Crypto World
MEXC account hack: How did a user lose $340K?
MEXC has said it resolved a dispute involving a user who reported losing roughly $340,000 after an attacker allegedly retained API access following an account takeover.
Summary
- MEXC says it reached agreement with the affected user and considers the matter fully resolved.
- The user says 322,110 USDT and 9.13 million ONE were withdrawn after account recovery procedures.
- MEXC documentation says frozen accounts invalidate associated API keys, raising questions about the reported API.
- The reported withdrawals began 27 minutes after a 24-hour security lock expired on September 27.
- MEXC has not publicly disclosed the settlement terms or confirmed whether the user received reimbursement.
Shuang Fei, the affected user, said 322,110 USDT and 9,133,999 ONE were withdrawn from the account between 04:12 and 04:25 Beijing time on September 27.
MEXC customer support later said the exchange had contacted the user and “successfully reached an agreement.” It described the matter as “fully resolved,” but did not disclose the terms, citing user privacy.
The exchange has not publicly stated whether the user was reimbursed, whether an API key initiated the withdrawals, or what happened to the reported stolen assets.
MEXC account hack began with a security reset
The reported incident began early on September 25 when Shuang Fei received an email stating that an application had been made to change the account’s linked email and remove Google Authenticator.
According to the user’s account, the request arrived at 03:10 Beijing time and was approved 10 minutes later. Shuang Fei said the application was unauthorized and claimed the identification photograph and verification video submitted with it were not genuine materials provided by the account holder.
MEXC later told the user that the materials had initially met its requirements, according to screenshots shared in the thread. During a subsequent review, the exchange detected risk, froze the account and restored the original email address, the user said.
MEXC’s current security reset documentation states that users may be asked to provide account information, identity documents and a video holding their identification when resetting security verification.
Once the attacker controlled the account, Shuang Fei said the password was reset and a new Google Authenticator was linked. Login records shared by the user showed access from an IP address associated with Jakarta, Indonesia.
At 05:05:42, an API was created, according to the user’s account. Shuang Fei said MEXC only disclosed the existence of that API after the funds had already left the account.
Account recovery did not address the reported API
MEXC froze the account at approximately 10:55 on September 25 after its review detected suspicious activity, the user said.
Shuang Fei regained control over the following day by removing the attacker’s Google Authenticator, changing the password and linking a new authenticator. The final change was completed at 03:45:07 on September 26.
MEXC documentation confirms that cryptocurrency and fiat withdrawals are blocked for 24 hours after certain security changes, including modifications to a linked email or Google Authenticator.
A separate MEXC account guide states that freezing an account disables trading and login functions and makes “all API keys associated with your account” invalid.
The user has questioned how the reported API could later have been used if it had become invalid during the account freeze.
“Did this API become invalid at that time?” Shuang Fei asked. The user separately questioned whether it became active again after the account was restored.
MEXC has not publicly answered those technical questions.
$340K left shortly after the withdrawal lock expired
At 04:12:45 on September 27, roughly 27 minutes after the user’s 24-hour withdrawal restriction ended, the first reported outgoing transaction moved 1 USDT.
Five more withdrawals followed within roughly 13 minutes, according to Shuang Fei. The transfers eventually removed 322,110 USDT and 9,133,999 ONE, which the user valued at approximately $340,000.
No fresh login appeared in the account’s login history during those withdrawals, the user claimed.
Security monitoring service CertiK subsequently reported the user’s account of the incident, including the allegation that an attacker-created API remained available and was connected to the withdrawals. CertiK did not independently establish the attack method in its brief notice.
Lookonchain likewise reported the claims and noted that the account showed no new login activity during the withdrawal period.
MEXC completed an initial investigation and offered what it called corresponding solutions, according to an earlier public response reported by BlockBeats. The exchange later said an agreement had been reached with the user.
MEXC API rules allowed withdrawals without a default whitelist
MEXC’s API withdrawal policy provides further context for the user’s questions. In a 2023 announcement, the exchange said withdrawal whitelists would not be enabled by default for API withdrawals, allowing withdrawals to any address unless a whitelist was activated.
