Connect with us

Crypto World

Relative Strength Index (RSI): Trading Strategies, Settings, and Market Applications

Published

on

Relative Strength Index (RSI): Trading Strategies, Settings, and Market Applications

RSI is a popular momentum indicator in technical trading across forex, stock, and cryptocurrency* markets. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) is a momentum oscillator developed by J. Welles Wilder that measures the speed of price movements on a 0–100 scale. Traders use it to detect overbought/oversold conditions, trend strength, pullbacks, and exhaustion.

Although often viewed as a basic oscillator, the RSI plays a more nuanced role in professional trading strategies, particularly when combined with trend and volatility indicators. Understanding how the RSI behaves in different market environments may help traders refine entries, implement risk management strategies, and confirm trade setups.

In this article, we will consider how the RSI indicator works, how it is calculated, and how it can be applied in practical trading strategies across multiple asset classes.

Takeaways

  • The Relative Strength Index (RSI) is a momentum indicator that measures the speed and magnitude of recent price movements to evaluate whether an asset is overbought or oversold.
  • Developed by J. Welles Wilder, the RSI is plotted on a scale from 0 to 100 and is most commonly calculated over a 14-period timeframe.
  • At its core, the RSI compares the average size of recent gains with the average size of recent losses over a defined period.
  • Traditionally, RSI trading rules suggest that readings above 70 indicate overbought conditions, while readings below 30 signal oversold levels.
  • Besides overbought and oversold signals, the indicator can provide divergence, trend strength, and failure swings signals.

What Is the Relative Strength Index?

The Relative Strength Index (RSI) is a momentum oscillator in modern technical analysis. Developed by J. Welles Wilder Jr. and introduced in 1978 in New Concepts in Technical Trading Systems, the indicator measures the speed and magnitude of recent price movements in order to evaluate underlying market momentum.

The RSI is plotted on a scale from 0 to 100 and is classified as an oscillator because it fluctuates within a fixed range rather than following price directly. This structure allows traders to evaluate whether buying or selling pressure is strengthening or weakening relative to recent market activity.

Advertisement

In practice the RSI functions less as a reversal indicator and more as a momentum persistence gauge. In directional markets the oscillator spends extended time in one half of its range, reflecting order-flow imbalance rather than exhaustion. Professional traders therefore interpret extreme readings as trend participation signals unless market structure begins to break.

Although the RSI is often introduced as a simple overbought-oversold tool, its practical application in professional trading is considerably broader. In leveraged markets such as forex and CFDs, traders use the indicator to identify pullbacks within trends, detect momentum divergence, and refine entry timing across multiple timeframes. The RSI therefore functions less as a standalone signal generator and more as a contextual momentum filter within broader trading systems.

The RSI belongs to the family of bounded momentum oscillators introduced by J. Welles Wilder in New Concepts in Technical Trading Systems (1978), alongside the average true range (ATR), the average directional movement index (ADX), and the parabolic stop and reverse (Parabolic SAR).

RSI Formula and Calculation

How is RSI calculated? It’s quite difficult to calculate the RSI. Fortunately, you don’t need to do it manually, as it’s one of the standard indicators implemented in most trading platforms. For instance, you can use TickTrader to examine the RSI without making complicated calculations.

However, it’s worth understanding how the indicator is measured to know which metrics can affect its performance.

Advertisement

The RSI Formula Explained

RSI formula

The calculation involves three main steps. First, the average gain and average loss over the selected period are determined. Second, these values are used to calculate relative strength, defined as the ratio of average gains to average losses. Finally, this ratio is transformed into an index value between 0 and 100 using the RSI formula.

The most popular RSI period is 14, meaning its values are based on closing prices for the latest 14 periods, regardless of the timeframe. We will use this period as an example of RSI calculations.

The standard RSI formula description:

Step 1: Average Gain and Average Loss

To calculate average gains and losses, you need to calculate the price change from the previous period.

Advertisement

Note: If the current price is higher than the previous one, add the gain to a total gain variable. If the price declined from the previous period, add the figure to a total loss variable.

After you calculate the change for all 14 periods, you need to add up the gains and divide them by 14 and sum up the losses and divide the total by 14.

Step 2: Calculate the Relative Strength (RS)

RS = Average Gain / Average Loss

To calculate the relative strength, divide the average gain by the average loss.

Advertisement

Step 3: Calculate the RSI

Now that you calculated the RS, you can proceed with the RSI value. For this, you need to add 1 to RS, divide 100 by the sum, and subtract the result from 100.

Relative Strength Index = 100 – 100 / (1 + RS)

Because the calculation uses smoothed averages of gains and losses, the RSI reacts to volatility contraction faster than to volatility expansion. This asymmetry explains why the indicator often gives early signals near market tops but delayed signals near lows.

What RSI Setting Do Traders Use?

The standard period is 14. Shorter lookback periods produce a more sensitive indicator that reacts quickly to price changes but generates more noise. Longer periods smooth out fluctuations but may lag behind rapid market shifts. This trade-off explains why RSI settings are often adjusted according to strategy type, whether scalping, day trading, or swing trading.

Advertisement

The following adjustments are common depending on strategy and timeframe:

Trading style

Typical RSI period

Advertisement

Scalping

5–9

Intraday trading

9–14

Advertisement

Swing trading

14

Position trading

21

Advertisement

Scalping strategies often use shorter RSI periods to capture rapid momentum shifts on lower timeframes. While this increases signal frequency, it also requires stricter risk management due to higher noise levels.

Want to learn how to read the RSI indicator signals?

How Is the RSI Indicator Used in Trading?

How to interpret the RSI indicator? There are four common ways to use the RSI indicator when trading: spot overbought and oversold conditions, find price divergences, implement failure swings for reversal signals, and determine market trends.

Advertisement

Relative Strength Index: Overbought/Oversold Indicator

The traditional interpretation of RSI levels focuses on the 70 and 30 thresholds. Readings above 70 are commonly described as overbought, while readings below 30 are considered oversold. However, in professional trading environments these thresholds are treated as reference zones rather than absolute signals.

The 70/30 framework works primarily in rotational markets. During macro-driven trends, price commonly continues moving after entering overbought or oversold territory because positioning flows dominate short-term mean reversion. In these conditions the RSI defines pullback zones rather than reversal zones.

During sustained uptrends, the RSI typically fluctuates between 40 and 80 (sometimes reaching 90 in very strong trends). Pullbacks often hold above 40, showing that bullish momentum remains intact. In sustained downtrends, the RSI usually ranges between 20 and 60, with rallies failing near 60, reflecting persistent selling pressure. These shifting RSI ranges may help traders assess trend strength rather than relying solely on the traditional 70/30 overbought–oversold levels.

Sustained RSI range shifts usually reflect systematic positioning rather than retail momentum. When the oscillator establishes a higher equilibrium range, dips towards the mid-zone often coincide with passive liquidity absorption rather than trend rejection.

Advertisement

On the daily chart of the GBP/USD pair, the RSI entered the oversold area on 22nd April, left it for a while on 4th May, but returned to it and continued moving upwards only on 15th May.

An example of the oversold RSI

Additionally, when using overbought/oversold signals, traders keep in mind that they can reflect an upcoming correction, not a trend reversal. The GBP/USD pair was trading in a strong downtrend, and the RSI provided a signal of a short-term correction only.

To distinguish between corrections and reversals, traders combine the RSI with other tools. A cross of a moving average can confirm a change in the trend.

Oversold RSI strategy

On the chart above, the RSI broke above the 30 level on 28th September. A trader could go long, using a trailing take profit. After the MA/EMA cross occurred (1), a trader could trail the take-profit target. Another option would be to place the take-profit order at the closest resistance level (2) and wait for the cross to confirm the reversal signal. After the confirmation, a trader could open another buy position and drive the uptrend.

