Editor’s Note: The following contains spoilers for ‘Supergirl.’

Unlike her cousin, Kara’s past trauma has left her cynical and resentful of this role of protector that’s been thrust upon her. For Gillespie, writer Ana Nogueira’s script, based on Tom King’s comic miniseries Supergirl: Woman of Tomorrow, was all about navigating this turbulent emotional journey, manifesting on screen as an action-packed western of sorts that allows Kara to embark on over half of the nearly two-hour runtime without ever donning a supersuit. And while it’s an emotional and unapologetic look at superheroes, Supergirl brings every ounce of DC’s more fantastical moments, from Jason Momoa as the larger-than-life Lobo to Kara’s best friend and superdog, Krypto.

In this exclusive interview with Collider’s Steve Weintraub, Gillespie discusses finding the tonal balance for Supergirl’s DCU debut, from changes made in the edit to determining how much Lobo and Superman screen time was necessary to push Kara’s story. He also talks about the inclusion of the Kryptonian sequence, how he brought his previous directorial style from I, Tonya, Cruella, and “even Lars and the Real Girl” to Supergirl, deleted scenes, finding the visual language for the film, and much more.

Craig Gillespie Explains Kara’s Difficult Decision at the End of ‘Supergirl’

“That was something James [Gunn] felt very strongly about.”

Image via Warner Bros.

COLLIDER: How did the film change along the way from when you first got the script to what people are going to see? Did it go through huge revisions, or was it pretty close to what you made?

CRAIG GILLESPIE: Amazingly, it’s pretty close. Honestly, one of the first things that I asked her to do was to prolong as long as possible her wearing the superhero outfit. In the original script, it was a lot earlier. I sort of designed it in a way, obviously, the ship gets stolen at the beginning, and the suit’s on it, so she gets to not have to wear it for a while, and that was important to me from an emotional standpoint. But the ending was always there, from the get-go, and I loved that that’s where they wanted to go with the film.

I love the ending. I’m watching the movie, and I’m not sure what is going to happen with Krem. Are they going to let him go? When she does that, honestly, I was all on board. I’m sure there was a lot of debate behind the scenes about whether or not she would do this, but I think it shows the difference between what she’s been through and what Kal-El has been through. Can you talk about that?

GILLESPIE: Absolutely. It was amazing because that was something James [Gunn] felt very strongly about, and it was in the script. There were conversations leading up to that day of, like, “Do we shoot a backup version?” And every time, it would come back, like, “Nope. Just go with that.” To have that kind of confidence that we wouldn’t be in a test screening and suddenly they’re like, “Ooh, yeah, we completely misread that,” was amazing. It was never debated. It was something that we stayed true to, and James was 100% behind it all the way through. Knowing that that was our North Star, and that they were willing to go that far with the film, gave you license for so many other things.

Also, if we go back a number of years, one of the things that really bothered a lot of people about Zack Snyder’s Man of Steel is Superman killing Zod, and I viewed it as times have changed, and Zod is going to keep killing people, so what do you do? That’s that version of Superman. But in James Gunn’s universe, Superman is that North Star of good who believes in redemption for everyone, and I think that the difference between Supergirl and Superman is a great thing that can be mined for story.

GILLESPIE: Absolutely. They come from such different backgrounds. She’s come from trauma. She’s come from loss. She’s come from seeing a lot of suffering, and never being discussed that this is going to be her role in life. She wants to stay there and die with her family, so to suddenly have this thrust upon her, she resents it. She’s resisting all of it. She doesn’t even know if she’s capable of it. Everything about it stayed true to that logic, and that was the emotional journey that she was on.

Why Kara Speaking Kryptonian in Her Flashback Was So Important

“We had this linguist who created five different languages for the film.”

I love the stuff on Krypton because you see another side of Krypton that you haven’t seen, but in the middle of the movie, you have this big scene that’s not in English. From the studio’s perspective and from your perspective, how long can you get away with this where it’s not going to be in English? Can you talk about what the debate was on how long you could speak in Kryptonian?

GILLESPIE: You just reminded me. That was not in the script. That was something I decided I wanted to do, which was to have them speak in a different language, almost for the authenticity of it, as strange as that sounds, because it’s a language we created. But to really make it feel grounded and like it’s of another world, in watching other films where this is done, that, to me, is where you really start to feel like it’s layered and complex and we are going throughout these different universes. I can’t tell you how many of the actors were like, “Are you sure we need to do this in another language?” [Laughs] It’s formidable, and some people are better at it than others. That was the scene that just blew me away.

We had this linguist who created five different languages for the film, and then that was off of my plate. I knew the actors had to go and work with the linguist, and work on this and learn this phonetically. I never really talked to Milly [Alcock] about it, and then we got to the scene with her and David [Krumholtz], and it’s an incredibly emotional scene. It’s four pages long. “Action,” and out of the gate, she just killed it. Absolutely killed it to the point that there were hairs standing up on my arms. She was so engaged and emotional and nuanced with it, and it’s a completely made-up language. I remember that day being like, “Wow, she’s such a master of her craft.” Between being able to do that, the humor, the drama, and the physicality that she’s doing for five and a half months for this, she was just killing it every day.

The stuff with her and David is great. And like I said, I liked seeing something on Krypton that I hadn’t seen before.

GILLESPIE: That scene and how much we broke them up, that was one scene that moved around a lot in the movie, in the edit.

I’m always fascinated by the editing room because there’s always so much that happens. With all Marvel and DC movies, they’re always plussing the movie to make it better and to learn from early screenings. How did this film change in the editing room once you started getting feedback and seeing what people were thinking?

GILLESPIE: In terms of plussing it, and the thing that surprised me in the edit, throughout the film, we kept trying things. I love to be spontaneous. I stay by the camera, I’m throwing out ideas and throwing out jokes and throwing out things to Milly as we’re shooting, and vice versa — she’s trying things. You like to have that arsenal in the edit room so we can figure out the tone of the movie, like, “How much humor do we want? No humor?”

That was the surprising part of it, because literally we have this ticking clock, and there were a lot of jokes that we ended up having to take out because it just felt like she’s not in a joking mood. She’s pissed off, and she’s on a mission, and every second counts. So every time she would stop to have a joke or be sarcastic about something, we really had to weigh up, “Is it true to her character and where she is emotionally right now,” and make those sacrifices. So there was a lot of leaning it out more and making it tighter in a way, and that was an interesting learning curve to the edit. She is almost like this missile on a mission throughout the film, and it got leaner and leaner in that sense.

Who was the one you showed it to who gave you a note that you had just missed somehow completely? It was oblivious to you, and you’re like, “How did I miss this?”

GILLESPIE: It’s a good question. The first person I always show it to is my wife. We’ve been together for 40 years, 34 years married. She’s very straight and blunt and honest. I know if I’m in good shape after she’s seen it. She saw the first rough. It’s hard to imagine, but as soon as the movie finishes, she was like, “How does she not reunite with the dog?” That scene we have in the tent was a pickup. We had the part at the end where Krypto was there running through the field and everything, but that interstitial scene there… As soon as the credits came, that was her first response. I was like, “Oh my God, you’re right. How did we not shoot that?” So there you go. That was one thing.

