It’s mid-October 2025, and I’m home with my boys, 8 and 5, and my 3-year-old daughter. It’s not yet Halloween, but I feel disguised as someone else. My face is tomato red, inflamed and covered in a severe rash – a side effect of my breast cancer treatment.

My daughter looks up at me; her big blue eyes filled with concern. It physically hurts to smile at her, but it would be more painful for me not to. Her little voice rings out, “Mommy, I want to kiss your boo-boos.” I’m stunned. My face looks so dreadful that I had resorted to wearing a surgical mask outside of the house.

Setting my surprise aside, I kneel to her height. She purposefully takes my flaming face in her small hands, pulling me close. Her soft lips meet my rough, red chin. She pulls back, smiling expectantly.

“Does it feel better, Mommy?”

I’m telling the truth when I match her grin and nod, emotional tears in my eyes. She’d just shown me that love is the purest form of beauty.

When I was diagnosed with breast cancer in early September, we waited to tell the kids anything. Between the first week of school, a barrage of doctor’s appointments and tests, and my mental health matching my physical, all we could do was try to keep normalcy for them.

Once we got through the initial whirlwind, we met with a social worker at the hospital who helped us construct a kid-friendly conversation. I was anxious, but ready to have this weight off my shoulders.

Life had gotten so heavy so fast. On a Tuesday night, we gathered in the living room with ice pops. I curled up next to my husband, my hand instinctively reached for his back, and as we planned, he did the talking.

“We want to share something with you,” he said. “Mommy recently found a bump under her arm. She went to the doctor, and they know exactly how to make it better. She’s going to be taking a really strong medicine to make it go away. We just want to let you know because she might feel extra tired or not feel well after the medicine.”

Only our oldest son spoke.

“Why are you telling us this?” he plainly asked, seemingly completely reassured that everything was going to be fine. Our middle son and daughter seemed to feel the same, evidenced by nothing other than their happy slurp ups of ice pop juice.

I found myself staring at my daughter – my baby. She was in daycare only part-time, so she was at home with me the most. I wondered sadly how she would manage the changes to her Mommy, but I knew I would do everything I could to continue showing up as the Mommy she loves.

My cancer treatment, notorious for causing physical changes, began a few days later.

My initial treatment plan included infusions – chemotherapy and other targeted medications – every three weeks for 18 weeks. I scheduled them for Fridays because I was told side effects usually start about three days post-treatment, which meant that I would probably feel well enough over the weekend. I wanted the kids to be in school when I was at my sickest.

As expected, Monday and Tuesday were always the most brutal, but it was usually at least five days of steady fatigue, nausea and stomach issues, among other side effects, like mouth sores and neuropathy, that would come and go. While my physical strength decreased, I grew a new mental muscle that enabled me to mostly hide how I was feeling from the kids.

At first, there were few changes to my appearance. I lost a little weight. My eyes gave away a newfound tiredness. It wasn’t until about 10 days after my first treatment that there was a truly noticeable change – the severe face rash, which was also all over my back and scalp. I explained to my questioning kids that it was caused by the strong medicine and reassured them that it would go away. Luckily, antibiotics, a steady stream of topical creams, and, of course, my daughter’s kisses, helped it heal.

My hair started to fall out next. I religiously scalp-cooled – a process in which the scalp is cooled with a cooling cap before, during, and after chemotherapy treatment to try to prevent or reduce hair loss – at every treatment, but knew the success rate varied.

A few weeks after my first cycle of chemo, nests of long, dark hair came out with every hair comb. I hid them under paper towels in my bathroom bin because I didn’t want anyone to see them, and because I was also afraid of seeing what I’d lost again.

Following my second cycle of chemo, after an uncomfortable cold hair wash in the shower, two large bald spots appeared on the top of my head. It was time to get a wig. My best friend had already researched places to buy them, and when she received my panicked text message, she set up the consultation while I stared at someone else in the bathroom mirror.

