Politics
Meta used AI to lay off disabled workers
Tech giant and genocide enabler Meta is accused of using AI software to target disabled people for layoffs in a new court case.
In May, Meta announced they would be sacking around 8,000 people. But a new lawsuit claims the company used a combination of AI tools which gathered data on employees’ performance. These include productivity and activity monitoring. Crucially, the scores of those who took more medical leave were reduced because they were at work less.
Meta uses AI to target disabled employees
Twenty-six employees filed the complaint anonymously on Monday, 13 July, in Oakland, California. The complaint explained:
Those tools draw on inputs… that, by design, cannot be accumulated by an employee who is on protected medical or family leave, or whose output is reduced by a disability.
Whilst Meta could’ve excluded those who took more leave on medical grounds from this, they chose not to:
Meta did not neutralize those inputs for protected leave; did not exclude protected-leave-takers or accommodation-seekers from the selection cohort; and did not pause the system for the individualized, leave- and accommodation-neutral review that the law requires.
This means that not only did Meta fail to protect those on protected leave from an AI that doesn’t understand, but they used that system to disproportionately target disabled people.
As the complaint explains:
The result was that employees who took protected leaves were disproportionately selected for layoff, based on scoring that not only failed to account for their protected leaves, but in effect penalized the employees for exercising their legal rights to these leaves.
The plaintiffs are understandably accusing Meta of violating federal and state laws that ban discrimination or retaliation against workers who have disabilities, take medical leave, or are pregnant. They also say Meta’s AI systems weren’t tested for bias, which would be in violation of recently adopted California and New York City laws.
Employees spied on
The lawsuit explains that Meta quietly launched the monitoring program, and naturally, employees had no option to consent:
The program was announced through a low-visibility internal post—made by an engineer rather than a senior leader, in a secondary group rather than Meta’s official employee-notice channel—with little notice and no consent or click-through acknowledgment; on at least some teams, employees received no consent or acknowledgment prompt at all, and, at least initially, there was no way to opt out.
As the Guardian reports, the twenty-six plaintiffs include a scientist who was on pregnancy leave and then parental leave. She found out she’d lost her job two days before she gave birth. Others include a manager who was let go 16 days into medical leave and an engineer who was given a lower score because of time off due to a work-related injury.
The complaint states:
Meta did not assemble the termination list through the considered judgment of managers who knew the work. Instead, Meta used a constellation of internal artificial-intelligence systems …. to score, rank, and select employees for inclusion on the list.
The thousands of layoffs are supposed to start happening on 22 July, but the plaintiffs are seeking a preliminary ruling from the court, which would block Meta from sacking them all while the case is active. They are also applying for relief that could include back pay and reinstatement of their jobs.
Featured image via the Canary
Politics
French far right and loyalists team up for pro-rape hate message
Content warning: This article contains terms of misogynistic and racial abuse, alongside descriptions of sexual violence
The “protectors of women and children” are at it again, proving their credentials once more with a vile pro-rape message daubed on a wall in the loyalist Sandy Row area of Belfast.
The message reads:
Gisèle Pelicot
Salope
Free Dominique
‘Salope’ is a French misogynistic term of abuse that translates as ‘whore’ or ‘slut’.
The revolting vandalism targets Gisèle Pelicot, a French woman whose husband Dominique drugged and repeatedly raped her over a period of 10 years. He invited other men to the couple’s home, who also raped her while she was unconscious.
Gisèle bravely waived her right to anonymity as part of her husband’s trial. In December 2024, a French court sentenced Dominique Pelicot to 24 years in jail for his crimes.
Nearby, racist graffiti had also been sprayed. Without the asterixes, it read:
N*ggers out
P*kis fuck off
Alongside it there also appears to be a crudely drawn star and crescent with a stop sign drawn over it, indicating Islamophobic hate.
Belfast: French racists given VIP treatment in city
The racist and Islamophobic graffiti are sadly par for the course at this point, in a region where overt racism, bleeding into ethnic cleansing, is rapidly becoming the norm. In contrast, the attack on a heroic French feminist icon seems a little incongruous and inexplicable.
However, sources have told the Canary that a group of French racists have recently been given the VIP treatment by local loyalist bigots.
The Ainsworth Drive Facebook account are another group of frauds who tout their eagerness to “protect women and children”, merely as an excuse to vomit out racist, anti-migrant bile. On 9 July, they posted the following:
I have a group of French patriots/activists coming into the area over the 12th period, some are part of the Turning Point movement, the legacy Charlie Kirk left behind.
They wish to speak to local people/parents concerned about the mass enforced movement of immigration being forced into deprived working class areas like Ainsworth/Woodvale.
If anyone wishes to be interviewed, can be off camera and can academically speak well then please drop this page a private message, thank you.
The Canary has previously covered the US-based Turning Point’s intention to make inroads in the north of Ireland. That French racists are now also drawn to the region proves a point we’ve previously made. That is, the extreme chauvinism of loyalism, like that of Zionism, is a huge lure to reactionaries the world over.
The capacity of these two twin settler-colonial ideologies to deploy violence as a means of achieving their supremacist goals also has obvious attraction to would-be ethnic cleansers.
An Ainsworth Drive post on 12 July describes the:
…good company of around 20 french [sic] patriots from Normandy and other surrounding towns in southern France.
Leaving aside the geographic impossibility of the northern French region of Normandy having surrounding towns situated in southern France, the post goes on to boast of a joint mural effort between the groups.
