Tech
Leaks Show That Meta’s New AI Agent Relied on Real People to Make Calls
To quote George Santayana, “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” So why does it so often feel like Big Tech has such a short memory?
The latest hiccup comes from Meta. In mid-September, it rolled out a beta test of a feature for its brand-new Muse AI agent that would place calls to businesses to complete tasks for you, like making reservations and appointments.
According to reports by Reuters and 404 Media on Tuesday, however, this allegedly autonomous agent could route these tasks to a trained human concierge in call centers — without disclosing it was doing so in advance.
On Sept. 16, Principal Engineer Ryan Fox at Meta’s Superintelligence Labs, announced the beta release of Muse’s outbound call feature and posted a request on X for feedback, noting that “phone calling” was one of the top requests from users.
But 404 Media says that, based on internal Facebook records, the company was doing something entirely behind the scenes with its personal assistant. When announcing the features to employees internally, the tech giant said that it “added a human agent layer for calls to get completed,” referring to them as “Muse human agent calls.”
Some Meta employees complained, including one who posted internally: “This has potential for so much negative PR. It could portray us as ‘their AI is not good enough so they still need humans’ kind of coverage for this launch.”
The truth is rarely pure…
The problem with the added human meat layer isn’t just the AI-washing of Muse’s capabilities. Nor is it purely the deception of failing to disclose that there could be a human link in the chain. Some agentic systems introduce human oversight as a “human in the loop” for safety and compliance.
It’s unclear how much safety and compliance were on the menu for Meta. But employees raised a bigger concern over privacy, with one warning (per Reuters), “We are one bug away from unnecessary information being leaked to human callers.” And bugs there are.
You generally sacrifice privacy when you use AI agents to perform personal tasks, like making a reservation, a purchase or a medical appointment. But it can feel a lot worse if you discover you’ve just had a complete stranger book your STI test.
It’s also a black box. You don’t know what context that person’s been given, if they’ve seen your chat or know where you live and how to contact you because of it. Even more data might be on offer, given that the company’s glasses are chock-full of Muse.
You’re also providing the so-called autonomous agent (in this case, a human contractor in an undisclosed call center) with sensitive information, such as a phone number, patient ID or banking information.
It’s all part of a growing trend of granting AI models the power to perform tasks as personal assistants. Just this week, Google introduced the capability of its Gemini agent to handle everyday phone calls. That implementation turns over the transactional part of a call — like providing credit card info — back to you. But the risks are still there.
…And never simple
The kicker is that Meta has broken privacy trust many times before. In 2019, Facebook had to stop a program that used contractors to listen to and transcribe Messenger calls.
Because AI agents like these frequently require human intervention to verify that they’re delivering the desired results, a mistaken incident of the “Oh, this employee saw this” variety seems inevitable.
Potemkin AI, where a hidden army of human workers does some of the actual work of models behind the curtain, isn’t confined to calls. In February, it was revealed that Waymo had remote operators supplementing autonomous car operations overseas.
And once again, the rollout of Meta Muse’s outbound call feature has been rolled back. Reuters reported that the company temporarily suspended the feature after a vice president in Meta’s Superintelligence Labs unit admitted “it was a miss” to begin testing the feature without adequate disclosures of the human contractors involved.
Of course, the real fault isn’t a bad memory so much as Big Tech’s history of “do bad, get caught, apologize, roll back, maybe pay a negligible fine. Rinse, repeat.” At some point, after we’ve collectively become exhausted, the cycle is reduced to “do bad, but profit anyway.”
We reached out to Meta for comment and clarification, but didn’t immediately hear back.
Tech
Meta Made 43M Misleading Statements, New Mexico Jury Finds, Including on Its Cambridge Analytica Response
A New Mexico jury on Friday “found Facebook liable for deceiving users” about its privacy protections, reports the Associated Press.
A New Mexico newspaper calls it “another massive legal victory” against Facebook, reporting that the jury found Facebook “had committed tens of millions of violations of the state’s Unfair Practices Act in connection with its lies to consumers about how their personal information was handled by the company and third-party users.”
