Here we go again, repeating our mantra that the markets are too high and vulnerable to declines. Adding to our argument, interest rates are now on the rise around the world. Stock prices have ignored this, increasing risk, especially if rates continue to rise, which appears likely in the near term.
Interest rates impact everything from valuations (as discount rates adjust) to borrowing costs. The bloated U.S. federal government deficit has been further exacerbated by defense spending and escalating interest rates, since interest expense—the debt burden—was already a disproportionate amount of the federal budget. A vicious cycle could follow if the Treasury is forced to post even higher rates to attract buyers to its continuous bond offerings.
Bond yields are primarily rising because of inflation. Core PCE, the U.S. inflation rate excluding food and energy, is running at 3.3% annually. Producer prices have leaped materially and have yet to be passed on to consumers. As a result, it’s ironic that the new Fed chair will likely need to boost administered short-term rates despite the President’s insistence otherwise. Either way, the bond market is doing its job by increasing rates, requiring a higher yield to offset risks.
Advertisement
Investors aren’t being compensated sufficiently given current market levels. Real yields (net of inflation) for short-term bonds are negative. Credit spreads between government bonds and corporates are tight, so reaching for yield is also generally unattractive. And based on several valuation metrics that have accurately forecast subsequent returns historically, forward annualized returns for the S&P 500 over the next several years are negative.
Record Low Consumer Sentiment
Consumer sentiment, which is normally high when the economy and stock markets are buoyant, is making new record lows, likely attributable to rising inflation expectations, polarized politics, falling home prices, AI-related layoffs, and the war with Iran. It’s not just a U.S. phenomenon; UK confidence is also at an all-time low. Credit card delinquencies in the U.S. are at their highest levels since 2008, car loan defaults are at multi-decade highs, and student loan delinquencies are at record-high levels. Consumers are clearly feeling pinched. Walmart (WMT) noted that their customers are fueling up less than 10 gallons per fill-up, topping off tanks since gas prices are so high. Inflation impinging upon real income growth and savings rates have also diminished.
Despite this, stock markets have powered higher. AI-related capital spending has been a significant driver of GDP growth—in Q1, all growth was attributable to AI and federal government spending. It’s propelled corporate earnings higher too.
Only time will tell whether we’ve been in a period of irrational exuberance or that the markets have been forecasting a period ahead of unusual prosperity.
Advertisement
While market bottoms tend to occur in a flash, tops are usually longer drawn-out processes. Since the U.S. stock markets now appear to be priced for perfection, right at TRAC™ ceilings, with a current seasonal headwind and rising interest rates, we suspect a rollover is imminent.
Too Many Record Highs
Primarily because of rising inflation, yields on 30-year bonds have increased to 15 to 20-year highs in the U.S., UK, France, and Japan. While the correlation between stocks and bonds has been quite low historically, they’ve moved much more in tandem since 2022. If rates keep rising, bonds should fall and, in turn, share prices too.
Since Producer Price increases are running so high, record-high profit margins are vulnerable, especially since companies may be unlikely to pass price increases along. Net profit margins (now nearly 14%) are cyclical, having fallen to 8% or below on 5 separate occasions in the last 25 years. Free cash flows are already under pressure because capital spending on AI projects has surged.
Earnings expectations appear too high. Long-term growth estimates are about 19%. Previous peaks in expectations occurred in 2000, 2018, and 2021, and each subsequently led to substantial market declines.
Advertisement
The stock market is overly concentrated. Nvidia (NVDA) and Apple (AAPL) alone are over 15% of the S&P 500. The top 10 stocks now exceed a record high 40% of the index value. Nvidia’s market cap alone has surpassed the entire Russell 2000 small cap index. Concentration may be masking the broader picture. During several recent record high days, more stocks declined than rose.
Allocations to stocks remain at record highs, which has also corresponded with market tops.
Asset managers remain overweight equities and individual investors have been using disproportionate amounts of leverage. Buying on margin and call option buying are at record highs, as is exposure to leveraged ETFs. The Market Vane Bullish Percentage index (an indicator that measures trader sentiment) is as high as it ever gets. An abundance of market optimism usually does not auger well for future returns.
