Three U.S. Secret Service officials were placed on administrative leave Tuesday, pending the outcome of an investigation by the agency’s professional standards office.

The three were operating in non-law-enforcement capacities and were being investigated for potential misconduct, the agency’s public information office reported. However, the cause for the action remained unclear as the Office of Professional Responsibility was beginning its review.

The Secret Service has been under scrutiny as President Donald Trump has been the subject of at least three assassination plots in the past two years. In April, police said an armed man breached security at the Washington Hilton during the White House Correspondents’ Association dinner, which Trump was attending.

Country singer Blake Shelton, who worked with Parton on the American television series The Voice wrote: “I can say with absolute certainty that we are all feeling the same heart brokenness today.”

“I want everyone to know that she was the EXACT person that you think she is,” he added. “It was like being with the funnest, most loving, most caring and closest member of your family.”

On social media, American singer and actress Dionne Warwick said her “heart is heavy”.

“I will certainly miss her laughter, jokes and her being. Rest well and in total peace my friend,” she wrote.

Former wife of Elvis Presley, Priscilla Presley, recalled: “After Elvis and I left the courthouse following our divorce, he sang [I Will Always Love You] to me as we walked down the steps together.”

“Her music touched all of us, but it was Dolly’s warmth, humour and enormous heart that made her truly one of a kind,” Presley added.

Parton, who was known for her roles in the movies 9 to 5 and Steel Magnolias, as well as the show Hannah Montana, was remembered fondly by many actors.

Seth MacFarlane said that when working with Parton, who guest-starred on his show The Orville, “her kindness, generosity, and authenticity were evident from moment one”.

“I’m devastated. Truly”, actress Keke Palmer said alongside a photo of her and Parton. The pair starred in the 2012 musical Joyful Noise.

Actress Jamie Lee Curtis said Parton was a hero who “is a great example for us all”.

Fashion designer Donatella Versace said: “The world has lost one of the kindest and most generous of souls, the greatest of story tellers and a true legend of music.”

Dolly Parton has died at the age of 80, prompting a wave of tributes

Dolly Parton passed away following a “brief battle with cancer”, her representatives have confirmed.

In a statement issued to PEOPLE magazine on Tuesday (August 25), the country legend’s team confirmed that the star died aged 80 after a cancer diagnosis. The specific type of cancer has not been disclosed.

“Our beloved Dolly Parton spent her life and career bringing joy, laughter, hope and integrity into everything she touched,” the statement read.

“Her unmatched generosity reached the lives of countless people whom she would never meet, yet she was always there to offer a helping hand. Whether it be the hundreds of millions of books donated through her invaluable Imagination Library or funding research that helped create a lifesaving vaccine used around the world, Dolly’s unconditional love for all people was the guiding force for her lasting impact.”

The statement concluded: “After bravely facing a brief battle with cancer, Dolly departed her Earthly life today at the Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center surrounded by loved ones.”

Parton died on Tuesday, with her nephew Bryan Seaver breaking the devastating news to the world via a heartfelt social media post the same day.

According to PEOPLE, Parton was admitted to a Nashville-area hospital on Friday (August 21), where she passed away four days later.

We bought a new house. When we moved in, the sellers had left a broken washing machine full of clothes, a broken fridge-freezer, dirty dishes and unwanted furniture. We had to pay to have it cleared. Can we claim the money back from the seller?

Name and address supplied.

Potentially, yes – and your position could be quite strong.

When you buy a property, the seller will generally be required to give you vacant possession on completion.

That means you should be able to move into the property and enjoy it without being confronted by the seller’s belongings, furniture or rubbish, unless you agreed that particular items could remain.

From what you describe, you did not agree to take these items. A broken washing machine containing the seller’s clothes, a broken fridge-freezer, dirty dishes and unwanted furniture are not things you should ordinarily be expected to deal with after completion.

If the seller was contractually obliged to give vacant possession, leaving these items could amount to a breach of contract. If you then had to pay a reasonable amount to have them removed and disposed of, you can seek to recover that cost from the seller as a loss resulting from the breach.

There is one important caveat: check the contract and the TA10 Fittings and Contents Form you signed during the buying process to make sure none of the items were agreed to be left at the property.

I would write to the seller, explain that the property was not handed over in the agreed condition, provide photographs and the clearance invoice, and ask them to reimburse the reasonable cost of removal.

Do not overstate your claim by demanding compensation for the inconvenience. Your strongest claim is for the actual, reasonable cost you incurred in clearing up.

My daughter lives on a street where finding a parking space is difficult. Her neighbour recently had the kerb outside her house dropped, even though she can’t park in her front garden because it has a wall. The neighbour says because the kerb is now dropped – lowered to enable access to off-road parking – no one else is allowed to park outside her house.

When my daughter did park there due to a lack of spaces, an egg was thrown at her car. Is the neighbour right about the kerb?

S.N., Northampton.

The neighbour is wrong. A dropped kerb confers no ownership of the road, and creates no private parking space.

The highway outside a house remains public and, unless there are specific restrictions in place, such as yellow lines, a residents’ bay or similar, anyone may generally park there. Having a kerb lowered does not reserve that stretch of Tarmac for the homeowner and the neighbour cannot simply declare it hers.

The fact that she can’t even use her front garden for parking, because a wall still blocks it, rather underlines the point.

There is, however, one genuine note of caution and this is where the distinction matters. Parking on the road near the property is fine, but parking directly across the dropped section is another matter.

Under the Traffic Management Act 2004, parking across a dropped footway is a civil parking contravention that councils can enforce with a penalty notice.

Be aware, too, that some councils will enforce this even where the resident has no usable driveway and, occasionally, even if the resident hasn’t complained. So your daughter would be wise to check her council’s stance as it varies from area to area.

