Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Politics

HuffPost Headlines 7-13

Published

on

HuffPost Headlines 7-13

!function(n){if(!window.cnx){window.cnx={},window.cnx.cmd=[];var t=n.createElement(‘iframe’);t.display=’none’,t.onload=function(){var n=t.contentWindow.document,c=n.createElement(‘script’);c.src=”//cd.connatix.com/connatix.player.js”,c.setAttribute(‘async’,’1′),c.setAttribute(‘type’,’text/javascript’),n.body.appendChild(c)},n.head.appendChild(t)}}(document);(new Image()).src=”https://capi.connatix.com/tr/si?token=19654b65-409c-4b38-90db-80cbdea02cf4″;cnx.cmd.push(function(){cnx({“playerId”:”19654b65-409c-4b38-90db-80cbdea02cf4″,”mediaId”:”7b116e6c-c831-4f0a-a2a9-f455cb6f4276″}).render(“6a550e1ee4b0107f0db7063a”);});

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

The Best Scaffold Tower Choices for Construction Projects

Published

on

The Best Scaffold Tower Choices for Construction Projects

Choosing the wrong scaffold tower doesn’t just slow a job down. It creates genuine safety risks, wastes budget, and can put a project in breach of the Work at Height Regulations 2005. Construction sites vary enormously in floor space, ceiling height, and the kind of access required. The catch is that not every tower suits every environment, so selecting without proper thought tends to cost more in the long run than taking a few minutes to get it right. Stable platforms. Appropriate sizing. Load capacity that matches the task. These matter.

So here are five types of scaffold tower that work well across most construction environments, from groundwork and internal fit-out through to external façade work.

Aluminium Scaffold Towers

Aluminum towers are the default choice for many construction and maintenance projects in the UK, and with good reason. They are light, strong, and quicker to assemble than older steel alternatives. For jobs where workers need to move access platforms around a site, the lower weight of aluminum can make day-to-day work much easier. For example, Lakeside Hire, HSS Hire, and Speedy Hire are useful options for contractors looking for aluminum scaffold towers in different heights and platform sizes, making it easier to choose a tower that fits the task instead of settling for the closest available option.

PASMA guidelines apply to all aluminum tower use. Workers should be properly trained, ground conditions must be checked, and outriggers or stabilizers should be fitted where the height-to-base ratio requires them. These steps are not optional on a safe worksite. Because aluminum towers can be hired for short periods, you are not tied to long-term costs for access equipment that may only be needed during one phase of the project. That flexibility helps keep budgets sensible without compromising on quality or safety.

Advertisement

Stairway Scaffold Towers

A stairway tower includes an integral staircase rather than relying on a ladder to access upper platforms. This matters more than it might seem. Carrying tools and materials up a standard ladder access tower is awkward, slower, and adds fatigue across a long working day. Stairway towers eliminate that problem. They work particularly well for longer tasks where operatives spend extended time working at height, internal ceiling installation, ductwork runs, and prolonged plastering on high walls.

The stairway design typically results in a wider base footprint than a standard single-width tower. That can limit their use in narrow corridors or tight plant rooms. Open construction floors or external elevations with adequate space? Excellent fit. Some configurations allow the staircase to be positioned on either side of the tower, which helps adapt to site constraints. For projects with strict manual handling policies, stairway towers are often the right specification.

Narrow-O (Camlock) Scaffold Towers

Narrow-O towers, sometimes called Camlock towers after the proprietary locking system many manufacturers use, are designed for restricted-access situations. The platform width is smaller than a standard double-width tower’s, which makes it practical in corridor work, between machinery, or in spaces where a full-width tower simply won’t fit. Construction projects that include mechanical and electrical installation in tight plant rooms or stairwells tend to specify this type frequently.

Don’t mistake the narrow footprint for weakness. Properly stabilized with outriggers, a Narrow-O tower is stable enough for most light-duty tasks at relevant working heights. The load-bearing capacity is lower than that of a full-width counterpart, so you’ll want to check that tools and operatives together don’t exceed the platform’s rated safe working load. Manufacturers generally specify this clearly, and any reputable hire supplier will confirm the limits before dispatch. This type of tower covers a wide range of internal construction tasks without requiring significant space overhead.