[Laughs] I’ve spoken to so many filmmakers, and there’s always something that you miss. By the way, it was everyone on set. Every single person. It’s not just you.

GILLESPIE: Yeah, nobody was like, “Should we show him getting the anecdote?” [Laughs]

The whole movie is about saving a dog, but we’re not going to show the reuniting because that’s not important.

GILLESPIE: We had them reuniting in the field, but it just wasn’t the same.

Craig Gillsepie Explains Superman’s Small but Important Role in ‘Supergirl’

Superman and Supergirl will return in James Gunn’s ‘Man of Tomorrow.’

Image via DC Studios

Advertisement

Superman is in the movie, but he’s a minor part. I would imagine there’s a lot of debate from the studio, like, “How much do we want Superman in the movie? Where is he going to be in the movie?” Because I’m a huge Superman fan, I want to see him in the movie, but it’s not a Superman movie.

GILLESPIE: It ended up being a great, organic thing. There was that discussion as we were putting him in the film because that was something that wasn’t in the initial script, was the conversation when she’s brushing her teeth at the beginning of the film. It was like, “Do we do a flashback here? Do we do this or that?” And I really liked the idea that he was calling here on a video phone, and keeping it in her space and in her environment, and not going to him on his planet, and saving those moments where they were actually physically together for later in the film.

So that was something that we sort of mapped out throughout the movie. And again, you don’t need a lot. A little goes a long way. So there are sort of these emotional touchstones along the way where she is that worked beautifully as these signposts, in terms of their relationship. So that was the main goal of Superman in this film.

I love the stuff with her in him when she has returned. She goes through so much. Where she starts at the beginning and where she is at the end, we see her journey, and we understand at the beginning why she is the way she is, and we understand at the end why she is the way she is. For fans, there’s something so great about seeing the two of them together, both on the same page. Can you talk about filming that stuff?

GILLESPIE: I sometimes like to give myself options, so I actually shot that scene with David [Corenswet] in the superhero outfit and then David as Clark Kent, trying to do a surprise birthday for her. Very quickly, when we cut that together, to your point, you wanted to see the two superheroes together in their outfits. It was abundantly clear. And it is a magically understated moment between them, which I love.

She’s not “cured.” She’s not at peace, necessarily, but she’s definitely come to terms with her responsibilities. I think it’s still going to be a journey to her, but that’s what’s exciting about it. You do see she’s gotten a darker place, and part of that whole journey was that she was very much running away from it, and she was forced to deal with it, obviously, through Krypto, but also Eve [Ridley], as a character, who was almost a mirror to the trauma that she’d been through in a different kind of way, a very drastic trauma. So when she starts trying to preach to her how to deal with that, she realizes she’s not doing that, and that was a very interesting dynamic to have for the two of them.

‘Supergirl’s Lobo Was Always Going To Be Jason Momoa

“Fifteen years he’s been championing it.”

Image via DC

Advertisement

I definitely have to bring up Lobo. Was it always going to be Lobo, or did you guys discuss another character?

GILLESPIE: [Laughs] Jason [Momoa] has wanted to do this role forever, and he’s perfect for it. Fifteen years he’s been championing it, I think, so pretty much out of the gate, it was like, “Yeah, we’re going to have Jason for Lobo,” and he was thrilled with it.

Then, it was about, “Alright, so there have been decades of comics with Lobo. Where are we zeroing in? Which version of Lobo will we do?” We very quickly gravitated towards the ‘90s and all the outfits and how close we stayed. Because you’ve seen in the comic book world, they’ve gone a long way away from, sometimes, where comic books are with their outfits, but we really wanted to stay true to a version of Lobo, and Jason did too. He had a very strong point of view on that, as well.

When he came on the set, it was, in the best way, this sort of injection of adrenaline, because there’s a certain energy to Milly’s performance, which is exactly what it should be. She’s an outsider, and she’s quieter, and she’s subversive and sort of sarcastic, but then Lobo comes in, and he’s like a tornado. He literally comes out of a fireball in that scene. He’s so gregarious and unfiltered in the best way, and to see those two clash, it was always some of the funnest scenes to shoot.

Was it always going to be Lobo hungover in a bar, the way you introduce him? I do like how he’s in the bar, and Milly’s like, “Don’t look at him. Don’t talk to him. Don’t engage this man.”

GILLESPIE: Yes. It was always written that way. And Jason, of course, in the best way, once he gets up to the bartenders, that was primarily the script, but he’s improvising in places, and I do love when actors get to improvise. It’s always something that I get excited about. So, to see the way that they can react to each other, because that’s acting to me, is the reaction, to see when they can play and to have that banter, that’s when it really comes alive, and Jason was very game with that.

When you think back on the Lobo stuff when you were filming, is there a scene or a moment with Milly and Jason that, when you think back, you always zero in on?

GILLESPIE: It’s in the bar. It’s literally him coming up and asking about her, and then her slinging under and doing the Valley Girl impersonation. And then when he’s like, “Stop, you’re giving me a headache.” I think that was an improvisation from Jason.

Once Jason agreed to do Lobo and he’s in the movie, I’m sure there’s debate between how much it’s going to be a cameo and how much we want Lobo to be in the movie. Where is the line? Because for a lot of men, that’s what they want to see. I love that it’s two women leading this movie, but being honest, a lot of men go to see superhero movies, and they want to see Jason as Lobo or Superman, and you have to balance, “How much do we want to have?”

GILLESPIE: It is a dance, and it’s absolutely that balance. Obviously, the priority is that this is Supergirl’s film, so it’s like, how much can we get away with? There was even to the point of, in that final action sequence, the balance of, like, a few less explosions and carnage on the Lobo side, in which case he comes in and just causes mayhem. So, it was that dance of that balance, of when do we get back to then Milly taking over? And you want to leave the audience wanting a little more. That’s always the best part, too. You don’t want to overdo it. You don’t want to overcook it.

No matter how much money you have and no matter what your schedule is, there are always sequences that the line producer or someone will say, “Are you sure we need this?” What was something that you were fighting for, even against the budget and schedule?

GILLESPIE: Candidly, it was shooting in Iceland. As much as there’s stuff that’s done on stage, we got to go to Iceland and shoot some sequences there, and it sets the look for the whole third act. What I love about that, where she lands and walks out and collapses, and Eve coming out of the cave and going down to the water, is that it holds the visual effects companies beholden to make it as authentic as what we’ve already shot. It’s great for them that they’ve now got the canvas that they have to replicate, in terms of lighting and the clouds. So it just makes it all feel so much more authentic, and that was something that I really threw down my sword on at one point.

I’ve thankfully been to Iceland before, and it is really like visiting another planet. The actual location, there’s no set deck, it’s just another planet.