What troubles me far more is the egg. Throwing an object at a vehicle could amount to criminal damage if any harm is caused, with repeated targeting potentially crossing into harassment.

My advice: avoid all confrontation. Photograph the dropped kerb, the wall and any signs or road markings, and keep a dated record of every incident.

If it happens again, especially if her car is damaged or she feels threatened, she should report it to the police.

The fast-food chain prepares to reopen its doors in just over a week.

The drive-thru restaurant on Allensway in Thornaby has been closed since the start of August while work takes place on a full renovation of the site.

Now, with the reopening date fast approaching, McDonald’s has shared a video showing the transformation underway inside the Teesside restaurant and reminded customers that they won’t have to wait too much longer.

The final changes are being made at the Allensway site (Image: Teesside McDonald’s)

New ovens are coming to a McDonald’s in Teesside (Image: Teesside McDonald’s)

In a social media post, the company said: “Just a friendly reminder, Thornaby!

“Your local McDonald’s is having a well-earned glow up and will reopen, better than ever, at 11am on 2nd September.”

While McDonald’s has not revealed every detail of the project, footage shared online shows construction work taking place throughout the restaurant as staff prepare to return.

Stockton Council approved plans for the site, including a new drive-thru order display canopy, alterations to the shop front, doors and glazing, as well as new digital display boards and internal signage.

While the final renovations are being completed, McDonald’s says customers can continue to enjoy their favourite menu items at its nearby Teesside Park and Yarm Road sites.

The restaurant, which opened in 2014, is expected to welcome customers back from 11am on Wednesday, September 2, after around a month of refurbishment work.

Gamescom 2026’s Opening Night Live event has revealed not only a current gen remaster for The Witcher 3 but CD Projekt are giving away its expansions for nothing.

It’s 11 years since the release of The Witcher 3 and while it’s one of the best-selling video games of all-time you would assume that its moment had passed, especially as developer CD Projekt has already announced a sequel. It’s not clear when that will be out though, so to get people excited about the series again CD Projekt has done more than just announce new DLC.

Releasing a major expansion for such an old game is unprecedented, although in hindsight it’s a great idea for creating a story bridge between the two titles. However, relatively little was shown of the DLC, called Songs Of The Past, at Gamescom on Tuesday evening, with the focus instead being on the previously unannounced The Witcher 3 Remastered.

It appears to be a major upgrade for the original game, not just in terms of visuals, but with promised changes to the combat, traversal system, horse-riding, skill tree, and much more.

This is excellent news because even at the time of the original release, the game was criticised for its weak combat. Although it’s surprising there’s no mention at all about improving the awkward inventory system, which was the other major complaint.

There may be more to the final release though, as CD Projekt developer Miles Toast appeared on stage to talk about the remaster and he described a revamped ability system, which isn’t specifically mentioned in the trailer.

The best news is that all of this is completely free, if you already own the original game on GOG, Steam, Epic Games Store, PlayStation 5, or Xbox Series X/S. You can even claim it for free on Nintendo Switch 2, if you already own the Switch 1 version. It’ll also be available on Battle.net for the first time.

As if the pot was not sweet enough, on top of that you get the existing expansions Hearts Of Stone and Blood And Wine for free too, either because you already had the base game or when you buy the remastered version separately.

What are the new features in The Witcher 3 Remastered?

A lot has changed for the remaster, although CD Projekt hasn’t gone into detail about any of them. The first 10 changes listed below are the ones most clearly highlighted during the trailer, whereas the others appear in small print for a split second, as they scroll up the screen.

1. Upgraded visuals
2. Enhanced combat
3. Improved traversal and movement
4. New witcher signs FX
5. Revamped mount handling
6. Enhanced monster behaviours
7. Skill tree revamp
8. Transmogrification
9. Expanded photo mode
10. New finishers

• Cross platform mod support
• Immersive meditation
• Refined animations
• New quest tracking
• UI improvements
• Looting rework
• Refreshed motion blur
• New accessibility features
• Updated textures
• Foliage shading rework
• Tutorial modernisation
• HDR improvements
• GTAO [ground-truth ambient occlusion]
• Improved menu navigation
• Ray tracing improvements
• Global lighting rework
• New shading model
• Subsurface scattering
• New tone mapper
• PlayStation 5 Pro support
• Xbox Play Anywhere support
• Nintendo Switch 2 exclusive features
• Nvidia DLSS 4.5
• AMD FSR 4
• Intel XESS 2.0
• Path tracing on PC
• Ray reconstruction on PC
• Ray-traced hair
• Native DX12
• Rendering parallelisation

What is The Witcher 3 Remastered release date?

You really can’t ask for more than that, especially as the remaster is out very soon, on September 29. Considering how often the DLC was leaked it’s remarkable that CD Projekt has kept it secret, especially as it’s been made by an external developer called Yigsoft.

Songs Of The Past is being developed by Fool’s Theory, which is made up of a lot of The Witcher veterans. The same studio is also supposed to be doing The Witcher 1 remake, although nothing has been said or seen of that in a long time.

The original The Witcher game (which, to be honest, wasn’t very good) did get mentioned though, as the new chain weapon you can see in the Songs Of The Past trailer is a nod to that game’s intro. It wasn’t mentioned, but it also seems to be the same weapon Ciri uses in The Witcher 4 teaser trailer, so you can probably see where CD Projekt is going with that.

Not a lot was shown of the new expansion, but it will take advantage of all the improvements from the remastered version. The idea that it segues into The Witcher 4 is still only a theory though, as CD Projekt has never actually said that’s what it’s about.

Geralt seems to be fighting tree monsters though, that look kind of like an evil Groot, and the expansion takes place on the continent of Letten, where the character of Dandelion is from.

Email gamecentral@metro.co.uk, leave a comment below, follow us on Twitter.

