Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

Banks push OCC to curb crypto trust charters until GENIUS rules clear

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

The American Bankers Association is pressing the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency to slow the wheel on national trust bank charters for crypto and stablecoin firms until key questions around the GENIUS Act, which would reshape U.S. stablecoin regulation, are settled. In a recent comment letter responding to the OCC’s notice of proposed rulemaking on national bank charters, the ABA warned that the sector’s regulatory picture remains fragmented across federal and state authorities. The trade group argued that advancing applications now could leave uninsured, digital-asset‑focused trusts exposed to unresolved safety, operational, and resolution issues, even as the industry connects customer assets to federally chartered platforms.

The ABA’s critique centers on the risk that a patchwork of oversight can create gaps for entities that manage crypto and stablecoins. The letter contends that until forthcoming GENIUS Act rulemakings lay out clear regulatory obligations, it would be prudent for the OCC to pause or slow down approvals. The GENIUS Act, which aims to streamline or redefine how digital assets fit into the U.S. banking framework, has not yet produced a settled regulatory map. Without that clarity, the ABA argues, banks seeking charters could face obligations that are not yet defined, complicating risk management and supervisory expectations for these new structures.

Beyond governance, the association underscored distinct safety and soundness concerns tied to uninsured, digital-asset‑focused national trusts. Chief among them are questions about how customer assets are segregated and protected, potential conflicts of interest, and the cyber safeguards necessary to withstand sophisticated threats. The letter points to the possibility that uninsured digital-asset trusts could be used to sidestep traditional registration and scrutiny by agencies such as the SEC or CFTC when activities would ordinarily trigger securities or derivatives regulation. The overarching worry is that these charters could become a back door to bypass comprehensive, integrated oversight.

The ABA’s stance comes as the OCC has recently moved to greenlight a path for several crypto firms to hold and manage customer digital assets under a federal charter while staying outside the deposit-taking and lending business. In December 2025, the OCC granted conditional national trust bank approvals to five notable players: Bitgo Bank & Trust, Fidelity Digital Assets, Ripple National Trust Bank, First National Digital Currency Bank, and Paxos Trust Company. This sequence—clear progress followed by calls for prudence—has amplified calls from industry observers and policymakers to align new models with robust regulatory guardrails.

Advertisement

As the regulatory dialogue intensifies, the broader banking lobby has amplified its push for Congress to act. Proposals such as the Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act have gained attention for attempting to curb the appeal of stablecoin rewards and other yield-bearing programs that could blur the line between traditional banking products and crypto offerings. At the same time, coverage of GENIUS Act proposals has underscored the tension between innovation and prudential supervision. The industry’s worry is that without a unified framework, chartered entities could be forced into a regulatory limbo where consumer protection and financial stability are not fully safeguarded.

While the ABA’s letter emphasizes caution, the OCC’s recent actions reflect a different facet of the ongoing balancing act: enabling regulated access to digital assets under a federal charter while attempting to avoid the full deposit-taking framework. The OCC’s stance has drawn support from some voices within the crypto sector who argue for clear, uniform standards that would prevent a fragmented patchwork of state-by-state approaches. The debate also intersects with ongoing discussions about how to treat banks and crypto similarly or differently, a point highlighted by industry and regulatory leaders alike. A separate OCC statement and related commentary have argued that there is no justification to treat banks and crypto differently; the underlying question remains how to translate those principles into enforceable, uniform rules across multiple agencies.

​Warning after new crypto trust charters

The timing of the ABA’s intervention is notable: it follows the OCC’s conditional approvals announced earlier in December 2025 that would allow these firms to hold and manage customer digital assets under a federal umbrella while remaining out of the deposit-taking and lending business. The OCC described these structures as national trusts designed to segregate digital assets and provide custody capabilities without converting to traditional banking operations. The five charter recipients—Bitgo Bank & Trust, Fidelity Digital Assets, Ripple National Trust Bank, First National Digital Currency Bank, and Paxos Trust Company—represent a cross-section of the market and reflect a broader appetite to experiment with federal oversight in the crypto custody space. The OCC’s action signals a potential pathway for regulated custody of digital assets, even as lawmakers and industry groups push for clarifying legislation and more precise supervisory expectations.