In the meantime, I had to confront this new reality with my daughter, who loved to comb and play with my hair. I covered the bald spots with various head coverings and told her Mommy had boo-boos on her head. I said she would have to wait to touch my hair until they were better. She wanted to kiss these too. I bowed down.

“Does it feel better, Mommy?” she asked again, after. Of course it did.

When the wig came in, I wore it home from the salon. I introduced it to my kids as extensions – extra hair to make my normal hair look bigger and healthier. My daughter told me I was beautiful.

I lost my eyebrows sometime after the fourth treatment cycle, but my daughter never raised her own. She continued to tell me I was beautiful – more than she ever had.

I mused to my husband about what an intuitive child she was. Every day, she would grab my face, put her nose to mine, and tell me she loved my face, my hair, my eyes, and my heart. She’d end this ritual with a kiss to my heart and tell me it was sparkly, and pink and purple, like her own.

I’d squeeze her tightly, thank her, and tell her how good she made me feel. The ease with which she accepted my physical changes – and still found me beautiful – truly coloured my heart.

Still, I experienced more changes. I grew more fatigued with each treatment, and persistent bags lived under my hollowed eyes. The highest wave of exhaustion would hit around 7pm, the start of my daughter’s bedtime routine.

My husband took over reading all the bedtime stories while I lay on the floor next to them, listening but often dozing. Giggling that Mommy was falling asleep, my daughter would bring me pillows from her bed and curl up next to me to listen to her stories.

My husband started a new ritual of having the children put me to sleep after story time. I’d melt into my bed, and my daughter would happily whisper, “Goodnight, Mommy,” and turn off the light. I’d gratefully close my eyes, but always sneak a peek of her beaming as the door gently shut. She not only put me to bed, but she also put to bed any fears I had about her love changing.

My love for my daughter, in the form of my smile, laugh, words and affection, was beautiful to her. So, I was beautiful to her, no matter the boo-boo.

As adults, we don’t kiss each other’s boo-boos, but when we recognise and reflect love as the purest form of beauty, I think it’s like what my daughter did – a kiss to the heart.

For now, literal kisses to any part of my chest have to wait, as I’m recovering from my double mastectomy surgery. It’s the biggest physical change – and loss – so far, and yet all I can think about is what I’ve gained.

At the top of the list is a lesson on love from my daughter – a real-time representation of the mother-daughter bond, and a new perspective on parenting.

I learned that a young child’s instinct is to love the person, regardless of the physical – something we adults often forget. My daughter taught me to look deeper, soul-level, in all of my relationships – current and future ones. This experience changed my first instinct on how to define beauty. From here on out, it’ll always be led by love.

Parenting through all of this has been scary, exhausting and traumatic, which should be easy to understand. But it has also felt brave, effortless and healing. Brave because going through the chaos of cancer required full-bodied courage, from my reassuring smiles to my confident answers to my children’s questions, to willing my tired body to do school drop-offs, pick-ups, and everything in between. It felt brave to show up with strength in any way that I could.

It’s felt effortless because the love I feel for my children is effortless, and it was magnified by the thought of it being taken away if I was taken away. Even with the physical hardships, there was a newfound feeling of ease associated with my parenting. Loving them and being there for them felt like the easiest thing in the world, alongside going through what felt like the hardest thing in the world.

Finally, as I literally heal from the effects of my cancer, it has felt healing to parent as a new version of myself – softer, stronger and more present. I always believe we can grow as parents and people, and this version of motherhood, and myself, feels like a wholeness cancer can’t ever destroy.

I’ve been a cancer patient for over half a year, and the care I’ve received from my medical team saved, and changed, my life. I’m grateful for everything they’ve done for me and my family. However, the “care” I’ve received from my family – and the love my daughter has doled out simply because it’s what her soul tells her to do – has changed my life, too.

Lauren Joy Doll began freelance writing after her breast cancer diagnosis in September 2025, and her first essay was featured in Newsweek. She’s a communications professional working for a New York City-based nonprofit that organizes the TCS New York City Marathon. Lauren is a lifelong runner and found a love for adult gymnastics at age 40. She resides in central New Jersey with her husband, Keith, and three young children.

