Politics
Trump’s Gaza peace plan shrinks amid fears of new Israeli offensive
Trump and his shambolic Board of Peace (BoP) has discarded its recovery plan for Gaza, opting instead for a “tiny pilot scheme” amid fears of a “new all-out offensive before Israeli elections,” the Guardian reported.
The so-called ceasefire hasn’t stopped Israel’s daily bombardment of Gaza. As recently as 16 July, Israeli forces were again striking Palestinians huddled inside tents.
Israel is maniacally bombing Palestinians in tattered tents again tonight. Every. Single. Day. Not a single shot from Hamas for more than 10 months & Israel has killed more than a thousand Palestinians since — including more than 200 children. pic.twitter.com/DWzA42MAyq
— Samira Mohyeddin سمیرا (@SMohyeddin) July 16, 2026
The Guardian quoted a diplomat in Jerusalem as saying that the BoP had no choice but to make the most of very limited progress, as an admission of failure would open the way for extreme factions in the Israeli government with radically different plans for Gaza.
The aim is just to keep something going, keep the ball in play, because if you stop there are others with a more extreme agenda just waiting to jump in and take over, and they are talking about wholesale population transfer and colonisation.
Concentration camps
The Guardian reported that the pilot project has been denounced by critics, including former Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmert, as a “concentration camp” in the making.
The scheme envisions portable cabins for tens of thousands of displaced Palestinians in a camp near Rafah, set up along the ceasefire line.
Israeli troops would withdraw from the line, with security overseen by the International Stabilization Force (ISF) and a Palestinian police force yet to be trained in Egypt.
Preference would be given to former residents of the Rafah area, but BoP officials insist there will be freedom of movement in and out of the camp.
It quotes Muhammad Shehada of the European Council on Foreign Relations as cautioning that Israel would use the camp as a “Potemkin village” to lend credibility to its escalating military campaign against the rest of Gaza.
Trump’s Bored of peace
The X page of the Board of Peace shows the lack of activity.
It has a flurry of performative diplomacy masking a vacuum of actual progress.
It is busy bashing UNRWA. The BoP has made dismantling the UN relief agency a central fixation, framing it as a “complex of perpetual aid dependency” while offering little more than slogans about “peace and prosperity” in its place.
UNRWA has no place in the new Gaza. We are turning the page on the complex of perpetual aid dependency & conflict. The people of Gaza deserve better. https://t.co/MttkJqX1Np
— Board of Peace (@BoardOfPeace) July 1, 2026
Euro-Med Monitor has said that the BoP’s position is closely linked to Israeli campaigns of incitement and targeting against UNRWA.
It said:
Israel’s actions against UNRWA are part of a wider, systematic pattern of targeting Palestinians and their survival resources. This includes attacks on the Agency’s staff and facilities, which are safeguarded by international law. To date, 391 of the Agency’s employees and affiliate workers have been killed, and 312 of its facilities have been damaged or destroyed. Many of these facilities housed displaced civilians seeking refuge, who later fell victim to lethal attacks.
By The Canary
Politics
Politics Home Article | Burnham Says It Is Labour’s Last Chance As He Is Crowned Leader

Andy Burnham speaks after being confirmed as the Labour Party’s new leader (Alamy)
4 min read
Andy Burnham has said this is the Labour Party’s “last chance to change” in his first speech as the party’s new leader.
At a special party conference in central London, Burnham said: “I will work to build a new politics. The country is crying out for it. We might enjoy the point scoring against others. The public don’t.”
“How can politicians point fingers when living standards are falling and politics as a whole isn’t working for them? It infuriates them and makes them switch off.”
He added: “Let’s be honest, everybody: this is a last chance to change, and we must take it together, united together.”
After two previous attempts to become Labour leader in 2010 and then 2015, he became Labour leader unopposed after winning nominations from 369 of the party’s 403 MPs. However, he will not become Prime Minister until Monday.
The MP for Makerfield returned to Westminster last month after a by-election victory which led to Keir Starmer’s resignation just days later.
Burnham paid tribute to Keir Starmer for transforming the party after the crushing 2019 general election and said he “put Labour back in a position to change people’s lives”.
The new Labour leader said the only way to beat the “new right” is to end factional in-fighting.
“Fighting to eradicate it and the insidious briefing culture that goes along with it will characterise my leadership,” he promised.
“In future, when a Burnhamite walks into a bar,” he said, joking about a well-worn Westminster gag, that they will say: “Great to see you. We don’t like factional politics here.”
