Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

NewsBeat

Your legal rights if neighbour demands you to replace shared garden fence

Published

on

Daily Mirror

A homeowner has been left feeling frustrated after their neighbour asked them to replace their shared fence, arguing it’s in ‘a poor state’ – but what are their legal responsibilities?

No matter how well you might get on with your neighbours, there are certain topics that may cause some tension between households. This becomes especially common if you share things such as garden hedge, fences, or driveways.

Advertisement

Because of this, it’s important to know your rights as a homeowner, including which neighbour has responsibility over garden fences. This was one question one specific homeowner had, as they turned to Reddit’s ‘DIY UK’ forum seeking guidance after a neighbour requested they replace their shared fence, claiming it was in ‘a poor state’.

“After gauging my non-receptive reaction, he eventually offered to pay half. He’s currently having his garden done up,” the user wrote in their post. They went on to explain that they weren’t in a financial position to consider contributing towards a replacement fence, and argued they couldn’t see the necessity for one regardless.

“I think the fence is fine and definitely not in urgent need of replacement,” they said, sharing a photograph of the wooden fence in question, which appeared to be in decent condition, aside from some fading in the wood.

They then sought advice on how to handle the situation. However, having viewed the images of the fence, the majority of fellow Reddit users felt there was no real justification for replacing it.

Advertisement

One user wrote: “Fence looks fine, if the neighbour wants something different they’re welcome to put up their own fence on their side of yours. Sounds to me like they want to halve their cost of getting a new fence.”

“It’s your fence, if they don’t like it cover it with something they like, their side of the boundary,” a second person remarked, while a third added: “Unless the posts are wobbly there’s nothing wrong with it. Neighbour can stick their own fence up on their side.”

Who is legally responsible for a garden fence?

Garden fences are a frequent source of conflict between neighbours, particularly when it comes to repairs or replacements, with most rows centring on who bears legal responsibility. This largely depends on which side of the boundary line the fence sits on.

The answer can be found in the deeds and title plan for your property. If you don’t have these to hand, you can obtain a copy from the Land Registry.

Advertisement

You may spot a ‘T’ marked on one side of the boundary. This symbol indicates who is responsible for any maintenance required. If it appears on both sides of the boundary (resembling an ‘H’), this means both parties share joint responsibility. However, these symbols aren’t always present, which can make things considerably more complicated.

In such cases, a general rule of thumb is that whoever originally erected the fence will be responsible for its upkeep. A neighbour is only legally obliged to repair a fence under a handful of specific circumstances outlined in The Party Wall Act 1996.

These include:

  • if it poses a safety risk
  • if it creates a boundary hazard
  • if it is mandated by your specific property deeds or local laws

If your neighbour is legally responsible for maintaining the fence, you’ll need to seek their permission before making any changes to it, including hanging items on it or painting your side.

It’s worth noting that in the UK, there is no legal obligation to have fencing between neighbouring gardens, except in certain specific circumstances, such as properties bordering railways.

Advertisement

Should you find yourself struggling to resolve a boundary or fencing dispute with a neighbour, the best course of action is to seek advice from a boundary surveyor or solicitor, as they will be best placed to help you reach an agreement with your neighbours.

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

NewsBeat

Mid-air brawl’ forces UK-bound easyJet flight to return to Tenerife

Published

on

Mid-air brawl’ forces UK-bound easyJet flight to return to Tenerife

The captain decided to return to Spain about 30 minutes after departure “due to the danger” the fight “posed to the safety of the flight”, the air traffic controller said.

Police met flight EZY3352 when it touched down at Tenerife South airport on Tuesday evening, per the crew’s request.

The 186-passenger aircraft then continued to Liverpool.

Advertisement

The air traffic controller said in its statement, originally written in Spanish: “Our full support goes out to the crews and passengers who are increasingly having to endure these situations.”

EasyJet said the plane “returned to the airport and was met by police due to a group of passengers behaving disruptively.

“The flight then continued to Liverpool.”

The airline added: “Our cabin and ground crew are trained to assess all situations and to act quickly and appropriately to ensure that the safety of the flight and other customers is not compromised at any time.

Advertisement

“We take these incidents very seriously and do not tolerate disruptive behaviour towards our staff.

“The safety and wellbeing of customers and crew is always our highest priority.”

