Benjamin Cowen, founder of Into The Cryptoverse, publicly admitted his bearish Bitcoin call failed on Monday, as the cryptocurrency broke decisively above $85,000 and squeezed short sellers.

The reversal marks a turning point for one of the market’s most influential bearish voices this cycle.

A Public Reversal Rooted in Cycle Analysis

Cycle analysis is a forecasting method that projects Bitcoin’s trajectory from patterns observed in the previous four-year market periods. Cowen leaned on that framework for months, arguing that history still pointed toward lower prices before any durable recovery.

Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens.

On September 8, he assigned a 65% probability that Bitcoin’s cycle low remained ahead, leaving only a 35% chance the bottom was already in. He repeatedly flagged the realized price near $53,000 as a level that earlier bear markets had tested or undercut.

His July memo centered on a fourth-quarter bottom, most likely in October, echoing midterm-year patterns from 2014, 2018, and 2022. Some scenarios contemplated the downside of $44,000.

Even as Bitcoin reclaimed the mid-70,000s, Cowen maintained it was too early to declare the bear market over. He cited historical pullbacks after golden crosses and warned that a lower peak, similar to 2014 and 2015, remained possible.

In a September 20 update, he conceded the rally had lasted longer than expected. Rising yields, energy prices, and a firmer dollar never delivered the pressure he anticipated.

What Does Bitcoin Above $85,000 Mean?

The market answered quickly and loudly. Bitcoin’s push past $85,000 liquidated more than $831 million in short positions within 24 hours. Long liquidations totaled roughly $130 million over the same span, according to CoinGlass data.

That imbalance shows how heavily traders had positioned for a deeper low that never arrived. Those who followed the bearish roadmap paid a steep and immediate cost.

Cowen responded with unusual candor, saying he was wrong, would offer no excuses, and deserved the criticism coming his way. Analyst Michaël van de Poppe called him one of the few consistently honest bears, noting that everyone eventually errs. Michael Saylor kept his reaction to two words: welcome ₿ack..

The episode carries a broader lesson for crypto investors. Cycle models are probabilistic tools rather than guarantees, and markets can rewrite even well-supported historical analogies.

With Bitcoin holding above $85,000, attention now shifts to whether the breakout matures into a durable bull phase. Residual midterm-year risks could still resurface, but price has delivered its verdict against the deeper fourth-quarter low.

Subscribe to our YouTube channel to watch leaders and journalists provide expert insights.

The post Waited for Bitcoin's October Bottom? Benjamin Cowen Says He Was Wrong appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Source link

Bitcoin (BTC) spiked above $86,000 after Monday’s Wall Street open as US stocks rose amid cooling oil prices.

Key points:

• Bitcoin gained nearly 6% on Monday to briefly trade above $86,000 for the first time since late January.
• Crypto short liquidations totaled almost $800 million in 24 hours as analysis called the start of a “new bull market.”
• US stocks opened the week higher as WTI oil prices dipped below $92 per barrel.

Bitcoin, US stocks head higher as oil drops further

TradingView data showed Bitcoin hitting a new 33-week high of $86,332 on Bitstamp, up 5.7% on the day at the time of writing.

Upside quickly returned after Sunday’s weekly close, which, at $81,120, was Bitcoin’s highest since the start of May, as oil prices continued a drop from late last week.

Signals from both Qatar’s Foreign Ministry and US President Donald Trump that diplomatic negotiations to end the US-Iran war could resume helped send WTI crude oil as low as $91.59 per barrel on Monday.

Advertisement

“Middle East oil flows remain surprisingly strong despite the disruption to Saudi Arabia’s ‌East-West pipeline,” JPMorgan analysts said in a note on Friday, quoted by CNBC and others.

A report by The New York Times additionally claimed that the US planned to extend its trade deal with China by six months ahead of Chinese President Xi Jinping’s visit on Sept. 23-25.

The S&P 500 and tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite Index were up 1% and 1.6%, respectively, at the time of writing.

Crypto short liquidations near $800 million in 24 hours

Bitcoin’s gains, meanwhile, led to increasingly optimistic commentary on longer-term price strength. 

Advertisement

Related: Strategy buys 950 Bitcoin for $76M, repurchases $174M in STRC

In its latest analysis on X, trading resource The Kobeissi Letter described crypto as being “in a new bull market.” Kobeissi referenced 50% gains for BTC/USD over just two months as crypto short liquidations neared $800 million over 24 hours. 