The Cypress Capital Market Risk Index, that gauges vulnerability to major market drawdowns, hit 100%, its most elevated level, a mark that was only achieved near the market peaks in 1973, 2000, 2007, and 2021. In each of those instances, a much more attractive market risk level, below 40%, presented itself withing 24 months.
Advertisement
Furthermore, the seasonal period just ahead typically provides poor stock market performance. May to November has underperformed historically, but it’s much worse during a midterm election year. There’s only been one up May-to-November period for the S&P 500 in a midterm election year since the early 1960s. And the average decline from intra-year highs is 18%. Though the period that follows, through the following April, has had double-digit annualized returns with no down periods since 1950.
For the Record
With a GDP growth rate of -0.1% for Q1, Canada just triggered a technical recession—two consecutive quarter of negative GDP growth. The Purchasing Managers Index, based on surveys of executives, is showing contraction for the eurozone, though it’s still above 50, indicating expansion, in the U.S.
Economic weakness should ultimately act to suppress inflation. Because major economies, such as China, Japan, and Europe rely so heavily on oil and gas imports, this alone should quell growth thereby suppressing inflation—high prices are the cure for high prices.
As such, we continue to hedge, holding short positions (where authorized) or inverse long ETFs.
Advertisement
We have been anticipating a recession because the yield curve previously inverted, monetary growth has been weak, and unemployment is likely to rise. Our economic composite, TEC™, alerted us to a U.S. recession some time ago, though one has yet to occur.
While the current bout of inflation may carry forward for several months, it should dissipate. Ultimately, secular forces from high debt levels, poor demographics, and AI-related job losses and competitive threats should lower growth and result in disinflation. Though, if governments excessively print money to cover high budget deficits, inflation could remain problematic.
Our Model Portfolios
Our managed accounts are invested based on one or more of our Models (particular investment strategies with notional allocations of securities). A managed account’s holdings will generally be similar to its applicable Model’s, but may not hold all of them based on client-specific factors (income requirements, tax-related considerations, requests/restrictions, and cash available for purchases) and/or market forces which impact specific investment decisions from time to time.
The following descriptions of the holdings in our managed accounts are intended only to explain the reasons that we have made, and continue to hold, these investments in the accounts we manage for you and are not intended as advice or recommendations with respect to purchasing, selling or holding the securities described. Below, we discuss each of our new holdings and updates on key holdings if there have been material developments.
Advertisement
All Cap Model
The All Cap Model combines selections from our large cap strategy (Global Insight) with our small and medium cap ideas. We generally prefer large cap companies for their superior liquidity and lower volatility. The smaller cap positions tend to be less liquid and more volatile; however, we may hold these positions where they are cheaper, trading at relatively greater discounts to our Fair Market Value (FMV) estimates, making their risk/reward profiles favourable.
Orca Energy Group (ORXIF) recently announced that it entered into an agreement to divest its Tanzanian business, along with its associated commitments and liabilities. Should the transaction be completed, the company would be positioned to distribute a significant portion of its cash holdings to shareholders.
Our large cap positions are summarized in the Global Insight section.
Global Insight (Large Cap) Model
Global Insight portfolios hold large cap stocks (typically with market caps over $5 billion at the time of purchase but may include those in the $2-5 billion range) where portfolios are managed Long/Short or Long only. At an average of less than 70 cents-on-the-dollar versus our FMV estimates, our Global Insight holdings appear much cheaper, in aggregate, than the overall market.
Advertisement
In the last few months, we have made several changes in our large-cap positions. We bought Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP), Eli Lilly and Company (LLY), United Health Services (UHS),and WSP Global (WSPOF). We sold Cenovus Energy (CVE), Diamondback Energy (FANG), Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste (ASR), Veolia Environement (VEOEY), and ServiceNow (NOW) (after buying it recently), after each ran up TRAC™ceilings near our FMV estimates and Henkel (HENKY) after it inflected down from a TRAC™ceiling.
