The Cardano Foundation and Brazilian technology company Blockforce announced on Aug. 31 that Cardano now operates as the public verification layer for an enterprise supply chain platform.

The system has anchored cryptographic proofs for more than 500,000 records, according to the partners’ announcement. It is already operating with major Brazilian fashion companies, including Azzas 2154.

The companies described the deployment as a dual-ledger architecture. Commercial records remain on a restricted network, while corresponding proofs are recorded on Cardano’s public blockchain.

Cardano separates confidential records from public proof

Blockforce stores information about individual supply chain events on a permissioned network. Access remains limited to approved companies, suppliers and other participating parties.

The platform then generates a cryptographic proof for each record and anchors that proof to Cardano. An auditor or regulator can compare a supplied record against its public proof to establish whether the record has changed since anchoring.

This design seeks to resolve a common problem in enterprise blockchain deployments. Companies may need independent verification but cannot publish supplier identities, prices, contracts or other commercially sensitive information on a public ledger.

The architecture does not establish whether the information entered into the private system was accurate. It provides evidence that a particular record existed and has not subsequently been altered. Data quality still depends on source documents, validation procedures and participating organizations.

Azzas 2154 applies the system to leather traceability

Azzas 2154, described by the partners as Latin America’s largest fashion group, is using the platform across its leather supply chain. The company combines fiscal documents, supplier information and official public databases to create an auditable product history.

The fashion group has set a target of tracing 100% of the leather used across its brands by 2030. That remains a future corporate goal rather than a completed result.

European supply chain requirements provide a commercial reason for exporters to improve product records. The European Union’s Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation is establishing Digital Product Passports for priority product categories, including textiles and apparel.

The European Commission expects those passports to store and share information about products’ sustainability and environmental characteristics. The Cardano-Blockforce system could support record verification, but neither company said that using the platform automatically satisfies any particular European regulation.

In related coverage, crypto.news reported that Volvo tested blockchain infrastructure for supplier transactions, component traceability and compliance records. Volvo’s experiment used a closed environment, while Blockforce combines a restricted network with public Cardano proofs.

Batching reduced Cardano anchoring costs by 92%

Publishing an individual blockchain transaction for every supply chain event can become expensive at enterprise volumes. The Cardano Foundation and Blockforce said their engineering work reduced the public anchoring cost per record by 92%.

The partners achieved the reduction by batching certificates before anchoring them to Cardano. Their published architecture uses Blockforce’s uVerify system and configurable batching parameters to combine multiple records into fewer public transactions.

The 92% figure comes from the project partners and has not been supported by a publicly disclosed independent audit. The announcement also did not provide the original cost, the resulting cost per certificate or the network conditions used for the comparison.

Even so, the reported 500,000-record deployment moves the project beyond a limited prototype. It provides an operating example of a hybrid design intended to preserve confidential business data while using a public blockchain as a shared verification layer.

Contracts target 6.5 million records through 2030

The two companies said signed contracts cover 6.5 million certified records through 2030. That figure represents contracted future activity, not records already processed. The confirmed production total currently exceeds 500,000.

Blockforce plans to apply the architecture beyond fashion. The partners identified automotive manufacturing, agribusiness, pharmaceuticals and cosmetics as possible expansion areas. They did not disclose additional customers or deployment dates.

Execution will depend on companies supplying consistent source data and integrating existing documentation systems with the permissioned network. Auditors and regulators must also receive suitable tools for retrieving records and comparing them with Cardano proofs.

Public transaction identifiers, a verification dashboard or an independent system audit would provide more evidence about throughput, costs and reliability as deployment grows. The next measurable milestone will be progress from the current 500,000 records toward the contracted 6.5 million total.

Ethereum price remained trapped between $2,400 support and $2,500 resistance on Sept. 1, with weak trend strength and fading momentum raising the risk of another liquidity-driven pullback.

According to data from crypto.news, Ethereum (ETH) price was trading near $2,460 at press time, little changed over the previous 24 hours and down about 1% over the past week. The token had retreated from an Aug. 27 high near $2,564 after buyers failed to extend its late-August breakout.

Trading activity has also cooled. CoinGecko data showed that Ethereum’s 24-hour volume had fallen by about 21% to approximately $11.35 billion, indicating lower participation as the price consolidated.

ETH remains caught between support around $2,400 and resistance extending from $2,500 to $2,565. A break from that range could determine whether the August rally resumes or gives way to a deeper correction.

Ethereum price loses momentum below $2,500

The daily chart shows Ethereum consolidating near the upper end of the advance from its June low of $1,515 to the August high of $2,565.

