U.S. lawmakers are racing to move the Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act through the Senate before congressional politics reset after the 2026 midterms. With the Senate scheduled to return to Washington on Monday, Majority Leader John Thune has set a cloture vote for Tuesday—an immediate procedural test that will determine whether the bill can clear the 60-vote threshold needed to overcome a filibuster.

The timetable is tight. If CLARITY fails to advance this session, the chamber would effectively be left with less than 36 business days before the 2027 Congress is sworn in, according to earlier reporting linked in this piece. That creates a high-stakes decision point: either push the bill through now, or risk carrying it into a later Congress where party control—and priorities—may look very different.

Key takeaways

• Senate Majority Leader John Thune has scheduled a cloture vote on the CLARITY Act for Tuesday, requiring 60 votes to break a filibuster.
• If the vote fails, the bill may miss its remaining window and roll into the next Congress, potentially delaying meaningful progress on digital-asset policy.
• Senator Cynthia Lummis, a prominent CLARITY backer, suggested the next realistic opportunity for passage could be years away if lawmakers cannot agree.
• Control of the White House remains Republican until January 2029, meaning any future crypto legislation could still face veto risk.
• Crypto-linked political spending continues to shape competitive races leading into 2026, with campaigns and outcomes potentially influencing the next legislative agenda.

CLARITY faces a narrow procedural deadline

After more than a month of state work periods, the U.S. Senate is set to resume session on Monday. The next step for CLARITY is a cloture vote—scheduled for Tuesday—where Republican support alone may not be enough. Under Senate rules, the bill cannot advance past a filibuster without at least 60 votes, meaning a “yes” coalition will need some Democrats to reach the supermajority.

That procedural math is central to why the current session matters. As noted in earlier coverage referenced in the article, a failed push would reduce the Senate’s remaining effective calendar before the 2027 Congress begins. In practical terms, it turns CLARITY from a policy target into a scheduling challenge: even if lawmakers agree on direction, they still must align on timing, floor strategy, and the votes required to move the legislation forward.

Senator Cynthia Lummis, one of CLARITY’s best-known advocates, warned on Sept. 6 that the “next real opportunity” for the bill to pass might not come until much later if lawmakers cannot reach an agreement in the near term. She also indicated she is not running for reelection in 2026, underscoring that the political incentives for individual lawmakers could shift as the calendar turns.

Midterm elections could reset the negotiating dynamics

The midterms are a major variable in how quickly—if at all— CLARITY (and other crypto legislation) could proceed. The 2026 election will determine all 435 House seats and 33 Senate seats. Event contracts referenced in the article currently suggest Democrats have the odds on retaking the House, while their chances of controlling the Senate are described as close to a coin flip.

This distinction matters because the Senate is often the harder venue for major regulatory legislation to clear. A potential change in chamber control could also change leverage: if Republicans lose their legislative trifecta after the midterms, bills like CLARITY may face a different set of priorities, committee dynamics, and negotiating positions.

The backdrop for this urgency is that Republicans previously captured unified control after the 2024 elections. The article notes that this gave the party significant influence over legislation favored by parts of the crypto industry, including the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. If political control shifts next year, the balance could move toward Democrats’ preferences instead.

Crypto-backed political spending and competitive races

Beyond Capitol Hill procedural votes, 2026 is also shaping up as a test of how much influence crypto-aligned advocacy and political spending can translate into electoral outcomes. The article points to Senator Sherrod Brown, a former chair of the Senate Banking Committee, describing how his 2024 race involved substantial spending by cryptocurrency-backed political action committee (PAC) Fairshake and others. Brown was voted out in 2024 by Republican Bernie Moreno.

Brown is now back in a special election race, the article says, running against Republican Jon Husted to finish the term won in 2022 by now-Vice President JD Vance. That puts a familiar storyline in play: crypto industry-aligned groups seek to support candidates perceived as more receptive to digital-asset regulation, while opponents sometimes become the target of attack ads.

The article also highlights that industry-aligned spending does not always guarantee victory. It cites an example from March, when Illinois Lieutenant Governor Juliana Stratton won a Democratic primary for a U.S. Senate seat despite being the target of attack ads funded by industry-linked interests.

In Massachusetts, the article references commentary by Jason Poulos, a Democratic candidate who previously ran against Rep. Jake Auchincloss in a primary for the state’s 4th congressional district. Poulos attributed Auchincloss’s reelection support among crypto-industry groups to his prior vote on CLARITY, while also noting that a Fairshake-affiliated PAC spent about $189,000 on ads supporting Auchincloss.