GILLESPIE: Literally, when she comes out of that cave and walks down to that lake, that’s all in camera.

I say the same thing about Malta. It’s like stepping back in time. It’s incredible. Anyway, what is a tiny background detail, costume choice, or prop that you hope fans obsess over?

GILLESPIE: [Laughs] The pooping alien.

That’s a great gag.

GILLESPIE: Also, Alan Tudyk on the space bus.

Of course.

GILLESPIE: That was a really fun surprise.

It was. Once you hear his voice, you know exactly who it is. He’s okay. He’s talented.

GILLESPIE: He might have a future.

Exactly. So you’ve mentioned the intense debate over where to place Kara’s single allowed PG-13 F-bomb. Without spoiling the exact moment, what was the funniest or most absurd scene where you considered using it but ultimately had to say, “Let’s save it?”

GILLESPIE: It was probably the arm wrestling scene. She had a good F-bomb in there.

Was there a lot of debate on where you wanted to place it?

GILLESPIE: It’s also, again, to that point that we were talking about with her being locked into getting to save Krypto; that was some of the jokes that we’d have to sacrifice. It’s a fun moment, but again, maybe she’s having too much fun in the moment. Ultimately, that scene was longer, the whole arm wrestling part of that, and then we ended where she just snaps it. She’s just moving forward, like she’s propelling the plot. That was a sort of discovery in the edit.

It’s also Harrison Ford just shooting the dude in Raiders.

GILLESPIE: Exactly.

‘Supergirl’s Deleted Scenes Expand on Eve’s Backstory

“There’s like 10 minutes of stuff that is not in the movie.”

Via. DC Studios, Warner Bros.

It’s great when someone super powerful doesn’t play around. It’s “Let’s just move on.” You’ve obviously finished the movie, and eventually this will be out on home video. Let’s not pretend it won’t be. Have you actually prepared a bunch of deleted scenes, or are there things you’re going to give to the fans down the road?

GILLESPIE: Yes, we’re working on that. The amount of scenes is what we’re trying to figure out. But yeah, there’s a few.

Is it something where you would think about an extended cut, or is it always the theatrical cut with deleted scenes?

GILLESPIE: We’ve tightened it, so there’s like 10 minutes of stuff that is not in the movie, but it’s all part of the same scene, so to speak. So, I’d say some of the other things. There’s a scene we’re thinking about where we get to see Eve’s family. We do a whole section of that that used to be the front of the film.

So it’s basically more with the family before Krem, and everyone shows up.

GILLESPIE: Yeah, and ultimately, we felt we didn’t necessarily need that. It’s those small sacrifices that you make to propel the movie on.

Totally. That’s why I love physical media. But some directors I’ve spoken to do not like showing deleted scenes, and others are selective with what they’re willing to show. It’s the balance.

GILLESPIE: It is a balance. Then there are the alternate scenes, as well. Is that good or bad? So, we haven’t quite figured out the list yet. Right now we’re just in the middle of getting the film out.

Judd Apatow has done a lot of alt scenes where they’ll show multiple versions with different jokes and stuff.

GILLESPIE: I enjoy those scenes because you sort of put your own director’s hat on, like, “Would I put that in, not put that in?”

100%. It’s interesting because in a lot of movies, filmmakers will do that, but with superhero movies from Marvel and DC, they tend not to do that. It’s very meticulous what the studio will allow out. It’s a little different.

GILLESPIE: Good to know. [Laughs]

Good luck, because I would love for you to do this. I love that home video stuff. There are five original alien languages created for this film. Did you ever catch Milly or the cast cursing at you in Kryptonian when a scene took too many takes?

GILLESPIE: [Laughs] I’m betting they were. Here’s my flaw as a director: “Let’s do one more.” Milly would be like, “It’s never just one more.” But I knew she was saying, “Let’s go again!”

You’ve directed ice skaters, fashion villains, hedge fund chaos, and now Kryptonians. Which one has the most dangerous set of fans?

GILLESPIE: I would probably say the hedge fund guys. There are some pretty aggressive lawyers.

They also have way too much money.

GILLESPIE: Yeah. That’s a scarier proposition.

You’ve directed complicated, messy, funny characters in movies like I, Tonya and Cruella. What made Kara Zor-El feel like a Craig Gillespie character?

GILLESPIE: She’s so similar in so many ways to characters I’ve done in the past, whether it’s I, Tonya, Cruella, or even Lars and the Real Girl with Ryan [Gosling]. They’re these outsiders, or these misfits, who have often been through some kind of trauma and are trying to find their way and find their own identity. Ultimately, their imperfections are what make them so relatable. I love to go on that journey and find out what makes them beautiful.

How Craig Gillespie Found a Unique Directorial Voice for ‘Supergirl’

Gillespie has previously worked on ‘I, Tonya’ and ‘Cruella.’

Image via Warner Bros. Pictures

What’s the most Craig Gillespie scene in the film?

GILLESPIE: It’s probably her drinking in the bar at the start. [Laughs] It’s funny, I love being able to meet her character that way. It’s just not what you expect of a superhero. She’s running away from all of her responsibilities; she wants to hide, she’s got nobody other than Krypto, and we see all of that happening in a singular scene. Then, against her better judgment, she can’t help but help someone. Having all that wrapped up in one scene as an opening was really amazing.

James Gunn has spoken extensively about creating a DC universe with distinct directorial voices. What is the specific thematic boundary you pushed in this film that you think would never have been allowed in a traditional, formulaic studio superhero movie?

GILLESPIE: I think it is that unapologetic nature of this character. To see, particularly, a female superhero that’s so flawed and almost self-destructive in a way, with her going to the red planets and trying to escape with alcohol, to be able to start there, but have a female character as a superhero that’s not sexualized, that can just look like she’s rolled out of bed in rumpled clothes, and give basically zero fucks. All of that stuff was incredibly exciting for me to be able to present, like a really grounded, fully formed character that is not perfect and is more beautiful because of that, and more relatable, I think, for the audience.

Also completely different from Superman. We don’t want two of the same character. There has to be a difference.

GILLESPIE: I know. That was wonderful to have that sort of friction and juxtaposition. I do love that line where she’s explaining it upstairs in the bedroom to Eve, and she’s like, “Oh, he’s a nerd.” She’s like, “He sees the good in people, and I see the truth.” They have such a different perspective on life.

You find out you’re going to do this project. What is it like as a director, because you must have known a little bit about DC, but I don’t think you knew everything. What is it like once you get to the gig in terms of the preparation? How much are you reading? How much are you diving deep on every character to understand the lore, and how much is it like, “I have so much to do. I can only read so much, so what do I really need to know?”

GILLESPIE: The amazing thing is Tom King’s version of Supergirl, Woman of Tomorrow, is so different than what’s come before it. So having that and then Ana [Nogueira]’s script, that was my North Star, and I started there. I deliberately stayed away from everything else. I think the trick is, too, you can’t second-guess people. You’ve got to sort of stay true to yourself, and so I put together a deck of what I wanted to do. If they didn’t want to do that, no harm, no foul. So I had 120 images; I came in, it was gritty, it was quite dark. She was very rough around the edges as a character. I pushed to not have her be in her superhero outfit until late in the movie. All of these things that excited me about it.

