Connect with us

NewsBeat

ISIS supporters arrested in Bolton raids jailed for life

Published

on

ISIS supporters arrested in Bolton raids jailed for life

Ringleader Walid Saadaoui, 38, planned to shoot countless Jewish people at a march against antisemitism in Manchester before hijacking an ambulance and driving to kill yet more people.

But his plans unravelled after he was arrested in the car park of the Last Drop Village Hotel in Bromley Cross on May 8, 2024 with a car full of AK-47 assault rifles he had planned to use for his attack.

He did not know at the time that one of his co-conspirators, a man known only as “Farouk”, had been an undercover operative who had been monitoring his activities all along.

After having been found guilty of preparing acts of terrorism at a trial at Preston Crown Court last year, Saadaoui was brought back to court this week to learn his fate.

Advertisement

Harpreet Sandhu KC, prosecuting, said: “These defendants were prepared to kill several hundreds of people by using four high-powered, military-grade AK47 assault rifles, two handguns and more than 900 rounds of ammunition.”

He added: “The impact of that which was planned would have been profound, it would have been significant, and it would have been far-reaching.”

Saadaoui sat on the dock dressed in a plain white shirt and tie as Mr Sandhu laid the scale of the plot bare to a packed courtroom at Preston Crown Court.

Saadaoui and Hussein hoped to take part in a huge shooting plot (Image: GMP)

Not with him was his co-conspirator Amar Hussein, 52, who had been arrested at the place he lived and worked at Salim Appliances in Great Lever on the same day as Saadaoui in 2024.

Advertisement

But sat with Saadaoui was his younger brother Bilel, 37, who had been found guilty of failing to disclose information about an act of terrorism.

Mr Sandhu told the court that Saadaoui and Hussein planned to strike “in the heart of the Jewish community in Manchester”.

Saadaoui’s plans included carrying out “reconnaissance” in Jewish areas and joining Jewish community Facebook groups to look for targets.

One of the weapons they planned to use (Image: GMP)

Mr Sandhu quoted Amanda Bomsztyk of the Community Security Trust who said: “The ever-present risk of terrorist attacks posed by antisemitism means that very few Jewish communal events can take place without high-level security”.

Advertisement

Mr Sandhu said Saadaoui had “prepared for martyrdom” by making sure his family were taken care of financially and visiting his mother in Tunisia one last time.

The court heard how Saadaoui had been receiving advice from high-ranking ISIS members and had a key to the group’s safehouse off Chorley Old Road, where he planned to store the weapons.

But the deadly plan never came to pass thanks to undercover operative Farouk, who Saadaoui first met at Queens Park after communicating online and believed to be a fellow ISIS supporter.

Walid Saadaoui and Amar Hussein in a car (Image: GMP)

Farouk monitored Saadaoui and Hussein’s activities throughout and ensured that the guns they received had been deactivated.

Advertisement

After a lengthy trial last year Saadaoui, of Crankwood Road, Abram and Hussein, of no fixed abode, were both convicted by a jury of preparing acts of terrorism.

Younger brother Bilel, of Fairclough Street, Hindley was found guilty by majority verdict of failing to disclose information about an act of terrorism.

Walid Saadaoui was the ring leader of the plot (Image: GMP)

Dr Felicity Gerry KC, defending Saadaoui, said that “despite asking for weapons Mr Saadaoui was unable to source them without Farouk”.

She said that her client’s role was ultimately less than that of the undercover operative Farouk.

Advertisement

But Dr Gerry said: “Saadaoui had asked her to apologise on his behalf to the Jewish community and the “wider community at large”.

She said this for the antisemitic things he said in recordings of his conversations, though he still denied having prepared terrorist acts. 

Danny Robinson KC, for Hussein, says his client asked him to deliver no mitigation or submissions on his behalf.

Ali Naseem Bajwa KC, for Bilel Saadaoui, said he “had a general idea of terrorist activity” that involved a death and that something significant was going to happen on May 8, 2024.

Advertisement

He said there was “little or no risk” that the terror attack would have been carried out, given that the elder Saadaoui had been seemingly constantly monitored. 

Mr Bajwa told the court Bilel had no previous convictions, had positive character references and that he has “relatives very dear to him”.

But The Honourable Mr Justice Mark Wall reminded the defendants, including Hussein, who he said had shown his “cowardice” by not attending, how devastating the attack would have been.

Advertisement

He said: “I am sure that you intended to use AK47 Kalashnikov automatic weapons to launch a terror attack on the streets of Manchester.”

He added: “Your attack would have led to the deaths of people of all ages, including children.”

Mr Justice Wall said that Saadaoui and Hussein were both “fervent supporters of ISIS” and that their victims would have been “unarmed and defenceless”.

Walid Saadaoui, Amar Hussein and Bilel Saadaoui have all been jailed (Image: GMP)

He said: “Had you been successful in carrying out this plan, this would likely have been one of the deadliest terror attacks ever carried out on UK soil.”

Advertisement

Mr Justice Wall concluded Saadaoui and Hussein had been “very close” to being able to carry out their plan.

He said the date of it appeared to have been whenever the Jewish community of Greater Manchester held their latest march.

Saadaoui showed no visible reaction as Mr Justice Wall sentenced him to life in prison with a minimum term of 37 years.