To submit Inbox letters and Reader’s Features more easily, without the need to send an email, just use our Submit Stuff page here.

For more stories like this, check our Gaming page.

MORE: Gears Of War: E-Day preview – sandbox spectacle meets linear action

MORE: Mass Effect successor Exodus announces 2027 release date at Gamescom

MORE: Nintendo brings back Mario Kart World bundle but it’s more expensive now

For decades, the answer to “how much sleep does an adult need?” has been simple: eight hours. The idea dates back to the mid-19th century when the notion of eight hours of work, eight for recreation and eight for sleep first took hold.

But growing evidence suggests that eight hours may not be the ideal amount of sleep for everyone, as a new narrative review in Brain Medicine reminds us.

To find out how much people naturally sleep, researchers have studied hunter-gatherer communities whose lifestyles are closer to those of our ancestors and who have little or no access to artificial light. In one early study, researchers found that people in Tanzania, Namibia and Bolivia slept for between 5.7 and 7.1 hours a night. These short sleep durations can’t be attributed to traffic noise, social media use or too much artificial light at night.

The short nights also seemed to be enough: people did not make up for them with long daytime naps. Without an alarm clock, they tended to wake close to dawn, regardless of the day of the week.

Exactly how long people are found to sleep in pre-industrialised societies varies depending on how sleep is measured, where people live, the season and other environmental factors. But one recent analysis estimated the average to be 6.4 hours.

So, is eight hours too much? These studies make an important assumption that the amount people naturally sleep is the amount they need. That assumes that hunter-gatherers are free from stress, busy schedules and other pressures on sleep. But is that really the case?

We also don’t know whether people in these societies experience the same health problems linked to too little sleep that are seen in modern societies. So their shorter sleep may not be as strong an argument against eight hours as it first appears.

But other evidence has emerged from large studies looking at the relationship between sleep and health in industrialised societies.

If we define optimal sleep as the amount linked to the best health, many large studies suggest the sweet spot may be less than eight hours. One recent study used brain and body scans and molecular measures to look at how sleep relates to the ageing of different organs. It estimated the optimal amount to be between 6.4 and 7.8 hours, depending on the person’s sex and the organ being studied.

Many studies find that both too little and too much sleep are linked to poorer health, including heart disease, stroke, cognitive decline and obesity. But scientists are still debating whether too much sleep causes poor health or is instead an early sign of it. Either way, these findings challenge the idea that everyone needs exactly eight hours and suggest that consistently sleeping for much longer may be worth paying attention to.

However, all these estimates of optimal sleep duration are based on averages, and the average person does not exist. When given enough opportunity to sleep, studies find that young adults sleep longer than healthy older adults. Even people of the same age can need very different amounts of sleep.

Current sleep duration recommendations, from the National Sleep Foundation in the US, reflect these individual differences. It says that adults aged 26 to 64 should get between seven and nine hours of sleep per day, but that sleeping between six and ten hours may be appropriate for some adults. That is a long way from the one-size-fits-all eight-hour rule.

When you sleep matters

But there is more to sleep than the hours we get. An important feature of modern sleep patterns is not that they are shorter than they once were, but that they are delayed relative to the natural light-dark cycle. Most of us do not wake naturally before dawn. Many of us have short sleep during the working week and longer catch-up sleep on work-free days.

Artificial light is recognised as the main driver of this shift. It changes our sleep habits and delays our body clock, which controls the timing of sleep and wakefulness.

Irregular sleep is also common, particularly among shift workers and university students. Irregular sleep is linked to poorer health. But if you lose sleep during the week, catching up on some of it at the weekend appears to be better than not catching up at all – even though it makes your sleep pattern less regular. So regularity matters, but so does the total amount of sleep you get over a week or longer.

The eight-hour rule is clearly too simple. People need different amounts of sleep, and when we sleep matters too. But one simple message remains: get enough sleep when you can, wherever you can, and don’t worry too much about the occasional bad night.

Years before Dolly Parton‘s death at 80, the country songstress had already planned out what song she wanted to be played at her funeral.

Parton – whose nephew, Bryan Seaver, announced that she had died peacefully at her home in Nashville on Tuesday – weighed in on the subject way back in 2014 during an interview with Entertainment Weekly.

The singer–songwriter began by noting that the logical funeral song for her would be one of her own tunes, I Will Always Love You, which had achieved greater fame after Whitney Houston recorded it for her film The Bodyguard (1992).

Parton previously had a hit on the country charts with her original 1974 version of the song, which she wrote in response to the end of her working relationship with the country singer Porter Wagoner, who died in 2007.

She realized just how powerful her song could be when she attended Houston’s funeral in 2012.

‘I’m sure they’ll be playing I Will Always Love You when I die, just like they did with Whitney Houston,’ Parton said. ‘When they picked her coffin up and started in on that song, I started to cry, and I thought, “Oh my Lord.” That’s when it hit me that she was really gone.’

Parton assumed that her song I Will Always Love You would be played at her funeral, especially after she realized how powerful it could be when she heard Whitney Houston’s cover played at Houston’s funeral in 2012; Houston is pictured in 2001 in Las Vegas, Nevada

But as moving as I Will Always Love You could be, Parton imagined a different song for her funeral 12 years before her death.

‘There’s a song called If We Never Meet Again,’ Parton told EW. ‘It’s an old country–gospel church song that talks about if we never meet again this side of heaven, I will meet you on that beautiful shore.’

She was so moved by the thought of the beloved song, which was written by the Southern Gospel songwriter Albert E. Brumley, that she continued to quote its lyrics.

‘Where the charming roses bloom forever and where separations come no more,’ Parton added. 

She went on to reveal that the song figured prominently in her father Robert Parton Sr.’s funeral in 2000.

‘That was my daddy’s favorite,’ she went on to reveal. ‘We did sing it at his funeral, and I would like it to be sung at mine.’