Burnham promised to set an “authentically” clear direction for the party, accusing his Labour predecessors of being too much like the Conservatives.
He said: “As your leader, I will set a direction that is distinctively Labour. We won’t try to out-Green the Greens or out-Reform Reform or doing what we’ve done in the past of wearing too many Tory clothes. Let me tell you, I’m quite happy that Kemi doesn’t approve of my wardrobe choices because I’m not keen on theirs either.
“From here we do it differently. We win by being us, boldly, confidently, authentically us. Labour. That’s how we win. I want people to understand the thinking behind the political direction I set so people can see the decisions we take and the reasons why.”
With mounting speculation about who will be in his Cabinet and who will be Chancellor, the Labour leader says he has made no decisions yet.
“When I have you will see that it reflects all parts of our party, all communities and it will reflect your own place within this great place within this great party of ours,” he said.
“A stronger, more united Labour Party building up a stronger and more united Britain.”
Burnham pledged to “help places that built our party” and accused Margaret Thatcher of stripping power from Labour’s heartlands in the 1980s.
“Change starts with honesty. We must recognise that this generation of politicians, myself included, have failed to challenge a political culture and an economic model that simply doesn’t work well enough for ordinary people.
“Four decades of the neoliberalism that begun in the 1980s have not been kind to the places that built our party, nor to the communities across the UK, nor to the communities across the UK in rural and coastal areas.”
Burnham pledged to be a “pro-business” leader and to “re-industrialise” as he set out his vision for Britain.
“We want to give your area more power to build the council and social homes that you desperately need, more power to improve your high street, backing local businesses such as the pubs and the shops that bring them to life.
“And make no mistake, everybody, I will be a pro-business leader of the Labour Party as I was a pro-business mayor of Greater Manchester… and as part of that more power to re-industrialise.”
Burnham has promised to be a leader for “all places” of the UK as he laid out his devolution agenda.
“We will take power back from Westminster and Whitehall and give it to the place where you live. More power over life’s essentials so you can make them work better, and more affordable for people.”
The new Labour leader said he had made mistakes throughout his political career, but promised to give this new job “his all”.
“I haven’t got everything right, and I’m sorry for when I’ve fallen short. But I’ve always given it my all and I always will.”
He added: “I won’t change. I have a style, it’s my style, I will always stay close to the ground. Close to the people. Hopefully, still in my season ticket when the new season starts.”
Politics
Toxic pesticide stitch-up is a death sentence for wildlife
A disgusting leak has exposed the hijacking of our democratic system by Europe’s most powerful corporate lobbying group. It’s killing vital wildlife protections. Plotting behind closed doors, billionaire agricultural business interests have systematically swapped the safety of our planet, our wildlife and our communities for cash.
The war on wildlife
The European Union planned to cut pesticide use by half to try to protect vulnerable, collapsing ecosystems. But Copa-Cogeca, Europe’s most powerful farming lobby, launched a ruthless campaign to stop it in the name of corporate profits. And our vulnerable wildlife is paying the price, with pesticides shredding bee populations, poisoning the earth and wiping out birds and wildlife that need a healthy ecosystem to survive.
Crucial reporting from @zdboren.
"Newly revealed documents from inside the most powerful farming lobby in Europe show how it delayed, gutted and overturned some of the most sweeping farming reforms in EU history…"https://t.co/ZehyAsLumr — Jan Dutkiewicz (@jan_dutkiewicz) July 16, 2026
Yet this vicious lobby fought tooth and nail to protect these toxic, bee-killing chemicals, including glyphosate. Leaked documents capture the dark lobbying to protect glyphosate, which the World Health Organisation has classified as probably carcinogenic.
They chose to put their bank accounts first and as a result, have launched a campaign to shield industrial-scale animal cruelty, including vile practices such as foie gras and the fur markets.
The backroom heist of politics
This was not a democratic debate. This was a calculated political hijacking, and its aim was to run down the clock. Internal documents show this lobbying group used delay tactics with massive political pressure to force the European Commission to drop its green objectives.
In September 2022, internal memos suggested slowing the vital pesticide legislation until the 2024 European Parliament elections. Another two-year death sentence for our environment. The lobby group knew that as the elections neared, politicians were likely to drop the green rules to grab rural votes.