Advertisement

Folding Low-Level Platforms

Not all the best scaffold tower choices for construction projects involve working at significant heights. A large proportion of construction tasks sit in the 1 to 3 meter working range: installing partition walls, fitting light fittings, taping and jointing plasterboard at ceiling level, or accessing elevated pipework. Folding low-level platforms, podium steps, or folding work platforms handle these jobs well. They set up in seconds. They fold flat for storage. And they don’t demand the assembly time of a full tower system.

Safety standards for low-level platforms have tightened in recent years. BS EN 131 ladder standards and the PASMA low-level access guidance both apply here. One distinct advantage of a folding platform over a stepladder is the guardrail; operatives can work with both hands free and don’t risk overreaching. Overreaching from an unsupported ladder is one of the most common causes of falls from height on construction sites, so removing that risk for lower-level tasks is genuinely worthwhile.

Double-Width Scaffold Towers

A double-width tower provides the largest working platform of the standard tower range. The extra platform area lets operatives work side by side, store materials at height, and reduce the number of trips to ground level. For external brickwork, window installation on multi-storey projects, or any task where two tradespeople need to work simultaneously, the double-width configuration is a straightforward choice. The wider base also improves stability at greater working heights, which reduces the frequency with which stabilizers need repositioning as work progresses along an elevation.

And because the platform is larger, it can accommodate more equipment at any one time. Brick. Mortar. Fixings. Power tools. All of it can sit on the platform together, which keeps the workflow moving. The trade-off is weight and assembly time. Double-width towers are heavier to move and take longer to put together and dismantle. On long-duration projects, that’s rarely a problem. For short-duration work where the tower needs to shift position multiple times a day, you might want to consider whether a narrower configuration suits the rhythm of the job better.

Advertisement

Conclusion

The best scaffold tower choices for construction projects depend on three things: the working height required, the space available on site, and the nature of the task at hand. Aluminum standard towers handle the majority of construction site requirements well, but stairway towers, narrow configurations, low-level platforms, and double-width options each solve specific problems that a single tower type can’t address. Match the specification to the job; check the load ratings; make sure everyone who assembles or uses the tower has the relevant training. Getting those details right keeps work at height safe and keeps projects moving on schedule.

By Nathan Spears

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

13 Basket Bags To Shop If You’re Nonnamaxxing This Summer

Published

on

13 Basket Bags To Shop If You're Nonnamaxxing This Summer

We hope you love the products we recommend! All of them were independently selected by our editors. Just so you know, HuffPost UK may collect a share of sales or other compensation from the links on this page if you decide to shop from them. Oh, and FYI — prices are accurate and items in stock as of time of publication.

Whenever I saw someone with a basket bag as a child, I’d think: ‘why are they carrying their shopping bag around with them everywhere?’.

That tells you everything you need to know about me as a child, and shows you just how far I’ve come (okay, growth!).

This year, I simply can’t stop nonnamaxxing. From my furniture, to my meals, and even my clothes, I simply must embody the spirit of a chic mediterranean woman wafting through a market at all times – whether I’m at work, at the pub, or going to the shops.

Advertisement

It makes complete sense – we’re experiencing one of the hottest summers on record, and I can barely leave my house without breaking into a severe sweat.

Not to mention it’s too hot to eat anything other than picky bits. Hence, my nonnamaxxing sensibilities have finally found their way into my accessories, too.

I’ve been seeing basket bags wherever I look, and these are the 13 tempting my wallet as we speak. Payday could never come quicker.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Richard Tice Praises Commons Speaker After Zia Yusuf Criticism

Published

on

Richard Tice Praises Commons Speaker After Zia Yusuf Criticism

Reform UK deputy leader Richard Tice described Commons Speaker Lindsay Hoyle as “brilliant” just hours after his party colleague Zia Yusuf branded him “a coward”.

The pair appeared to be at odds over Hoyle’s approach to keeping MPs safe in the wake of the death of Ann Widdecombe.

The former Tory minister, who became a Reform spokeswoman, was found dead at her home in Devon on Thursday.

A 28-year-old man has been arrested on suspicion of murder and counter-terrorism police are now leading the investigation.