Keurig Dr Pepper is one of the largest beverage companies in the U.S. Its portfolio includes Dr Pepper, A&W root beer, Snapple, Ghost energy drinks, Mott’s, and the Keurig coffee brewer. Last August, the company announced the acquisition of Peet’s Coffee. Investors reacted negatively. However, the acquisition appears to be a smart addition to the portfolio, especially in a post-GLP world where calorie-light coffee and energy drinks have become preferred indulgences. Though integration risk remains as with any substantial acquisition. The company now plans to split into two companies, Global Coffee Co. and Beverage Co., focused on its iconic non-coffee beverage brands. Investors have started to see the vision. Our FMV estimate is $38.
Eli Lilly and Company’s recent results have been astounding: Q1 revenue rose 56% on strong sales of key products such as Mounjaro, Zepbound, Ebglyss, and Jaypirca. Free cash flow was nearly $12 billion for the last twelve months. The company’s “key products” group, which is driving growth, generated over $13 billion of revenue, up from just $1 billion at the start of 2023. Lilly has a 60% U.S. market share in incretin analogues, and just surpassed Novo Nordisk (NVO)’s international market share. Volatility in the company’s share price has picked up around results relating to its and its key competitor’s GLP-1 efficacy. The price has risen to our $1,100 FMV estimate, but with over 30 therapies in Phase 3 and exciting technology such as VERVE-102 gene editing therapy, we are likely to raise our estimated value.
United Health Services provides acute care through hospitals and outpatient facilities and behavioural health services, primarily through inpatient centres. First quarter results were weak due to weather, a soft flu season, and volatility in state directed payments, health insurance exchange mix, and supplemental Medicaid. Medicaid-related operations accounted for 29% of 2025 revenue; however, looking at the core business model, there’s steady demand for acute and behavioural health care which should translate to mid-single-digit top-line growth and high-single-digit earnings growth. The move into virtual care, with the recent acquisition of Talkspace (TALK), a leader in virtual outpatient behavioural health care with over 6,000 licensed professionals, is underappreciated. The transaction should be accretive in the first 12 months post-close. Our FMV estimate is $240.
Advertisement
WSP Global is one of the world’s largest engineering consulting firms. The share price has been highly correlated to the software sector, investors seemingly believing that AI poses an existential threat. This appears misguided since AI should be additive for WSP. First, AI enables better design, boosts productivity, and enhances customer relationships. Second, WSP is winning data centre business, from site due diligence to data centre design, with contract win rates of 75%. Data centre power demand has exposed outdated infrastructure around the world; WSP is seeing solid growth in the U.S. and was recently appointed to the Northern Powergrid’s Engineering Services Framework to support the delivery of power to 8 million UK residents across design, planning, engineering, and commissioning. Top-line growth should be mid-single-digits and free cash flow should hit $2 billion by 2030. Our FMV estimate is $250.
Multifaceted Diversification
We can construct portfolios with multiple unique return drivers—strategies that differ in style and approach—based on bottom-up fundamentals, macro tools, or pure quantitative analysis. This can provide exposure to different styles and asset classes beyond just stock and bond indexes. The approach aims to limit volatility and drawdowns by combining investment strategies, especially where returns are less correlated. The goal is to outperform through economic cycles with low correlation, therefore less susceptibility to market index declines.
The benefits of multifaceted diversification are not only from different ways to perform but also from a portfolio comprised of strategies that are less correlated. So that when a strategy underperforms, it’s less likely to occur at the same time as another strategy, which softens the volatility and drawdowns of the overall investment portfolio.
If you wish to discuss whether our multifaceted diversification approach might apply to your personal situation and investment accounts(s), please contact your investment representative.
Advertisement
Global Tactical Allocation Model
Our Global Tactical Allocation Model (GTAM) investment process combines macroeconomic analysis with valuation and momentum. ETFs (exchange traded funds) are used to gain exposure to 4 broad asset classes: Equities—major markets, emerging markets, sectors, styles, private equity; Fixed Income—bonds issued by governments, investment grade corporations, high-yield issuers, as well as mortgages, and bond indexes; Real Assets—real estate, infrastructure, renewable energy; and Commodities—Precious Metals or Oil. GTAM emphasizes ETFs that should outperform based on the macro environment, are selling at attractive absolute and relative valuations, possess good relative price momentum, and are at TRAC™ floors.