Copa-Cogeca was successful in delaying the process by demanding ridiculous impact assessments. This vile stalling tactic worked perfectly. The EU fully withdrew these crucial pesticide regulations in February 2024, and it has left wildlife at their mercy. Thomas Waitz, Green MEP from Austria sits on the Agricultural Committee said:
“Copa-Cogeca focused on sabotaging, delaying, and ultimately killing the sustainable use of pesticides regulation. They are acting in the interest of large agrichemical multinationals and against the wellbeing of small and medium farmers.”
Corporate profits over health
This corporate sabotage didn’t stop at poisonous pesticides. Copa-Cogeca ruthlessly targeted rules that were designed to oversee polluting and industrial factory farms. They specifically prioritised corporate profits over our human health and animal welfare. A major EU target to cut pesticides in half to protect biodiversity was ripped to shreds by this vile corporate giant.
This disgusting entity managed to raise the threshold for what counts as industrial farming by a whopping 50%. This corporate manipulation was hidden from the public. And politicians hadn’t even seen the proposed rules before they were decimated. Copa-Cogeca then coordinated with EU commissioners to attack and weaken health criteria.
This backroom deal has a massive human cost. It robs the public of €1.8bn in lost health benefits annually, all because of pollution. And even worse? The final laws excluded cattle farms ENTIRELY, and weakened the rules for pigs. Pigs have the same level of intelligence as a human toddler. And they have sentenced millions of them to horrific conditions in unregulated industrial farms. To live out their lives in tiny, filthy cages, waiting to die.
A hit list of wildlife
Tragedies are already unfolding in our forests and fields because of these lobbying efforts. Somehow, in all of this, wolves in the EU have now lost their strictly protected status. All because of the relentless lobbying of these corporate entities.
Copa-Cogeca spent years trying to strip the wolf of its protections. In June 2025, the EU amended its habitat directives to allow wolves to be slaughtered. The company celebrated this as a “major lobbying victory”.
Disgusting cruelty to wolves in Spain as EU lifts protection on this endangered species across the Continent pic.twitter.com/9rqvbFm7YI
— dominic dyer (@domdyer70) January 19, 2025
And even worse? They’re already planning their next massacre. Secretive files show the lobbying group is creating a new hit list of which species to target next. And when does this list stop? Because the pockets of these companies are endlessly deep, and it won’t cease until they’re full. They will not stop until they have wiped out everything in the name of profit.
We need to ask ourselves how long are we going to let these insatiable corporate dogs poison our planet? If we don’t stop these dodgy lobbyists and their backdoor tactics, there will be no more wildlife to protect.
Featured image via the Canary
By Antifabot
Politics
‘My Birth Injury Remained Undiagnosed For Years’
It’s no secret that maternity care in England is in real crisis. A recent 174-page report reiterated what many – families, midwives, legal experts – have known for years: too many women and their babies are frequently experiencing harm.
Baroness Valerie Amos, chair of the National Maternity and Neonatal Investigation which published the report, called for an immediate overhaul of the maternity system as “it is not fit for the now, and it is not fit for the future”.
Issues repeatedly flagged during the investigation included women and families not being listened to; racism and discrimination; and services not being set up to support women’s choices.
In the very worst cases, women and babies died, while many others have been left with long-lasting injuries and trauma.
As conversations around the broken maternity system continue to swirl, Zara Ishfaq is sharing her story to try and raise awareness of birth injuries, particularly among women of South Asian heritage.
Previous research from birth injury charity The MASIC Foundation found that around one in 20 first-time mums suffer an obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) – or severe tearing – during childbirth.
However, studies have also found women of Asian heritage are up to nine times more likely to suffer an OASI during vaginal birth than white women.

Zara was left with a devastating birth injury which remained undiagnosed for two years. She’s been left with ongoing bowel complications as a result, including needing to have a stoma fitted in 2025.
She’s, sadly, not alone in her plight. New NHS figures shared by The Guardian show the rate of women experiencing the most serious type of tear during childbirth is at the highest since monitoring began in 2020.
Zara suffered a life-changing birth injury after a three-day labour in December 2021 which resulted in her baby’s head becoming stuck. In the end, baby Aariz – her first baby – was delivered by forceps weighing 7.7 pounds. (Use of forceps has been linked to higher rates of anal sphincter injuries in birthing parents.)
The mum, from London, suffered a serious post-delivery bleed, losing around two litres of blood. She also experienced a perineal tear – a common issue for vaginal births. Roughly nine in 10 first-time mothers who give birth vaginally will have some sort of tear, graze or episiotomy, according to the NHS.
