The officer is also accused of failing to comply with tax obligations after receiving more than £20,000 through online sales

A Cambridgeshire Police officer has been accused of unauthorised business activities. PC Awuah will face a misconduct hearing into allegations that he failed to comply with tax obligations after receiving more than £20,000 through online sales between 2018 and 2023.

PC Awuah faces four allegations against him, including receiving a £5,000 bounce back loan for a business – with inaccurate information regarding turnover submitted in the application. Allegedly, the funds were used for non-business purposes.

The officer is also accused of selling items online between December 2022 and April 2024, following the refusal of two business applications in May 2021. It is alleged that this breached the business interest and secondary employment procedure.

He is also accused of breaching the relevant notifiable association policy in regards to one of the four allegations.

The hearing, on Monday, June 22, at Lysander House in Tempsford will consider whether the officer breached the standards of professional behaviour to the level of gross misconduct. This is in areas of honest and integrity, orders and instructions, duties and responsibilities and discreditable conduct.

He had previously been convicted of a sex offence in 2009

A man who sexually assaulted a Good Samaritan who tried to help him after he had collapsed from drink and drugs has been jailed. Brenden Clarke, 33, has been locked up for a year after an incident where he collapsed on Bourges Boulevard in Peterborough on February 4 this year.

Two women who had spotted Clarke while driving past pulled over to help and called an ambulance. As he came round, one of the women helped Clarke sit against a wall and remained with him to monitor him.

But Clarke, who was previously convicted of a sexual offence in 2009, began making sexual gestures towards her and tried to kiss her. The victim immediately stood up to create distance and told him to stop.

Clarke then made further sexual comments and, unsteady on his feet, attempted to walk into the road, forcing traffic to come to a halt. The victim encouraged him back onto the pavement.

Clarke said he did not want to wait for medical help and claimed he was going to the probation office. Concerned he may walk into the road again the two women walked with him.

However, while walking, Clarke again approached the same victim, sexually assaulted her and attempted to kiss her. She removed his grasp and loudly told him to stop and keep his distance. He repeated this behaviour before the victim pushed him towards a wall and he stopped.

On June 10 at Peterborough Crown Court, Clarke, of no fixed abode but from the Peterborough area, was sentenced to one year in prison and placed on the Sex Offender Register for ten years. He had pleaded guilty to sexual assault and failing to comply with notification requirements of the Sex Offenders Register.

PC Niamh Skipworth, who investigated, said: “This was a distressing incident for the woman was trying to help someone she believed needed medical attention. Clarke’s behaviour was disgraceful and left the victim shaken.

“I would like to commend the victim for her courage in reporting what happened and for the support she provided to officers throughout the investigation. This case demonstrates that sexual offending of any kind will be taken seriously, and we will continue to work to bring offenders before the courts.”

Donny Strathie, from Grangemouth, had travelled to the United States to support Scotland in the World Cup but he died suddenly in Boston on Sunday, June 14, aged 76

A devoted member of the Tartan Army has died in Boston while following Scotland at the World Cup – passing away before he got to see his beloved team kick a ball at the tournament.

Donny Strathie, from Grangemouth, Falkirk, passed away suddenly in Boston on Sunday, June 14, aged 76, reports the Daily Record.

The lifelong Scotland supporter had made the journey to the United States to cheer on Steve Clarke’s men on the grandest stage in football, and had even secured his ticket for Friday night’s fixture against Morocco. Heartbreakingly, he never lived to see the match he had longed to attend.

Now, his family, friends and fellow supporters are calling on the Tartan Army to unite and pay their respects during the game. A poster circulating on social media is urging Scotland fans to join in a minute’s applause during the 76th minute of the World Cup clash, in tribute to Donny’s age.

Advertisement

It reads: “One minute applause tribute to Donny Strathie. Tartan Army footsoldier who died in Boston on Sunday, June 14. Share and spread the word: One minute applause tribute in the 76th minute of Scotland v Morocco.