Commenting on Bitcoin’s short-term prospects, Bitfinex Alpha, the research arm of crypto exchange Bitfinex, flagged buyer support, rising open interest and fresh capital inflows to US spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) as three key requirements for further price upside.

“For a breakout to be validated, we would want to see net taker buying rather than the profit-taking that capped the advances on 18 and 19 September,” it noted in a Monday blog post, adding: 

Advertisement

“Coin-denominated open interest would also need to expand, indicating fresh positioning rather than a move driven primarily by short covering. Conversely, a daily close beneath $77,100 invalidates the structure to the downside, exposing the True Market Mean at $76,677.”

Exchange BTC open interest data (screenshot). Source: CoinGlass

Crypto trader and analyst Rekt Capital, meanwhile, confirmed that BTC/USD had broken out of a cycle of lower highs in place since October 2025, and with it its prior macro downtrend. In his latest X analysis, he identified a new target trading range between $86,681 and $93,659.

“If Bitcoin is ready to confirm a breakout from the $60k-$80k Range, its next milestone would be to try to enter the blue-blue Range,” he wrote in commentary on a chart highlighting the range, which figured prominently at the end of 2025.

BTC/USD one-week chart. Source: Rekt Capital on X.com

Source link

Source link

The Silicon Valley-based Perplexity AI predicts XRP could have a tame Q4, saying it believes the token will only hit $3.25 by January 1, 2027. This prediction comes as other AI models and analysts call for XRP to trade $7-10 by the end of the year.

XRP currently trades near $1.49 as of September 21, 2026, after a strong rebound alongside Bitcoin’s surge above $84,000–$85,000 earlier today. This BTC breakout has fueled widespread belief that the cycle bottom is in and a broader bull market is underway, providing a powerful tailwind for large-cap alts like XRP.

This Perplexity forecast assumes that macro conditions align to trigger a “full-blown” bull market between now and December 2026, characterized by sustained institutional inflows, positive regulatory clarity, and a breakout above key multi-year resistance levels.

The base bullish target of $3.25 represents a successful retest of the 2021/2024 cycle highs and aligns with the upper end of conservative 2027 bull ranges projected by analysts. Achieving this would require XRP to break the critical $1.70–$2.00 congestion zone and ride a wave of retail FOMO similar to previous alt seasons.
As for the optimistic target of $4.50, Perplexity AI states that this would be a scenario where XRP decouples from Bitcoin and sees massive utility-driven demand (e.g., widespread XRPL adoption or ETF inflows); the price could extend toward $4.50.

This target sits just below the psychological $5.00 barrier and corresponds to the aggressive end of 2027 forecasts from firms like Standard Chartered and Bitwise.

Perplexity AI Predicts XRP to $3.25: Does the Technical Analysis Support the Prediction?

XRP’s technical setup is currently building a massive multi-year accumulation base that could support a violent upside move if confirmed. On the weekly timeframe, XRP is forming a textbook inverse head-and-shoulders pattern, a highly bullish reversal structure that has been building since the 2021 highs.

The “neckline” of this pattern sits around $1.55–$1.70; a decisive weekly close above this level would technically confirm the pattern and project a measured move targeting the $3.00–$4.00 range.

Furthermore, the monthly Relative Strength Index (RSI) is resetting from overbought conditions without breaking the long-term bullish trend, suggesting the asset is coiling for its next major leg up.

The alignment of moving averages on the daily chart, specifically, the price holding above the 200-day EMA, indicates that the long-term trend remains intact despite short-term consolidation.

If the anticipated bull market materializes, a breakout above the $2.00 psychological barrier would likely trigger a “price discovery” phase, where the lack of historical resistance allows for rapid appreciation toward the $3.25 target.

Bitcoin Hyper Targets Early Mover Upside as XRP Tests Key Levels

A 45-week-overdue moving average flip is exactly the kind of headline that gets long-term holders nodding along, but at a $1.49 handle, XRP’s percentage upside from here is a different animal than it was at $0.1. Doubling from here adds $100Bn to the market cap.

That math is why traders chasing asymmetric returns are increasingly looking one layer down, toward infrastructure being built directly on top of Bitcoin’s network.

Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER) is positioning itself as the first Bitcoin Layer 2 with full SVM integration. Hyper runs smart contracts at speeds it claims outpace Solana, while settling back to Bitcoin’s base chain for security. The presale has raised $33M at a current token price of just $0.0136865, with staking rewards offered at a high 30% APY.

Its Decentralized Canonical Bridge aims to solve BTC’s two biggest structural gaps: near-zero programmability and sluggish, expensive transaction throughput.

Gain Access to New Bitcoin Layer 2 Early Here

Discover: The Best Token Presales

The post Perplexity AI Predicts Weak XRP Price by 2027: Bull Run Canceled? appeared first on Cryptonews.

Source link

Quick Read

• Intel surged 255% to $109, with Q2 revenue up 25% to $16 billion and Data Center sales jumping 59% year over year.

• NVIDIA took a $5 billion stake in Intel and selected Xeon 6 as host CPU for DGX Rubin systems, flipping rivalry into partnership.

• At 57x forward earnings with Foundry burning up to $2.5 billion per quarter, Intel is priced as a finished turnaround while still being fixed.

• Just released. Our analysts combed the entire stock market and named the ten best stocks to buy right now, and Intel didn’t make the cut. Enter your email to see the names that beat INTC. The report is free. Enter your email and see if any of your stocks made the cut.

Intel (NASDAQ:INTC) has gone from a low-twenties stock that missed the AI wave to a name trading at $108.60, a 255.25% one-year run.

The operational fix under CEO Lip-Bu Tan is genuine, and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) validated it by taking a $5 billion equity stake in Q3 2025. The debate has shifted from whether Intel can be fixed to whether the share price has already spent the fix.

Q2 revenue reached $16.13 billion, up 25.4% year over year, beating consensus by 11.64%. Non-GAAP EPS came in at $0.42 versus a $0.22 estimate.

Data Center and AI revenue hit $6.26 billion, up 59%, with Xeon 6 selected as host CPU for NVIDIA’s DGX Rubin NVL8 systems.

Tan called the quarter Intel’s “strongest revenue growth in more than fifteen years”, and Intel 18A entered high-volume manufacturing.

Advertisement

Where Intel Stands Against AMD and NVIDIA

Against Advanced Micro Devices (NASDAQ:AMD), Intel is finally landing punches in server CPUs, with management saying “strong demand for our products continue to outpace our growing supply.”

Against NVIDIA, the relationship has flipped from rivalry to partnership on the CPU side, but NVIDIA’s AI-compute franchise remains the reason Intel Foundry still lost $2.1 billion last quarter.

Free Report, Just Released

Why Didn’t INTC Make The Top 10 List?

24/7 Wall St has helped investors make money for over two decades, and our top analysts just finished ranking the definitive Top 10 Stocks To Buy Now. Not the ten biggest companies. Not the ten everyone is arguing about. The ten best stocks to buy right now.

Advertisement

And INTC didn’t make the cut!

The report is free, and you can see why we think each stock is a top investment today.

Enter Your Email and See the Ten →

External Foundry revenue was only $293 million, a rounding error next to the manufacturing bill Intel is carrying.

Advertisement

Valuation Is Now Doing the Heavy Lifting

Market cap sits at roughly $574 billion on a forward P/E of 57x, with trailing EPS still negative at -$2.09.

Wall Street’s mean target of $116.37 sits barely above spot, and the consensus is a Hold with 32 holds against 14 buys.

The 2027 EPS range runs from $1.15 to $3.44, a dispersion that suggests the market is guessing how fast Foundry losses fade.

Bull and Bear Case for INTC Stock

Bulls point to Melius, which values the parts at near $200 and floats a possible foundry separation around 2030. If 14A lands customers and Foundry losses narrow, that math survives.

Advertisement

Bears note that Intel still posted a $11.03 billion GAAP net loss last quarter, that Foundry burns $2.1 billion to $2.5 billion per quarter, and that a 57x forward multiple leaves no room for a stumble on 18A yields or Panther Lake ramp costs.

The deciding variable is external Foundry commitments on 14A. Without them, Intel is priced as a finished turnaround while still being fixed.