For most women, these tears are minor (usually called a “first-degree tear”) and heal quickly. A second-degree tear will typically require stitches, while a third- and fourth-degree tear may be deeper and therefore impact the anal sphincter muscle.
These injuries are known as OASI and typically need repair surgery. It can trigger bowel incontinence, which – in new mothers – can impact many aspects of life, from sex and work to socialising and bonding with their baby.
Zara’s tear was underestimated, and despite complaining of symptoms and attending medical appointments it took more than two years before she received a proper diagnosis, during which time her complications worsened.
“Over time my symptoms became worse and had a greater effect on my life and also my ability to bond with my baby,” she said.
“While my friends were meeting in the park and attending baby groups, I was barely able to leave the house. I struggled on, but the situation was dire.”
She began to experience changing bowel habits and by the following June, was going to the toilet more frequently and leaking, but was sent home with advice to do pelvic floor exercises.
In December that year, she complained of continuing symptoms and needing to wear an incontinence pad.
But it wasn’t until May 2024 that she finally received confirmation that the severity of the perineal tear she sustained at birth had been underestimated, and she would require an operation to try and repair the damage.
A year later she underwent surgery, but was left with ongoing bowel complications.
Zara has since had another baby, Elayna, but sadly the pregnancy wasn’t straightforward. “My second pregnancy was affected because of my symptoms,” she explained.
“I suffered with hyperemesis [gravidarum] – serious sickness. Because of my injuries it was coming out of both ends. I suffered with infections and at one point developed sepsis.”
She continued: “I feel so blessed and lucky to have my children and they’re adorable. However, that I had to go through the experience I did will always upset me.
“It’s not just the physical injuries that affect you, it’s the psychological toll of having a reduced quality of life. Too many women are suffering unnecessarily and more needs to be done to improve maternity care, but also break the taboo around birth injuries to mums.”
The parent is due to share her story at legal firm Irwin Mitchell’s South Asian Maternal Health Conference next spring, which focuses on tackling maternal health inequalities.
“The solution starts with listening to women,” she ended. “If birth injuries are recognised earlier, treated sooner, and taken seriously, fewer women will have to live for years with preventable suffering.”
Politics
6 Lessons An Affair Therapist Has Learned About Cheaters
Infidelity can be hard to discuss. But given that some estimates say 75% of men and 68% of women have engaged in some form of cheating at one point or another, chances are most of us are close to a “cheater”.
And Nicholas Rose, a counsellor, author, and psychotherapist who lists “affairs and betrayals” among his specialties, may see more than most.
We spoke about what he’s learned about cheaters, who he defines as “people who have sex or intimate romantic relationships with other people/partners when there is an agreement in place that a relationship is monogamous”, in his years of practice.
1) Many cheaters don’t see themselves as cheaters
Even though people committing infidelity know they’re doing it, the therapist told us their self-image might never align with their actions.
“Cheating is, by its definition, a bad thing; I’ve never yet met anyone who wanted to think of themselves as doing a bad thing and as a cheater,” he told HuffPost UK.
2) Cheating sometimes begets more cheating
The counsellor added that sometimes, the negative feelings a cheater may experience after their indiscretion can actually lead them further astray.
“The shame, guilt and pressure people can feel about having cheated [or] cheating often adds to the stress that sits behind the drive to be a cheater, leading to further cheating,” he suggested.
3) Cheaters often see themselves as victims
From the outside, the person who’s been cheated on has obviously been wronged. But the cheater’s mind can make that dynamic blurry and even invert it, Rose said.
“The narrative a cheater constructs around their cheating often justifies the behaviour through a victim’s perspective,” he explained.
It’s possible to “challenge that and call it out, however, compassion can be the most effective way to understand what has happened,” the therapist added.
4) Cheating can mean different things to different people
In general, Rose said, clear boundaries help. For instance, cheating can occur because partners have “not had the monogamy/non monogamy conversation”.
Additionally, “everyone’s relationship to ‘cheating’ is personal – for those who grew up in family systems where cheating occurred, there can be a normalisation and acceptance that means it has a different level of meaning, significance and emotion attached to it than for someone for whom cheating never occurred,” he added.
5) Cheating can be caused by unmet needs
Sometimes, cheating is an inappropriate way of dealing with unmet needs, the therapist said.
“Unfortunately, for many people, when cheating occurs, the conversation stays purely on the cheating and never gets to the unmet needs and how and if they might be met going forwards.