The state has asked the company be ordered to pay the maximum civil penalty of $5,000 per violation meaning a judge could potentially order the company to pay billions in penalties to the state. The jury also found the company had been dishonest about its investigation of and response to the 2013 Cambridge Analytica data breach scandal, in which approximately 300,000 Facebook users took an online personality quiz, only to have the app that hosted the quiz harvest data from tens of millions of their “friends.” The data was then transferred to the British consulting firm, which used it to create targeted political ads during the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
More details from Reuters:
The verdict followed a two-week trial over a lawsuit filed by New Mexico’s attorney general in 2021, three years after news reports revealed that the firm, Cambridge Analytica, had harvested personal data from as many as 87 million Facebook users through a third-party app… At a press conference after the verdict was announced, New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez said the case revealed “in stark detail the way in which this company plays fast and loose with the rules.”
Jurors found 26 of 29 statements identified by the state were misleading, including comments about user data… Judge Francis Mathew will now determine civil penalties after jurors found more than 43 million violations, based on the number of people affected by the company’s misleading statements… [New Mexico Attorney General] Torrez said his office is evaluating how much to seek but will push for the maximum penalty based on the jury’s findings. The state will also ask [Judge] Mathew to direct Meta to make changes, which could include corrections to its past misstatements as well as an audit of the way it manages user data, Torrez said.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Child predators are arguably the most reviled demographic in society.
So when someone like Chris Hansen, the former NBC Dateline journalist and host of the To Catch a Predator series, decides to take up the mantle of exposing them to the public, he is naturally praised as a hero.
But, as is revealed in Lance Oppenheim’s Primetime—a dramatized snapshot of Hansen’s life at the show’s peak—it’s not as simple as that. Exposing allegedly bad people for public entertainment brings up a lot of ethical concerns and unintended consequences. And while many of the vigilantes carrying out these sting operations claim they are doing a public service, their motivations become a lot more suspect when fame and money are involved.
To Catch a Predator launched in 2004. In the show, Hansen’s team would pair up with civilian watchdog group Perverted Justice, using adult “decoys” to pose as minors online and exchange messages with men in chatrooms and private DMs. After the conversations became sexual, the crew would set up a sting, inviting these men to a home to meet the decoy, only to have Hansen confront them, uttering his catchphrase, “Have a seat.” The men were technically free to leave instead of sitting for an on-camera interview, but often police were waiting outside to arrest them.
The show developed an intense fandom that remains active to this day in subreddits like r/tcap, which has 52,000 weekly visitors, despite the fact that NBC stopped airing the original series in 2007.
In A24’s Primetime, a darkly told character study in theaters September 25, Hansen (Robert Pattinson) clearly enjoys the praise and seems desperate for more accolades. He brags to his two young sons that he’s about to be on prime-time television, despite them not understanding the importance of that, and complains that the show has “never won an Emmy or any of the significance it deserves.” When a fan recognizes Hansen on a flight and becomes bloodthirsty, asking the TV host if he ever wants to “bleed” the predators he’s outing, Hansen smiles and admits that what he does by disgracing them on national television is “a little worse.”
In real life, Hansen cofounded the streaming service Trublu in November 2022, where he continues his investigations into alleged child predators. But these days, he’s far from alone. His work has inspired copycats, who thrive on social media and streaming platforms like YouTube, Kick, and Facebook. These groups and individuals are largely disorganized, and as such, hard to track, but a 2022 Washington Post investigation identified at least 160 in the US. Arguably, the people running these operations are more reckless, in part because they’re driven by virality.
One of them, who goes by Skeet Hansen, was featured in the 2025 MTV documentary Predators, about the Dateline show. In the film, directed by David Osit, Skeet Hansen responds to the criticism of the movement by saying, “There’s never been a detective that solved a murder that didn’t get paid for it. So why shouldn’t I be able to monetize off of catching these guys like the original show and making this content for people’s entertainment?”