The push for governance clarity is not happening in a vacuum. Industry participants and lawmakers alike have been weighing proposals like GENIUS Act and CLARITY Act, which seek to define the boundaries of crypto activities within the traditional banking regime and curb practices that could be mischaracterized as bank-like products without full bank regulation. The evolving regulatory mosaic poses a dilemma for firms seeking charters: how to align innovative custody models with a robust, predictable framework that ensures customer protection and systemic stability—without dampening the competitiveness and speed of financial-technology innovation.

Advertisement

As regulatory scoping continues to evolve, observers note that the OCC’s framework for conditional approvals to national trust charters could have meaningful implications for market structure, consumer safeguards, and the scope of permissible activities for non-deposit-taking digital asset custodians. The tension between fostering innovation and ensuring a resilient financial system remains at the heart of the debate. Several pieces of legislation and policy proposals that would influence this trajectory are already in circulation, reinforcing the sense that 2026 could be a critical year for how crypto custody and stablecoins are governed at the federal level.

Why it matters

For investors, the ongoing regulatory clarifications affect risk assessment and the perceived legitimacy of crypto custody solutions. A formal, well-defined regulatory framework could reduce ambiguity around the protections afforded to customer assets held by uninsured digital-asset trusts and influence risk pricing for associated products. For builders and operators, clear rules can help map out feasible business models that align with capital, governance, and risk-management expectations. And for policymakers, the interplay between GENIUS Act provisions, banking supervision, and securities/derivatives regulation underscores a key objective: ensuring that innovation remains aligned with financial stability and consumer protection.

From a market structure perspective, the debate highlights how custody and settlement infrastructures could evolve under federal oversight. If the OCC’s conditional trust charters become a common feature, watchers will be looking for transparency around capital requirements, resilience standards, and the safeguards that would prevent consumer confusion—especially around institutions that use “bank” in their names for branding purposes despite not engaging in traditional banking activities. The industry’s insistence on naming rules reflects a broader concern about trust and clarity in a landscape where digital assets can be held by entities operating under a federal umbrella but without full deposit-taking powers.

Meanwhile, the GENIUS Act and related proposals continue to shape the policy dialogue on stablecoins and digital assets within the U.S. financial system. As the regulatory math evolves, the market will be watching how agencies interpret and implement these concepts in real-world chartering decisions. The balancing act remains: enable responsible innovation in custody and settlement while preserving a robust, transparent, and enforceable supervisory regime that protects consumers and maintains market integrity.

Advertisement

What to watch next

  • OCC’s formal response to the ABA comment letter and any adjustments to the proposed rulemaking timeline.
  • Developments in GENIUS Act rulemaking and any accompanying guidance that clarifies obligations for crypto custody under national bank charters.
  • Details on the five crypto firms granted conditional national trust charters, including milestones for capital, risk controls, and asset segregation.
  • Legislative progress on the CLARITY Act and related measures that would influence stablecoin governance and disclosure requirements.

Sources & verification

  • The ABA letter to the OCC regarding national bank chartering (PDF).
  • OCC press release: conditional national trust bank approvals for Bitgo Bank & Trust, Fidelity Digital Assets, Ripple National Trust Bank, First National Digital Currency Bank, and Paxos Trust Company (nr-occ-2025-125.html).
  • OCC updates on GENIUS Act-related rulemaking and related policy discussions cited in industry coverage.
  • Cointelegraph reporting on the OCC’s stance toward treating banks and crypto equally and the broader lobbying around the GENIUS Act and related reforms.

What the ABA letter says, in context

The ABA’s position centers on prudence and transparency. The association argues that the OCC should resist rushing charter approvals for entities handling uninsured customer funds in crypto and stablecoin operations until the GENIUS Act rulemakings are fully defined and integrated into a coherent supervisory framework. It emphasizes that without a clear, comprehensive set of obligations, chartered entities could encounter undefined capital, operational resilience, and customer-protection standards. The letter calls for greater clarity on how capital and resilience benchmarks will be calibrated in conditional approvals and presses for tighter naming rules to prevent consumer confusion when entities use “bank” in their branding, despite not engaging in traditional banking activities. The overarching theme is to align innovation with robust safeguards and to keep deposit-empowered banks as the reference point for consumer protections and risk management.