Current exposures are: Equities (83%); Real Asets (17%), Fixed Income (7%); and Commodities (none). Its current broad themes are international equities, software, consumer staples, insurance, healthcare, and forestry.
Quantitative Investment Models
Quantitative equity strategies commonly select securities based on systematic, rules-based decisions, using technology to uncover and exploit historical statistically significant anomalies. Our quantitative equity strategies employ proprietary and systematic processes that rank large cap stocks based on factors such as relative valuation, operating metrics (quality), financial strength, and price momentum. The two models noted below select approximately 30-40 holdings from the top-ranked stocks in the model’s respective universe. TRAC™ is utilized to optimize entry and exit points.
The Quantitative Global Value Model (QGVM) invests in large-cap equities from around the world. The U.S., Canada, and Japan currently represent the top 3 countries. The top 3 sectors are Financials (25%), Information Technology (20%), and Consumer Staples (15%). The companies held in QGVM currently have the following characteristics: median forward P/E of 17.1x, ROE and ROIC of 23% and 13%, respectively, and dividend yield of 1.8%.
Advertisement
The Quantitative Canadian Value Model (QCVM) restricts its universe to Canada’s S&P/TSX Composite. The top 3 sectors are currently Information Technology (22%), Materials (21%), and Financials (19%). The companies held in QCVM currently have the following characteristics: median forward P/E of 13.2x, ROE 15%, and dividend yield of 1.5%.
Income Model
Our high-yield investment strategy has an average current annual yield (income we receive as a percent of current market value of income securities held) of about 5.0%, and most of our holdings—corporate bonds/debentures, preferred shares, REITs, and high-yielding common shares—trade below our FMV estimates.
U.S. high-yield corporate bonds ((ICE BofA Index)) yield 6.9%. The spread versus government bonds appears too narrow, less than half the historical average of 5.5%. A widening to the average implies a yield closer to 10%. If the economy weakens and corporate delinquencies increase, spreads could expand even further. As such, we continue to carry cash in most of our income accounts, awaiting better entry points.
We sold Diversified Royalty (DIVRF) when it inflected down from a TRAC™ ceiling in line with our FMV estimate.
Advertisement
Investment Grade Income Model
Our investment grade strategy utilizes a systematic process to rank Canadian investment-grade rated corporate bonds based on their duration, yield, financial strength, and momentum.
Currently, positioning has emphasized longer-dated bonds—duration is 10.3 years, 4.7 years more than the S&P Canada Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index. The average yield-to-maturity is 4.8% versus 4.1% for the index.
Records Were Made to be Broken
Markets should rise over time, achieving ever-higher record levels. Earnings rise as the economy grows and assuming fair valuation levels are maintained, new highs ought to be expected. However, market rises don’t normally occur in an up-and-to-the-right straight line. Ebbs and flows are the norm, frequently sizeable ones.
When profit margins, optimism, and exposure to stocks are all at record-high levels, near-term record highs in the markets shouldn’t be anticipated, especially when valuations are so high and the prospect of a peak in the economic cycle is elevated.
Advertisement
The markets appear ready for a timeout.
Randall Abramson, CFA
References
In this letter, ROE, ROIC, dividend yield, yield, and yield to maturity, are calculated for the respective Model portfolio based on the holdings as at the date of this letter of an actual representative account managed in accordance with such Model. These figures are neither a measure of results achieved nor projected future performance. The Model’s holdings, and therefore ROE, ROIC, and yields, are subject to change at any time and may differ among accounts managed based on the same Model.