ETH remains above the 78.6% Fibonacci retracement level at $2,340, which now serves as the main higher-timeframe support. Holding above that level would preserve most of the structure created by the August breakout.

However, momentum has weakened considerably. The daily moving average convergence divergence indicator is close to producing a bearish crossover. The MACD line stands at 143.58, only slightly above the signal line at 143.46, while its histogram has narrowed to almost zero.

Bull-bear power remains positive at 151.75, suggesting buyers have not lost full control. Its bars have nevertheless declined since the initial breakout, showing that bullish pressure is fading as ETH struggles to clear $2,500.

A daily close above $2,565 would invalidate the short-term consolidation and open a path toward $2,600. Continued rejection beneath that area would leave $2,340 exposed, followed by the 61.8% Fibonacci level at $2,164.

4-hour indicators point to range-bound trading

Ethereum’s 4-hour chart provides a more neutral outlook. ETH is trading almost directly on the Bollinger Bands’ middle line at $2,456.53, reflecting a balance between buyers and sellers.

The upper band sits at $2,497.62, making $2,500 the first resistance that bulls must reclaim. The lower band at $2,415.44 aligns with the broader $2,400 support area.

The bands have narrowed after expanding sharply during the Aug. 20 breakout. Such compression often precedes a larger move, although it does not indicate which direction the price will take.

The average directional index has fallen to 18.58 from above 60 following the rally. An ADX reading below 20 generally signals that the market lacks a strong directional trend, supporting the case for continued consolidation until ETH moves outside the Bollinger Bands.

Crypto trader Daan Crypto Trades said ETH was trading in a tight area between its weekly 200-day simple and exponential moving averages and a horizontal price level.

The analyst identified $2,400 and $2,500 as the levels to monitor on daily closes, noting that Ethereum has spent roughly 11 days between them. Under that setup, a sustained close above $2,500 would favor buyers, while a loss of $2,400 would weaken the breakout structure.

Liquidation clusters surround Ethereum price

CoinGlass’s one-week liquidation heatmap shows leveraged positions building on both sides of Ethereum’s current price.

The largest nearby overhead concentration appears between approximately $2,540 and $2,550. A move into that area could force short positions to close, potentially accelerating an upside test of the $2,565 August high.

Additional liquidity rests around $2,495 to $2,505, reinforcing $2,500 as the first barrier.

On the downside, notable clusters appear around $2,420 to $2,410, followed by another concentration close to $2,390. A break below $2,400 could therefore trigger long liquidations and pull ETH toward the lower liquidity zone.

Liquidation maps identify areas where leveraged positions may be forced to close, but they do not guarantee that the price will reach those levels.

Trader Gerla compared Ethereum’s current position with a former support zone that became resistance during the previous market cycle. The analyst said a repeat of that structure could produce more range trading and a sweep toward $1,900–$2,000 before a larger advance.

The comparison represents a long-term scenario rather than a confirmed target. ETH must first lose $2,340 and $2,164 before the $2,000 area becomes a more immediate technical risk.

US Ethereum ETF inflows offer support

Demand through regulated US investment products remains a counterweight to the weak price momentum.

US spot Ethereum ETFs recorded $87.68 million in combined net inflows on Aug. 31, according to SoSoValue data. The session reportedly extended its positive flow streak to 11 trading days.

BlackRock’s iShares Ethereum Trust led the daily total with approximately $59.94 million, while the Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust added about $13.50 million. The products collectively held approximately $15.61 billion in net assets, equal to 5.23% of Ethereum’s market capitalization.

Persistent ETF inflows suggest US investors are adding exposure despite Ethereum’s failure to move above $2,500. However, price confirmation remains absent while trading volume declines and momentum indicators flatten.

Ethereum’s next directional signal will likely come from a daily close outside the $2,400–$2,500 range. A close above the upper boundary would bring $2,550–$2,565 into focus, while a loss of $2,400 would expose $2,340 and increase the risk of a broader retracement.

The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has moved to revisit a key element of its stablecoin regime, proposing changes that would allow some stablecoins connected to multiple jurisdictions to fall under Singapore’s regulatory framework. The development arrives through a new public consultation on amendments to the Payment Services Act (PSA) and associated policy adjustments.

In a consultation opened Tuesday, MAS said it is considering a pathway for “jointly issued” stablecoins—issued by a Singapore entity together with a foreign issuer—to qualify as “MAS-regulated stablecoins” if risks are adequately addressed. The regulator is also exploring whether a limited number of foreign-issued stablecoins could be recognized under similar overseas rules, particularly for cross-border wholesale usage.