Key figures and next steps

As the regulatory conversation continues, observers will be watching a trio of developments: the OCC’s formal responses to stakeholder comments, the progression of GENIUS Act rulemaking, and the practical implications of the five conditional charter approvals already granted. The dialogue around whether banks and crypto should be treated differently is likely to persist, but the current emphasis appears to be on ensuring that any new chartering framework provides explicit obligations and strong oversight. With policy and industry stakeholders navigating these questions, the coming months could define how crypto custody, stablecoin issuance, and related digital-asset activities are integrated into the U.S. banking system on a long-term, predictable basis.

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Quantum-resistant tokens jump 50% as Google flags risks to Bitcoin security

Published

on

Flow Traders debuts 24/7 OTC liquidity service for tokenized stocks, gold and money market funds

The market appears to be reassessing long‑term technological risks in crypto following Google’s major quantum computing research update on Monday.

While leading coins like bitcoin and ether (ETH) have seen only modest moves in the past 24 hours, several cryptocurrencies tied to the quantum‑resistant narrative have surged sharply, with some gaining more than 50%.

This outperformance of the so-called quantum-resistant tokens shows how quickly the market is pricing in potential technological risks, even if those are still theoretical. While quantum computers capable of attacking Bitcoin are still years away, traders are already signaling an appetite for “future-proof” assets.

Late Monday, Google’s Quantum AI team suggested that quantum computers could break the elliptic‑curve cryptography used by Bitcoin, with fewer than 500,000 quantum qubits, which is significantly less than previously estimated. This prompted some analysts to cite 2029 as a potential deadline for Bitcoin and the broader blockchain ecosystem to strengthen their defenses.

Advertisement

The study said that a sufficiently advanced quantum computer could attack Bitcoin within nine minutes. A separate report highlighted Ethereum’s vulnerabilities, identifying five potential attack vectors that could put an estimated $100 billion of assets at risk, including DeFi and tokenized holdings.

However, such machines do not exist and remain a threat that’s still a few years away.

Still, over the past 24 hours, the market has shown increased interest in cryptocurrencies and projects that emphasize post‑quantum cryptographic designs, research into future‑proofing security, or that appear relatively more resilient than legacy chains.

Notably, Quantum Resistant Ledger (QRL) and Cellframe (CEL) have surged 50%, reflecting growing market attention to truly post‑quantum protocols, according to data source Coingecko. Other tokens in the category, such as Abelian (ABEL), have risen 25%, while Qubic (QUBIC) and QANplatform (QANX) have each gained 10%, and even the privacy‑focused Zcash (ZEC) has added nearly 7% in the same period.

Advertisement

The market cap of this group, comprising 20 coins, has increased by 8% to $4.66 billion over the past 24 hours. It’s worth noting that ZEC is not yet truly quantum-resistant but is still included in the category by data sources because of its advanced cryptographic foundations, such as zero-knowledge proofs, and ongoing research into post-quantum secure ZK-SNARKs. These factors make it part of the “quantum-aware” narrative, even if it does not currently fully implement post-quantum cryptography.

While the risks remain largely theoretical, they have been influencing market behavior since last year. According to Charles Edwards, founder of Capriole Investments, concerns over quantum attacks contributed to Bitcoin’s decoupling from the rising stock market in the second half of 2025, with the cryptocurrency sliding from $126,000 to $80,000 in the final months of the year.

“We have already started to see quantum risk be priced into Bitcoin. It’s the primary reason Bitcoin is trading -50% against the S&P 500 and -90% against gold since the inaugural Bitcoin Quantum Summit seven months ago,” Edwards said in a report in February.

Coincidentally, this was exactly the period when ZEC staged a sharp rally. ZEC surged by over 1,200% in the second half of 2025, hitting a high of $744.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Crypto asset manager CoinShares (CSHR) to list on Nasdaq after $1.2 billion SPAC deal

Published

on

Crypto asset manager CoinShares (CSHR) to list on Nasdaq after $1.2 billion SPAC deal

CoinShares, a leading European digital asset manager with over $6 billion under management, is set to begin trading on the Nasdaq Stock Market under the ticker symbol CSHR.

