instead.

Aarke Coffee Maker With Thermal Carafe for $480: This shiny, SCA-certified Swedish-made system (6/10, WIRED Recommends) is beautiful, in the Swedish modernist sense: It looks like a Turkish tea service has been redesigned into a brand new gasworks. It makes quite lovely coffee. And in a novel twist, the coffee brewer can be paired with the matching flat-burr grinder so the grinder theoretically churns the exact right amount of ground coffee. Alas, this grinder pairing wasn’t quite perfectly calibrated, requiring much tweaking. And though I didn’t have this problem, users online have reported that the grinder jams up very easily—a troubling worry on such an expensive device. I remain nonetheless affectionate.

Other Brewers Tested

Photograph: Matthew Korfhage

Oxo Brew 8-Cup Coffee Maker With Glass Carafe for $180: I leapt at the chance to try an updated version of Oxo’s modern-classic 8-cup coffee maker, now available with a glass carafe and a warmer. When first reviewed in 2020, the Oxo Brew 8-Cup received a rare 9/10 score from WIRED reviewer Joe Ray for its elegant simplicity, its “rainmaker” showerhead meant to mimic the agitation of a pour-over, and a SCA Golden Cup certification attesting that the machine was able to stay within tight temperature and time parameters. Six years later, the coffee flavor and extraction is still amid the upper echelon of drip coffee brewers, at a sub-$200 price that’s a bargain in its class. It no longer being a top pick is simply a sign of how far other drip coffee makers have come—including the newer 9-cup and 12-cup machines from Oxo. In particular, I wish Oxo had since updated the 8-Cup’s showerhead design to be more in line with its newer machines. The six-hole showerhead erodes pits into the brew bed and causes channeling. This adds up to less even extraction than the newer Oxo machines. It’s not that I don’t like the 8-cup, it’s just that I think you should probably get the 9-cup or 12-cup instead.

Mr Coffee Perfect Brew

Photograph: Matthew Korfhage

Mr. Coffee Perfect Brew for $169: This SCA-certified Mr. Coffee brewer amounts to a giant leap forward for the drip-coffee pioneer. It does indeed make an aromatic and flavorful, if somewhat thin-bodied brew. That said, the controls interface is maddening, and the device tries to do too many things without succeeding at all of them: The cold-brew function, in particular, is just a recipe for lukewarm, watered-down coffee. The tea basket is a pleasant addition, however.

Melitta Vision Luxe 12-Cup

Photograph: Matthew Korfhage

Melitta Vision Luxe 12-Cup for $227: This quite large and fetching machine was designed under the Melitta brand by Hong Kong design firm Wabilogic. It’s full of interesting touches like a water reservoir that lights up red when it heats, and a control panel that can swivel for convenience. Alas, I never found a way to get the even extraction I was looking for, and much coffee came out somehow thin but bitter. Worse, the immovable water reservoir stayed constantly humid after brewing—a recipe for either constant cleaning or something worse.

Photograph: Matthew Korfhage

Gevi 10-Cup Grind-and-Brew for $150: This is a slightly lower-cost version of Gevi’s other, more digital 10-cup grind-and-brew device. Both include a built-in conical-burr grinder at a relatively low cost, and making fresh-ground coffee was easy and affordable for many drip coffee lovers. Both also brew similarly, a bit slow and strong, requiring coarser grinds. But at $20 or so more, I recommend Gevi’s touchscreen device instead for two reasons: a removable water tank, and a removable top granting access to the grinder to clear beans or jams or change out the burr. The touchscreen device has both. This one has neither.

Photograph: Matthew Korfhage

Cuisinart Grind and Brew for $250: Cuisinart’s new entrant in single-serve, grind-and-brew coffee machines is a bit of a neither-here-nor-there machine that shows why it’s so hard to find integrated grinder-brewers. The grinder means it’s priced close to the top picks among stand-alone drip brewers that offer delicate and nuanced takes on even pre-ground coffee. But the Cuisinart’s integrated grinder has only one setting—which means the only way to adjust flavor is by adjusting brew strength. This makes it not great for the light or lighter-medium roasts favored by third-wave coffee lovers, the very people who tend to be sticklers about having their coffee ground fresh before brewing. The grinder adds a bit of versatility for those who favor medium-dark roasts, and the conical burr grinder is a step up from a blade grinder. But this machine remains a bit of an odd duck.

De’Longhi TrueBrew for $700: Like a lot of De’Longhi espresso machines, this TrueBrew (4/10, WIRED Recommends) is a superautomated machine with a bean reservoir up top. This one makes something akin to drip, grinding and brewing coffee ranging from a dense, 3-ounce-cup “espresso” to a classic mug. But the “espresso” was weak, and the drip coffee was sad, according to contributor Joe Ray. Plus, the machine was just kind of messy and expensive.

GE Café Specialty Drip Coffee Maker for $299: GE is a big name but a less common one in the world of high-quality coffee. This SCA-certified Café Specialty Drip Coffee Maker (4/10, WIRED Recommends) seemed initially promising, according to contributor Joe Ray, but turned out to extract coffee unevenly and led to flat, coppery flavors—a fatal flaw in a premium-priced machine.