Air traffic control also said: “The crew of the flight from Tenerife South to Liverpool, after about 30 minutes of flight, informed us that they needed to return to the airport and requested police presence upon arrival.

“A group of about 10 passengers had started a fight on board, and the captain decided to return due to the danger it posed to the safety of the flight.

Advertisement

“We expedited their return as much as possible while coordinating with the airport for police presence.

“They landed and cleared runway 07 without incident.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Spennymoor man banned again after driving while disqualified

Published

on

Spennymoor man banned again after driving while disqualified

John Hallimond, of Weardale Street, Spennymoor, appeared at Peterlee Magistrates’ Court on July 17.

He pleaded guilty to driving a Kia Sportage while disqualified and without insurance on Market Place, Wolsingham, on July 16.

The court heard Hallimond had shown “a flagrant disregard for court orders”, which led magistrates to impose a six-week prison sentence, suspended for 12 months.

Advertisement

He must also complete up to 15 days of rehabilitation activities as instructed by his supervising officer.

In addition, Hallimond was banned from driving for 16 months and ordered to pay £85 in costs to the Crown Prosecution Service.

Hallimond’s early guilty plea was taken into account when imposing the sentence. 

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Ukraine’s secret weapon: The bright pink ‘Flamingo’ missiles with engines bought from landfill sites that are striking fear into Russia’s generals

Published

on

A Ukrainian long-range 'Flamingo' cruise missile, with its distinctive bright pink tip, sits on its launcher

A cut-price cruise missile containing engines bought from landfill sites is threatening to level the playing field in Ukraine‘s war against Putin‘s forces.

FP-5 Flamingo missiles are allowing Zelensky‘s men to hit targets deep into Russian territory for the first time, as foreign correspondent Chris Pleasance explains in the latest episode of the Daily Mail’s War On Tape.

The projectile’s distinctive name stems from the fact that prototypes were painted bright pink to make them easier to retrieve, while FP is the initials of the manufacturer Fire Point. 

The missile’s power and range are so extensive that many analysts initially refused to believe that they were real. 

Advertisement

 At 45 foot long and with a wingspan of 20 feet, the Flamingo is one of the largest and heaviest cruise missiles ever created.

The projectile weighs six metric tonnes, with a one-tonne warhead, and can fly at speeds of up to 600mph. It is likely its heaviness that gives the missile its signature ‘S’-shaped flight path.

But such power and speed also comes on a budget. Each Flamingo costs around $500,000.

The missile is powered by an Ivcheno AI-25TL engine, originally designed by the Soviets for their training aircraft. Many were scrapped at the end of their service life, so Ukraine bought them from landfill at a cut price. 

Advertisement

A Ukrainian long-range ‘Flamingo’ cruise missile, with its distinctive bright pink tip, sits on its launcher 

Prototypes were painted bright pink to make them easier to retrieve, earning them them their distinctive nickname. Pictured: Two members of a Czech endowment fund for Ukraine look at a Flamingo cruise missile at the Fire Point secret factory at an undisclosed location

Prototypes were painted bright pink to make them easier to retrieve, earning them them their distinctive nickname. Pictured: Two members of a Czech endowment fund for Ukraine look at a Flamingo cruise missile at the Fire Point secret factory at an undisclosed location

Workers inspect a Flamingo cruise missile at Fire Point's secret factory in Ukraine on Monday, August 18, 2025

Workers inspect a Flamingo cruise missile at Fire Point’s secret factory in Ukraine on Monday, August 18, 2025

Advertisement

In comparison, America’s Tomahawk cruise missile is less than half that size, packs less than half the explosive payload, and costs almost four times as much.

The Flamingos are made of carbon fibre strands woven together by machines and so can be assembled quickly. 

Kyiv claims to be currently manufacturing three Flamingos a day, with the aim of increasing that to seven.

Pleasance said: ‘You can begin to see why this missile caused such a stir when it was first unveiled, and why some people refused to believe it was real. 

Advertisement

‘Because the Flamingo fills a large and sophisticated gap in Ukraine’s arsenal: long-range precision strike weapons.’

He added: ‘On a near daily basis, Russia pummels Ukraine with all manner of long-range precision weapons: cruise missiles, ballistic missiles, hypersonic missiles, even experimental missiles like the Oresnik. These are fast-moving, difficult to shoot down.