All investments involve risk, including loss of principal. This document provides information not intended to meet objectives or suitability requirements of any specific individual. This information is provided for educational or discussion purposes only and should not be considered investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell securities. The information contained herein has been drawn from sources which we believe to be reliable; however, its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. This report is not to be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any of the securities herein named. We may or may not continue to hold any of the securities mentioned. Generation PMCA Corp., its affiliates and/or their respective officers, directors, employees or shareholders may from time to time acquire, hold or sell securities named in this report. It should not be assumed that any of the securities transactions or holdings discussed were or will prove to be profitable, or that the investment decisions we make in the future will be profitable or will equal the investment performance of the securities discussed herein. E.&O.E.
KB Home (KBH) Q2 2026 Earnings Call June 23, 2026 5:00 PM EDT
Company Participants
Jill Peters – Senior Vice President of Investor Relations Jeffrey Mezger – Executive Chairman Rob McGibney – CEO, President & Director William Hollinger – Senior VP & Chief Accounting Officer
Conference Call Participants
Advertisement
John Lovallo – UBS Investment Bank, Research Division Matthew Bouley – Barclays Bank PLC, Research Division Stephen Kim – Evercore ISI Institutional Equities, Research Division Michael Dahl – RBC Capital Markets, Research Division Alan Ratner – Zelman & Associates LLC Rafe Jadrosich – BofA Securities, Research Division Paul Przybylski – Wolfe Research, LLC Jade Rahmani – Keefe, Bruyette, & Woods, Inc., Research Division Jay McCanless – Citizens JMP Securities, LLC, Research Division
Presentation
Operator
Advertisement
Good afternoon. My name is John and I’ll be your conference operator today. I would like to welcome everyone to the KB Home 2026 second quarter earnings conference call. All participant lines are in a listen-only mode. [Operator Instructions] This conference call is being recorded, and a replay will be accessible on the KB Home website until July 23rd, 2026.
I will now turn the call over to Jill Peters, Senior Vice President, Investor Relations. Thank you, Jill. You may begin.
Jill Peters Senior Vice President of Investor Relations
Advertisement
Thank you, John. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us today to review our results for the second quarter of fiscal 2026. On the call are Jeff Mezger, Executive Chairman, Rob McGibney, President and Chief Executive Officer, Bill Hollinger, Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer, and Thad Johnson, Senior Vice President and Treasurer.
During this call, items will be discussed that are considered forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are not guarantees of future results and the company does not undertake any obligation to update them. Due to
Clay Craft India is set to make its stock market debut on Wednesday with the grey market signalling a positive listing. The company’s shares were quoting at a grey market premium (GMP) of around 13%, indicating a potential listing gain of about Rs 26 over the issue price of Rs 203 per share, though GMP is an unofficial indicator and may not reflect the actual listing performance.
The Rs 110.11-crore NSE SME IPO was subscribed 103.06 times during the three-day bidding period, led by strong demand from non-institutional investors and qualified institutional buyers.
The NII portion was subscribed 153.95 times, while the QIB category was booked 119.19 times. The retail investors’ quota attracted 71.76 times subscription. Overall, the issue received bids for 37.18 crore shares against 36.08 lakh shares on offer.
The IPO was entirely a fresh issue of 54.24 lakh equity shares, with proceeds earmarked primarily for setting up an additional manufacturing facility at Manda, Rajasthan, besides general corporate purposes. Hem Securities was the book-running lead manager, while KFin Technologies acted as the registrar.
Advertisement
About the company
Founded in 1994, Clay Craft India manufactures bone china crockery and ceramic tableware used across households, hotels, restaurants and corporate gifting. Its portfolio includes dinnerware, mugs, platters, tea and coffee sets, and customised ceramic products for institutional customers. The company also caters to the HoReCa (hotel, restaurant and catering) segment and offers nearly 5,770 SKUs across multiple product categories. It has an extensive distribution network and employs more than 1,390 people.
Financial performance
Clay Craft reported healthy financial growth in FY26. Total income rose 20% year-on-year to Rs 184.57 crore, while profit after tax increased 30% to Rs 27.01 crore. EBITDA stood at Rs 41.96 crore, compared with Rs 35.39 crore in the previous year, while the company’s net worth improved to Rs 166.06 crore.