I had the one meeting with James, and in that meeting, I said to him as we were talking, “How much do you want this to be in your universe?” Right out of the gate, he’s like, “We’re taking each one as its own graphic novel, as distinctive as a graphic novel is with its illustrator and writer. This is your version.” And because most of this movie happens off-planet, I had to invent it all, which was incredibly exciting and ultimately daunting as hell. I mean, there are like 50 aliens on that bus. All the wardrobe, the languages, every planet, the different spaceships. I’d turn around and be like, “Give her a coffee cup,” and they’d be like, “Which planet is it from?” It’s not a coffee cup from Earth. You can’t just grab things. So that part was daunting, but the freedom we had to do all of that was kind of amazing.

Everyone loves George Lucas and Star Wars, but a lot of people forget that he was doing all that in ‘75, ‘76, designing all these aliens, all the tech. People just forget how genius it was, what he accomplished back then.

GILLESPIE: Honestly, to do a movie now that’s just set on Earth… Like 70% of our production was taken up with that development — all these aliens, all the looks, all the languages. I think they’re on seven different planets. The transportation and the backstory of that. Krypton, we’re reinventing that in its own way. So, that was an enormous undertaking, just every aspect of that, between wardrobe, production design, the cinematography. We were trying to make it look different in each place.

It’s funny you mentioned cinematography because that was my next question. How did you end up with Rob Hardy, and what were those initial conversations like in terms of telling him what you wanted to accomplish and working together on the visual aesthetic of what you wanted to put on screen?

GILLESPIE: I love his work. He has such a range, from Ex Machina to Mission: Impossible. I had my regular DP, who sadly was not available, who I did Cruella and I, Tonya with, Nicolas Karakatsanis, so I went to Rob, and I showed him the visual deck that I had. We started with that. One of the first questions was, “How gritty can we go?” And I was like, “I think we can go as gritty as necessary. We don’t have to shy away from that. We’ve been given that opportunity, and I want to lean into running with it.”

He quickly latched onto some of the late ‘80s, like Thelma & Louise was sort of a big inspiration for the bar scenes with the neon. There was a lot of color going on in that period, and so we looked at that as a reference and faced a lot of practicals that had those colors and influence, like in those bar settings. Same with the space bus. There was a lot of color going into those sections, and we really tried to differentiate each emotional space. By the time we get to Bilquis, it’s pretty grim in terms of color. There’s a lack of color there on that planet, and we talked our way through all of that.

The other thing, which I love with Rob Hardy, in terms of the grittiness of it, is that he really insisted on a lot of that action sequence shooting outside, even though there would be big blue screen sections to it, up on the decks — we built that whole deck — but he loves the imperfection of that, and that you have to chase the light. There are things that aren’t perfect, whereas if you’re on stage, everything looks perfect all the time. So, it’s constantly trying to give it that grit.

You’ve said that the camera language shifts with Kara’s emotional state. What emotion was the most fun to translate visually?

GILLESPIE: I actually did really enjoy the fight on Bilquis. The first one was in the bar, and we said, “Let’s make this Eve’s perspective, because we’re going to see a lot of action through the film.” So that was fun to see with her and to see the wonder of it. The second one, she’s angry, and to have her be angry with a superpower and also poison, so she’s not completely in control of her faculties, to see a superhero on the edge that might lose it and go too far was a really fun dynamic to have in that sequence. But then, I love the final sequence of the big wraparound because it’s poetic. She’s fully embraced her character, and you see the awe from Eve. So, I love how they’re all so different, honestly.

One thing people don’t realize is that when you’re filming an action set piece, that can eat up a lot of time in your schedule, depending on what you’re trying to accomplish. Hypothetically, let’s say you had 80 days. You have to calculate, “Where and when do I want to deploy my additional resources in my schedule?” Can you talk about working with everyone to figure out, “Where do we want to spend extra time?”

GILLESPIE: It’s amazing. It’s kind of incredibly surprising how much those action sequences take up. I like to do it myself. We don’t have a second unit director to do the action because I’m a little too specific about what I want and a bit too much in control, I guess.

You like to micromanage? What?

GILLESPIE: As a director? [Laughs] So, we shot all of those sequences, so that middle sequence probably ultimately ended up being maybe six weeks of our shoot. And then you get to do these dialogue scenes where Lobo in the bar is one day. It’s such an impactful scene, and it’s just the kind of stuff that people love. But the flip side of that is our actors are so good at their craft, and so dialed in, that we can do that in a day. Then you might do three big action set pieces in a day, which is 12 seconds of the movie. It’s such a crazy imbalance, but it all is important. Obviously, the character stuff is the stuff that you connect to and resonate with, so you’ve got to make sure you have space for that. There is that dance, but when you break it down, the amount of time that you have two people talking in a room, percentage-wise, is kind of shocking.

Every movie is going to have big action set pieces. The thing that I visually really remember is the two of them in the apartment talking after she’s back. That scene means a lot.

GILLESPIE: I love that scene. Again, that scene is probably two-thirds of a day. It didn’t need to be more. Milly is so good. She sat down, and that was her body language out of the gate, tucked in that corner, not wanting to talk, resisting, trying to keep her space from Eve. Then it was the blocking on Eve, when she’s sitting, and then she lays down. Once you figure out that blocking, and then you let them go, she didn’t do a bad take. That’s the amazing thing. You get to see this beautiful performance, and we get to do eight or nine takes, and we have it. You kind of want to step away before you wear it out, in a weird way.

Your filmography frequently explores characters who build emotional walls to cope with isolation or trauma. How did you approach Kara’s specific flavor of grief, the burden of remembering a dead world that her famous cousin never knew?

GILLESPIE: It’s emotional walls, and often, too, humor is used to deflect, which is something that I think is often a tool of humor. It gets overlooked. So she might make a joke or dismiss something, or throw a line away. That’s her way of deflecting the moment. It’s just a very natural human trait, and I think it’s something that people identify very quickly with and can relate to. It’s so much more interesting than somebody who doesn’t have things to explore and work out within their own selves.

Supergirl has Krypto, Lobo, alien worlds, revenge, and comedy. What was the hardest tonal ingredient to balance?

GILLESPIE: It was the tone. It was exactly that. Like I said before, I’m getting a bunch of different jokes, knowing in the edit we’re going to have to sacrifice some of those jokes. Interestingly, that was the thing we lost more than I expected. There was a great scene between her and the alien that’s drooling on her shoulder on the space bus. It’s so much fun, but we were kind of like, “We kind of don’t want her wasting her time with him.” So, things like that, that I thought would be just fun to sit in for a while, we had to release.

Supergirl is in theaters now.