Following the news of Parton’s death, her fans got a small bit of good news when it was confirmed that her Broadway dreams would still come true.

‘As was Dolly’s wish, the Broadway production of Dolly: A True Original Musical will begin previews December 7 at the St. James Theatre in New York City,’ the show’s producers said in a statement.

‘When they picked her coffin up and started in on that song, I started to cry, and I thought, “Oh my Lord.” That’s when it hit me that she was really gone,’ Parton said of hearing the song at Houston’s funeral; pictured in 2019 in Newport, Rhode Island

But Parton’s personal pick for her funeral was a different tune, an ‘old country–gospel church song’ titled If We Never Meet Again. She revealed the song was her father’s favorite and was played at his funeral in 2000; pictured in 2016 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Following the news of Parton’s death, her fans got a small bit of good news when it was confirmed that her Broadway dreams would still come true 

Advertisement

‘As was Dolly’s wish, the Broadway production of Dolly: A True Original Musical will begin previews December 7 at the St. James Theatre in New York City,’ producers said in a statement 

The hit show will then officially open January 19 on what would’ve been her 81st birthday following a sold-out run in her Nashville hometown last summer.

The country legend wrote the music and book and served as producer of the rags-to-riches show helmed by Tony-winning director Bartlett Sher and choreographed by Mandy Moore.

‘Now, this isn’t a story about sparkle and shine on the outside,’ Parton said in a video last month.

‘It’s about where I really come from, what I’ve lived, what I’ve lost, what I’ve loved and how I’ve found my way and told it in my own words and through the music that’s been part of me every step of the journey.’

The national treasure added: ‘Now, the musical has some of my big hits plus a lot of brand new songs that I’ve written just for the show. This really is a dream come true…and I can’t wait to share it with all of you!’

DOLLY will take audiences on a journey through the life of Parton ‘from her barefoot beginnings in the Smoky Mountains of East Tennessee to performing in platform heels under the bright lights of Hollywood.’

Katie Rose Clarke, Quinn Titcomb and Carrie St. Louis all portrayed the blonde bombshell at various stages of her life at the Belmont University Fisher Center for the Performing Arts, but the Broadway cast has yet to be announced.

However, parents should be aware that DOLLY might not be appropriate for children under age eight.

The hit show will then officially open January 19 on what would’ve been her 81st birthday following a sold-out run in her Nashville hometown last summer

The country legend wrote the music, book and served as producer of the rags-to-riches show helmed by Tony-winning director Bartlett Sher and choreographed by Mandy Moore 

Katie Rose Clarke, Quinn Titcomb and Carrie St. Louis (pictured August 8) all portrayed the Backwoods Barbie at various stages of her life at the Belmont University Fisher Center for the Performing Arts – but the Broadway cast has yet to be announced

Advertisement

It’s worth noting that Parton was only a Tony Award away from elite EGOT status.

The godmother of Miley Cyrus previously earned a Tony Award nomination for composing the music to Broadway production 9 to 5: The Musical which ran in 2009 at Manhattan’s Marquis Theatre.

Parton’s 1984 song With Bells On was also featured in the Broadway musical Candles, Snow & Mistletoe, which ran in 1993 at the Palace Theatre.

The Jean Hersholt Humanitarian Award winner had previously canceled her six-date residency, Dolly: Live in Las Vegas, at Caesars Palace’s Colosseum.

Parton admitted in May that she’s ‘always had problems with my kidney stones’ but for the past three years her immune system and digestive system ‘got all out of whack’ and now need to be ‘rebuilt and strengthened.’

‘The good news is I’m responding really well to meds and treatments and I’m improving every day,’ the Please Please Please singer said.

‘Now, the bad news is, it’s gonna take me a little while before I’m up to stage performance level because some of the meds and treatments make me a little bit “swimmy headed” as my grandma used to say.

‘And of course, I can’t be dizzy carrying around banjos, guitars and such on five-inch heels. And you know that I’m going to be wearing them!’

It’s worth noting that Parton was only a Tony Award away from elite EGOT status 

The Light of a Clear Blue Morning singer’s nephew Bryan Seaver broke the sad news via social media where he remarked on how she ‘ opened doors for generations of singers, songwriters, musicians and dreamers from every walk of life and across every continent’

Parton’s small, private funeral service will be held for immediate family and, in lieu of flowers, the family requested donations to Dolly Parton’s Imagination Library

Parton had admitted she still had ‘some healing to do’ but she has ‘great doctors,’ saying: ‘I’m doing really well and they assure me that everything I have is treatable, so I’m going with that.’

The Light of a Clear Blue Morning singer’s nephew Bryan Seaver broke the sad news via social media where he remarked on how she ‘ opened doors for generations of singers, songwriters, musicians and dreamers from every walk of life and across every continent.’

‘By her example, we believed that anything was possible. She never saw a door she couldn’t open, and the doors she opened made and changed history,’ her 75-year-old head of security said.

‘Dolly called me and said she wants to rest in a beautiful bed of plush cotton because after a life wearing heavy rhinestones, she finally deserves to be comfortable.’

Parton’s small, private funeral service will be held for immediate family and, in lieu of flowers, the family requested donations to Dolly Parton’s Imagination Library.

The backwoods Barbie – who still pulls 16.1 million monthly listeners on Spotify – sold over 100 million records and broke 10 Guinness World Records.

Parton was inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame in 2022 and the Country Music Hall of Fame in 1999.

For too long, climate communication has relied on the belief that if we stick with the science and communicate the evidence, action will follow. Scientific knowledge gives us the foundations for understanding possible futures, while speculation allows us to explore them. But poetry can bring that speculation to life, giving us a language to express what living through those futures might mean.