Even though the earnings multiple is high, if you’re very bullish on the AI buildout, going for INTC stock is not a bad idea today. If you look multiple years into the future, Intel still has growth potential left if AI causes chip demand to continue growing explosively. That said, this remains a more optimistic scenario than what most analysts are pricing in. Revenue growth is expected to fall to 19% annually in 2027. Nvidia should comfortably grow much more than that despite being massively larger. And it’s also cheaper.

Got $1,000? Before You Buy INTC, Read This

If you have cash sitting in your account right now, give this two minutes. After more than two decades of helping investors beat the market, our top analysts at 24/7 Wall St. put together a definitive report on the Top 10 Stocks To Buy Today. And INTC wasn’t one of them.

They combed the entire market. It’s not 10 ideas, not 10 stocks everyone is talking about, it’s what their research points to as the 10 best stocks to buy right now, and it’s free. Read more here and see which stocks made the list –>>

Advertisement

Contact editorial@247wallst.com for any questions or corrections.

Source link

Global cryptocurrency derivatives platform Zoomex will host the “ZOOMEX TRADERS AFTER PARTY @ TOKEN2049 SINGAPORE” on October 7, 2026, at the Echo Live Party in Singapore.

Organized as an official side event during TOKEN2049 Singapore, the gathering invites traders, Web3 founders, creators, and partners to connect beyond the main conference floor, exchange market insights, and expand their industry networks. (Luma)

Centering on the theme “CRYPTO TRADING · WEB3 · LIVE MUSIC · NETWORKING,” the event seamlessly blends market discussions with an elevated party experience. Guests can engage directly with industry KOLs and the Zoomex team, participate in special guest Q&As, and make new connections over live music and open networking.

Where’s the Edge? From Crypto Trading to Broader Markets

As trading options expand rapidly, where do traders truly find their edge? Is it early opportunity detection, smarter tool utilization, or a distinct approach to market dynamics and risk management?

The event will feature a flagship panel titled “Where’s the Edge? Trading Crypto and Beyond,” bringing together top industry KOLs to share insights across crypto assets and traditional market setups. Discussions will span derivatives, TradFi, and prediction markets, with a focus on how copy trading, AI assistance, and strategic tools are reshaping how traders gather information, make decisions, and execute strategies.

Grounded in practical trading needs, the panel gives speakers from diverse backgrounds a platform to share market observations, offering attendees fresh perspectives to compare and discuss. Conversations will continue into the open networking sessions following the panel.

This theme reflects Zoomex’s core focus on derivatives while expanding its broader trading ecosystem. As the platform moves into TradFi and new trading venues, it continues to anchor its operations around “Easy to Use. Transparent. Fair.”, prioritizing seamless user experience, transparent fee structures, and clear rule mechanisms. (Luma)

Ollie Bearman to Join for an Exclusive Community Q&A

TGR Haas F1 Team driver Ollie Bearman will attend as a special guest, hosting an interactive Q&A session that offers traders and motorsport fans an up-close, face-to-face experience. (Luma)

As the Official Cryptocurrency Exchange Partner of the Haas F1 Team, Zoomex continues to bridge high-profile sports sponsorships with real community engagement, letting attendees experience the thrill of racing alongside market insights. (Zoomex)

Live Music and Grand Prizes Set the Stage for Networking

The evening will feature live performances by singers and dancers, a DJ set, interactive lucky draws, and ample dedicated networking time. Attendees can discuss products with the Zoomex team, swap market insights with creators, or catch up with industry peers on conversations started during the main conference. (Luma)

A MacBook Air and iPhone Duo lead the lineup of grand prizes for the night’s lucky draw, adding extra excitement to the evening. Eligibility and prize collection will follow official event rules.

From deep market discussions and celebrity guest interactions to live entertainment, Zoomex aims to make the Traders After Party a premier gathering for the trading community — a place to share ideas, meet peers in a relaxed setting, and build direct, lasting connections.

Registration is now open. Interested traders, founders, creators, and industry partners can apply via the official Zoomex Luma event page. The event takes place on the evening of October 7 at Echo Live Party Singapore; Final entry details and agenda are subject to the official event listing. (Luma)

About Zoomex

Founded in 2021, Zoomex is a global cryptocurrency trading platform focused on derivatives trading. The platform serves over 3 million users across 35+ countries and regions, offering access to 590+ trading pairs. Built around easy to use, transparency, fairness, and speed, Zoomex provides a clear and efficient trading experience for users worldwide.