The listing follows a $1.2 billion merge with Vine Hill Capital Investment Corp., a U.S.-based special purpose acquisition company (SPAC).

The asset manager, which had previously traded on the Nasdaq Stockholm in Sweden under the CoinShares International entity, formed CoinShares PLC through the merger.

The listing comes after BitGo (BTGO), went public earlier in the year, while various crypto firms listed in 2025 including stablecoin issuer Circle (CRCL), CoinDesk owner Bullish (BLSH), and exchange Gemini (GEMI).

Advertisement

CoinShares built its business around crypto exchange-traded products (ETPs) and now manages 39 funds across four platforms. The company generates most of its revenue through recurring fees, a model it says supports strong profitability and free cash flow.

“We are diversifying both our product and revenue mix, including new capabilities in listed asset management, active alternative strategies. and decentralized finance,” CEO Jean-Marie Mognetti said.

For investors, the move opens a new U.S.-based option to gain exposure to crypto markets through a firm already established in Europe. CoinShares says it’s leading the market in the continent with a 34% share.

CoinShares’ U.S. expansion will include product development and acquisitions, while proximity to U.S. regulators may help it adapt quickly to shifting compliance standards in the crypto sector.

Advertisement

UPDATE (April 1, 14:15 UTC): Updates to reflect that CoinShares previously traded on Nasdaq Stockholm

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Ripple rolls out enterprise crypto treasury platform for corporates

Published

on

Ripple launches Ripple Treasury to help Arc Miner modernize its enterprise cash and digital asset management

Ripple’s Digital Asset Accounts and Unified Treasury let corporates manage fiat, RLUSD, XRP and other tokens inside existing treasury systems, targeting on‑chain cash and stablecoin demand.

Summary

  • Ripple has launched Digital Asset Accounts and Unified Treasury, a crypto fund-management stack for corporate finance teams.
  • The platform lets enterprises manage fiat, RLUSD and XRP alongside other digital assets within existing treasury workflows.
  • The launch builds on Ripple’s acquisition of GTreasury and targets rising demand for on-chain cash and stablecoins in corporate treasury.

Ripple has unveiled an enterprise-grade cryptocurrency fund-management system designed to let corporate finance teams manage fiat and digital assets on a single platform, in its latest push beyond cross-border payments into full-stack treasury infrastructure. The new stack, branded Digital Asset Accounts and Unified Treasury, allows companies to oversee assets such as RLUSD and XRP directly within existing treasury systems, without the need for separate wallets, exchanges or third-party custodians, according to a report from Decrypt.

Advertisement

The system embeds crypto rails into conventional treasury workflows, effectively turning tokenized balances into another line item alongside existing cash and securities positions. Ripple said the integration “supports corporate finance teams in managing fiat and digital assets on the same platform,” lowering onboarding frictions for enterprises that want exposure to stablecoins and on-chain liquidity but are unwilling to re-architect their internal controls around consumer-grade wallets. The release leverages Ripple’s earlier acquisition of corporate treasury platform GTreasury, a deal the company framed at the time as a way to “embed crypto capabilities into mature corporate financial infrastructure” and plug directly into CFO tech stacks, as previously reported by Decrypt and The Financial Times.

Shift from remittances to on-chain cash management

Ripple’s move comes as stablecoins and tokenized deposits are increasingly used for working capital and cross-border settlement, rather than purely speculative trading. In an earlier interview with Bloomberg, Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse argued that “on-chain cash management and real-time liquidity” would be the next major adoption wave for digital assets, as corporates look for faster settlement and programmability without taking on directional crypto risk. By offering a unified treasury view over fiat, RLUSD, XRP and other digital balances, Ripple is positioning its stack as a direct competitor to bank-led tokenization platforms and infrastructure from players like JPMorgan’s Onyx, which already processes trillions of dollars in tokenized intraday repo and payments flows, according to public filings reported by Bloomberg.finance.

