The luxury homeware company has stores across the country and is known for selling quality bedding, towels, clothing, candles and more.

Fans of the brand don’t have long to wait until the third store in Manchester opens – here’s what we know.

The White Company to open new store at The Trafford Centre in March 2026

The new store is set to open this spring, and it’s one of two coming to the north in this expansion.

Shoppers can look forward to the new store opening in The Trafford Centre on Friday, March 20.

The White Company to open 4 new UK stores in 2026

These are all the confirmed stores opening in the UK soon:

• Northallerton – Monday, February 23
• Trafford Centre – Friday, March 20
• Lakeside – Wednesday, March 25
• Horsham – April (exact date to be confirmed)

The news of the opening at The Trafford Centre comes following an announcement from luxury fashion brand LK Bennett, which confirmed it would be entering administration.

The company currently operates a concession at John Lewis in the Trafford Centre, alongside nine standalone stores and 13 concessions across the UK and Ireland.

Recommended reading:

Shoppers in Trafford and across Greater Manchester will still be able to visit the John Lewis concession in the short term, but it is expected to close permanently once the administration trading period ends.

Back in August 2025, The Trafford Centre opened the first standalone Primark Home store at Trafford Palazzo.

What’s your favourite shop in The Trafford Centre? Let us know in the comments below.

The government’s ability to deal with drones that pose a threat on American soil has been questioned this week after the use of a laser designed to shoot down drones near the border in Texas led to the abrupt closure of the airspace over El Paso, sources familiar with the situation told The Associated Press.

The details of exactly what happened before the Federal Aviation Administration shut down the busy airport in the Mexican border city on Wednesday aren’t entirely clear, but a source familiar with the situation told AP that the laser was deployed by U.S. Customs and Border Protection without coordinating with the FAA.

Two months ago, Congress agreed to give more law enforcement agencies the authority to take down rogue drones as long as they are properly trained. That could make situations like the one in El Paso more likely. Previously, only a select few federal agencies had that power.

Here’s a look at what happened and the issues that raised:

Communication issues acknowledged

The government would say only that the airspace was shut down when an incursion by Mexican drug cartel drones was neutralized.

But the two people who discussed sensitive details on condition of anonymity said the FAA grounded every aircraft in the El Paso area over concerns about the safety of the laser system being used near commercial planes. The restrictions were initially expected to last 10 days, but then they were lifted a few hours later.

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said Friday that the government agencies involved in El Paso are working to address the concerns that led to the cancellation of more than a dozen flights and sent travelers scrambling.

“This was a joint agency task force mission that was undertaken and we’re continuing to work on the communication through that,” Noem said in Arizona.

But drone warfare expert Brett Velicovich said the dysfunction in Texas raises questions about whether the U.S. will be prepared to deal with a significant drone threat.

“We need to simplify the authorities for who is really in charge and get these egos out of the way from these different agencies before an American gets hurt,” said Velicovich, who founded drone maker Power.us and consults on ways to mitigate their threats.

Drones can be a threat

Armed drones carry out devastating attacks daily in Ukraine. The unmanned vehicles have also allowed Ukraine to strike deep within Russia.

Velicovich, who used to use Predator drones in the military to bomb targets, said it wouldn’t be hard for someone with malicious intent to buy a drone for a few hundred bucks and do great harm at a major public event like a World Cup match or the celebrations of America’s 250th birthday that are planned this summer.

Cartels routinely use drones to deliver drugs across the Mexican border and surveil Border Patrol officers. Officials told Congress last summer that more than 27,000 drones were detected within 1,600 feet (500 meters) of the southern border in the last six months of 2024.

The government recently handed out $250 million in grants to the 11 states that are set to host World Cup matches this summer to help them prepare for the threat of drones. Another $250 million in grants will be awarded later this year to strengthen the nation’s drone defenses.

More near misses involving drones

The threat to planes from drones continues to increase along with the number of near misses around airports. Homeland Security estimates there are more than 1.7 million registered drones flying in the United States, and that number has been growing.

Larger drones are required to carry a radio transponder that identifies the drone’s owner and broadcasts its position to help avert collisions. Cities can also invest in additional sensors around stadiums to help quickly detect drones.

Airspace Link, a Detroit company, created a low altitude air traffic control system to track drones and can alert authorities who might soon be able to take action. Cities can buy additional sensors to upgrade that system around stadiums or other high-profile locations.