One of many issues with that argument is that these hunters aren’t professional investigators—and sometimes they get things wrong.
In April, YouTuber and Kick streamer Vitaly Zdorovetskiy apologized after publicly—and wrongly— accosting a man of Indian descent. He accused the man of wanting to “rape a 16-year-old” in a mock Indian accent and called him “Mr. Mumbai.” In March 2025, The New York Times reported that Zdorovetskiy’s tactics for ambushing suspected creeps included beating some of them up, dressing like the Joker; the Times piece found that there have been more than 170 violent vigilante attacks by predator-hunting groups since 2023.
Apple’s diminutive speaker is returning for a second generation, sporting the same spherical design in a few new colors.
The upcoming HomePod mini lineup swaps the current-gen yellow and orange for a new powder pink and forest green. Blue, black, and white will be making a return, though.
The information originates from Apple’s code, spotted by MacRumors contributor Aaron Perris. It showcases the product in the aforementioned colors.
Apple has yet to announce the HomePod mini 2. However, the images in the code suggest a release could be coming soon.
The first-generation HomePod mini made its debut in October 2020. Shortly after, Apple retired the full-sized, first-generation HomePod.
Apple allowed the HomePod mini to carry the lineup for nearly two full years. In January 2023, it released a second-generation full-sized HomePod.
If you worry AI could eventually make your Walmart bill depend on who you are, or charge you more than the shopper next to you, Walmart wants to clear that up. CEO John Furner says Walmart will not use personal information to set different prices for individual shoppers.
What is Walmart promising about AI pricing?
Furner made three commitments in an open letter:
- First, your income, shopping history, urgency, or what Walmart thinks you can afford won’t change what you pay, and neither will the time of day.
- Second, Sparky, Walmart’s AI shopping assistant, won’t use what you tell it to raise your price or hide cheaper options.
- Third, you decide how much personal information to share, and Walmart says it will be clear about how that data is used.
The prices can still rise when items cost more to buy or ship. Furner also defended the digital shelf labels spreading across Walmart’s 4,600 stores, saying they keep shelf prices accurate while saving employees time previously spent replacing paper tags. Walmart adds that the labels have no cameras, microphones, or facial recognition.
RELATED COVERAGE:
Why is Walmart saying this now?
The pledge comes as regulators and lawmakers examine how personal data could influence pricing. The letter arrived the same day public comments were due on a proposed Federal Trade Commission policy. It warns that businesses may be breaking the law if they don’t explain how personal data shapes prices. The concerns aren’t hypothetical either, as Instacart’s AI pricing tests showed.
Lawmakers from both parties are also pressing retailers, and Rep. Frank Pallone sent pricing questions to 25 companies, including Walmart. Meanwhile, Financial Times reported that Walmart received two patents this year for automated pricing tools. One described using data like payment methods and even ID numbers to recommend prices.
Furner says people will keep overseeing pricing, and Walmart will test its tech against these promises. For now, the bottomline is that AI can personalize your experience, but your data will not become a reason to charge you more.
People have been using coal to generate heat and power for centuries, but these days, some see it as an antiquated and dirty means of energy production. That doesn’t mean that there aren’t any coal power plants, as they outnumber nuclear power plants by a lot. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, there are 219 operational coal power plants in the nation, while there are only 57 nuclear power plants with 96 nuclear reactors. That might suggest that coal plants are more efficient at producing energy than nuclear plants, but that’s not the case.
Those 219 coal power plants generate 199,952 megawatts of energy, which is more than the 103,581 megawatts generated by the 57 nuclear power plants. Of course, if the country swapped out its coal plants for nuclear ones, the total energy production would reach almost 400,000 megawatts. Unfortunately, it’s not as simple as demolishing a coal power plant and building a nuclear power plant in its place. Because of their complexity, nuclear power plants take a long time to build, so it can take years before they become operational. So, while nuclear energy production far exceeds the capabilities of coal energy production (and there are several reasons why) right now coal is the leader.