In parallel, on-chain cash tools have been gaining traction across the broader market. A recent Forbes analysis of prediction and on-chain markets noted that institutional demand for programmable dollar exposure helped push real-world asset and stablecoin-related protocols to more than $13 billion in monthly volumes by late 2025. Against that backdrop, Ripple’s enterprise treasury product signals a deliberate shift: from being seen primarily as a remittances company tied to XRP price cycles, toward becoming a vendor of compliant, plug-in crypto infrastructure for corporate finance teams that increasingly treat tokenized dollars as part of their core liquidity stack.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

eToro wins New York BitLicense, expands crypto access to 48 US states

Published

on

eToro wins New York BitLicense, expands crypto access to 48 US states

eToro has secured a New York BitLicense and money transmission license, reopening crypto trading to New Yorkers and extending its US coverage to 48 states after a 2024 SEC settlement.

Summary

  • eToro has secured both a New York BitLicense and a money transmission license, opening its crypto platform to residents of New York.
  • The approvals mean eToro now offers cryptocurrency trading in 48 US states, following a $1.5 million settlement with the SEC in 2024.
  • The company calls New York “the heart of the financial markets” and frames the move as a strategic milestone in its US expansion.

Online brokerage and social trading platform eToro has obtained a coveted New York BitLicense and a parallel money transmission license, clearing the way for residents of the state to trade cryptocurrencies on its platform for the first time. The twin approvals from the New York State Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) mean eToro’s crypto offering now reaches 48 US states, according to a report from Crowdfund Insider cited by ChainCatcher.

Announcing the launch, Andrew McCormick, head of eToro’s US division, said that “New York is the heart of the financial markets and a hub of innovation,” describing the expansion as “both a strategic milestone and a reflection of our commitment to responsibly advancing the next generation of financial market accessibility.” NYDFS’s BitLicense regime, introduced in 2015, remains one of the strictest state-level crypto frameworks in the US, with only a limited number of exchanges and custodians approved over the past decade, as repeatedly highlighted by outlets such as Bloomberg and the Financial Times.finance.

Advertisement

The New York green light comes roughly two years after eToro resolved an enforcement action with the US Securities and Exchange Commission. In 2024, the company agreed to pay a $1.5 million civil penalty to settle charges that it operated as an unregistered broker and clearing agency, and subsequently delisted most crypto assets from its US platform while it overhauled its compliance controls. That retrenchment mirrored a broader regulatory crackdown on offshore-style token menus, with major venues trimming their listings in response to SEC and CFTC pressure, as detailed in earlier reporting by Bloomberg and the Wall Street Journal on post-2022 enforcement trends.finance.

Since then, eToro has adopted a more conservative US stance, focusing on a narrower range of assets and building out its compliance and surveillance stack to meet NYDFS standards. By securing the BitLicense, the firm joins a small club of global exchanges able to serve New York retail customers, preserving a regulatory moat that rivals without state approval cannot easily cross. For US users, the expansion means a familiar social-trading interface will now sit alongside licensed incumbents in the country’s most tightly regulated crypto market, while for the industry it offers a template for how post-enforcement platforms can re-enter New York — provided they accept heavier oversight and a slimmer token set.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bitcoin’s (BTC) parabolic era may be over as old peaks are tested

Published

on

BTC's price swings in candlestick format. (TradingView)

Since its inception, bitcoin has been like a daredevil climber scaling new heights, rarely looking back at the ledges it left behind. Its price seldom retraced to previous bull-market peaks, even during long, grueling bear markets.

But that pattern seems to have changed, suggesting that the market has matured, and the era of runaway, parabolic gains is behind us.

BTC trades near old peak

Bitcoin has been hovering around $70,000 since early February – well below the $126,000 peak of the 2023-2025 bull run.

That $70,000 mark is important because it was the record high in the 2019–2022 market cycle. In other words, this bear market has retraced all the way back to a previous summit.

Advertisement

This is unusual. In earlier bear markets, such as those in 2014 and 2018, bitcoin never returned to prior cycle highs. The exception was 2022, when prices dipped under the 2017 high of $20,000. At the time, analysts dismissed it as an anomaly, blaming crypto scams and massive deleveraging.