‘So there’s a whole domain of warfare in which Russia can cause immense damage to Ukraine, but in which Ukraine cannot damage Russia. At least that is until now. 

‘The Flamingo fills this gap in three ways. First, it has a very long range. Second, it has a very large warhead. And third, it is Ukrainian-made.’

Advertisement

The Flamingo has a range of 1,900 miles – significantly beyond America’s ATACMS, Britain’s Storm Shadow or France’s Scalp missiles. 

A graphic detailing the Flamingo missile's technical specifications and the sites of some of the strikes it has been used in

A graphic detailing the Flamingo missile’s technical specifications and the sites of some of the strikes it has been used in

Pleasance said: ‘To say the Flamingo has a long range is perhaps understating things. It isn’t just comparable to the long-range Western weapons that Ukraine has been given in the past, it is significantly better.’ 

He added: ‘It is in an entirely different league, and puts virtually the entire western portion of Russia within striking distance. 

Advertisement

‘That means Ukraine can now hit strategically important factories, oil refineries, and military bases, large numbers of which are based in this region, and of course, both of Russia’s most important cities. Moscow and St. Petersburg.’ 

The Flamingo does not contain GPS or GNSS, or a terrain-scanning system like the Tomahawk, but has achieved remarkable military success during its short lifespan.

Ukraine’s first Flamingo strikes took place in late August 2025 and targeted an outpost in Crimea, around 65 miles behind the front line.

Three missiles were launched, two arrived on target, and one scored a hit, satellite images later revealed.

Advertisement

While the target held little value in and of itself, it proved the Flamingo’s capabilities beyond doubt. 

The next strike came a little over three weeks later, in September 2025, when a Flamingo missile hit a factory in Belgorod, Russia, around 40 miles from the front line, which makes components for Russian fighter jets.

The launch of a Ukrainian long-range FP-5 Flamingo missile, which represents a major advance in the country's strike capabilities

The launch of a Ukrainian long-range FP-5 Flamingo missile, which represents a major advance in the country’s strike capabilities

Four missiles were launched. All four arrived on target, and photos from the scene showed fires inside the factory, suggesting significant damage was caused.

Advertisement

Russia then claimed two further attacks took place in October. It seems one failed when the missiles were shot down, while it is unclear where the other missile landed.

In November, the missiles were used again, this time against the Oryol power plant, more than 100 miles behind the front. 

Four were launched, all four arrived on target, but all of them were shot down during the final phase of the attack, raining fiery debris on the city. 

Further strikes in December and January saw Flamingos fired almost 400 miles behind the front line, one of which struck the firing range that Russia uses for its Oresnik missiles. 

Advertisement

The pattern appears to be that each strike pushes slightly further into Russian territory, testing the Flamingo’s range. 

Two more strikes took place in February, and both scored hits, destroying two significant facilities in the process. 

First, the Kotlaban ammunition storage, a little over 300 miles from the front was blown up, and then the Votkinsk missile factory was also badly damaged. 

The second strike was particularly significant because it occurred more than 800 miles from the front line, much further than Ukraine has been able to strike ever before, even with Western weapons. 

Advertisement

A further strike in March targeted the Chebyevsk ammunition factory, more than 600 miles away. And while two missiles arrived on target, neither of them hit it. 

An explosion from a Ukrainian strike on Orlovskaya Thermal Power Station in Russia's Oryol region in January, a site known to have been hit by Flamingo missiles

An explosion from a Ukrainian strike on Orlovskaya Thermal Power Station in Russia’s Oryol region in January, a site known to have been hit by Flamingo missiles

The last reported strike occurred in May, targeting the Cheboksari factory that makes navigation components for Russian military vehicles. 

Six missiles were launched, and one landed a hit on the factory, but the extent of damage remains unknown.

Advertisement

Pleasance said: ‘Overall, the hype is very real. Flamingos exist and are broadly capable of everything Ukraine said they would be capable of doing. 

‘They have been used in at least eight strikes over the last nine months, of which five caused significant damage. For the first time since the war began, Ukraine now has a long-range precision strike weapon in its arsenal over which it has full control. 

‘Russia can no longer launch missiles into Ukraine with impunity. Kyiv can and will hit back. The tide of this war is slowly but surely beginning to tilt back in Ukraine’s favour.’ 