Through its high-performance matching engine, clear asset and order displays, and transparent fee and rule mechanisms, Zoomex helps users better understand their account status, order execution, trading costs, and results. Zoomex maintains registrations, licenses, and regulatory statuses across multiple jurisdictions, including the U.S. MSB, Canada MSB, U.S. NFA, and Australia AUSTRAC, and has completed security audits conducted by blockchain security firm Hacken. The platform also continues to strengthen its trust framework through Proof of Reserves, Security & Transparency, Compliance Information, and Fees / Rules Transparency initiatives.

Beyond trading, Zoomex builds a refined brand experience through elite sports partnerships, including the TGR Haas F1 Team, World Cup-winning goalkeeper Emiliano Martínez, and world-class tennis events such as Wimbledon. The values of speed, precision, discipline, fair play, and rule-based execution are closely aligned with Zoomex’s approach to derivatives trading.

At Zoomex: Easy to Use. Transparent balance. Fair access to your earnings.

The post Zoomex to Host Traders After Party During TOKEN2049 Singapore, Connecting Traders and the Web3 Community appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Source link

Source link

Source link

A French family was tied up for hours by attackers after their crypto. Police have not said how the attackers chose the house, and that gap is where the industry’s data problem lives.

At around 4 a.m. on September 20, four hooded men forced their way into a family home in northern France. They bound the parents and two children with black tape and forced the father to hand over his access codes and move 40,000 euros. 

The father is a salaried IT worker in the crypto industry. Prosecutors have not said yet how the attackers identified him.

A separate incident in the same month showed how easily that kind of information gets out. On August 13, hardware wallet maker Trezor told 13,689 customers that a breach at one of its shipping providers had exposed sensitive order data. The number grew to over 80,000.

Nothing links the two cases, and nothing needs to. Together, they describe the same exposure from both ends: a database that pairs a home address with proof of crypto ownership, and what happens when someone acts on that pairing.

BeInCrypto spoke with experts from Hacken and Zama to uncover what a provider owes its customers when a supplier leaks their identity, which data the industry should stop keeping, and how a client could tell that a custodian will fail them under coercion.

What “No Keys Compromised” Leaves Out

When Trezor announced the breach in August, it made a point of what had not happened. Its own systems were not compromised, it said, and its devices were secure. 

Those assurances addressed the risk that hardware wallets exist to prevent: theft of funds.

However, Hacken’s Head of GRC and Security Operations, Dmytro Yasmanovych, explained that the absence of a stolen private key does not mean customers are out of danger. 

“Someone who knows your name, home address, and that you own a hardware wallet has information they can use to target you. You can replace a compromised key in minutes. You cannot do the same with your home address.”

He argues that this is why the information held by delivery companies and other suppliers deserves as much attention as the wallet itself. If a database links a crypto holder to their home, the consequences can reach their family, too, Yasmanovych added.

“So a provider can prevent anyone from accessing your funds and still leave you exposed in a much more personal way. The question is whether its security measures protect the customer, not just the wallet.”

The French Numbers Behind the Warning

France shows what that looks like. Interior Minister Laurent Nuñez said in late June that authorities had recorded more than 70 crypto-related violent incidents since January. 

Chainalysis, which counted publicly reported cases, logged 30 in France through mid-2026, compared with 19 for the whole of 2025. 

The firm calls a data breach the likeliest cause. It points to a 2024 case in which a French tax official allegedly stole dossiers on high-net-worth crypto holders, including addresses and phone numbers, and sold them to criminal intermediaries. 

The family exposure Yasmanovych describes is visible in the same data. In France, more than 40% of incidents targeted a relative rather than the holder. Overall, home invasions made up 37% of documented attacks by mid-2026, up from 26% in 2023.

Chainalysis estimated that violent attacks on holders worldwide took more than $30 million in the first half of the year. This counts only attacks where the holder gave up funds.

The report puts total exposure at $107 million, including ransom demands, blocked transfers, and recovered funds, while noting that even that figure covers only reported cases.

The Data Behind the Target

Those attacks need a target, and the target may come from a record somebody kept. That makes data retention another security issue for the crypto industry. 

Companies may need customer information for a specific transaction or service. However, keeping it indefinitely can create a separate risk if that information is later exposed. So which piece of customer information should the industry stop collecting, or delete sooner than it does?