Advertisement

Widdecombe’s death has led to claims by Reform politicians that not enough is being done by the authorities to keep them safe.

Yusuf, the party’s home affairs spokesman, said on Sunday parliament, the government and the police do not “care at all” about their MPs’ safety.

That sparked an angry response from Commons officials, who insisted “all MPs are offered appropriate security measures”.

It is also understood that Lindsay Hoyle spoke directly to Lee Anderson, Reform’s chief whip, about Yusuf’s remarks.

Advertisement

But in an angry rant on X on Monday, Yusuf hit back: “Lindsay Hoyle, the Speaker of the House, has no jurisdiction over me. I am not afraid of him.

“He is a bully who did not even reply to a letter from a female Reform MP pleading for assistance with security until after I revealed it. If this is not true then I invite him to deny it on the record rather than try and bully the very people he has let down.

“Instead he briefs the press like a coward. He is a disgrace to his office.”

But in an interview with BBC’s Newsnight programme hours later, Richard Tice paid tribute to the Speaker’s attempts to protect MPs.

He said: “I had discussions with the Speaker in early January, including a letter when I said I feared something terrible and potentially fatal might happen.

Advertisement

“And the Speaker has been brilliant. His resolute determination about ensuring the security of all MPs is robust. But I’m afraid under him, we have found failings, we have found wantings.”

Meanwhile, Reform leader Nigel Farage has accepted an offer by home secretary Shabana Mahmood to meet the body responsible for organising security for public figures.

Reform has said it is now paying for round-the-clock security for their MPs.

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Researchers Just Found A ‘Rewind Button’ For Muscle Ageing

Published

on

Researchers Just Found A 'Rewind Button' For Muscle Ageing

Research has already shown that exercise can help us to live longer – and we’ve written before about the 14 hallmarks of ageing that regular exercise helps to slow down.

Now, a new paper published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) has identified the biological “rewind button” that helps physical activity reverse or prevent age-related muscle loss (sarcopenia).

In this study, researchers found that exercise seems to restore a key balance in muscle cells that gets disrupted as we age.

Why does exercise help to reverse muscle ageing?

Advertisement

Healthy muscles rely on a growth pathway called mTORC1, which is in charge of protein production and tissue maintenance.

But when we age, this pathway becomes overactive, offering too many muscle-building new proteins without clearing away the old, damaged ones. We’ve known for a while that this buildup of damaged proteins leads to greater muscle weakness, but we weren’t sure why it happened.

This study showed that a gene called DEAF1 may be responsible.

When they artificially raised the levels of DEAF1 in mice and fruit flies, they found that the mTORC1 imbalance linked to greater muscle ageing kicked in.

Advertisement

Usually, DEAF1 is kept in check by regulatory proteins called FOXOs. These seem to decline over time, though exercise looks like it could rewind that process.

The study’s lead author, assistant professor Tang Hong-Wen, from the Cancer and Stem Cell Biology Programme at Duke-NUS, said: “Physical activity activates certain proteins which lower DEAF1 levels, bringing the growth pathway back into balance.

“This allows ageing muscles to clear out damaged proteins, rebuild themselves properly, and help them stay stronger and more resilient.”

There’s a caveat, however.

Advertisement

In some older muscles, DEAF1 levels are so high, and/or FOXO production is so impaired, that exercise alone can’t reverse the damage linked to ageing.

The study authors think that adjusting DEAF1 levels in people with ageing muscles may help to mimic the effects of exercise, even among those with limited physical activity.

The change might act as a “rewind button”

The study’s first author, Priscillia Choy Sze Mun, said: “Exercise tells muscles to ‘clean up and reset.’

Advertisement

“Lowering DEAF1 helps older muscles regain strength and balance, almost like hitting the rewind button. With millions of older adults at risk of muscle decline, understanding DEAF1 could lead to new ways to protect muscles and improve quality of life.”

And Professor Patrick Tan, Senior Vice-Dean for Research at Duke-NUS (whose researchers were involved in the study) said: “This study helps explain, at a molecular level, why ageing muscles lose their ability to repair themselves and why exercise can restore that balance in some individuals.