The absent Hussein was sentenced to life in prison with a minimum term of 26 years.

Advertisement

Bilel Saadaoui has also been jailed (Image: GMP)

Younger brother Bilel was jailed for six years and went down to the cells in silence.

Speaking outside court after the hearing, Assistant Chief Constable Rob Potts said: “Today’s sentencing brings a conclusion to one of the most significant terrorist plot disruptions we have seen in the UK for several years.

“Walid Saadaoui and Amar Hussein intended to target members of the Jewish community in an evil act born out of hate and intolerance.

“If they had been successful, then what followed would have been devastating and potentially one of the deadliest terrorist attacks to ever take place on UK soil.

Advertisement

Walid Saadaoui plotted to smuggle weapons to the UK (Image: GMP)

“Walid was the ringleader.

“Through conversations with an undercover operative, we know – in detail – the extremist views that he held. He was the driving force behind the plot and he recruited Hussein to join him.

“He claimed during the trial that he was merely paying lip service and actually intended to sabotage his own plot at the last minute. This account is FAR from the truth.

“In Hussein he found a like-minded individual who did not need to be convinced to join. Hussein spoke openly to detectives following his arrest about his support of ISIS and cast judgement on others who did not hold the same extremist views that he held.

Advertisement

“Walid also discussed the plot and the action he had been taking openly with his brother, Bilel.

Walid and Bilel Saadaoui (Image: GMP)

“Although Bilel was not an active participant in preparations for the plot, the fact he knew what was planned but chose to remain silent makes him as guilty as the others.

“Being aware of a plan to cause such devastation and knowing that you could act to prevent it, but choosing not to, is simply not good enough.

“Our overwhelming priority during this proactive operation was ensuring public safety and we never lost sight of that.

Advertisement

“Each decision we made was rooted in this principle and the operation was highly controlled and resourced throughout.

“It was important for us to build the strongest possible case to take these dangerous men off the streets for a significant period of time and protect the public from them long-term.

“As evidenced by the sentences passed today, we have achieved that.

“I want to thank all those involved in this operation. We’ve worked with colleagues across CT and local policing, partner agencies and community organisations. The scale of the operation has been huge, and we would not be here without everybody’s efforts.

Advertisement

“I’d also like to express my sincere gratitude to the undercover operative who put himself in significant danger each time he met with two would-be terrorists.

“At any point he could have become a target himself, but he risked his personal safety in the name of wider public protection.

“This case has taken place at a time of heightened concern and anxiety within the Jewish community.

“The trial began the week after the appalling terrorist attack that took place in Greater Manchester and concluded soon after the Bondi Beach attack in Sydney.

Advertisement

“We have worked closely with stakeholders, including the Community Security Trust, throughout proceedings to address any concerns and provide reassurance.

“We will continue to do so and we remain dedicated to making sure all communities feel safe from the threat of terrorism and bringing those who would seek to harm them to justice.

“I hope that the significant outcome from this highly resourced, proactive investigation underlines that commitment.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NewsBeat

Ros Atkins on… Mandelson and the vetting system

Published

on

Ros Atkins on... Mandelson and the vetting system

The scandal surrounding Peter Mandelson and his association with the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein has prompted questions about the process that led to Mandelson becoming the UK’s US ambassador.

Candidates are vetted for ambassadorial roles, but the decision to appoint is taken by the government.

The prime minister has indicated that the process needs to change in the wake of fresh claims about Mandelson, who was sacked from the post in September 2025.

Files released in the US contain emails which appear to suggest he forwarded on market-sensitive information to Epstein when he was business secretary under then PM Gordon Brown in 2009.

Advertisement

The Metropolitan Police has launched an investigation into allegations of misconduct in public office. The BBC understands Mandelson’s position is that he has not acted in any way criminally and that he was not motivated by financial gain.

He has previously expressed his regret at continuing his relationship with Epstein after his 2008 conviction and apologised to his victims.

The BBC’s Analysis Editor Ros Atkins has more.

Produced by Katerina Karelli. Graphics by Jacqueline Galvin.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

A Russian drone strike kills 1 in Odesa ahead of US-brokered peace talks in Geneva

Published

on

Shootings at school and home in northeastern British Columbia leave 10 dead, including shooter

KYIV, Ukraine (AP) — A Russian drone strike on the Ukrainian city of Odesa killed one person, officials said Saturday, ahead of fresh talks next week aimed at ending the war.

The drone hit a residential building in the Black Sea port city, leaving an older woman dead, Ukraine’s State Emergency Service said Saturday.

On Friday, a Ukrainian missile strike killed two people and wounded five in the Russian border city of Belgorod, according to regional Gov. Vyacheslav Gladkov.

Meanwhile, another round of U.S.-brokered talks between envoys from Russia and Ukraine will take place next week in Geneva, days ahead of the fourth anniversary of the all-out Russian invasion of its neighbor, officials in Moscow and Kyiv said on Friday.

Advertisement

The discussions will be held on Tuesday and Wednesday, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said in a statement carried by Russian news agencies.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s communications adviser, Dmytro Lytvyn, confirmed the new round of negotiations.

The talks take place against a backdrop of continued fighting along the roughly 1,250-kilometer (750-mile) front line, relentless Russian bombardment of civilian areas of Ukraine and the country’s power grid, and Kyiv’s almost daily long-range drone attacks on war-related assets on Russian soil.