“The influx of outside crypto industry cash means that these oligarchs have an outsized influence on our representation and federal policies. It is why we need to get big money out of politics […]”

Whether one agrees with that critique or not, the practical takeaway for traders and investors is that legislative timelines are tied to electoral incentives. As these races settle, the coalitions needed for future regulatory bills could either consolidate or fragment.

Presidency and regulators likely keep the pressure on timing

Even if Democrats were to retake one or both chambers in November—or if they fail to win either—one constant remains: Republican control of the White House is scheduled to persist until January 2029. The article explains that this continuation keeps veto power on the table. It also notes that overriding a veto would require a two-thirds supermajority in both chambers, a high bar for major regulatory legislation.

Regulatory leadership adds another layer. The article says the heads of key U.S. financial agencies—specifically the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)—are unlikely to change while Trump remains in office. It further states that President Trump nominated Paul Atkins to chair the SEC and Michael Selig for the CFTC, both of whom have indicated plans to proceed with digital-asset regulation even if Congress does not advance CLARITY this year.

That combination—an enduring executive branch, potential gridlock risk, and regulators signaling continued action—helps explain why CLARITY is being treated as a narrow opportunity rather than a flexible target. Investors often assume regulatory clarity follows legislation, but this story highlights how the absence of congressional momentum can shift the center of gravity toward executive and agency rulemaking.

What to watch next

All eyes are on Tuesday’s cloture vote: whether the CLARITY Act can reach 60 votes will largely determine if lawmakers can lock in statutory clarity during this session or whether the bill becomes a casualty of election-year arithmetic. After the vote, the next question is how quickly—if at all— both parties can align on a path forward, especially given the uncertain control landscape after the 2026 midterms.

The Crypto Council for Innovation (CCI) and Blockchain Association (BA) are seeking to block Illinois from enforcing a 0.2% tax on cryptocurrency transactions before it takes effect in January 2027.

The trade groups said Wednesday that they have filed a motion for a preliminary injunction in the Circuit Court of Sangamon County, Illinois to protect digital asset firms from suffering irreparable harm.

“Companies are being asked to spend millions to build systems for a tax that violates their constitutional rights without answers to basic questions about what is taxed and when, all under the threat of criminal penalties,” said Ji Hun Kim, CCI CEO, in a statement. “These costs are being borne right now, against a Jan. 1 deadline, forcing companies to divert key resources and employees to a clearly unlawful tax.”

The two groups last month filed a lawsuit challenging Illinois’ digital asset tax on the grounds it violated the US Constitution, the state’s constitution, federal and state due process laws and the federal Internet Tax Freedom Act.

Illinois Governor JB Pritzker signed the measure into law as a “privilege tax” in June as part of the state’s fiscal year 2027 budget, requiring crypto users to be taxed as applied to transaction volume rather than income. Another trade group, the Digital Chamber, filed a similar suit days earlier.

The Midwestern state was the first in the nation to single out crypto transactions.

“The state loses very little by waiting. Everyone else loses a great deal by forging ahead. And if this Act stands, Illinois will not be the last state to try it,” said Summer Mersinger, CEO of the Blockchain Association.

Separately, Illinois is also targeting prediction markets. Kalshi’s has filed a lawsuit against Illinois officials over a law that went into effect on July 1 that “expressly bans sports event contracts,” which the company said is in violation of federal law by requiring state licensing.

Separately, Pritzker signed an executive order banning state employees from betting on the platforms in April in an effort to ”prevent insider trading amid the rapid growth of online prediction markets and event-based gambling contracts.”

Magazine: Crypto industry ties were a liability in Illinois primary

Cointelegraph is committed to independent, transparent journalism. This news article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and aims to provide accurate and timely information. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently.

Consensys Software Inc., the Ethereum software company behind MetaMask, plans to split into two independent companies, separating its consumer business from its institutional blockchain infrastructure operations.

According to Wednesday’s announcement, the separation is expected to be completed by the end of 2026, with Joe Lubin serving as chairman and CEO of MetaMask and executive chairman of the new Consensys.

The new Consensys will house the company’s protocols and institutional infrastructure businesses, including Linea, Besu and Teku, and will be led by CEO Mike Kriak and President David Cunningham. The company will focus on Ethereum infrastructure and helping financial institutions deploy blockchain technology for tokenization, stablecoins and other onchain financial services.