The weird ideology of ‘The Normal Ones’
Activists monitoring the far right identified the French group as attending the Sandy Row bonfire marking the 12 July Battle of the Boyne commemoration. They are believed to be linked to an outfit called Les Normaux, translating as ‘The Normals’ or ‘The Normal Ones’.
According to StreetPress, a French investigative team that track the far right, Les Normaux are:
…a small far-right identitarian group based in Rouen, established in the spring of 2021.
The group fixate on Norman identity specifically and hold a March of the Normans event each year, despite authorities banning it. Far-right actors from across Europe are known to attend.
StreetPress also report Les Normaux are active within “traditionalist Catholic circles”, so it would be interesting to know what they made of the torrent of sectarianism loyalists produced over the 12 July hate carnival.
The French group has previous in terms of hatred directed at women, with StreetPress saying in June 2021 the group:
…disrupted a lecture by elected official Alice Coffin, directing misogynistic remarks at her.
The foolishness of identitarian politics
Many of the group members have taken down their social media accounts since news of the Sandy Row graffiti emerged. However, sources who spoke to the Canary got a look at some of them beforehand.
They told us many previously displayed an enthusiasm for Irish republicanism, presumably mistakenly believing it would embrace the prejudices often found in nationalist ideologies elsewhere. That is rarely the case in republican circles, so the racists seemingly switched to loyalism.
That absurd trajectory, of stumbling hopelessly around for some purist notion of identity, underscores the folly of identitarian politics more broadly.
All human culture, and the movement of peoples that form it, is a process of constant transition. Chauvinists insist on freezing time at an arbitrary point, around an arbitrary group of people, and rule that all who exist outside those bounds must be excluded.
To see the degeneracy that mode of thought produces, one need only look at what was scrawled on the walls of Sandy Row.
Featured image via the Canary
Politics
Israeli occupation commits billions to expand illegal settlements across the West Bank
The pace of settlement advancement in the occupied West Bank is unprecedented. Bezalel Smotrich – finance minister and illegal settler – has long opposed the creation of a Palestinian state. He has now not only called for the complete conquest of the Gaza Strip, but is also promising a settlement “revolution”.
Expansion of settlements will further tighten the occupation’s control
The occupation is actively advancing major settlement and infrastructure projects across the occupied Palestinian territory. According to Peace Now, most of these new settlements are deep inside the West Bank, where there is very little or no Israeli occupation presence. This is how “Israel” tightens its grip on these areas, and how any chance of Palestinian development is prevented.
On 14 July 2026, Israeli occupation ministers celebrated a major new government investment, which they described as a “historic” moment for the settlement movement. It is aimed at accelerating the establishment and expansion of illegal “Israeli” settlements across the occupied West Bank.
The government announced the Security Cabinet had allocated 1.3 billion Shekels – approximately £324 million – in June to advance the establishment of 34 new settlements in the occupied West Bank. This had been approved during the previous three and a half years.
Smotrich and Settlements Minister Orit Strock described it as a landmark step for the settlement movement. In statements, Strock said:
There has never been a Zionist-settlement decision of this size in the whole history of Zionism since it was founded.
Smotrich declared:
We are strengthening the security of the State of Israel, killing the idea of establishing a terrorist state in the heart of the country, and strengthening our hold on the homeland in Judea and Samaria.
Killing the idea of establishing a Palestinian state
Nine of these 34 settlements are planned for the Northern West Bank, seven in the Central region, four in the Hebron area, seven in the Jordan Valley, one in the Jericho region, and six in the Gush Etzion area – a settlement bloc located just south of Jerusalem.
The announcement also mentioned additional funding of 1.075 billion shekels for infrastructure projects, especially roads to connect the settlements. This decision is another step toward permanent “Israeli” control over occupied territory. And it is intended to destroy what is left of a future Palestinian state. This brings the number of settlements in the occupied West Bank, initiated under Smotrich’s four-year period in office, to 103.
The “Israeli” government has also signed a deal worth around 8.5 billion Shekels, or £2 billion. This includes plans for around 12,000 new housing units, plus related infrastructure, in the northern West Bank. The agreement was signed between the “Israeli” government and the so-called “Samaria Regional Council.” It also requires additional legal challenges if a new government wishes to stop settlement construction.
According to Peace Now, this agreement will result in “unbridled construction in the settlements”. It will also:
shackle the next government to commitments that will make it difficult to roll back this terrible government’s reckless policy.
Changing the face of the region
The Israeli occupation says it is aimed at “changing the face of the region.”
Israel has approved a $2.3 billion plan to expand illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank, including 12,000 new housing units and major infrastructure projects pic.twitter.com/8ETmnT58D1
— TRT World (@trtworld) July 14, 2026
Earlier in July, the occupation’s Security Cabinet approved plans for 13 new settlements in the central West Bank.
The proposed locations for these settlements are along the vital Route 60 north-south main road, and will make up one of the largest settlement blocks in the territory. Palestinian officials warn they will sever East Jerusalem from the rest of the West Bank.
The Jerusalem governorate condemned the move, saying it marks “a dangerous escalation”, and aims to create “new geographical realities on the ground.”
Illegal settlement of Giv’at Ze’ev has become the fifth “Israeli” city in the occupied West Bank
Alongside the approval of these 13 settlements is a $350 million initiative that includes legalising and accelerating the development of dozens of previously unauthorized outposts. “Israeli “settler outposts now control nearly a fifth of the territory, and this is now set to increase even more.