What makes the current retrace remarkable is that it’s happening without any extreme catalysts. The market has simply returned to a prior peak as part of the natural ebb of a bear cycle.

BTC's price swings in candlestick format. (TradingView)

Slowing growth and the law of diminishing returns

Each new bull run isn’t generating the parabolic gains of the past. Pushing prices far beyond previous peaks is getting harder, which makes retraces to old highs more natural. In other words, previous peaks are no longer untouchable.

This is a clear example of the law of diminishing returns. As bitcoin becomes more expensive, moving prices higher requires ever-larger sums of capital. The days when modest inflows could trigger massive rallies are largely behind us, making price movements more measured and predictable.

Looking at historical growth highlights this trend:

Advertisement
  • The 2013 peak was 38 times higher than 2011.
  • The 2017 peak was 16 times higher than 2013.
  • By 2021, the increase slowed to just 3 times the 2017 level.
  • The 2025 peak of over $126K was less than twice the 2021 peak.

While prices are still rising, the pace of growth is steadily slowing.

Institutionalization and broader market participation

Part of this slowdown comes from the institutionalization of Bitcoin and the growth of the derivatives market. Traders now have structured ways to bet on volatility, timing, and market direction, not just price increases. This broader participation has tempered extreme swings.

This is very different from the pre-2020 era, when trading was largely limited to buying and selling on the spot market. Back then, only bullish believers of bitcoin actively participated, often jumping in at the first sign of a dip.

Behavioral patterns and what’s next

Old peaks often act as strong support levels due to a behavioral concept called anchoring bias, where traders fixate on previous highs as reference points.

Many who missed the initial breakout tend to buy when prices return to these familiar levels, fueling the next leg of a bull run. This behavioral tendency, combined with the self-reinforcing nature of support and resistance, helps explain why the recent downtrend has stalled around $70,000.

Advertisement

A strong bounce from this level could signal that the bear market has run its course, similar to late 2022, when the downtrend ended around $20,000.

However, if the law of diminishing returns is any guide, the next uptrend may be more measured and “tradfi-like,” rather than the frenzied rallies of the old speculative days.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Shiba Inu Price Prediction: Time to Say Goodbye To Millionaire Dreams?

Published

on

Shiba Inu is consolidating below $0.000006 price level, a line that has flipped from support to resistance, dragging any bullish prediction.

Shiba Inu is trading at $0.00000597, up 0.93% in the last 24 hours, a modest price bounce that masks a bruising -4.4% seven-day slide, and the prediction is not looking good. The dog coin that minted actual millionaires in 2021 is now fighting to hold a six-zero price handle.

The 24-hour rebound followed a technical defense of the $0.0000056 support zone after six consecutive red sessions. Trading activity surged 70%, accompanied by a positive buy-sell delta of 27.4 billion SHIB.

On-chain data confirmed net exchange outflows of 112–125 billion SHIB, stripping near-term selling pressure from the order book. That confluence, volume spike, positive delta, and exchange drain are historically the setup SHIB needs before a short-term leg higher.

But can SHIB print more millionaires at this level? Are memecoins’ communities no longer able to catapult a coin?

Advertisement

Discover: The best pre-launch token sales

Shiba Inu Price Prediction: Reclaim $0.000007 Before April Ends, or Dream Shattered?

Shiba Inu is consolidating just below the $0.000006 price resistance level, a line that has flipped from support to resistance over multiple sessions, dragging down bullish sentiment.

Advertisement

Key levels to track: support clusters at $0.0000056–$0.0000059, with resistance stacked at $0.0000060–$0.0000065 and a more meaningful ceiling near the historical $0.000018–$0.000020 range.

Three scenarios are currently in play:

Shiba Inu is consolidating below $0.000006 price level, a line that has flipped from support to resistance, dragging any bullish prediction.
SHIB USD, Tradingview
  • Bull case: SHIB flips $0.000006 with sustained volume, targets $0.0000065–$0.000007 within days. Exchange outflows accelerating would confirm this path.
  • Base case: Price consolidates between $0.0000057–$0.0000062, grinding sideways as macro uncertainty limits conviction.
  • Bear case: Failure to hold $0.0000056 opens a drop toward $0.0000050, invalidating the current rebound thesis entirely.