“By identifying DEAF1 as a key regulator in this process, these findings may lead to new ways in which the benefits of exercise can be brought to societies with rapidly ageing populations.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Peter Franklin: Yes, there is a moral case against taxing wealth

Published

on

Peter Franklin is an Associate Editor of UnHerd.

Say what you like about the wealth tax advocate Gary Stevenson — and just about everyone has lately — but, at least, he’s been willing to face his adversaries.

He interviewed some of them in his Channel 4 documentaryHow to Get Filthy Rich with Gary Stevenson. I wish certain other high profile “activists” were as upfront and open to scrutiny.

Nevertheless, it can’t be denied that Stevenson has come off worse from the experience. Naturally, his central argument — for a 2 per cent annual tax on assets totalling over £10 million — attracted criticism from the right. But more damaging was the reception from the left. Lucy Mangan of The Guardian gave Stevenson’s documentary a two-star review. It’s presenter was “left floundering” by the critics he interviewed, she said. Another critic, the tax expert and longtime Labour Party member, Dan Neidle, was also unimpressed. Here he is, in his interview with Stevenson, painfully exposing the basic flaws in his big idea.

Advertisement

Of course, one needn’t possess Neidle’s forensic knowledge of the tax system to understand why the proposal — or anything close to it — wouldn’t work.

In a global economy, capital doesn’t sit still. It moves to where it attracts the highest returns and/or is subject to the lowest taxes. No one with a good accountant is going to keep an asset in a country where the government simply confiscates 2 per cent of its value each and every year. At least, not unless the asset appreciates in value by a sufficient margin over the annual tax rate — which is likely to bias the deployment of capital towards short-term speculation instead of the long-term investment that our economy desperately needs.

The practical problems with the Stevenson tax don’t end there. But rather than shoot fish in a barrel, I’d like to tackle a more difficult — and fascinating — aspect of this debate. It’s articulated by the Blue Labour MP, Jonathan Hinder:

“The Right’s response to a wealth tax is always “but it won’t work!” What I find interesting is that there is rarely an attempt to argue against it on moral grounds…”

Advertisement

As it happens, James Cleverly responded to Hinder’s tweet, making the point that that “it won’t work” is a moral argument. One needn’t agree with Tony Blair’s claim that “what’s right is what works” to see that “what doesn’t work, isn’t right” — not when other people’s time and effort is at stake. But let’s steel man Hinder’s argument by assuming that a new wealth tax would work — by which I mean raise a significant amount of revenue for the public purse without killing the golden goose.

In such a scenario, is there still a moral problem with taxing wealth? Or to make the question even harder — isn’t it obviously better than, say, taxing earned income? Framed that way, wealth taxation doesn’t just find support on the left, but from many centrists too — and even a few right-wingers (I could name names, but won’t).

Before going on, let me clarify that I’m not just talking about wealth-taxing the super-rich. Stevenson’s proposal applies to asset totals exceeding £10 million, but you can bet that any serious shift towards wealth taxation would start hitting much lower thresholds. Andy Burnham’s people are already floating the idea of reducing the Mansion Tax threshold from £2 million to £1.5 million. We can see where this is heading. For his part, Jonathan Hinder wants a “a proportional property tax” — and I’ve little doubt that proportionality would mean punishing cash-poor pensioners for the crime of living in a nice-ish house in the South East.

It’s a fundamental principle of progressive taxation that the amount asked for should be related to the ability to pay. That’s why modern tax systems focus on income (and its close proxy, consumption) not wealth. Indeed, from a conservative point of view, the best argument against libertarian claims that tax-is-theft is that tax is a commission on everything that a well-governed country does to enable its inhabitants to earn money. By contrast, demanding money from someone merely on the basis that they own something (which they’ve paid for out of already-taxed income) isn’t a commission, it is confiscation.

Advertisement

Of course, there’s the counter-argument that such taxpayers are nevertheless able to pay because assets can be sold to settle the bill. That may mean forcing people out of their homes, but to a certain kind of “rational” liberal, this is offset by the more efficient allocation of housing stock that supposedly results. On the other hand, to a conservative, it is a violation of the home and of family life — and, therefore, objectively evil.

Ah, but what about the aBaird increase in the value of these sacred suburban semis over the last fifty years? Why are the pensioners I want to protect from expropriation morally entitled to that?