“A cheater can sometimes resort to cheating because all attempts to try and talk about their unmet needs have failed. In these cases the offended party/ies often carry a sense of unease and sometimes guilt knowing that they have needed to avoid something in the relationship previously.”
6) Cheaters can’t always explain themselves once they’ve been found out
“Often, when a cheater is found out, the guilt, shame, and fear of loss that surfaces can render the cheating partner into such an experience of fear and self-loathing that they are unable to help their partner understand what has happened,” Rose ended.
“The partner often sees this as an act of further betrayal… [but] the other is actually unable to respond.”
Couples’ counselling service Relate said it’s important to make time for yourself if you’ve been cheated on. Talk honestly with your partner, and think carefully about what you want to happen next. Speak to a therapist if needed.
Politics
The Odyssey: Why We’re Still Inspired By The Poem In 2026
Yes, it’s a very old and impressive text. But that doesn’t necessarily mean the modern-day successs of The Odyssey – a 24-book epic poem attributed to the Ancient Greek poet Homer – was ineviable.
Lykophron’s Alexandra, for instance, is one of the most “neglected” Ancient Greek poems, Professor Simon Hornblower writes. I don’t reckon there’s anywhere near as much buzz around “the greatest lyric poet of ancient Greece”, Pindar, as there is Homer, either.
In other words, “ancient” plus “a big deal in Ancient Greece” does not necessarily equal “relevant enough for a big-budget movie in 2026”.
So why has a 12,000-plus-line work, finished around 725–675 BCE, remained so present in the imagination of modern audiences that Christopher Nolan has created a massive-scale, star-studded flick about it?
HuffPost UK spoke to Jeffrey Carnes, an Associate Professor of Classics and Classical Civilisations at Syracuse University, about why we can’t let go of the centuries-old poem.
Why do we still read and make art about The Odyssey?
“The Odyssey has stuck with us so long because it has spectacular stories – Sirens, the Cyclops, Circe – that grab hold of our imaginations when we’re young,” Carnes explained.
“But it also has subtleties of characterisation and narrative that we don’t expect in a poem from 2,700 years ago: it tells a non-linear story, with focus on three separate characters (Odysseus, Penelope, and Telemachus), who all have their own, sometimes competing interests.
“In a poem of 24 books, Odysseus, the title character, doesn’t even appear until Book five!”
Then, there’s the fact that reading and talking about The Odyssey has passed down through generations.
“When we read it for the first time, we’re joining an age-old community of readers, and learning the really cool and important stuff that generations before us knew,” the expert said.
We might be surprised by how familiar the book’s main character, Odysseus, feels too.
He’s a ”strong character who knows what he wants, and will do whatever it takes to survive,” Carnes stated.
“Homer opens the poem calling him polytropos – tricky, the man of many ways – but immediately adds that ‘many were those whose cities he saw, whose minds he learned of.’
“When he gets in trouble – as with the Cyclops – it’s because he was too curious, and explored things he shouldn’t have. When the Sirens sing to him, what do they offer him? Knowledge. And only his clever trick of being tied to the mast kept him from running aground.”
Where do I even start if I want to read The Odyssey?
We asked Carnes what modern readers should do if they want to try reading the poem, but are a little put off by its length and/or language.
He said that while reading the Odyssey in 2026 might feel “off-putting, at least at first”, at least we can comfort ourselves that Ancient Greeks probably felt the same way.
“The story is told in an epic idiom that seemed old-fashioned to most of the Greeks who read it (a fifth-century Athenian would react to it the way we react to Shakespeare – difficult, but beautiful once you accept the challenges of reading it),” he shared.
Adaptations and retellings, like the upcoming Nolan movie, can be a great way to approach the text if you’re not sure yet.
When you start, be patient, and leave your expectations – as well as your 21st century ideals of morality – at the door.
“I was surprised when I first read it how little of the poem was devoted to the famous adventures (Cyclops, Sirens, and so on), and how that was neatly contained within books nine to 12. So what’s the rest of the poem about? Homecoming, recognition, revenge – and I was shocked that Odysseus murdered all the Suitors simply for eating his cattle,” Carnes told us.
“But in the world of the Odyssey this is considered the right thing to do – the gods approve of it, and urge his son Telemachus to participate in the revenge. (Anyone who suggests that Odysseus is troubled by this mass killing is missing the point of the story.)”
Ultimately, The Odyssey is “an epic, an adventure story, and a Greek audience roots for the destruction of evil characters in the same way that we root for the destruction of the villains in film noir, Westerns, or the [Marvel Comic Universe]”.