Advertisement

RSI Divergence Strategy

RSI is a divergence indicator. Another option for using the RSI is to look for divergences between the indicator and the price chart. Divergence occurs when price action and indicator momentum move in opposite directions, signalling a potential shift in underlying market dynamics.

A convention widely used in exchange educational materials is:

  • An RSI bullish divergence forms when price records a lower low while the RSI prints a higher low. This pattern indicates that selling pressure is weakening even as price continues to decline.
  • An RSI bearish divergence, by contrast, appears when price reaches a higher high but the RSI forms a lower high, suggesting diminishing upward momentum.

Divergence is more popular when it occurs near key support or resistance levels. However, because divergence can persist for extended periods before price reverses, it is rarely traded in isolation. Many traders confirm RSI divergence using tools such as the MACD or structural breaks in market structure.

Hidden divergence is another variation that signals trend continuation rather than reversal. In trending markets, this form of divergence may help traders identify pullbacks that are likely to resolve in the direction of the prevailing trend.

  • A bullish divergence forms when the price rises with higher lows, but the relative strength index declines with lower lows, traders expect the price to move upwards.
  • A bearish divergence forms when the price falls with lower highs, but the relative strength index moves upwards with higher highs, traders believe the price will decline.

Regular and hidden RSI divergence

Divergence frequently precedes momentum slowdown instead of immediate reversal. Markets often transition into consolidation before changing direction, which is why many traders wait for structure breaks rather than trading the first divergence signal. For example,  in liquid index markets the first divergence often leads to range formation before trend change.

Advertisement

In the RSI example chart below, the indicator and the price formed a regular bearish divergence. As a result, the price fell (1). There was another divergence before the fall, but the price decline was short-lived (2). This highlights risks associated with the incorrect signals the RSI divergence may provide.

An example of the RSI divergence

RSI Failure Swings: A Reversal Signal

Another signal that traders can consider is failure swings of the RSI which occur before a strong trend reversal. Although it is less common than the others, traders can add it to their list of tools.

The theory suggests traders don’t consider price actions but look at the indicator alone.

  • Bullish reversal. A trend may turn bullish when the RSI breaks below 30, leaves the oversold area, falls to 30 but doesn’t cross it and rebounds, continuing to rise.
  • Bearish reversal. A trend may reverse down when the RSI enters the overbought area, crosses below 70, and returns to 70 but bounces and continues falling.

An example of RSI failure swings

Failure swings lose significance during volatility expansion events such as economic releases, when directional movement is driven by repricing rather than momentum decay.

Advertisement

In the chart above, the RSI trading indicator broke below 30, left the oversold area, and retested the 30 level (1). At the same time, the price formed the bottom, and the downtrend reversed upwards (2).

Failure swings are more common on short-term timeframes and do not always reflect a trend reversal. Therefore, traders combine the RSI with trend and volume indicators.

The RSI can be used to identify a trend direction. Constance Brown, the author of multiple books about trading, noticed in her book Technical Analysis for the Trading Professional that the RSI indicator doesn’t fluctuate between 0 and 100. In a bullish trend, it moves in the 40-90 range. In a bearish trend, it fluctuates between 10 and 60.

To identify the trend, traders consider support and resistance levels. In an uptrend, the 40-50 zone serves as support. In a downtrend, the 50-60 range acts as resistance.

Advertisement

An example of trend determination using the RSI

In the chart above, the RSI stayed above 40 as the price was moving in a solid uptrend. Once it broke below the 40-50 support level (1), the trend changed (2).

However, there may be incorrect signals. In the chart below, the RSI broke below the support level twice, but the trend didn’t change.

An example of unsuccessful trend detection using RSI

Ranges may vary depending on the trend strength, price volatility, and the period of the RSI.

RSI and Simple Moving Average

Usually, the RSI indicator consists of a single line. However, there are variations of the indicator. It can be combined with the simple moving average. The moving average usually has the same period as the RSI.

Advertisement

The rule is that when the RSI breaks below the SMA, the price is supposed to fall (1). When the RSI rises above the SMA, the price is expected to increase (2).

RSI and Simple Moving Average

However, there are some aspects to consider. Firstly, traders avoid using RSI/SMA cross signals in the ranging market as the lines move close to each other and cross all the time, providing many fake signals. Secondly, a cross doesn’t determine the period of a rise or a fall. Traders use additional tools to identify where the price may turn around.

Note: The RSI is sensitive to volatility clustering. During news-driven sessions the indicator’s thresholds lose value because price movement is distribution-driven rather than momentum-driven.

RSI Trading Strategies Used by Professional Traders

Professional use of the RSI typically involves integrating the indicator into structured trading frameworks rather than relying on single signals. Several widely used approaches illustrate how momentum analysis can support decision-making.

Advertisement

What Is the 70-30 RSI Trading Strategy?

70-30 RSI Trading Strategy

The 70-30 RSI strategy simply uses the overbought and oversold RSI readings to identify potential turning points. However, instead of simply going short above 70 (overbought RSI) and long below 30 (oversold RSI), traders typically apply a few levels of refinement.

Entry:

  • Traders determine if the trend is bullish or bearish.
  • They apply a trend filter. The RSI can produce false signals in a strong trend, showing overbought for a long time in a bullish trend and vice versa. They often use the 70-30 strategy to look for shorts when the price rallies in a downtrend and longs when the price dips in an uptrend.
  • They enter the market when the RSI crosses back into the normal range. For instance, they’ll open a short trade when the RSI falls back below 70, indicating that a potential bearish reversal may be underway.

Stop Loss:

  • Stop losses are often set beyond a nearby swing point.

Take Profit:

  • Profits might be taken at an area of support or resistance when the RSI hits the opposite extreme (e.g. 70 when long), or when other indicators signal a price reversal.

Mean-reversion RSI strategies statistically depend on market volatility compression. As volatility expands, breakout continuation tends to dominate over oscillator reversal signals.

50-60 and 40-50 Trading Strategies

50-60 RSI Trading Strategy

What is the 50-60 RSI trading strategy? The 50-60 RSI strategy works on the idea that the market shows bullish momentum above 50, with 60 acting as a resistance level. When the price breaks through 60, it can signal that bullishness is strong, offering a potential entry point.

Note:

Advertisement
  • Despite the name, the same logic can be applied in a bearish trend, where 40 acts as a support level.
  • This strategy is popular in markets with a strong trend. Indices, such as the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100, or commodities like gold, that exhibit strong trends are often chosen by traders.

Entry:

  • Traders may enter the market when the price crosses above 60 for the first time.
  • Alternatively, they might wait for a pullback to 60 before going long.

Stop Loss:

  • A stop loss may be set beyond the nearest major swing point or just beyond the entry candle on a pullback.
  • Alternatively, some traders manually stop out if the price crosses below 50.

Take Profit:

  • Profits might be taken when the price crosses below 50, giving room for the trade to run in a strong trend. However, this may limit potential returns when trading on short-term timeframes. Therefore, some traders prefer the closest resistance levels.

Typical RSI Strategy Comparison

Strategy type

Market condition

RSI role

Timeframe

Advertisement

Reversal

Range-bound

Overbought/oversold entries

M5–H1

Advertisement

Trend pullback

Trending market

Entry timing

M15–H4

Advertisement

Divergence

Reversal zones

Momentum confirmation

H1–D1

Advertisement

Scalping

High liquidity sessions

Short-term signals

M1–M15

Advertisement

RSI Meaning in Trading: Forex, Stocks, and Crypto* Markets

The RSI is applied across asset classes, but it behaves differently because persistence characteristics vary. Equity indices exhibit autocorrelation, currencies exhibit mean reversion around macro levels, and digital assets display momentum clustering. RSI interpretation should therefore be adjusted to the instrument’s structural behaviour rather than fixed thresholds.

In forex trading, where macroeconomic factors often drive sustained directional moves, the RSI is commonly used to identify pullbacks within trends rather than outright reversals. Currency pairs can remain overbought or oversold for extended periods when central bank policy or macro data supports a strong directional bias.