Advertisement

Release Date

Advertisement

June 26, 2026

Runtime

108 minutes

Advertisement

Writers

Ana Nogueira

Producers

Advertisement

James Gunn, Lars P. Winther, Nigel Gostelow, Peter Safran

Advertisement

• 
• 

Advertisement

Advertisement

Overnight success Maxton Hall is coming back for a third — and final — season, but is every cast member returning?

The German-language TV drama, which premiered in May 2024, introduced viewers to an unlikely enemies-to-lovers romance between private school classmates Ruby Bell (Harriet Herbig-Matten) and James Beaufort (Damian Hardung). While attending their prestigious U.K. school, scholarship recipient Ruby unwittingly witnessed a secret that put her on the radar of the wealthy James.

Based on Mona Kasten’s book series, Maxton Hall quickly found record-breaking success, becoming the most-watched non-U.S. title during its first week on Prime Video. It was later renewed for a second — and then a third — season.

Prime Video confirmed that the final season would premiere in December 2026. Before its return, Hardung spoke exclusively to Us Weekly about the vision for the final chapter.

Related: See ‘Maxton Hall‘ Costars Harriet and Damian‘s Sweetest Friendship Moments

Damian Hardung and Harriet Herbig-Matten became close friends while playing love interests — James and Ruby — on Maxton Hall. The Prime Video series, which debuted in May 2024, is based on Mona Kasten‘s Save You book series. The six-part German-language TV drama introduced viewers to an unlikely enemies to lovers romance between private school […]

“[Them going into season 3 in a better place as a couple] would be my hope for them. They’ve been through so much. After all this, what else can there be that?” Hardung noted in November 2025. “That’s why the third book [which inspires season 3] is called Save Us. Because it’s about the two of them actually being together and fighting against the outer world.”

Keep scrolling to see which Maxton Hall stars are coming back for season 3 — and which aren’t:

Harriet Herbig-Matten

Herbig-Matten is reprising the role of Ruby in season 3.

Damian Hardung

Hardung was also filming scenes for season 3, which will wrap up Ruby and James’ love story.

Sonja Weißer

James’ sister, Lydia, is expected to be a major player in the final chapter.

Fedja van Huêt

Maxton Hall wouldn’t be what it is without James and Lydia’s father stirring up trouble in season 3.

Related: TV Shows Ending in 2026: See the Complete List

From The Bear to Outlander to Outer Banks, TV fans are gearing up to say goodbye to their favorite shows in 2026. Outer Banks, which debuted in 2020, follows the conflict between two groups of teenagers in a coastal North Carolina town. The social divide is introduced with the wealthy residents (a.k.a. the Kooks) and […]

Advertisement

Justus Riesner

Alistair is due to return to the show in season 3.

Thank You!

You have successfully subscribed.

Runa Greiner

Ruby’s family will continue to be explored in season 3 as Greiner returns to the show.

Martin Neuhaus

Ruby and Ember’s father will also likely be in season 3.

Julia-Maria Köhler

After Köhler originated the role of Ruby and Ember’s mother, Gina Henkel took over starting in season 2.

There is no hard-and-fast rule that specifies the number of seasons a show needs in order to be considered “great.” While greatness is often associated with shows that have expanded across many years, it’s rare to find consistency within anything that has expanded for far too long. There are very few shows in which every single season is a masterpiece, and there are no episodes that missed the mark. Brevity can be a good thing, especially for shows that have a tight and specific story focus in mind.

The unfortunate reality is that there are many great shows that are canceled before their times, as executives tend to make decisions based on ratings, and not critical acclaim. Although it is disappointing when a promising series has its legs cut off before it has the ability to reach its potential, that doesn’t mean that it isn’t worth revisiting and celebrating.

10

‘Winning Time: The Rise of the Lakers Dynasty’ (2022–2023)

Image via HBO Entertainment

Winning Time: The Rise of the Lakers Dynasty was one of the best sports shows ever made by HBO because it dramatized some of the most important events in NBA history. The success of the Los Angeles Lakers seemed like a miracle in the 1980s, but the series co-created by Adam McKay delved into the clashing personalities that caused its rise to prominence to be so unpredictable.

Winning Time: The Rise of the Los Angeles Lakers was filled with excellent performances, including an eccentric portrayal of Jerry Buss by John C. Reilly and a loaded depiction of Pat Riley by Adrien Brody, who was in the midst of his comeback. Winning Time: Rise of the Lakers Dynasty contains some of the best basketball ever depicted on a dramatized show, but it also had the business intrigue and cultural discourse needed to engage non-NBA fans.

9

‘Pushing Daisies’ (2007–2009)

Image via ABC

Pushing Daisies is a fun twist on the traditional procedural drama that has no shortage of comedy involved, as well as an interesting perspective on supernatural powers. While the protagonist Ned (Lee Pace) has the power to communicate with the recently departed, he can only do so for 60 seconds, and often risks putting the people he loves in danger. It’s a show that deals with wounded, challenged characters, but often puts them in humorous situations.

Pushing Daisies is a colorful, yet well-thought-out mystery series that has a multitude of talented guest stars and surprisingly profound depictions of loss, love, and the search for meaning. Although the show was unfortunately axed before it got the chance to put up a plethora of episodes, it did mark a promising start for showrunner Bryan Fuller, who would gain even more acclaim when he developed Hannibal for NBC.

8

‘Vice Principals’ (2016–2017)

Image via HBO

Vice Principals is another comedy masterpiece from Danny McBride and Jody Hill, who have made some of the funniest HBO shows of all time. Unlike the other two shows that they made for the network, Vice Principals was always designed to be a two-season event with a strict ending. The series is focused on two narcissistic vice principals, played by McBride and his future The Righteous Gemstones co-star Walton Goggins, who attempt to conspire their way to the top after they are both passed over for a promotion.

Vice Principals needed to be only two seasons, because the humor got so dark and cruel that it could have been taxing after too long. However, McBride is a genius when it comes to depicting flawed characters, and Vice Principals does a great job at showing audiences that they should be laughing at the characters, and not with them.

7

‘The Knick’ (2014–2015)

Image via Cinemax

The Knick is a show that unfortunately fizzled out because of its network, as it debuted on Cinemax before it was ever known for doing anything prestigious. Created by Steven Soderbergh, the series starred Clive Owen as a brilliant, yet irksome doctor in the early 20th century who tries to manage a high-profile medical laboratory whilst battling a severe addiction to cocaine. The series also marked an early role for Eve Hewson before her breakthrough with Disclosure Day.

The Knick is impressive with its attention to detail and has been cited by medical professionals as being the most accurate show about its subject matter. Although the series gave a tremendous amount of insight into how emerging medical sciences were handled within this period in time, it’s also a sharp exploration of a different time in American history in which every level of infrastructure was subjected to biases and corruption.

6

‘Tokyo Vice’ (2022–2024)

Image via HBO Max

Tokyo Vice was a brilliant noir series based on the memoir of the same name by Jake Adelstein, who became the first American journalist to get a serious job at the most powerful news publication in all of Tokyo. Adelstein is played by Ansel Elgort, and the series shows how he becomes allies with a powerful cop (Ken Watanabe) as they investigate cases of corruption linked to the Japanese mafia.