Do you have a compelling personal story you’d like to see published on HuffPost? Find out what we’re looking for here and send us a pitch at pitch@huffpost.com.

You might have been disappointed to hear that Jesse Eisenberg won’t reprise his role as Mark Zuckerberg in the upcoming sequel to The Social Network (director Aaron Sorkin certainly seems to have been).

Sorkin previously told Vanity Fair that Jesse “simply did not want to be conflated with Mark Zuckerberg anymore, that he has his problems with the guy.

“He doesn’t like kids coming up to him in airports with business cards that say ‘I’m CEO, bitch’ for him to sign.”

In a new interview with Variety from Sunday, 18 June, Jesse gave his side of the story.

Eisenberg, who received an Oscar nomination in 2011 for his depiction of the Meta CEO in the first movie, said at the premiere of Minions & Monsters that he’d had conversations with Sorkin about coming back.

“We talked about doing the movie for several days. The way [director Aaron Sorkin] speaks, he speaks so wonderfully, as he writes that, in a way, if you’re not going to do something with him, it feels almost like you’re letting down America,” he told the publication.

“I just told him I’m moving in different directions in my life, and you know, what he said sums it up nicely. I don’t want to be associated with that character, but all of my reasons for not wanting to do the movie have nothing to do with how wonderful the movie is, and will be, and I’m sure is already.”

The director previously claimed he’d spent three days trying to win the actor back for The Social Reckoning, which follows the first movie.

It’s not the first time Jesse has spoken about his former character.

In 2025, he said he couldn’t “justify or defend” Mark Zuckerberg after the CEO made the decision to scrap the fact-checking system on Meta’s platforms.

Zuckerberg will be played by Succession’s Jeremy Strong in The Social Reckoning instead.

Its release date is 9 October, 2026. You can watch the trailer below.

We hope you love the products we recommend! All of them were independently selected by our editors. Just so you know, HuffPost UK may collect a share of sales or other compensation from the links on this page if you decide to shop from them. Oh, and FYI — prices are accurate and items in stock as of time of publication.

If there’s one thing I’m awful at doing (apart from laundry) it’s remembering to track my workouts. I got to the gym two to three times per week, but every time it simply slips my mind to write down what I’ve done.

It’s a trait I find myself endlessly ruminating over every time I remember, but obviously not enough to do anything about it.

That’s why, when I discovered Huawei had released a new fitness watch, I knew this could be my opportunity to change.

Now, I’ve tested fitness devices before, but none of them have ever quite worked for me.

I often find they prioritise active fitness over anything else, or gamify relaxing or sleeping so much that they end up having the opposite of the intended effect and stressing me out.

Fitness trackers also give me awful throwbacks to being scorned by the sternest of school sports teachers, which makes me avoidant and want to exercise even less.

And, I’m sorry, but I don’t need to know that I’ve not been sleeping enough for the whole week because I already know! I’m tired, godammit.

Considering the Huawei website promises that the Watch Fit 5 Pro blends style with ‘smart’, I had high hopes.

Although the watch comes in three colours: black, white, and orange, I went for the white because, well, it’s summer.

You can choose from a range of different coloured straps, including nylon and rubber options, but I went for a simple matchy matchy moment.

After all the boring stuff was out of the way, it was time to sync it with the Huawei Health app. You get three months of Huawei Health+ for free when you buy a watch, which gives you access to a range of workout masterclasses, personalised workout plans and nutritional analysis – or you can choose to stay on the free plan for fewer options.

Downloading the app also lets you customise your watch face – a feature I personally love because it means you can match your watchface to your outfit! I currently have mine on one with a spiky metallic silver heart on a black background to match my silver jewellery, but there are plenty of free and paid options available.

From the get go, it’ll ask for permissions to access your health data, including your heart rate, skin temperature, sleep data, and step count.