What is the RSI indicator in the stock market? In the stock markets, the indicator is frequently applied to mean-reversion strategies around key support and resistance levels. Stocks tend to exhibit more frequent range-bound behaviour than major currency pairs, making traditional overbought-oversold interpretations somewhat more applicable.

Advertisement

Cryptocurrency* markets, characterised by high volatility and rapid sentiment shifts, often produce extreme RSI readings. In this environment, divergence analysis becomes particularly valuable, as momentum frequently weakens before price reverses.

How to Use the Relative Strength Index with Other Indicators

In professional trading systems, the RSI is rarely used in isolation. Combining momentum analysis with trend, volatility, and volume tools may help traders filter signals and false entries.

RSI with MACD

RSI and MACD (moving average convergence divergence) are oscillators. However, they measure momentum differently, which allows one to confirm the signals of another. Usually, traders look for RSI overbought/oversold signals and MACD divergence. For instance, when the RSI is in the oversold zone but the MACD has a bullish divergence with the price chart, traders consider this a confirmation of a coming price rise. Read our article RSI vs. MACD.

RSI with Moving Averages

Early signals are one of the limitations of the RSI indicator. Therefore, traders often combine them with lagging technical analysis tools. An exponential moving average (EMA) is one of the options. Traders add two EMAs with different periods to the chart and wait for a cross to confirm the trend reversal signal the RSI provided.

Advertisement

RSI with Bollinger Bands

Bollinger bands are used similarly to the RSI, showing when the market is possibly overbought or oversold. Used together, these two indicators can provide confluence; for example, if the RSI indicates overbought and the price has closed through the upper band, then there may be an increased likelihood of a bearish reversal, and vice versa.

RSI with On-Balance Volume (OBV)

The on-balance volume (OBV) is a tool that tracks volume to confirm trends. Paired with the RSI, it has two uses. The first is that it can indicate trend strength. If the RSI is falling alongside the OBV, the bearish trend is likely genuine and vice versa. The second is confirming divergences. The OBV can diverge from the price like the RSI, so if both diverge, a reversal may be inbound.

Using RSI on Trading Platforms

Most trading platforms include the RSI as a standard built-in indicator. Platforms such as MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 allow traders to adjust periods, apply smoothing, and set custom alert levels. Also, you can implement the RSI indicator into your trading strategy on TradingView and TickTrader platforms, which also allow you to set up the indicator for your unique trading style.

Professional traders often integrate RSI signals into multi-timeframe analysis. For instance, a higher-timeframe RSI reading may define directional bias, while a lower-timeframe signal provides entry timing. This approach reduces the likelihood of trading against broader market momentum.

Advertisement

Pros and Cons of the RSI Indicator

Although the relative strength index is one of the most popular indicators, it has limitations. Let’s explore the two sides of the coin.

Benefits of the RSI in Trading

The relative strength index is a useful tool because of:

  • Numerous signals. The RSI provides different signals so traders with different trading approaches can add it to their tool list.
  • Numerous assets and timeframes. One of its advantages is that you can use the RSI on any timeframe of any asset. What does the RSI stand for in stocks? The same thing that it stands for in forex, commodity, and cryptocurrency* markets.
  • Simplicity. Despite the wide range of signals, it’s easy to remember them. If you are familiar with other oscillators such as the stochastic oscillator, you will quickly learn how to use the RSI indicator.
  • Standard settings. Although you can change the period of the RSI, its standard period of 14 is used in many trading strategies.
  • Working signals. The RSI is one of the most popular trading tools. However, the reliability of its signals depends on trader skills and market conditions.

Limitations and False Signals of RSI

Although the RSI is a functional tool, there are some pitfalls traders should consider.

  • Weak at trend reversals. The indicator may provide early signals when spotting trend reversal.
  • False signals. The relative strength index isn’t a very popular tool in ranging markets.
  • Lagging indicator. The RSI is based on past price data, meaning it may be relatively slow to react to sudden movements.
  • Overbought/oversold conditions can persist. In strong trends, prices may remain above 70 or below 30 for long periods, leading to premature entries and exits.

Note: The RSI does not determine price direction; it measures the condition of the current move. Its primary value lies in distinguishing continuation conditions from exhaustion conditions.

Final Thoughts

The Relative Strength Index continues to play a central role in technical trading across forex, equities, and cryptocurrency* markets. Its value lies not in reflecting reversals in isolation but in providing insight into the strength and sustainability of price movements. When used alongside trend analysis, volatility measures, and volume indicators, the RSI becomes a powerful component of structured trading strategies.

For traders operating in leveraged CFD and forex markets, proper application involves combining the indicator with broader analytical tools, adapting settings to the trading timeframe, and maintaining disciplined risk management.

Advertisement

You can consider opening an FXOpen account today to build your own trading strategy in over 700 instruments with tight spreads from 0.0 pips and low commissions from $1.50 (additional fees may apply).

FAQ

What Does the RSI Stand For?

RSI stands for relative strength index. It’s a momentum-based indicator that measures the speed and magnitude of price movements.

What Is the RSI Setting?

The only setting of the Relative Strength Index is the period, which reflects the number of past candles used to calculate average gains and losses, affecting how sensitive the RSI is to price changes. The default period is 14, though shorter or longer settings may be applied depending on trading style and timeframe.

How Traders Use the RSI Indicator

The RSI moves between 0 and 100, with >70 meaning the asset is overbought and <30 meaning oversold. It can be used to spot potential market reversals and confirm trend strength.

Advertisement

Is RSI Used in Forex Trading?

Yes. The RSI is widely used in forex to identify pullbacks, confirm trends, and detect divergence signals.

How Do Traders Use RSI Divergence?

Divergence between price and RSI is often used to identify weakening momentum and potential reversals, particularly when confirmed by other indicators or price-structure analysis.

What Is the RSI in Stocks?

The RSI meaning in stocks refers to the same RSI indicator used in other asset classes. It’s used to gauge buying and selling pressure.

Is High RSI Bullish or Bearish?

A high RSI (above 70) signals bullish momentum, suggesting an overbought market and a potential soon downward reversal.

Advertisement

*Important: At FXOpen UK, Cryptocurrency trading via CFDs is only available to our Professional clients. They are not available for trading by Retail clients. To find out more information about how this may affect you, please get in touch with our team.

This article represents the opinion of the Companies operating under the FXOpen brand only. It is not to be construed as an offer, solicitation, or recommendation with respect to products and services provided by the Companies operating under the FXOpen brand, nor is it to be considered financial advice.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Crypto World

The quantum threat is already here

Published

on

David Carvalho

Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed here belong solely to the author and do not represent the views and opinions of crypto.news’ editorial.

Quantum computing is often framed as a distant storm on the horizon, and not yet relevant to today’s cryptographic systems. In 2026, that framing is dangerously misguided. The Ethereum Foundation’s recent decision to launch a dedicated Post-Quantum (PQ) cryptography team, backed by $2 million in funding, is a watershed moment for the industry. The world’s most influential smart contract ecosystem is no longer treating quantum risk as theoretical; it is acting on the correct assumption that cryptographic disruption could arrive far sooner than expected. 

Advertisement

Summary

  • Quantum risk is no longer theoretical: The Ethereum Foundation’s post-quantum team signals that cryptographic disruption is being treated as an imminent infrastructure threat, not a distant possibility.
  • Harvest-now, decrypt-later is the real danger: Millions of exposed public keys could be drained overnight once quantum capability crosses the threshold — no gradual warning, just systemic shock.
  • Migration won’t be seamless: Upgrading trillion-dollar blockchains to post-quantum cryptography could require massive downtime, creating ripple effects across ETFs, custody, banking, and global markets.