“We don’t want something to happen,” said CEO Michael Healander. “But we also want to be prepared to have the tools in place to take action, because these are such big global events.”

Acting against rogue drones

Common anti-drone systems use radio signals to jam or force drones to land. But the government has also developed high-powered microwaves or laser beams like the one sources say was used in Texas this week that are capable of disabling the machines.

Some other systems station small drones to take flight quickly and ram into drones that are considered a threat. And there are systems that use bullets to shoot down drones.

Michael Robbins, president and CEO of the Association for Uncrewed Vehicle Systems International trade group, said these counter drone systems are more common in warzones than across the United States. But the government is working to get them into the hands of more officers nationwide.

“It’s our belief that this is important technology that when responsibly used with proper oversight and intensive training will help to mitigate unsafe or malicious drones in the very rare instances where that needs to occur,” Robbins said.

Pilots worry about drones

Allied Pilots Association union spokesman Capt. Dennis Tajer said he’s not sure how big of a threat the counter drone technology is to the American Airlines jets he flies because so few details have been released about what happened in Texas. And officials with Homeland Security and the FAA didn’t respond to questions about it again on Friday.

Tajer said he’s more concerned about the possibility of a passenger jet running into a drone because that could bring the plane down. A year ago, 67 people were killed when an American Airlines jet collided with an Army helicopter near Washington, D.C.

“You don’t have to be a pilot, an engineer or a defense expert to understand that two pieces of metal in the sky that one doesn’t know the other is there and is uncontrolled is dangerous,” Tajer said. “We’ve got to keep those two pieces of metal away from each other.”

____

Associated Press writer Josh Kelety contributed from Scottsdale, Arizona.

WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. military said Friday that it has carried out another deadly strike on a vessel accused of trafficking drugs in the Caribbean Sea.

U.S. Southern Command said on social media that the boat “was transiting along known narco-trafficking routes in the Caribbean and was engaged in narco-trafficking operations.” It said the strike killed three people. A video linked to the post shows a boat moving through the water before exploding in flames.

Friday’s attack raises the death toll from the Trump administration’s strikes on alleged drug boats to 133 people in at least 38 attacks carried out since early September in the Caribbean Sea and eastern Pacific Ocean.

U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth declared last week that “some top cartel drug-traffickers” in the region “have decided to cease all narcotics operations INDEFINITELY due to recent (highly effective) kinetic strikes in the Caribbean.” However, Hegseth did not provide any details or information to back up this claim, made in a post on his personal account on social media.

President Donald Trump has said the U.S. is in “armed conflict” with cartels in Latin America and has justified the attacks as a necessary escalation to stem the flow of drugs. But his administration has offered little evidence to support its claims of killing “narcoterrorists.”

Richard Caulkin, 44, and Wendy Caulkin, 46, have both had their lives saved by organ transplants. Wendy received a new heart in 2011 while Richard had a double lung transplant in 2009. The couple are urging people to join the organ donor register. Wendy needs a new kidney as her have failed as a side-effect of the drugs needed to protect her new heart (NHSBT/PA)

Sir Keir Starmer will accuse parties like Reform UK and the Greens of being “soft on Russia”, “weak on NATO” and more likely to leave the nation divided and defeated.

The prime minister will further risk the wrath of Nigel Farage and his Brexiteers by saying that the UK is no longer the “Britain of the Brexit years” in a call for European unity to defend the continent from Russian aggression as the US steps back.

The comments will be delivered in a speech to global leaders at a security summit in Munich on Saturday.

However, despite the strong language, he is not expected to announce any plans to speed up a pledge to increase core defence spending from just over 2.3% to 3.5% of GDP by 2035.

Military officers privately concede this near-decade-long timeline, despite being agreed by all NATO allies, is far too slow and unambitious, given the scale of the threat posed by Russia and the need for the European side of the transatlantic alliance to do much more to defend itself as Donald Trump moves US assets away from the continent to focus on other priorities.

In an extraordinary attack on Reform UK and the Green Party, Sir Keir underlined the need to explain to the public why it is important to invest in rebuilding Britain’s defences.

“Because, if we don’t, the peddlers of easy answers on the extreme left and the extreme right are ready. They will offer their solutions instead,” he will say, according to excerpts from the speech released in advance.

“It’s striking that the different ends of the spectrum share so much. Soft on Russia and weak on NATO – if not outright opposed.

