Red Sox Join Impressive Company With Stunning Sweep Of Yankees originally appeared on NESN. Add NESN as a Preferred Source by clicking here.

Prior to Sunday, the 2026 Boston Red Sox didn’t have much in common with the 2018 Red Sox, but they do now.

Advertisement

Boston completed a stunning four-game sweep of the New York Yankees at Fenway Park over the weekend, overcoming a 4-2 deficit in extra innings on Sunday to win the series finale on Jarren Duran‘s walk-off single.

Not only was it the Red Sox’s first four-game winning streak of the season, but it was also their first four-game sweep of the Yankees since August 2-5, 2018.

Boston went on to win a franchise record 108 regular-season games that year and the World Series, capping off the greatest season in team history.

The 2026 campaign has not been as successful for the Red Sox, who have no active players remaining from that 2018 squad. Even after sweeping their top rivals, they are still last in the AL East at 36-46.

Advertisement

There’s still time for them to turn things around, however, and their thrilling sweep could be the spark they need to finally get their season back on track.

More MLB: Red Sox Make Franchise History With Four-Game Sweep Of Yankees

The Minnesota Vikings had some vivid “winners” this offseason, including center Blake Brandel, who is on tap to start at center after the club added no starting-caliber alternative, and wide receiver Justin Jefferson, who now has Kyler Murray to throw him the pigskin on Sundays.

But what about the losers? The Vikings, through their actions, caused some of those, too. Counted down to the biggest loser of the 2026 offseason, here’s the pecking order.

Vikings’ New Depth Chart Squeezes Several Young Players

5. Walter Rouse | OT

Rouse’s path to making the team is actually straightforward.

If the Vikings view him as a guard, he has a much clearer shot at securing a roster spot. If they still see him as a tackle, however, his prospects become challenging. Christian Darrisaw and Brian O’Neill are entrenched starters. Ryan Van Demark was acquired for veteran depth in March, and Caleb Tiernan joined the team in Round 3 of April’s draft. None of these players suggests a need for a “fourth tackle.”

That places Rouse in a difficult position.

He likely wasn’t pleased with Minnesota’s offseason moves unless a position switch is imminent. A move to guard could offer him more opportunities, but remaining at tackle could lead to a numbers game in August that he might not win amid roster cuts.

Adding Van Demark and Tiernan wasn’t ideal for Rouse — unless he’s a guard now.

4. Levi Drake Rodriguez | DT

After Minnesota drafted Caleb Banks in Round 1, there was just no way it would pick another defensive tackle in the first three rounds, right? Wrong.

The Vikings chose “Big Citrus” Domoninque Orange from Iowa State, a run-stuffing nose tackle who profiles to play sooner rather than later. Without the Orange selection, all signs pointed to Rodriguez’s uptick in playing time because Jonathan Allen and Javon Hargrave were dropped in March.

Instead, Rodriguez is back right where he was in 2025 — hoping to snag defensive snaps in a DT room that has three others (Jalen Redmond, Caleb Banks, and Domonique Orange) in front of him.

3. Tai Felton | WR

Felton’s situation has changed rapidly.

For a time, he appeared to be one of the quiet beneficiaries of the offseason. Minnesota did not draft a wide receiver in April, seemingly clearing a path for him to advance on the depth chart. But Rob Brzezinski’s acquisition of Jauan Jennings suddenly provided the Vikings with their strongest WR3 option on paper since Jake Reed.

And that wasn’t the only development.

Dillon Bell has been impressive at minicamp. Myles Price is a strong candidate to stay due to his return game abilities. And, of course, Justin Jefferson and Jordan Addison are not going anywhere. Considering all these factors, Felton may have to earn a job in August rather than simply inheriting it.

There’s another complication: the general manager who drafted him in Round 3 last year was canned in January. Ergo, it’s conceivable that Minnesota could retain Jefferson, Addison, Jennings, Price, and Bell, potentially ending the Felton era after just one season. While this outcome seems drastic, it’s not impossible.