Live Events
Despite the strong subscription and positive grey market premium, investors will closely watch the stock’s listing performance amid broader sentiment in the SME segment, where post-listing returns have remained mixed in recent months. (Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of Economic Times)
The U.S. dollar extended gains to reach a fresh 13-month high against a basket of major currencies on Wednesday as investors sought shelter from a tech stock sell-off and positioned for Fed rate hikes.
A broad sell-off in technology and semiconductor shares has dragged global stocks lower as investors take profits on a long rally, sparking safe-haven demand for dollar and bonds.
Meanwhile, expectations of a U.S. rate hike continued to build with Federal Reserve officials sounding increasingly hawkish amid the strength of the U.S. economy. Markets are pricing in a 37% chance of a 25-basis-point hike at the July meeting, up from 8.5% a week ago, and 70% for September up from 29.1%, according to CME FedWatch.
The dollar index, which measures the greenback against a basket of currencies including the yen and the euro, climbed to a high of 101.44, the strongest level since May 13, 2025.
Advertisement
“The U.S. dollar is still the preferred safe-haven,” said Ray Attrill, head of FX strategy at National Australia Bank.
Live Events
“Obviously the momentum is on its side at the moment, but I think there is a lot priced in,” he said. “We’ll have to see a correction in risk sentiment, one that’s broader rather than just the tech sector, or the market further ratcheting up its expectations for hikes, before the dollar can go very much higher from here.” The euro last traded at $1.1375, near a one-year low. The British pound weakened slightly to $1.3199, after Bank of England policymaker Alan Taylor said an “extended hold” for interest rates was the right response to inflation pressure. The risk-sensitive Australian dollar was steady at $0.6918 ahead of the latest CPI reading later in the day. The New Zealand dollar weakened 0.05% to $0.5665, a fresh seven-month low.
Also supporting the safe-haven demand, the U.S. and Iran appeared to be at odds on some major aspects of their framework including nuclear issues and control of the Strait of Hormuz, raising questions about the viability of their fragile peace deal.
YEN LANGUISHES
The Japanese yen last traded at 161.57 after briefly weakening to a two-year low of 161.93 late on Monday as the greenback extended its gains. A break above 161.96 would leave the yen at its weakest level since 1986.
The latest round of verbal warnings from Japanese officials had done little to relieve sustained pressure on the currency, amid wide U.S.-Japan rate differentials and doubts about Tokyo’s commitment to intervention.
Advertisement
The Japanese yen could weaken to 165 per dollar if the Fed raises interest rates this year, former Bank of Japan policymaker Sayuri Shirai said.
Some Bank of Japan board members called for further interest rate hikes to push the central bank’s policy rate closer to levels deemed neutral to the economy, a summary of opinions at their June policy meeting showed on Wednesday.
Oil prices extended their decline on Wednesday, hovering near the four-month lows touched in the previous session, as signs emerged that more oil tankers stranded in the Gulf since the start of the Iran conflict are preparing to move through the Strait of Hormuz.
Crude oil price on June 24
Brent crude futures fell 37 cents, or 0.5%, to $76.71 a barrel, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude slipped 36 cents, or 0.5%, to $72.85 a barrel. Both benchmarks had already lost nearly 1% on Tuesday and hit their weakest levels since early March.
The market has been under pressure this week after Washington granted Tehran a 60-day sanctions waiver following initial peace talks, allowing Iran to continue selling oil. Prices have also been weighed down by easing hostilities in Lebanon.
On Tuesday, Oman and Iran agreed to continue discussions on the future administration of navigation through the Strait of Hormuz. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said any attempt by Iran to impose transit fees would be in violation of international law.
Advertisement
Live Events
However, questions remain over how durable the agreement will prove. U.S. President Donald Trump said on Tuesday that Iran had agreed to allow nuclear inspections “into infinity,” a claim Tehran disputed, saying no such concession had been made during negotiations.
What’s next for prices?