The exchange advised API users to enable withdrawal whitelists and avoid disclosing API keys.
Current withdrawal documentation states that normal withdrawals may require email, mobile or Google Authenticator verification, while separate security settings can permit withdrawals under specified conditions without repeated two-factor authentication.
Shuang Fei said the attacker-created API was not visible in the security-operation history available to the user and claimed no notification was received because the account email had already been changed when the API was created.
The user asked MEXC to disclose the IP address used to create the API, its permissions, whether it became invalid while the account was frozen, and which channel initiated the six withdrawals.
The episode follows earlier scrutiny of MEXC’s account controls. In 2025, the exchange returned funds after a separate MEXC $3.15 million frozen-funds dispute involving trader The White Whale.
MEXC has since promoted several user-protection measures, including a planned $500 million Guardian Fund expansion announced in May 2026.
For the current case, MEXC’s public response remains limited. Customer support said the dispute has been resolved and that further details will not be disclosed because of user privacy.
Crypto World
AI agents could drain cheap bank deposits, Apollo’s Torsten Slok warns
“If every household used AI agents to optimize the return on their cash balances, banks could lose a large share of the cheap deposits they rely on to make loans, which would be a problem for the entire financial system,” he noted.
Agentic finance refers to AI that acts rather than just answers. These agents can monitor balances in real time, compare returns across institutions, move idle cash into higher-yield accounts and move it back in time for bills.
Estimates of the market’s size vary widely. Mordor Intelligence puts agentic AI in financial services at $7.78 billion in 2026 and projects $43.52 billion by 2031. MarketsandMarkets sizes the narrower AI agents segment at about $845 million in 2025.
Crypto is already building the payment rails these agents would need. Coinbase’s x402 protocol, the most widely used agentic payment standard, lets an AI agent pay for online services in stablecoins within seconds, with no account, card or human approval.
To date, the x402 Protocol has reportedly processed approximately 188 million to over 205 million cumulative transactions, with around 69,000 active agents.
Cloudflare, Google, Visa, Mastercard, AWS, Circle and Stripe have joined the x402 Foundation, which the Linux Foundation now governs.
Nate Geraci, co-founder of the ETF Institute, has previously said that AI and crypto are both coming for the traditional banking model.
Crypto World
Bitcoin eases into the week as traders watch BTC’s $85k resistance – CoinJournal
Key takeaways
- Bitcoin traded below $83,000 on Monday after gaining more than 4% last week.
- Ethereum slipped below $2,700, while XRP consolidated around $1.500.
- BTC remains above its 50-day, 100-day, and 200-day exponential moving averages.
Bitcoin, Ethereum, and XRP began the week on a quieter note after last week’s gains. Bitcoin pulled back below $83,100 on Monday, Ethereum traded below $2,700, and XRP hovered around $1.500.
The moves suggest traders are reassessing the market’s next direction following its recent advance.
Bitcoin’s technical picture remains constructive despite the dip. The largest cryptocurrency is holding above several closely watched moving averages, while its momentum indicators still lean positive.
The immediate question is whether buyers can carry BTC back toward $85,000 or whether the pause develops into a deeper pullback.
Bitcoin holds above key moving averages
Bitcoin was trading at $83,100 on Monday after rising more than 4% last week. Its retreat from recent highs has so far left the broader near-term uptrend intact: BTC remains above its 50-day, 100-day and 200-day exponential moving averages (EMAs).
The 50-day EMA stands at $77,323. The 100-day EMA is at $73,931, while the 200-day EMA is at $74,253.
Together, these levels form a series of potential support areas if selling pressure increases. Holding above them would suggest that the latest dip is a pause within the recent advance.
For now, BTC is trading well above that group of averages. That gives buyers room to absorb a modest pullback, although a drop toward the 50-day EMA would represent a more meaningful test of the rally than Monday’s move below $83,600.
The distinction matters after a strong week. A market can ease from its highs while retaining its upward trend, but repeated failures to recover may gradually weaken buyer confidence. Traders will therefore be watching both how far BTC falls and how quickly demand returns.