“Donny sadly passed away suddenly in Boston on Sunday aged 76. He had his ticket to the match and it was his dream to see Scotland in the World Cup but he never got the chance. Lets make him proud.”

Donny was a well-respected figure in his local community and served as captain of the Bowhouse Pool team. His daughters, Denise Strathie and Cheryl Strathie, have both shared cherished photographs of their father in his honour as an outpouring of love and support continues to pour in for the beloved man.

Cheryl Strathie shared the appeal, saying: “Please share on any platform. Let’s see if we can all make this happen Dad.”

Lynne Easton responded to a tribute photo posted by Denise Strathie, saying: “So so sorry about your Dad. We are all gutted and sending our love. A great guy who lived life the right way from his parish walks to his football and his family. Love to you all and here to help in any way.”

Karen Keegan McPheat said: “So very sad. He was so lovely and cheery. He was saying last week to watch out for him on tv. He will be missed.”

Posting in the Falkirk Chit Chat Pool League group, David Jerrett wrote: “Just heard sad news Donny Strathie, a stalwart of the pool league for years, captain of the Bowhouse has passed away. He was in Boston watching his beloved Scotland. Rest easy pal from the pool world.”

Lee Stevenson said: “Oh that’s so sad. I’m glad the last thing he did was doing something he loved. I hope he saw Scotland win their first match.”

Graham Rae added: “Such a shock. He was in ours just before he went away? Great guy as well. RIP.”

Cristiano Ronaldo has urged Portugal to believe they can finally win the World Cup.

Ronaldo will be competing in what will be a record-equalling sixth tournament.

The biggest prize of all also remains the one trophy to have eluded the footballing icon throughout his glittering career.

He knows at the age of 41, this could be his last chance complete his remarkable haul of trophies.

Portugal kick off their World Cup campaign with an opening game against DR Congo in Houston tomorrow (WED).

And Ronaldo wants Roberto Martinez’s men to leave nothing behind in the quest to conquer the world.

He said: “Every time we wear this jersey, we feel the same pride, the same passion and the same sense of responsibility as on the first day.

“Tomorrow begins a new chapter.

“We worked hard to reach this moment, and now it’s time to give everything for our country, and for all the Portuguese communities that support us here and around the world. Believe it like we do.”

Martinez, meanwhile, will face the media later, when he is expected to address speculation he will stand down as Portugal manager at the end of the tournament.

The UK government’s decision to introduce restrictions on children’s access to social media marks a significant moment in the evolution of online safety policy. For supporters, it represents a long-overdue response to growing concerns about children’s wellbeing. For critics, it raises questions about effectiveness, enforcement and unintended consequences.

Yet regardless of where one stands on the policy itself, its announcement provides an opportunity to reflect on a broader question: what exactly has this debate been about?

At one level, the answer appears straightforward. Public concern about children’s social media use has grown steadily over recent years. It has been fuelled by worries about a wide range of issues, from mental health and body image to online exploitation, misinformation and the changing nature of childhood itself. The government’s proposals are intended to respond to these concerns and reduce young people’s exposure to risk.

À lire aussi :
UK under-16 social media ban: what parents need to know

Yet one of the striking features of the debate is that the phrase “social media harms” has come to encompass an extraordinary range of anxieties. Depending on who is speaking, the problem may be cyberbullying, pornography, misogynistic influencers, loneliness, political polarisation, declining attention spans, excessive screen time, image-based abuse or the feeling that childhood is becoming increasingly mediated through screens.

These concerns are real and deserving of attention but they do not necessarily share the same causes or solutions.

When multiple anxieties become bundled together, it becomes tempting to seek a single response. Yet many of the challenges that worry parents, educators and policymakers are not solely technological in nature.

Young people were navigating body image pressures long before social media. Bullying and social exclusion existed before smartphones. Concerns about unrealistic representations of sex and relationships and success have existed for decades. Young people have always had to negotiate questions of identity, belonging, popularity and status.