Once you’re all set up, you can completely personalise the kind of data you want your watch to give you – as well as other basic features you’d expect from a smart ring, like contactless payments, contact syncing so you can call or text, calendar syncing, timers, voice recording, and features.

Just like other fitness devices, the Fit 5 Pro tracks your essential health data and allows you to set goals for movement and nutrition.

Personally, I’m not bothered about setting nutrition goals because I kind of CBA, crucially, and also I find it makes me obsessive about my eating habits.

However, I do need help tracking my workouts. As someone who goes to the gym two to three times a week, I often forget just where I’m up to with my strength training.

Also – and this might just being a woman at the gym – I find myself doubting whether I’m doing something right.

One thing about the Fit 5 Pro I love is that you can start a fitness training programme to help you keep on track, whether that’s running, golfing, strength training, yoga or pilates.

You’ll also have access to classes with personal trainers so you can check your form. or the watch can be connected with third-party apps like Fiit, Komoot, and URUNN, depending on the kind of exercise you enjoy.

The only downside of this is you’ll need to remember to turn the volume on your watch down, so it doesn’t blast your business to everyone in a five-mile vicinity (read: it’s loud).

If you’re already a pro or prefer to wing it, the watch lets you track any kind of workout you could possibly think of so you can keep an eye on your training times. There is truly an option for everything, down to the nichest of sports – think: belly dancing, hula hoop, bobsleigh, bungee jumping.

But for some of the more popular options like cycling (which I can’t say I do on the reg) it it loaded with state-of-the-art tracking that stops recording when you stop at a traffic light, or draws a custom run route in the shape of a lion (or trophy cup) to keep things interesting.

But it’s not just exercise the watch keeps track of – it also prioritises living a holistically healthy life, which is what would make me more loyal to it in the long run.

As someone who exercises out of necessity, not for the love of the game, I’m not particularly interested in a watch or ring that bullies me into exercising five times a week – I more need something to keep me on track and to offer positive reinforcement throughout the day.

I’m yet to find a fitness tracker that does this better than Huawei. Rather than send me 50 alerts when I’ve not reached my step count, it sends a few notifications to encourage me to keep moving throughout my day.

Plus, there’s even an option for a ‘mini workout’ where an adorable little panda leads you through a series of quick stretches and standing exercises to remind you to step away from your screen every now and again.

I get quite severe eye strain, and also work probably way too much, so this is a welcome feature to keep me grounded.

It doesn’t stop there, though: you can also listen to focus white noise music through the Huawei app, or ask it to run a quick meditation or breathing exercise with you.

One of my favourite features is that the watch tracks your mood throughout the day; while I have absolutely no idea what it bases this information off, it always makes me laugh when I look at the watch face and it tells me I’m in a ‘pleasant’ (or even ‘unpleasant’) mood. Because… thanks?

Of course, it’ll also track your sleep, including your breathing stability, how much deep sleep you get compared to light sleep, and you can listen to sleep music through the app.

Honestly, though, I’ve been sleeping better than ever now that the watch prompts me to walk that little bit extra.

It’ll even prompt you to be social: you can create groups with other Huawei watch users to hold yourself accountable, or share your statistics on social media.

• Looks at your health more holistically than any other fitness tracker I’ve tried
• Can sync to third party apps to deepen your training, and the Huawei app gives you a free trial to most of them
• As customisable as you could like
• The charge lasts for 10 days
• It’s easy to set up
• I love that it doesn’t pester you
• The mini workout feature is really impressive
• Easy to use interface
• It’s social

• The volume is quite loud
• I wish the watch face was *slightly* less chunky
• There are sooo many features it can be overwhelming

Overall, this is the best fitness device I’ve tried. I don’t feel as though I’m being pestered by a perniciously petulant personal trainer who wants me to be the skinniest mini in the room.

Instead, the Huawei Fit 5 Pro encourages you to keep an eye on your holistic health, and encourages you rather than berates you when you’re behind on your goals.

There are no red marks or angry notifications telling you off, and there is plenty built into the app to teach you how to have a healthier lifestyle, whether that’s by exercising, winding down before bed, or taking a break from your desk in the middle of the day.