Previous U.S.-led efforts to find consensus on ending the war, most recently two rounds of talks in Abu Dhabi, the capital of the United Arab Emirates, have failed to resolve difficult issues, such as the future of Ukraine’s Donbas industrial heartland that is largely occupied by Russian forces.

Advertisement

Zelenskyy said last week that the United States has given Ukraine and Russia a June deadline to reach a deal. Previous deadlines given by U.S. President Donald Trump have passed largely without consequence.

___

Follow AP’s coverage of the war in Ukraine at https://apnews.com/hub/russia-ukraine

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Rubio expresses desire to maintain trans-Atlantic relations despite increasing rift

Published

on

Rubio expresses desire to maintain trans-Atlantic relations despite increasing rift

MUNICH (AP) — U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio offered a friendly and reassuring assessment of America’s relations with Europe under President Donald Trump’s administration, saying Saturday that the blunt tone of previous criticisms was intended to spur a renaissance in trans-Atlantic ties.

Rubio addressed the Munich Security Conference a year after Vice President JD Vance stunned the same audience with a harsh critique of European values. On Friday, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz opened this year’s gathering by calling for the United States and Europe to “repair and revive trans-Atlantic trust together,” saying that even the U.S. isn’t powerful enough to go it alone in an world whose old order has withered.

Rubio argued that the “euphoria” of the Western victory in the Cold War led to a “dangerous delusion that we had entered ‘the end of history,’ that every nation would now be a liberal democracy, that the ties formed by trade and by commerce alone would now replace nationhood … and that we would now live in a world without borders where everyone became a citizen of the world.”

Taking a much less confrontational approach than Vance last year, he acknowledged that the Trump administration has been pointedly direct in asserting its positions, but made clear that it won’t back off them.

Advertisement

“We made these mistakes together and now together we owe it to our people to face those facts and to move forward to rebuild,” Rubio said.

“Under President Trump, the United States of America will once again take on the task of renewal and restoration,” he said. “This is why we Americans may sometimes come off as a little direct and urgent in our counsel. This is why President Trump demands seriousness and reciprocity from our friends here in Europe.”

“In a time of headlines heralding the end of the trans-Atlantic era, let it be known and clear to all that this is neither our goal nor our wish,” Rubio said. “Because for us Americans, our home may be in the Western hemisphere, but we will always be a child of Europe.”

“We have fought against each other, then reconciled, then fought and reconciled again. And we have bled and died side-by-side on battlefields from Kapyong to Kandahar,” Rubio said. “And I’m here today to make it clear that America is charting the path for a new century of prosperity. and that once again, we want to do it together with you, our cherished allies and our oldest friends.”

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

EasyJet in bag war with NHS doctor thrown off flight

Published

on

Daily Mirror

Dr Vana Katsomitrou was boarding a flight to Spain on Christmas Eve but was told she wasn’t getting on after a baggage row – the doctor said she was only refunded £13

An NHS doctor has rowed with EasyJet and claimed the budget airline threw her off a flight over her baggage – despite her luggage fitting in the box.

Advertisement

Dr Vana Katsomitrou travelled to London Luton Airport for a four-night holiday in Alicante, Spain, with just hand luggage but her trip turned into chaos before it started. The doctor was due to fly on Christmas Eve and said she was asked to put her bag into the sizer. Vana claimed the worker thought the bag was too big but the flyer alleged it fit “comfortably” inside the box. The doctor said she tapped an employee’s shoulder to show her the bag in the sizer but claimed the staff member “loudly” warned Vana not to touch her.

The doctor claimed the EasyJet employee “shouted” at her and accused the traveller of harassment before saying the doctor could not board the flight to Spain.

Vana said she then apologised and offered to pay the £60 luggage charge but was still banned from getting on her £160 flight to Alicante, the day before Christmas.

Advertisement

EasyJet has since confirmed Vana removed items from her bag to enable it to fit in the measuring box. However they said she was then “disruptive” so not allowed to fly.

Vana, from Wembley Park, London, said: “I had booked a trip for a few days with some of my girlfriends to spend Christmas together in Spain. My friends were already there but I was working so I was going to find them in Spain. It was only for three days so I had a backpack with a few clothes.

“I went to the airport and there was this woman who was quite aggressive with the people boarding and she had an attitude. She was asking people to pay for their luggage because it was too big. She stopped me too and said my backpack was too big and didn’t fit in the box.

Advertisement

“I took out a denim jacket and put it on. The bag fit the box very comfortably. She turned her back on me and I touched her on her arm to show her the bag fits. At that moment she started shouting ‘don’t touch me.’ She told me that I harassed her.

“I begged them because it was Christmas Eve, I wanted to spend Christmas with friends. I said ‘if I did something that offended you, I apologise’, and she said she did not accept my apology. They didn’t let me on the plane.

“There were no more flights and I spent Christmas alone. They ruined my Christmas. She was so angry and annoyed at me. It’s like she was annoyed that she was working Christmas Eve and wanted to ruin everyone else’s time. I wasn’t aggressive at all.”