The quantum threat is already a present market risk, not a future technical problem, and crypto’s failure to treat it as such will define the next systemic crisis. Some readers may find this view overly alarmist or argue that highlighting quantum risk could undermine confidence in digital assets. Others may object that this perspective challenges long-held assumptions about Bitcoin’s resilience and the pace of technological change. However, these contentions radically underestimate how close we are to a cryptographic collapse.

From theory to strategic priority

It’s important to note that quantum computing is no longer confined to academic research. Nation-states, defense agencies, and major technology companies are racing to build machines capable of solving problems classical computers can’t. The risk is not merely computational speed but the potential collapse of cryptographic trust itself.

Advertisement

This urgency is now reflected in some landmark policy developments. The European Commission and EU Member States recently released a coordinated roadmap to transition the bloc’s digital infrastructure to post-quantum cryptography. It stipulates that by 2026, all Member States must begin national PQC strategies; by 2030, critical infrastructure must adopt quantum-resistant encryption; and by 2035, the transition should be completed across all feasible systems. 

The Ethereum Foundation’s decision to allocate funding and talent toward post-quantum research mirrors this new reality.

The dangerous comfort of long timelines

Despite these developments, some industry voices continue to downplay the risk. Bitcoin (BTC) pioneer Adam Back has argued that Bitcoin faces no meaningful quantum threat for 20 to 40 years. This position rests on the assumption that danger only begins when a quantum computer can break cryptographic keys in real time.

The threat does not start when quantum machines arrive at full strength; it starts when attackers can harvest public keys today and wait. Deloitte recently reported that roughly four million Bitcoin, around 25% of all usable supply, sit in addresses that expose public keys vulnerable to quantum attacks. Once a sufficiently advanced quantum computer exists, those wallets could be drained almost instantly using Shor’s algorithm. 

Advertisement

The damage would not unfold gradually. It would be sudden, asymmetric, and irreversible.

Why upgrading is not a simple fix

Supporters of the long-horizon view argue that Bitcoin and other blockchains can simply adopt the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s post-quantum cryptography standards when the time comes. But cryptographic migration is a protocol-level transformation, not a routine patch.

Researchers estimate that upgrading Bitcoin to a quantum-resistant cryptosystem could require up to 75 days of downtime, or over 300 days if the network must operate at reduced capacity to limit attack vectors during migration. For a trillion-dollar asset class, such a disruption would ripple through exchanges, derivatives markets, ETFs, institutional custody systems, and payment rails. This is a risk the market is not currently pricing in.

Blockchains are not alone in this exposure, as the global banking and payments infrastructure relies on the same cryptographic standards now considered vulnerable. A quantum breach would compromise not just assets, but identity systems, digital signatures, interbank settlements, and automated clearing mechanisms.

Advertisement

In practical terms, this could mean frozen payment rails, invalidated digital contracts, and emergency shutdowns of financial networks. The shock would move beyond crypto into equity markets, foreign exchange, and sovereign debt, creating a systemic crisis rooted in broken trust.

When AI and quantum outpace governance

This risk is amplified by the ongoing proliferation of AI, which is accelerating discovery, automation, and exploitation. When paired with quantum computing, it creates a scenario in which machine-scale attacks outpace human governance and regulatory response. Laws move in years. Algorithms move in milliseconds, and the gap is widening continuously. Decentralized systems were designed to remove single points of failure, yet cryptographic fragility threatens to reintroduce them at the foundation layer.

If cryptographic assumptions change, valuations will follow, and capital will increasingly favor quantum-resilient infrastructure. Risk premiums on legacy chains will widen, and regulators will increasingly demand transparency around cryptographic readiness, and institutional investors will expect quantum-risk disclosures. The Ethereum Foundation’s decision is an early signal that the markets will not ignore for long.

Advertisement

David Carvalho

David Carvalho

David Carvalho is the founder, CEO, and Chief Scientist of Naoris Protocol, the world’s first decentralized security solution powered by a post-quantum blockchain and distributed AI, backed by Tim Draper and the Former Chief of Intelligence of NATO. With over 20 years of experience as a Global Chief Information Security Officer and ethical hacker, David has worked at both technical and C-suite levels in multi-billion-dollar organizations across Europe and the UK. He is a trusted advisor to nation-states and critical infrastructures under NATO, focusing on cyber-war, cyber-terrorism, and cyber-espionage. A blockchain pioneer since 2013, David has contributed to innovations in PoS/PoW mining and next-gen cybersecurity. His work emphasizes risk mitigation, ethical wealth creation, and value-driven advancements in crypto, automation, and Distributed AI.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

How STON.fi’s Omniston Scaled DeFi on TON

Published

on

How STON.fi's Omniston Scaled DeFi on TON

Building a swap DApp is relatively straightforward. Running it under real market conditions — with bots, arbitrageurs, and volatile liquidity — is not. BeInCrypto sat down with Andrey Fedorov, CMO & CBDO at STON.fi Dev at Consensus Hong Kong to hear what that process actually looked like.

STON.fi launched as an AMM (automated market maker) on TON Blockchain — a swap interface with liquidity pools. Omniston, its liquidity aggregation protocol, came later as a response to fragmentation: multiple DEXs on TON meant users had to manually compare prices across protocols. Omniston was supposed to fix that by aggregating liquidity into a single access point.

Aggregation worked. But scale exposed new constraints.

Three Lessons From Production

Fedorov is candid about what went wrong early on. “First there was just one token, and it was very easy to provide the technology. Activity levels were minimal, and the user base was still small. But over time it exploded.”

Advertisement

The first lesson was scaling. Both the front end and back end buckled under unexpected demand. The second was subtler: multi-hop swaps — routing trades through intermediate tokens — worked in testing but revealed edge cases under live conditions. “In theory, both hops execute seamlessly,” Fedorov explains. “In practice, you have simultaneous transactions, liquidity shifting across pools, and multiple DEXs updating state at once. The first hop can succeed while the second fails.”

The third lesson was about complexity itself. The initial model assumed a simple set of actors: users swap, liquidity providers provide. Reality added arbitrageurs, bots, and more complex interaction patterns that hadn’t yet been fully anticipated. “I don’t think it is actually possible to work out all these things in the beginning. You need to launch it, see how it goes, then fix something if it breaks.”

STON.fi now accounts for 80 to 90 percent of DEX activity on TON, underscoring its dominant share of swap volume on the chain. But cross-chain swaps, next on the roadmap, will reset that counter. “The fundamentals will be the same, but I’m sure we will see new challenges.”

Andrey Fedorov at Consensus HK

Why Aggregation Wasn’t Enough

Omniston’s original proposition was to connect all TON DEX pools and find the best route. But aggregating public liquidity has a ceiling. If nobody has added liquidity to a particular pair, no amount of smart routing helps.

“Sometimes people just don’t want to provide liquidity in a specific pool,” Fedorov says. “When a user wants to swap a token in this pool, they can’t get a good price because there is no liquidity.”

Advertisement

The answer was escrow swaps — a parallel execution path that taps into private liquidity from professional market makers, or “resolvers.” Instead of relying solely on AMM pools, Omniston now evaluates both public and private sources and routes each swap through whichever delivers the better outcome.

“It’s not a silver bullet, because we need to have both. The combination provides the best experience.”

Tokenized Equities as a Stress Test

The escrow model proved its value when STON.fi integrated xStocks — tokenized representations of US equities issued by Backed Finance. These are technically TON jettons, but they behave differently from crypto-native tokens in ways that matter for execution.

The harder challenge was liquidity: unlike established crypto pairs, xStocks don’t yet have deep AMM pools across pairs. Technically, AMM support is there. But we also introduced an additional execution path — escrow swaps — so users can access deeper liquidity. Today, most xStocks volume executes through escrow.

Advertisement

From the user’s perspective, Fedorov insists the experience should feel identical to any other swap. “We want our users to forget about technical complexity. Under the hood it is different, but users don’t see it.”