Momentum cools as $85,000 caps the upside
Bitcoin’s relative strength index (RSI) was near 61, a reading consistent with positive momentum. It remains below the level commonly associated with overbought conditions, leaving room for another rise if buyers regain control.
The moving average convergence divergence (MACD) indicator has cooled but remains slightly positive.
That combination points to an uptrend that is still present, though less forceful than during the recent rally. Momentum readings can change quickly, so price action around nearby resistance will offer a clearer test.
The first barrier is approximately $85,000. Bitcoin would need to overcome selling around that level to make a stronger case for extending last week’s gains. A failed attempt could keep BTC in a period of sideways trading as buyers and sellers weigh the recent move.
On the downside, the current price area provides the first place to look for support. A more substantial decline would put the 50-day EMA at $77,323 in focus, followed by the longer-term averages near $74,000. Previously established horizontal support levels at $66,500 and $62,300 sit further below.
These levels outline the range of possible tests rather than a forecast that BTC will reach them. For the near term, the contest is much narrower: whether Bitcoin can stabilize above $83,000 and make another attempt at $85,000.
Ethereum’s move below $2,700 and XRP’s consolidation around $1.500 add to the cautious start to the week.
Both assets are taking a breather alongside Bitcoin, although the figures provided do not establish equivalent support or resistance levels for either token.
For traders following the three largest cryptocurrencies, Bitcoin’s response to $85,000 may offer a useful gauge of broader market appetite.
A renewed push above that barrier could signal that buyers remain willing to pursue last week’s gains. Continued consolidation, meanwhile, would leave the market waiting for a clearer direction.
Crypto World
Strategy Buys $143M in Bitcoin, Holdings Hit 847,666 BTC

Strategy sold 1.47 million MSTR shares for $246.2 million, using the proceeds for Bitcoin purchases and STRC preferred stock repurchases.
Crypto World
THORChain rejects Bitget request to block hacker as $6 million moves to bitcoin
Crypto exchange Bitget lost about $388 million in a Sept. 24 breach after an attacker bypassed security controls protecting its exchange wallets. The company has since said it has identified and fixed the vulnerability, though it has not publicly detailed how the attacker gained access.
The exchange had published attacker addresses and offered a 5% bounty for eligible efforts that freeze or recover stolen funds. As the attacker moved those assets through other services, Bitget CEO Gracy Chen publicly asked THORChain over the weekend to refuse the transactions.
“Our attacker addresses are publicly listed and actively tracked. We are formally asking @THORChain to refuse service to these addresses,” she wrote on X. “Decentralization is a design principle, not a shield for facilitating known stolen funds.”
THORChain’s public response on Monday defended its policy of allowing anyone to use the network and distinguished its emergency shutdown controls from an address blocklist.
“A THORChain network halt is an emergency security mechanism designed to protect the protocol,” the project wrote. “A halt is not a selective freeze of specific funds or an individual swap.”
Its operators do have controls that can interrupt trading, the team said. THORChain’s documentation describes settings that stop swaps across every connected blockchain or restrict activity involving a particular chain, such as Ethereum. Using those controls would also interrupt other users’ transactions on the affected routes.
Crypto World
Bitcoin (BTC) traders aren’t panicking yet despite cooling sentiment: Crypto Daily
In plain English, puts are relatively pricier than calls, but the relatively richness is barely even noticeable compared to the typical reading of around -4.41 over the past year or so. In other words, puts usually cost a lot more than they do now.
The takeway, therefore, is that bitcoin traders are chasing puts they are not yet positioning for a crash or deep sell-off.
For ether, calls are still more expensive than puts, but the premium has narrowed from a week ago, suggesting that bullish sentiment has cooled.
10x Research also noted an uptick in demand for puts.
“Put demand has jumped over the past few days. The question is whether that is a short-term hedge or the start of a regime shift,” it said on X.
On bitcoin, they still see cheap options, not panic pricing.
“Implied vol is back near cycle lows while realized vol runs 12 points higher, and some Bitcoin options are now priced at 30 vol on a market moving at 42.” Essentially, bitcoin options are still cheap. Stay alert!