Felton’s future now rests entirely on his performance. He must stand off the page to prove he’s not another failed Kwesi Adofo-Mensah draft pick.

2. Max Brosmer | QB

This one is pretty elementary: the Vikings signed Murray as the QB1 solution in March and re-upped with Carson Wentz. Those moves drove Brosmer to the QB4 spot, which means he’ll either become a practice-squader or be cut in late August.

Without the Wentz re-signing, Brosmer could’ve been the QB3 for the 2026 Vikings. Not happening now.

1. J.J. McCarthy | QB

McCarthy’s 2026 season presents two starkly different possibilities.

By December or January, he could solidify his position as Minnesota’s long-term starting quarterback, fulfilling the Vikings’ original belief in him. On the other hand, he might find himself facing a trade by 2027, left to ponder how quickly his fortunes turned.

The stakes are exceptionally high — through the roof for the young passer. Unlike last year, when the Vikings essentially handed McCarthy the QB1 role without any competition whatsoever, this season promises an intense battle. Murray’s arrival in Minnesota signals his clear intention to play, not to sit behind a 23-year-old quarterback.

McCarthy faces a true test. He could emerge as the hero of 2026 or become trade fodder in 2027. The coming months will begin to reveal which path his career will take.

The Vikings could’ve brushed aside the idea of signing Murray and rolled with McCarthy. Instead, they signed Murray and fired the guy who drafted McCarthy. Unless he prevails as the QB1 to start the regular season against all odds, the offseason was utterly terrible for McCarthy.

Dustin Baker is a novelist and political scientist. His second novel, The Invaders , is out now. So is … More about Dustin Baker

Man Utd forward Marcus Rashford looked sharp for England as they won their group at the World Cup.

Manchester United fans have all thought the same thing during England’s games at the World Cup. Why did Barcelona sign Anthony Gordon over Marcus Rashford?

Gordon started England’s first two games of the tournament, but Rashford scored off the bench against Croatia and looked like the player the Three Lions had been missing when he came on against Ghana.

He earned a start in England’s final group match against Panama, and was one of the brightest attacking threats on the pitch.

Gordon should not start for England for the remainder of the tournament. It was a coin toss between the pair before the World Cup began, but Rashford has outshone the player who Barca snubbed him for.

Thomas Tuchel would have pulled his hair out watching Gordon in the opening two games. He ran down blind alleys, offered zero attacking threat and did not play crosses into the box to service Harry Kane.

Tuchel will like what he’s seen with Rashford. The 28-year-old has been direct and aggressive when he’s been on the ball. He has looked like someone with a major point to prove after missing out on his dream move.

Barcelona paid £70million to sign Gordon from Newcastle when they could have signed Rashford for £26m from United. They have almost paid three times the price for a player half as talented as Rashford.

The decision to sign Gordon over Rashford becomes even more confusing when a closer look at the numbers is taken. Gordon scored 26 goals for Newcastle across the last two seasons, but 11 of those came from the penalty spot.

It’s not difficult to do the math. Gordon has scored 15 non-penalty goals in two years, averaging just over seven per season. Rashford contributed 14 goals and 14 assists during his Barcelona loan spell last term.

The wage demands of both players must have been a significant factor because the footballing reasons don’t add up. Gordon earned around £150,000 per week at Newcastle, while Rashford’s wages have returned to £325,000-a-week by virtue of United securing qualification for next season’s Champions League.

Barcelona could have doubled Gordon’s salary and still pay him less than Rashford earns. For context, Rashford signed his current United contract in the summer of 2023, following an impressive 30-goal campaign.

Even when the players’ wages are considered, is that enough reason to pay £44m more to sign Gordon? Perhaps Barcelona’s stubbornness in negotiations to sign Rashford again forced their hand.

United agreed a £26m buy option when Barcelona signed Rashford on loan, but noise emerged during the campaign that claimed the La Liga giants wanted to pay a reduced fee. They wanted to haggle.