The 589 trillion SHIB still in circulation remains the structural ceiling on any millionaire-making moon run. People have noted SHIB’s sensitivity to external catalysts. The October 2024 Elon Musk effect pushed volume to $145 million in 48 hours, but that event is, by definition, unpredictable.

SHIB could deliver decent returns. Delivering millionaire returns from this market cap? That math gets harder every cycle.

Discover: The best crypto to diversify your portfolio with

Advertisement

Maxi Doge Targets Early Mover Upside as Shiba Inu Tests Key Levels

Here’s the uncomfortable reality SHIB holders face: at today’s price, the multiplier required to turn a $1,000 stake into a million dollars simply doesn’t exist at current valuations without a market cap that would rival entire national economies. It’s arithmetic.

Traders chasing the next generational meme coin trade are increasingly looking at earlier-stage projects where the supply-to-price math still works in their favor.

Maxi Doge ($MAXI) is one presale capturing that rotation. The project has raised more than $4.7 million at a current price of just $0.0002811. The concept leans hard into gym-bro meme culture with holder-only trading competitions, leaderboard rewards, and a Maxi Fund treasury dedicated to liquidity and partnerships.

Advertisement

Recent capital flows into the presale have drawn comparisons to early-stage SHIB momentum. Staking is live with a 66% APY bonus. For traders weighing SHIB’s structural ceiling against earlier-stage upside, researching Maxi Doge is worth the ten minutes.

This article is not financial advice. Crypto investments are highly volatile and speculative. Always conduct your own research before investing.

The post Shiba Inu Price Prediction: Time to Say Goodbye To Millionaire Dreams? appeared first on Cryptonews.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Gold Price Prediction: Worst Month in 17 Years fo Save Haven Rock

Published

on

Gold price climbed 2.2%, but the bounce barely registers against a 12% monthly collapse, which resulted in a more grim-looking prediction.

Gold is hemorrhaging value. Spot gold price climbed 2.2% to $4,687/oz, but that bounce barely registers against a 12% monthly collapse that has the metal on track for its worst monthly performance since October 2008, which resulted in a more grim-looking prediction.

The safe-haven narrative is cracking.

The catalyst yesterday was a Wall Street Journal report that President Donald Trump signaled willingness to end the U.S. military campaign against Iran, even if the Strait of Hormuz remains partially closed.

Advertisement

“Gold prices are bouncing in early Asia-Pacific trade after U.S. President Donald Trump told aides he is willing to end the U.S. military campaign against Iran… That triggered a risk-on response from financial markets,” said Ilya Spivak, head of global macro at Tastylive.

U.S. gold futures for April delivery gained 1.2% to $4,611.30 in tandem. The dollar eased, providing additional tailwind to greenback-denominated bullion.

Despite the daily reprieve, the macro structure driving gold’s rout remains intact, and Fed policy signals from Powell continue pointing toward a higher-for-longer rate environment that structurally penalizes non-yielding assets.

Discover: The best crypto to diversify your portfolio with

Gold Price Prediction: Can XAU Reclaim $5,000 Before the Fed Blinks?

Advertisement

Today’s relief rally puts spot gold close to $4,700, up 1.5% intraday. This figure looks strong in isolation against March’s 13% drawdown from prior highs above $5,000.

Spivak flagged a critical technical signal: “Gold has been stabilizing for about a week now, with a rally last Friday a particular standout. That came alongside a drop in Treasury yields that seems to suggest the markets are starting to see the Iran war as a recession risk.”

Falling yields reduce the opportunity cost of holding gold, that’s the bull mechanism. Quarterly gains still hold at approximately 5%, confirming the longer-term trend hasn’t broken.

Gold price climbed 2.2%, but the bounce barely registers against a 12% monthly collapse, which resulted in a more grim-looking prediction.
XAU USD, Tradingview

For the gold price, if de-escalation holds, Treasury yields slide further, Fed language softens on inflation, gold can re-targets $4,800–$5,000 resistance recovery. Goldman Sachs maintains a $5,400/oz end-2026 target anchored by central bank accumulation and eventual easing.