Read more: For analysis of today’s activity in altcoins and derivatives, see Crypto Markets Today . For a comprehensive list of events this week, see CoinDesk’s “Crypto Week Ahead.”
Crypto World
XRP Price Prediction: Peter Brandt Says XRP Charts Justify a Bet
XRP trades near $1.48, down by 3% over the past 24 hours, caught in a choppy range that has traders arguing about its price prediction and direction again. But Peter Brandt just gave the bulls something concrete to point to.
Brandt, a veteran chart technician with decades of market cycles behind him, told followers that XRP ownership doesn’t require “certified cult membership,” and an open read of the charts is reason enough. His long-term monthly chart, built on a decade of resistance-and-support structure, implies an eventual move to $5.40.
He was careful to separate the projection from an active trade call, a gap the market seemed to skip past. As of now, the post captured a community reaction split between validation and skepticism.
The timing lines up with whale accumulation of roughly 470 million tokens (about $724 million) over five days, plus a separate inverse head-and-shoulders pattern flagged near a $1.55 neckline. Crypto sentiment is also absorbing fallout from the Bitget security incident, which has kept volatility elevated across majors. That backdrop sets up the technical question every XRP holder is now asking.
Earn $50 and Enter $300K Prize Draw on EdgeX
XRP Price Prediction: Hit $2 This Week?
XRP’s seven-day range runs at $1.37 to $1.66, putting the token in what looks like volatile consolidation rather than a confirmed breakout. Current price action sits below the $1.60 resistance zone that’s capped multiple attempts this month. Volume has been unremarkable, suggesting conviction is still building rather than peaking.
The bull case: a close above $1.55 confirms the inverse head-and-shoulders neckline and opens a path toward $2, roughly 30% higher, with Brandt’s $5.40 target sitting far out on the horizon as a multi-year marker rather than a swing-trade level. The base case: XRP grinds inside the $1.47–$1.60 band while whales continue quietly stacking.
The bear case: a failure to hold $1.47–$1.50 exposes the lower end of the weekly range, invalidating the near-term reversal thesis. Related coverage of XRP’s resistance levels, whale flow, and ETF data is worth cross-referencing before positioning either way.
Discover: The Best Token Presales
Maxi Doge Targets Early Mover Upside as XRP Tests Key Levels
Brandt’s chart validates the long-term XRP thesis, but a 251% move to $5.40 on a token already carrying tens of billions in market cap plays out over years, not weeks. That math doesn’t excite traders looking for near-term multiples. It does explain why attention keeps drifting toward presale-stage plays with smaller denominators.
Maxi Doge ($MAXI) is one of those plays. It is an Ethereum-based meme token built around a 240-lb canine mascot and a “1000x leverage” trading-culture identity. The presale has raised $4.8 million at a current price of $0.0002841, with dynamic APY staking live for holders.
Standout features include holder-only trading competitions with leaderboard rewards and a Maxi Fund treasury earmarked for liquidity and partnerships. The meme-first, gym-bro marketing angle (“never skip leg-day, never skip a pump”) is endearing on temperament. The accumulation numbers suggest plenty of traders are picking a side.
Research Maxi Doge directly before the presale window ends.
Trade XRP on Bybit and Get a Chance to Win Our $1,000 USDT Airdrop
The post XRP Price Prediction: Peter Brandt Says XRP Charts Justify a Bet appeared first on Cryptonews.
Crypto World
Solana Developers Say “No Alpenrush” as Alpenglow Mainnet Launch Rumors Collapse
The Alpenglow mainnet launch is not happening on September 28, despite reports pointing to that date. Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko answered the rumor with a single word, “decel.”
Alpenglow is a consensus overhaul that targets 150-millisecond finality, down from roughly 12.8 seconds for full finality today. Some outlets had also warned that SOL could drop if the switch did not happen.
Alpenglow Mainnet Launch Date Traced to a Validator Schedule
Roger Wattenhofer, head of research at Anza and a professor at ETH Zurich, pushed back on the reports on X. Anza develops Agave, Solana’s main validator client.