Let me reply in three ways:

Firstly, property inflation in this country is indeed ridiculous, yet from the point of view of a long-term home owner it is still the same house. It’s paper value is, in most circumstances, notional and the lived experience of “wealth” unchanged. Secondly, many forms of wealth tax — like the Mansion Tax — take no account of the capital gain or loss: someone who bought a taxable property yesterday pays the same as someone who was lucky enough to buy an identical residence decades ago. And, thirdly, far from fixing the housing crisis, which is a crisis of affordability, a shift to taxing wealth would give politicians a perverse incentive to keep it going.

Advertisement

While we’re on the subject of perverse incentives, let’s look at another moral hazard that comes with wealth taxation:

By now, we’re all too familiar with the concept of public borrowing as a tax on future generations. It allows politicians today to buy votes with money that our children and grandchildren will have to pay back. No doubt you see the problem with that. Well, I’d argue that wealth taxation is its mirror image i.e. it is a tax on the past. I’ll explain:

Wealth“, for most people, is literally what the taxman has previously allowed us to keep from our earnings minus what we had to (or chose to) consume. It therefore represents the willingness and ability of past governments to a) restrain their spending b) hold down the cost of living and c) encourage the citizenry to build-up capital. These, surely, are things that our leaders should be encouraged to strive for. In this regard, the trouble with wealth taxation is that it allows incumbent governments to leech off the responsibility of their predecessors. It’s the equivalent of raiding a sovereign wealth fund to bankroll profligate spending — only, in this case, the fund is owned individually by the people, not the state.

It’s another reason why a tax base consisting of current income and consumption is greatly to be preferred: because it directly incentivises serving governments to foster ongoing growth and prosperity instead of strip-mining past achievements. To put it another way, ministers should be farmers, not scavengers.

Advertisement

OK, that’s my argument against wealth taxation in general. But what about the billionaire problem? Is it fair that they should be able to get away with effective tax rates below those paid by the rest of us?

Absolutely not, but the solution isn’t crude wealth taxation — not least because the mega-wealthy are those best-placed to take their money elsewhere. Better then to recognise this reality and develop the capacity of government to do deals on a case-by-case basis

In this respect, HMG isn’t entirely without cards to play. Holders of great wealth, whether individuals or corporate entities, have a problem: their money doesn’t exist in the abstract, it has to go somewhere. In that respect, the UK is an attractive destination — not least because we’ve yet to indulge (much) in the self-cannibalisation that is taxing wealth.

Instead, we need to be bolder in the way we influence where global capital flows to in this country and the impact it has while it’s here. For instance, there’s a world of difference between investing in the UK-based industries of the future and outbidding first-time buyers for new housing stock. One creates the good jobs that Britain needs, the other a new class of serfs (not to mention, a generation of voters for the left).

Advertisement

These are qualitative — and, I would say, moral — distinctions that a wealth tax cannot capture.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

The Hot Weather Bedtime Mistakes You Might Be Making With Your Kids

Published

on

The Hot Weather Bedtime Mistakes You Might Be Making With Your Kids

If your family’s sleep routine has gone straight out of the window these past few weeks, welcome to the (very tired) club.

In fact, a new survey by vitamin brand CapyChews found almost half of parents (48%) said their child’s sleep worsens during hot weather, a figure which rises to a mammoth 71% when it comes to parents of four-year-olds.

I can attest: sleep has been especially hard to come by in my household of late – the week where we also experienced high humidity and red health alerts was particularly tricky, with the little ’uns not falling asleep until almost 10pm most nights. (As you can imagine, the following mornings were super fun!)

Why is it so hard to sleep in hot weather?

Advertisement

The ideal room temperature for the human body to sleep is around 18-20°C, according to the Sleep Foundation.

But the recent bout of hot weather has taken bedrooms way past that – and if our bodies can’t cool down, it’s a lot harder to drift off and stay asleep.

You might’ve been aiming to get the kids in bed earlier than normal owing to just how exhausting these heatwaves can be, but baby and child sleep consultant, Andrea Grace, suggested this is a common bedtime mistake parents make.

“While early bedtimes are usually recommended, a bedtime that comes before a child is genuinely ready for sleep can make falling asleep harder – and your child’s bed can become associated with wakefulness,” she explained.