Social media may amplify these dynamics, but it does not create them from nothing. Understanding this distinction is important because it shapes how we understand both the problem and the solution. If online harms are understood primarily as problems of access, restricting access becomes the obvious response. If they are understood as the product of interactions between technology, relationships, culture and wider social conditions, the picture becomes considerably more complicated.

Changing relationships with tech

As a researcher who studies young people’s digital lives, what has struck me most throughout these debates is that many discussions about children and social media are not really about children and social media alone. They are also conversations about how adults feel about technology more generally.

Over the past two decades, digital technologies have transformed how people communicate, access information, form relationships and participate in public life. For much of that period, these developments were discussed primarily in terms of opportunity, innovation and connection. Increasingly, however, public conversations about technology are framed through the language of risk, uncertainty and loss.

Concerns about social media sit alongside wider unease about the power of technology companies. They accompany fears about the commercialisation of attention, the collection of personal data, the spread of misinformation and the growing influence of algorithms over everyday life.

À lire aussi :
Banning social media for under-16s won’t fix the real problem – the business model of these platforms is dangerous for all of us

Right now, debates about children’s social media use are unfolding against a backdrop of rapid technological change more broadly. The emergence of generative AI, deepfakes and increasingly sophisticated algorithmic systems has intensified public uncertainty about the role technology should play in society.

Parents, educators and policymakers are being asked to make decisions about technologies whose long-term implications remain unclear. Researchers are trying to study developments that evolve faster than evidence can often keep pace with. Schools are preparing young people for futures that are difficult to imagine.

In this context, proposals to restrict children’s access to social media can offer something that is often in short supply: a sense of certainty and control. They provide a visible intervention that governments can announce, institutions can implement and parents can understand. Faced with complex and rapidly evolving challenges, there is understandable appeal in policies that appear to offer a clear solution.

However, there is an important difference between taking action and resolving a problem.

What happens next?

One of the lessons emerging from international experience, including developments in Australia, is that the effectiveness of such restrictions remains uncertain. Young people may migrate to alternative platforms or create hidden accounts. They may become less willing to discuss their online experiences with trusted adults. Some may lose access to online communities, information or support networks that play an important role in their lives. The available evidence does not yet allow us to confidently conclude that restricting access will produce the wide-ranging benefits that many hope for.

This does not necessarily mean that restrictions are misguided. It does, however, suggest that policies can sometimes provide reassurance before we know whether they will meaningfully reduce harm. In that sense, there is a risk that social media bans become partly performative. They demonstrate that something is being done and may provide a welcome sense of action in the face of uncertainty. Yet they can also encourage the belief that a complex problem is being solved when many of the underlying issues remain unresolved.

À lire aussi :
Australia has already banned social media for under 16s – here’s what the UK can learn from the experience

Perhaps the greatest danger is not that restrictions fail, but that they succeed just enough to convince us that the work is done.

Even if age restrictions prove effective, young people will still eventually enter digital environments. They will still need to understand how algorithms shape the information they encounter. They will still need to evaluate misinformation, navigate relationships online, recognise manipulation and make sense of increasingly complex digital cultures. They will still require opportunities to develop critical thinking, digital literacy and healthy relationship skills.

More fundamentally, questions about the design of digital environments themselves will remain. If our concerns centre on addictive design, algorithmic amplification, misinformation or the concentration of power among technology companies, then restricting children’s access addresses only part of the issue. The broader challenge concerns the nature of the digital spaces that all of us inhabit.

Council says Stormont programme is primarily resourced to support prevention activity, rather than provision of services for women

A Northern Ireland council is making a call for a large emergency fund for Women’s Aid services, and has criticised Stormont focus on preventative action at the expense of refuge for victims.

Elected representatives at an Ards and North Down Borough Council committee meeting unanimously agreed a motion this week highlighting increased disclosures and referrals, particularly to Women’s Aid services, as a result of a lack of funding for provision.

The council is asking for a new dedicated emergency fund. The motion will go to the full meeting of the council later this month, where it is expected to pass.