Why would we test a protocol for only a few days before activating it? There is no Alpenrush.
His point was that Alpenglow had entered public testing only days earlier.
Yakovenko then quoted the post and added “decel,” crypto slang for slowing down. In contrast, “accel” signals a push to move faster.
The date likely came from Anza’s Agave v4.3 release schedule. It lists September 28 as the day mainnet resumes feature activation. However, the entry never mentions Alpenglow.
Meanwhile, the follow-up v4.4 timeline sets the next mainnet activation window for November 9. Anza calls that schedule tentative, and it does not name Alpenglow either.
SOL Price Barely Reacts to the Clarification
Solana (SOL) traded at $119.85 at press time, down 0.36% over 24 hours, according to BeInCrypto Markets data. The muted move suggests few traders had priced in a September 28 Alpenglow mainnet launch.
The cautious tone also has a recent backdrop. In August, a routing fault pushed Solana close to a network halt. Against that record, Wattenhofer’s comments suggest developers want to avoid a rushed consensus change.
Alpenglow is also not the only speed upgrade in progress. In August, Solana began halving its block time from 400 to 200 milliseconds. That change speeds up block production, while Alpenglow targets how quickly blocks become final.
Solana has been preparing validators for Alpenglow since July. For now, the upgrade stays on testnet, and neither Agave schedule gives it a mainnet date.
The post Solana Developers Say “No Alpenrush” as Alpenglow Mainnet Launch Rumors Collapse appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Crypto World
U.S., China to lower tariffs on $60 billion of goods. Here’s what qualifies
Rancher Curtis Schroder, 57, and his son Derek lead heifers toward a transport truck on the Schroder family ranch in Walsh, Colorado on May 9, 2026.
Mark Makela | Getty Images News | Getty Images
BEIJING — The U.S. and China are planning to reduce tariffs on $30 billion worth of goods from each country, according to government announcements from both sides Monday.
The detailed lists includes mostly imports of toys, sports equipment and Christmas decorations by the U.S., while American agricultural products accounted for much of the far longer list of imports by China.
Washington has sought to reduce its record trade deficit with Beijing, as the Asian country exports far more to the U.S. than it imports. U.S. goods trade deficit with China was more than $202 billion last year.
“If we see the tariff cuts actually implemented before the holiday season, it could provide a welcome boost to U.S. consumption and to retailers,” said Jacob Cooke, CEO at WPIC.
Cooke, whose company primarily helps U.S. brands sell in China, said that Beijing’s import list includes fast-growing categories such as hair care and packaged pet food, where Chinese brands are highly competitive against U.S. offerings. “Every percentage point counts for price competitiveness and preserving margin.”
However, it was not immediately clear when lower tariffs would take effect, and by how much the duties would go down. The U.S. and China last year slapped import tariffs effectively of over 40% and more than 30%, respectively, on each other.
The two countries limited further tariff increases after a one-year truce reached last fall. Last week, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said negotiators agreed to extend that truce to January.
Monday’s announcement followed U.S. President Donald Trump’s summit with Chinese President Xi Jinping in Washington, D.C., last week. The two sides said the highly anticipated U.S.-China “Board of Trade” would consist of officials from both governments, and would meet at least once a quarter, with the top officials meeting “whenever necessary.”
Lower tariffs could substantially boost trade, especially for highly competitive Chinese companies. Home goods seller Ryan Zhao, director of Jiangsu Green Willow Textile, expects sales in the second half of the year to grow by 30% from a year ago if tariff cuts are implemented.