Yasmanovych names the phone number. He explained that a company might need one to arrange a delivery, but that does not explain why it should remain in a customer database for years.

Thus, if the database is breached, the number can become useful for phishing, voice scams, or SIM-swap attempts.

“I would remove the link between an order and a physical delivery address once the delivery is complete and there is no longer a business reason to keep it. The company can retain what it needs for tax and warranty purposes without keeping a complete record of where every order was delivered.”

He outlined another problem: deleting data often relies on someone saying it has been done.

“In one case, a company had a ninety-day retention rule and written confirmation from its fulfilment partner that older records had been removed. Years of data was still sitting in their systems. That is why I would want evidence of deletion, not just a retention policy. If nobody checks whether the rule was followed, the rule offers little protection.”

The same responsibility extends to what happens after customer information is exposed. According to Yasmanovych, in addition to a warning email, the provider needs to explain exactly what information was exposed. 

“A leaked city is one thing. A name, home address, and proof of crypto ownership create a different level of risk…Someone whose address was leaked may need help arranging future deliveries without sharing it again… There should be a direct person or team to contact when the situation requires more than a standard FAQ.”

He mentioned that the provider also needs to address what allowed the exposure to happen. If the supplier keeps data beyond the agreed retention period, customers should be told how that will be prevented and how deletion will be checked in the future.

“A warning email is the starting point. People need to know what happened, what they can do now, and whether the company has actually fixed the process that failed.”

Trezor’s response to its own breach can be measured against that list. It emailed affected customers individually, specifying whether their exposure was full or partial, and warned about phishing and, in September, physical security risks. 

It also promised an Anonymous Delivery option using locker pickup, unbranded packaging, and automatic deletion of shipping identifiers.

Can Privacy Technology Close the Gap?

The problem is not limited to the data companies store off-chain. As more financial activity moves onto public blockchains, the transactions themselves can create another layer of exposure.

Zama CEO and Co-Founder Dr. Rand Hindi said the Trezor incident highlights an off-chain data retention problem. 

He argued that as institutional capital moves onchain at scale, onchain confidentiality stops being a feature and becomes the condition for participation. Hindi cited a BCG estimate that digital real-world assets could reach roughly 16% of global investable assets by 2035.

He said regulated institutions cannot operate on a public ledger where every position and counterparty relationship is visible. The executive pointed to fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) as one way to address this without sacrificing compliance. 

“FHE allows computation directly on encrypted data – a transfer executes, an AML threshold is checked, eligibility is verified, all on ciphertext – with no validator or block explorer ever seeing a balance or other sensitive data. When a regulator requires access, a permissioned threshold of key holders (compliance team) authorises decryption enforced at the protocol layer, not through a policy.”

Privacy technology can also limit how much information companies must disclose without making verification impossible.

Yasmanovych said zero-knowledge proofs can allow an exchange to demonstrate that it holds enough assets to cover customer balances without publishing every customer’s balance.

The exchange can therefore share evidence of its overall position without putting individual account information on display. The expert added that this does not mean the information becomes inaccessible. 

Depending on how the system is designed, an authorised investigator may still be able to examine the evidence and underlying records through an appropriate audit or legal process.

He added that selective disclosure works on a similar principle when sharing identity information. A service might need to confirm that someone meets a particular requirement without receiving their entire identity document or customer profile.

“Neither approach solves the problem of personal data held outside the blockchain. Transaction amounts, timing, and wallet connections may remain visible, while identity documents and home addresses continue to sit in exchange, delivery, and payment databases.”

Yasmanovych mentioned that the gap is fairly straightforward. A company can improve privacy around the transaction itself while leaving the information needed to deliver and support that transaction exposed elsewhere.

When the Credentials Are Real, and the Customer Is Not Free

The distinction between transaction privacy and personal safety becomes even more important when a customer is forced to authorise a transfer. A custody provider may have secure infrastructure and strong access controls. 

But those safeguards face a different test when a customer is coerced into handing over their assets. 

Yasmanovych said a technical audit can show that the system works as designed. It is less useful for understanding what happens when someone is forced to hand over their assets.

“I would test the withdrawal process under that kind of pressure. For example, a customer with valid credentials requests a large transfer while someone is coercing them. Can the provider recognise the situation, pause the withdrawal, or bring in someone else before the money leaves?”