READ MORE: Old County Down woodland saved from housing development by community

READ MORE: Council to spend nearly 100K to restore statue of Napoleonic war hero

In Ards and North Down, over the last three years referrals for floating support have increased by over 33 percent and referrals for refuge have increased by over 186 percent.

At a meeting in Newtownards of the council’s Active and Healthy Communities Committee on Monday (June 16), councillors agreed to the motion, forwarded by UUP Councillors Peter Wray and Katherine Newman, which acknowledges increased demand for service experienced by North Down and Ards Women’s Aid.

The motion firstly commits to write to the Minister for Communities requesting a review into the funding provided to Women’s Aid through the Northern Ireland Housing Executive Supporting People Grant.

It secondly commits to write to the Northern Ireland Executive welcoming the funding provided so far, but expressing concerns that the Ending Violence Against Women and Girls programme is primarily resourced to support prevention activity, rather than provision of services.

The motion states: “While investment in prevention is essential, it is already resulting in increased disclosures and referrals, particularly to Women’s Aid services. The letter should also highlight the need for multiyear funding, and increased funding allocation for the Tier 3 EVAWG programme, which currently doesn’t cover the cost of one additional member of staff.”

The letter will also propose the establishment of a dedicated emergency fund in Northern Ireland to support women who are fleeing domestic abuse but face immediate financial barriers to accessing safety.

The motion states: “Many women, particularly those who are working or have limited access to benefits, are unable to afford refuge accommodation costs or secure private rental housing due to high upfront expenses such as deposits and rent in advance. As a result, they are often forced to remain in unsafe environments or face homelessness.

“This fund would provide flexible, rapid financial assistance to cover emergency costs, refuge stays, and access to long -term housing, ensuring that no woman is prevented from leaving an abusive situation due to a lack of financial resources.”

For all the latest news, visit the Belfast Live homepage here and sign up to our daily newsletter here.

The young boy, who was under the age of 18, was pronounced dead at the scene following the fatal cycling accident in Lismore

Advertisement

A young boy has tragically lost his life after colliding with a stationary lorry while cycling in Waterford.

The devastating incident took place in Ballygalane, Lismore, shortly after 11am this morning.

The youngster, who was under the age of 18, was declared dead at the scene. His body has been removed to the mortuary at University Hospital Waterford, where a post-mortem examination will be carried out in due course, reports the Irish Mirror.

The lorry driver was unhurt. The road was temporarily shut to allow for an examination of the scene but has now been reopened.

In a statement, Gardai confirmed they are “appealing for witnesses following a fatal road traffic collision in Ballygalane, Lismore, Co. Waterford this morning Tuesday 16th June, 2026.”

“The collision involved a parked lorry and a pedal cyclist and occurred shortly after 11:00am.

“A juvenile male, pedal cyclist was fatally injured and was pronounced deceased at the scene. His body has been removed to the mortuary at University Hospital Waterford where a post-mortem examination will take place in due course.

“The coroner has been notified. The male driver of the lorry was uninjured.

“The road was closed for technical examination by Garda Forensic Collision Investigators and has since reopened.

“Gardaí are appealing to anyone who witnessed this collision to come forward.

“Road users who may have camera footage (including dash-cam) and were travelling on the N72 between Lismore and Cappoquin, Co. Waterford this morning between 10.30am and 11.15am 16th June, 2026 are asked to make this available to investigating Gardaí.

“Anyone with any information is asked to contact Dungarvan Garda Station on (058) 48600, the Garda Confidential Line on 1800 666 111, or any Garda Station.

“Investigations are ongoing.”

The UK State Pension age is increasing from 66 to 67 in monthly increments between April 2026 and March 2028

Advertisement

Individuals are being advised to check their State Pension age following the long-anticipated rise from 66 to 67, which began in April. The gradual increase over the coming two years means those born in the early 1960s may no longer retire at 66, with their State Pension age instead being determined by their precise date of birth.

The State Pension age is set to climb from 66 to 67 between now and March 2028. Those born between April 6, 1960 and March 5, 1961 will find their retirement age pushed past 66, with the exact figure dependent on their date of birth.