Coal is not an efficient energy source, as we can only harvest around 33% of coal’s stored energy during energy production, while 66% is lost to waste heat. Conversely, clean nuclear energy is remarkably more efficient, as converting fissile materials into electricity uses 92% of the fuel, far exceeding coal’s efficiency as the most efficient energy production method currently in use, including solar and wind.
Nuclear produces far more energy than coal
There are different types of nuclear power plants around the world, but generally, each one produces 1 gigawatt per hour of electricity. That’s enough energy to power 876,000 homes for a year. Coal power plants also vary in size and capacity, but on average, you can expect to produce about 380 megawatts. While it might seem simple to replace a nuclear power plant with three average-sized coal power plants, it’s not that easy. For one, both types of plants require fuel in order to function. This requires mining operations, which are dangerous and expensive.
Coal plants use coal — it’s in the name — while nuclear plants utilize enriched uranium-235 to produce energy. The main difference between coal and U-235 is the amount needed to power each plant. Coal plants in the U.S. burn through 1.1 billion tons of coal annually, and it’s not a renewable energy source. Once humanity uses it up, it’s gone for good.
Nuclear power plants function differently, requiring refueling once every 1.5 to 2 years. U.S. nuclear power plants purchased 21,000 tons of uranium in 2025, so while it’s far below what’s required for coal plants, it’s still a lot of material. Ultimately, determining which is better largely comes down to efficiency, and nuclear energy far surpasses what coal can provide. In comparing the two, it’s really no contest because 92% efficiency far exceeds 33%, not to mention total energy output and the amount of material required, which are also in nuclear energy’s favor.
Peter Thiel has called Pope Leo XIV a “useful idiot” for the Chinese Communist Party over the pope’s call to regulate AI. The PayPal and Palantir co-founder spoke to Axel Springer chief executive Mathias Döpfner on the MD Meets podcast, released on Thursday.
The interview came before Thiel received the Axel Springer Award in Berlin on Thursday. Axel Springer owns Politico, which reported the remarks first, and Business Insider. Fortune reported on his comments about Germany.
“The Communist Party of China is not going to listen to the pope. There’s a chance people in the U.S. will. And so in effect, the Pope’s encyclical was working for the Communist party,” Thiel said.
“I’m not saying he was an agent of the communists, but he was at least acting as a useful idiot for the CCP,” he added.
The encyclical
Pope Leo published his first encyclical, Magnifica Humanitas, in May. In it, he called on world leaders to regulate AI. Thiel argued that the text would do nothing to slow China, Politico reported. Instead, it could lead the US and its allies to impose heavy rules on AI, he said.
The Vatican did not respond to requests for comment from Politico or Business Insider. The Vatican has since expanded its AI campaign with an AI4Peace association.
It is not the first time Thiel has attacked the pope over AI. Speaking in Colorado in July, he said the pope was acting as a “Chinese communist agent” by calling for regulation, Politico reported.
‘What we’re doing to ourselves’
Thiel also said Americans themselves, not China, are mostly to blame for the growing US backlash against AI. He was “inclined to believe” China could be fuelling some anti-AI content, he said. But China was not the main force behind the shift.
“This is mainly what we’re doing to ourselves. It’s often somewhat too easy to simply blame it on China,” Thiel said.
Germany’s ‘fear of success’
Thiel, who was born in Frankfurt, also criticised German entrepreneurs. German founders tend to sell their companies before they grow into global businesses, he said.
“If you have something that works, you’re not going to scale it to this extreme degree like an Elon Musk or Mark Zuckerberg,” he said.
Among the richest Germans of Generation X or younger, all had inherited their wealth, Thiel said. In the US, most had built it themselves.
Thiel is a partner at Founders Fund, which has invested in OpenAI, Palantir and Scale AI, among other AI companies.
from the ctrl-alt-speech dept
Ctrl-Alt-Speech is a weekly podcast about the latest news in online speech, from Mike Masnick and Everything in Moderation‘s Ben Whitelaw.