Despite the recent slide in oil prices, a complete reopening of Hormuz is expected to be a complex process. It will require careful coordination of vessel movements, restarting oil wells, repairing infrastructure, and agreeing on de-mining operations. Some shipowners also remain wary of operating conditions in the strait and the wider Persian Gulf. Analysts note that global oil inventories were depleted during the extended disruption of shipping through the Strait of Hormuz and will take time to rebuild. Stockpiles could continue falling before fresh Gulf supplies begin reaching international markets. Read more: NSE and Ambani are about to see if India’s retail crowd still has ‘buy the dip’ energy left Last month, Saudi Aramco Chief Executive Officer Amin Nasser cautioned that disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz could delay a return to stability in global oil markets until 2027. According to Nasser, prolonged interruptions could affect nearly 100 million barrels of oil supply each week. Saudi Aramco remains the world’s largest oil producer.
(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)
With Sir Keir Starmer standing down, Andy Burnham, the newly elected MP for Makerfield, looks all but certain to become the next prime minister. The bigger question now exercising Westminster, and the markets, is who he will install next door at No 11.
Many in the party believe Burnham will want his own chancellor rather than keep the current occupant, Rachel Reeves. Whoever takes the keys to the Treasury inherits a daunting in-tray: high debt, sluggish growth, an unfinished welfare reform programme, rising defence commitments and the economic fallout from the US-Israel war with Iran. It is a list that would test the most seasoned operator, and the choice matters well beyond Whitehall. Burnham’s arrival has already unsettled the business community, with eight in ten SME owners telling Business Matters they fear what his premiership would mean for their firm.
Here are the names in the frame for the second most powerful job in British politics, and what each could mean for your finances.
Wes Streeting
The bookmakers’ favourite is a former leadership contender, Wes Streeting. Having thrown his weight behind Burnham rather than running himself, the thinking is that the former health secretary could be rewarded with the number two job for his loyalty.
Not everyone is convinced that loyalty should be the deciding factor. Lord Jim O’Neill, the economist and cross-bench peer who has been advising Burnham, has warned against the approach. Without naming names, he told the BBC: “There are clearly some people pushing to be chancellor who feel they are owed it for their support.”
Advertisement
There is also a question of fit. Though Burnham may value Streeting’s backing, the two men’s instincts diverge, with Burnham seen as the more willing spender of the pair. Simon French, chief economist at the consultancy Panmure Liberum, describes Streeting as a “relatively market-friendly option” on the strength of his pro-growth language, but also flags a political risk: a chancellor who may one day want the top job himself. As for the suggestion that Streeting could be handed the role for his support rather than his ability, French is blunt: “Politics is what politics is. It’s a popularity contest.”
Ed Miliband
The bookies’ second favourite is Ed Miliband, the former Labour leader, who is politically closer to Burnham than Streeting is. Paul Johnson, former director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, sees that alignment as a strength. “You really don’t want people in Number 10 and Number 11 having very different views,” he says.
Whether a former Treasury adviser such as Miliband could win over the markets is more contested. Nick Macpherson, the former permanent secretary at the Treasury, told the Financial Times: “The key to gaining the confidence of the markets is to articulate, implement and deliver a coherent strategy. Miliband is one of the few cabinet members with the intellect, experience, and authority to do that.”
Others see an inflation risk. Critics blame his drive for net zero as energy secretary for the UK’s high energy prices relative to its peers, and analysts say that reputation, fair or not, could colour how the bond markets greet him. Sharon Graham, general secretary of the Unite union, has gone further, warning that a Miliband chancellorship would be a “noose around the neck” of job creation because of his opposition to new oil and gas drilling in the North Sea.
Advertisement
Pat McFadden
Seen as a longer shot than Streeting or Miliband, Pat McFadden is regarded by some as the most qualified candidate of the lot. He has held shadow Treasury briefs, served as a business minister in a previous Labour government and is the current work and pensions secretary. It is that last role that could prove decisive, giving him a head start on what many expect to be the next chancellor’s single biggest task: welfare reform.