The power of poetry lies in making us pay attention to a sound, a place, an object or something changing around us. Researchers have argued that eco-poetry can influence how we experience a place, what we notice and what it might become in the future. They suggest that by “sounding” environmental change, speculative poetry offers us a tangible way to engage with, interpret and navigate the uncertainty of the climate crisis.

However, the literature professor Andrew Gorin has cautioned against making superficial claims that a poem will directly reduce carbon emissions or lead to greener policy. Its influence is much more nuanced, circulating ideas, offering different ways of seeing and contributing to how we respond to the world. There is also evidence for how poetry does this.

Psychology experts in the US and Canada argue that poetry evokes emotion partly through mental simulation. We imagine what the words describe, respond to rhythm and sound, and position ourselves within the poem. In one experiment that involved 27 German-speaking participants, researchers used psychophysiology (the study of how thoughts and emotions link to physical responses in the human body), brain imaging and behavioural responses to show that recited poetry could produce a range of responses from chills to goosebumps.

In my own ongoing doctoral research, school leaders engaged with the process of writing speculative poems, exploring their hopes, worries and uncertainties about climate change. Poetry has enabled them to engage with experiences that are complex, interconnected and difficult to put into words.

Their speculative poems bring knowledge, experience, place, memory, emotion and uncertainty together, enabling school leaders to consider what might be demanded of their leadership as climate change increasingly affects their schools, communities, children and young people.

À lire aussi :
Introducing The Conversation Climate Poetry Award – for UK and Ireland-based academics

How to be a poet

So how can we all reap the benefits of climate poetry? To start writing speculative climate poetry, try jumping ten years ahead. Choose something completely ordinary: your commute, your lunch, your garden or a trip to the shops. What might have changed in ten years because of climate change?

Experiment with epic and lyric. Write about the same climate future in two different ways. Epic poetry tells a larger story, often involving journeys, struggles and transformation, while lyric poetry focuses more closely on a particular experience, feeling, relationship, place or moment.

Think about The Odyssey for epic poetry, and write a journey across time and place influenced by unpredictable events, struggle and transformation. Then try lyric poetry. Take inspiration from Emily Dickinson’s I’m Nobody! Who are you? and focus closely on a particular experience, relationship, place or moment. What does each form allow you to notice and express differently?

Sound out the future. Walk somewhere familiar and notice what you can hear, smell, see and feel. Use walking, listening and writing to look more deeply at what’s happening around us. Now imagine the same place ten years from now. What might stay the same, disappear or change?

Start with an ordinary object: an umbrella, a tree or a bottle of water. Imagine its place in a climate-changed future.

Explore the emotional power of poetry. Let your voice lead the writing. Talk aloud about a climate-changed future, a place you care about, or something you fear losing. Record yourself and listen back. Notice the words and phrases that make you pause, feel uncomfortable or give you hope, then use them to build your poem.

Often, writing a poem can seem intimidating if you’re aiming for perfection. Instead, simply begin with what you notice. Bring together the ideas, feelings and possibilities that matter to you and let them become a poetic speculation about how to create a better future together.

In this fifth part in our series on how the UK has changed in the past 25 years, we look at crime, education, transport, energy and the environment.

Crime and policing

Graham Farrell, professor of crime science, University of Leeds

Toby Davies, associate professor in criminal justice data analytics, University of Leeds

Contrary to many media headlines, the story of crime over the last quarter century is positive. The dominant trend is the long-term decline in property and violent crime.

In the 1990s, property and violence rates were around ten times what they are now. The reason for their decline is a rising tide of security improvements that has reduced crime opportunities – everything from engine immobilisers in cars, to double glazing and deadbolts in houses, to dual-factor authentication for payments and other services.

How has the UK changed since the start of the century? From Blair to Burnham, from the dotcom era to AI agents, time has certainly not stood still. In this six-part series, a team of some 35 experts look at everything from defence spending to species populations to the rise of populism to try and make sense of the intervening years.

Not only have these discouraged theft, they have discouraged the violent crimes that go hand-in-hand. Bank and Post Office robberies, for example, are largely a thing of the past. And unable to get involved in easy property crimes, young people did not progress to violence.

Trends in violence, burglary and vehicle theft

Violence against women and girls, including domestic violence, has fallen by around two-thirds in the last quarter century – albeit it’s still unacceptably high. Though further research is required to confirm it, domestic violence appears more likely to be by men who committed other crimes in their youth. If so, it may be that when they can’t commit those earlier crimes, they are less violent in relationships when they are older.

Crime online

There have also been new and emerging types of crime, particularly internet-related offences. We know these are independent of the declines in other property crimes and violence, for three reasons.

There was a decade or more between the start of the “crime drop” in the early 1990s and the main increase in cybercrimes. This means it’s different cohorts of offenders, since most offenders are young. The skills and resources needed for cybercrime are also very different to those for burglary, car theft and other similar crimes. And cybercrime offenders are not necessarily even located in the same country.

But even the cybercrime picture may not be as bad as often portrayed. Crime Survey of England and Wales estimates of household fraud and computer misuse are available from 2016-17 onwards, and the trend has been relatively flat over the last decade (the chart below does exclude a pandemic-related uptick which subsided).

Household fraud and computer misuse estimates

You may be wondering why cybercrime hasn’t benefited from the same falls in crime opportunity structure (how easy crime is to commit) that have reduced property and violent crime. It’s true that online security measures are effective against some forms of offending, but rapid technological developments constantly create new opportunities for innovation by criminals. We’re still playing catch up as these crimes evolve, but with persistence we should be able to prevent them too.

There’s a similar explanation for another seeming anomaly: phone theft. It has increased because phones proliferated this century and make near-perfect theft targets. Crime science refers to such targets as CRAVED: they are concealable, removable, available, valuable, enjoyable and disposable (meaning easily re-sold). This explains why your phone rather than your fridge is stolen even when they cost the same.