In yet another move to strengthen and expand its illegal settlements, “Israel” has also just declared the Giv’at Ze’ev settlement a city. The settlement, which is northwest of Jerusalem, is home to more than 35,000 illegal settlers. It becomes the fifth recognised “Israeli” city inside the occupied West Bank.
The move follows an order signed by Israeli occupation forces (IOF) Central Command chief and war criminal Avi Bluth, whose actions in al-Mughayyir in August 2025 amounted to collective punishment.
The recent surge in illegal Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank has been driven by a combination of factors. Since the return of Netanyahu’s government in late 2022, a coalition of pro-settler and religious-nationalist parties has expanded funding for settlements. It has also accelerated planning approvals, legalised previously unauthorized outposts, and invested heavily in roads and infrastructure linking settlements.
Historically, only the occupation’s military chain of command held authority over Area C. But now, Smotrich is the one in charge of the Settlement Administration and the Civil Administration. This structural shift transfers vast civilian, zoning, and construction oversight from the military to his direct ministerial control.
Settlement expansion will bring more violence and forcible displacement of Palestinians
Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention prohibits an occupying power from transferring parts of its civilian population into occupied territory.
In July 2024, a landmark opinion by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruled that Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territories was illegal. It demanded the evacuation of all settlements and called on states not to support any situations that violate international law in occupied territory.
Expansion of settlements not only violates international law; it also reshapes the landscape, the politics, and the prospect of peace for generations of Palestinians.
Settlements entrench the occupation and fragment Palestinian territory. They also undermine the prospects of a future Palestinian state, with East Jerusalem as its capital.
A new illegal settlement for “Israeli” colonists requires not only roads, but electricity and water systems – and, of course, the occupation’s security and military. Over time, these settlements fragment Palestinian communities and entrench the occupation, while prospects of a future Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital are undermined. In addition, an increase in the number of “Israeli” colonists also increases the systematic violence faced by Palestinians every single day in the West Bank and East Jerusalem.
Unprecedented levels of settler brutality
settler brutality has reached unprecedented levels.
In 2026:
both fatalities and injuries are outpacing figures from previous years.
The sole purpose of this brutality is to forcibly displace Palestinians from their land and ethnically cleanse the occupied Palestinian territory.
As of 10 July, ”Israel” has forcibly displaced over 3,200 Palestinians across the occupied West Bank so far in 2026. That is an average of 17 people per day – double the daily rate over the previous three years. Settler attacks have been responsible for about 75 percent of these displacements.
More than 750,000 Jewish settlers live in these illegal settlements across the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem.
Featured image via the Canary
By Charlie Jaay
Politics
PMQs: Who’s Asking the Questions?
Graham Stuart CON Matt Turmaine LAB David Chadwick LIB Alistair Carmichael LIB Danny Kruger REF Alison Bennett LIB Jerome Mayhew CON Helen Morgan LIB Melanie Onn LAB Will Forster LIB Rachael Maskell LAB Julia Buckley LAB Lola McEvoy LAB Lloyd Hatton LAB Susan Murray LIB
Politics
Tommy Robinson boosts smear campaign against Scottish father
A Scottish father has been smeared online after he stood up to an anti-migration protest in his area. Among those smearing him is the notorious racist agitator Tommy Robinson:
Far right thug Tommy Robinson was one of the highest profile Twitter accounts who pushed this video, falsely accusing this innocent brown British man of filming children in a park and now making him fear for his life.
Any comment @elonmusk? Are you ok with this? https://t.co/d4pJot7tSC
— Mehdi Hasan (@mehdirhasan) July 14, 2026
Smear and loathing
The man Robinson and others smeared was the 43-year-old Quroum Beg – a fourth-generation Scotsman.
Beg staged an impromptu counter-demonstration against an anti-migration protest, which swept through his area. In response, the protesters targeted Beg with racist abuse.
Mr Beg said he was made aware of an approaching demonstration in the nearby streets while he was at the park with his family.
All of those in the park, including Mr Beg, left the area. After returning his children home, he then made his way back to the park to stage a counter-protest.
Beg told the protesters:
I’m not afraid of you, keep on walking
The police advised Beg not to engage with the protest, with the father subsequently walking away to sit on a swing. It was at this point the protesters began accusing Beg of filming children in the park, chanting “get him out”.
In other words, they didn’t like being challenged, and they resorted to the grimmest untruths to attack the man.
Robinson labelled the fourth-generation Beg an “invader”:
The tweet remains up at the time of writing, having gained 141k views. Robinson also has many other posts labelling people of colour “invaders”.
Beg has faced harassment since, telling STV:
These false narratives affect everything people do and their day-to-day lives.
It affects their families and everybody around them. People need to think if sharing these narratives online is something they are proud of.
I haven’t been able to sleep since then. People are sharing things all over the world, so I worry about people recognising me without seeing the full context of what happened around it.
Robinson
Robinson has form when it comes to smearing people of colour to further his fascist, far-right ideology.
Famously, Robinson lost a libel case after he told lies about a Syrian refugee – who was also a child no less, and who had suffered a vicious attack.
Robinson recently lied about his libel loss, which is what you’d expect, isn’t it, because the guy’s a f*cking liar, isn’t he:
While discussing his libel loss over the Syrian schoolboy, Tommy fired off a series of claims that simply don't stand up to scrutiny:
• Tommy says he merely suggested "there was… pic.twitter.com/7LkTQvewoS
— Gadget (@Gadget440) June 23, 2026
Tommy Robinson was allowed to rewrite history completely unchallenged in a friendly interview.