Here’s a select list of products set to benefit:
U.S. imports of Chinese goods (total items: 77)
Fireworks
Plates, cups, bowls, serving dishes
Tableware and kitchenware
Beads
Blankets (including electric ones) and rugs
Bed linen
Table linen
Curtains
Garden umbrellas
Artificial flowers
Shavers
Flashlights
Microwave ovens
Christmas-tree lamps and ornaments
Highchairs
Children play yards
Sleeping bags
Pillows
Toys (including tricycles, but excluding items that connect to WiFi or Bluetooth)
Billiards balls, chalk and tables
Playing cards
Rackets for games, other than for “lawn-tennis or badminton”
Soccer balls, baseballs, softballs, lawn-tennis balls
Fish hooks and fishing line
Artists’ brushers
Vacuum flasks
Chinese imports of U.S. goods (total items: 1,619)
Horses, donkeys, cattle, pigs, sheep, goats, chickens for breeding
Other livestock
Bees
Frozen pork
Frozen lamb
Frozen, fresh or chilled whole chickens or turkeys
Frozen chicken feet
Rabbit meat, excluding rabbit heads
Dried, smoked or salted beef
Live freshwater ornamental fish
Fresh or chilled tuna
Frozen Atlantic salmon
Buttermilk
Roasted peanuts
Peanut butter
Tomato juice
Ice cream and other frozen products
Fresh apples
Whiskey
Soybeans for seed
Soybean flour and meal
—CNBC’s Matthew Tan contributed to this report.
Crypto World
Bitcoin Falls Below $83K as Liquidity Rotation Delays Bullish Target
Bitcoin slid to weekly lows on Monday after earlier upside momentum faded, with traders pointing to a sudden buildup of sell-side orders on exchange books around $85,700. The move triggered notable liquidations, while broader risk sentiment also weakened as US markets reacted to renewed uncertainty over the Iran situation.
TradingView data showed BTC/USD dropping below $82,700 for the first time since Sept. 21, following a strong run that included the pair’s highest weekly close since late January near $84,450. Instead of pushing toward last week’s highs above $87,000, price encountered a concentrated pocket of resistance.
Key takeaways
- BTC/USD fell below $82,700 after failing to retest the prior week’s above-$87,000 highs.
- About $30 million in ask liquidity appeared around $85,700, coinciding with the reversal from higher levels.
- CoinGlass data indicated roughly $70 million of liquidations over 24 hours, primarily cutting into nearby long positions.
- US stock-market futures weakened alongside crude oil strength after President Donald Trump declined to rule out further strikes on Iran.
- Analyst Aksel Kibar warned Bitcoin could revisit the sub-$80,000 area if momentum doesn’t quickly stabilize.
Why order-book liquidity can flip momentum
According to TradingView, BTC/USD turned lower after a decisive attempt at consolidation above $84,450 failed to extend. The most cited microstructure signal was the appearance of a large, clearly defined layer of sell-side liquidity on exchanges around $85,700, with over $30 million clustered near that price.
In practical terms, these “liquidity walls” can matter because they concentrate sell interest at a specific level. If buying demand can’t absorb those resting orders, price may struggle to advance and can even accelerate downward as traders reassess the likelihood of a breakout. The reported timing—after Bitcoin failed to move back toward eight-month highs above $87,000—suggests the market’s attempt at continuation met a predictable obstacle.
Market participants also noted that this kind of conspicuous order-book change often draws attention from larger traders, including those managing hedges or positioning for future moves. Whether the liquidity layer represents genuine long-term supply or more tactical order placement remains difficult to confirm from order-book snapshots alone, but the impact on near-term price action was clear.
Liquidations underscore the speed of the downturn
While order-book data explains the “why” behind resistance, liquidation statistics help show the “how” behind the move. CoinGlass liquidation data, as referenced in the report, recorded liquidations of nearby long positions totaling around $70 million over 24 hours at the time of writing.
When price breaks through key intraday levels, leveraged traders who are positioned on the long side can be forced out quickly. That fast unwinding can compound selling pressure, turning a stalled breakout attempt into a sharper downside move, especially when liquidity is already strained by the presence of a heavy sell wall.
For investors and traders, these figures are less about day-to-day drama and more about confirming that the decline wasn’t purely slow drifting—there was enough leverage in the market to produce liquidation cascades.
Risk-off pressure from US geopolitics and oil
Bitcoin’s weakness also lined up with a deterioration in broader risk sentiment. The report linked the move in crypto to downside in US stock-market futures after President Donald Trump refused to rule out additional strikes on Iran.