MetaMask will remain focused on consumer self-custody while expanding beyond crypto into payments, savings, investing and traditional financial products.

Source: MetaMask

MetaMask has recorded more than 100 million downloads across roughly 190 countries and facilitated trillions of dollars in transaction volume, according to the company.

The company said the restructuring reflects increasingly different priorities for its consumer and institutional businesses.

Related: Ethereum Foundation names 2 ‘must ship’ EIPs for Hegotá upgrade

MetaMask’s evolution beyond crypto wallet

MetaMask, which launched in 2016 as an Ethereum browser extension for accessing decentralized applications and managing crypto assets, has expanded beyond those roots over the past year, adding products spanning payments, yield and tokenized traditional assets.

In June, MetaMask launched Money Account, which allows users to earn up to 4% variable APY on eligible mUSD stablecoin balances and spend the funds through MetaMask Card. The yield is generated through DeFi lending strategies rather than interest paid by MetaMask or the stablecoin issuer.

Source: MetaMask

In February, the company added access to 200 tokenized US stocks, exchange-traded funds and commodities through Ondo Global Markets for eligible users outside the United States.

Later that month, it rolled out its Mastercard-enabled spending card across 49 US states, expanding a product previously available in markets including Europe, Canada, Mexico, Brazil and Argentina.

Magazine: Token buybacks are booming. But are they good for crypto projects?

Bitcoin traded in a cautious range under $80,000 on Wednesday, weighed by a broader risk-off mood driven by escalating tensions tied to Iranian oil shipping and renewed pressure on macro liquidity conditions. At the same time, the Japanese yen strengthened sharply, keeping traders focused on the mechanics of the yen carry trade and the possibility of further currency market intervention.

Market moves unfolded as US stocks drifted lower and crude oil pushed higher after fresh US strikes on Iranian-linked oil tankers. Brent crude climbed above $101 per barrel for the first time since late July, while WTI traded above $96, according to price levels cited alongside TradingView charts.

Key takeaways

• Bitcoin struggled to regain $80,000 after a short-term bounce attempt, while BTC/USD remained roughly flat to slightly lower on the day.
• Oil’s jump—Brent above $101 and WTI above $96—added to pressure on risk assets amid US-Iran developments.
• The yen moved to its strongest level against the dollar since February, trading around 153 per USD, with yen shorts still positioned near record levels.
• Comments from US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent revived attention on possible additional yen intervention, potentially accelerating an unwind in leveraged positions.
• Traders are also watching the Bank of Japan’s next decision, with expectations for a 0.25% rate hike on Sept. 28.

Bitcoin stalls as oil and equities soften

According to TradingView data referenced in the report, BTC/USD’s local upside attempt faded as the pair tried to retest $80,000. At the time of writing, Bitcoin was down about 0.4% on the day, signaling a lack of momentum rather than a decisive breakdown.

That hesitation tracked with weaker sentiment elsewhere. Fresh US strikes on Iranian oil tankers contributed to lower trading in US equities at the Wall Street open, while oil prices printed new three-month highs. The move in energy markets mattered for crypto largely because it reinforced the same macro mix investors often react to: geopolitical shocks, higher near-term inflation expectations, and tighter financial conditions.

Oil has been acting as a transmission channel for risk appetite this week. The article notes Brent’s surge above $101 per barrel, building on gains from the previous session, while WTI held above $96.

Yen strength returns carry-trade risks to the foreground

While oil set the tone for risk assets, the yen’s renewed strength became the centerpiece for traders watching cross-currency liquidity. The Japanese currency was cited as trading around 153 per dollar—its highest level versus the USD since February—and up significantly since early August (the report states a 6.5% rise from the start of August).

The underlying concern is the yen carry trade: when the yen strengthens, positions that borrow yen and buy higher-yielding assets can become vulnerable, forcing reductions and moving liquidity across markets. The article points back to earlier reporting that Japan and the US conducted repeated joint interventions in foreign exchange markets, which helped drive the yen higher rapidly.

That dynamic has also been complicated by speculation that Washington could limit Japan’s selling of US Treasuries as part of future intervention operations—an angle that, if true, would directly connect global reserve flows with yen liquidity.

Near-record yen short positioning raises the stakes

Wednesday’s focus intensified after Barchart flagged record yen short positioning at the start of September, citing Bloomberg data. The report says total yen shorts hovered above 5 trillion yen, a scale large enough to matter if price action forces an orderly unwind to turn into a faster scramble for exits.