This isn’t even the only person of colour Robinson has smeared this week:
We know the woman in this video (who was rescuing the seagull). So we'd recommend you remove this post and apologise for your anti-Muslim, racist tirade.
* tirade means angry verbal outburst if your followers were wondering https://t.co/dEjOsMhqkT — Canary (@TheCanaryUK) July 10, 2026
As Maddison Wheeldon reported for the Canary:
One of Britain’s self-styled “patriots” shared the video, with many claiming the woman was catching the bird to eat it – parroting the same racist theories that falsely accused immigrants in the US of eating pets.
However, Mubarak was actually doing a good deed in rescuing the seagull that had fallen from a roof. More footage shows her working with other locals – white locals, for the record – to reunite the gull with its mother.
Robinson also incited white riots earlier this year; the sort of thing these ‘anti-migrant protests’ inevitably turn into:
I wrote this – I think he’ll struggle to make a case for his income or reputation being damaged given that his income is reliant on him begging for money on the back of doing racist things https://t.co/qDEz7AnWt7
— Willem Moore (@willem_moore_uk) June 13, 2026
Problem
Tommy Robinson and the racist sh*theads he stirs up are a scourge on this country.
To be clear, people aren’t wrong to feel like Britain is broken; they’re also not wrong to think that they’ve been shafted, or to acknowledge that their circumstances keep getting worse.
They are wrong to blame people of colour for the problems caused by the rich, though. And they’re especially wrong to spread lies as soon as they face any sort of pushback.
Featured image via the Canary
By Willem Moore
Politics
Wings Over Scotland | The Invisible Rabbit
Further to Monday’s letter from the Deputy Chief Constable, we’ve submitted the following Freedom Of Information request to Police Scotland.
———————————————————————-
To: FOI
15 July 2026
This week I received a letter from DCC Stuart Houston. It notes in part:
“During this time, Police Scotland utilised financial investigators, financial analysts and a forensic accountant to fully investigate the circumstances surrounding reported irregularities. Consideration was given to other crime types, such as, but not limited to, those listed in your letter.
These matters were also fully investigated, and all of the circumstances were reported to the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service for advice and guidance.”
As Police Scotland announced that Operation Branchform was closed on 26 May 2026 and is no longer a live investigation requiring confidentiality, and as the matter is of such great public interest – involving as it does the extremely grave matters of public confidence in the Scottish Government and the integrity and independence of Police Scotland and COPFS when investigating potential crimes committed by members of that government – the information I request is therefore as follows:
(1) What advice and guidance was received from the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service specifically regarding the initial complaint about the Scottish National Party’s suspected misappropriation of “ringfenced” fundraiser money (rather than the subsequent offence of embezzlement against the Party for which Peter Murrell was prosecuted and convicted)?
(2) On which date/s was this advice and guidance received?
(3) On which date (an approximate one, eg “August 2023” or “Spring 2022”, will suffice if a more precise one cannot be identified) did Police Scotland cease investigations into the original complaint of misappropriation of funds by the SNP (again as opposed to Peter Murrell’s subsequent embezzlement from the Party)?
(4) Did they do so on the grounds that (a) no crime was identified, or that (b) there had been a crime but the perpetrator/s could not be identified, or that (c) there had likely been a crime but evidence was insufficient for a prosecution, or for some other reason?
In the interests of transparency I can see no justifiable reason for these facts being withheld from the public.
The integrity of the government, police and prosecution service is not a matter of mere curiosity or prurience. It is vital to public faith in national institutions and I will pursue this matter with the Information Commissioner if necessary.
———————————————————————-
We’ll be sending a similar one to the Crown Office, and our solicitor will also be writing to Police Scotland separately. We’ll continue to keep you posted.
Politics
Oyarzabal and Porro fire European champions into World Cup final
Spain are into the World Cup final after a controlled, clinical 2-0 win over France in Dallas.
The semi-final was billed as a meeting of the tournament’s two standout sides, but one which never caught fire for Didier Deschamps’ team. Goals in each half from Mikel Oyarzabal and Pedro Porro settled it, sending the European champions through to Sunday’s showpiece against either England or Argentina.
France arrived with the joint-top scorer Kylian Mbappé and the World Cup’s top assist-maker Michael Olise, but neither could influence a game Spain managed from the opening whistle.
Luis de la Fuente’s side, unbeaten in 37 matches across all competitions, were simply sharper, cleaner and more cohesive. France, by contrast, produced one of their poorest displays of the tournament at the worst possible moment.
Spain took control
The semi-final had been hyped as a heavyweight clash, but Spain settled quicker and imposed their rhythm. Their first breakthrough came at 22 minutes. Lucas Digne, attempting to clear inside his own box, caught Lamine Yamal. The contact was clear, the penalty awarded, and Oyarzabal stepped up to slam his finish past Mike Maignan.
It was a moment that underlined Spain’s composure. Even with France’s frontline on the pitch, Mbappé, Ousmane Dembele, Olise could not trouble Spain. Their midfield combinations were crisp, their press well-timed, and their wide players constantly stretching the game.
France’s response was minimal. William Saliba’s injury on the half-hour, forcing Maxence Lacroix into action, added to their problems.
Spain continued to create the cleaner chances. A slick move on 38 minutes saw Dani Olmo backheel into Yamal, whose cross found Fabian Ruiz. His effort was blocked just wide – another warning for France.
Porro doubles the lead
Spain’s second goal arrived at 58 minutes and reflected the fluency they carried throughout. Porro exchanged passes with Olmo, broke into space, and finished low for 2-0. It was a simple, well-executed move, and it effectively ended the contest.