Politics
Andy Burnham Officially Becomes Labour Leader
Andy Burnham has officially been crowned as the leader of the Labour Party, meaning he is days away from being de facto prime minister.
The Makerfield MP will have to wait until Monday to formally take over from Keir Starmer in No.10, as a quirk in the rules means he could not take both titles on the same day.
Burnham ran uncontested to be the next leader of the largest party in the Commons with the support of more than 350 of Labour’s 403 MPs.
In his first speech as Labour leader, he promised he would help to give Brits “hope back”.
He said his supporters “heard the call from the people of Makerfield on behalf of forgotten places everywhere, up and down this country, for a return of the Labour they once knew”.
He added: “And now we answer that call. We will be that version of Labour again.”
Burnham, who has run three times to lead the party, promised he is “ready” to lead Labour now after his nine-year stint as Greater Manchester mayor.
He also praised Starmer for making the party electable after its shocking defeat in the 2019 general election.
He then began to outline what changes he wants to implement, promising: “Change starts with honesty.
“We must recognise that this generation of politicians, myself included, have failed to challenge a political culture and an economic model that simply doesn’t work well enough for ordinary people.
“Four decades of neoliberalism that began in the 1980s have not been kind to the places that built our party, nor to the communities across the UK in rural and coastal areas. So we pledge today to them to be better.”
He added that the public has given his party a “last chance” to implement change – and that he will take the country in a direction which is “distinctively Labour”.
Burnham made five promises to improve the party, too.
He said he would work to build a “new politics”, change Labour’s “political direction”, be a leader for the entirety of the UK, take power back from Westminster and Whitehall and work to stop Labour in-fighting.
Burnham has had a rapid ascent to Downing Street in recent months.
Support for the then-Greater Manchester mayor started to rise as Starmer’s successor after the party’s disastrous performance in the May elections in England, Scotland and Wales.
However, as he did not have a seat in the Commons, Burnham was not able to challenge Starmer’s premiership.
So Josh Simons, Makerfield MP, stood aside to trigger a by-election and give Burnham a chance to return to the Commons.
His comfortable victory over Reform UK last month only strengthened calls for Starmer to step down.
The prime minister subsequently resigned and Labour MPs rushed to endorse Burnham.
There is still plenty of mystery around what Burnham intends to do in office as he avoided any major press conferences and is yet to announce who he wants in his cabinet.
But he insisted today that he “has a plan” and that he will “not change”, staying loyal to his style.
“I have listened and learned as I have gone along, you’ll be pleased to know. And hopefully I’ve got better as a result,” Burnham said. “You can be sure of this: I know what I believe after 25 years as an elected Labour representative, and I know what I want to do with you all. I have a plan.
“What I also want you to know is I won’t change. I have a style and it’s my style. I will always stay close to the ground, close to the people.”
Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.
Politics
Politics Home Article | Government To Overhaul Civil Service Recruitment

The use of success profiles will be scrapped under changes to civil service recruitment (Alamy)
2 min read
Exclusive: The Cabinet Secretary is planning to overhaul civil service recruitment, scrapping the use of success profiles.
PoliticsHome understands that there will be a new model introduced that “emphasises skills and expertise”.
The expectation is that the move will more closely align civil service recruitment with the private sector and bring in more talent, PoliticsHome understands.
Currently, the civil service recruits using so-called “success profiles”, made up of “ability”, “technical”, “behaviours”, “strengths”, and “experience”. The civil service also has a set of defined “behaviours”, which “when demonstrated, are associated with job success”.
In an email to staff on Friday, Cabinet Secretary Antonia Romeo said: “We are going to start by scrapping success profiles, instead introducing a new model that emphasises skills and expertise – and will make further changes over the coming months.”
Romeo also said “to deliver for the public, my focus – and that of your Permanent Secretaries – has been to build a world-class civil service that is fit for the future.” The head of the civil service also referenced the Review into the organisation, performance and transformation of the permanent civil service”.
“The Review will define a clear vision for the civil service as a world-class organisation, delivering a onece-in-a-generation transformation.”
Romeo was appointed as the new Cabinet Secretary in February and is the first ever woman to hold the role. She replaced Sir Chris Wormald, who was awarded a peerage by the outgoing Prime Minister Keir Starmer earlier this week.
The civil service’s approach to recruitment has faced criticism in recent years for its rigidity, with the Institute for Government previously recommending the replacement of success profiles in order to test “more robustly whether applicants have the skills they say they do”.