Key takeaways

• MAS is consulting on PSA amendments to implement its stablecoin framework and reflect policy developments since 2023.
• Jointly issued stablecoins (Singapore + foreign issuer) could qualify as “MAS-regulated stablecoins” if MAS-set risk conditions are met.
• MAS is considering recognition of a limited set of foreign-issued stablecoins subject to comparable regulatory frameworks abroad.
• Proposals would tighten issuer safeguards, including reserve stability expectations, disclosure requirements, and stress-testing.
• MAS says comments are open until Oct. 16.

Why MAS is rethinking its earlier single-jurisdiction stance

MAS’s 2023 position required qualifying stablecoins to be issued solely in Singapore. MAS then finalized a framework for single-currency stablecoins issued in Singapore and pegged to the Singapore dollar or a G10 currency, under which issuers would operate with specified regulatory controls. According to MAS, the regulator’s earlier approach reflected concerns around whether equivalent regulation and effective cooperation could be secured across jurisdictions.

MAS also highlighted operational and technical issues it said would be difficult under a multi-jurisdiction model—such as establishing where commingled stablecoin reserves originated, and whether those reserves would be sufficient to meet redemption requests in practice.

The new consultation signals a shift from that restrictive baseline. While MAS did not abandon the need for risk controls, it is now proposing mechanisms meant to address those earlier concerns in cases where issuance involves both Singapore and a foreign issuer.

MAS consultation: how “MAS-regulated stablecoins” could work

At the heart of the proposal is an expanded eligibility route within the existing stablecoin framework. MAS said stablecoins jointly issued by a Singapore issuer and a foreign issuer could be regulated under the framework and marketed with the “MAS-regulated stablecoins” label, provided that associated risks are sufficiently mitigated.

MAS is pursuing legislative implementation of its approach by proposing amendments to the PSA, the main law in Singapore governing payment services and payment-service operators. The consultation outlines requirements intended to preserve the same core features of the 2023 framework, including reserve-backed value stability and controls around redemption and disclosures.

Under the proposal, only issuers licensed under the framework would be permitted to market themselves as “MAS-regulated stablecoin” issuers and use the “MAS-regulated stablecoins” designation. Outside of the dedicated framework, MAS indicated that stablecoins would continue to be treated under existing rules as digital payment tokens.

Issuer safeguards MAS wants to add or strengthen

The consultation does not limit itself to eligibility criteria. MAS is also looking to reinforce how compliant issuers must manage reserves, customer protections, and stress resilience.

MAS’s proposal would include requirements relating to reserve-backed stability, capital considerations, redemption “at par,” and issuer disclosures. It also proposes prohibitions and additional operational obligations, including a ban on issuers paying interest on regulated stablecoins.

To test survivability under adverse scenarios, MAS is also proposing that issuers conduct stress tests and maintain recovery and orderly wind-down plans. In addition, the consultation outlines consumer-facing safeguards requiring issuers to protect customer money received before the corresponding stablecoins are issued.

For market participants, these safeguards matter because they define the compliance boundaries for who can access the “MAS-regulated” label—an important distinction in a jurisdiction where regulation can influence banking relationships, distribution, and institutional onboarding.

Recognition of selected foreign-issued stablecoins for wholesale use

Beyond jointly issued products, MAS is considering another pathway: recognizing a limited number of foreign-issued stablecoins regulated under comparable overseas frameworks. MAS’s stated rationale is tied to utility in cross-border wholesale transactions, where certain stablecoins may be used as settlement or liquidity tools between professional counterparties.

The proposal stops short of opening the door broadly to all foreign stablecoins. MAS frames the idea as a controlled recognition approach limited to a small number of eligible instruments, contingent on regulatory comparability and risk mitigation—consistent with how it treated equivalence and cooperation as a key challenge in 2023.

For traders and treasury teams, this distinction could be meaningful. Wholesale settlement use typically prioritizes predictable redeemability, clear governance, and operational certainty—areas where MAS’s emphasis on redemption at par, reserve-backed stability, and stress planning are directly relevant.

What to watch during the consultation period

MAS is accepting public feedback on the proposals until Oct. 16. Market participants will likely focus on how MAS plans to operationalize “sufficiently mitigated” risk in joint issuance structures and what specific criteria may govern recognition of any foreign-issued stablecoins. The outcome could determine whether Singapore’s stablecoin framework becomes more interoperable across borders—or remains largely centered on domestic issuance.

For readers who want to review the regulatory text directly, MAS’s consultation is published here: https://www.mas.gov.sg/publications/consultations/2026/consultation-on-proposed-amendments-to-the-payment-services-act-for-stablecoin-regulation. MAS previously finalized its 2023 stablecoin framework here: https://www.mas.gov.sg/news/media-releases/2023/mas-finalises-stablecoin-regulatory-framework.

