Connect with us

Business

what the self-lay market actually offers developers

Published

on

A developer needing a new water connection in England or Wales can choose between the incumbent water company and an accredited self-lay organisation, because new connection work sits in a regulated competitive market overseen by Ofwat.

The choice is real, but it is narrower and more procedural than most first-time developers expect, and the parts of the job that can be competed for are defined by the water company that will eventually own the pipe.

Understanding where that line falls is the difference between a useful second price and a wasted fortnight. Plenty of developers find out about self-lay halfway through the process, after a quotation has already landed, and assume the option has closed. Usually it hasn’t.

Who is allowed to lay a new water main

Work on a new water connection splits into contestable and non-contestable elements. Contestable work can be carried out by the water company, by an accredited self-lay organisation appointed by the developer, or in some cases by a new appointee, and it typically covers the new mains, the service pipes and much of the on-site construction. Non-contestable work stays with the appointed water company, and in most regions that includes the final connection into the live network and the point at which water is let into the new main.

Free newsletters
Advertisement

The stories that matter to UK business, straight to your inbox.

Advertisement

The precise boundary is not fixed in legislation. Each water company publishes an addendum to the sector code of practice for self-laying of water mains and services, setting out which activities it treats as contestable in its own area. A developer building across two supply areas can genuinely face two different answers to the same question, so the sensible first move is to pull the relevant company’s current developer services and self-lay documentation before pricing anything. Ofwat’s overview of the connections market is a reasonable starting point for anyone meeting the terminology for the first time.

Adoption is the other half of the arrangement. Whoever installs the pipework, the water company adopts the finished infrastructure into the public network once it complies with the adoption agreement and the associated testing and assurance requirements. Ofwat’s Code for Adoption Agreements sits behind that process, requiring companies to publish sector guidance and model adoption agreements that developers and self-lay organisations can work from.

What WIRS accreditation covers, and what it doesn’t

The Water Industry Registration Scheme is the accreditation water companies rely on when deciding whether a contractor’s work can be adopted, and it is currently administered by LRQA. Assessment covers the technical areas a self-lay organisation operates in, and the scheme exists so that an accredited firm is recognised across water companies rather than having to secure approval company by company. A developer can check any contractor’s current status on the WIRS register in about a minute.

Accreditation scope is where care is needed. WIRS registration is granted for specific activities, so a contractor accredited for service pipes is not automatically accredited for new mains, and a firm accredited for construction may not hold every category a particular scheme requires. Asking which categories a contractor holds, rather than asking whether they are accredited, is the question that separates a straightforward job from a stalled one. Accreditation also does not override the water company’s own technical standards, witnessing requirements or defect liability terms, all of which still apply.

Advertisement

Taking approved drawings to an accredited contractor

The most common misunderstanding in the whole process concerns approved drawings. A developer who has applied to the water company, paid for the scheme to be worked up and received approved drawings alongside a quotation has not committed to that company carrying out the construction. Approval attaches to the scheme, not to the contractor, and the contestable elements remain open.

That matters commercially because the approved drawings are a complete package: pipe sizes, routes, materials, fittings and connection points are all fixed and signed off. A developer holding those drawings can send them out for pricing exactly as any other subcontract package would go out, and compare like with like rather than comparing two different interpretations of the same site. Contractors working in this market, among them the Hertfordshire-based utility contractor McFadden Utilities, will provide an alternative quote for a new water connection against drawings the water company has already approved, with the water company retaining approval, inspection and adoption of the finished works throughout. The initial approach to the water company still comes from the developer, and the accredited contractor picks the process up from the point where the scheme is agreed.

None of this is adversarial. Water companies set the standards the assets have to meet and then carry those assets for the next century, which is why the assurance requirements are as detailed as they are. Many accredited self-lay organisations also work under contract to water companies on repair, maintenance and mains work, so the same crews turn up on both sides of the arrangement. Competition in this market was designed into it by the regulator rather than fought for against the companies.

Where the money and the time actually move

Cost differences in self-lay come from three places, and claims of dramatic savings usually rest on only one of them applying. The first is the construction price itself, which is a straightforward competitive tender once the drawings are fixed. The second is the asset payment, the sum a water company pays for the value of the infrastructure it adopts, which offsets against the developer’s costs and is calculated under the company’s published charging arrangements. The third is coordination, and on multi-utility sites it is often the largest of the three, because a single groundworks operation covering water alongside other services means one set of excavations, one reinstatement and one traffic management exercise rather than three.

Advertisement

Programme is the other reason developers look at self-lay, and the honest position is that self-lay moves the construction window into the developer’s control while leaving the application, approval and adoption stages where they always were. A contractor cannot compress the water company’s approval process, and any firm suggesting otherwise is worth a second look.