Advertisement

Vana complained to EasyJet and said they responded saying a member of staff had claimed to have “felt threatened”, so Vana was not allowed to board. They then said they were unable to disclose the outcome “for security reasons” – but told her to “rest assured” they took her feedback seriously. She was also given a £13 refund.

Vana has vowed to never fly with EasyJet again unless it is a matter of “life and death”. She said: “I’m really careful about how I speak to people, I work for the NHS and I’m always careful not to say something that will offend people. After that I complained online asking for compensation and they sent me an email explaining their policy.

“I said I would like to appeal and sent them photo evidence. There is no evidence I threatened a member of their team. Even the airport allocator said they didn’t see or hear me threaten anyone.

Advertisement

“They got back to me and refused. They said I was disruptive. I was in shock. I had paid for an Uber there and back. We had paid for the Airbnb, and I had booked a taxi from the airport. I felt awful and exhausted. I’d never fly with EasyJet again unless it is a matter of life and death.”

An EasyJet spokesperson said: “Our ground crew will check that bags are within the maximum dimensions to ensure they fit where they need to be stowed in the cabin and in fairness to customers who have booked to bring additional luggage. As Ms Katsomitrou behaved disruptively towards our team at the gate, she was refused travel. We do not tolerate abusive or threatening behaviour towards our staff.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Gordon Ramsay addresses Victoria Beckham ‘inappropriate’ wedding dance claims

Published

on

Gordon Ramsay addresses Victoria Beckham 'inappropriate' wedding dance claims
Gordon Ramsay has set the record straight on Brooklyn Beckham’s wedding with Nicola Peltz (Picture: Getty)

Gordon Ramsay has offered his version of events at Brooklyn Beckham’s infamous wedding, including whether Victoria ‘inappropriately’ danced.

Last month, Brooklyn Beckham launched a brutal takedown of his parents on social media, which came after over a year of reports there was tension in the family.

In his explosive 800-word statement, Brooklyn accused his parents of trying to ‘control’ him and ‘ruin’ his relationship with wife Nicola Peltz, 31.

He went on to write that he ‘did not want to reconcile’ with his family, with it emerging he’d also blocked his brothers Romeo, 23, and Cruz, 20, on social media.

Advertisement

Among these claims, Brooklyn also alleged that Victoria ‘hijacked’ his wedding and danced ‘inappropriately’ in front of everyone, ‘humiliating’ him.

However, discussing the wedding which he attended along with his family, Michelin-starred chef Gordon gave his version events.

MADRID, SPAIN - DECEMBER 10: Chef Gordon Ramsay attends Esquire
The Michelin-starred chef spoke about his ‘close friends’ ahead of his new Netflix documentary (Picture: Getty Images)
BURBANK, CALIFORNIA -JANUARY 23, 2026: Iconic chef and TV personality Gordon Ramsay appears on
Gordon said that he knows how much David loves Brooklyn (Picture: Getty Images)

Speaking to The Sun ahead of his new Netflix documentary Being Gordon Ramsay, Gordon said: ‘We were there at the wedding. There was nothing salacious. There was nothing inappropriate. Everyone was having fun, having a dance.’

Asked whether Victoria ‘grinded’ on Brooklyn, he added: ‘No! Nothing of the sort. It was fun.’

The chef went on to say that the former Spice Girl has a ‘great sense of humour’, but she would be ‘right to upset’ about the wedding.

Advertisement

The 59-year-old Kitchen Nightmares star also said that he is still in contact with the eldest Beckham child, Brooklyn.

Explaining how they have ‘messaged a little bit’ and have a ‘solid relationship’, Gordon said he loves Brooklyn and his ‘heart is incredible’ but warned that it’s hard ‘when you’re infatuated’.

‘I’ve seen first hand just how good parents they are. David as a dad is just incredible. They have both put so much energy into their kids, and I know just how many times they have got Brooklyn out of the s***.’

‘I think it’s going to be a matter of time before Brooklyn takes a good look at himself and understands just what his parents mean to him.

Advertisement

‘He’s desperate to forge his own way, and I respect that from Brooklyn. It’s such a good thing to do. But remember where you came from. And honestly, one day you’re not going to have your mum and dad, and you need to understand that. That penny will drop.’

‘I just want Brooklyn to take a moment to himself. And remember: You’re half mum, half dad. And you’re an amazing young man. But, boy, they’ve done more for you than anyone did in your entire life. Time’s going to be the best healer, and David will absolutely get that relationship back on track.’

Got a story?

If you’ve got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the Metro.co.uk entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@metro.co.uk, calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we’d love to hear from you.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

What TV channel is Ireland v Italy on in Six Nations today? Kick-off time and more

Published

on

Belfast Live

All you need to know ahead of Ireland vs Italy in the Six Nations on Saturday – kick-off time, TV channel, live stream, team news, head-to-head, odds

Ireland are set to face Italy at the Aviva this afternoon, hoping to bounce back from a disappointing start against France in Paris last week.

Advertisement

Andy Farrell has made six changes to the team that lost to France, with Robert Baloucoune, James Lowe, James Ryan, Cormac Izuchukwu and Jack Conan joining the line-up, whilst Caelan Doris moves from no8 to no7.

In contrast, Italy arrive in Dublin on a high after defeating Scotland in Rome last Saturday.