Subscribe now on Apple Podcasts, Overcast, Spotify, Pocket Casts, YouTube, or your podcast app of choice — or go straight to the RSS feed. To get extended episodes with additional coverage, support us on Patreon.
In this week’s episode, Mike and Ben cover:
And in the extended episode for Patreon supporters, they cover:
Our fun links this week include Jev, the super fast new AI classifier, and Persodex, the context layer for your Contacts (PS. hit Ben up if you’re in New York in mid-October).
Follow us on Instagram, YouTube, and Bluesky for video clips from this week’s episode!
If you’re already a Patreon supporter, you can get the extended episode on Patreon.
Filed Under: age verification, ai, artificial intelligence, content moderation, ofcom, trust and safety
Companies: aylo, discord, youtube
Can you visualize 100 feet in front of you? It’s about a third the length of a football field, or about seven to ten car lengths lined up bumper to bumper. If you’re behind the helm of a boat, you have to know how to picture it for the sake of the 100-feet rule, a boating safety regulation that puts a limit on how fast your boat can travel around people, property, other boats, or the shoreline.
The exact wording and distance requirements tend to vary from state to state, but the basic idea is the same in every body of water in America: If you’re passing through a designated area or maneuvering around certain obstacles or people, you have to reduce your speed. It’s about going beyond the rules of no wake zones to prevent collisions, avoid damaging wakes, and ultimately keep people safe out there on the water. A boat moving too fast through a confined area or around other boats or swimmers can create a dangerous wake, even if boat itself never even came close to hitting anything.
Different states have different distance laws
Some states take the 100-feet rule even further. Georgia, for example, says wakesurfers and wakeboarders have to stay 200 feet away from structures, vessels, and swimmers; that’s in addition to the 100-feet rule for boats. Michigan has something similar, enforcing the 100-feet rule as well as a 200-feet rule for personal watercraft (or PWC), a 500-feet rule for wakeboarders, and a 150-feet rule for crossing behind other vessels (regardless of if they’re towing or not). Missouri is especially strict with a 50-feet rule around any vessel or person on/in the water.
It might sound like a lot to keep track of, but the fact remains: If you’re going to take a boat out on the water, it’s your responsibility to make sure you know the laws. Boats don’t have brakes, so it’s really in the operator’s best interest to go above and beyond the 100-feet rule whenever possible. Not to mention, most people tend to drive their boat less than they drive their car, so reaction times are likely going to be slower. Cars have the the 3-second rule, but boats don’t, so it’s in your best interest to regard the 100-feet rule as a minimum, not a maximum.
Bose has recently unveiled the Open Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen), and we’re intrigued to see what’s really different with the buds.
Although we’re yet to review the second gen pair, we have compared its specs to the originals and noted the key differences – plus any noteworthy similarities – between the two below.
Read on to see what separates the Open Ultra Earbuds 2nd Gen from the Open Ultra Earbuds. When you’re done here, visit our round-up of the best wireless earbuds and best open headphones too.
Or if you want more from Bose’s recent launch, check out our Bose Sport Open Earbuds vs Sport Earbuds too.
Price and Availability
The Bose Open Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen) will be available to buy from October 1st, and have an RRP of $299 / £299.95. At the time of writing, if you register with MyBose then you’ll be able to pre-order the buds to secure them for launch.
The 2nd Gen pair will be available in three colours, including Cherry Chocolate, Olive Green and Sky Pink.
Although the Bose Open Ultra Earbuds currently carry the same £299.95 RRP as the upcoming second generation, we do expect this price to drop in the coming months. In addition, as it’s an older generation, it has also been possible to pick up the buds for a deal too.
Both share the same open design, but the 2nd Gens have been tweaked
We’ll start with one of the most obvious similarities between the two: both have an open-ear design and deliver sound through the air near your ear rather than through bone vibrations, like other bone conduction headphones.
With this in mind, you shouldn’t expect either to be among the best noise cancelling headphones, as they are both designed to provide situational awareness. That means you can listen to your audio but without completely tuning out important sounds like public transport announcements.