Advertisement

“In these cases, a later bedtime for a few nights can help. Once your child is falling asleep easily, bedtime can be gradually moved earlier until you find their ideal sleep time.”

Rosey Davidson, a sleep consultant and founder of Just Chill Mama, agreed that bringing bedtime earlier won’t necessarily have the intended outcome – even if your kids seem more tired during the day.

“If bedtime is consistently before a child is actually ready for sleep, it can lead to longer periods of lying awake, frustration, and bedtime becoming more of a battle,” she said.

Noting that the heat makes it harder to fall asleep, she added that it “won’t cause any harm” if kids have later nights when it’s really hot.

Advertisement

Other bedtime mistakes to avoid when it’s hot outside

1. Prioritising blackout over airflow

Davidson suggested that during a heatwave, “keeping the room as cool as possible is more important than making it completely dark”.

“If opening the curtains or blinds slightly overnight allows cooler air to circulate, I’d prioritise that,” she said.

Advertisement

“If your child tends to wake early with the light, you can always close the blackout blinds again when you wake early in the morning (for example, around 4-5am) if that helps them settle back to sleep.”

2. Overdressing children for sleep

You might worry your child will get cold overnight, but Davidson warns that overheating is far more likely in a heatwave.

“Keep clothing and bedding light, and follow safe sleep guidance for babies,” she added.

Advertisement

3. Changing the entire routine

If sleep’s gone AWOL, it can be tempting to overhaul the evening routine completely but Davidson warns this could backfire as “children generally cope better with familiar, predictable bedtimes”.

“Keep the routine as consistent as you can, even if sleep takes a little longer than usual,” she said.

“Also do not panic that sleep has hit the rocks! You can work on improving it when the temperature is cooler.”

Advertisement

4. Expecting sleep to look ‘normal’

The sleep expert added that a few disrupted nights during very hot weather are “completely normal and don’t usually mean you’ve created a long-term sleep problem”.

She urges parents to let kids sleep in the coolest room in the house during the hotter temperatures – even if it’s just for a few nights.

“If your baby’s nursery or your child’s bedroom is unbearably hot, there’s nothing wrong with having a family sleepover in a cooler room,” she said.

Advertisement

“For babies, a travel cot is a great option if that room is cooler and you’re following safe sleep guidance.”

Ultimately she wants parents to not panic: “Sleep often settles again once the weather cools. A few difficult nights won’t undo good sleep habits, so focus on keeping your child as cool and comfortable as possible rather than aiming for perfect sleep.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Trump’s Obama Obsession Hits New Low In Wild Rant: ‘Let’s Not Say’

Published

on

Trump’s Obama Obsession Hits New Low In Wild Rant: ‘Let’s Not Say’

President Donald Trump made a string of searing remarks about former President Barack Obama Monday on “Fox & Friends” while arguing that his presidential predecessors all “got tapped along” by Iran.

“If you look for 47 years, they’ve been tapping people along — every president got tapped along, didn’t do anything,” Trump said via phone. “And they became more and more powerful. This should have been done 47 years ago, shouldn’t have been allowed to start. But [former President Bill] Clinton let them go, and [former President George W.] Bush let them go.”

Trump then launched into an attack against Obama.

Calling Obama “the worst of all,” Trump accused him of having gone to Iran’s “side” with his nuclear deal in 2015.

Advertisement

“You know he’s a… well… let’s not say,” the president said, appearing to hold back a defamatory blow. “Let’s not say, let’s leave that for another time. He was terrible.”

Trump’s illusory restraint was short-lived as he quickly went on to criticise Obama further.

“He gave them $1.7 billion in cash, in green cash, put in satchels in an airplane and brought it to Iran,” he continued. “$1.7 billion. Do you know what that is? Did you ever see a million dollars in cash? This is $1.7 billion. It took up an entire Boeing 757, and they flew it to Tehran and they gave it to people that were waiting at a plane. Can you imagine these people? They never saw money, and now all of a sudden they’ve got $1.7 billion in cash. And he gave them hundreds of billions of dollars in cash and everything else, and he went to their side.”

Trump alleged that the Iranians “became much more powerful because of Obama.”