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Retired female teacher died in freak wooden pole accident – and school district was negligent, family says

Published

on

Paula Budin, a retired elementary school teacher, died in 2024 after she was allegedly struck by a pole while walking

Advertisement

A retired female teacher was enjoying a walk at a local school when she was ‘violently struck’ and killed by a 45-foot pole, her family alleges in a new lawsuit against the district. 

Paula Budin, who was 73 at the time, died on December 5, 2024, after she was struck by a pole while walking at Roxborough High School’s track in Philadelphia, according to a civil complaint obtained by the Daily Mail. 

Her sister, Joyce Siegel, filed a lawsuit in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas last Friday, alleging that Budin’s death was a result of negligence by the School District of Philadelphia and the company hired to inspect the school’s facilities.  

Just after 11am on December 5, 2024, a witness saw Budin lying on the grass unresponsive and called 911. Paramedics rushed to the scene and found the former teacher ‘lying on the ground and bleeding from the back of her head,’ according to the complaint. 

Advertisement

Emergency responders attempted life-saving measures and transported her to Temple University Hospital, but she was pronounced dead about an hour later, complaint continues.  

An autopsy later concluded that Budin’s cause of death was ‘multiple blunt force injuries,’ and it was ruled an accident, according to the lawsuit. 

Siegel’s lawyers allege that the school district removed all of the poles after Budin’s death. 

They wrote in the lawsuit that they inspected the four poles and found that the one that snapped was manufactured in 1997. 

Advertisement

Paula Budin, a retired elementary school teacher, died in 2024 after she was allegedly struck by a pole while walking 

Budin was found at the Roxborough High School track. Her sister has alleged that the pole that struck her was not properly inspected

Budin was found at the Roxborough High School track. Her sister has alleged that the pole that struck her was not properly inspected 

A wrongful death lawsuit alleges that stormwater runoff decayed the pole that allegedly killed Budin

A wrongful death lawsuit alleges that stormwater runoff decayed the pole that allegedly killed Budin 

Advertisement

‘There were no inspection tags anywhere on the subject pole indicated that the pole had never been inspected and therefore not properly maintained by the School District of Philadelphia,’ the lawsuit alleges. 

Siegel’s lawyers argued that the base of the pole was located close to a storm drain and runoff water caused it to deteriorate. They alleged that the pole was ‘almost completely rotted’ where it snapped. 

‘The School District of Philadelphia knew or should have known of the dangerous condition of the subject pole as there were visible signs of its decay as far back as 2014,’ the lawsuit alleges. 

‘Despite this actual and/or constructive knowledge and their appreciation of that risk of catastrophic harm, the district did not take corrective action nor did it warn students or members of the community of the risk of catastrophic harm,’ it continued.

Advertisement

The lawsuit also places blame on Parsons Corporation, which inspected Roxborough High and the track in 2015 and issued a 79-page review two years later. However, Parsons allegedly repeatedly failed to inspect the subject poles.

The lawyers in the lawsuit included images showing how close the pole allegedly was to a drain

The lawyers in the lawsuit included images showing how close the pole allegedly was to a drain 

The lawsuit claims that the School District of Philadelphia 'knew or should have known of the dangerous condition of the subject pole'

The lawsuit claims that the School District of Philadelphia ‘knew or should have known of the dangerous condition of the subject pole’ 

The district and Parsons are both accused of one count of negligence and one count of wrongful death. 

Advertisement

Four ‘John Does’ have also been named in the lawsuit. The attorneys noted that they could not pin down exactly who installed the pole or the drain inlet. 

Budin’s family is seeking compensatory damages and a jury trial. The defendants have yet to respond to the complaint.

The lawsuit describes Budin as someone who ‘enjoyed an active lifestyle.’ Before retirement, she taught elementary schoolers at the Community Partnership School. 

The Daily Mail has reached out to Siegel, the School District of Philadelphia, Parsons and the lawyers involved in the suit for comment. 

Advertisement

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Jason Sudeikis addresses ‘very difficult’ phone calls to former Ted Lasso actors ahead of new season

Published

on

Jason Sudeikis addresses ‘very difficult’ phone calls to former Ted Lasso actors ahead of new season

The upcoming season of Ted Lasso is introducing brand new characters — but the series’ star and co-creator Jason Sudeikis had to say goodbye to the previous cast first.

Apple TV’s hit series was supposed to end with its 2023 finale as Sudeikis’s titular character returned to the U.S. after three seasons as coach of a British men’s soccer team.