Knife crime

Knife crime increases in the 2010s are one other counter-trend that still needs to be properly explained. But such crimes would not be possible without the widespread availability of knives, both online and in supermarkets.

Most households have lots of pointed knives in the kitchen, making them easy to grab during an argument. And with so many similar knives in the drawer, nobody notices if one goes missing. It is the pointed tip of kitchen knives that punctures major organs and arteries, potentially meaning a fight becomes a murder.

We have argued for removing pointed kitchen knives from general circulation, which is the only intervention likely to achieve the 50% reduction in knife crime to which the current government aspires. In case you didn’t notice, table knives are already round-tipped, so it is a small step to make kitchen knives safer too.

At the same time, and counterintuitively, the UK’s knife crime headlines are evidence of success in some forms of crime prevention. Consider that it is high-profile only because our gun and bomb control policies are so effective.

In 2022-23 the per capita rate of gun-related homicide in the United States was over 100 times that in the UK – or, put another way, UK gun control was 99% effective in comparison. And the prevented UK crime and homicide did not shift to knives or other crimes; there are dramatically fewer overall.

Likewise, of the few terrorist attacks that occur in the UK, they disproportionately involve knives. These attacks would be more numerous and far worse without the raft of gun and bomb control measures. Weapon control works, in other words.

This brings us to broader crime policy. More funds for policing won’t have much effect on crime. Since the long-term crime declines were due to private and public sector measures by agents other than the police, our police and government should be more focused on encouraging the private sector to take responsibility for the crime opportunities it “emits”. The phone industry, for instance, could have been incentivised decades ago to disable stolen phones, so a recent call to action by the Metropolitan police is very welcome.

Education

Helena Gillespie, professor of learning and teaching in higher education, University of East Anglia

In 1996 Tony Blair made a speech promising that his three priorities in government would be “education, education, education”. He believed education was the engine of economic growth, and by the end of his first term in 2001, Labour had invested significantly in school infrastructure. Many schools had new and refreshed premises, fit for a 21st-century education.

This could have provided a unique foundation for schooling at the turn of the millennium, but 25 years and 22 secretaries of state for education later, the reality is somewhat different.

There is much that remains constant in schools. The system of primary and secondary education still means that most pupils move at the same rate through their education. Classrooms, desks, science labs and football fields still look very similar to 25 years ago. However, education is devolved to the nations, which has led to different curricula, approaches to qualifications and inspection regimes across the UK.

Schools in England remain heavily influenced by what is known as a national approach to testing. This refers to standardised exams designed, mandated and marked centrally, as opposed to tests created individually by teachers or schools.

For instance, teaching in the later years of primary education in England is heavily influenced by the SATs (standard assessment tests) that pupils take at the end of primary, since the data is used in the school inspection regime. By contrast in Wales, comparable data on school performance is seen as less important than a school’s own assessment of its success. This gives teachers more flexibility in how and what they teach.

England’s approach owes much to Michael Gove, who has been the longest serving education secretary in the past 25 years (from 2010-14). He introduced the revised curriculum for English schools, which moved away from teaching skills toward core facts, rote learning and more emphasis on academic subjects like history, science and maths.

He oversaw significant expansion of academies, where schools cut ties with their local education authorities. In theory this gives them greater financial autonomy, and nearly 90% of secondaries now have this status. However, economies of scale have led to 92% of academies joining multi-academy trusts, which may have limited their financial freedom in the medium term.

Becoming an academy also, in theory, gave schools more autonomy over the use of the revised curriculum. But since Gove also did away with testing through coursework and modules at GCSE level and introduced mandatory high-stakes GCSE exams, schools effectively had less flexibility than it appeared.

The Scottish dimension

In the political turmoil that followed the Brexit vote in 2016, education took a political back seat, with four different education secretaries in Westminster in four years. Meanwhile Scottish education policy, whose skills-focused curriculum for excellence already made it quite different from Gove’s approach, further shifted in 2017 with a review of education and governance. It focused on the need to improve outcomes for the most disadvantaged children, and gave headteachers a bit more say in spending money to help drive attainment.

Many UK education secretaries have espoused the virtues of technical and vocational education, for example the Skills for Jobs white paper published in 2021. Yet such initiatives have failed to back their aspirations with meaningful investment in further education colleges, which should be the principal drivers of vocational education.

Meanwhile in higher education, introducing fees in England and Wales made it possible for universities to teach many more young people – participation rates rose from 40% in 2001-02 to 51% by 2023-24. However, it has also saddled graduates with very significant debt, particularly in England. Across the UK, the sector also remains plagued by questions of value for money and soaring institutional debt.

The big picture

In terms of results, changes to policy and grading approaches makes a longitudinal comparison difficult, but the overall picture in terms of GCSE (year 10) attainment in England has been stable since 2013.

Yet the biggest challenge to education in the last 25 years came not from a politician, or devolution, or policy change. It came in March 2020 when the COVID pandemic lead to the widespread sporadic closure of schools for two years. In the aftermath of the pandemic there was a failure of government efforts to support educational recovery which still resonates in the education system today.

Absenteeism spiked during the pandemic and hasn’t really come down (it was about 5% in 2019 and around 7% today). Attainment levels between richer and poorer children worsened after years of improvement, and has largely not reversed. And a recent government report showed that levels of both diagnosed mental health conditions and psychological distress are rising among young people, having deteriorated during the pandemic (to some extent this may be because there’s less stigma around reporting these conditions than in the past).

There also remains a significant challenge around low engagement in education, with as many as one in eight of young people not in education, employment or training. As a measure of the success of the UK’s education system, that last statistic, perhaps more than any other, suggests a system which, over the last 25 years of change, has failed to keep up with the needs of young people.