Five of their starting XV play for clubs outside Italy – Monty Ioane (Lyon), Paolo Garbisi (Toulon), Danilo Fischetti (Northampton), Giacomo Notera (Stade Francais) and Andrea Zambonin (Exeter).

Here’s what you need to know about the match:, reports the Irish Mirror.

Advertisement

Who: Ireland vs Italy.

What: 2026 Six Nations Championship.

Where: Aviva Stadium, Dublin.

When: Saturday, Feb 14th.

Advertisement

Kick-off time? 2.10pm.

Referee: Hollie Davidson (Scotland), who is set to become the first woman to referee a men’s Six Nations game.

Did you know?

Ireland and Italy have faced off 73 times; Ireland have won 69 times, whilst Italy have claimed victory four times.

Advertisement

Other second round matches include: Scotland vs England at Murrayfield, and Wales vs France on Sunday at 3.10pm.

First round results were: France 36-14 Ireland; Italy 18-15 Scotland; England 48-7 Wales.

Quotes corner.

Andy Farrell (Ireland coach): “We just happen to have lost a lot of experience and people are coming in. We have a lot of new caps and certainly a lot of players under 10 caps particularly

Advertisement

“They have to go through this and they have to go through Paris to learn, along with the players that we have not got that are injured and the players who we are giving this experience to down the track. You always have to go through a little bit of pain to get to that point in all generations.”

Italy’s Coach, Gonzalo Quesada, commented on the victory over Scotland: “It’s yet another demonstration of our maturity. The players who had been used less often performed very well. We showed great character. We never let the expectations placed on us influence us.

“It’s nice to raise expectations ahead of Ireland, to make calculations, to think about future results. This happens when you sense that great results are possible, but we know where we still need to improve and we must keep our feet on the ground.”

Ireland’s number 8, Jack Conan, reflected: “I don’t know if fallout is the right word, but yeah, look, we weren’t at the level at all, were we? I think physically more than anything else with our intent, I think we allowed them 18 offloads or something like that. And with a team like that, when they get in behind you, they’re really hard to stop. So I think our probably physical intent was the area that let us down the most.”

Advertisement

Did you know?

The last three encounters saw Ireland triumph 22-17 in Rome 2025, 36-0 in Dublin 2024 and 33-17 in Rome in 2023.

Betting odds: Ireland 1/12. Draw 40/1.

Italy 15/2.

Advertisement

Handicap: Ireland -16 points.

Six Nations outright odds: France 1/2, England 21/10, Ireland 30/1, Scotland 35/1, Italy 75/1, Wales 500/1.

Popular Bets include: Dan Sheehan as first try-scorer at 6/1, anytime try-scorer at 4/6; Craig Casey as Man of the Match at 11/1; Tommaso Menoncello as Man of the Match at 33/1; Each team to score seven or more points in each half at 9/4.

The match on Saturday will be broadcast live on Virgin Media One and ITV. Live radio commentary will be available on RTE Radio 1.

Advertisement

Team Line-Ups:.

Ireland: Jamie Osborne; Robert Baloucoune, Garry Ringrose, Stuart McCloskey, James Lowe; Sam Prendergast, Craig Casey; Jeremy Loughman, Dan Sheehan, Thomas Clarkson, Joe McCarthy, James Ryan, Cormac Izuchukwu, Caelan Doris (capt), Jack Conan.

Replacements: Ronan Kelleher, Tom O’Toole, Tadhg Furlong, Edwin Edogbo, Tadhg Beirne, Nick Timoney, Jamison Gibson-Park, Jack Crowley.

Italy: Lorenzo Pani; Louis Lynagh, Tommaso Menoncello, Leonardo Marin, Monty Ioane; Paolo Garbisi, Alessandro Fusco; Danilo Fischetti, Giacomo Nicotera, Simone Ferrari, Niccolò Cannone, Andrea Zambonin, Michele Lamaro (capt), Manuel Zuliani, Lorenzo Cannone,.

Advertisement

Replacements: Tommaso Di Bartolomeo, Mirco Spagnolo, Muhamed Hasa, Federico Ruzza, Riccardo Favretto, David Odiase, Alessandro Garbisi, Paolo Odogwu.

Click here to sign up to our sport newsletter, bringing you the latest sports news, headlines and top stories.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Scotland v England: Visitors can mint new era in Six Nations tie

Published

on

Finn Russell

Because England’s winning streak started with some streaky wins.

Victory over France in round two of last year’s Six Nations was delivered, in part, by Gallic butterfingers.

The one-point win over Scotland a fortnight later would have been defeat had Russell nailed a final-play conversion shot.

After closing out that Six Nations campaign with wins over Italy and Wales, England, without 14 British and Irish Lions, impressed by beating Argentina twice on a two-Test tour.

Advertisement

But the Pumas, run ragged by the 12-month demands on their star players, were also at less than full strength.

Victory over New Zealand was the centrepiece of England’s autumn, but the subsequent sacking of Scott Robertson suggested that the All Blacks were not taking up tools with their usual gusto.

England’s current run has been built around Twickenham. Can they go on the road and break the hex that Scotland have held over them in recent years?

If not, back-to-back away trips to the Stade de France and Ellis Park to play France and South Africa in March and July respectively suddenly look a whole lot more daunting.