The fact the interface is easy to use and customisable means it would be suitable for anyone, from a 50+ year old, to a teenager. The price point is reasonable for what it is and, best of all, the charge lasts for up to 10 days, so you really never have to take it off (apart from when you’re having a bath or shower).

I’d recommend this to anyone, from those who are simply trying to level up their lifestyle and be more health-conscious, to hardcore cyclists and athletes.

Singer-songwriter Gracie Abrams has weighed in on the ongoing discourse around Hollywood’s so-called “nepo babies”.

Debates about nepotism in the entertainment industry are nothing new, but the conversation has become much more prominent in the 2020s, thanks in part to a piece in New York magazine about the new generation of A-listers whose parents are already established figures in the entertainment industry.

The “nepo baby” label is one that has repeatedly been levelled against Gracie since her emergence on the pop scene, as her dad is Star Wars filmmaker JJ Abrams.

During a recent appearance on the New York Times’ Popcast, Gracie shared her take on the subject, admitting she thinks it’s “appropriate” that people are aware of the privilege she grew up around.

“The nepo stuff is obviously in the discourse appropriately,” she claimed. “I think about the privilege there and… it’s like, I had a safety net, and that allowed me the ability to experiment and to concentrate.”

She continued: “I had the gift of time to dedicate to doing this thing I loved. I wasn’t growing up afraid financially, and that’s the biggest deal.”

Gracie’s major breakthrough came in 2024 when her album The Secret Of Us spawned international hits like Close To You and That’s So True.

She also served as the opening act on Taylor Swift’s Eras Tour, collaborating with the Grammy winner on the album cut Us.

Outside of her music career, Gracie has also made headlines thanks to her relationship with the Oscar-nominated actor Paul Mescal, with the pair hard-launching their romance at the Baftas earlier this year.

Discussing her relationship during her latest interview, Gracie claimed that being with Paul was “a part of my life that brings me so much peace and joy”.

“I’m not going to pretend like that’s not true, but I also think it’s not like an open-door policy,” she said of the media attention the two have received since they began dating.

Speaking to HuffPost UK previously, etiquette expert and author William Hanson, who paired with Hotels.com to create a Grand Etiquette Hotel guide, shared the worst way to treat hotel staff.

“The height of rudeness is treating staff as though they are invisible, or worse, beneath you,” he shared with us.

“Snapping fingers, avoiding eye contact, or issuing demands without a ‘please’ or ‘thank you’ is quite beyond the pale”.

Hanson explained that includes leaving your room in a “reasonable” state for cleaning staff when you finish your stay. But what’s the etiquette when you’re still in there?

Here, we asked him whether we should vacate the area when it’s due a clean.

The etiquette expert’s answer was pretty definitive: “You should vacate the room while it is being serviced. It is simply more considerate”.

He added, “Most housekeepers will wait until you are out and will always knock and announce themselves first.

“If you are inside and would like the room cleaned, answer promptly, greet
them politely, and make your exit. Linger not.”

And, Hanson stressed, it’s important to leave your room in decent nick throughout your stay, rather than just rushing through it at the end.

“As I note in Rule Five of my Grand Etiquette Hotel Guide… ‘Housekeeping Is Not an Archaeological Activity.’ They are there to clean, not excavate,” he stated.

Yes – Hanson has a “golden rule” when it comes to hotel staff.

“If you wouldn’t speak that way to a colleague, don’t do so in a hotel simply because you are paying to be there. Good manners, one finds, are often quietly rewarded,” he said.

A hotel etiquette study commissioned by Hotels.com found that 90% of Brits think our hotel manners are pretty perfect.

But the same research also found that over a third of us have tried to sneak in an extra guest after booking, and about the same amount say they’ve snuck out breakfast buffet food to eat later.

The following article contains huge spoilers for The House Of The Dragon season three.

The third season of House Of The Dragon has begun.

So far, the new instalment of the Game Of Thrones prequel has packed some serious punches.