His required controls are a second authorised person and a mandatory delay on large transfers, neither of which the customer can remove during the same session. Yasmanovych highlighted that the point is to give the provider a chance to intervene when a valid login does not necessarily mean the customer is acting freely.

“I would also ask to see the process in action. A policy can require a second approval, but that does not tell you whether the approval is genuinely independent or whether staff can bypass it. A live test would expose those weaknesses much faster than another clean technical audit.”

A custody system can work exactly as designed and still fail the person using it. The last step always runs through a human being, and a human being can be threatened.

Where the Responsibility Now Sits

The attacks in France show how the risks around crypto extend past a compromised wallet or a stolen private key. A customer’s name, address, phone number, and proof of ownership become valuable once they sit in the same database. 

Privacy technology can limit what is exposed on-chain, but it does nothing to address information that companies and their suppliers keep elsewhere.

That widens what a provider is responsible for. It covers how assets are stored and moved, which customer data is collected, how long it stays accessible, and what happens when someone is forced to use their own credentials. Keys are part of that chain that the industry already knows how to protect.

The post Crypto Security Now Extends Past the Wallet to the Customer's Address appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Source link

In Cardano news today, the delegated representatives voted down a request to withdraw 12.29 million ADA from the community treasury to fund Input Output’s Pogun Bitcoin DeFi product. The final Koios summary recording 35.67% of DRep voting power in favor, against 64.33% opposed.

The ADA stays in the treasury, but Cardano also forfeits the revenue-sharing terms Input Output had attached to the deal, and Charles Hoskinson has since said IOG will no longer default to launching future products on Cardano.

Pogun is Input Output’s pitch for bringing Bitcoin into decentralized finance through a credit market, a yield product, and a BitVM-powered trust-minimized bridge. The rejected on-chain proposal asked for 12.29 million ADA and tied repayment to quarterly earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, with the calculation anchored to $2.95 million in EBITDA.

Cardano (ADA)

24h7d30d1yAll time

Input Output’s April 2026 overview had promised 20% of Pogun earnings back to the treasury until the initial funding was repaid, followed by a perpetual 5% return on Cardano-related products. The on-chain proposal that DReps actually voted on carried no explicit exclusivity covenant.

Cardano governance requires sign-off from both the Constitutional Committee and DReps for a treasury action to pass. The committee cleared Pogun unanimously; the body elected directly by ADA holders did not, which is what makes the split notable.

The practical result? Cardano keeps its ADA but gives up the revenue share it was offered, a difference that matters more for Cardano’s treasury sustainability.

Earn $50 and Enter $300K Prize Draw on EdgeX

Why This Counts As An ADA Governance Check?

Input Output helped build Cardano and remains a major commercial contributor, which is exactly why the vote matters. Pogun’s own framing argued Cardano was the right execution environment for Bitcoin DeFi on technical grounds, not by default. ADA holders weren’t required to accept that argument on the terms presented, and enough of them didn’t.

Hoskinson used a Sept. 18, 2026, broadcast to respond directly. He said Input Output would now choose whichever network best serves each product instead of applying automatic Cardano priority. He also added that traffic from an unfunded product could route elsewhere and that another ecosystem could receive exclusivity in exchange for support.

He still described Cardano as the strongest technical fit for Bitcoin DeFi connecting systems built on Bitcoin-like transaction outputs, a nuance that separates this from a simple exit. It reads more like a policy change forced by a governance body that IOG itself helped design, a tension also visible in how IOG has positioned Midnight-linked development outside strict Cardano exclusivity.

Trade Cardano on Bybit and Get a Chance to Win Our $1,000 USDT Airdrop

What’s Next For Cardano After This News?

Hoskinson said Pogun would still arrive within 90 days of the broadcast, or roughly by mid-December 2026, regardless of the vote’s outcome. Input Output has not disclosed which chain will host it, and the ecosystem that ends up with Pogun could capture the revenue share Cardano just walked away from.

Hoskinson also said RealFi, a separate Input Output initiative, is set to launch on Cardano in October 2026, giving Cardano holders a near-term test beyond the news.

Discover: The Best Token Presales

The post Cardano News: DReps’ Pogun Vote Opens a New Chapter for ADA appeared first on Cryptonews.

Source link