The questions worth asking before appointing

Four checks cover most of the risk. Confirm the contractor’s WIRS categories match the actual works. Confirm which elements the local water company treats as non-contestable, and who is pricing them. Confirm who is responsible for testing, chlorination, as-built records and defect remedy during the liability period. And confirm the reinstatement specification, because unsatisfactory reinstatement on an adopted highway becomes the developer’s problem long after the water is flowing.

Self-lay is not the right answer to every scheme. For a single connection off an existing main in a straightforward location, the water company’s own quotation is frequently the simplest route and the difference is marginal. For anything involving new mains, phased plots, awkward crossings or a tight build programme, a second price from an accredited contractor is cheap information, and the drawings a developer already holds are all that’s needed to get one.

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Business

Wood River Capital sells $58.1 million of Aspen Aerogels stock

Published

on


Wood River Capital sells $58.1 million of Aspen Aerogels stock

Continue Reading

Business

Tratos UK CEO Maurizio Bragagni

Published

on

Tratos UK CEO Maurizio Bragagni

Maurizio Bragagni is chairman and CEO of Tratos UK, the British arm of the family-owned cable maker Tratos Group, which produces energy, telecommunications and specialist cables for customers the company says include National Grid and Network Rail. The group is marking 60 years of cable manufacturing in 2026, a milestone it celebrated at the TOC Europe 2026 exhibition in Hamburg. In the UK, Tratos runs its head office in London, two manufacturing sites in Knowsley, Merseyside, and a fibre optic cable facility in Swindon. He tells Business Matters why getting cables right makes a real difference, what he would change about his approach to digital transformation and why every business should aim for something bigger than making money.

What do you currently do at Tratos UK?

I am the Chairman and CEO of Tratos UK, with leadership responsibilities across the wider Tratos Group. Our business focuses on cable manufacturing, providing solutions used throughout modern infrastructure, and in the UK we make every element of our cables ourselves, from the conductors and insulating compounds to the fibre optics and the finished cable.

My role is to keep the business competitive and innovative while keeping pace with changing customer needs. That covers everything from strategy and business development to stakeholder engagement and long-term planning. On any given day I might be discussing major infrastructure projects with clients, reviewing manufacturing investment, meeting government representatives or working with supply chain partners.

Free newsletters
Advertisement

The stories that matter to UK business, straight to your inbox.

Advertisement

A big focus for me right now is the future of energy. Renewable power, grid modernisation, energy security, transport electrification and industrial decarbonisation are all changing the industry, so I spend a lot of time working on how Tratos can respond to that.

On the other side of that is people. Creating opportunities for our employees and ensuring Tratos grows sustainably are among the most rewarding parts of my role.

What was the inspiration behind your business?

I have always been drawn to businesses that solve practical problems. Cables are maybe not an obvious choice, but they are vital to nearly every aspect of modern life. So when you get cables right, it makes a genuine difference.

At Tratos, we want to create value through manufacturing excellence, innovation and entrepreneurship. That seems like a grand goal for a family-owned business, but I have seen how dynamic entrepreneurial businesses can be. We can move quickly without losing sight of our values, and I think that is really important.

Advertisement

I have also always been interested in international cooperation. Throughout my career I have worked across various countries and cultures, seeing how businesses can unite people, create opportunities and promote economic development, and that has become a priority for Tratos. Industry can play such a vital role in society, creating jobs and building skills as well as making products.

Ultimately, I suppose my inspiration has always been tied to building something lasting. I do not just want success now. I want to build a business that can keep creating opportunities and delivering value for future generations.

Who do you admire?

I admire a lot of people. Those who combine vision with action, like entrepreneurs who show so much resilience, determination and optimism, which is something I think we could all do with more of.

Equally, I admire industrial pioneers, for similar reasons. These are people who have transformed entire sectors through innovation and their willingness to challenge conventional thinking, and we need that to progress. Then there are the leaders who show integrity and courage, because character matters just as much as determination.

Advertisement

There are also the people I have worked with: the engineers, technicians and managers who contribute so much but never get the attention.

Perhaps most of all, I admire those who never stop learning. I am in awe of the people who stay curious and committed to continuous improvement.

Looking back, is there anything you would have done differently?

Like most people, there are many things I would have done differently, but I also try to view mistakes as an opportunity to learn. If I had to choose one thing to change, it would be my approach to digital transformation. Innovation has always been a priority for Tratos, but I was cautious, and there are areas where we would have benefited from adopting new technology more quickly.

Delegation is probably something else I could have learned earlier. I used to want to be involved in everything, but that never works. You achieve far more by building strong teams and trusting them

Advertisement

The same applies to patience. You have to learn to think in the long term if you really want success, and that was hard for me to begin with.

What defines your way of doing business?