In comments to Reuters, Charu Chanana, chief investment strategist at Saxo, argued that the yen’s continued climb could change the pace of de-leveraging. She noted that the carry trade may be particularly exposed because the unwind could be occurring before the Bank of Japan delivers the rate hike investors were expecting.

Chanana’s warning, as quoted in the article, was that while some yen shorts may already have been cut, positioning still appears sizable—meaning further yen gains could shift a gradual reduction in leverage into a more self-reinforcing unwind.

That matters for crypto because many traders treat liquidity conditions—especially those tied to global funding currencies like USD and JPY—as a key input for volatility and risk-taking. If leveraged positions unwind quickly, correlation spikes and sudden repricing can follow across multiple asset classes, including digital assets.

Scott Bessent renews intervention signals ahead of BOJ decision

The yen story also gained a political and policy dimension after renewed hints from US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. Earlier coverage cited in the article described how Bessent suggested the “door was open” to future yen intervention operations, and the current reporting says he reinforced those themes this week.

According to the Financial Times, Bessent made remarks at Southern Methodist University in Texas in which he suggested he has “asymmetric information” about how Japanese policymakers might respond if the US intervenes in the Japanese yen market. The quote, as presented in the report, framed intervention as something he can anticipate—particularly relative to traders positioned in the FX market.

These comments come alongside expectations for the Bank of Japan’s next meeting on Sept. 28. The article notes that traders are looking for a 0.25% interest-rate hike, and it also explains that the yen’s strength has been occurring while the market waits for BOJ action.

In practice, the timing is important: if intervention talk and yen strength persist while the rate decision draws near, the incentive for additional yen-short exposure may drop, while pressure to reduce carry-related leverage could rise.

For investors, the key takeaway is that Bitcoin’s lack of momentum near $80,000 is occurring in a macro environment where both geopolitical risk (via oil) and funding stress (via the yen carry trade) are moving in the same direction—toward tighter conditions for risk assets.

Traders should watch how quickly yen shorts unwind and whether Bessent’s intervention signals translate into more concrete FX-market actions, while also tracking oil’s trajectory and the lead-up to the Bank of Japan’s Sept. 28 decision, which could determine whether current volatility remains contained or escalates.

Mastercard has launched Agent Connect to give merchants one integration for product discovery, cart creation and customer-approved payments across AI shopping platforms.

Mastercard Agent Connect reduces separate merchant integrations

Mastercard said in a Sep. 9 announcement that Agent Connect allows merchants to participate in AI-assisted shopping without building a separate technical connection for every AI platform.

The next front door to commerce may be an AI agent.
Today, we’re introducing Mastercard Agent Connect and expanding Agent Suite for Merchants to help businesses build, connect, and scale AI-powered shopping experiences.
Learn more about how we’re powering the future of commerce… pic.twitter.com/VE1OvdRue4

— Mastercard (@Mastercard) September 9, 2026

Advertisement

Through the service, an AI agent can search a participating merchant’s products, assemble a cart, and move the customer toward payment. A purchase can proceed after the customer gives authorization, keeping the final spending decision under the buyer’s control.

Instead of sending shoppers through several disconnected systems, the integration links merchants with AI agents, digital platforms and payment companies. Mastercard said businesses can use their existing catalogs to supply current prices, product descriptions, and stock information.

Keeping catalog data current matters because an AI agent may make a recommendation or prepare an order without the shopper visiting a conventional product page. Agent Connect gives the merchant a direct role in supplying the information used during that process.

Merchants also retain control over their branding, prices, and customer relationships, according to Mastercard. The payment company designed the service to keep businesses involved from the first product search through the completed transaction, rather than limiting their role to order fulfillment.

Such control may become more important as product searches move from merchant websites and search engines into conversational interfaces. For retailers, inaccurate prices or inventory details presented by an outside agent could lead to failed transactions, refunds, or customer complaints.

Agent Connect sits within Mastercard’s Agent Suite for Merchants, which brings AI shopping and payment services into the same commerce system. Businesses can use the suite within their own digital channels, allowing customers to search for products, compare options, receive recommendations, and complete checkout.

Mastercard adds Anthropic tools to its merchant suite

Working with Anthropic, Mastercard is also giving businesses access to a commerce agent blueprint that combines Claude models with Mastercard’s payment capabilities. Merchants can use the framework to develop shopping agents while retaining control over their digital storefronts.