Instead, Sudeikis and his fellow co-creators began to brainstorm about continuing the show. Eventually, they landed on a fourth season centering on an all-female team, the cast and creators told The Hollywood Reporter in an article published Wednesday.

However, the new creative direction meant that the fictional AFC Richmond team at the center of the first seasons would not return. Sudeikis, 50, was tasked with explaining that to the actors who played those teammates in “very difficult” individual phone calls, he told THR.

Advertisement

“Because I didn’t want them to hear it on the internet,” the Saturday Night Live alum told the outlet. “And because I love those guys and we all went through something together.”

Jason Sudeikis will return as Ted Lasso for season four of the Apple TV show
Jason Sudeikis will return as Ted Lasso for season four of the Apple TV show (Getty)

Although the old team will not be coming back to the show, lead actors including Sudeikis, Hannah Waddingham, Jeremy Swift, Juno Temple and Brett Goldstein will all be returning for the long-awaited fourth installment.

Currently, there is no update to whether supporting actors Toheeb Jimoh (Sam), Cristo Fernández (Dani), Kola Bokinni (Isaac) and Billy Harris (Colin) will return, although Jimoh joked that he expected his character to have a funeral in the new episodes. Plus, potential guest appearances still remain on the table.

The Independent has reached out to Apple TV for further comment.

Jason Sudeikis and Hannah Waddingham star as a soccer coach and team owner in ‘Ted Lasso’
Jason Sudeikis and Hannah Waddingham star as a soccer coach and team owner in ‘Ted Lasso’ (Apple TV+)

Phil Dunster, who played Jamie Tartt, will also be absent from season four due to scheduling conflicts with his role in Steve Carell’s comedy Rooster, it was announced earlier this year. The actor told podcaster Zach Sang that leaving the show felt like “the end of school when you graduate.”

Apple TV+ logo

Watch Apple TV+ free for 7 day

Advertisement

New subscribers only. £9.99/mo. after free trial. Plan auto-renews until cancelled.

Try for free

ADVERTISEMENT. If you sign up to this service we will earn commission. This revenue helps to fund journalism across The Independent.

Apple TV+ logo

Watch Apple TV+ free for 7 day

New subscribers only. £9.99/mo. after free trial. Plan auto-renews until cancelled.

Advertisement

Try for free

ADVERTISEMENT. If you sign up to this service we will earn commission. This revenue helps to fund journalism across The Independent.

In another shake-up, the series recast the child actor who plays Henry, Sudeikis’s character’s son. Grant Feely will take over the role in the new episodes.

An official logline for season four, out August 5, reads: “Ted returns to Richmond, taking on his biggest challenge yet: coaching a second division women’s football team. Throughout the course of the season, Ted and the team learn to leap before they look, taking chances they never thought they would.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Is Joel dead in EastEnders? Fans ‘rumble’ his attacker – and its not Avani

Published

on

Daily Mirror

EastEnders finished their Wednesday show with a dark cliffhanger, as Joel Marshall was left lying in the road after being attacked by someone on the square, leading some to wonder if he was dead

EastEnders‘ Joel Marshall has been left lying in the middle of the road, and some fans aren’t certain he’ll ever wake up.

During Wednesday’s show, the teen was lured to a party in the park, only for the rest of the teens to tie him up and pour warm beer over his head. They left him tied to a fence, but when they returned, he’d been set free. Cameras then cut to where Joel ended up – unconscious on the floor.

The way Joel was lying had some fans questioning if he was alive or not. “Do you think Joel is dead or do you think he will pull through?” one fan asked online.

Advertisement

In response, some argued that he could be, but that they weren’t sure, saying: “That’s what I’m assuming but cuz it was so dark I could barely see what was on his head”.

Another said that they didn’t want his story, in which he went down to manosphere pipeline, beat up his stepmother Vicki and posted revenge porn of Avani online, to end in his death. One fan said: “If Joel is dead it would be an awful end to a well written story.”

Regardless of whether Joel is dead or alive, someone attacked him. All signs appear to be pointing towards Avani having done it, as she almost attacked Joel last week and has been furious that he was back in Walford. But eagle-eyed fans have suggested it is her friend Amy instead.

Advertisement

“I feel like Amy is up to no good in the Joel assault,” a viewer wrote. “That will create a nice dynamic with Jack while Denise is struggling.”