Tokyo Vice is a spiritual constitution of everything that Michael Mann has done, as the legendary filmmaker produced the series and also directed the pilot episode. Tokyo Vice may have been canceled far too soon, but the two seasons that exist are among the most polished, technically advanced, and thematically radical pieces of filmmaking to ever be created in the streaming era. It should be a must-watch for all crime buffs.

5

‘Flight of the Conchords’ (2007–2009)

Image via HBO

Advertisement

Flight of the Conchords is one of the funniest and most underrated HBO shows, and one that continued the network’s tradition of making cheeky comedies that constantly broke the fourth wall. As was the case with Curb Your Enthusiasm, Flight of the Conchords has its two stars playing fictionalized versions of themselves in a series that parodies what their daily lives look like.

Jemaine Clement and Bret McKenzie star as the real members of a New Zealand folk duo who try to make it in America, where they experience all sorts of career setbacks, embarrassments, and failed gigs. While it’s a treat for those who loved the band of the same name, as Clement and McKenzie have actually toured as “Flight of the Conchords,” the show has something to say for anyone who has pursued an artistic career in a challenging field.

4

‘Rome’ (2005–2006)

Image via HBO

Advertisement

Rome was one of the earliest examples of what HBO could do with a significant budget when tasked with recreating a rich mythology, and it laid the groundwork for what the network would do with Game of Thrones. Although the history of the Roman Empire is vast and complicated, Rome found a clever way of retelling the most important events; the first season was largely focused on the rise and fall of Julius Caesar (Ciaran Hinds), and the second showed the aftermath as it resulted in an alliance with Egypt.

Rome was able to explore the perspective of all different classes within the Roman era, with Ray Stevenson giving the best performance of his career as a former prisoner who becomes a noble warrior. Although it’s disappointing to think of what Rome could have accomplished had it continued, the two seasons that did air are too perfect for any HBO fan to miss out on.

3

‘The Rehearsal’ (2022–2025)

Image via HBO

Advertisement

The Rehearsal is the most radical and creative enterprise that Nathan Fielder has ever embarked upon, which is saying something when considering how many risks that he has taken throughout his career. What genre The Rehearsal actually belongs to is even up for debate; while it may seem framed like an investigative documentary or reality show, The Rehearsal develops into a psychological thriller as Fielder pries deeper into human nature and attempts to unpack the inherently performative components of human interaction.

The Rehearsal is absurdist without being parodical, and is able to be genuinely thought-provoking whilst still being highly entertaining. Although there have been rumors about what a third season might look like, it is very hard to imagine Fielder topping the ending of Season 2, in which he developed actual research that could change the airline industry for good.

2

‘Andor’ (2022–2025)

Image via Lucasfilm

Advertisement

Andor is the best piece of Star Wars storytelling since Return of the Jedi and one of the most ambitious, satisfying works of drama in the 21st century. Although it is technically a prequel to Rogue One: A Star Wars Story, Andor gets into the heart of how the Rebel Alliance emerged from a group of warring resistance groups, becoming a powerful force that resisted the Galactic Empire when it was willing to commit genocide upon innocent planets.

Andor offered an opportunity for Diego Luna to flesh out his role after not being given much to do in the previous film, but it also featured many new characters that instantly became some of the best in the entire Star Wars universe. Stellan Skarsgård was a standout as Luthen Rael, a spymaster who secretly connects defiant members of the Imperial Senate with rebel fighters.

1

‘Mindhunter’ (2017–2019)

Image via Patrick Harbron / ©Netflix / courtesy Everett Collection

Advertisement

Mindhunter is one of the most thoughtful and insightful explorations of criminal behavior ever created, and it shouldn’t come as a surprise when considering that showrunner David Fincher has directed some of the best serial killer films of all-time. Loosely based on the autobiography of the former FBI profiler John Douglas, Mindhunter stars Jonathan Groff as Holden Ford, a brilliant field agent who develops a research initiative into unpacking the psychology of killers and criminals.

Mindhunter weaves in different true stories and depicts several real killers, but also focuses on the mental effects that these disturbing investigations have on both Ford and his partner Bill Tench (Holy McCallany). Mindhunter may have ultimately been too niche and expensive for Netflix to renew for a third season on the budget that Fincher had been asking for, but that doesn’t make it any less of a masterpiece.

Advertisement

Mindhunter

Advertisement

Release Date

2017 – 2019

Advertisement

Network

Netflix

Showrunner

Advertisement

Joe Penhall

Directors

David Fincher, Carl Franklin, Andrew Dominik, Andrew Douglas, Asif Kapadia, Tobias Lindholm

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Of all the surprises at this year’s Academy Awards, Timothée Chalamet missing out on the Best Actor prize for his performance in the sports drama Marty Supreme was one of the most high-profile. Just weeks before the ceremony, the Call Me By Your Name star was the bookies’ favorite, only for some controversial, headline-grabbing comments to put his chances under scrutiny. Then, on the night, the victory went the way of Michael B. Jordan for his performance in Ryan Coogler’s Sinners, with the rest of the nominees including Ethan Hawke for his leading role in Richard Linklater‘s Blue Moon, Wagner Moura for his starring performance in The Secret Agent, and Leonardo DiCaprio for Paul Thomas Anderson’s One Battle After Another.

After missing out on the prize in the past two years, will Chalamet finally win gold in 2027? There’s a chance he returns as a nominee, with the actor about to headline one of the year’s biggest films. Released on December 18, the same day as Avengers: Doomsday, Dune: Part Three will cap off Denis Villeneuve‘s acclaimed adaptation of Frank Herbert‘s Dune novels, with Chalamet returning as the head of House Atreides. Chalamet stars in the film alongside an eye-catching cast, which also includes Zendaya, Florence Pugh, Rebecca Ferguson, Josh Brolin, Javier Bardem, Anya Taylor-Joy, and more. Villeneuve is directing once more from a script he co-wrote with Brian K. Vaughan.

As excitement continues to build for this space opera that ranks as the most exciting adaptation of 2026, huge quantities of tickets are being sold, even selling out its initial release of limited IMAX 70mm tickets across in just minutes. The film is ready to tackle much darker themes than the first two installments, as the consequences of Paul’s rise to power shake the very foundations of their world, all culminating in one epic conclusion.

An Underrated Chalamet Movie Is Coming to Free Streaming

If you want to get in the Dune mood and are looking for a lesser-spotted Chalamet performance to help, a free streamer will have you covered next month. Starting July 1, you can watch Hot Summer Nights for free on Plex. This neo-noir thriller is an A24 movie, with Chalamet often teaming up with the entertainment company on projects such as Marty Supreme and Greta Gerwig‘s Lady Bird. Hot Summer Nights, directed by Elijah Bynum, partners Chalamet with the brilliant Maika Monroe as the free-spirited McKayla.