Viewers have already seen Rhaenyra Targaryen lose her eldest son Jace Velaryon in a vicious battle.

Rhaenyra, played by Emma D’Arcy, finds out about Jace’s death the episode after viewers do – Jace was her sole heir.

When the mother sees her child’s corpse, she begs his dead body to respond.

In an interview with Variety, D’Arcy shared how tough the moment was to film.

“I think the truth is, for Rhaenyra, it’s an insurmountable loss, and it’s a reality that is too terrible to reckon with,” the actor told the publication.

“So the first feeling, the first instinct, is sort of utter denial and to try to push back against that dawning terrible reality. It was a hard day at work.”

They added that there was “only one scene” they “dreaded filming” in season three – the one in which Rhaenyra attempts to get Jace’s body moving again.

“There’s such a strange part of our job, which is there is a sort of business, this gentle mirror between story and lived experience,” they said.

“And whenever you shoot something like that, it does mean letting go of a really treasured cast member and friend – and added to which, imagining those things is painful.

“And you don’t really have an option but to commit to that, at least for the period that you’re shooting it.”

In a previous interview with The Hollywood Reporter, Harry Collett, who played Jace, said of his death: “It’s such a cool way to go. It’s not just brushed under the carpet. It’s very impactful, in such a great and epic episode.

“What a heroic death he gets to have. It’s not just some boring death. I’m very happy with it.”

He also said he’d been warned about his character’s fate since season one of the show.

“Ryan [Condal, House Of The Dragon’s showrunner] would never do: don’t tell the actor, then get them to the script read-through, and that’s when they find out: ‘What? I’m dead?’” he said.

“Luckily, it’s nothing like that. You find out the fate of the characters when you get cast. Some things may change, but nothing that drastic.”

House Of The Dragon continues on Tuesday on Sky, Now and HBO Max in the UK.

Andy Burnham has outlined his vision for the country in his first major speech since Keir Starmer announced his resignation.

Speaking in front of around 100 supporters, including Labour MPs and regional mayors, Burnham vowed to take the UK – which he claimed is “stuck in a rut” – in a “new direction”.

Though leadership nominations have not officially open, Burnham is widely expected to be the only Labour MP with enough support to replace Starmer.

If no-one else challenges him, Burnham will likely become the Labour leader on July 17 and prime minister on July 20.

But the former Greater Manchester mayor has not been in government for decades and only won the Makerfield by-election earlier this month.

While he has insisted he would stick to Labour’s 2024 manifesto, a question mark still hovers over what his time in No.10 might look like.

Burnham’s speech today was an attempt to close that vacuum around what he might look like as prime minister (for no less than the next ten years, according to the new MP).

Though the PM-in-waiting did not take any questions from the press, here’s what we learned from his speech in Manchester.

Burnham announced that he would commit to redistributing power away from London by splitting the No.10 operation in two, with one office in the north of England.

He said: “No 10 North will be the nerve centre of a rewired Britain.

“It will be the conduit through which we redistribute power and resources across the UK.”

Burnham said his office in the north will support regions across the UK on three tasks: “Reform of essential utilities, re-industrialisation and the regeneration of places.”

It would mean regions could take “greater public control of essential services like water, housing, energy, and transport” in a move away from privatisation.

He said: “Ours is a 10-year mission to raise people’s living standards.

“I know people can’t wait forever for change. I heard on doorsteps in Makerfield how people need a bit extra now to help with rising costs.

“I will do my very best to deliver it, and whilst not taking risks with the public finances, will seek to give Britain some breathing space as soon as I can.

“People need to be able to look forward to a night out or a holiday with the kids. People need hope.”

Burnham said he would bring about the “biggest rebalancing of power our country has seen” by introducing more devolution.

“Let me say this very directly: the days of Whitehall fighting the devolution of power into the regions and nations are over for good,” Burnham continued.

“The whole of Whitehall will now be required to get behind our places and work together with them to make quicker, more joined-up decisions.”