“And determined to sacrifice the longstanding relationships that we want and need to build, on the altar of their ideology.

“The future they offer is one of division and then capitulation. The lamps would go out across Europe once again. But we will not let that happen.”

A spokesperson for Reform UK fought back in a statement: “This is a speech from a weak prime minister on the verge of being hounded out of office by his own party. This is a man that refuses to find the money to increase defence spending and is making our country weaker and less secure.

“Reform UK believes our priority should be rebuilding our armed forces, properly funding defence to at least 3.5% of GDP, standing up to China and Russia and strengthening our bilateral relationships.”

Read more from Sky News:
Doctors speaking out against Iran
The schism between Trump and Israel
Mandelson asked to testify in US

The Starmer government is looking to forge closer relations with European Union allies in procuring military equipment, such as missiles, warplanes and drones – a strengthening of ties that were badly strained after the UK voted to leave the bloc a decade ago.

“We are not the Britain of the Brexit years anymore,” the prime minister is expected to say.

“Because we know that, in dangerous times, we would not take control by turning inward – we would surrender it. And I won’t let that happen.

“There is no British security without Europe, and no European security without Britain. That is the lesson of history – and it is today’s reality too.”

The comments triggered an instant backlash from the Conservatives.

Dame Priti Patel, the shadow foreign secretary, said: “Keir Starmer has a habit of handing away sovereignty and now he is once again rolling the pitch for greater EU integration and less control for the UK.

“Britain is uniquely placed to help bring the US and Europe together, ensuring NATO is as strong as possible. We must not be overdependent on America, but neither should we offer Europe a blank cheque, prepared to accept any and all costs as Labour are.”

In what has become the biggest public annual gathering on European security, the three-day Munich Security Conference is also bringing together Marco Rubio, the US secretary of state, as well as leaders of European allies such as Germany and France, plus delegates from across the world, including China’s foreign minister.

Advertisement

Share

NATO defence ministers meet – with Hegseth a no-show

Advertisement

Volodymyr Zelenskyy, the Ukrainian president, is also present and is due to give his speech to the conference as well on Saturday, with efforts still under way, led by the US, to secure a peace deal between Kyiv and Moscow even as Russia’s full-scale war is about to enter its fifth year.

Mindful of the need to keep Washington close, Sir Keir is expected to say that the US remains an indispensable ally – but that the UK and Europe need to be able to operate militarily with more independence.

“I’m talking about a vision of European security and greater European autonomy that does not herald US withdrawal but answers the call for more burden sharing in full, and remakes the ties that have served us so well,” he is expected to say.

A wine lover has shared her tip for getting ‘quality’ bottles of wine for under £6 each away from supermarkets

I hold three wine qualifications, so getting the right bottle is important to me. I often find myself visiting my local supermarket ASDA to pick one up, but, sometimes, I find myself wanting more of a superior range.

There are certain wines on the supermarket shelves that are nice enough, but when I’m paying over £10 a bottle, I feel like I’d likely discover both improved value and quality elsewhere. I’d heard excellent things about Naked Wines, and was fortunate enough to test their wine advent calendar years ago, but I’d never actually tried a case before.

That is until last week. I browsed through the range of cases that were on offer and whilst I do enjoy a smooth red and crisp white, I didn’t select that box. Instead I compared the wines inside with the Adventurer’s Mixed Selection Case and decided it was worth the risk.

How Naked Wines operates is subscribers pay £25 a month in credit they can spend on their choice of wine – with options to use their experts to pick for them if desired. However, new subscribers can secure a £144.99 case for £69.99 by claiming a voucher, which reduces the price to £5.83 a bottle – significantly cheaper than the supermarket for inferior quality wine, reports the Mirror.

This is because Naked Wines eliminates the middle-person to deliver wine directly to the consumer from the winemakers. Now, it only arrived last week and turned up at my door in time for the weekend.

£75 off Naked Wines

£144.99

£69.99

Naked Wines

Advertisement

Buy Now on Naked Wines

New Customers can bag £75 off their first order

Three days afterwards, the wines listed as included in the box on the website have altered, with the Tempranillo rosé and Pinot Grigio I brought to my book club switched out.

I’m delighted that the wines change regularly – for those wanting to sample new wines, it appears to be a reliable wager that there will constantly be a variety available in the cases. However, Angels – the name of subscribers to Naked Wines – can rate their wines and add them to future orders as long as they’re still available, so there’s still a chance to get preferred wines back.