Another agreed that her behaviour as the ringleader of the revenge plan against Joel had been “bizarre”. A third agreed that “Amy in particular seemed to get so much joy out of” pouring beer on Joel that they “wouldn’t be surprised at all” if she had hit him as well.

Others suggested the attacker could be Barney, who used to have a crush on Avani, especially since his mother has killed someone before. “I reckon they’re double bluffing us and it’s gonna turn out to be Barney,” a fan said. “He’s got his mother’s killer instincts after all.”

Advertisement

A second added: “He is very protective over Avani and they are close friends; so it wouldn’t be too much of a reach that gentle soul Barney makes a rash decision like this – thinking that if Ross & Joel see how hated he is then they will decide to leave and Avani will feel free again.”

While many fans are sure Avani wasn’t involved, they do still think she will come under suspicion: “I’m calling it now Avani and Denzel kissed when they went off for there heart to heart and they are going to want to keep it a secret so everyone will kinda think they did the attack.”

Like this story? For more of the latest showbiz news and gossip, follow Mirror Celebs on TikTok , Snapchat , Instagram , Twitter , Facebook , YouTube and Threads .

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Eve Myles gushes over ‘breathtaking’ co-star in ‘masterpiece’ series

Published

on

Wales Online

The Crow Girl co-stars Eve Myles and Katherine Kelly have been full of praise for each other

Coronation Street’s Katherine Kelly has won praise from co-star Eve Myles for her “extraordinary” turn in The Crow Girl.

Advertisement

The duo appear together in the thriller, which is adapted from Erik Axl Sund’s bestselling Scandinavian novel, with their characters — DCI Jeanette Kilburn (Eve) and psychotherapist Dr Sophia Craven (Katherine) — tracking down a murderer.

The opening series of the gripping drama is showing on Channel 5, while the second series is available on Paramount+, and audiences have been captivated by the “great acting” and “suspenseful” narrative, reports the Daily Star.

The actors have both been full of praise for each other, with Katherine telling Digital Spy that Eve was “astonishing” in the drama. Meanwhile, Eve expressed how “proud” she felt of her colleague, who became a household name playing Becky McDonald in the ITV soap between 2006 and 2012.

“I cannot give you a single scene where Katherine Kelly is not extraordinary,” she said.

Advertisement

“I don’t use that word lightly, but she is extraordinary. Breathtaking. Bold, ambitious, tender, beautiful.”

She went on to describe Katherine as “absolutely a sensation” in The Crow Girl, which also features actor Dougray Scott.

The thriller debuted in 2025, with audiences hailing Jeanette and Sophia’s narrative as “a masterpiece”.

Advertisement

The show’s synopsis states: “When the bodies of unidentified young men start to show up around Bristol, beaten and full of the anaesthetic Lidocaine, police face mounting pressure and little evidence as they hunt the killer.”

“As more bodies surface – including a child missing for over 10 years – the killer edges closer to home, starting a race against time to untangle a web of secrets,” the synopsis continued.

“Dark and gripping, Crow Girl is a murder mystery series that masterfully blends grim themes with sharp, intelligent writing,” one impressed viewer wrote on IMDb. com.

Advertisement

Another fan posted: “It’s been a long time since a show kept me glued to the TV episode after episode. I watched this in one day and I am thoroughly left hanging with bated breath for season two.”

Another reviewer described it as “a challenging watch but very clever”.

The Crow Girl is airing on Channel 5.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Cameron Menziesu urgently treated by medics and out of World Matchplay after scary incident

Published

on

Daily Mirror

Action at the World Matchplay had to be suspended during Cameron Menzies’ clash with Ross Smith as the former was taken off stage to receive medical attention – later withdrawing

Play at the World Matchplay in Blackpool had to be halted after Cameron Menzies was forced to leave the stage to receive medical attention – leading to his withdrawal from the tournament.

He was leading Ross Smith 2-1 but the fourth leg of their contest was put on hold. Before Menzies slumped over he was swaying on the stage, which caught the attention of those around him. He looked as if he was feeling faint before his discomfort became obvious.

Sky Sports presenter Emma Paton said: “We are having a break in our first match because Cameron Menzies is unwell. All we know at the moment is that he is being seen to by St John’s Ambulance. He is with some medics at the moment. Hopefully he is ok and feeling better very shortly.”