Advertisement

There are some relative Test rookies in their line-up. Henry Arundell is much improved in defence, but was barely tested against Wales last week. Tommy Freeman is learning on the job at centre, a potential opening that Sione Tuipulotu and Jones will attempt to exploit. Guy Pepper, eight caps deep, will be a target for wily opposite number Jamie Ritchie.

Elsewhere Luke Cowan-Dickie can wobble on the oche at line-out time, while England’s replacements did not accelerate away from Wales as Borthwick might have hoped, with the hosts shading the second half by a relatively narrow 19-7.

They are minor quibbles. Certainly in comparison to Scotland’s.

Gregor Townsend’s men were stung by a defeat by Italy that might signal the beginning of the end for both a coach and a generation of stellar players.

Advertisement

But, those happier, more distant memories are also still resident in their line-up.

Two names remain from the 23 who beat England eight years ago – Russell, who threw the pass, and Jones, who caught it.

England must break that link to the past.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

The cheapest spots for petrol in Northern Ireland as prices remain low

Published

on

Belfast Live

Petrol prices recorded a new five year low last week

The price of petrol in Northern Ireland remains low after reaching its cheapest price in five years last week.

Advertisement

Forecourt fuel pumps were recording an average of 124.2p per litre for petrol last week, the lowest level since May 2021. Prices this week are up very slightly, but remain low at an average of 124.3p per litre.

Petrol prices vary depending on location around Northern Ireland and even between retailers. The price is made up of several factors, including when fuel was purchased by retailers and the volume bought at a given price.

READ MORE: Minister announces above-inflation rise in regional domestic rates as Cost of Living crisis continuesREAD MORE: How to find cheapest petrol near you as Northern Ireland prices reach new five year low

This week, the Consumer Council’s Fuel Price Checker shows Newtownabbey is the cheapest place to fill up at the pumps, for both petrol and diesel. Petrol prices here are an average of 122.4p per litre (1.9p below the regional average). Diesel prices in the area are an average of 128.4p per litre (3.6p below average).

Advertisement

The most expensive place in Northern Ireland for petrol this week is Strabane, where the average is 126.9p per litre (2.6p above the Northern Ireland average). For diesel, Newry has the most expensive prices, with the average price of one litre coming in at 135.9p (3.9p above average).

The highest recorded average prices for fuel were in June 2022, following the Russian invasion of Ukraine, at 189.9 per litre for petrol and 197.5 per litre for diesel.

On February 2, the UK Government launched their Fuel Finder Scheme which means that forecourts across the UK must submit their pricing information and notify within 30 minutes of any price change at the pump.

Commenting on the Fuel Finder Scheme, Head of Transport Policy at the Consumer Council, Michelle Kelly, said: “We welcome this open data scheme which is a significant extension of the type of transparency the Consumer Council has sought to create for Northern Ireland consumers through our Fuel Price Checker.”

Advertisement

Want to see more of the stories you love from Belfast Live? Making us your preferred source on Google means you’ll get more of our exclusives, top stories and must-read content straight away. To add Belfast Live as a preferred source, simply click here.

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Can wild swimming unite communities against single-use plastics?

Published

on

Can wild swimming unite communities against single-use plastics?

As ministers propose new bathing waters across England, swimmers, councils, brands and campaigners are beginning to align around a shared goal – cutting single-use plastic at source

Communities across England could soon benefit from thirteen new designated bathing water sites, in what ministers describe as a significant expansion of safe, monitored places to swim.

Among the proposals is the first ever designated bathing spot on the River Thames in London at Ham and Kingston – a stretch of river once declared biologically dead in the 1950s because of pollution. Today, it is being put forward as a symbol of renewal.

Advertisement

If approved, the additions would bring the total number of bathing waters in England to 464. Last year, 93% met acceptable standards for swimming, with four in five rated either ‘excellent’ or ‘good’. The proposals follow reforms to the Bathing Water Regulations intended to modernise monitoring and better reflect how people actually use rivers, lakes and beaches.

Solutions every Saturday
Uplift your inbox with our weekly newsletter. Positive News editors select the week’s top stories of progress, bringing you the essential briefing about what’s going right.
Sign up

Outdoor swimming in England is no longer a fringe pursuit but is becoming part of civic identity, and with it comes a new kind of environmental leverage.

On a cold January morning in Brighton, swimmers gathered at Sea Lanes – the national open water swimming centre built directly on the beach – pulling on wetsuits and adjusting goggles before heading into the Channel. Others opted for the heated 50-metre outdoor pool that runs parallel to the shoreline.

Advertisement

Sea Lanes, which opened only three years ago, is thriving and has recently announced plans for similar facilities to open later this year in Portsmouth and in London, where construction has started on a floating natural water pool at Eden Dock in Canary Wharf.  

Construction on a new pool at Eden Dock in Canary Wharf. Image: Jess Hurd

Advertisement

In Brighton, swimmers emerging from the sea were handed hot drinks in refillable bottles rather than disposable ones. The giveaway was organised by frank green, an Australian-founded reusable bottle brand that has made open water swimming central to its UK campaign this year. The event was supported by MINI, whose electric Countryman formed part of the backdrop – a low-emissions model positioned around similar environmental values.

The message was about normalising and rewarding refill culture in places where single-use plastic has long been the default.