In remarks reported by Fox News during the PGA Tour Presidents Cup on Sunday, Trump said: “I don’t want to say that. I don’t want to say that. I mean, it’s possible, but I just don’t want to say that.”
At the time of writing, Nasdaq futures were down about 0.9%, while WTI crude oil moved above $95 per barrel for the first time since Sept. 24. Rising oil prices often feed into wider concerns about inflation, economic activity, and risk appetite—factors that can spill over into crypto even when the immediate catalysts are order-book driven.
For traders monitoring correlations, the takeaway is that Monday’s drop wasn’t isolated to crypto microstructure alone; macro headlines appeared to reinforce a shift toward caution.
What to watch around $85,700 and next support zones
The $85,700 level is now central to the near-term debate. The report described it as the barrier that blocked another attempt to reach the 2026 year-open level at $88,700, where Bitcoin stalled last week.
Even with a strong weekly close previously, the failure to reclaim the path back toward $88,700 suggests bulls still need a clearer sequence of higher highs and higher lows rather than just intermittent pushes. As the price moves, the market will likely treat earlier resistance areas as potential pivot points—turning them into either launchpads or magnets for further selling depending on how quickly Bitcoin can recover.
Analyst Aksel Kibar warned that Bitcoin’s current behavior did not resemble a decisive breakout. In a post on X, he cautioned that hesitant price action can lead to returning inside the familiar range from $60,000 to $80,000—an area the report frames as where BTC/USD spent much of 2026.
The immediate risk highlighted by that commentary is a scenario where the market fails to hold above the recent breakdown area and instead revisits sub-$80,000 territory. In the short term, that means traders should watch for whether downside continues to attract liquidations or whether support reasserts itself quickly enough to prevent a deeper retracement.
Going forward, the key uncertainty is whether the $85,700 order-book pressure dissolves and allows price to rebuild toward $88,700, or whether liquidation-driven weakness and macro jitters keep pulling BTC back toward the $80,000 zone; monitoring both the exchange liquidity changes and broader US risk headlines may offer the most practical signal for the next move.
Crypto World
CLARITY Act 2.0: Failed Senate Vote Opens Door to a Rewrite
The Senate did not invoke cloture on the motion to proceed to H.R. 3633, the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, on September 15, 2026. That vote did not kill the bill, pass it, or send it anywhere near a presidential signature. It left the measure exactly where the record shows it now sits: passed House. But what’s next for the CLARITY Act?
The procedural record is unambiguous even where the political story around it isn’t. Rep. J. French Hill introduced the bill on May 29, 2025, and the House passed it 294-134 on July 17, 2025, a lopsided, bipartisan margin that made it the most credible market-structure vehicle to reach the Senate in years, a point worth remembering amid the broader market anxiety around stalled regulatory progress.
Jurisdiction split across the House Financial Services and Agriculture committees, with the Senate assigning the bill to Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Earn $50 and Enter $300K Prize Draw on EdgeX
What the Congressional Record Says
On June 1, 2026, the Senate Banking Committee reported the bill out with an amendment in the nature of a substitute from Tim Scott, the committee chair. That single procedural fact carries real weight: it shows Senate Banking reported a substitute amendment, but the record does not establish that the September floor version was a rewrite of the House text. The latest listed action after the failed cloture vote is a motion by Sen. Thom Tillis to reconsider – a procedural door left open, not a closed one.
What the bill itself would actually do is spelled out plainly in the Congress.gov summary. It hands the CFTC primary authority over digital-commodity transactions, exchanges, brokers, and dealers, with qualification tied to whether a blockchain is mature or has reached defined decentralized control, or whether an issuer files specified reports.
The SEC retains jurisdiction over designated broker-dealer, alternative-trading-system, and national securities exchange activity involving digital commodities, and every digital-commodity intermediary would fall under Bank Secrecy Act anti-money-laundering obligations. The same illicit-finance terrain keeps surfacing in enforcement cases like the one detailed in recent crypto money-laundering prosecutions.
None of that legislative text explains why cloture failed. The primary record doesn’t identify ethics provisions, stablecoin yield, or developer protections as the deciding factors in the vote. Those are negotiating themes reported around the bill, not causes established by the bill’s own procedural history.