For some individuals, this could mean waiting several additional months before they become eligible to receive State Pension payments. The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) is urging those nearing retirement to confirm their State Pension age so they are fully aware of when they will qualify.

DWP said: “Between April 2026 and March 2028, the State Pension age will gradually rise from 66 to 67, affecting those born on or after 6 April 1960. Use the free State Pension age calculator on GOV.UK to find your exact age – you just need your date of birth. You can also use the Check your State Pension forecast tool to see how much you might get and if you can increase it, for example, by filling any gaps in your record.”

A further key consideration is that the State Pension does not commence automatically – individuals must proactively submit a claim as they approach their State Pension age. The Pension Service typically dispatches an invitation letter approximately four months prior to an individual reaching their State Pension age, outlining how to submit a claim, reports the Daily Record.

DWP said: “Remember, your State Pension doesn’t start automatically. The Pension Service will write to you around four months before you reach State Pension age to invite you to apply.”

Verifying your State Pension age is straightforward and can be completed online by inputting your date of birth into the UK Government’s official State Pension age calculator.

The full New State Pension is now worth £241.30 a week, some £995.20 every four-week payment period. The precise sum an individual receives is determined by their National Insurance record.

Most people need around 35 qualifying years of National Insurance Contributions (NICs) to receive the full New State Pension, while those with fewer years may receive a reduced amount. You need 10 years of NICs to qualify for any State Pension payments.

The rise in State Pension age forms part of long-term UK Government plans intended to account for increasing life expectancy and the escalating costs of pension funding.

Further increases are already scheduled, with the State Pension age anticipated to climb to 68 in the mid-2040s, though the precise timeline for this adjustment remains under review.

For the time being, the DWP states that the focus is on ensuring those approaching retirement are aware of when they will become entitled to the State Pension and how to claim it.

Check your State Pension age Use the free online tool available at GOV.UK to check your State Pension age and find out when you are eligible to retire and begin claiming your State Pension.

SHERMAN, Texas (AP) — Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang — whose work helped enable artificial intelligence — stressed in an Associated Press interview Tuesday that society has no choice but to change in the advent of AI.

Huang has been optimistic about the technology’s potential to rapidly change society, creating faster economic growth and more scientific breakthroughs. But as the head of a computer chip company now developing AI systems, Huang has felt obligated to respond to critics who warn of job losses and threats to humanity itself.

“We need to create new social norms,” Huang said in an interview. “I would advocate that everybody use AI. Just go engage it.”

Huang made his case as AI has emerged as a political flashpoint, with objections to plans to build more data centers and fears that the speed with which it’s being adopted could spur the layoffs of workers who might not have a safety net. Such questions have threatened public support of the technology.

His close relationship with President Donald Trump has been a source of criticism among Democrats, even as he makes the case that the computing power created by AI is key to adding the factory jobs that have been promised for decades without much enduring success.

He said the ability of AI to build a website, analyze complex documents, guide advanced research or even plan a kitchen remodeling has helped to close the technological divide in America. People can now do advanced work on computers without having to know how to program or write software, he added.

Huang stressed that there is a need for government regulation and safety standards for AI, emphasizing that national security also needed to be a priority for the technology that has been powering stock market gains and much of the U.S. economy in recent years.

The head of the world’s most valuable company said society will adapt to AI just as it did to automobiles. He said cars were once portrayed as killing children, but the world changed its norms by having sidewalks and crosswalks and stopping kids from playing in the streets.

“When I was growing up, I used to play in the streets,” Huang said. “When cars came along, you obviously can’t play in the streets now.”

Huang skeptical of what government ownership of AI companies would achieve

With a market capitalization of roughly $5 trillion, Nvidia has soared in valuation in recent years to become the world’s most valuable company. AI modeling companies OpenAI and Anthropic are potentially set to also clear the $1 trillion mark once their stocks are publicly traded.

That explosive surge in wealth concentrated in AI companies has prompted renewed worries about economic inequality. Trump has tried to defuse those concerns, recently musing about the prospect that the U.S. government could own some shares in AI firms, so any windfalls would be more broadly shared with the public. That idea has also been advanced by Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and even OpenAI CEO Sam Altman.