The London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG) is reportedly preparing to bring tokenized stock trading to its next-generation venue in partnership with Kraken’s parent company, Payward. The plan, described by Payward’s chief commercial officer Mark Greenberg in a Tuesday report, targets access to tokenized stocks that track major UK equity products starting in 2027.

According to the Financial Times, the tokenized equities would be listed on LSE’s new night-time trading platform, LSE 24—an initiative designed to run 24/5 trading from Mondays through Fridays. LSE 24 was announced by the exchange operator on July 21.

Key takeaways

• LSEG is moving tokenized equity exposure into a regulated trading venue, with Payward linked to the rollout.
• The targeted launch window for tokenized stocks tracking leading UK equities is 2027.
• Trading would take place on LSE’s planned 24/5 system (LSE 24), aimed at extending market hours versus traditional schedules.
• The announcement places London among several major TradFi firms pursuing tokenized stock products, including Nasdaq and ICE.
• Tokenized stock adoption continues to expand, with onchain totals and holder counts rising as measured by RWA.xyz.

How LSE 24 and Payward could change UK market access

LSE 24 is central to the move. Rather than limiting tokenized assets to a separate experimental platform, the approach described by Payward connects tokenized stocks to a trading venue being built by the London exchange itself. The claimed operating schedule—24/5—matters for investors and trading desks that want greater continuity across the week, particularly around regional evening hours and the transition from Asia to Europe.

For issuers and liquidity providers, tokenization can also shift how equity exposure is distributed and held, including the possibility of fractional ownership depending on the product structure. However, what exactly will be offered—such as which specific UK equity products are covered and how settlement and custody will operate in practice—was not detailed in the excerpted reporting.

Still, the direction is clear: tokenized stocks are being treated less like a standalone blockchain concept and more like an extension of mainstream market infrastructure.

LSE joins a broader tokenized equities race in TradFi

LSE’s reported partnership with Kraken’s parent Payward adds another traditional exchange operator to a trend that has accelerated across major markets. The article notes that other established players are also exploring tokenized equity offerings that can be traded around the clock or with extended hours.

In the United States, Nasdaq agreed to acquire LeveL Markets in August, framing the deal as part of a broader push into tokenized markets with round-the-clock trading capabilities. In Europe, ICE—the parent of the New York Stock Exchange—has also been linked to bringing tokenized stocks to its platform as part of a wider tokenized securities initiative.

Meanwhile, Deutsche Börse has reportedly invested in Payward, citing plans to broaden access to blockchain-based securities and tokenized investment products. Those efforts build on a prior relationship involving Kraken and Payward.

Beyond spot equities, the push is visible across derivatives infrastructure as well. The reporting also points to CME Group’s plans for crypto futures tied to networks including Cardano, Chainlink, and Stellar, as well as later additions involving Avalanche and Sui, each subject to regulatory approval. Taken together, these moves suggest that tokenization is not confined to equity settlements; it is increasingly being treated as a multi-asset market modernization theme.

What the onchain data says about tokenized stocks

Adoption indicators for tokenized equities continue to strengthen. According to data from RWA.xyz, the value of tokenized stocks rose by 15% over the prior 30 days to $2.53 billion. Over the same period, the number of tokenized equity holders increased by 153% to 2.45 million.

These figures do not directly confirm that LSE 24’s product will match these totals or replicate the same user base, but they provide context: tokenized equity participation appears to be expanding rather than stalling. That matters for regulators and market operators because sustained growth makes it more likely that tokenized securities move from pilot programs to repeatable offerings—especially when supported by established venues.

Investors should also note the asymmetry between “onchain growth” and “regulated venue readiness.” Tokenized stocks can exist onchain in various forms, while access through major exchanges typically requires product-specific compliance, market structure approvals, and operational integration that can take longer to execute than blockchain experimentation.

What to watch before 2027

The most actionable information missing from the excerpt is how LSE’s tokenized stock program will be structured end-to-end—particularly around custody, settlement mechanics, and the exact set of UK equity products to be tracked. As with any tokenized securities rollout on a major exchange, regulatory clarity and operational details will likely be as important as the headline partnership.

Readers should watch for further LSEG and Payward updates on product scope, the mechanics of LSE 24, and how the exchange plans to integrate tokenized equities into existing market and investor protections. With TradFi players increasingly converging on tokenized markets, those implementation specifics may determine whether tokenized equities become a practical alternative for broad investor access—or remain a niche parallel market.