Trade Crypto on Bybit and Get a Chance to Win Our $1,000 USDT Airdrop
What Are The Next CLARITY Act Draft’s Pressure Points?
Any rewrite still has to clear the same architecture already baked into the bill. Things like mature-blockchain criteria, issuer disclosure, trade-monitoring and recordkeeping rules, customer-asset segregation, and registration mechanics for exchanges, brokers, and dealers.
Those provisions aren’t in dispute in the public record; the fights are over how they get amended around the edges. A joint statement from the American Bankers Association, Bank Policy Institute, and several other banking trade groups following the cloture vote pushed for targeted changes to stablecoin-yield policy specifically, framing it as the price of continued industry support for a durable framework. This is a dispute that dovetails with the broader debate over how stablecoins compete with traditional payment rails.

Whether Senate Banking Republicans, Agriculture Committee negotiators with CFTC oversight, or Democrats whose votes are needed to clear 60 end up controlling the next text is an open contest. The committee record shows only that Scott’s substitute got the bill this far, not that it will define what comes next.
Lawmakers have raised concerns about ethics provisions and may seek a say in any ethics and conflicts-of-interest language before backing a revised bill, and their votes are arithmetically necessary regardless of who drafts the first page. The SEC and CFTC aren’t waiting on Congress to resolve any of this; both agencies retain rulemaking authority under existing statute and can move on to narrower guidance while the legislative fight over CLARITY Act continues.
For now, this leaves the market with two tracks running in parallel, agency action that can shift compliance obligations without a vote, and a statutory rewrite that only Congress can finish.
Discover: The Best Token Presales
The post CLARITY Act 2.0: Failed Senate Vote Opens Door to a Rewrite appeared first on Cryptonews.
-
Fashion3 days agoWeekend Open Thread: J.McLaughlin – Corporette.com
-
Tech14 hours agoOpenAI is preparing “o,” an always-on ChatGPT assistant that could handle email
-
Crypto World6 days agoGoldman Sachs and Deutsche Bank Agree: The S&P 500 Rally Isn't Over
-
Fashion4 days ago8 iPhone Accessories That Add Personality
-
Entertainment5 days agoThese 17 Fall Amazon Dresses Seriously Look Like Anthropologie
-
Tech5 days agoReolink’s solar 4K security camera falls to its lowest price in months
-
Crypto World5 days agoThis Bearish Netflix Stock Trade Can Cash In On Video Streaming Giant’s Woes
-
Crypto World6 days agoTrump-Xi Polymarket Odds for Handshake Hit 50%
-
Tech7 days agoGoogle’s $899 Googlebook is a bet that you’ll buy a new laptop for Gemini
-
Crypto World5 days agoCrude Oil Prices Pressured by Diplomatic Hopes in the Middle East
-
Crypto World5 days agoBitcoin price tests $83,600 Supertrend support after $87K rejection
-
Business5 days agoOil Price Today (September 23): Crude oil below $100 on hopes of US-Iran talks. What did Trump say?
-
Crypto World5 days agoBitGo says Bitcoin absorbed Fed hike, CLARITY failure
-
Crypto World5 days agoBitcoin Threatens Sub-$84,000 Breakdown as Long Liquidations Spike
-
Crypto World6 days agoMeta Jumps 11% As Muse Shines and Investors Show an Appetite for Advancing AI
-
Crypto World5 days agoDid Jim Cramer Just Give GameStop Stock the Kiss of Death When He Said the Turnaround Is Working?
-
Tech14 hours agoAnthropic turns Claude into an AI marketplace with 2,000+ plugins and connectors
-
Crypto World7 days agoTrump, Xi Meet on S&P 500's Best Day Since Early August: Will Markets Stay Bullish?
-
Tech5 days agoUiPath’s Dines says AI needs a manual and launches Cartographer to write it
-
Crypto World7 days agoStrategy Adds 950 BTC for $76M, Funds $174M STRC Buyback

You must be logged in to post a comment Login