Advertisement

The president also blamed former President Joe Biden, who was Obama’s vice president during the Iran deal, adding that “he probably had nothing to say because he was such a stupid person.”

Trump has repeatedly, publicly insisted that his interim memorandum of understanding with Iran is superior to Obama’s agreement.

Iran received $1.7 billion in cash from the Obama administration, partly as leverage for the release of American prisoners, according to CNN, and also as reimbursement for military equipment Iran purchased from the U.S. in the late 1970s and apparently never received.

The Trump administration’s preliminary agreement with Tehran reportedly includes a $300 billion reconstruction fund, which vastly outweighs the $1.7 billion cash payment of 2015.

Advertisement

Watch Trump’s appearance on “Fox & Friends” below. Skip to the 8:57 mark to hear his comments.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

A Tribune for the upper-middle classes

Published

on

A <em>Tribune</em> for the upper-middle classes

Tribune, long the publication of the Labour left, is launching its summer issue with a talk entitled, ‘What now for the left?’. Featuring Oliver Eagleton, Grace Blakeley, Barnaby Raine and Matt Kennard, the discussion line-up tells us almost everything we need to know before they’ve even opened their mouths. These are not people drawn from the ordinary working-class life that the left once claimed to represent. They are privileged, highly educated, well-connected, culturally confident and, in several cases, come from the protected world of the upper-middle-class left intelligentsia. What possible answer to the question of ‘What now for the left?’ can emerge from such a narrow and resource-rich corner of society? Champagne, caviar and ponies from Daddy, perhaps?

There has always been a bourgeois left in British politics. Tribune itself was founded in 1937 by wealthy Labour MPs Sir Stafford Cripps and George Strauss. And it has long been torn between the views of middle-class socialist intellectuals and the working-class people whose lives form the substance of socialist politics. Old Etonian George Orwell, the great class traitor in the best sense of the phrase, wrote for Tribune. He understood better than most how the English upper-middle class thought about the working class. In The Road to Wigan Pier, Orwell was brutal about the comfortable socialist who liked the idea of the working class more than the reality of working-class people. His advice to the working class was that when the bourgeois communist asks the working class what he can do for it, the answer should be to commit suicide.

The bourgeois left always poses a threat to working-class movements. It doesn’t just join them – too often it takes them over. It arrives with an inherited confidence that comes from an expensive education, professional networks and the time to write, organise, speak and be heard. It then places itself at the front of the movement and slowly replaces class politics with single-issue campaigns, personal grievances and a moralistic, scolding vocabulary that makes the working class feel like an embarrassment in its own house. Why would a class built on undeserved privilege want a politics that exposes undeserved privilege? Better to talk endlessly about everything except class. Better to perform radicalism while leaving the social order intact.

Advertisement

This is a long way from the British left I knew and grew up with in Nottinghamshire. My mum was a trade-union representative in a factory. Her fellow workers’ struggle was also her own. And my dad was a striking miner who knew, instinctively, on day one of the 1984-85 miners’ strike, that the Welsh miners, their families and their communities were his people, too. That was class politics. Not a clever panel of the already connected claiming to speak for the left. Not a performance of outrage. It was a lived practice of solidarity.

We watched out for neighbours. We took bags of coal to elderly people on the estate when their bunkers had nothing but dust in them. We left children’s clothes anonymously on doorsteps so hard-up families were not embarrassed. Call it mutual aid, call it working-class solidarity, call it ordinary decency – it happened without fanfare, without a summer magazine issue launch. The left-wing politics of the working class did not come from philosophy seminars. It came from experience. That is the very thing the bourgeois left does not have and cannot fake.

Advertisement

Enjoying spiked?

Why not make an instant, one-off donation?

We are funded by you. Thank you!

Advertisement




Please wait…

Advertisement
Advertisement

The aims of the working-class left were simple and profound: emancipation from drudgery and poverty. It was concerned with housing, jobs, wages, healthcare, education and the cost of living – the material reality of people’s lives. Working-class politics is steeped in the history of class struggle and class consciousness. EP Thompson’s The Making of the English Working Class remains one of the great accounts of how class is made through struggle, organisation and antagonism. If Thompson were looking at Tribune in 2026, perhaps he would be tempted to write a new chapter entitled, ‘The Exclusion of the English Working Class’.