Transport

Stephen Potter, emeritus professor of transport strategy, Open University

The period 1975-2000 saw little substantive change. Catalytic converters cut air pollution, but the rise in car use and road congestion was relentless, coupled with the introduction of a few city tram systems and the Channel tunnel.

Up to 2001 the amount we travelled steadily increased, but then this trend reversed. In 2002 the average annual distance travelled per person was 7,193 miles; by 2024 it had dropped to 6,082 miles.

Advertisement

Why we travel has also shifted. Commuting trips declined by 39% over the period, and now account for only 12% of journeys. Trips to visit people dropped by 39%, while leisure trips increased substantially. The rise of digital communications, remote working and online shopping might explain much of these trends, but other socioeconomic factors are involved, such as our ageing population, young people drawn to city life, and an increase in economically inactive people.

The tech shift

Electric vehicles are an obvious example of technological change this century. In 1999, for a BBC Open University programme, I experienced the first hybrid Prius in the UK. Spurred by the climate agenda, battery electric vehicles today make up 27% of sales, plug-in hybrids 14% and other hybrids 13%, so more than half of all car sales are now electrified vehicles.

Sat-nav, a niche car feature in 2001, has become ubiquitous, vital for both personal travel and business systems. We are now moving on from digital driver assistance towards driverless autonomous vehicles.

Driverless taxis are due to appear on British streets soon; they certainly have their faults, but the technology is improving rapidly and heading mainstream. On a smaller scale robotic vehicles are already here, with several UK cities including Milton Keynes and Bristol having experimented with autonomous robotic food deliveries.

The appearance and popularity of e-bikes and e-scooters divides opinion, but they help fill a hole where conventional public transport services fail. Outside of big cities, local public transport is in crisis with bus trips declining by 39% from 2002-2024. In the last ten years, over a quarter of bus routes have been cut. In contrast, rail use has increased this century by over 50%.

Some new forms of public transport are beginning to appear. Demand responsive transport, booked roughly like a cab or Uber but sharing trips with other passengers, has appeared in some places, notably urban fringes and rural areas. Wales has been a frontrunner here.

Of potentially large significance is the emergence of the “trackless tram”. Instead of spending years and vast sums digging up roads to install rails and overhead power lines, this innovative battery-powered design is steered by GPS and cameras. They have been running in China for several years and places like Hertfordshire and Milton Keynes are actively working to introduce such systems.

How will all this work out in the future? As in other areas of life, in transport the shift from analogue to AI and digital futures could play out in a wide range of ways – some life affirming and environmentally positive, and others dystopian. We may now be in the crucial innovation stage of determining which of these paths will be followed.

Energy

Jim Watson, professor of energy policy, University College London

Back in 2001, three-quarters of our electricity was generated by fossil fuels, and electric vehicles were a distant dream. The energy transition, as it is now called, was well ahead of us.

However, the forces that have shaped our energy system over the last 25 years were starting to become visible. Climate change had been put firmly on the UK policy agenda in 2000 by the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution. The commission’s report, Energy: The Changing Climate, recommended a long-term target for reducing UK emissions for the first time. In 2003, that recommendation was accepted by the government after an extensive review of energy policy, and the UK adopted a 60% reduction target for greenhouse gas emissions by 2050.

Looking back, that target seems very unambitious. UK greenhouse gas emissions are now 50% lower than 1990 levels. They had already fallen steadily in the 1990s, largely due to a switch from coal to gas electricity generation. That trend subsequently accelerated from the late 2000s as policies to support renewables became more effective – and due to falls in emissions from road transport, domestic buildings and industry.

UK carbon emissions

Advertisement

The share of electricity from renewables grew from just 3% of the UK’s power in 2000 to 53% in 2025. The current level of generation from wind and solar would have astonished power system engineers in 2001. Back then, there were serious debates about whether more than 10% of our power could be generated from these technologies.

This rapid progress with emissions increased confidence that radical change could be achieved. It eventually led to the adoption of a legally binding net-zero emissions target in 2019, backed by a cross-party political consensus.

New uncertainty

That consensus has now started to break down, partly due to rapid increases in energy prices and increasing concern about energy security. The last five years have demonstrated how geopolitical events such as the Ukraine and Iran wars can still have a profound impact on UK energy prices. While fossil fuels now generate only a third of UK electricity, gas prices still set electricity prices most of the time. We still use oil and gas extensively, especially for transport and heating.

Advertisement

Energy security is not a new concern, of course. When Prime Minister Tony Blair launched his second review of energy policy in 2006, this was also due to a rise in international fossil fuel prices. Two decades of low international prices had come to an end, and the UK had become a net importer of energy due to declining production in the North Sea.

A key outcome of that review was support for new nuclear power stations. Implementation is taking a very long time. The first new nuclear station is still under construction at Hinkley Point, south-west England, with an expected start date of 2031.

It is now much more likely than it was in 2001 that the UK’s energy system will make a decisive shift away from fossil fuels. The past 25 years have shown that rapid change is possible, and that government policies can act as a key driver of this change. Non-fossil technologies such as renewables, battery storage and electric vehicles are now much cheaper and more widely available. The remaining challenge is to build on the progress that has been made – and to insulate the UK from fossil fuel price shocks for good.

Environment

Hayley Fowler, professor of climate change impacts, Newcastle University

When the 2001 census was taken, climate change was already well understood by scientists, but to most people in Britain it still felt like a distant issue. Twenty-five years later, it has become part of the country’s lived environment. Britain is warmer, wetter in winter, more exposed to heatwaves and flooding, and facing rising pressure on coasts, rivers, water supplies and nature.