Barcelona may have got what they wanted in the past, but United’s board are aware they can no longer be taken for mugs in the transfer market, and insisted that Barca cough up £26m.

Still, it wasn’t a good look for Rashford when Barcelona paid a significantly higher fee to sign Gordon, although, to Rashford’s credit, his performances at the World Cup have flipped the situation, making Barca look daft.

The question now is what happens with Rashford. Some United fans who are strongly opposed to the idea of him returning were concerned to read Harry Maguire say he would welcome him back with open arms.

There are other supporters who would like to see Michael Carrick reintergate him to the squad. Those fans argue that if United want to strengthen their left flank, then why not reintroduce Rashford to the dressing room?

Rashford is set to report for United’s pre-season once he enjoys a break after the World Cup and United are fine with the possibility of him returning.

Carrick has played with Rashford, coached him, and briefly managed him. In April, the Old Trafford boss suggested the door was open for Rashford to return at a press conference, though those comments felt like a stock answer.

United’s bargaining power with Rashford would have been damaged if Carrick had come out swinging and said he wouldn’t return to the club, even though he’s not the kind of character who would make such a statement.

It feels like Rashford’s future has become a saga, and we’re only two weeks into the transfer window. United are relaxed about the situation and know strong performances at the World Cup can only stir up interest.

Rising star Mathys Detourbet has joined Manchester City from sister club Troyes.

The French outfit, who won promotion back to the top tier this season, announced the 19-year-old’s departure with reports in France putting the fee at around £21.5million.

The Manchester Evening News understands the youngster has penned a five-year contract at the Etihad and is expected to join Monaco on loan for next season.

The teenager has come through the ranks at Troyes – also part of the City Football Group – and impressed last season with three goals and five assists in 33 appearances, most of which came off the bench.

The forward has been playing on the left hand side but is also comfortable through the middle. A move to Monaco, who finished seventh in the French top flight last season and missed out on European qualification, would offer City the chance to see how Detourbet fares in one of Europe’s top five leagues.

The City new boy has been with Troyes since the age of eight and has been capped at youth level by France.

In announcing his exit, Troyes said: “Having come through the club’s youth system and deeply attached to its colours, Mathys perfectly embodies the youth development work carried out by ESTAC for many years. His progression from the Academy to the first team is a source of great pride for the entire club and an example for the young players who are now continuing their journey within the training centre.

“ESTAC is particularly proud to have supported Mathys in his development as a player and as a man, from his first steps at the club to this major new stage in his career. The entire club warmly thanks Mathys for his commitment, professionalism and dedication to the Troyes colours throughout his career. ESTAC wishes him every success and much success for the rest of his career.”

City have agreed a deal for Elliot Anderson for £116m from Nottingham Forest with that move expected to be completed in the coming days with the player to undergo a medical while on World Cup duty with England.

The PGA Tour’s best roll through Connecticut for the last signature event of the season

Advertisement

Jun 28, 2026

at

9:26 pm ET

•

1 min read

The FIFA World Cup has always celebrated national identity. Players wear their country’s colours, sing the anthem and represent millions of supporters back home.

Yet in modern football, nationality is rarely a simple story. The 2026 FIFA World Cup has become perhaps the strongest example yet of how migration, family heritage and evolving FIFA eligibility rules have transformed international football into a truly global competition.

Nearly one in every four players at this tournament was born outside the nation they represent.

Far from weakening international football, that diversity has enriched it.

The expanded 48-team tournament has produced stories that would have been impossible a generation ago, players facing the country where they were born, nations discovering talent across continents, and football becoming more representative of the multicultural societies many countries have become.

A truly global World Cup

Out of the 1,248 footballers selected for the 2026 World Cup, almost 300 represent a country different from their place of birth. Only a handful of participating nations have squads made up entirely of home-born players.

For everyone else, international football has become a reflection of modern society, where migration, dual citizenship and multicultural families have created new footballing identities.

Some players were born abroad because their parents emigrated before they were born. Others moved countries as children. Some hold dual nationality through parents or grandparents, while others became eligible after years of residency.