The Self-Custody Trade-off

Fedorov is direct about the constraints of remaining fully non-custodial. 

“Sometimes we see solutions with strong traction — big user bases, high volume. From a business standpoint, integrating them would boost our growth immediately. But many of them are centralized. When I bring those options to our technical team, the answer is simple: it doesn’t work like that.” STON.fi is non-custodial. Users keep their assets in their wallets. Swaps are executed by smart contracts.

Centralized integrations are faster and simpler — often just an API connection. DeFi integrations require trustless, contract-level logic where assets never leave the user’s wallet. “We could grow faster if we compromised on custody. But then we wouldn’t be building DeFi infrastructure — we’d be building another fintech layer.”

Advertisement

The trade-off isn’t only technical. It’s educational. Sometimes this creates a marketing and communication challenge. Self-custody shifts responsibility to the user — something many newcomers underestimate. “If someone loses their seed phrase, we can’t restore access. We don’t have it. We’ve never had it. But quite often users still come to us expecting support, like they would from a bank or centralized exchange.”

In centralized systems, there’s a safety net — password reset, account recovery, customer service with override power. In DeFi, security comes from not having that backdoor. The same mechanism that protects users also removes our ability to intervene.

For STON.fi, that means investing more in onboarding, education, and clearer UX — without diluting the core principle of self-custody.

“It’s a long-term bet. In the short term, education is harder. But in the long term, users understand the value of ownership. Especially in Web3, that’s the point.”

Advertisement

Distribution First, Then Depth

Fedorov frames TON not only as a blockchain choice but also as a distribution strategy because of its integration with Telegram. STON.fi and Omniston integrate with wallets, apps, games, and bots across the Telegram ecosystem — each one a potential swap surface. “They want to use the protocol because they want to enable swaps in their applications. But it is also our distribution network. It’s a win-win.”

The next phase is cross-chain aggregation — starting with Tron, then expanding to EVM chains — to unify liquidity across ecosystems rather than just across DEXs on a single chain.

“Make things easier for those who don’t want to think about technical stuff. Get wider distribution by integrating into all the apps. And aggregate liquidity from multiple blockchains, not just one,” Fedorov says. “That’s the roadmap. Now it’s about scaling it.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Polygon Flips Ethereum in Daily Fees as Polymarket Oscar Betting Hits $15M

Published

on

Polygon Flips Ethereum in Daily Fees as Polymarket Oscar Betting Hits $15M

Polygon just pulled off something no one saw coming. It flipped Ethereum in daily transaction fees. For the first time ever.

On Friday alone, Polygon brought in about $407,100 in fees. Ethereum? Around $211,700. That is almost double.

Activity on Polymarket has exploded, and prediction markets are suddenly turning into serious revenue engines.

Key Takeaways
Advertisement
  • Polygon generated $407,100 in daily fees, surpassing Ethereum’s $211,700 for the first time.
  • Polymarket drove the surge with $15 million wagered on a single Oscars betting category.
  • The platform accounted for over $1 million in generated fees on the Layer 2 network in just seven days.

What Is Driving the Fee Flip?

The reason is simple, Polymarket. Oscars pulled in serious retail flow, with more than $15 million wagered on a single category over the weekend.

Source: DefiLlama

Polygon did not climb the fee charts by accident. Almost all of the recent growth came from Polymarket activity, which generated over $1 million in network fees in just a week.

Compared to Polymarket, the next biggest app on Polygon barely made a dent.

Polygon vs Ethereum: The Numbers Behind the Shift

Over the weekend, Polygon briefly pulled ahead in daily fees before the gap tightened again, with both chains trading blows within a narrow range.

Advertisement

The reason is practical. Cost. Polygon transactions average around $0.0026. On Ethereum, you are looking at roughly $1.68. If you are placing multiple small bets or making quick moves, that difference matters. A lot.

Lower fees mean more volume. More volume means more revenue. It is that simple.

At the same time, Ethereum is dealing with its own narrative pressure after large whale movements added volatility concerns. So while Ethereum remains dominant structurally, Polygon is proving that consumer driven activity can shift revenue flows quickly.

Advertisement

The post Polygon Flips Ethereum in Daily Fees as Polymarket Oscar Betting Hits $15M appeared first on Cryptonews.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Crypto Extreme Fear Suggests Incoming Inflection Point

Published

on

Crowd Fear Triggers Bitcoin Bounce, $70K Rally in Focus


Crypto fear drops below zero on Matrixport index, hinting selling pressure may be exhausted and a reversal could be near.

Bitcoin sentiment has dropped to its most pessimistic levels in years, with Matrixport’s proprietary Greed and Fear Index signaling that selling pressure may be nearing exhaustion.

The financial services firm suggested in its most recent analysis that the market could be approaching a turning point, even as prices face continued short-term uncertainty.

Advertisement

Sentiment Plummets to Multi-Year Lows

In a chart published on February 17, Matrixport revealed that its Greed and Fear Index has fallen below zero on its 21-day average, a zone that in past cycles appeared close to price floors.

The model tracks changes in positioning and volatility, and earlier instances of similar readings often occurred shortly before markets stabilized. The note added that prices could still drop further before any recovery, though historically such pessimistic sentiment often coincided with what it called “attractive” entry periods.

“Given the cyclical relationship between sentiment and Bitcoin price action, the latest reading suggests the market may be approaching another inflection point,” the company stated.

Matrixport also pointed out that traders needed to be careful, with the current environment demanding they “sharpen” their focus in preparation for “conditions that typically precede a meaningful rebound.”

And their call isn’t without merit if observable signals like institutional flows are anything to go by. According to Lookonchain, Bitcoin investment products recorded another week of outflows, with $380 million exiting in the last seven days. In that time, BlackRock’s IBIT hemorrhaged 3,538 BTC, closely followed by Fidelity, which saw over 2,000 BTC worth upwards of $143 million withdrawn.

Advertisement

Additionally, while BTC was trading around the $68,000 level at the time of writing, barely slipping in the last 24 hours, the king cryptocurrency is down nearly 3% on the week, with steeper drops on longer timeframes, including a 28% collapse over 30 days and a more than 40% decline across the past six months, per data from CoinGlass.

You may also like:

Derivatives Contraction Signals

Matrixport’s analysts aren’t the only ones who’ve noticed the mood of trepidation in the market. Earlier in the month, Alternative.me’s widely followed Fear and Greed Index told a similar story, dropping to its lowest level since 2019, after Bitcoin shaved about $30,000 from its price in less than ten days.

Interestingly, data shared earlier today by analyst Darkfost pointed to another pressure point. According to them, open interest across exchanges has been shrinking steadily since the October 2025 market top, with positions on Binance down about 39% and declines of approximately 33% on Bybit and 24% on BitMEX.

“This environment indicates that investors are actively reducing exposure, cutting risk, or being forced out through liquidations driven by ongoing volatility,” Darkfost explained. “Under these conditions, it is difficult to envision Bitcoin stabilizing sustainably and reigniting a bullish trend in the short term.”

SPECIAL OFFER (Exclusive)

SECRET PARTNERSHIP BONUS for CryptoPotato readers: Use this link to register and unlock $1,500 in exclusive BingX Exchange rewards (limited time offer).

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Intelligent Document Processing Company | Enterprise IDP Solutions

Published

on

Don’t Just Launch a P2E Game Build One That Lasts

In 2026, documents are no longer passive records. They are high-value operational assets. Invoices dictate cash velocity. Contracts determine legal exposure. KYC forms influence compliance posture. Insurance claims impact profitability. Regulatory filings define reputational stability. Yet most enterprises still rely on rule-based OCR tools that fail to understand context, interpret intent, or scale with unstructured data growth.

According to industry research from Mordor Intelligence: The global Intelligent Document Processing market is growing rapidly due to AI adoption, automation demand, and regulatory pressures. Similarly, Fortune Business Insights projects significant expansion of IDP across BFSI, healthcare, and logistics: This transformation is not incremental. It is structural. Partnering with a Top Intelligent Document Processing Company is no longer an operational decision; it is a strategic one.