Advertisement

Mark Webster added on the incident: “Smith was obviously concerned. He’ll be offering his support. While the medics are seeing to Cameron, he’s got to stay on the practice board. But ultimately it’s just about hoping that Cameron is okay at the minute.”

Smith has ultimately progressed to the quarter-finals as a result of Menzies’ unfortunate illness. After Menzies’ withdrawal the night’s second match – Gian van Veen vs Wessel Nijman – has been bought forward.

There will be more to follow on this breaking news story and Mirror Sport will bring you the very latest updates, pictures and video as soon as possible. Please check back regularly for updates on this developing story. Follow us on Google News, Flipboard, Apple News, X, Facebook or visit The Mirror homepage.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Elon Musk Slated Over AI-Generated Odyssey Film Claim

Published

on

Elon Musk Slated Over AI-Generated Odyssey Film Claim
Elon Musk in January 2026

Tech billionaire Elon Musk’s declaration that his AI company Grok will create its own feature-length adaptation of The Odyssey by the end of the year has been met with widespread derision.

Musk has been among the most vocal critics of Christopher Nolan’s new adaptation of The Odyssey in the lead-up to its release, most notably due to the casting of Lupita Nyong’o as Helen Of Troy and Elliot Page as Sinon.

His hot takes on the film have included branding Nolan an “anti-White racist”, accusing him of “desecrating Homer” and suggesting that the director’s decision to include a diverse cast in his latest film was about winning “awards” after Oscars organisers introduced new measures with regards to movies it nominates (despite the fact that Nolan’s last film Oppenheimer already won Best Picture and Best Director, and Variety’s research indicating that no film nominated for Best Picture in the Oscars’ history would no longer be eligible under the new guidelines).

Forbes has also reported that Musk has boosted posts on the social media site he owns, X, which criticise Nolan, while some of his own messages have included misinformation.

Advertisement
Christopher Nolan

On Wednesday, Musk doubled down on his criticism of The Odyssey, after scenes generated by Grok inspired by the original text were shared on X.

Before this year ends, Grok Imagine will make a full-length movie of The Odyssey that is historically accurate and true to the art of Homer,” he told his followers.

Musk’s comments were pretty quickly picked apart online, with many suggesting that the popularity of The Odyssey since its release last week suggests that audiences wouldn’t exactly be up for watching the whole thing, in inferior AI form…

Others also questioned how “historically accurate” a story featuring gods and monsters could ever really be…

For his part, Nolan has chosen not to address the right-wing critics of his film, but he has previously spoken enthusiastically about Nyong’o’s casting, insisting that she had always been his first pick for the role of Helen Of Troy.

The strength and the poise were so important to the character of Helen,” he previously told Elle. “And Lupita makes it look effortless.

“I’m sure there’s a tremendous amount of discipline and training that goes into projecting that kind of poise and feeling the emotion bubbling beneath the character, the layers of the character right there underneath. She’s just an incredible person to work with, and I was absolutely desperate for her to do the part.”

Advertisement

He has previously voiced his disdain at the idea of AI-generated art, telling The Telegraph: “I’ve never seen a more rapid wholesale dismissal of a supposedly foundational jump in technology in my lifetime. So much energy has been expended on bringing in AI, but if you look at [the younger] generation’s reaction, they’re utterly rejecting it.”

He added: “Their judgment of AI slop has been immediate and harsh. They see it for what it is very quickly – and it’s much easier for them to identify it, because it grew out of an online world they know really well.

“And while that doesn’t mean that every aspect of the technology is useless or meaningless, in film-making it’s hitting at exactly the wrong time. After years of driving towards heavily virtual environments, we’re seeing a renewed interest in more tactile, more real forms of storytelling.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

‘Petrified’ frontline cops call for Old Firm shame game report to be implemented

Published

on

Daily Record

There have been calls for clubs to be docked points or forfeit games if fans invade pitches in future.

The body that represents thousands of Scots cops has expressed ‘deep concerns’ that officers were left “petrified” following fan violence at a Scottish Cup tie earlier this year. The Old Firm, police chiefs and fans have been hammered in an SFA report into the scenes that marred the end of the tie in March between Rangers and Celtic at Ibrox.