The result is a World Cup that reflects the increasingly connected nature of today’s world.

France: Football’s biggest exporter of talent

No nation illustrates this better than France. France brought one of the strongest squads to the World Cup, yet it also exported more footballers to other national teams than any country in the tournament.

A remarkable 76 French-born players are representing countries other than France. Many of them will even face France during the competition.

Senegal alone included ten French-born footballers in its squad. Algeria selected thirteen. Haiti had twelve.

Ivory Coast and DR Congo also relied heavily on players developed inside the French football system. France’s incredible production line means it effectively contributes talent to almost every continent. It is no coincidence that French academies continue to produce some of world football’s finest players year after year. Paris has become football’s biggest talent factory

Much of that production comes from one extraordinary region. Greater Paris has quietly become the world’s greatest football talent hub. Despite accounting for less than one-fifth of France’s population, the Paris metropolitan area continues producing elite footballers at an astonishing rate.

Many of France’s biggest stars began their journeys there. Even more remarkably, countless players who eventually chose other national teams also developed within the same football ecosystem.

Eligibility rules have evolved with football

The modern World Cup would not look like this without FIFA’s evolving eligibility regulations. Earlier generations of players had very little flexibility.

Representing one country at youth level often ended any possibility of switching national allegiance later. Over the last two decades, however, FIFA has gradually modernised those rules to reflect changing realities.

Today, players can represent a nation if they qualify through birth, parents, grandparents or long-term residency. Several amendments have also allowed players to make one-time nationality switches under specific circumstances, particularly if they had not fully established themselves in senior international football.

Those changes have allowed footballers to choose the nation that best reflects both their identity and their career. Some of the tournament’s best stories exist because of these rules

The World Cup has produced countless examples of players balancing multiple identities. England-born striker Folarin Balogun now leads the line for the United States. Jamal Musiala represented England at youth level before choosing Germany.

Brian Gutierrez switched from the United States to Mexico. Crystal Palace goalkeeper Owen Goodman eventually became eligible for Canada after successfully proving his residency links.

Every tournament now features players representing countries connected through family history rather than simply birthplace. Instead of reducing national identity, these stories often strengthen it.

Many players speak emotionally about honouring their parents or grandparents by wearing their ancestral country’s shirt. Federations now scout family trees as carefully as footballers

Finding eligible players has become a specialised process. National associations now employ scouts whose job extends far beyond watching matches. They study family backgrounds, immigration records and youth academies across Europe.

Some federations maintain databases tracking dual-national prospects years before they reach senior football. Others rely on personal contacts, local communities and even video games such as Football Manager to identify potential internationals.

Once a player is identified, convincing them becomes another challenge entirely. Countries regularly organise meetings with players and their families, present long-term sporting projects and build personal relationships before a final decision is made.

International recruitment has become almost as competitive as club recruitment.

Smaller nations are benefiting more than ever

Perhaps the biggest winners are countries with smaller footballing populations. Curacao, making its World Cup debut, relied heavily on players born in the Netherlands.

Canada has expanded its player pool by recruiting footballers with Canadian family connections across Europe. Several African nations continue strengthening their squads through players developed in European academies while maintaining close family ties to their ancestral homeland.

Without these eligibility pathways, many emerging football nations would struggle to compete with traditional powers. Instead, they now arrive at World Cups with deeper squads and greater international experience.

Football’s biggest tournament now reflects the modern world Critics occasionally question whether foreign-born players dilute international football. The evidence from this World Cup suggests the opposite.

Every multicultural squad tells a story of migration, heritage and identity. Players proudly represent nations connected to their families, cultures and childhoods, even if those connections stretch across continents. Rather than reducing authenticity, these stories have added emotional depth to the tournament.

The modern World Cup is no longer simply about where someone was born. It is about where they belong.

And in making room for those identities, FIFA’s eligibility rules have helped create perhaps the most inclusive, representative and globally connected World Cup the sport has ever seen.