Andy Burnham has been warned he must complete England’s devolution map at speed or preside over a “two-tier England” in which a firm’s prospects depend on whether it happens to sit inside a mayor’s boundary.

The warning comes from IPPR North, the leading think tank for the North of England, in a paper published as the incoming prime minister prepares a programme built around handing power to regional mayors.

More than a quarter of England’s population still lives outside a Mayoral Strategic Authority, the bodies that increasingly shape transport, housing and regeneration decisions. For business owners in those areas, that means no local champion with the powers and budgets their competitors in Greater Manchester or the West Midlands can call on.

The researchers argue that leaving gaps in the devolved map risks rising resentment in communities that feel left behind, with public confidence in political institutions already at historic lows.

Money is already moving on the strength of the mayoral model. NatWest’s recent £20 billion commitment to the North of England was pitched explicitly as a bet on devolution. Firms outside mayoral areas risk watching that capital flow past them.

The current government has already legislated, with the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Act receiving Royal Assent in April, and has signalled a willingness to go further on devolving tax powers to mayors. But the think tank warns that slow, incremental change has left Whitehall dominating decision-making, so the full benefits have yet to be felt.

Its recommendations are blunt. Complete the devolution map in England by the end of this parliament, and explore extending regional devolution to city regions in Scotland and Wales. Set out ambitious plans for fiscal devolution at this autumn’s Budget, allowing places to retain a share of taxes and borrow to invest in transport, housing and regeneration. And expand “hyperlocal” government so communities, not just mayors, shape decisions.

The fiscal point is where SME owners should pay closest attention. Rachel Reeves has already described fiscal devolution as her “unfinished business”, with consultations under way on visitor levies and devolving revenues from income, business and land taxes. Who sets and spends those taxes, and where, will matter enormously to firms’ costs and their local trading environment.

Dr Ryan Swift, research fellow and author of the publication, said: “We know the incoming PM has signalled his ambition for devolution in England, but we must move beyond incrementalism, or his efforts could be in vain.

“If the new government is serious about delivering economic growth, tackling regional inequalities, and rebuilding trust in politics we can’t continue as we are. Gradual change won’t cut it any more, this is the time to move quickly and with purpose.

“That means giving regions not just more responsibilities, but powers, resources, and democratic legitimacy to make a real difference in places all across the country. It means empowering communities as well as mayors. And it means embedding these changes constitutionally, so that we can benefit from it for the decades to come, no matter who is in Number 10.

“Now is the time, now is the opportunity. It cannot be squandered.”

Mirte Boot, interim head of IPPR North, said: “With the UK in a political trust crisis, the incoming prime minister does not have time to waste.

“We have set out a radical proposal to see devolution truly make a difference to peoples lives, with ambitious fiscal devolution and a reformed regional second chamber. Local leaders should be in charge of local decisions. We saw the impact that has had in Manchester, now we have to see it replicated across the country.

“But with this radical work must come urgency: Whitehall will resist change and populists will exploit every failure. The test now is if Burnham can act quickly enough to deliver the meaningful change this country has been waiting for.”

For a business community in which eight in ten SME owners have admitted to fears about a Burnham premiership, the test cuts both ways. If Burnham delivers what he calls “the biggest rebalancing of power the country has ever seen”, decisions on transport, skills and regeneration will be taken closer to the firms they affect. If he fails, England’s businesses will be trading in two very different countries.

Amy Ingham

Amy is a newly qualified journalist specialising in business journalism at Business Matters with responsibility for news content for what is now the UK’s largest print and online source of current business news.

Advertisement

Yael Selfin, chief economist at KPMG, said the warmer weather in May helped to boost consumer spending, which is likely to have continued into June and July thanks to the World Cup.

However, she added, while this would help the services sector, “it may not be enough to offset weakness across other parts of the economy”.

“The recent rise in energy prices, driven by a pick-up in tensions in the Middle East, could pose a risk to the growth outlook, with financial conditions also tightening as a result,” Selfin said.

Since hostilities resumed between the US and Iran last week, the price of oil has risen from about $72 a barrel to $84, although it remains well below the peak of around $120 seen earlier this year.

The growth in May “is not a bad welcome gift for incoming PM Andy Burnham”, said Paul Dales, chief UK economist at Capital Economics.

“But with higher energy prices still restraining real incomes, he shouldn’t get used to it.”

Responding to the latest figures, a spokesperson for the Treasury said: “We have the right economic plan which has put the UK in a much stronger position than two years ago with the fastest growth in the G7 in the first quarter and the OECD agreeing that we have restored stability.”

This article was written by

Follow

According to exchange data, Abakkus Investment Managers Pvt. Ltd. purchased 29,39,588 shares of Mrs Bectors Food on July 15, representing around 0.96% equity in the company. The shares were acquired at an average price of Rs 168.97 apiece, marginally below the previous day’s BSE closing price of Rs 169.45.

The bulk purchase sparked fresh buying interest in the stock, which has been under pressure in recent months. Over the past three months, Mrs Bectors Food shares have declined around 15%, while the stock has fallen nearly 42% over the last year, significantly underperforming the broader market.

At the current market price, the company commands a market capitalisation of Rs 5,202 crore. The stock has touched a 52-week high of Rs 318.18 and a 52-week low of Rs 164.95, indicating a sharp correction from its peak.

From a valuation standpoint, Mrs Bectors Food trades at a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 36.45, a price-to-sales (P/S) ratio of 2.69, and a price-to-book (P/B) ratio of 4.04.

Live Events

Technical indicators continue to suggest caution. The stock’s 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) stands at 39, indicating that it is approaching the oversold zone, though it remains above the 30-mark typically considered oversold. Additionally, the stock is trading below all eight of its key simple moving averages (SMAs), reflecting a prevailing bearish trend.
Despite the recent weakness, analysts remain optimistic about the company’s prospects. According to Trendlyne data, the consensus target price implies an upside potential of around 35% from current levels. The stock also enjoys a ‘Strong Buy’ consensus recommendation from 11 analysts, highlighting expectations of a potential recovery in the coming months.

Earnings Watch

Mrs Bectors Food Specialities is yet to announce its June 2026 quarter results. In the March 2026 quarter, the company reported an 8.4% year-on-year rise in consolidated revenue to Rs 496 crore, while consolidated net profit increased 3.3% YoY to Rs 35 crore, indicating steady business growth despite relatively modest earnings expansion.(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of Economic Times)