Bose explains that the 2nd Gen is equipped with its OpenAudio and SoundDesign technology that promises to deliver rich and personal sound, while ensuring clarity is balanced too. In addition, thanks to a transducer and tightly controlled acoustic structure, the 2nd Gens promise minimal sound leakage too.
As we found the original Open Ultra Earbuds never struggled with sound leakage, even at higher volumes, we’re hopeful that the 2nd Gen pair will be just as reliable.
Bose Open Ultra Earbuds 2nd Gen promises longer battery
Although the Open Ultra Earbuds offered a solid battery life, with 7.5 from the buds and an additional 19.5 hours within the charging case, Bose has managed to eke out a few extra hours with the 2nd Gen.
In fact, although it shares the same 19.5 hours within the redesigned charging case (though more on that later), the buds promise to deliver up to nine hours of playback on a single charge too.
Bose Open Ultra Earbuds 2nd Gen introduces Cinema Mode
Bose has introduced Cinema Mode with the Open Ultra Earbuds 2nd Gen. Powered by Bose’s True Spatial technology, Cinema Mode is designed to create a wider and more immersive soundstage, with a “theatre-like” listening experience. As we haven’t reviewed the 2nd Gen pair yet, we can’t verify how well Cinema Mode really works. However, considering the buds are open ears, we’re undoubtedly intrigued to see how they manage to create an immersive experience.
Bose Open Ultra Earbuds 2nd Gen has an upgraded case
It’s not just the buds that have seen a refinement, but their accompanying charging case. Compared to the original pair, the 2nd Gen’s case has been redesigned and can stand upright too. In addition, the case now supports wireless charging too – although we don’t currently know how fast the speeds will be.
We should note that you can buy the original Open Ultra Earbuds with a charging case, however this is an extra cost of £49.95.
The 2nd Gen will offer Google Find Hub and Alexa+ support
Bose is planning a firmware update once the 2nd Gen pair have launched, which will introduce a range of new features.
Included among these features is Google Find Hub, which helps you locate the earbuds if they’re misplaced – much like Apple’s Find My. In addition, the 2nd Gen will support Alexa+, the latest version of Amazon’s voice assistant.
Early Verdict
The Bose Ultra Open Earbuds (2nd Gen) look like a solid upgrade from the Ultra Open Earbuds, thanks to a refined design, wireless charging case with no extra cost and the intriguing inclusion of Cinema Mode.
That’s not to say the Bose Ultra Open Earbuds aren’t a solid option. In fact, we hailed the buds as being “one of the best examples of the open-headphone concept” even two years after launch. With that in mind, if you’re sporting the 2024 pair or just want a more affordable option, then the Bose Ultra Open Earbuds remain a brilliant option.
This past April, while attending his nephew’s bar mitzvah on Cape Cod, Eric Umansky woke up to an inbox full of emails from people from his past. They all wanted to know the same thing: Was he actually throwing a party Saturday night?
The New York–based journalist wasn’t sure what party they were referring to, or why random acquaintances he’d met in passing 15 years ago were emailing him. On deadline and already stressed about work, he checked his phone, where more messages inquired about a supposed Paperless Post invite he’d sent for a “Special Private Dinner Party” at 7 pm on May 2.
Except Umansky hadn’t sent the invite, and he wasn’t planning to host a party anytime soon.
As it turned out, he was an early victim of an email scam that has since become more widespread. What Umansky didn’t expect was the positive effect it would have on his social life.
In May, after receiving increased reports, the Federal Trade Commission issued a consumer alert warning about scammers sending “unexpected messages that look like they’re from well-known invitation platforms like Evite or Paperless Post,” noting how some messages “make you enter your email username and password to see event details” while others “tell you to enter a phone number and share a special code to RSVP.”
Umansky wasn’t sure how it happened; he thought he’d taken the necessary precautions to safeguard his email, including using two-factor authentication. All he could think to do was post a message on Facebook, LinkedIn, and his other social networks to notify people that he was, in fact, not having a party and, more importantly, “don’t come to my house.”
