St John’s College, part of the University of Cambridge, said the rooms will be used by a number of colleges
Cambridge City Council has approved plans to replace a student accommodation block with one with around 300 more rooms. St John’s College applied to knock down the aging Wolfson Court building off Clarkson Road with a total of 147 rooms. The plans were recommended for approval by officers.
The University of Cambridge college said the new building will have 408 rooms which will also be used by students from nearby Newnham College, Lucy Cavendish College, and the Sir Isaac Newton Institute of Mathematics.
21 objections were submitted by Newnham residents concerned with the size of the scheme. Jackie Meeks told the council’s planning committee: “We do support getting Wolfson Court back into college use – it shouldn’t be left decaying as it has been – but this isn’t the right way to do it.
“A more modest scale of building would be appropriate to this residential area. Basic refitting of the existing buildings would be appropriate for the planet. Now the applicant seeks to open accommodation to all of Cambridge University and Anglia Ruskin and any of their associate or affiliated entities.” She said that the application “has morphed into a monster” and managing the block “looks virtually unworkable”.
An agent for the applicant told the committee that many of the students would be postgraduates, with their rooms being occupied year-round. He said rooms for undergraduates would be used by conference delegates and those attending educational courses, and “will not be utilised by tourists or as an aparthotel”.
Councillor Hugh Clough, of Newnham, said St John’s had made their case on the basis that the rooms would only be used by three colleges – but “without explanation” are now seeking for it to be used by academic staff, visitors and students from Anglia Ruskin University.
The Green councillor said: “The extent of occupancy must be compatible with this sensitive location. The institutions requested should certainly not include ARU – that institution is too remote from the site.”
He said the application was initially “exclusively for postgraduate students” but “once again, the applicant has altered the target and now there are contradictory statements”.
Cllr Peter Rees, county councillor for Newnham, said it was discovered that there are student accommodation facilities “housing non-students for more than 50 per cent of the time”. The Green councillor said: “So, are they really student accommodation?
“If it was, as initially intended, to be restricted to postgraduate students on a 12-month lease, this would be far more welcome among residents. I’m afraid I have to conclude that this is greenwashing. There is an alternative approach which would not use this large-scale demolish and rebuild – which is to reuse and refurbish.”
Cllr Kathryn Fisher, of Petersfield, asked what materials the building was used. Officers replied that the frame would be reinforced concrete.
The Green councillor said: “I’m honestly very shocked that’s been passed – that is so bad.”
Cllr Dave Baigent, of Romsey, asked if they would be able to reject the application to “encourage” the applicant to use better materials – but officers said there was no policy reason to reject it.
The Your Party councillor said: “How can we encourage people to use better materials to protect against global warming without actually rejecting something and sending it back?” Officers said that the council’s local plan could only encourage the use of more sustainable materials – not enforce it.
Cllr Fisher said: “I don’t understand what’s the point of having this policy – like, why do we bother? Why are we here? We’ve got wildfires burning across Europe, we’re running out of water. We are in the midst of climate collapse and we’ve got a climate policy that we can’t even speak to to hold one of the largest developers to account. It’s crazy. It’s insane.”
The application was approved with three votes in favour and two against.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login