The new ownership of Tribune sharpens the problem rather than resolves it. In June 2025, the magazine was acquired by E Media Group and placed under the newly formed Tribune Media Group. E Media Group operates Muslim-focussed and independent media brands, including the Islam Channel, an English-language television network launched in 2004 that serves Muslim audiences internationally. Critics have described the Islam Channel’s editorial and religious outlook as leaning toward conservative Islam. Some have accused it of giving prominence to a narrow Wahhabi-Salafi perspective, which leaves limited space for Shia, Sufi, Ahmadi, secular or liberal Muslim voices.

Advertisement

The symbolism of E Media Group’s takeover is difficult to ignore: a historic socialist publication rooted in labour-movement arguments about class now sits inside a media group whose best-known outlet is shaped by a very different set of priorities.

That context matters. The Islam Channel has faced regulatory action from Ofcom, including a £40,000 fine in 2023 after broadcasting The Andinia Plan, a documentary Ofcom found guilty of anti-Semitic hate speech. Earlier Ofcom rulings also criticised the channel for breaches relating to political impartiality and harmful or offensive social commentary.

This is not a small footnote when we are talking about a publication like Tribune. The question is not whether Muslims, religious broadcasters or minority media should own publications. Of course they should. The question is what happens when a magazine that once claimed to be part of a democratic socialist and class-based tradition is absorbed into a media environment where class politics appears, once again, to be pushed aside.

Advertisement

So let us not pretend that the Tribune panel is merely naïve, self-centred or trapped in a bubble of London bourgeois mediocrity, although all of that may be true. What it represents is more serious: it is another small victory for a class that has organised the institutions, language and capital of left politics around itself. The working class has been removed physically, culturally and intellectually from the places where left politics is now performed. Class politics has been displaced by single issues and identity grievances. Those most likely to challenge inherited authority are no longer in the room, and those who remain get to present their own class interests as the universal interests of the left.

What now for the left? Start by asking who is missing. Start with the people who clean, care, build, drive, stack, mine, serve and survive. Start with wages, rent, housing, food, work, heat and power. Start outside the launch party. The left will either return to class politics or become a lifestyle brand for the children of the professional managerial classes. That is the choice. And if Tribune really wants to know ‘what now for the left?’, it should begin not by looking at who is on the stage, but at who has been kept out of the room.

Lisa McKenzie is a working-class academic.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Sen. Graham’s Final Days

Published

on

Sen. Graham’s Final Days

!function(n){if(!window.cnx){window.cnx={},window.cnx.cmd=[];var t=n.createElement(‘iframe’);t.display=’none’,t.onload=function(){var n=t.contentWindow.document,c=n.createElement(‘script’);c.src=”//cd.connatix.com/connatix.player.js”,c.setAttribute(‘async’,’1′),c.setAttribute(‘type’,’text/javascript’),n.body.appendChild(c)},n.head.appendChild(t)}}(document);(new Image()).src=”https://capi.connatix.com/tr/si?token=19654b65-409c-4b38-90db-80cbdea02cf4″;cnx.cmd.push(function(){cnx({“playerId”:”19654b65-409c-4b38-90db-80cbdea02cf4″,”mediaId”:”782dfbed-8367-4d0e-8525-6f9481c77d77″}).render(“6a55625ee4b0107f0db7cd31”);});

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Lindsey Graham’s sister, Darline, will serve out his Senate term

Published

on

Lindsey Graham’s sister, Darline, will serve out his Senate term

Darline Graham Nordone, Lindsey Graham’s younger sister and close confidant, will serve the remainder of the late senator’s term in Washington.

“It’s my honor to ask his little sister Darline Graham to finish his work for him now,” South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster said Monday, formally appointing Nordone after recounting stories of Graham’s legacy.

President Donald Trump and Senate Majority Leader John Thune both publicly expressed support for McMaster choosing Nordone as a tribute to Graham.

Her appointment as an interim caretaker triggers a wide-open race ahead of the Aug. 11 primary. Several Republicans are already weighing bids to take over Graham’s place as the GOP Senate nominee.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025