There is also a complimentary bottle of wine whenever they order a case of 12. As long as someone has the storage capacity for the wine I think this is a brilliant way to do it, I can see 12 bottles lasting me months.

I went through two of the bottles at the weekend with my book club and I’m eyeing up the pinotage for a lovely dinner when my best friend comes to visit.

I’m pleased that on the back of the bottles there’s a QR code that leads to a more comprehensive description of what’s in the bottle. There’s also a concise description of the wine and a guide for what food it’s best paired with.

This makes it considerably easier to grab a bottle after dinner is already served or to even plan a meal around the bottle. The bottles I’ve sampled so far were delightful.

I chose a bottle of white and a bottle of rosé that we enjoyed between mouthfuls of hummus and tortilla chips as we delved into the finer details of our latest read. The wine was such a success that my aunt even enquired where she could purchase it.

The Tempranillo rosé is a fresh and ‘ready to party’ rosé which absolutely hit the spot. It boasts typical notes of strawberries, cherries and a hint of grapefruit.

Although it can be paired with fish, vegetables and spicy food, we decided against matching it with a hot meal and instead savoured it as we chatted.

The Giano Pinot Grigio DOC was incredibly easy to drink. With hints of peach and green apple alongside a zesty lemon note, it complemented the hummus well but would pair even better with a light pasta dish. These are by no means the most complex wines I’ve ever experienced (that accolade belongs to some very old bottles of reds that I actually don’t wish to drink again) but they are so effortless to drink.

It’s crucial to always remember to drink responsibly, but I think with a good bottle of wine that can be appreciated, that’s simple to do.

I have sampled and enjoyed other wine subscription services, with Virgin Wines (which has cases beginning at £122.88) actually introducing me to some of my favourites like Gruner Veltliner and Good Pair Days notably having incredible wine accessories that are ideal for a picnic or when hosting guests. The prices are quite comparable.

One thing’s for certain, I definitely see the advantages in purchasing wine online rather than winging it in the supermarket. The quality is massively superior.

A reader feels Sony was the weakest part of the recent State of Play and draws a comparison with Valve’s disengagement from making video games.

Despite the late starting time I stayed up and watched the State of Play on Thursday and I’d say in general I wasn’t disappointed. There was a lot of great games and a decent range of genres. I would’ve given it top marks if the Castlevania game had been 3D or we’d seen something on the third Final Fantasy 7 remake game but overall I was entertained and very interested in Silent Hill Townfall, John Wick, and Yakoh Shinobi Ops.

The biggest disappointment by far though, and the thing that almost ruined it for me, was seeing how little effort Sony themselves put into it. GC covered some of this in their report on the livestream, but Sony didn’t really announce anything new that was made by themselves, they’re just publishing games made by outsiders again – their own studios working on who knows what (or just getting covered in cobwebs).

As everyone knows, they’ve been like this for a while but what hit me with this State of Play is how similar they’ve become to modern day Valve. Both are important pillars of the gaming industry but both seem to have lost all interest in making video games, apparently because they make so much money by simply selling other people’s.

I realise making money is the one and only goal of a company, but I still find this a very strange attitude. Video games are still profitable – very much so if they’re a big hit – and exclusive games are a big reason why people pick a particular console. Although I suppose that matters less to Sony now that no one is picking an Xbox.

But making video games is still something Sony is expected to do, it’s why us fans have been so frustrated and angry with them over the last few years. There’s always an excuse though, first it was Covid, then it was rising costs, then it was the stupid live service pivot – which may or may not be over now.

With this latest State of Play it occurred to me that it’s a lot simpler than that: Sony just isn’t that interested in making games anymore. They do the bare minimum to justify keeping their studios going and that is it. They’re just not that bothered about speeding things up and there doesn’t seem to be any passion for anything.

The head of PlayStation, whoever that even is now, never appears on these things anymore and you can see from the half-hearted way that Horizon Hunters Gathering (which wasn’t in the State of Play) was announced that they’re just going through the motions.

I wouldn’t be surprised if they started shutting down their first party studios and just didn’t bother with games anymore, then they’d be even more like Valve.

Valve used to be one of the most respected developers in the world, with games like Half-Life, Left 4 Dead, and Portal but now that Steam has a monopoly on PC gaming they just don’t care anymore. They haven’t made a normal single-player game in over a decade and all their talent slowly left, after years spent twiddling their thumbs.