Hot Summer Nights is streaming on Plex this July. Stay tuned to Collider for the latest streaming stories.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Release Date

July 27, 2018

Runtime

107 Minutes

Advertisement

Director

Elijah Bynum

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Love Island USA‘s Aftersun hosts Ciara Miller and Tefi Pessoa finally clarified what “French fries” meant after the code word was used to describe a sex act.

During the Saturday, June 27, episode of the show, Tefi asked what Trinity Tatum meant by that phrase before mimicking a manual sex act with her hand. Ciara confirmed she was right, adding, “French fry — two fingers.”

The Sunday, June 21, episode briefly showed Kenzie and Corbin hooking up in bed. The next morning, Trinity said she heard someone performing “French fries,” which sounded “too wet” to just be a kiss. In a confessional, Kenzie confirmed she shared a heated exchange with Corbin.

“I was definitely getting some French fries. Feeling good,” she gushed. “We were probably doing a bit much honestly but I feel a strong connection with Corbin. We probably got a little bit carried away.”

Related: What Does ‘French Fries’ Sex Mean on ‘Love Island USA’? Code Word Explained

Love Island USA introduced a new code word when “French fries” was used to describe a sex act between Kenzie Annis and Corbin Mims. The Sunday, June 21, episode briefly showed Kenzie and Corbin hooking up in bed. The next morning, Trinity Tatum said she heard someone performing “French fries,” which sounded “too wet” to […]

Based on the footage, French fries hinted at manual sex acts such as a hand job. Viewers, meanwhile, pointed out that it likely meant an appetizer ahead of a full meal.

Love Island USA originally premiered in the U.K. in 2002 before it expanded worldwide with various spinoffs, including Love Island USA on Peacock. The series follows a different group of singles every season who have to pair off in order to stay in the show’s luxury villa.

The contestants — referred to as Islanders — live in isolation in a villa and are under constant video surveillance. They must be coupled up to remain on the show and stand a chance at receiving the$100,000 prize.

While finding a connection that you want to explore more intimately isn’t out of the question, season 7 of Love Island USA seemed to set some sort of record with the amount of times Islanders were caught hooking up — until season 8.

From Hannah Fields and Pepe Garcia to Huda Mustafa and Jeremiah Brown, the reality stars found ways around having to address their sexual encounters for all of America to hear.

“We had a code name for intimacy,” Hannah exclusively told Us Weekly in June 2025. “We would say, ‘How was your journey? What was this journey like?’ Huda [started it when she] said something like, ‘Oh, I had a journey. My journey went all the way.’”

Thank You!

You have successfully subscribed.

Season 8 escalated the sex that took place in the villa with multiple couples going all the way while sharing a bedroom in the villa. The potential has only escalated with Casa Amor being introduced halfway into Sunday’s episode.

New episodes of Love Island USA are released six days a week — except for Wednesdays — on Peacock.

Join Us Weekly and Bracketology.tv in our first-ever Love Island USA fantasy league! This is your chance to predict who you think will win Season 8 and rank the Islanders weekly based on how confident you are that they will survive the next elimination. You will be playing against our editors, get access to exclusive content and have the chance to win fun prizes. Sign up for free today!

Vanderpump Rules alum Tom Sandoval broke his silence amid his legal dispute with ex-girlfriend Victoria Lee Robinson and her father.

On Saturday, June 27, Sandoval, 42, and Robinson, 33, were both in the company of police at the Los Angeles area residence they both shared as they separately removed items from the home. During one heated moment captured by TMZ, a woman — presumed to be Robinson — could be heard telling Sandoval, “I f***ing hate you. Just like all of your ex-girlfriends, nobody likes you.” (Sandoval previously had a contentious breakup with Ariana Madix after he confessed to cheating on her with their Vanderpump Rules costar Rachel “Raquel” Leviss.)

As he left the premises, Sandoval briefly spoke with TMZ about why he and Robinson were both at the property at the same time.

“Victoria and her father were just issued an immediate move out order, a restraining order … The police are here to make sure [they leave],” he explained.

Asked if he thought the dispute would be resolved “today,” he swiftly replied, “No.”

Law enforcement sources told the outlet the police were present simply to keep that peace between both sides and that no laws were broken.

Us Weekly has reached out to representatives for both parties for comment.

On Thursday, June 24, Sandoval requested a domestic violence restraining order against Victoria and her father, J. Will Robinson, accusing them of “verbal and physical abuse” during a confrontation on June 3.

The Traitors star wrote a lengthy declaration to the court where he accused Will of attacking him. He also alleged that Victoria struck him in the face during a heated confrontation over whether she was recording him without permission.

“I am seeking a restraining order against [Will] based on the verbal and physical abuse he has perpetrated against me, the most recent incident being on June 3, wherein he grabbed me and restrained me, chased me into the bedroom and punched a 12-inch hole in my spare bedroom door where I was barricading myself,” Sandoval wrote in his impact statement. “I am afraid of [Will] and his daughter and request the Court’s protection.”

Related: The Return of Tom Sandoval: Why He Feels ‘So Much Healthier’ Today

Fresh off his run on season 3 of The Traitors, Tom Sandoval has settled back into normal life. That means he’s spending plenty of time with his girlfriend, Victoria Lee Robinson. After his split from Ariana Madix, Sandoval, 42, is happy to “grow together” with Robinson, 32. “Victoria is a very strong and supportive woman […]

Advertisement

Per Sandoval, Will “put his face in the hole in the door and smiled telling me he will ‘f***’ me up, ‘destroy’ me and called me a ‘motherf***er.’” Police arrived and arrested Victoria, with Sandoval acknowledging that he helped bail her out of jail.

“Ms. Robinson was arrested when it became clear that she had attacked me. As I saw her being arrested, in the heat of the moment, I asked the police officers the process by which she could be bailed out,” he wrote. “I even foolishly accepted Ms. Robinson’s phone call from jail and lent her mother financial assistance for the bail. In hindsight, I deeply regret that decision.”

Thank You!

You have successfully subscribed.

Advertisement

Sandoval made a litany of other allegations of physical and emotional abuse against the Robinsons, as well as accusing Victoria of tampering with his devices and using a GPS tracker on his car.

An alleged video of the incident subsequently emerged, which appeared to show Sandoval shoving Will into a lit fire pit during a scuffle. He then seemingly fled into the home, with Will following him.

On Friday, June 27, Will filed his own request for a restraining order against Sandoval, alleging that he suffered a ruptured disc in his back, as well as a broken thumb and elbow and a wound on his heel. A court ruled against him initially, stating on Friday that it needed “more information at a properly noticed hearing” before any final decision could be made.