The clearest change is temperature. The UK’s warmest years have clustered overwhelmingly in the 21st century. Heat that once seemed exceptional is now less surprising, including the record breaking 35°C and 37°C temperatures of May and June 2026 respectively. The most striking example came in July 2022, when the UK exceeded 40° for the first time. This was more than a symbolic record: it showed that Britain’s buildings, transport systems, schools, hospitals and care homes were designed for a climate that no longer exists.

Extreme heat has changed the way climate risk is understood. In the past, British weather hazards were often associated with cold, storms and rain. Those risks have not disappeared, but heat is now a major public-health concern.

Rainfall has changed too. Britain has always had variable weather, but recent decades show a shift towards wetter winters and heavier rainfall events. The winter half-year from October 2023 to March 2024 was the wettest on record for England and Wales. Heavier rain increases the risk of river flooding, surface-water flooding and sewer flooding, especially in towns and cities where drainage systems struggle during intense downpours.

The main risks

These shifts mean that Britain faces greater risk from droughts, water stress and floods. The Climate Change Committee’s A Well-Adapted UK report (2026) identifies both flooding and drought – as well as heat – as central risks for the decades ahead, warning that the country is not yet adapting fast enough.

This dual risk can seem contradictory, but a warmer climate can intensify both wet and dry extremes. Hotter summers dry soils, increase evaporation and raise demand for water. This matters for households, farming, rivers, wetlands and energy production. Water companies, regulators and governments are now under pressure not only to reduce leakage and pollution, but also to plan for more severe dry periods by building new storage.

Sea levels have also risen around the UK by upwards of 10cm this century, increasing the risk of coastal flooding and erosion. Higher seas make storm surges and high tides more damaging, placing added pressure on coastal towns, ports, roads, railways and natural habitats. For some communities, adaptation may mean stronger defences; for others, it may eventually mean difficult decisions about managed retreat.

Advertisement

Other environmental changes since 2001 are not only about climate. Air quality has improved in some respects, especially as coal power has almost disappeared and vehicle standards have tightened, though pollution remains a serious urban health issue through things like particulates and nitrogen dioxide from vehicle exhausts. Britain has also experienced continuing biodiversity decline, with pressure on birds, insects, rivers and habitats. Public concern about sewage pollution, river health and the condition of nature has grown sharply.

In parallel to all this, we’ve seen a major policy shift. In 2001 decarbonisation was still a relatively specialist policy debate. Since then, the UK has adopted legally binding carbon budgets and a net-zero target. Electricity generation has changed dramatically, with coal largely replaced by gas, renewables and imports. But emissions from homes, transport, food and land use remain harder to cut.

Nature and conservation

Helen Roy, professor in ecology, University of Exeter

Over the last 25 years there has been increasing pressure on our natural world from the five main drivers of biodiversity loss: climate change, land and sea use change, pollution, over-exploitation of natural resources and invasive non-native species. People are observing the changes for themselves – seeing new species arriving and habitats fragmented by the likes of new buildings and roads.

In 2004 the invasive non-native harlequin ladybird, Harmonia axyridis, was first detected in the UK. Now ladybird communities in towns and cities are dominated by this species. The harlequin ladybird is one of more then 2,000 non-native species in the UK – other recent arrivals include the yellow-legged hornet and box-tree moth. There is robust evidence of adverse impacts on people and nature for about 10% of all non-native species, and the actual proportion is likely higher, though that still means a large number are harmless.

Some invasive non-native species are known to benefit from disturbed and degraded habitats, while climate change is providing conditions in the UK for some to flourish – giant hogweed and water primrose benefit from both, for instance. Biodiversity scientists are increasingly turning their attention to the ways in which drivers are interacting in these ways and consequences for ecosystems globally.

The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF), agreed at the Convention on Biological Diversity Conference of the Parties 2021-22, outlines ambitious targets for countries to address the drivers and reverse declines in biodiversity. While these targets may seem far removed from local communities, there are many ways in which people across the UK can make a difference, from digging garden ponds to avoiding synthetic pesticides.

The awareness boom

It has been encouraging to see a growing awareness among the general public about the plight of our natural world in recent decades. More people are talking about the issues facing biodiversity and thinking about ways in which they can help.

The number of people engaging with environmental citizen science projects has vastly increased, through apps such as iRecord, Big Butterfly Count and the UK Pollinator Monitoring Scheme Flower-Insect Timed Counts. We’re seeing artificial intelligence enhancing some of these apps – it’s assisting people with species identification on iRecord, for instance.

Equally, it’s inspiring to see the contributions of people across the UK to biological recording schemes, such as the UK Ladybird Survey. The large-scale and long-term biodiversity datasets derived from these activities are invaluable for tracking progress by the UK towards the GBF targets.

I also feel that there is greater understanding of some of the specific issues that the natural world is facing. The critical role of pollinating insects seems to be more widely recognised.

Gardening for wildlife seems to be increasing in popularity. Every year there seems to be more people engaging with campaigns such as No Mow May, which was recently extended into Let it Bloom June, to provide vital floral resources for insects through the summer months. These “nature positive” actions are people positive too. There is increasing evidence of the wellbeing benefits to people of connecting with nature.

There are many conservation success stories from the last 25 years that give me cause for optimism about the fate of our natural world. All of them involve the engagement of local communities and partnerships: seeing seabirds thrive on St Agnes, Isles of Scilly, thanks to a recovery project following the island-wide removal of rats; visiting nature reserves such as Daneway Banks, Gloucestershire where large blue butterflies are resident once again; promoting biosecurity campaigns such as Be Plant Wise and Check Clean Dry.

My hope is that there will be much to celebrate in another 25 years if everyone prioritises actions to nurture our natural world. While there is no doubt that we have been the cause of widespread losses in biodiversity over many decades, we are also the solution to a flourishing future for people and nature everywhere.

The Insights section is committed to high-quality longform journalism. Our editors work with academics from many different backgrounds who are tackling a wide range of societal and scientific challenges.