The think tank has also criticised the current approach discouraging external candidates to apply for roles in the civil service.
The Cabinet Office has been contacted for comment.
Politics
Kennard: New book places America at the centre of global wars and fascism
In an interview with the Canary, author Matt Kennard has said that to understand geopolitics the US must be understood as the global centre of war and fascism. And he dates the current wildness of the world’s biggest terror state to the so-called ‘war on terror‘.
The Bush administration removed barriers that had prevented right-wing extremists entering the US military. Now they are running it – and at the top of both sides of US two-party politics:
View this post on Instagram
Kennard: “Extremists are at the wheel”
Kennard’s newly-updated book, Irregular Army, “shows how the ‘War on Terror’ pushed the US further into authoritarian extremism” because the US military relaxed its standards to meet elevated recruitment targets:
The War on Terror militarised American political life. It taught the public to accept permanent emergency, surveillance, secrecy, executive violence, and the idea that whole populations could be treated as enemies. That logic did not stay in Fallujah or Kandahar; it came home.
The book argues that the same wars that brutalised Iraqis and Afghans also degraded the institutions of the United States, especially the military, by turning it into an overstretched force willing to lower its standards in order to keep the imperial project going. In the new preface, this is linked directly to January 6, Trumpism, domestic extremism, and a political culture in which enemies are internal as well as external…
…The military needed bodies for Iraq and Afghanistan. Recruitment targets were missed. Standards were loosened. Waivers expanded. Recruiters looked away. Investigators warned about gangs and white supremacists. Graffiti, tattoos, symbols, and affiliations were visible.
Yet the wars continued, and manpower came first. When an institution repeatedly absorbs extremists because its mission requires them, that is not a series of isolated anomalies. That is a system revealing its priorities…
The evidence points to a hierarchy that understood the immediate manpower crisis and chose to prioritise troop numbers over the long-term consequences… the institutional posture became: ignore it unless it becomes impossible to ignore… That is not an accident; that is policy by neglect.
And the author concludes that, against a system built on deceit and secrecy, the best weapons against it are truth and awareness:
The truth still matters. That may sound simple, but the whole structure depends on concealment: hiding what is done abroad, hiding who is recruited, hiding the damage done to soldiers, civilians, and democracy itself.
I wrote that I hoped the book would rouse anger, because anger grounded in truth can become a reckoning. The United States is sick from these wars, but I do not think it is terminal. The hope lies in whistleblowers, anti-war veterans, investigators, journalists, organisers, and ordinary people refusing to let empire speak in their name.
That is why the Canary and Skwawkbox exist, and why authors like Kennard matter. Read the Canary’s review of Irregular Army and interview with Matt Kennard here.
Featured image via the Canary
By Skwawkbox
Politics
Kris Jenner Announces Her Mother And Kardashian Sisters’ Grandmother Has Died
Kris Jenner has announced that her mother, Mary Jo “MJ” Shannon, has died at the age of 91.
Paying her respects on Instagram, the reality TV matriarch and “momager” remembered her mum – the grandmother to her daughters Kourtney, Kim and Khloe Kardashian and Kendall and Kylie Jenner and son Rob Kardashian – as the “heart of our family”.
“Today, we said goodbye to my beautiful Mommy MJ,” Kris told her followers. “There are no words that could ever capture what she has meant to me or the heartbreak of having to say goodbye.
“My mom was the heart of our family. She taught me everything that truly matters… to love your family fiercely, to be kind, to show up for the people you love and to never take a single moment together for granted.
“She taught us that family is everything. She showed us how to love unconditionally and how to find joy in the little moments. She showed me how to face life’s challenges with resilience and faith.”
Kris continued: “Mom, thank you for every sacrifice you made, every piece of wisdom you shared, and every moment you loved us so completely. I will miss our daily talks, your smile, your laughter…
“Our hearts are broken, but we find comfort knowing that love like yours never truly leaves us. Your love will live on in our family, in our traditions, in every moment we are together, and in every life you touched. When I look at my kids and my grandkids, I will forever see pieces of you in all of us. There is not a part of me that isn’t shaped by you.”

Kris’ daughters have since also posted their own tributes, with Kim writing: “You truly were the matriarch of our family, and your love is woven into all of us.”
She added: “You will always be a part of me, I love you soooooo much and I will miss you forever and ever. YOU ARE THE BEST OF US!!!