Three minutes later, Yamal thought he had added a third, bursting through and finishing, but he was narrowly offside. It didn’t matter. Spain were in complete control, and France had still not registered a shot on target.
Olise, who came into the match with five assists in the tournament, was substituted at 72 minutes. His output summed up France’s night. Just two chances created, no completed dribbles, and little influence.
Ferran Torres then headed wide for Spain as they hunted a third, while Unai Simon’s misjudged header gifted Désiré Doué a chance, but the France substitute shot straight at the scrambling keeper.
France’s first meaningful efforts on target didn’t arrive until stoppage time. By then, Spain were already cruising into the final.
Biggest test ends in defeat
Across this World Cup, France had looked complete. Their four-man frontline had been slick and decisive. Their defence had been solid, with clean sheets in all three knockout games before this one. Their depth was the envy of most nations.
Yet in Dallas, they were a shadow of that side. The first half was blunt, lacking tempo and invention.
Usually, France finds a second-half surge, but it never came. The air-conditioned stadium offered no lift, and Spain’s organisation denied them any rhythm.
The performance left France fans dejected. Bastille Day celebrations back home will have felt flat as supporters watched a team unable to produce their usual intensity. Spain were excellent, but this semi-final was defined just as much by France’s failure to fire.
France falls short
Didier Deschamps admitted his side were below their usual level. He pointed to technical errors, misplaced passes, and a lack of danger in attack. For a squad with such talent, it was a disappointing end and a subdued conclusion to his 14-year tenure.
France now head to Saturday’s third-place play-off, a fixture that will feel like a comedown after their ambitions of lifting the trophy.
Spain’s run continues
Spain’s consistency is remarkable. They beat France in the semi-finals of Euro 2024, and again in the Nations League semi-finals in 2025. This win makes it three straight knockout victories over Les Bleus. More importantly, it extends their unbeaten run to 37 matches – a joint-record for a European nation.
Huge praise must be given to Luis de la Fuente and his players, for their commitment, solidarity, talent, and how they make difficult tasks look simple.
This Spain side began this cycle with a clear idea and have stuck to it. The result is a team primed to repeat the Euros–World Cup double they achieved in 2010.
They will take some stopping in New York.
Key moments
- 22 mins – goal: Oyarzabal converts from the spot after Digne kicks Yamal.
- 30 mins – injury: Saliba forced off; Lacroix replaces him.
- 38 mins – close: Olmo’s backheel releases Yamal; Ruiz’s shot blocked wide.
- 58 mins – goal: Porro finishes after linking with Olmo.
- 61 mins – no goal: Yamal scores but is offside.
- 72 mins – sub: Olise withdrawn after ineffective display.
- 79 mins – miss: Torres heads wide.
- 81 mins – error: Simon’s poor header gives Doue a chance; he shoots at the keeper.
Spain sharper, France subdued
Spain’s control was total. Their midfield dictated, their wide players stretched France, and their defensive structure kept Mbappé quiet. Dembélé, Olise and the rest of France’s attack were blunted, unable to find space or combine with any fluency.
France’s technical errors were costly. Passes went astray, transitions broke down, and their usual second-half lift never materialised. Spain didn’t need to be spectacular either; they simply needed to maintain their level. They did exactly that.
What’s next
Spain move on to Sunday’s final, where they will face either England or Argentina. Both opponents present different challenges, but Spain’s form, cohesion and unbeaten run make them formidable.
France, meanwhile, must regroup for the third-place play-off. It is not the stage they expected to be on, and the performance in Dallas will linger.
Featured image via NBC News
By Faz Ali
Politics
Maine Democrats grapple with who is best to take over Graham Platner’s movement
Maine Democrats want to hold onto Graham Platner’s progressive base — but they can’t agree on who is best positioned to carry the torch.
That indecision is creating a fractured field heading into an unpredictable late July nominating convention for one of the most important Senate races on the 2026 map. Now, various candidates are rushing to prove they are the most aligned with Platner’s policies, without tying themselves too closely to the disgraced oysterman.
Labor organizations and the national progressive organizing group Our Revolution are backing former Maine Senate President Troy Jackson, who campaigned with Platner during the primary and got the endorsement of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) for his unsuccessful gubernatorial campaign earlier this year. Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), a former Platner surrogate, is also behind Jackson, as are dozens of current and former state lawmakers.
But some state legislators and local activists who had backed Platner are flocking to Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows, who similarly ran as a progressive in the gubernatorial primary. And former public health official Nirav Shah is touting more progressive policy positions than he did when he ran for governor in an attempt to break off some Platner supporters. Behind the scenes, he is also working to recruit former organizers from Platner’s campaign, according to two people familiar with the strategy and granted anonymity to discuss it.
The trio of former gubernatorial candidates are the leading figures in a crowded field aiming to win over a yet-to-be-selected group of 600 Democratic delegates. Part of that task is convincing Platner’s former supporters that they will carry on the progressive advocacy and fighting spirit that made his candidacy so popular — before he was forced to resign after POLITICO reported a woman said he had sexually assaulted her. Platner has denied the allegation.
Many of the candidates will make that pitch directly during a debate scheduled for Thursday night. And the stakes couldn’t be higher for national Democrats watching anxiously: Unseating Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) is an essential part of the party’s plan to take back control of the Senate this fall.
Platner convincingly won the Democratic Senate primary last month with nearly three quarters of the vote, and had a zealous base of support during the primary. But where his voters and core volunteers go next is unclear.