However, if energy prices re-accelerate, the Fed signals no cuts through year-end, and Hormuz disruption deepens, a break below $4,300 opens the door to the low $4,000s.

Discover: The best pre-launch token sales

Advertisement

LiquidChain Targets Early Mover Upside as Gold Tests Key Resistance

Gold’s struggle to reclaim $5,000 raises an uncomfortable question for capital allocators: if the canonical safe haven is down 13% in a month, where does risk-adjusted opportunity actually live?

For us, watching macro dysfunction erode established stores of value, early-stage infrastructure plays with asymmetric upside are drawing renewed attention, particularly those solving real structural problems across fragmented liquidity markets.

LiquidChain ($LIQUID) is a Layer 3 infrastructure project positioning itself as the cross-chain liquidity layer — fusing Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana liquidity into a single execution environment. The architecture centers on four components: Unified Liquidity Layer, Single-Step Execution, Verifiable Settlement, and Deploy-Once Architecture, letting developers deploy once and access all three ecosystems simultaneously.

The presale is currently priced at $0.01445, with more than $630K raised to date, with more than 1700% APY in staking bonus.

For those looking for a gold alternative, research LiquidChain’s presale structure here.

This article is not financial advice. Conduct your own research before investing.

Advertisement

The post Gold Price Prediction: Worst Month in 17 Years fo Save Haven Rock appeared first on Cryptonews.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Pro-Crypto PAC to be Headed by Tether Executive ahead of US Midterms

Published

on

Pro-Crypto PAC to be Headed by Tether Executive ahead of US Midterms

Jesse Spiro, the head of government affairs at stablecoin issuer Tether, will be chairing the organization of a crypto-backed Super political action committee (PAC) to “actively support candidates” in the 2026 US midterm elections and beyond.

In a Wednesday announcement, the Fellowship PAC, a committee that launched in August 2025 and later claimed to have raised “over $100 million” from undisclosed backers aligned with the crypto industry, said that Spiro would become chair ahead of its first political endorsements for the 2026 elections.

The PAC said that it would support candidates in favor of innovation, regulatory clarity for digital assets, and open markets.

”We have an opportunity to ensure the United States remains the global hub for builders, entrepreneurs, and technological progress,” said Spiro. “Fellowship PAC is committed to supporting leaders who understand what’s at stake and are willing to act.”

Advertisement
Source: Fellowship PAC

The addition of a crypto-aligned Super PAC with potentially hundreds of millions of dollars could be used to influence US elections. The Fairshake PAC, backed by Ripple Labs and Coinbase, spent more than $130 million on media buys in the 2024 elections, and reported having $193 million ahead of the 2026 midterms.

Related: Crypto awareness tops 80% among young people in UK: Coinbase survey

Fellowship filed a statement of organization with the US Federal Election Commission (FEC) on Aug. 7 and had reported no contributions or expenditures as of Dec. 31. Although the PAC has claimed to have more than $100 million in its war chest, it was unclear at the time of publication who may be responsible for funding the committee.

Cointelegraph did not receive an immediate response to requests for comment by the PAC.

Money from the crypto industry may already have been a factor in US state primaries, which kicked off in March. Although some of the industry-aligned candidates did not win their races in Illinois, there are more than seven months before the 2026 general election, giving PACs like Fairshake, Fellowship, and others the opportunity to sway voters.

Advertisement

A debate on stablecoin yield is still shadowing a congressional crypto bill

Tether, the issuer behind the largest stablecoin by market capitalization, USDt (USDT), is likely to be affected by legislation being considered by US lawmakers in the Senate.

The House of Representatives passed a digital asset market structure bill in July 2025 called the CLARITY Act, which has effectively been stalled in the Senate amid debate over stablecoin rewards, tokenized equities, ethics and other issues.

As of Wednesday, the Senate Banking Committee had not rescheduled a markup on the bill which it postponed in January. It’s unclear if or when the bill could head to the full chamber for a vote.

Advertisement

Magazine: A newbie’s guide to surviving crypto winter