Modern Intelligent Document Processing Solutions combine:

  • Artificial Intelligence (AI)
  • Machine Learning (ML)
  • Natural Language Processing (NLP)
  • Large Language Models (LLMs)
  • Computer Vision
  • Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
  • Workflow orchestration

The result? A self-optimizing document lifecycle engine that extracts, validates, interprets, and routes information autonomously.

What is Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)?

Enterprise Intelligent Document Processing is an AI-driven automation framework that transforms document-heavy workflows into structured, validated, and decision-ready intelligence streams.

Advertisement

Unlike traditional OCR which captures text without understanding, AI-Based Intelligent Document Processing Solutions interpret relationships, intent, risk signals, and contextual meaning within documents. According to Gartner, IDP combines:

  • Artificial Intelligence (AI)
  • Machine Learning (ML)
  • Optical Character Recognition (OCR)
  • Natural Language Processing (NLP)
  • Analytics

To convert structured and unstructured documents into reliable business data, thus reducing manual effort while accelerating enterprise decision cycles.

How a Leading Intelligent Document Processing Company Delivers Value

Capture Seamlessly

Documents are ingested across omnichannel inputs email, APIs, mobile uploads, cloud repositories, scanners, and enterprise applications. Advanced pre-processing enhances image quality, ensuring the accuracy of downstream extraction.

Extract Intelligently

Advertisement

Using computer vision and domain-trained models, the platform extracts:

  • Structured fields
  • Multi-level tables
  • Handwritten inputs
  • Clause-level intelligence

Models continuously self-improve through feedback loops, reducing template dependency and manual retraining.

Interpret Context

LLMs and NLP engines evaluate semantic meaning, detect anomalies, identify contractual risk, and distinguish between similar data elements while maintaining explainability and traceability. 

Validate Dynamically

Advertisement

Data is cross-validated against ERP, CRM, compliance rules, and external databases. Confidence thresholds and rule engines ensure only high-integrity data proceeds downstream. 

Orchestrate Autonomously

Integrated with RPA and workflow engines, the system routes documents, triggers actions, and escalates exceptions using intelligent human-in-the-loop (HITL) controls.

Generate Decision Intelligence

Advertisement

Modern Intelligent Document Processing Solutions go beyond extraction; they deliver:

  • Automated contract summaries
  • Fraud pattern detection
  • Cross-document analysis
  • Conversational document querying

Why Enterprise Intelligent Document Processing is Dominating 2026

  1. The Explosion of Unstructured Data

Industry reports consistently highlight that most enterprise data remains unstructured. Emails, PDFs, contracts, ESG disclosures, and scanned forms contain high-value insights but lack structured formatting.

Persistence Market Research forecasts continued enterprise adoption of IDP technologies for unstructured data management. A leading Intelligent Document Processing Company transforms unstructured chaos into structured intelligence in real time.

  1. Regulatory Complexity & Compliance Automation

Regulatory frameworks such as financial compliance mandates, healthcare documentation rules, and data protection standards are increasing globally. Organizations are adopting Enterprise Intelligent Document Processing to ensure:

  • Complete audit trails
  • Automated validation
  • Reduced human error
  • Secure data handling

AIIM’s industry survey shows enterprises accelerating IDP adoption beyond basic automation into compliance and governance applications. Compliance is no longer reactive. It is algorithmically enforced.

  1. Generative AI Is Transforming Document Intelligence

The integration of LLMs into document workflows is redefining how enterprises interact with data. Gartner research on Generative AI’s impact on document processing highlights how AI models are enhancing contextual understanding and reasoning. Modern AI-Based Intelligent Document Processing Solutions now enable:

  • Automated contract summarization
  • Risk clause identification
  • Conversational document querying
  • Compliance gap analysis
  • Executive-ready reporting

Documents are becoming interactive intelligence systems.

  1. Operational Efficiency & Cost Optimization

Expert Market Research projects continued market growth driven by cost-reduction initiatives and automation acceleration. Organizations implementing Enterprise Intelligent Document Processing commonly report:

  • Reduced processing time
  • Lower operational costs
  • Improved SLA adherence
  • Faster decision cycles
  • Reduced fraud exposure

This is operational leverage at scale.

Our Intelligent Document Processing Solutions

As a leading Intelligent Document Processing Company, we engineer enterprise-grade platforms built for scale, security, and performance.

AI-Powered Document Classification

Advertisement

Our Enterprise Intelligent Document Processing platform auto-classifies:

  • Invoices vs. Purchase Orders
  • KYC vs. onboarding forms
  • Claims vs. policies
  • Contracts vs. amendments

Models continuously learn and adapt to new document formats.

Advanced Contextual Data Extraction

Unlike static OCR templates, our AI-Based Intelligent Document Processing Solutions extract:

  • Multi-level tables
  • Financial figures
  • Embedded metadata
  • Signatures and stamps
  • Clause-level intelligence

This capability aligns with multimodal AI advancements described in emerging IDP research.

Generative AI Document Reasoning

Advertisement

We integrate LLM-driven reasoning to deliver:

  • Contract summaries in seconds
  • Comparative clause analysis
  • Risk detection
  • Cross-document anomaly identification
  • Conversational search interfaces

Enterprise Intelligent Document Processing is evolving into autonomous reasoning engines.

Human-in-the-Loop Governance

Enterprise accuracy demands oversight.

Our Intelligent Document Processing Solutions include:

Advertisement
  • Confidence scoring
  • Smart exception handling
  • Validation workflows
  • Continuous retraining

This hybrid AI-human model ensures compliance-grade precision.

Enterprise Integrations & Infrastructure

A top-tier Intelligent Document Processing Company must integrate seamlessly with:

  • ERP systems
  • CRM platforms
  • RPA environments
  • Cloud storage
  • Hybrid infrastructure

Gartner’s Magic Quadrant resource for IDP vendors demonstrates the increasing enterprise integration maturity of the sector:

Security & Compliance by Design

Security is foundational in our AI-Based Intelligent Document Processing Solutions:

Advertisement
  • End-to-end encryption
  • Role-based access controls
  • Immutable audit logs
  • Zero-trust architecture

Enterprise security cannot be an afterthought.

Industry-Specific Impact of Enterprise Intelligent Document Processing

Enterprise Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) is no longer a horizontal efficiency tool; it has evolved into a verticalized transformation engine tailored to the regulatory, operational, and risk dynamics of specific industries. By combining AI-driven extraction, contextual intelligence, validation engines, and workflow orchestration, IDP delivers measurable impact across high-document-volume sectors.

Banking & Financial Services

  • Automated KYC verification
  • Loan document structuring
  • Fraud anomaly detection
  • Regulatory audit readiness

Insurance

  • Claims data extraction
  • Underwriting risk validation
  • Policy clause digitization

Healthcare

  • Patient onboarding automation
  • Medical record digitization
  • Insurance eligibility validation

Legal

  • Contract lifecycle automation
  • Clause-level risk detection
  • Due diligence acceleration

Logistics & Supply Chain

  • Bill of lading automation
  • Three-way invoice matching
  • Trade compliance validation

Key Benefits of Choosing a Top Intelligent Document Processing Company

Choosing a leading Intelligent Document Processing Company is not just a technology upgrade; it’s a strategic enterprise transformation decision. High-performing Enterprise Intelligent Document Processing Solutions drive measurable gains in efficiency, financial performance, compliance strength, and scalable growth.

  1. Structural Cost Reduction

Automation reduces manual review dependency and operational overhead.

  1. Accelerated Processing Cycles

Straight-through processing eliminates bottlenecks and improves customer responsiveness.

  1. Higher Data Accuracy

Continuous model training reduces correction rates and increases confidence scores.

  1. Embedded Compliance Governance

Validation engines and audit logs reduce regulatory exposure.