I think it is probably “where there’s a will, there’s a way”. Nothing is unattainable if you have enough determination. But it helps if you also have integrity, long-term thinking, innovation and relationships.

Integrity is the foundation of trust, and you cannot succeed without it. Long-term thinking is equally important. It took a while for me to learn this, but you cannot be driven solely by short-term results.

That said, you cannot stand still either, and that is where innovation comes in. Markets change, technologies advance and customer expectations evolve, and you have to keep pace with that.

Advertisement

Finally, relationships are central to everything I do. Strong relationships build trust, foster collaboration and create opportunities. I have always believed in treating people with respect and fairness.

What advice would you give to someone starting out?

The first thing I would say is be ready to work hard. There is no substitute for effort.

Second, never stop learning. Things change so quickly in business, and you cannot afford to fall behind. So read widely, seek advice and stay curious.

I would also say do not fear failure. We learn from mistakes, and what matters is how you respond to them.

Advertisement

Then there is the value of relationships. Networks are not there for personal gain alone; they are built through genuine engagement, mutual respect and trust. But if you put in the effort, the people you know can become invaluable.

Integrity is also important. Protecting your reputation and your principles should always be a priority.

Lastly, think about the future. Legacy seems a long way off when you are just starting out, but your business should mean something more than your personal ability to make money. Aim for something bigger. If you can make a positive difference, you will be much more likely to achieve lasting success.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Business

Unleashing Urban Productivity: How Thai Cities Can Drive High-Income Growth

Published

on

Bangkok's ultra-wealthy population boom - Thailand Business News

The World Bank urges Thailand to raise Bangkok’s productivity and strengthen secondary cities to boost investment, jobs, and national resilience. Thailand can accelerate its transition to a high-income economy if it unleashes the full productive potential of its cities, according to a new World Bank report.

Key Takeaways

  • The World Bank report Thailand Cities of the Future highlights that unleashing urban productivity is essential for Thailand to achieve high-income status by 2037.
  • Bangkok currently drives nearly half of the national output but faces mounting challenges from congestion, climate risks, and high urban costs.
  • To ensure sustainable growth, Thailand must complement Bangkok’s economic anchor role by strategically investing in secondary cities, improving infrastructure, and fostering better coordination between local and national governments

The study Thailand Cities of the Future: Urban Foundations for a High-Income Economy argues that the country’s economic growth is already concentrated in urban areas and that improving their productivity will be essential to meet the goal of achieving high-income economy status by 2037. According to the paper, about 89% of gross domestic product growth recorded between 2010 and 2020 came from urban districts. However, the country will need an annual per capita GDP growth of approximately 5.4% over the next decade to close the gap and reach its high-income target.

“Building Thailand’s cities of the future is not simply an urban planning agenda. It is an agenda for growth, competitiveness, jobs, and resilience,” said Stephen N. Ndegwa, World Bank Country Director for Thailand and Myanmar. The report suggests that Bangkok must continue to function as the main national economic anchor, but argues that secondary cities need to take on more relevant and complementary roles. The goal would not be to displace the capital, but to build a more balanced urban network.

Bangkok concentrates the economy

The capital generates nearly half of the national output and is almost 27 times larger than Chiang Mai, the country’s second city. This concentration has favored Thailand’s economic development, but has also created ever-increasing costs. Congestion accounts for between 7% and 10% of Bangkok’s gross regional product every year. At the same time, climate risks, pressure on infrastructure, and rising housing costs complicate the capital’s ability to maintain its pace of expansion.

The World Bank believes the question is no longer choosing between Bangkok and secondary cities. The priority is to establish a more efficient economic division: a productive and connected capital, supported by cities with their own specializations, better infrastructure, and the capacity to attract investment.

Advertisement

The report warns that many Thai cities have not yet reached the scale or productivity needed to become regional engines of growth. The problem is not limited to a lack of infrastructure. It also includes fragmented planning, weak coordination among agencies, and funding that does not always match the economic strengths of each territory.

The World Bank proposes concentrating investments in places where they can reinforce each other. A city with tourism potential, for example, not only needs new roads or airports. It also requires digital services, urban management, workforce training, climate resilience, and efficient connections with suppliers and markets.

“The key is to invest more strategically,” said Poon Thiengburanathum, Deputy Director of Strategic Planning and Management of the Program Management Unit for Area-Based Development.

The institutional challenge

Urban transformation will also depend on the ability of local and national governments to work in a coordinated manner. A city may receive new infrastructure and still fail to generate growth if it lacks planning, talent, efficient transportation, or institutions capable of executing projects.

Advertisement

The report was prepared by the World Bank together with the Program Management Unit on Area-Based Development and the Urban Design and Development Center. The study gathers international, national, and local knowledge on the challenges and opportunities of Thai urban development.