Dan Roberts, head of UK for frank green, believes swimming offers a cultural turning point. “We’re encouraging people to reconnect with the water but at the same time plastic waste is still ending up in those same waters,” he says. “If this movement is going to grow responsibly, the environment has to be front and centre.”

Advertisement

In England, the average adult buys around 175 single-use plastic bottles each year. Roughly 7.7bn plastic bottles are sold annually, with an estimated 3.5bn used for water, according to a House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee report. Only a fraction are recycled. Around 80% of marine litter is plastic, and bottles are the second largest contributor and drinks containers remain among the most common items found in coastal clean-ups.

The question is whether a visible, growing swimming culture can accelerate policy change. There is precedent. In 2019, the Isle of Skye became one of the first places in the UK where local retailers voluntarily stopped selling single-use plastic water bottles following a community campaign. Across Europe and parts of the United States, national parks, cities and cultural institutions have introduced partial or full bans on single-use plastic bottles, replacing them with refill infrastructure. 

Roberts argues that behaviour change depends on convenience. “We can’t just tell people to do better,” he says. “Convenience drives behaviour, so it’s integral that carrying refillable bottles becomes part of our culture. But there also has to be infrastructure – water fountains, public refill stations – to support it.”

If this movement is going to grow responsibly, the environment has to be front and centre

Funding that infrastructure is where collaboration might lead to change. In Brighton, the Pride in Place programme has awarded the city £20 million over ten years to support regeneration and public realm improvements. Community leaders will help decide where that money is spent and expanding refill points along the seafront could sit within that framework, alongside potential public-private partnerships in which brands contribute funding or equipment.

Advertisement

Community groups are alert to the risks of superficial alignment. Organisations such as Leave No Trace Brighton have previously made clear they only want to work with partners whose environmental commitments run deeper than marketing.  

That alignment is beginning to take shape on the south coast. Sea Lanes provides facilities. The council shapes infrastructure. Brands push culture change and campaign groups maintain scrutiny. 

Brighton’s Big Swim is expected to bring together more than 1,000 women in March, to mark International Women’s Day and raise funds for Surfers Against Sewage.  

Advertisement

We’re turning a joyful sea dip into a powerful call to end pollution,” says event organiser and Surfers Against Sewage ambassador Nicky Chisholm.

Individually, refusing a plastic bottle is a small act, but shifts in culture may force councils to go further – whether through restricting sales in sensitive areas, expanding refill networks or embedding plastic reduction into regeneration plans.

The rise of outdoor swimming will not solve England’s plastic problem on its own but as access to designated bathing waters expands, rivers and coastlines become shared spaces, protected by the people who use them.

Advertisement

On Brighton beach, swimmers wrapped in towels cradled reusable bottles instead of disposable ones. A modest gesture that if scaled across England’s growing swimming community, could well shift culture and policy.

Main image: jax10289

Be part of the solution

At Positive News, we’re not chasing clicks or profits for media moguls – we’re here to serve you and have a positive social impact. We can’t do this unless enough people like you choose to support our journalism.

Advertisement

Give once from just £1, or join 1,800+ others who contribute an average of £3 or more per month. Together, we can build a healthier form of media – one that focuses on solutions, progress and possibilities, and empowers people to create positive change.

Support Positive News

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

‘Showdown’ between Andrew and William revealed in bombshell new book

Published

on

Daily Record

King Charles removed Andrew from public duties – but a new tell-all book says William has been at odds with his uncle for some time

William wanted Andrew banished and rowed with Charles over ‘stain on Royal Family’

A blistering new book reveals the truth behind the difficult relationship between Prince William and his uncle, Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor.

Advertisement

William & Catherine: The Intimate Inside Story’ has been wrriten by The Mirror‘s royal editor Russell Myers, drawing on his many years of experience following the royal couple. Set to be published on February 26, it’s the first joint biography of the Prince and Princess of Wales in more a decade.

The book reveals the blistering rows which have taken place behind closed doors as Andrew Mountbatten Windsor’s exile from the royal family has been years in the making. Following his ascension to the throne in September 2022, King Charles removed Andrew from public duties and stripped him of his HRH.

In October 2025 he delivered the final blow, evicting his disgraced younger brother and revoking his prince title, before unceremoniously kicking him out under the cover of darkness earlier this month. Now, he’s just a commoner, reports The Mirror.

Given the level of public outrage directed at Andrew through his association with Jeffrey Epstein, Charles was left with little option but to take decisive action. But it’s a decision his eldest son, Prince William, would have taken far earlier.

Advertisement

According to the author, William’s negative view of his uncle long predated his very public fall from grace. The prince saw Andrew as a ‘bit of an ignoramus’ and questioned what he actually did. “But it was more than that.

He’d seen how Andrew behaved in front of staff, ordering people about, the aggressive or dismissive manner, they’d never seen eye to eye,” Myers writes.

Advertisement

But it was the ex-duke’s association with convicted paedophile Epstein that proved insurmountable. William strongly believed that immediate action should be taken following Andrew’s now-infamous Newsnight interview in 2019. While, unbelievably, Andrew believed the interview had ‘gone well’, it was widely seen as a disaster – not just for the then-prince, but for the monarchy at large.