“People who were vocal supporters of Platner’s have moved to other candidates, and it doesn’t look to me like they moved in a block, that everyone agrees who’s the best next candidate from that movement,” said David Farmer, a Maine Democratic political strategist not involved with the Senate campaign. “And I think that in a truncated process like this, that’s to be expected.”
In just 11 days, Democrats will replace their nominee at a convention in Bangor. This weekend, they will select the delegates who will pick that candidate — a process playing out across all of the state’s 16 counties, with campaigns seeking to recruit and organize delegates who will vote in their favor.
Unions, who were a key Platner booster in his primary against Gov. Janet Mills, have largely gone to Jackson, a logger and longtime union member. The Maine AFL-CIO endorsed Jackson over the weekend, citing his support of workers’ issues in the Maine legislature, along with his track record of winning over rural and working-class voters.
Some of Platner’s biggest supporters in the state House are beginning to coalesce around Bellows, however. That includes state Rep. Valli Geiger, who had been floated by Platner as a potential replacement before she passed on a run. In a Facebook post, Geiger cited Bellows’ track record of standing up to President Donald Trump as secretary of state, along with the fact that she “did not declare as a candidate until after Graham Platner announced he was withdrawing from the race unlike the unseemly rush of so many ambitious men.”
Reached via text, Geiger declined to be interviewed about her support for Bellows.
State Rep. Gary Friedmann, who also previously endorsed Platner, said he is all-in for Bellows. While he agrees with Jackson’s stances and called his association with Sanders and Our Revolution “very compelling,” Friedmann hinted at something Democrats have voiced worry about behind the scenes: That Jackson struggles as a compelling public speaker.
“When it comes to standing up, if there’s a debate with Susan Collins, or the messaging that comes from both candidates, I think Shenna is extremely articulate and compelling,” Friedmann said.
He added: “I think that having a woman to voice that platform is gonna be very important.”
All of the candidates are still figuring out exactly how to capture Platner’s support without tying themselves too closely to him as an individual. A letter circulated by former Platner campaign volunteers that racked up hundreds of signatures as of Tuesday called for the candidate replacing him to adopt a string of progressive commitments on issues including health care, housing and ending “forever wars.” Both Jackson and Bellows signed onto the letter.
During a virtual rally hosted by Our Revolution on Monday, Jackson took time to “acknowledge what everyone on this call has been through” while asking Platner’s supporters to rally behind him, though he never mentioned the oysterman by name.
“I know that there’s real pain, anger, disappointment, and I’m not going to try and to minimize that,” Jackson said. “But look, this movement has always been bigger than one person. It’s about taking on a system rigged against working people.”
Joseph Geevarghese, who runs Our Revolution, called on the movement Platner emboldened to get involved in the delegate process outlined by the Maine Democratic Party.
“This is the perfect opportunity for us to show the establishment that we can organize and win within the system that they created, the Democratic Party process,” he said on the call.
A person close to Bellows, granted anonymity to discuss internal strategy, also acknowledged this dilemma for candidates, calling it “a really delicate dance to walk.”
“It’s not like she’s trying to be Graham Platner or be someone she’s not,” the person said. “She is able to be herself, and I think she, ideologically, is a great bridge for people who were very disheartened by what happened with Platner, but still extremely pissed off about Susan Collins and the Senate majority, and what’s happening in Washington, D.C.”
While Shah’s campaign is recruiting former Platner supporters behind the scenes, the former public health official is also making the pitch explicit in public comments.
“I want all former Platner supporters to know: you have a place in this campaign,” Shah wrote on social media shortly after he launched his candidacy last week.
Maine politics was rocked on Monday by ICE agents’ shooting of a 26-year-old man in Biddeford, with potential Senate candidates rallying around getting the federal agency out of Maine. For many Democrats, it was also a reminder of the importance of supporting the party’s eventual nominee, regardless of who it is.
Democratic State Rep. Morgan Rielly, a former supporter of Platner’s, said he told Jackson that he would support him in the primary. But more important, he said, was the goal of defeating Collins this fall.
“[The Democratic nominee] will have my full support and I will be working hard to get them elected,” Rielly said in a text message. “It’s absolutely crucial we are united and Senator Collins loses on election day.”
Politics
Rupert Lowe brands Manchester a ‘third world sh*t hole’
Rupert Lowe has branded Manchester city centre and diverse cities across the UK, “third world shithole[s]”.
While this sort of talk is common from Restore, you’d think the party would have the sense to tone it down a bit while running for the Greater Manchester mayor position.
Go and look at that video of Restore Britain’s Greater Manchester mayoral candidate, Marlon West, walking around Piccadilly Gardens late at night. It’s just disgusting, honestly. What a vile place.
Let’s call it what it is. A shithole.
A third world shithole.
And it’s not…
— Rupert Lowe MP (@RupertLowe10) July 14, 2026
Rupert Lowe: Who is he?
If you’re unfamiliar with Lowe, he’s the leader of Restore Britain. This breakaway party exists because Reform wasn’t far right enough and it’s had some success in taking voters away from Nigel Farage.
Lowe recently attracted controversy for lying about the victims of the Dunblane massacre, seemingly to curry favour with the Yanks.
16 children and a teacher died in Dunblane. But daddy's gun being taken away is more serious. Fuck rupert lowe https://t.co/WboflCqtHX
— BatesyBhoy

(@BatesyBhoy1967) July 9, 2026
As the commenter alluded to, Lowe’s dad had his gun taken away, which must have been harrowing for him. Lowe still has some firearms, though, including the shotgun he had his groundskeeper execute his pet dog with.