Rather than focusing only on product discovery, the updated suite supports tasks that arise after payment. Mastercard said merchants can deploy AI agents to help customers monitor orders, request refunds, and process returns.

The partnership connects Anthropic’s models with the payment and authorization layers needed to move from a recommendation to a purchase. Consumer approval remains part of the process, while merchants continue to set product information and commercial terms.

Mastercard Chief Product Officer Jorn Lambert said changes in online shopping will place AI agents between many businesses and their customers.

“AI agents will change the buying interface again,” Lambert said.

Mastercard wants merchants to maintain control as that interface changes, according to the executive. The Agent Suite is structured to let businesses offer AI-supported services inside channels they manage rather than surrendering the entire shopping experience to outside platforms.

Mastercard’s work on Agent Connect follows its June rollout of an AI payment network supported by Ripple, Coinbase, Stripe, Adyen, Cloudflare, OKX, the Solana Foundation and other companies. As crypto.news reported at the time, more than 30 payment, blockchain, and technology firms backed the initiative.

Called Agent Pay for Machines, the system was designed for large numbers of small transactions initiated by autonomous software. Mastercard said users could set spending limits, authorization requirements and settlement conditions, while transactions could move through standard payment networks or stablecoin rails.

Agent Pay verifies customer authority before purchases

Mastercard Agent Pay provides the payment controls behind transactions initiated by AI agents. When a customer allows an agent to make a purchase, the system records that authority through a tokenized permission.

The token helps confirm that the agent has permission to act, separating an authorized purchase from an agent action that falls outside the customer’s instructions. Mastercard’s approach places identity, consent and payment credentials within the transaction process instead of treating the agent like an ordinary cardholder.

Customer authorization remains important when software compares products or prepares a cart based on a general request. An instruction to find a product within a budget, for example, does not necessarily give an agent unlimited authority to complete every related transaction.

With tokenized permissions, payment providers and merchants can receive information showing that an agent acted under a defined instruction. Mastercard said Agent Pay applies its existing security and payment infrastructure to transactions in which software acts for a consumer or business.

Stablecoins are also part of the company’s work on agent-led commerce. In May, MoonPay introduced a Mastercard stablecoin card that lets users authorize AI agents to spend assets held in on-chain wallets.

The MoonAgents Card converts crypto into fiat at checkout and works at merchants that accept Mastercard. According to MoonPay, agents can initiate payments without requiring users to preload a separate balance or first transfer their funds off-chain.

Combining card acceptance with stablecoin balances gives developers another route for building automated payment tools. Mastercard’s own systems can also support card or stablecoin settlement, depending on the product and participating payment provider.

Mastercard supports payments between software and machines

Agent Pay for Machines extends the authorization model beyond consumer shopping by allowing software applications and connected machines to transact with each other. Mastercard designed the service for repeated, low-value payments that may occur too frequently for manual approval each time.

Possible transactions could involve software paying for digital resources or machines purchasing services under preset conditions. Mastercard said the system can process payments through card networks or stablecoins, while owners retain control through spending and authorization rules.

More than 30 companies have joined Mastercard’s machine-payment initiative. Participants include Stripe, Coinbase, Adyen, Checkout.com, Cloudflare, OKX and Global Payments, bringing together payment processors, crypto companies and internet infrastructure providers.

Ripple and Coinbase previously linked stablecoins and blockchain infrastructure to the need for quick, programmable settlement between autonomous agents. During the June launch, RippleX Senior Vice President Markus Infanger said the XRP Ledger and RLUSD could provide fast settlement, predictable costs, programmable compliance and an audit trail.

Coinbase Head of Stablecoin Business Development Nina Coughlin said the exchange was working with Mastercard on an open and interoperable system for agent-led payments. The companies are combining established payment networks with programmable dollars and standards such as x402, according to her comments at the launch.

For U.S. merchants and payment companies, Mastercard’s regulated digital-asset operations provide another relevant layer. Its American subsidiary received a New York BitLicense in May, allowing it to conduct virtual-currency business in the state.

New York’s Department of Financial Services requires BitLicense holders to follow rules covering capitalization, cybersecurity, anti-money laundering controls, sanctions screening and consumer protection. Mastercard said the approval would support work involving stablecoins and tokenized bank deposits under the compliance standards used across its payment network.