Myers reveals that in the aftermath, William spoke to his father to implore him and the late Queen to take action – fearing not only the public backlash but for his own future. Both William and Kate were angered by Andrew’s failure to apologise for his connection to Epstein, or acknowledge the victims of sexual abuse, the new book reveals. They are both said to be wholly aligned on the subject of Andrew.

A source told the author that William thought Andrew should be removed from the picture immediately ‘before the rot set in further’. “William’s view was that he [Andrew] got himself into the whole mess, so he should be left to his own devices to sort it out away from the family,” they said.

Advertisement

Then, in August 2021, more humiliation came for the monarchy. Virginia Giuffre, a victim of Epstein who died by suicide last year, filed a civil lawsuit against Andrew in New York, alleging sexual assault when she was 17. The case, filed under the Child Victims Act, proceeded despite attempts to dismiss it. As a result, in January 2022, the late Queen stripped her second son of his honorary military titles, royal patronages, and the use of the “His Royal Highness” (HRH) style. The case was ultimately settled out of court the following month, with the Queen, Prince Philip and the then-Prince Charles reportedly loaning Andrew £12million to pay Giuffre off.

Issues once again arose at Christmas time in 2023. The King extended an olive branch to Andrew and his ex-wife Sarah Ferguson and invited them both to Sandringham (it was Sarah’s first invite in 32 years).

Charles’s decision to bring his brother back into the family fold was something William fundamentally disagreed with and he challenged his father directly- however, a source with knowledge of the conversation said that William was “very much put in his place”.

Advertisement

But, as the prince predicted, the harmony was short-lived. The start of 2024 saw renewed and intense scrutiny following the unsealing of US court documents brought in 2015 by Andrew’s accuser Giuffre, against Ghislaine Maxwell, who procured underage girls for Jeffrey Epstein to abuse. It was claimed that then-Duke of York had indulged in ‘daily massages’ during frequent visits to Epstein’s Florida mansion. Allegations that he had taken part in an ‘underage orgy’ also resurfaced.

Outraged, William again implored the King to act, by stripping Andrew of his remaining titles and ‘banishing’ him from the family for good in order to protect the reputation of the institution. Charles, meanwhile, was believed to be attempting to honour the wishes of his late mother, the Queen, who believed that her second son would one day be exonerated. As such, he stopped short of pushing for his banishment. “By contrast, William made it clear that once he became king there would be no such mercy.”

One palace source told Myers: “His view was crystal clear, Andrew shouldn’t be anywhere near the family under any circumstances, not by association, not at family functions, anywhere. Every single time there was a new revelation, which no one knew when it was coming or what the next one would be, it was a stain on all of the family.”

Advertisement

Then, in October 2025, a newly leaked email showed that Andrew told Epstein ‘we are in this together’ after a picture of the royal with his arm around a teenage Virginia Giuffre was first published in 2011. The email appeared to contradict his previous claim on BBC Newsnight that he had ceased contact with the convicted child sex offender by that point.

Days later, Andrew announced he was giving up his titles, including the Duke of York, following “discussion with the King”. In a statement, he said that the “continued accusations about me distract from the work of His Majesty and the Royal Family “.

Then, at the end of that same month, came the final blow. Buckingham Palace confirmed that Andrew was losing his ‘Prince’ title, now becoming known as simply Andrew Mountbatten Windsor. The palace also said Andrew has been served formal notice to surrender his lease on Royal Lodge, his 30-room Windsor mansion.

Advertisement

Nevertheless, the ‘Andrew problem’ continues to haunt the royals. While he has now been whisked away to live in Sandringham, away from the public gaze, scandal continues to follow Andrew with the release of the most recent Epstein files. There are now calls for him to give evidence before the US Congress, while police have said they are investigating Andrew over reports he shared confidential reports from his role as the UK’s trade envoy with sex offender Epstein.

On 9 February, William and Kate broke their public silence over Andrew’s involvement in the Epstein files. A Kensington Palace spokesperson said: “I can confirm that the Prince and Princess of Wales have been deeply concerned by the continued revelations. Their thoughts remain focused on the victims.”

A short time later, Charles also issued a statement. “The King has made clear, in words and through unprecedented actions, his profound concern at allegations which continue to come to light in respect of Mr Mountbatten-Windsor’s conduct,” a Palace spokesman said. “While the specific claims in question are for Mr Mountbatten-Windsor to address, if we are approached by Thames Valley Police we stand ready to support them as you would expect.”

Advertisement

It’s clear there is no way back for Andrew, with both the King and his heir now aligned on the matter. The decision to evict him from Royal Lodge under the cover of darkness earlier this month reportedly came after an “urgent meeting” held between Charles and William at Sandringham. The final straw, according to royal sources, was the sight of Andrew trotting around the Windsor estate on his horse, and waving at members of the public.

The disgraced former Prince made his last appearance with the royal family when he attended the funeral of the Duchess of Kent at Westminster Cathedral on 16 September 2025, accompanied by his ex-wife, Sarah Ferguson. It was an extraordinary gathering. Andrew, laughing and smiling at times, was seen trying to strike up a conversation with William – to no avail.

Andrew, 65, continues to deny any wrongdoing. He is also said to be in complete denial about his dramatic fall from grace.

Extracted from WILLIAM AND CATHERINE by RUSSELL MYERS, published by Ebury Spotlight on February 26 at £22. Copyright © Russell Myers 2025.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025