Lowe didn’t just attack Manchester; he also said:
And it’s not just in the middle of Manchester.
It’s everywhere, absolutely everywhere.
London, Birmingham, Glasgow. Even places like Norwich, Exeter, Cardiff, Nottingham, Rochdale, Bristol, Reading, Newcastle. It is everywhere.
It’s become a common refrain for far-right politicians to say “Britain is broken”. We don’t disagree with this statement; we just differ on what the cause is.
In our opinion, Britain is in a sorry state of affairs because 40 years of neoliberalism stripped everything to the bone. This is the political ideology of flogging everything that isn’t nailed down and then renting it back from the greedy, no-good c*nts who fund Reform UK, the Tories, and yes, even Labour.
If you leave everything to the whims of the market, towns and cities will deteriorate because there’s no profit in maintaining them. When you’ve got worn down towns filled with worn down people, of course, the vibes won’t be uniformly pleasant.
Lowe then added, with casual xenophobia:
Nowhere is safe from the third worldification of Britain – absolutely nowhere.
It’s the same feel, the same scene. Young foreign men just loitering around. Deliveroo bikes skimming about, it stinks of weed, foreign languages fill the air.
Gig work
On top of neoliberalism, we’ve had the slow death of organised labour. With that comes the gig economy and the Deliveroo bikes Lowe complained about.
In Lowe’s mind, these foreign men brought the poverty, destitution and Deliveroo bikes with them. He thinks this because it’s politically beneficial for him to do so.
The reality is the private sector hollowed Britain out, and the people Lowe complains about are plugging the gaps. If we deported every gig economy worker who wasn’t born in the UK, Britain wouldn’t become a workers’ utopia; the poorest white people would just take their place.
Now, we’re not saying we need to encourage migration for the sake of Deliver-f*cking-roo. We think all work should be well paid and rewarding. What we are saying is Lowe and others like him are selling their voters a fairytale and they’re doing it for the benefit of the people who profit from Britain breaking.
Lowest of the Lowe
Lowe ended his hate screed as follows:
A Restore Britain Government will deport millions. We will make Britain safe again.
We will not allow our country to remain a third world shithole.
That I promise you.
Migration increased under the Tories despite the constant fear mongering against migrants. This happened because it was beneficial for everyone at the top. The migrants plugged employment gaps and protected the pension pot against our ageing population while also serving as a political target for constant scapegoating.
This situation couldn’t last, of course, because eventually voters started to ask: ‘If they’re so bad, why are the Tories letting them in?‘ This is why we now have politicians like Nigel Farage and Rupert Lowe.
Potentially, these men will pull the same trick as the Tories if they take power. Regardless, if we continue down this path, we will eventually end up with someone who’s deadly serious about following through on this violent ideology. And it never ends with deportations.
Featured image via the Canary
By Willem Moore
Politics
Greta Thunberg among activists arrested for blocking Israel’s ammo manufacturer
German police have violently arrested Greta Thunberg and more than 30 other activists for blocking the road to a German arms factory.
The Rheinmetall works produces ammunition for Israel’s military. Thunberg was also arrested in the UK for protesting against the Starmer regime’s proscription of anti-genocide group, Palestine Action.
The German state and police have been among the most brutal collaborators in Israel’s genocide in Gaza. Peaceful anti-genocide activists have been beaten, imprisoned and in some cases subjected to ‘civil death’, depriving them of employment, banking and official existence.
The Peacefully Against Genocide group is holding a series of demonstrations in Berlin in early July against “Germany’s complicity” in Israel’s genocide. The group will call for Rheinmetall to stop all deliveries to Israel and close the Berlin factory.
Greta Thunberg unbowed
In October 2025, Thunberg was among a group of humanitarian flotilla volunteers beaten and abused by Israeli guards. Clearly she is unbowed and unafraid of the genocide-enabling state thugs.
Featured image via the Canary
By Skwawkbox
Politics
NATO at Ankara: meeting the ‘high minimum’
Mark Webber reflects on the key outcomes of last week’s NATO summit in Ankara.
Task proliferation is not a criticism one can any longer level at NATO. The alliance has spent the last two years stripping itself of responsibilities and political missions it once regarded as essential. The issues of climate change or Women, Peace and Security (WPS) still have their adherents within the NATO bureaucracy, but neither figured in the business of last week’s Ankara summit (or, indeed, at last year’s Hague summit). A shared interest among allies in out-of-area missions, meanwhile, evaporated with the frantic withdrawal from Afghanistan in the summer of 2021. NATO’s training mission in Iraq decamped from Baghdad to Naples in March. KFOR still helps keep the peace in Kosovo –but rumours abound that its American contingent will soon be pulled and the mission transferred to EU oversight (much like EUFOR in Bosnia). Even China, a NATO agenda item introduced by the first Trump administration and sustained under Joe Biden, is currently missing in action. It is absent from (the admittedly short) Ankara summit declaration and was mentioned only fleetingly by Secretary General Mark Rutte in his many summit remarks. A concern with ‘the persistent threat of terrorism’ remains, but only out of deference to Turkey, the summit host.
As the summit declaration makes clear, NATO is concentrating on the basics of collective defence – ‘counter[ing] the long-term threat [of] Russia’ and, by extension, offering ‘unwavering support for Ukraine.’ By demonstrating the Europeans (and Canada) can discharge those two tasks, NATO fulfils a third – keeping a sceptical United States constructively engaged in a complex process of NATO ‘Europeanisation.’ The leitmotif here is ‘a stronger Europe in a stronger NATO’ – a process whereby European allies assume more responsibility in the traditionally US-dominated NATO command structure while also shouldering a greater material burden of common defence.