  1. Enterprise-Grade Scalability

Cloud-native, API-driven architecture scales across geographies and departments.

  1. Real-Time Decision Intelligence

Structured document data feeds dashboards, analytics, and AI models instantly.

2026 Trends Shaping the Future of IDP

Intelligent Document Processing is rapidly evolving from a tactical automation tool into a strategic enterprise intelligence layer powered by AI, generative reasoning, and autonomous workflows. Multiple industry sources and market analyses show that IDP is transitioning from static extraction toward adaptive, context-aware, and integrated intelligence systems.

  1. Multimodal AI Unlocks Next-Gen Document Understanding

Modern IDP platforms combine computer vision, NLP, and deep learning to interpret text, layout, images, tables, and handwritten inputs simultaneously. This enables systems to understand both structure and meaning across complex, multi-format documents. The result is higher automation accuracy and contextual intelligence beyond traditional OCR limitations.

  1. Intelligent, Agentic Reasoning Engines

IDP is evolving into an AI-driven reasoning layer that not only extracts data but also evaluates context, detects risk, and recommends actions. By embedding large language models and validation logic, platforms can autonomously interpret intent and support decision-making. Documents are no longer processed; they are analyzed and reasoned over.

  1. Zero-Touch & Autonomous Workflow Orchestration

Organizations are adopting zero-touch workflows where high-confidence documents move through validation and system updates without human intervention. Confidence scoring, real-time rule checks, and intelligent exception routing minimize manual review. This dramatically reduces cycle times while preserving governance and auditability.

  1. Regulatory & ESG Reporting Automation

With the expansion of global compliance mandates, IDP is increasingly used to extract, validate, and structure regulatory and ESG disclosures. Automated audit trails and rule-based verification improve transparency and reporting accuracy. This capability is becoming essential for risk management and corporate accountability.

  1. Cloud-First & Integrated Enterprise Architectures

Cloud-native IDP deployments offer elastic scalability, global accessibility, and seamless integration with ERP, CRM, and automation platforms. API-driven connectivity enables real-time data exchange across enterprise ecosystems. IDP is shifting from a standalone tool to a foundational layer within intelligent automation stacks.

Why Choose Us as Your Intelligent Document Processing Company?

Our Intelligent Document Processing Solutions are built on:

AI-First Architecture

Advertisement

Built from the ground up with artificial intelligence at its core, enabling adaptive learning, contextual understanding, and long-term scalability. This ensures smarter automation that evolves with your business.

Domain-Trained Enterprise Models

Industry-specific AI models designed to understand complex documents in regulated sectors. They deliver higher accuracy, reduced risk, and minimal manual intervention.

Generative AI Reasoning

Advertisement

Advanced AI that not only extracts data but also interprets intent, summarizes content, and identifies risks. It transforms documents into actionable intelligence.

Secure, Scalable Infrastructure

Enterprise-grade architecture with robust security, compliance controls, and cloud scalability. Designed to handle high volumes while maintaining resilience and governance.

Dedicated AI Architects

Advertisement

Expert AI strategists who align automation with your business objectives and continuously optimize performance. We act as long-term transformation partners, not just vendors.

Continuous Optimization

Ongoing monitoring, model refinement, and workflow enhancement to maximize ROI. Your automation improves over time as business needs evolve.

The Autonomous Enterprise Starts Here

The document-heavy enterprise of the past cannot thrive in an AI-driven economy where speed, intelligence, and adaptability define market leaders. A Top Intelligent Document Processing Company transforms static documents into actionable intelligence, operational friction into measurable velocity, and compliance complexity into strategic strength.

Advertisement

Modern Enterprise Intelligent Document Processing now serves as the core digital infrastructure powering automation, real-time insight, governance control, and data-driven decision-making at scale. Organizations that embed IDP deeply within their workflows accelerate performance, reduce risk exposure, and unlock sustainable growth.

The question is no longer whether to adopt IDP but how fast you can deploy it. Partner with Antier to build a secure, future-ready foundation for an autonomous enterprise.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Russian man arrested over alleged crypto-linked terror financing

Published

on

Russian man arrested over alleged crypto-linked terror financing

Authorities in Russia’s Republic of Dagestan have opened a criminal investigation against a local man suspected of financing terrorism, the state news agency TASS reported.

Summary

  • Russian authorities have opened a criminal case against a Dagestan resident suspected of financing terrorism, according to TASS.
  • Investigators in Makhachkala allege the man provided funds or material support linked to extremist activity, though specific details have not been disclosed.
  • The case comes amid heightened global scrutiny of cryptocurrency’s potential role in illicit finance, as the EU moves to tighten restrictions on Russian crypto-related transactions.

Russian arrested as scrutiny grows over crypto and terror financing

The case was initiated by investigators in Makhachkala, the region’s capital, where a man is accused of providing funds or material support that could have been used to assist extremist activities. The move reflects ongoing efforts by Russian law enforcement to clamp down on suspected financial networks linked to terrorism.

According to the TASS report, specific details about the actions that triggered the probe have not been disclosed publicly, but the initiation of a formal criminal case indicates that authorities believe there are sufficient grounds to pursue charges.

Advertisement

The suspect is currently under investigation while law enforcement continues to gather evidence.

Russia has been actively investigating and prosecuting individuals and groups accused of involvement in terrorism-related activity, particularly in the North Caucasus region where separatist and extremist networks have historically been a concern for federal authorities. Previous high-profile terrorism cases have drawn significant media attention and have often involved complex financial structures alleged to support violent acts.

The investigation comes amid heightened global attention on the role cryptocurrencies can play in illicit finance. Law enforcement agencies in Europe and elsewhere have increasingly warned that digital assets, particularly when routed through opaque or loosely regulated services, can create opportunities for money laundering, sanction evasion, and covert transfers.

Advertisement

This dynamic has placed crypto transactions under close watch by both national security and financial regulators.

Meanwhile, the European Union is preparing a sweeping ban on cryptocurrency transactions involving Russian entities as part of its latest sanctions package, aiming to close loopholes that allowed sanctioned actors to shift value via digital asset service providers.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Germany Central Bank President Endorses Crypto Stablecoins Under EU MiCA Framework

Published

on

Germany Central Bank President Endorses Crypto Stablecoins Under EU MiCA Framework

The head of the Germany Bundesbank is now openly backing euro based crypto stablecoins and even a retail CBDC. That is a big shift.

Joachim Nagel is not framing this as optional. He says Europe needs these tools to protect itself from the dominance of the US dollar.

The tone has changed from cautious to urgent. With the EU pushing ahead on MiCA rules, Europe clearly does not want to fall behind the US in shaping the future of digital money.

Key Takeaways
Advertisement
  • Strategic Pivot: Bundesbank President Nagel backs private stablecoins to reduce cross-border payment costs and bolster EU financial independence.
  • Monetary Sovereignty: The move aims to counter the dominance of USD-pegged assets, which currently control the majority of the stablecoin market.
  • Wholesale Innovation: Nagel specifically highlighted wholesale CBDCs for enabling programmable payments between financial institutions.

Why Is The Germany Bundesbank Pushing for Crypto Adoption Now?

This is not just policy talk. It is about control of the digital payment rails. Speaking in Frankfurt, Nagel made it clear that Europe needs to secure its own settlement infrastructure before it falls further behind.

Source: Joachim Nagel

Dollar backed stablecoins already command more than $310 billion in market value. Euro based liquidity is tiny in comparison. That gap worries regulators. Without a serious alternative, Europe risks drifting into what some call digital dollarization.

And the clock is ticking. The US is moving quickly on stablecoin legislation, which could lock in dollar dominance even deeper. Nagel stance reflects a push to protect monetary sovereignty before the balance tilts too far.