The Makerfield MP said he wanted to introduce power at ground level along with a clear share vision which investors can back and committing to “decent infrastructure” across the country.

He pointed to the work he’s done in Greater Manchester having been the region’s mayor up until earlier this month.

He said he gave “businesses the stability and the confidence to invest, increasing their productivity and adoption of new technology.”

Burnham promised to make sure British-based companies are in a better position to win procurement contracts, too.

Burnham said he would “reach out to other parties” in a “fragmented, disjointed” Westminster if he were to get into No.10.

He also suggested he would avoid using the whipping system to force MPs to back the government in parliamentary votes.

It comes after Starmer was heavily criticised by removing the whip from his own backbenchers after they rebelled against his government.

He said: “I will work hard to change that culture, leading from the front and showing how things can be different, letting MPs be authentic representatives, and not using the whip system to create fear or close down debate, involving more people in the work of the government and drawing on the breadth and depth of talent and expertise our party has to offer.

“While the political direction I set is not up for negotiation, I will build an inclusive team at the very highest level, so that all parts of the party and the country can see themselves reflected and represented in it.”

Burnham promised to oversee the “biggest council house building programme since the post-war period.”

“We will use public land, vacant public land, to reduce costs,” he said. “Let me just take you back to the 1970s.

“When we were growing up here amongst the friends we had at school, there were two things that were the foundations of working class aspiration: a council home, a secure home that was the foundation for everything, and then good technical education.

“Those things have been taken away in the decades since, so no wonder so many young people struggle to make it work… don’t blame them, blame ourselves.”

Burnham said he would end “trickle-down economics” and instead offer “good growth in every British postcode”.

He claimed he would achieve that through the “stability that comes from sound public finances” and the “discipline of our current fiscal rules”.

“The change will be the biggest change in our lifetimes to the way the country is run and it is consistent with the 2024 manifesto,” he said.

“We will create a more streamlined state with a clearer purpose to power up all parts of the country and put a laser-like focus on growth and regeneration, good growth.”

Burnham said he takes Alan Milburn’s May review into youth unemployment “very seriously”, after the former health secretary found more than a million 16-to-24-year-olds are not in education, employment or training.

“We need a complete rethink of how we support the next generation to succeed, and it has to start with the education system.

“The days of a school system configured entirely around the university route will be brought to an end.

“University is great for those who want it, but when are we going to focus on the life chances of those kids who want something different? The country hasn’t done that for a long, long time.

“People have argued over many years for an education system based on parity between academic and technical, and that is what we will build, giving every young person growing up here a clear path into a re-industrialised Britain.”

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Ariana Grande has announced that she’s rescheduling three shows on her current live show due to “safety” concerns relating to the concerts’ production.

The Wicked star is currently in the middle of her first world tour in seven years, in support of her 2024 album Eternal Sunshine.

On Monday evening, she announced that two dates on the US leg scheduled for next month are now being delayed to ensure the safety of those in attendance.

Her show at Brooklyn’s Barclays Center on Sunday 12 July has now been bumped to Tuesday 14 July, while two shows in Boston on Wednesday 22 and Friday 24 July have been rescheduled to Thursday 23 and Sunday 26 July, respectively.

Responding to the news on Instagram, Ariana explained: “We are so sorry for these unfortunate scheduling changes. This was our best and safest option as these challenges with production have come to our attention.

“The utmost important thing to us all is safety, first and foremost, and also making sure you all see the show how it is intended to run. Thank you so much for your understanding and I cannot wait to see you.”

Once the US leg of Ariana’s Eternal Sunshine tour is done in August, she’ll bring the show across the Atlantic, where the European leg will consist of 10 nights at London’s O2 Arena.

“I’m very excited to do this small tour, but I think it might not happen again for a long, long, long, long time,” she explained before hitting the road earlier in the summer.

“So, I’m going to give it my all. I think that’s why I’m doing it, because I’m like, ‘One last hurrah. For now’.”