Getting this right is a matter, first, of political art. At Ankara, President Donald Trump was mollified and indulged in equal measure. Allied leaders and the Secretary General took on the chin Trump’s opening press conference salvoes – that the NATO allies had not backed the United States over the war with Iran, that they were still deficient on defence spending and that Greenland should come under American control. On these matters, there was little public pushback, hence little argument. Trump, in the words of John Bew, was held in check by a ‘controlled explosion.’ Further, the American president was the subject of a collective encomium performed by allied prime ministers and presidents. Trump departed Ankara praising the love and unity he had witnessed.
As for the practicalities, here the hard work was carried out well before the summit. America’s preferred model of European security – a ‘NATO 3.0’ in which America’s ‘allies […] step up and assume primary responsibility for the conventional defence of Europe’ – had been flagged by Under Secretary of War for Policy, Elbridge Colby in February. This ‘rightsizing’ of America’s commitment was, on paper at least, completed in short order. NATO’s Supreme Allied Commander Europe (SACEUR), General Alexis Grynkewich, declared in early July that the ‘European allies [had] largely filled the gaps left by U.S. reductions to the NATO Force Model.’
This process of substitution still has a long way to run. The gaps filled, currently sit in a force-generation spreadsheet – and some of these commitments represent pledges of future effort not an ability to deliver in the present. Even with ramped up defence spending, industry on both sides of the Atlantic is struggling to keep up with demand. The summit’s Defence Industry Forum – a carefully-staged PR event of announcements and contract-signings – provided, nonetheless, evidence of the scale of ambition. The development of deep-strike capabilities, integrated air and missile defences, air-to-air refuelling, satellite and aerial surveillance, and the safeguarding of critical materials are all intended, in the words of the summit’s Strategy for Industry-NATO Cooperation, ‘to ensure that the capabilities required for NATOʼs deterrence and defence can be effectively generated, scaled and sustained.’
The timelines for these projects run years into the future. Delivery depends on maintaining high defence budgets (still a test for fiscally challenged governments in France, Italy and the UK). And integrating these new capabilities within NATO’s force and command structures and defence planning process – already complex enough – will have to be done in accordance with an unprecedented premise: the replacement of ‘the US “backbone’” in European deterrence.’
Out of necessity, NATO is gravitating toward a ‘high minimum’ – garnering the forces necessary to achieve its most basic of tasks and ignoring those which are secondary. For all its seeming simplicity, this will entail something other than moving NATO back, in Colby’s imagining, to version 1.0 of the Cold War. That NATO was sustained by persistent American leadership (now in doubt), British fortitude and reliability (also in doubt) and German quiescence (a thing of the past). The NATO of the near future will accommodate Germany as the coming European power, partner with Ukraine as Europe’s most formidable fighting force and defence innovator, and cooperate with the European Union as an agent of defence procurement and defence industry integration.
Following the Cold War, it was often argued that NATO required new tasks and new responsibilities to keep it relevant. That argument is rarely heard today. NATO has been forced back to basics by Russian belligerence and fear of American abandonment. That course is now set for the foreseeable future. It seems unlikely there will be a NATO summit in 2027. With no new political deliverables, one may not be needed.
By Mark Webber, Professor of International Politics, University of Birmingham.
-
Fashion6 days agoLoro Piana Fall 2026 Enters Houston’s Art Scene
-
Fashion4 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Nutriplenish Leave-In Conditioner
-
Sports6 days ago2026 Genesis Scottish Open Thursday TV coverage: Round 1
-
Sports5 days agoSuper Eagles star Moses Simon opens up on Liverpool transfer regret
-
Tech6 days agoCharacter.AI enters the microdrama arena with its own productions, but there’s a twist
-
News Videos16 hours agoXRP BOMBSHELL… XRP OMBOARDED FOR TRANSACTIONS!!!
-
Tech1 day agoGet Your ESP32 Sunny Side Up With This Solar Dev Board
-
Tech15 hours agoDark Secrets Emerge When Jailbreaking LLMs
-
News Videos7 days agoCrypto Just Entered Its Most Important 6-Month Candle (Could Decide Everything!)
-
NewsBeat6 days agoMajor update after Huntingdon train attack as man enters plea
-
News Videos2 days agohow to make coin bank box with cardboard #scienceproject #money #diy #shorts
-
Tech6 days agoLevel Infinite Launches Gangstar Mirage City in India with Pre-Registrations
-
Sports7 days ago39-year-old Djokovic wins five-hour thriller to enter Wimbledon semis | Other Sports News
-
Tech2 days agoCloudflare Precursor Watches Your Mouse and Keyboard To Decide If You Are Human
-
Tech6 days agoEntra passkey enrollment vishing targets Microsoft 365 users
-
Crypto World6 days agoDeFi Dashboard Zapper to Shut Down After 7 Years
-
Crypto World6 days agoMark Cuban-Backed DeFi Dashboard Zapper Shuts Down After 7 Years
-
Tech6 days agoClaude’s New Reflect Dashboard Wants To Help You Log Off Of Claude
-
Crypto World7 days agoFed minutes June 2026: officials split on rates
-
Tech6 days agoHackers can use 9 of the most popular AI tools to assemble massive botnets


You must be logged in to post a comment Login