“I know you are up in heaven, looking at all of our Instagram posts of you from your sneaky finsta account you would always use lol.”
Over the years, MJ appeared alongside her daughter and grandchildren numerous times on the reality shows Keeping Up With The Kardashians and The Kardashians.
In her lifetime, MJ married twice, first to Robert True Houghton, Kris’ father.
After they divorced in 1962, she married businessman Harry Shannon, who died in a car accident in the early 2000s.
In her tribute, Kim wrote that it was her grandmother who introduced her to the world of business.
“You were the woman who showed me what it meant to be a hardworking businesswoman,” Kim said. “You gave me my very first job at your store in San Diego and taught me lessons about work ethic, strength, and confidence that I’ve carried with me ever since. You always believed in me, championed me, and were my safe place.”
Politics
Trump’s Election Conspiracy Files Include Something He Doesn’t Want You To See
US President Donald Trump used his primetime address to the nation on Thursday to continue his favorite pastime of sowing doubt in the results of the 2020 presidential election – which he lost to Joe Biden.
During the speech, Trump announced that he had declassified documents and had them posted on the White House website. He claimed they show that China interfered in the election in 2020, and the “deep state” had it out for him. However, the heavily redacted document dump revealed intelligence that suggested something Trump probably didn’t want out in the open.
“As the 2020 election approaches, the IC has detected Chinese state-sponsored cyber actors targeting the former Vice President’s presidential campaign, probably to gather intelligence that could enable future operations,” the file entitled CIA Wire Memo Summer 2020 stated.
By “former Vice President’s presidential campaign,” the document meant Biden’s 2020 presidential run.
Another document included in Thursday’s batch claimed that Russia had also attempted to hurt Biden’s campaign.
“We assess that Russia is using a range of measures primarily to denigrate former Vice President Biden and what it sees as an anti-Russia establishment. For example, it is directing or encouraging proxies to spread claims about Vice President Biden. Some Kremlin-linked actors are also seeking to boost President Trump’s candidacy on social media,” stated the document entitled NICA (National Intelligence Council Assessment) Foreign Threats To 2020 US Election.
That same file said China “prefers that President Trump be defeated.”
Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.
-
Fashion7 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Nutriplenish Leave-In Conditioner
-
NewsBeat22 hours agoLondon Mayor Sadiq Khan handed a peerage by Keir Starmer alongside 15 other Labour figures… just days before the PM leaves No10
-
Crypto World2 days agoCFTC blocks Kalshi from unwinding Michigan trades after court order
-
Business1 day agoNvidia Stock Slips After Big Tuesday Rally as Huang Confirms Vera Rubin Chip Is Now in Production Today
-
Politics2 days agoYoung campaigners urge incoming PM to act on outdoor junk food ads
-
Entertainment2 days agoDisney’s Most Ambitious Failed Star Wars Attraction Is Coming to SDCC
-
News Videos3 days agoXRP BOMBSHELL… XRP OMBOARDED FOR TRANSACTIONS!!!
-
Tech3 days agoGet Your ESP32 Sunny Side Up With This Solar Dev Board
-
Crypto World17 hours agoInjective Submits SEC Transfer-Agent Registration to Onchain Ownership Records
-
Tech3 days agoDark Secrets Emerge When Jailbreaking LLMs
-
Business1 day agoPalantir Shares Rise After Expanded Nvidia Partnership and Fresh Analyst Upgrades Ahead of Earnings Day
-
Sports2 days agoNew Cornerback Enters Vikings Trade Rumor Mill
-
News Videos7 hours agoMoney | Class 12 Economics | CBSE Board Exam 2026-27
-
Business12 hours agoBanco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. (BBVA) Discusses Global Macro Environment and Economic Outlook for Core Markets Transcript
-
Tech4 days agoCloudflare Precursor Watches Your Mouse and Keyboard To Decide If You Are Human
-
News Videos4 days agohow to make coin bank box with cardboard #scienceproject #money #diy #shorts
-
Entertainment2 days agoVicki Gunvalson Defends Discussing Heather Dubrow’s Money
-
Crypto World3 days ago
Ripple, Coinbase, Circle Join Linux x402 Foundation to Help Shape AI Payments
-
Crypto World15 hours agoClaude Fable 5 Slips to Second in AI Coding Leaderboard
-
Business13 hours agoNephros, Inc. (NEPH) Discusses Evolving Water Safety Strategies and Expansion Beyond Filtration Transcript

You must be logged in to post a comment Login