Advertisement

The review slammed “life-threatening violence” during a pitch invasion, with officers left “petrified” of policing another game at Ibrox. David Kennedy, General Secretary of the Scottish Police Federation – which represents officers up to the rank of Chief Inspector – said: “It is deeply concerning that experienced police officers have described feeling genuinely scared while carrying out their duties.

“No officer should ever feel that their personal safety is at such risk simply for policing a football match. The review itself highlights the concern that some officers were described as being ‘petrified’ at the prospect of policing another match at Ibrox, and that should concern everyone involved in Scottish football.

“What is important now is that Police Scotland, the Scottish FA and both football clubs work together to learn the lessons from these events and implement the necessary changes. The overwhelming majority of supporters simply want to enjoy the game safely, and everyone involved has a responsibility to ensure that Police officers, stewards, players and fans are never again placed in the position they found themselves in on 8 March.

Advertisement

“The Scottish Police Federation is still in the process of finalising its own health and safety report into the events of that day.” Shameful scenes followed the March match, which Celtic won on penalties.

Members of the Hoops fan group the Green Brigade had forced entry to the ground without tickets. A pitch invasion by the Celtic support prompted a counter-invasion by a section of Rangers fans.

Rival supporters went on to the field, leading to police, stewards and players being assaulted and flares being thrown. The damning report by UEFA security expert Mark Blackbourne for the SFA said: “On the pitch: the confrontation between both sets of supporters, with masked home fans armed with poles and reinforced gloves, came within a very small margin of becoming a violent mass confrontation.

“The four minutes and 28 seconds it a small took to establish of control was a period in which violent serious, potentially life-threatening violence was possible.”

Advertisement

The report went on: “The jeopardy of extra time and penalties, the scale of the away allocation and the historical resonance of the occasion combined to produce a risk profile. Neither Rangers FC nor Police Scotland had key leads on the ground with experience of managing an away allocation of 8000 Celtic supporters at Ibrox.”

Police Scotland have to date made 37 arrests in connection with the disorder. Blackbourne said it was a post-match Glasgow City Council Safety Advisory Group meeting which recorded that time-served cops were “petrified” of policing another match at Ibrox.

He added: “That word must be read in context, not in isolation, but so qualified, it remains deeply disturbing for Scottish football. This reference demands the most serious attention from all parties with responsibility for the governance of safety and security at major football fixtures in Scotland.”

Advertisement

Blackbourne’s report also outlines how a 10-year-old and nine-year-old were injured by coins thrown by fans and a Rangers player was racially abused. Former player and SFA Chief Executive Gordon Smith says fans should be warned that their clubs could be docked points or have to forfeit games if they invade pitches in large numbers.

He added: “I think the fans should be told that invasion of the pitch would change the result of the match. In a league game they lose points, if is a cup game they are put out the cup even though they might win.

“I do think that would change the behaviour. They then know by doing that they are actually going against their team, their own club.

“They are actually doing a negative thing therefore that might be a way of controlling them and stopping them doing things like that if they know their club are going to suffer as a result. Any pitch invasion at all for me deserves that punishment.”

Advertisement

Smith also said it was a mistake by the SFA to allow so many away fans at the March cup game. He doesn’t want fans banned from Old Firm games but would prefer a reduced number being allowed into the away end for cup games as they are in league games.

Smith added: “It was a mistake to allow that. There had been a reduction in number of fans at Old Firm league games in terms of the away fans.

“I think that has been the right decision to reduce it. So there is less chance of a problem there.”

Advertisement

Smith continued: “We need to get to the same figures as the league are doing and the SFA have to change that for any cup matches in the future. It takes away totally from the game if there is no rival fans there.

“I am not in favour of away fans not being there. I am in favour of reduced numbers so that it is easier to control for the police.”

Chief Superintendent Rhona Fraser, vice president of The Association of Scottish Police Superintendents said: “We welcome the Blackbourne Report and the recommendations that place the collective responsibility for safety squarely on the shoulders of the fans and football clubs, supported by the authorities.

“Whilst sanctions against clubs should be a last resort, they must be swiftly implemented and sufficiently powerful to punish those offenders who bring shame on the national game. First and foremost, this is an issue for football, not the police or prosecutors.”

Police Scotland Assistant Chief Constable Alan Waddell said: “We will continue to engage with the clubs and football authorities on the recommendations contained in the report.”

Advertisement

Get more Daily Record exclusives by signing up for free to Google’s preferred sources. Click HERE

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025