Panmure Liberum’s French believes the markets may view McFadden as “the safest pair of hands” among the runners, reacting either positively or with a shrug if he were chosen. The catch is political. If Burnham is hunting for a clean break from the Starmer era, he is likely to look past so loyal a servant of the outgoing regime.
Yvette Cooper
Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper could be the compromise candidate. She brings years of government experience, having served as chief secretary to the Treasury under Gordon Brown, and sits somewhere between Miliband on one side and McFadden or Streeting on the other. Danni Hewson, head of financial analysis at AJ Bell, calls her a “middle of the road” option, but also “a bit more of an unknown”.
Rachel Reeves
There remains the possibility that the incumbent simply stays put. It looks unlikely, given how closely Reeves is tied to Starmer, but a few bookmakers are still taking bets on no change at the Treasury this year.
Advertisement
Lord O’Neill says his advice to Burnham has been to “figure out what his priorities are as prime minister before he picks a chancellor”. Follow that counsel and Reeves may yet survive, at least for now. Burnham has previously said he would stick to her fiscal rules, and the chancellor appeared in his Westminster photoshoot after he was sworn in as an MP on Monday. She was, tellingly, absent from Sir Keir’s resignation speech.
And the rest
Beyond the front-runners sits a longlist of wildcards. Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood, reported to be fiscally conservative but light on economic experience, is one. Former defence secretary John Healey, who quit very publicly over what he saw as inadequate defence spending, is another, though Paul Johnson cautions that appointing him would amount to a spending commitment in itself. “If I was Andy Burnham, I would not want to tie myself to that particular pillar that quickly,” he says.
Bookmakers and Westminster chatter also throw up Darren Jones, chief secretary to the prime minister, and Torsten Bell, the former chief executive of the Resolution Foundation, as outside bets.
For now, every name on the list wants the role. As Lord O’Neill puts it: “The ones whose names are in the papers are the ones who are putting themselves forward.”
Paul Jones
Harvard alumni and former New York Times journalist. Editor of Business Matters for over 15 years, the UKs largest business magazine. I am also head of Capital Business Media’s automotive division working for clients such as Red Bull Racing, Honda, Aston Martin and Infiniti.
SpaceX shares ended higher on Tuesday, snapping a three-day selloff that wiped out more than $600 billion from the Elon Musk-led rocket and satellite company’s market value.
The stock gained 1% to close at $156.11 after a choppy session that saw shares slip as much as 4.8%, then jump 7.1% before paring much of that advance by market close. The volatility came amid a broad-based slide in technology and other high-momentum stocks after a selloff in Korean chipmakers stoked fears about the rally in companies involved in artificial intelligence.
Still, the rebound helped reverse some of Monday’s 16% plunge that erased $400 billion in market value, marking the second-largest one-day loss on record. Only Nvidia Corp.’s roughly $590 billion plunge last year is bigger. SpaceX’s market capitalization was about $2 trillion at Tuesday’s close.
The stock moves are following a typical IPO pattern where “everybody was enjoying the hype and the mania,” said Louis Navellier of Navellier & Associates, adding that pressure on shares will build as lockups that keep insiders from selling expire and the company reports earnings figures. “It’s just a lesson that you have to follow fundamentals.”
Advertisement
Bloomberg
After pulling off a record $86 billion IPO in mid-June, SpaceX, officially named Space Exploration Technologies Corp., raised $25 billion of bonds in its debut offer Tuesday, making it the latest megacap technology company to tap investors for its AI expansion.
Live Events
The highest demand was for the bond deal’s least risky tranche, Bloomberg News reported. Separately, SpaceX also inked a multibillion-dollar agreement to provide computing resources to Reflection AI, an AI startup, the company said Monday. Also on Tuesday, Susquehanna Financial started coverage on the stock with a neutral rating and $170 price target. That target represents upside of nearly 9% from the stock’s Tuesday close.
Currently, six of the firms tracked by Bloomberg recommend buying the stock, while two including Susquehanna have hold-equivalent ratings. There is one sell rating. The average price target stands at nearly $227, suggesting return potential of about 45% off Tuesday’s close.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login