It’s been so long most younger gamers probably don’t even realise Valve used to make their own games and I worry it’s going to get like that with Sony. They had their longest ever State of Play and they couldn’t even announce a single new game made by a first party developer (if it’s found out they are doing the God Of War remake trilogy then that will still be the lamest, least interesting option possible).

I just don’t get it. Especially as it’s always been true that companies make more money on software than hardware (Microsoft better hope that’s true at least). Presumably they’ve run the numbers and figured out that sitting around doing nothing is the best option but It doesn’t seem that way to me.

By reader Soldat

The reader’s features do not necessarily represent the views of GameCentral or Metro.

You can submit your own 500 to 600-word reader feature at any time, which if used will be published in the next appropriate weekend slot.

Just contact us at gamecentral@metro.co.uk or use our Submit Stuff page and you won’t need to send an email.

MORE: Xbox can’t be a third party publisher if no one likes their games – Reader’s Feature

MORE: The redemption of the PS5 beings with Horizon Hunters Gathering – Reader’s Feature

MORE: I’m glad GAME is going away as buying games digitally is better than physical – Reader’s Feature

One woman, who has face blindness, has difficulty watching films with more than four characters, but her companion helped to explain who is who when she got confused. Another woman, with severe dyslexia, used the AI to help her read labels in shops. And another, with misophonia – she finds everyday noises overwhelming – says 4o could help regulate her by making her laugh.

President Trump vowed to impose voter ID requirements ahead of the midterms, with or without congressional approval, the latest escalation of his campaign to assert more control over elections, which he baselessly claims Democrats have been rigging against him and others.

“We cannot let the Democrats get away with NO VOTER I.D. any longer,” the president wrote in a Truth Social post on Friday afternoon. “These are horrible, disingenuous CHEATERS.”

“I have searched the depths of Legal Arguments not yet articulated or vetted on this subject, and will be presenting an irrefutable one in the very near future,” he wrote in another post. “There will be Voter I.D. for the Midterm Elections, whether approved by Congress or not!”

The president, in his posts, also made an unusually partisan direct address to the Supreme Court, claiming that if the status quo remained, Democrats would eventually try to pack the court with an expanded number of justices, end the filibuster in Congress, and add additional U.S. states.

“Our Country will never be the same if they allow these demented and evil people to knowingly, and happily, destroy it,” Trump wrote.

open image in gallery

The comments alarmed critics of the president.

“Trump’s authoritarian takeover and interference in the midterm elections under the guise of ‘election integrity’ has begun,” Melanie D’Arrigo, executive director of the advocacy group Campaign for New York Health, wrote on X.

This week, the House passed the SAVE Act along party lines, which would require proof of citizenship to vote and let the Department of Homeland Security seize voter rolls.

Republicans supporting the bill echoed the president’s unfounded claims of mass election interference from Democrats.

“Cheating is the only path to victory,” Representative Mary Miller, Republican of Illinois, told The New York Times.

Critics of the effort, which is unlikely to advance through the Senate, accuse the Republicans of pursuing a thinly veiled attempt at voter disenfranchisement, given that it is already illegal for non-citizens to vote, and millions of Americans don’t possess the legal documents, like a passport, that would help them prove their citizenship.

Almost all states require voters to attest that they are citizens to vote, under penalty of perjury.

open image in gallery

Earlier this month, a federal judge in Washington blocked parts of a previous Trump executive order requiring documented proof of citizenship when military members register to vote and mandating agencies “assess citizenship” before providing federal voting forms.

“Put simply, our Constitution does not allow the President to impose unilateral changes to federal election procedures,” U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly wrote.

The Constitution leaves administering elections largely to the states, but President Trump has continued to push for more federal involvement, an effort rooted in his continued insistence that non-citizens are cheating in elections, even though analysis, including a review by the Trump administration, suggests this barely ever happens and does not sway elections.

Earlier this month, the president called on Republicans to “nationalize” elections.

The White House has said it can offer “no guarantee” that federal immigration agents won’t be present at polling stations, as MAGA allies like podcaster and former White House strategist Steve Bannon have pushed to use armed immigration agents to “surround the polls.”

The Justice Department has sued multiple states to force them to turn over voter registration information.

Leaders in Illinois accused the administration of using federal force there to dampen civic participation and voter turnout in future elections.

Gov. JB Pritzker called the efforts a way to “circumvent our democracy, militarize our cities, and end elections.”