Huang expressed skepticism about the idea, saying he expects the country will already benefit broadly from AI advancements.

“I’m not exactly sure what they’re trying to achieve,” he said regarding government ownership. “I haven’t had a dialogue with them about that. But just remember that these are American companies. Their success benefits the stock price, of which many Americans are investors in. It generates taxes, which helps many Americans. It creates a lot of jobs.”

He noted that AI companies could also lead to higher profits for energy, construction and hardware technology firms.

“Americans have a stake in American companies already, naturally, in a whole lot of different ways,” Huang said.

Huang says national security needs to be a priority on AI

The Trump administration has recently reversed course from using a light touch on regulating AI to taking a heavier hand.

It placed export controls on the AI company Anthropic’s latest models, leading the company on Friday to shutter all public access to those models over security concerns. Trump, a Republican, also signed an order to have new AI models voluntarily vetted by the government.

Huang said the government was properly focused on national security issues, but it was important to provide clear guidance when taking restrictive actions, as doing so could lead to unintended consequences.

“National security should always be the top concern of all technologies,” Huang said. “But having said that, you know, you have to be very specific about the risk that you’re concerned about, before setting up policies for export controls.”

During the Biden administration, Nvidia pushed back against export controls that were designed to restrict its ability to sell chips to China, rejecting the administration’s premise that a ban would guarantee an American edge on AI. Huang had warned that the export controls might limit America’s ability to develop the world’s AI ecosystem, as China would respond with its own advanced chips.

Huang says energy is key problem for America’s AI development

Huang stressed that while the U.S. has many strengths on AI, it is vulnerable because of a lacking energy infrastructure. The data centers performing the computations used in AI are creating a huge demand for electricity, which could be a strain on the power grid.

Some data centers will be constructed with their own electricity sources, but Huang said the U.S. is starting from a disadvantage on energy. And without more energy, it can be harder to play to American strengths in its AI infrastructure, models and computer chip development.

“The United States is woefully behind in energy production,” Huang said. “We just suffocated energy production for too long.”

Huang complimented Trump on his approach to seeking to increase energy production. The president has aggressively supported the use of oil, coal and natural gas, but he has scorned the use of solar and wind power.

The Nvidia CEO was not commenting on Trump’s opposition to climate-friendlier energy sources, but the gap he identified goes to some of the fears that U.S. households have about AI increasing their utility bills.

Huang was speaking Tuesday in Sherman, Texas, at an expansion of the Coherent factory to develop a laser for transmitting data among chips, which could cut power use by AI systems by up to 50%.

Trump’s fondness for Huang started at a Mar-a-Lago dinner

Trump, not known for technological expertise, quickly developed a friendship with Huang. The president has called him “smart,” a “friend” and “amazing,” insisting that Huang accompany him on foreign trips. Most recently, Trump had Air Force One pick up the leather-jacketed CEO in Alaska while en route to his state visit to China.

Their relationship started last year with an invitation to dinner at Mar-a-Lago, Trump’s home and private club in Florida. Huang was in the area to receive the Edison Achievement Award for his AI work.

“He says drop by for dinner, and so I did,” Huang said. He went with his wife, Lori.

“He was incredibly engaging, incredibly charismatic, conversational, asked a lot of questions,” Huang recalled. “From the moment that I met him, the only thing that he’s ever talked to me about is creating more jobs, reindustrializing the United States, protecting national security, winning.” He added that Trump “calls me in the middle of the night and wants to talk about one of these topics.”

But his proximity to Trump has also led to criticism from Democratic lawmakers. Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., objected to Huang not testifying before a Senate committee even as “he has time to attend a $1 million-a-head dinner at Mar-a-Lago.”

Huang said he wants the U.S. president and other officials — regardless of party — to succeed. “We could differ with politics, but we should want him to succeed,” he said. “Because when President Trump succeeds, our country succeeds.”