Despite the recent box-office underperformance of Shelter, Jason Statham remains one of the last remaining action stars who can pull audiences on the strength of his name alone. Shelter has been killing it on the home video market, first on PVOD and then on streaming. As we speak, it’s the number one movie on the domestic Starz chart, according to FlixPatrol. Several of his other recent films, particularly The Beekeeper and A Working Man, are essentially fixtures on the streaming charts. Statham’s next offering is The Beekeeper 2, which will be released during the period of the year that he seems to have staked out for his movies: January. Until then, however, his fans can keep themselves entertained with items from his back-catalog. One of Statham’s most overlooked movies is currently available to stream on Paramount+ in the United States, but it won’t stick around for much longer.

The movie in question was released in 2013, but it was originally conceived as part of the Rambo franchise by Sylvester Stallone. The action icon had recently worked with Statham on The Expendables, a franchise that he would eventually attempt to hand over to Statham several years later. The 2013 action movie was written by Stallone himself, and it also featured Winona Ryder, Kate Bosworth, Frank Grillo, and James Franco as the villain. Directed by Gary Fleder, the film was a solid success, grossing $51 million worldwide against a reported budget of $22 million.

Here’s How Long You Have Left to Watch Jason Statham’s Action Movie on Paramount+

We’re talking, of course, about Homefront, which features Statham as a former DEA agent who gets sucked back, John Wick-style, into his dangerous past life while living quietly in Louisiana. The movie holds a 42% score on the aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes, where the consensus reads, “While it boasts a capable cast, the disappointingly dull Homefront hearkens back to classic action thrillers without adding anything to the genre.” Like most Statham movies, Homefront‘s audience score on Rotten Tomatoes is higher than its critics’ score: 61%. This is perhaps one of the many reasons behind its sustained success on streaming. The movie will remain available to stream on the Paramount+ streaming service until July 1. Stay tuned to Collider for more updates.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Release Date

November 27, 2013

Runtime

Advertisement

100 minutes

Director

Gary Fleder

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Tom Bateman joining the film adaptation of The Love Hypothesis is a casting of epic proportions if you know the Star Wars — and Reylo — lore, but how are the two connected?

Ali Hazelwood‘s The Love Hypothesis was an overnight success when the book was published in 2021. But to some Star Wars fans — at least if you rooted for Rey (Daisy Ridley) and Kylo Ren (Adam Driver) — it might have sounded familiar after getting its start as fanfiction.

According to the synopsis, The Love Hypothesis follows Olive as she tries to convince her best friend into thinking her dating life is great. To help with the lie, she pretends to date her professor, Adam, and the twosome try to make everyone around them think they are in love. But soon, they start to forget that their feelings are supposed to be fake.”

The Love Hypothesis becoming a mainstream hit paved the way for it to be developed into a movie, which is where things get interesting. In October 2022, it was announced that a film adaptation of the novel was in development and three years later Lili Reinhart joined the cast. It wasn’t until her onscreen love interest — Bateman — was announced that people pointed out the irony.

Related: Us Breaks Down Casting Choices for 9 Highly Anticipated Book Adaptations

Does the actor fit the book? Chalk this up as a question readers ask every time a new film adaptation is announced. From Scarlett O’Hara to Bella Swan, Harry Potter to Mr. Darcy, the casting of well-known, well-loved book characters is a delicate art. For every actor fans embrace, there’s another they want to cast […]

Bateman isn’t just known for his roles in Murder on the Orient Express, Death on the Nile and Based on a True Story. He has also been married to Ridley since 2023. Yes, the same actress who inspired the fanfiction that then was redeveloped as The Love Hypothesis.

Keep scrolling for a breakdown of the connection — including what Ridley has said about The Love Hypothesis:

What Inspired ‘The Love Hypothesis’?

Before Hazelwood’s The Love Hypothesis was in fact The Love Hypothesis. It was originally a fan fiction story about Rey and Kylo Ren  from the new Star Wars movies. Similar to Fifty Shades of Grey getting its star as Twilight fan fiction, The Love Hypothesis was a story posted to Archive of Our Own with the title Head Over Feet.

“My agent started reading my fanfiction on AO3 and then she reached out with a DM. She was like, ‘I saw that you wrote something about maybe pulling some of your fics and reworking them. And I wanted to tell you that I’m a literary agent and I would love to see you some of your manuscripts, if you’re interested in it,’” the author told Collider in 2021. “And so that’s how I took the fanfiction of mine that I thought was the most reworkable and I sent it to her and then I signed with her. And then after approximately 70 billion more revisions, both with her and an editor … we got a lot of RNRs [revise and resubmits] that didn’t pan out but made the book better, because we got really good feedback.”

How Does Reylo Fit Into the ‘Star Wars’ Equation?

The Star Wars sequel trilogy introduced viewers to a new generation of characters — and relationships. The Force Awakens, which premiered in 2015, hinted at a potential romance between Rey and Finn (John Boyega) after they joined the Resistance in an effort to take down the First Order.

In the next two films, Finn’s story line was put on the back burner as Rey’s unexplained connection with Kylo Ren took center stage.

“I don’t think [their relationship is] all one thing,” Driver explained to Entertainment Weekly in 2019. “Part of the fun of playing it is the boundaries of it keep changing. At times it’s more intimate, sometimes less intimate. Sometimes it’s codependent. And then it’s, obviously, adversarial.”

Meanwhile, Ridley questioned what kind of future the pair could have together. “I do know about Reylo. I don’t know how I feel about it because everyone’s talking about the toxic thing of a relationship when it’s essentially emotional [abuse]. It’s a tricky road,” the actress told fans at Star Wars Celebration that same year.

She added: “I do feel like, deep down, Kylo thinks what he’s doing is right and he doesn’t think he’s wrong, but he has also killed so many people. So I can’t really get behind in that, in a personal way. Maybe there’s redemption. Who knows? Maybe we explore that in the film.”

In The Last Jedi, Rey and Kylo Ren shared a kiss before the villain’s ultimate demise. They don’tend up together, however, since Kylo Ren dies by the end of the movie.

What Hints at Reylo Have Remained in ‘The Love Hypothesis’?

After being published online in 2018 as Head Over Feet, the main characters were renamed Olive and Adam (in honor of Adam Driver) once the story turned into a novel. The Star Wars references were also cut but the cover still features characters designed to resemble Driver and Ridley.

Who Stars in ‘The Love Hypothesis’?

In July 2025, Reinhert announced her involvement in the film adaptation as an executive producer and star. Her onscreen love interest was announced days later and it was none other than Ridley’s real-life husband. The movie will be released on Prime Video on September 23.

Thank You!

You have successfully subscribed.

Advertisement

Have Daisy or Adam Spoken About ‘The Love Hypothesis’?

Ridley was asked about the connection while speaking to Collider in 2023, to which she replied, “I mean, honestly, for anyone to just write a book is so impressive, let alone a New York Times bestseller, let alone something inspired by something I was part of. That’s very thrilling.”

She continued: “So, thank you, if anyone’s reading this. Whoever wrote The Love Hypothesis and The Hurricane Wars. Wow. F***ing cool.”

Bateman, meanwhile, gushed about his wife’s support for his work when asked by ExtraTV in June 2026.