Phishing scams, which have proliferated across the last two decades, remain one of the biggest security risks faced both by individuals and companies. Email scams, in particular, can now be highly sophisticated, incorporating social engineering techniques like creating urgency or fear in a target and even leveraging the personal relationships between two people to manipulate a victim, what’s known as “spear phishing.” AI has only made those deceptions harder to weed out.
But in some recent cases, like Umansky’s, the fake party invite is having an unintended outcome: It is encouraging people to check in to see whether the message was actually real and, in doing so, has reignited dormant relationships.
“It was so striking to me after it happened that I actually had a thought that I was like, ‘Oh, is this a net positive?’” says Umansky, who over the last several months has reconnected with a handful of old friends and colleagues over lunch and via text. He recently spent an hour on Zoom with a former coworker who now lives in Mexico City. They hadn’t talked to each other in over a decade. “I was like, Oh, you know, I actually want to catch up with you about something. There was an idea I wanted to bat around with him, which we talked about for maybe 10 minutes. The rest of the time we talked about our lives.”
According to a 2024 study published in the scientific journal Communications Psychology examining social withdrawal, which surveyed 2,400 adults in the US, UK, and Canada, people are sometimes unwilling to contact old friends because they believe the other person won’t want to hear from them or they fear the interaction will be awkward. The research noted that “high priority placed on work and productivity in North America has led people to cut back on social connections and social time to meet increasing demands at work,” in addition to other life transitions, such as parenthood or moving to a new city.
Meta Made 43M Misleading Statements, New Mexico Jury Finds, Including on Its Cambridge Analytica Response
Solana’s 150-millisecond settlement upgrade reaches second public test network
Katie Holmes And Boyfriend Take Over Milan Fashion Week
-
Crypto World3 days agoGoldman Sachs and Deutsche Bank Agree: The S&P 500 Rally Isn't Over
-
Tech5 days agoResearchers escape OpenAI Codex sandbox to run commands on host
-
Fashion2 days ago8 iPhone Accessories That Add Personality
-
Crypto World5 days agoWho Needs CLARITY Anyway? ARB Could See 70X Increase: Hodler’s Digest
-
Tech6 days agoTrump suggests rebranding AI with a new name, says he’s also creating an AI Force
-
Business5 days agoAnalog Devices (ADI) Bets $1.35 Billion on Chips that Let Machines Think for Themselves
-
Crypto World3 days agoThis Bearish Netflix Stock Trade Can Cash In On Video Streaming Giant’s Woes
-
Crypto World5 days agoCoinbase, Robinhood, Circle Seen as Tokenized-Stock Winners
-
Crypto World4 days agoTrump-Xi Polymarket Odds for Handshake Hit 50%
-
Entertainment3 days agoThese 17 Fall Amazon Dresses Seriously Look Like Anthropologie
-
Tech5 days agoGoogle’s $899 Googlebook is a bet that you’ll buy a new laptop for Gemini
-
Crypto World2 days agoCrude Oil Prices Pressured by Diplomatic Hopes in the Middle East
-
Business3 days agoOil Price Today (September 23): Crude oil below $100 on hopes of US-Iran talks. What did Trump say?
-
Crypto World2 days agoBitcoin price tests $83,600 Supertrend support after $87K rejection
-
NewsBeat7 days agoEd Sheeran protegees Katseye UNFOLLOW star… days after Macklemore was dropped from his tour over Free Palestine remarks
-
Crypto World2 days agoBitcoin Threatens Sub-$84,000 Breakdown as Long Liquidations Spike
-
Crypto World4 days agoMeta Jumps 11% As Muse Shines and Investors Show an Appetite for Advancing AI
-
Crypto World3 days agoDid Jim Cramer Just Give GameStop Stock the Kiss of Death When He Said the Turnaround Is Working?
-
Crypto World5 days agoBitcoin price holds above $81K as key catalysts line up
-
Crypto World5 days agoARB Price Signals Spur Speculation of 70x Upside in Hodler Digest
You must be logged in to post a comment Login