The Blueprint: Programmable Money and Wholesale CBDCs

Nagel drew a clear line between retail tools and banking infrastructure. For institutions, he favors a wholesale CBDC that would let banks settle programmable payments directly in central bank money. That is something traditional systems simply cannot do today.

Advertisement

For the private sector, he is more open to stablecoins. He acknowledged that euro denominated stablecoins could offer cheap and efficient cross border payments for both individuals and businesses.

The tone is noticeably different from recent warnings about the risks of foreign stablecoins dominating the system. Now the focus is on building competitive euro based options instead of just sounding the alarm. It shows how quickly the global conversation around digital payments is evolving.

Can the Euro Compete with the Dollar?

The upside is huge if Europe actually follows through. S&P Global Ratings estimates euro pegged stablecoins could reach €570 billion by 2030 under normal adoption trends. That is not niche. That is systemic scale.

But regulation cuts both ways. MiCA gives Europe clearer rules than the US right now, yet strict capital requirements could slow innovation if applied too aggressively.

At the same time, political scrutiny around foreign digital assets is rising everywhere. The fight over stablecoin dominance will not just play out on chain. It will unfold in legislative chambers too.

The key is timing. Both the US and Europe are moving on final rules. A digital Euro is no longer theoretical. The only question left is how quickly it rolls out.

The post Germany Central Bank President Endorses Crypto Stablecoins Under EU MiCA Framework appeared first on Cryptonews.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Crypto slides as tech stocks and gold retreat; bitcoin-Nasdaq correlation turns positive

Published

on

What next as bitcoin drops to $78,000 and Saylor’s bet faces pressure

The crypto market continued to exhibit weakness on Tuesday morning, broadly following a tech selloff across U.S. equities and a correction in the price of precious metals.

Bitcoin trades at $68,000, down 1.25% since midnight UTC, while Nasdaq futures and gold lost 0.55% and 2.4% respectively over the same period.

Altcoins also lost ground as popular memecoins PEPE, DOGE and TRUMP led the drawdown, losing between 3.5% and 4.5%.

The tech selloff has been driven by fears around artificial intelligence and how it might disrupt several industries. Bitcoin has been closely tied to Nasdaq since Feb. 3, with the correlation coefficient indicator rising from negative 0.68 to positive 0.72 over the past two weeks.

Advertisement

Gold, meanwhile, is currently trading at $4,928 after failing to establish a level of support above $5,000. The precious metal hit a record high of $5,600 on Jan. 28 before a historic 21.5% correction over the subsequent four days.

Derivatives positioning

  • Crypto futures continue to see capital outflows. The cumulative industry wide notional open interest has declined by 1.5% to $93 billion in 24 hours, reaching fresh multi-month lows.
  • Leveraged bets worth $229 billion have been liquidated by exchanges over 24 hours, with longs (bullish plays) accounting for most of the tally.
  • Open interest in DOGE futures has declined by 4%, leading the trend in most majors. PEPE, LINK and AVAX have seen 3% to 5% declines in open interest.
  • Open interest in futures tied to HYPE, the recent outperformer, has cooled to 44.45 million HYPE, the lowest since early December. This likely reflects profit-taking after the token outpeformed bitcoin and other majors during the recent crash.
  • The market panic has ebbed, as evidenced from the sharp pullback in bitcoin and ether’s implied volatility indices from monthly highs.
  • On Deribit, bitcoin and ether puts continue to trade pricier than calls, indicating lingering downside fears, however, the positioning is now longer as defensive as it was two weeks ago.

Token talk

  • Altcoins continue to track bitcoin on as the “bitcoin dominance” metric has now ranged between 57.4% and 60.1% since September.
  • Over the past seven days AI token MORPHO has posted a 23.5% gain, while privacy coin zcash is up by 19% over the same period.
  • Conversely, layer 1 blockchain token layer zero (ZRO) has lost 16% over the past week as it continues to lose momentum after announcing a deal to collaborate with Citadel Securities and DTCC.
  • The relative weakness of several altcoins continues to persist on lower time frames, with HYPE, SUI and ASTER all losing between 3% and 4.8% since midnight UTC as the crypto market awaits a bullish catalyst.

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

President Trump signals final push on US crypto market rules

Published

on

President Trump signals final push on US crypto market rules

Congress races to finalize US crypto market rules as Trump-backed bill nears passage, splitting SEC–CFTC powers and setting deadlines on exchanges and stablecoins.

President Donald Trump confirmed that comprehensive cryptocurrency market structure legislation is approaching passage, according to recent statements from the administration.

Advertisement

The legislation, identified as S. 3755/H.R. 3633, would formally divide regulatory oversight between the Securities and Exchange Commission for securities and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission for commodities. The framework includes provisions for provisional registration of exchanges within 180 days of enactment.

The House of Representatives passed the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act in July, establishing a framework that splits oversight responsibilities between the CFTC and SEC. The Senate has presented the primary obstacle to advancement.

In late January, the Senate Agriculture Committee advanced the Digital Commodity Intermediaries Act by a vote of 12 to 11, according to committee records.

Industry participants, including cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase, have criticized earlier versions of the legislation, stating the drafts imposed excessive restrictions on decentralized finance protocols and stablecoin regulations.

Advertisement

CFTC launches CEO Innovation Council for crypto oversightUnder the proposed framework, the CFTC would assume primary regulatory authority over digital commodities including Bitcoin and Ethereum. The legislation provides brokers and exchanges a 180-day registration window to obtain provisional status following enactment.

CFTC Chairman Michael Selig has indicated the bill could reach the President’s desk within months, according to public statements. The framework would require joint SEC and CFTC rulemaking within 18 months to address complex areas including mixed transactions and margin structures.

The Senate Banking Committee must reconcile its version with the Agriculture Committee’s draft before the February 28 White House deadline for stablecoin frameworks, according to congressional schedules.

Congressional leaders continue to call for investigations into Trump-linked cryptocurrency ventures, including WLFI, according to statements from members of Congress.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

GBP/JPY Falls to a Year-to-Date Low

Published

on

GBP/JPY Falls to a Year-to-Date Low

As the GBP/JPY chart shows, the pound has dropped below the 12 February low against the Japanese yen, marking its weakest level since the beginning of 2026. The pair last traded beneath the 207.500 mark in mid-December 2025.

→ The yen’s strength is supported by expectations that economic stimulus measures introduced by Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, in coordination with the Bank of Japan, will underpin the national currency. Barclays forecasts further appreciation of the yen.

→ Sterling weakened today following reports that UK unemployment reached a five-year high in December, while wage growth slowed. This may reinforce arguments in favour of additional interest rate cuts by the Bank of England.

Technical Analysis of GBP/JPY

Long-term moving averages are turning lower, signalling potential structural shifts and possible capital reallocation after five years of an overall uptrend in GBP/JPY.

Price action is forming a well-defined descending channel. In this context:
→ the median line has switched from acting as support to serving as resistance (as highlighted by the thicker lines);
→ today, GBP/JPY is trading in the lower quarter of the channel, indicating continued bearish dominance.

Advertisement

It is worth noting that yesterday’s breakout above local resistance (marked by an arrow) proved to be false, triggering renewed downward momentum.

On the other hand, after dipping below the 12 February low near 207.560, the pair has started to rebound, raising the possibility of a mirrored move and a false bearish breakout.

Nevertheless, the outlook for bulls remains challenging. Even if they manage to push prices slightly higher, they may encounter resistance around 208.315 — a level where sellers previously demonstrated strength when breaking local support (shown in purple).

Trade over 50 forex markets 24 hours a day with FXOpen. Take advantage of low commissions, deep liquidity, and spreads from 0.0 pips (additional fees may apply). Open your FXOpen account now or learn more about trading forex with FXOpen.

Advertisement

This article represents the opinion of the Companies operating under the FXOpen brand only. It is not to be construed as an offer, solicitation, or recommendation with respect to products and services provided by the Companies operating under the FXOpen brand, nor is it to be considered financial advice.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025