Balmuda The Brew for $699: Balmuda is a brand known for lovable design, and this coffee maker (5/10, WIRED Recommends) is no exception: petite and handsome, with a habit of steam-blasting the coffee carafe in advance of brewing and ticking like a clock as the coffee dribbles down. But it brewed weird, wrote contributor Joe Ray, making concentrate at low temperatures then diluting it with extra water. Maybe it’s cute, but the coffee doesn’t taste good unless you do some serious gymnastics. It also costs a steep $700.

Power up with unlimited access to WIRED. Get best-in-class reporting and exclusive subscriber content that’s too important to ignore. Subscribe Today.

I’ve struggled with insomnia since I was very young. Like many chronic overthinkers, I tend to fall asleep best when my mind is occupied by something else, such as podcasts, YouTube compilations, or my personal favorite: rain sounds. But earbuds can be uncomfortable, and playing audio out loud isn’t exactly considerate when I’m staying at my partner’s place. 

That’s why I was intrigued by the new Peace Duo Under-Pillow Speaker from Jabees.

Launched last month, this ultra-thin speaker utilizes bone conduction technology—which sends vibrations through your skull directly to your inner ear—to transmit sound through your pillow and into your ear privately. Just place it beneath your pillow and listen as you drift off.

In my testing, I found the Peace Duo was so thin that I almost forgot it was there. I mainly used the built-in sleep sounds, which come preloaded on a micro SD card with four hours of soothing soundscapes, including gentle waves, light rain, rain with thunder, and soft wind. For more personal content, the Peace Duo also offers Bluetooth connectivity, so you can connect your phone and stream your favorite audio.

Battery life is another standout. A single charge lasts up to ten nights of one-hour listening sessions, so you won’t have to remember yet another device that requires nightly charging. The foldable design also makes it easy to put away in the included magnetic fabric travel case.

There is one important caveat: it doesn’t work well with thick memory foam pillows. Unfortunately, that’s what I normally use, so I switched to a regular cotton pillow and the sound came through clearly. (The company claims that thinner memory foam pillows should work fine.)

Priced at $59.99, the Peace Duo comes in two colors: Sunrise Yellow and Mist Green. It also offers personalization; users can swap out the magnetic snap-on frames for custom images and even add their names, making it a great gift for families, students, or anyone who needs extra help getting restful sleep.

The Peace Duo won’t cure insomnia, but it’s a practical, unobtrusive sleep gadget — and for what the company is charging, it’s a small price for a decent night’s sleep.

Google may have a workaround for Pixel owners whose phones have been trapped in a bootloop following recent software updates.

While the company has largely directed affected users to contact support, some users have found success using Google’s Software Repair tool. This tool can reinstall a device’s software and potentially bring a bricked Pixel back to life.

For anyone unfamiliar with the issue, a bootloop occurs when a phone repeatedly restarts without ever fully loading into Android. On Pixel devices, that often means getting stuck on the Google logo before rebooting again, effectively rendering the handset unusable.

The Software Repair tool isn’t a guaranteed fix, but it appears to have worked for at least some users dealing with the problem. The catch is that you’ll need access to a computer, as the process requires connecting your Pixel and reinstalling its software from scratch.

Anthropic’s AI restrictions caused concern among founders, researchers and developers following the release of the Mythos-like model.

It was just this week that Anthropic launched Claude Fable 5, an AI model that the company described as “Mythos-class”, but with additional significant security restrictions in place to prevent misuse. 

Already, however, the organisation is facing backlash from founders, researchers and developers who find the ‘secretive’ large language model (LLM) policies to be deliberately limiting competitors and users in the development of alternative AI models. 

In its statement announcing the availability of Claude Fable 5, Anthropic explained that the model has barriers designed to block responses that stray into high-risk areas – notably cybersecurity, chemistry and biology. Such interactions, it stated, would instead be rerouted to Opus 4.8, a less powerful model.

This has reportedly drawn some criticism from researchers and developers in the AI space, as there is a concern that work derived this way is deliberately degraded in a manner that is invisible and secretive. 

Anthropic has since responded to the backlash, indicating plans to address the issue by making Claude 5’s safety rails visible to all users. If the company suspects that a user is attempting to develop their own high-powered AI system, it will send a clear prompt informing them that the request is being refused based on policy, or that it is being rerouted to a less capable model. 

It is currently against Anthropic’s terms of service to use Claude technology as a means of training competing AI models. 

In a statement to Wired, a representative for Anthropic said, “We’re changing Fable 5’s safeguards for frontier LLM development to make them visible. We made the wrong trade-off and we apologise for not getting the balance right.”

Among the critics of Anthropic’s decision-making was Dean Ball, a senior fellow at the Foundation for American Innovation and a former adviser to the White House on AI. In a post published on X, Ball described deliberately degrading “ML research” performance without informing the user as a “shockingly hostile and terrible look”. 

He further explained its potential to “silently damage all sorts of work” and “raise the eyebrows of antitrust enforcers worldwide.”

Don’t miss out on the knowledge you need to succeed. Sign up for the Daily Brief, Silicon Republic’s digest of need-to-know sci-tech news.