Before the No Tears Left To Cry singer brings her Eternal Sunshine tour to the UK, she’s due to release her eighth studio album Petal, led by her recent chart-topping single Hate That I Made You Love Me.

Ariana previously teased that her new music is “full of life” and was inspired by “growing” in light of “cold and hard and challenging” life experiences.

The British Board Of Film Classification (BBFC) has unveiled its annual report, which includes the films it received the most complaints for in 2025.

The movie that topped the list was Benedict Cumberbatch and Olivia Colman’s domestic dark comedy The Roses.

Upon its release last year, the movie was met with some backlash due to a scene in which Benedict’s character tricked his wife into eating raspberries, despite her being allergic to them, and withholding her auto-injector medication.

At the time of its release, leading allergy charity the Natasha Allergy Research Foundation (NARF) branded the sequence “dangerous”, “careless” and “offensive”, with the BBFC having now confirmed this was the reason The Roses was its most complained-about movie last year.

“Complainants were concerned that the film made light of a serious condition that can potentially be lethal and that the depiction of the use of an EpiPen was incorrect,” they explained.

“The BBFC does not require medical procedures in films to be portrayed accurately. However, this issue is highlighted in the extended content advice on our website to ensure audiences are informed in advance.”

It should be pointed out that the BBFC received a total of 11 complaints about The Roses, with Marvel’s Thunderbolts* sparking five complaints, as did the latest Knives Out movie Wake Up Dead Man.

A total of 10 complaints were made to the BBFC about the animated fantasy film Demon Slayer: Kimetsu No Yaiba Infinity Castle, from those who felt its 15 rating was too severe, while the 18-rated horror film The Black Phone 2 incited nine complaints for similar reasons.

Meanwhile, a PG-rated trailer for Amanda Seyfried and Sydney Sweeney’s The Housemaid was the source of 25 additional complaints.

The Natasha Allergy Research Foundation previously revealed it had already spoken with producers of The Roses over the scene in question, as well as the depiction of food allergies more generally in the film.

“Withholding life-saving medication in a medical emergency is not remotely funny. To make matters worse, the film depicts an adrenaline auto-injector (EpiPen, Jext) being administered incorrectly, repeatedly. This is factually inaccurate and risks spreading dangerous misinformation,” they said at the time.

“For people living with severe food allergies and their families this type of portrayal is not only triggering, but harmful. Food allergies are a medical condition that can, in an instant, become life-threatening.

“Using them as a plot twist for laughs is careless, offensive, and reinforces harmful myths about allergic reactions and anaphylaxis.”

HuffPost UK contacted representatives for The Roses for comment at the time but did not receive a response.

Davina McCall has claimed she offered her services as a presenter when Big Brother was first rebooted by ITV, but to no avail.

The British presenter is probably best known for fronting Big Brother during its original 11-year run on Channel 4, after which it aired on Channel 5 with Brian Dowling and Emma Willis taking over as its hosts, when Davina made the choice not to return.

More recently, the long-running reality show was revived by ITV, where AJ Odudu and Will Best are its current co-hosts.

However, during an interview on the podcast Business Growth Secrets, Davina confessed she’d initially approached ITV bosses about reprising her role as host.

“I’ve got a secret to tell you actually,” she recalled. “When they started Big Brother on ITV, I put myself forward to present it. And they went with new presenters.”

Even then, she claimed she’d told them: “Look, can I please just be pre-titles, and just go ‘fancy another one?’. But they didn’t want me to do that, and I was like, ‘fuck’.”

HuffPost UK has contacted ITV for comment.

During an appearance on The Chris Moyles Show back in 2023, Davina opened up about why she wasn’t back to present the Big Brother revival.

“I think they wanted to go fresh. New start, fresh start, younger,” she claimed. “I do understand and I think it’s quite a good idea.

“Of course I would have done it, I’m being really honest now. But in retrospect, I don’t think it would have been the right fit for me.

“It’s nostalgic for me. It’s come a long way since I hosted it and I am a different person.”

AJ Odudu and Will Best will be back to present a third season of Big Brother in its ITV era later this year.