Connect with us

Business

NLRB drops SpaceX legal fight over fired engineers citing jurisdiction issue

Published

on

NLRB drops SpaceX legal fight over fired engineers citing jurisdiction issue

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) is reportedly giving up on a multi-year legal fight with Elon Musk’s SpaceX and signaled it will refrain from bringing cases against the company in the future.

Bloomberg News reported on Monday, citing a letter from the board, that it would dismiss a case brought against SpaceX two years ago after the company fired eight engineers who were involved in an open letter that was critical of Musk.

Advertisement

The report cited a letter reviewed by Bloomberg that informed the attorneys of the former employees that a recent opinion issued by a separate agency, the National Mediation Board, that SpaceX engineers fell under its jurisdiction rather than the NLRB’s.

MUSK SAYS SPACEX SHIFTING FOCUS TO ‘SELF-GROWING CITY’ ON MOON BEFORE MARS PUSH

SpaceX

The NLRB determined it didn’t have authority over SpaceX. (Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

Bloomberg’s report said Danielle Pierce, a regional NLRB director, wrote in the letter, “Accordingly, the National Labor Relations Board lacks jurisdiction over the Employer and, therefore, I am dismissing your charge.”

The NLRB’s move follows a court ruling last summer that found the labor regulator’s structure is likely illegal. The case was brought by SpaceX, though other companies joined the challenge.

Advertisement

SPACEX ACQUIRES XAI IN RECORD-SETTING DEAL VALUED AT OVER $1T

Tesla CEO Elon Musk

The SpaceX engineers were fired after participating in a letter critical of SpaceX CEO Elon Musk. (Chesnot/Getty Images)

Last August, the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals based in New Orleans agreed with SpaceX and two other companies that the NLRB’s structure is likely unlawful and blocked the agency from pursuing cases against them.

The National Mediation Board (NMB) has oversight of railroad and airline companies and works to prevent strikes by labor groups across those industries, whereas the NLRB’s jurisdiction covers most other private sector employers and can resolve unfair labor practice charges.

MUSK CONFIRMS SPACEX SUCCESS IN PREVENTING RUSSIAN MILITARY FROM ACCESSING STOLEN STARLINK UNITS

Advertisement
Elon Musk SpaceX

SpaceX founder Elon Musk recently announced the company is focusing on moon missions ahead of Mars. (Michael Gonzalez/Getty Images)

Workers at businesses covered by the NLRB have more protections for engaging in collective action to change their working conditions whether they’re members of a union or not.

By contrast, workers who are under the oversight of the NMB are covered by a different law that doesn’t afford the same degree of protection.

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

Reuters contributed to this report.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Top Insurance Brokers: Bank of America Ranks Baldwin, Ryan Specialty as Leaders

Published

on


Top Insurance Brokers: Bank of America Ranks Baldwin, Ryan Specialty as Leaders

Continue Reading

Business

Heard on the Street Tuesday Recap: More AI Disruption

Published

on

Heard on the Street Tuesday Recap: More AI Disruption

Heard on the Street Tuesday Recap: More AI Disruption

Continue Reading

Business

Oatly’s North America struggles continue

Published

on

Oatly’s North America struggles continue

Company comments on new US Dietary Guidelines. 

Continue Reading

Business

Tesco plans to give under-18s Clubcard access this year

Published

on

Tesco plans to give under-18s Clubcard access this year

Consumer outlet Which? has been campaigning on access to loyalty schemes, calling it a “huge win for shoppers”.

Continue Reading

Business

Sanofi ousts CEO Hudson after stalled turnaround at vaccine giant

Published

on

Sanofi ousts CEO Hudson after stalled turnaround at vaccine giant


Sanofi ousts CEO Hudson after stalled turnaround at vaccine giant

Continue Reading

Business

Bank of America Accused of ‘Reckless Disregard’ in Jeffrey Epstein Sex Trafficking Case

Published

on

Britain's King Charles III delivers a speech from the Throne to open the first session of the 45th Parliament of Canada

A federal judge has ruled that a lawsuit accusing Bank of America of ignoring warning signs tied to Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking can move forward, saying the claims are strong enough to be heard in court.

US District Judge Jed Rakoff said Wednesday that allegations the bank “recklessly disregarded” information about Epstein’s conduct were sufficient to allow a proposed class action lawsuit to proceed.

The decision explains his earlier January 29 ruling that lets alleged victims pursue two key claims against the bank.

The lawsuit accuses Bank of America of knowingly benefiting from Epstein’s sex trafficking and of obstructing enforcement of the federal Trafficking Victims Protection Act.

Advertisement

According to Reuters, the judge did not rule on whether the bank is guilty. Instead, he found that the claims deserve further review at trial, which is scheduled for May 11.

In a detailed 42-page opinion, Rakoff wrote that the plaintiff, identified as Jane Doe, “plainly alleges” that Bank of America provided non-routine banking services that helped Epstein.

According to the complaint, the bank allowed Doe to become a “premier” customer and move large amounts of money, despite allegedly having “every reason to know” Epstein was involved in the transfers and in sex crimes.

Judge: Bank of America ‘Turned Blind Eye’

Rakoff also said Doe plausibly claimed that the bank “turned a blind eye” to media reports about Epstein.

He pointed to questions about “the way large transfers passed in and out of an account allegedly owned by an impecunious young woman.”

The judge added that one bank employee, who previously worked with Epstein at other major banks, allegedly had “direct personal knowledge” of Epstein’s sex trafficking, which could expose Bank of America to civil liability, US News reported.

Advertisement

The lawsuit claims the bank continued doing business with Epstein until his arrest in July 2019 because profits were placed above protecting victims.

Epstein died the following month in a Manhattan jail cell while awaiting trial. His death was ruled a suicide by the city’s medical examiner.

Bank of America, based in Charlotte, North Carolina, said it looks forward to a full review of the facts.

The judge dismissed four other claims against the bank and threw out all claims in a similar lawsuit against Bank of New York Mellon.

Advertisement

In 2023, Epstein accusers reached settlements totaling $290 million with JPMorgan Chase and $75 million with Deutsche Bank. Neither bank admitted wrongdoing.

Originally published on vcpost.com

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Civil service pension backlog 'overwhelmed' Capita, boss says

Published

on

Civil service pension backlog 'overwhelmed' Capita, boss says

Thousands of retiring civil servants have been left without pension payments causing hardship for some.

Continue Reading

Business

AI safety leader says 'world is in peril' and quits to study poetry

Published

on

AI safety leader says 'world is in peril' and quits to study poetry

It comes in the same week an OpenAI researcher resigned amid concerns about its decision to start testing ChatGPT ads.

Continue Reading

Business

Earnings call transcript: Comstock Resources Q4 2025 beats forecasts, shares dip

Published

on


Earnings call transcript: Comstock Resources Q4 2025 beats forecasts, shares dip

Continue Reading

Business

Thousands queue as beauty store arrives on island of Ireland

Published

on

Thousands queue as beauty store arrives on island of Ireland

Almost 2,000 people joined the queue for the opening of a new store in Belfast this morning.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025