Bangkok will remain indispensable, but its size no longer guarantees a limitless advantage. Congestion, climate, and urban costs are turning economic concentration into a vulnerability. The alternative proposed by the World Bank is not to abandon the capital, but to build a network capable of making Chiang Mai and other cities play stronger economic roles.

For Thailand, the 2037 goal will depend less on a single megacity and more on the ability to connect urban centers with clear objectives, coordinated investments, and differentiated economic responsibilities. If the country succeeds in doing so, its cities could become the engine of a high-income economy. If not, Bangkok’s congestion and the untapped potential of secondary cities will continue to be a drag on the next phase of development.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Sebi approves new rules to widen investment avenues

Published

on

Sebi approves new rules to widen investment avenues
Mumbai: The Sebi board on Thursday approved new regulations for portfolio managers, allowing investment in foreign securities, and a revamped settlement framework, while permitting foreign portfolio investors to participate in a wider range of exchange-traded commodity derivatives.

Under the new rules, the regulator would be introducing a portfolio manager route for investing in mutual fund units, enabling portfolio managers to invest clients’ funds in direct plans of mutual funds, including ETFs, index funds and specialised investment funds. The minimum ticket size would be ₹25 lakh, while fixed management fees would be capped at 1% of client assets under management(AUM).

“The introduction of PRIM – allowing portfolio managers to offer mutual fund and SIF-based strategies – meaningfully widens access and brings more investors into a well-regulated, professionally managed framework,” said Vikas Khemani, founder, Carnelian Asset Managment.

Read more: Sebi clears PRIM route for PMS players to invest in mutual funds, SIFs; Rs 25 lakh minimum ticket

The regulator would also allow portfolio managers to invest in initial public offerings and primary issuances in the debt market. They would also be allowed to invest up to 10% of a client’s AUM in investment grade, non-convertible unlisted debt securities under discretionary PMS(portfolio management services).

Advertisement


Vikas Khemani said this gives managers flexibility to construct better risk- adjusted portfolios.
The framework provides greater flexibility for investment in exchange-traded derivatives, allowing exposure of up to 1.25 times the client’s AUM. It also permits investment in foreign securities under discretionary and non-discretionary PMS, including listed equity and debt, REITs, overseas mutual funds, exchange-traded funds, index funds and foreign government debt.Anshul Sharan, co-founder and chief executive of Ametra PMS said, the expanded investment universe would significantly broaden the reach of PMS.

Read more: Sebi board approves FPI play in non-agri commodity derivatives, expands scope of PMS

The new PMS framework also introduces independent fund managers who can manage client portfolios in association with registered portfolio managers. The registered portfolio manager will retain full responsibility and liability for the activities of the independent fund manager.

Aditya Agarwal, co- founder of Wealthy.in, a wealth management platform said, the new avenues would open up a wider set of people being able to offer fee based management of fund portfolios which was previously available only to investment advisers.

The Sebi board also approved significant changes to the Settlement Regulations, introducing a formula-based approach to settlement amounts, comprising a base amount linked to the minimum penalty prescribed under securities laws, adjusted for factors including the stage of proceedings, regulatory action, gravity, aggravating and mitigating circumstances, along with legal costs.

Advertisement

The framework expands access to settlement by introducing a settlement notice before a show-cause notice, giving entities 60 days to apply, while the period for filing an application after a show-cause notice has been increased from 60 to 90 days. It also introduces a fast-track route for certain cases, including those where the settlement amount does not exceed ₹10 lakh.

The new rules provide for settlement of cases involving misrepresentation of financial statements and diversion or siphoning of funds, subject to appropriate remedial and regulatory terms, including disclosures and bringing back diverted funds.

“In the recent past, there has been significant concern that settlements involving technical and minor violations resulted in large settlement amounts, causing such settlements to fail,” said Tomu Francis, partner, Khaitan & Co.

“If this issue is addressed, as appears to be the intent of Sebi, we could see a significant increase in the number of settlements. This, in turn, would help free up the bandwidth of adjudicating officers to focus on more important matters,” Francis said.

Advertisement

Sebi also approved wider participation by FPIs (foreign portfolio investors) in exchange-traded commodity derivatives. FPIs would be permitted to trade in non-agricultural index derivatives, irrespective of whether the underlying is cash-settled, as well as non-cash-settled non-agricultural commodity derivatives.

Add ET Logo as a Reliable and Trusted News Source

Continue Reading

Business

Satterley appoints Ben Rosser, restructures

Published

on

Satterley appoints Ben Rosser, restructures

The West Perth-based land developer is making some changes at the top of its business as it continues its expansion into commercial property.

Continue Reading

Business

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM) Discusses Landmark Multi-Billion Dollar Cloud Infrastructure Contract and Impact on Business Growth Transcript

Published

on

OneWater Marine Inc. (ONEW) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript