Header image: AI-generated illustration by WordUp News.

October retail sales in the UK grew by just 1.5% year on year, a modest result that shows many households chose to wait for Black Friday discounts rather than spend in the weeks before. Figures from the British Retail Consortium (BRC) and KPMG show growth edging above the three-month average of 1.2%, but the details point to a cautious consumer.

What the October retail sales figures show

The headline number hides a split between food and everything else. Food sales rose 3.2%, slightly slower than the 3.5% recorded a year earlier but still ahead of the 12-month average of 3%. Two things helped. Halloween fell on a Saturday, lifting spending on snacks, costumes and decorations, and government advice to keep emergency supplies at home gave a modest boost to cupboard staples.

Non-food sales, by contrast, were flat. Big-ticket categories such as furniture and white goods fared badly as shoppers held out for November deals. Clothing and footwear did grow, along with “cosy essentials” like duvets, as cooler temperatures and autumn storms arrived, according to KPMG’s Linda Ellett.

Stockpiling advice divided the industry

City AM reported that the emergency-supplies guidance caught retailers off guard and prompted fears that a rush on shops could cause shortages of essentials. It said Marks & Spencer boss Stuart Machin argued the advice had damaged consumer sentiment by worrying shoppers. The BRC’s own figures suggest the effect on sales was small, a “modest” lift for staples rather than a buying frenzy.

Barclays data shows shoppers spending less per purchase

Separate card data from Barclays painted a similar picture, and in some respects a weaker one. It put retail spending growth at only 0.5% in October. Clothing transactions rose 5.2% while spending on clothing fell 1.8%, which suggests shoppers were buying more often but spending less each time.

Overall consumer card spending grew 2.3% year on year, up from 2% in September and the strongest since July last year. Much of that came from essentials, which rose 3.1% as fuel spending jumped 22.7% after diesel passed £2 a litre for the first time. Non-essential spending edged up 1.9%, with entertainment a bright spot.

Confidence is slipping. All five of Barclays’ consumer confidence measures fell in October ahead of the Chancellor’s Budget on October 28. Confidence in the UK economy dropped to 23% from 26%, and confidence in the ability to spend on non-essentials fell to 50% from 54%. Barclays economist Jack Meaning described the numbers as “resilient” but noted that summer optimism about the economy was starting to fade. He said the Chancellor’s cost-of-living measures would help people at the margins but would not fundamentally change the outlook for many households.

Retailers look to Black Friday and Christmas

BRC chief executive Helen Dickinson said retailers hope pent-up demand will translate into stronger spending in November and December. She warned that shoppers and businesses face rising interest rates and energy bills, and called on the government to move faster in cutting the taxes and regulations that make it harder to keep prices down.

City AM reported that retail bosses had hoped for help with energy and employment costs in the Budget and were angered by the handling of business rates, which it said will still rise in line with inflation despite a claim that they had been frozen for high street firms.

The risk for the sector is that the delayed spending does not fully materialise. KPMG’s Ellett said the sector “desperately needs” strong sales to offset higher costs as the promotional and festive season begins. Weak October retail sales may prove a pause rather than a collapse, but with consumer confidence falling and household bills rising, retailers will be relying heavily on Black Friday and the weeks that follow.

Explore more on this topic with Vexel Search.

The Paul McCartney billionaire story is now official, at least according to Forbes, which has put the 84-year-old’s net worth at about $1.4bn (roughly £1bn). That places him third among the world’s richest musicians, behind Jay-Z at $2.8bn and Taylor Swift at $2bn.

The ranking was reported on 9 November 2026. Variety noted that it came with the launch of a Forbes newsletter called “The Billie”. Forbes credits the fortune to his song catalogue, legal manoeuvres, touring and art collection. According to the Independent, McCartney has not commented on the estimate.

Where the Paul McCartney billionaire fortune comes from

The biggest engine is MPL Communications, the publishing company he founded in 1969. It manages his own songs alongside other artists’ copyrights, and Forbes says its catalogue acquisitions are worth nearly a quarter of a billion dollars. They include the work of Buddy Holly, Broadway musical scores and seasonal standards such as “It’s Beginning to Look a Lot Like Christmas” and “The Christmas Song”. The Guardian summed up the logic: whenever a high school stages Grease or someone streams “Blue Suede Shoes”, McCartney gets paid.

The Beatles supply a second pillar. As one of the band’s four members, he receives 25% of the earnings of Apple Corps, the group’s holding company, which reportedly generates about $50m a year from streaming, vinyl and merchandise. Forbes estimates that income stream is worth more than $150m to each member or their estate.

A third piece comes from the Beatles’ songwriting copyrights. McCartney earns around $10m annually from his share, which Forbes values at $200m or more. The Guardian notes he fought for that stake in US and UK courts over the past two decades, which is presumably what Forbes means by “legal manoeuvres”.

Touring, property and paintings

The rest of the picture is more conventional wealth. His Got Back tour ran for 79 shows between 2022 and 2025. The estimate also counts real estate, including properties in the UK and the Hamptons, and a art collection that features works by Picasso and Magritte.

The figure arrives during a busy year. McCartney released The Boys of Dungeon Lane, his 20th solo album, in May, and the Standard reports it debuted at number one on the UK albums chart. He was the musical guest on the season finale of Saturday Night Live that month. In July he played “I Want to Hold Your Hand” at Swift’s wedding to Travis Kelce at Madison Square Garden, reportedly for the first time in 60 years. This year also brought Man on the Run, Morgan Neville’s documentary about his life after the Beatles.

Money has rarely been how McCartney describes his motivation. He has called himself a “playaholic” and told Apple Music’s Zane Lowe that he hates it “when making music starts to feel like work”. Whatever the motive, the Forbes numbers suggest the Paul McCartney billionaire milestone owes less to any one hit than to decades of owning, protecting and re-exploiting songs, his own and other people’s.

As with any such ranking, these are estimates rather than audited accounts, and the sources report only what Forbes calculated. Still, the arithmetic is striking: a former Beatle who started a publishing company in 1969 now sits behind only two of today’s biggest stars.

Explore more on this topic with Vexel Search.

File photo: ACL18051018-122 (43716152470).jpg by Raph_PH, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

Shareholders in Premier Inn owner Whitbread have thrown out an activist investor’s attempt to win a Whitbread board seat, handing the company’s leadership a clear endorsement of its turnaround strategy at a general meeting on Monday.

Corvex, the New York-based investment firm that holds a 6.4% stake, had wanted its partner James Gemmel appointed as a director. Reports differ slightly on the size of the defeat. City AM said more than 83% of votes were cast against the motion. The PA report, carried by The Independent and The Standard, said 91% voted against once Corvex’s own votes were excluded. Either way, the result was lopsided.

What Corvex wanted from a Whitbread board seat

Corvex’s case was that Whitbread has underperformed its peers and the wider market. Managing partner Keith Meister said the company’s “persistent structural complexity and chronic misallocation of capital” had produced double-digit negative returns over one, three, five and ten years. He said Corvex had raised its concerns repeatedly with the board and management, but they had “remained anchored to the status quo.”

The investor was particularly critical of Whitbread’s £1.1bn expansion into Germany and called for a “rigorous, fact-based review” of how the group spends its money. It said Gemmel would bring a “fresh perspective” on strategy and on plans to return cash to shareholders. Corvex also told investors it was not seeking control of the company and was not demanding a sale.

Whitbread’s defence: the plan is already moving

Whitbread argued that a fresh strategic review was unnecessary. According to City AM, the company called it a “complete waste” of time and money, because its current plans had only just been drawn up. Those plans include selling all its standalone restaurants, such as the Beefeater and Brewers Fayre chains, and raising £1.5bn by selling the freehold rights to more of its hotels. The group operates about 850 Premier Inn hotels in the UK.

The five-year plan also targets £250m of cost savings and a cut of more than £1bn in capital expenditure. It involves job cuts of roughly 3,800, a figure City AM rounded to nearly 4,000. City AM reported that the company attributed the measures partly to the “unexpected” hit from higher business rates, and that it aims to return £2bn to investors.

Chair Christine Hodgson said the “overwhelming majority of shareholders have voted decisively to back the board and our strategy.” She added that the company would keep delivering a plan with “clear and measurable milestones” that it is “already executing at pace,” and that it expects a “step change in margins, cash flows and returns.”

What the result means for investors

The vote shows that most investors, at least for now, prefer to give management’s plan time rather than add an activist voice to the boardroom. The market reaction was muted and a little negative: City AM said Whitbread shares fell 1.9% to 2,774p straight after the result. The stock has still risen about 19% over six months.

The defeat does not settle the argument over returns. Corvex’s criticism of long-term performance and capital allocation is now on the public record, and Whitbread has staked its credibility on the milestones it has set. With the Whitbread board seat question closed, investors will judge the company on whether the savings, disposals and shareholder returns arrive as promised.

Explore more on this topic with Vexel Search.

File photo: Whitbread’s Stables 1.jpg by Mx. Granger, CC0, via Wikimedia Commons.

Header image: AI-generated illustration by WordUp News.

Robinhood has launched US IPO access for retail investors in the United Kingdom, letting them request shares in selected American stock market debuts at the offer price before trading begins. The company announced the service on Monday, 9 November.

What UK customers can actually do

Eligible customers can use their existing general investment accounts to browse upcoming offerings in the Robinhood app and submit a request for shares. Robinhood says it will not charge trading commissions for the service. Investors still have to pay for any shares they are allocated, at the official offering price.

The key caveat is that a request is not a guarantee. According to reporting on the announcement, the number of shares set aside for individual investors varies by offering, and allocations depend on how each deal is distributed and on customer demand. Demand for popular listings can easily outstrip what is available to retail buyers.

Research tools and the offer-price advantage

Prospectuses and filings submitted to the US Securities and Exchange Commission will appear on each company’s asset details page. That lets customers read about a company’s finances, business and disclosed risks before committing. The pitch is a chance to seek shares before the market sets a trading price. An opening price on an exchange can differ from the offer price, and that gap can work in either direction.

Such access has historically sat mainly with institutional investors and wealthy individuals, and Robinhood is positioning the product as a way to widen the door.

Transparency gaps remain

Several details are still missing. Robinhood has partnered with a UK Public Offer Platform provider to run the service but has not named it. It has also not said which upcoming US IPOs will be offered to UK customers. Cointelegraph said it asked the company for clarification and had not received a response by publication. Until Robinhood publishes specifics, it is hard to judge how often UK users will see meaningful opportunities.

Building on a US track record and a busy year

Robinhood launched the product in the US in 2021 and says it has taken part in more than 50 IPOs since. The UK rollout follows the company’s August move into UK cryptocurrency trading through Bitstamp, a sign that Robinhood is broadening its British offering beyond digital assets toward mainstream equities.

The timing also comes after a strong quarter. In October, Robinhood reported record third-quarter revenue of $1.42 billion and net income of $476 million. Its shares (HOOD) closed Friday at $80.91, up 3.2%, and traded around $79.50 in premarket trading on Monday, according to Yahoo Finance data cited by Cointelegraph.

What to watch

For UK savers, the appeal of US IPO access is clear: no commission and a shot at the offer price. The practical value will hinge on three things the sources do not yet answer: which listings will be available, how large retail allocations will be, and how the unnamed platform partner handles demand. IPO shares can also trade well above or below their offer price, so a successful request does not mean a profitable one.

Explore more on this topic with Vexel Search.

Putting money down on a Cybertruck no longer guarantees a truck: Elon Musk said Monday that Tesla will have to return Cybertruck deposits to “a lot of people” because orders far outpace what the company can build before it closes the line in roughly eight months.

Musk made the statement in a post on X, three days after announcing that Tesla would stop making the steel-bodied pickup. “We will try to make as many as possible before shutting down the line,” he wrote, adding that the Cybertruck order rate “far exceeds our production rate.” He did not say how many customers would be refunded or how much money is involved. Business Insider noted that the number of outstanding orders is unclear and that Tesla’s website still appeared to be taking them.

Musk rejects the “unprofitable” narrative

Musk pushed back on reports that the truck was a money-loser. He said the decision was not about profitability but about “opportunity cost”: the complexity of the Cybertruck, in his words, is “vastly outweighed by the value of incremental Cybercab production.” The Cybercab is Tesla’s two-seat robotaxi, which has no steering wheel or pedals. Production began at the Texas factory earlier this year, and paid rides started in Austin in September.

Over the weekend, Musk answered fans who were petitioning him on X to spare the truck. He said Tesla’s engineers can “only do so many things” and that a separate Cybertruck production line, supply chain and engineering team would pull people and factory space away from scaling the Cybercab. He also called the Cybertruck the “best vehicle Tesla has ever made” and described its end as the “end of an era,” according to The Next Web. Reuters, as cited by that outlet, reported that Tesla will add a production shift to work through outstanding orders before the line is dismantled.

From a million reservations to a shrinking market

The gap between the early hype and the actual sales record is stark. Musk once said reservations had reached 1 million and predicted annual sales of around 250,000. Tesla does not break out Cybertruck numbers, but Kelley Blue Book data cited by The Next Web put US sales at 20,237 last year, down 48% from 38,965 in 2024. Sales in the first nine months of this year fell a further 28%. Business Insider put 2026 sales so far at around 16,000, and TechCrunch cited industry estimates of about 71,000 trucks sold since deliveries began in late 2023.

Some of that demand came from within Musk’s own business orbit. According to its S-1 filing ahead of an IPO, SpaceX bought $131 million worth of Cybertrucks from Tesla in 2025. Tesla also raised prices again in August, putting the cheapest version at $74,990, and last month it cancelled reservations in Australia and New Zealand.

What the refunds signal for Tesla’s direction

The refunds are a small piece of a larger strategic shift. Tesla also discontinued the Model S and Model X earlier this year, reportedly to free up factory space for its Optimus humanoid robot. Tesla lists an installed capacity of more than 125,000 Cybercabs a year at its Texas plant, and the Cybercab is central to Musk’s plan to recast Tesla as an AI and robotics company rather than a conventional carmaker.

For buyers, the practical question is who ends up with one of the last trucks. Tesla has not said how it will decide which orders get filled, and it is unclear whether the Cybertruck will be built anywhere other than the Texas factory near Austin. TechCrunch noted that a final “scarcity” bump in demand is possible, but it is unlikely to approach the projections Musk made years ago. For now, anyone holding Cybertruck deposits is waiting to learn whether they will receive a truck or a refund.

File photo: 2024 Tesla Cybertruck, Moab 02.jpg by A1C6, CC0, via Wikimedia Commons.

The latest easyJet job cuts proposal puts about 50 head office roles at risk, just days before shareholders vote on the airline’s £5.7bn takeover by US private equity firm Apollo.

The Luton-based carrier has confirmed it is consulting on the plans, which would affect around 50 positions in a head office team of more than 2,300. EasyJet acknowledged the proposals after The Times reported them. The shareholder vote is due on Wednesday, and if the deal is approved, completion is expected in the first quarter of 2027.

What easyJet says about the proposals

The airline has described the plans as modest. A spokesperson said easyJet has to run efficiently as a low-cost operator “so we can keep fares low for our customers and invest in future growth opportunities”, and that the proposals touch “a very small proportion of head office roles” so the business is “best set up to support” its “ambitious plans”. The cuts amount to roughly 2% of the head office team.

The sources say the cuts are understood to be unconnected to Apollo, its planned acquisition or any plans it has for the airline after the deal closes. Apollo is also understood to have played no part in the process or the proposals. The timing is awkward all the same, because unions have been wary of what a private equity owner might mean for staff.

Why unions are watching closely

Unions in the UK and Europe have raised concerns about possible redundancies after the takeover, and about the debt the deal would put on the airline’s balance sheet. Apollo has pledged not to make redundancies for 12 months after completion. That pledge does not directly address the current consultation, which is being run by easyJet before any change of ownership.

The British Airline Pilots Association (Balpa) says “important questions remain regarding the long-term implications of the transaction”. Its main worry is “the extent to which the transaction may affect employees beyond the 12-month period covered by the statements of intention”. In other words, the union’s concern is about what happens once the one-year promise runs out.

The deal behind the headlines

Apollo agreed to buy easyJet in July at 715p a share. It prevailed in a bidding contest with rival US investment firm Castlelake, which had proposed £5.5bn, or 690p a share, before leaving the contest in August. Apollo also owns The Restaurant Group, the parent of Wagamama.

Sir Stelios Haji-Ioannou founded easyJet in 1995 as a low-cost alternative to British Airways. He and his family hold about 15% of the company and have backed the takeover. City AM has also reported that shareholders who keep their stake after completion could face being squeezed out and are unlikely to receive dividends.

For now, the easyJet job cuts are a consultation, not a final decision, and the numbers are small next to the scale of the deal. Wednesday’s vote will settle the ownership question. How the airline treats its staff after the 12-month pledge ends is likely to stay under scrutiny well beyond that.

File photo: Berlin Brandenburg Airport easyJet Europe Airbus A320-214 OE-IDO (DSC07809).jpg by MarcelX42, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

Header image: AI-generated illustration by WordUp News.

ITV will update investors on trading next Wednesday, and the ITV Sky deal will dominate the questions. The £1.6 billion sale of its media and entertainment arm is now under formal scrutiny after Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy intervened on public interest grounds.

What the ITV Sky deal investigations will examine

Ms Nandy’s intervention has triggered parallel investigations by the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) and the media regulator Ofcom. They have until January 27 to report back to her on how the deal would affect media plurality in the UK and free speech. That deadline sets the first real timetable for the political and regulatory test the tie-up must pass.

The sale covers ITV’s terrestrial channels and its ITVX streaming service. It does not include ITV Studios, the production business behind I’m A Celebrity… Get Me Out Of Here and dramas such as Mr Bates Vs The Post Office. If completed, the deal would create what supporters describe as a significant UK competitor to the global streaming giants. In the UK, Sky employs about 20,000 people, while ITV has roughly 2,400 workers in the division being sold.

Legislation on streaming

Ms Nandy has also said she will bring forward new streaming legislation, citing her “specific concerns” about this transaction. The aim is to ensure the public interest test can apply to on-demand programming as well as traditional broadcasting. The move suggests the government sees a gap between how media mergers have been assessed and how audiences now watch TV.

A strategy shift in question

For ITV, the sale is the centrepiece of a plan to become a production-focused business. Russ Mould, investment director at AJ Bell, said the company hopes to “change the channel and start a new season with a fresh cast”. He said that would cut its reliance on advertising spend, which tracks the economy closely and has an “outsized impact on investor sentiment”.

But Mr Mould said the minister’s move has “upset the applecart”. “At the very least this could delay any deal from getting across the line,” he said, adding that management would be expected to explain what it would do if the ITV Sky deal were blocked.

What the numbers might show

The trading update will also be read for signs of recovery. ITV has said its performance this year would be weighted to the second half, owing to the scheduling of programmes and licensing deals. In July, however, it warned that third-quarter advertising revenue was set to fall about 5% year on year, blaming macro-economic headwinds. That came despite a World Cup-related boost that helped advertising revenue rise 3% in the preceding three months.

The first half was healthier. Pre-tax profit rose 16% to £78 million, and group revenue climbed 2% to £1.89 billion. Investors will want to know whether the second half can build on that while the ITV Sky deal remains under review.

For now, the outcome is uncertain. The investigations may take the sale in several directions, and the January 27 reports will show how much weight regulators give to plurality and free speech concerns.

Explore more on this topic with Vexel Search.

Header image: AI-generated illustration by WordUp News.

The government has quietly corrected its business rates relief guidance for England, adding £33 million to the discounts that retail, hospitality and leisure (RHL) firms will receive. The change came only days after councils were given the original figures.

What changed in the business rates relief figures

The first guidance to councils set the discount for RHL businesses at 5p in the multiplier, the figure used to calculate tax bills. But it did not account for inflation. Bills are due to be uprated by September’s 3.5% inflation rate, so a discount fixed at 5p would have lost value in real terms.

Officials then issued new guidance. From next April the national multiplier discount will rise from 5p to 5.2p, which is broadly in line with the 3.5% uprating. The small business RHL multiplier has been revised from 39.7p to 39.5p, while the standard RHL multiplier falls from 44.7p to 44.5p. The result is £33 million more in discounts for high street firms than councils were first told to expect.

Error or omission? The government isn’t saying

Councils were told the revision ensures inflation adjustments are now applied consistently and reflects the government’s policy intention. The government did not explain whether the original numbers came from a calculation error or an omission. The Department for Housing, Communities and Local Government has been approached for comment.

Whatever the cause, the episode suggests the original figures did not match what ministers meant to deliver. The corrected rates restore the intended value of the relief rather than add to it.

Industry reaction: welcome, but avoidable

Alex Probyn, practice leader for property tax in Europe and Asia-Pacific at the tax firm Ryan, called the correction “welcome”. He said that raising the discount protects its value against inflation and is good news for RHL businesses.

He was also critical of how it happened. “Stability and certainty start with getting the published tax rates right,” he said. Businesses and their advisers had begun planning around the figures issued on Budget Day, only to see them change within days. Probyn argued that the interaction between inflation and a fixed discount was “entirely foreseeable” and that firms “should have been given the correct figures on Budget Day.”

Why the details matter for planning

The adjustments to the multipliers are small, a fraction of a penny. But business rates bills are calculated by applying the multiplier to a property’s rateable value, so small shifts add up across thousands of premises. That is how the correction reaches £33 million in total.

For firms, the more immediate issue is reliability. Property tax is a major fixed cost for shops, pubs, restaurants and leisure venues, and many were already budgeting for next April. Anyone who modelled their bills on the Budget Day numbers will need to update their forecasts. The corrected business rates relief works in their favour, but the lack of an explanation for the original mistake leaves open questions about how the guidance was prepared.

Explore more on this topic with Vexel Search.

Tesla plans to wind down Cybertruck production at its Texas factory around the middle of 2027, CEO Elon Musk said in a post on X, so the plant can build more of the company’s two-seat Cybercab robotaxi. The announcement marks a notable retreat for a vehicle Musk once pitched as the future of the pickup truck.

Musk wrote that Tesla “will be winding down production of the Cybertruck at Gigafactory Texas around the middle of next year to make room for increased Cybercab production.” Outlets differ slightly on timing, with some describing the post as late Thursday and others as early Friday, but they agree on the substance. Tesla did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for comment.

What happens to Cybertruck production?

The key unanswered question is whether the truck survives anywhere else. Musk did not say whether Cybertruck production would shift to another facility, and the reports note that the Austin-area plant is the only known Tesla factory set up to build it. That plant also makes the Model Y and the Cybercab, so the Cybertruck is competing for floor space with products Tesla considers more central to its future.

When a user on X called the news the “end of an era,” Musk agreed and again called the Cybertruck the “best vehicle Tesla has ever made.” He added that “the Cybertruck fleet will be around for a long time,” a nod to the trucks already on the road.

A sales story that never matched the hype

The numbers help explain the decision. Musk predicted before launch that annual sales could reach 250,000 units. Estimates cited by CNBC and Fox Business, attributed to Cox Automotive and Kelley Blue Book, put U.S. Cybertruck sales last year at 20,237, down 48% from 38,965 in 2024. That is a small fraction of the original forecast. Tesla does not break out sales by model, so these figures are estimates rather than company-reported data.

One notable buyer was SpaceX, Musk’s aerospace company, which according to a company financial filing spent $131 million on Cybertrucks at Tesla’s suggested retail price. Decrypt’s report framed the move as a response to sales running well below the plant’s capacity.

The truck also had a bumpy road. Deliveries began in late 2023 after years of delays, and the federal safety regulator’s website lists 11 recalls. They range from a “trapped” accelerator pedal risk that could cause unintended acceleration to software defects and an inverter fault that could cause sudden loss of drive power. Some were fixed with over-the-air software updates, and others needed physical repairs. CNBC also noted that the truck’s specifications fell short of what Tesla advertised early on, and in some cases trailed rival gas-powered pickups.

The vehicle’s image became tangled in politics as well. After Musk’s high-profile role in Donald Trump’s campaign and the Department of Government Efficiency, some owners reported harassment on the road, according to CNBC’s reporting.

Betting on robotaxis

The shift fits Tesla’s broader pivot toward autonomy. Fox Business reported that Tesla plans to launch a Cybercab service in Dallas next month and to expand its autonomous transportation network, while Musk said vehicle demand is outpacing production as Full Self-Driving gains traction. Those claims come from Musk and Tesla and have not been independently verified in the reports.

Tech-focused coverage suggested the announcement has unsettled some fans, who worry other Tesla models could eventually be cut too. The reports offer no evidence of such plans. For now, the confirmed facts are narrower: the Cybertruck has about eight months left on the Texas line, and Tesla is clearing space for the robotaxi it believes will define its next chapter.

Explore more on this topic with Vexel Search.

File photo: 2024 Tesla Cybertruck, Moab 02.jpg by A1C6, CC0, via Wikimedia Commons.

Header image: AI-generated illustration by WordUp News.

The October jobs report delivered a clear upside surprise: U.S. employers added 165,000 jobs last month, more than two and a half times the 65,000 that economists polled by LSEG had forecast. The Bureau of Labor Statistics released the figures on Friday, November 6.

The unemployment rate edged down to 4.1%. Economists had expected it to hold at 4.2%. The data points to a labor market that regained momentum after a weak September.

Revisions make the October jobs report look stronger

The headline number was not the only good news. The BLS revised its estimates for the previous two months upward. August’s gain went from 133,000 to 186,000, an increase of 53,000. September’s went from 29,000 to 60,000, an increase of 31,000. Together, the revisions mean employment in those two months was 84,000 higher than first reported.

The revisions matter because September had looked soft against a backdrop of economic uncertainty. With the new figures, that month looks less like a stall and more like a modest slowdown. It still was the weakest of the three months covered by the revised data.

Where the jobs came from

Nearly all of October’s growth came from the private sector. Private payrolls rose by 159,000, well above the 64,000 economists expected. Government payrolls added 6,000. Within government, state governments added 8,000 jobs, while the federal government and local governments each cut 1,000.

Several industries stood out:

• Professional and business services added 70,000 jobs, far above its average monthly gain of 15,000 over the past year. Professional, scientific and technical services contributed 32,900, and administrative, support and waste management services added 28,100.
• Healthcare added 41,600 jobs, compared with a 12-month average of 31,000. Hospitals (+16,000), home healthcare services (+10,500) and outpatient care centers (+4,800) led the way.
• Manufacturing gained 19,000 jobs, well above the 5,000 economists had predicted. September’s manufacturing gain was revised up from 9,000 to 13,000.
• Transportation and warehousing added 24,800 jobs, driven by couriers and messengers (+17,400) and air transportation (+3,500).

What to make of the numbers

A single month can mislead, and the forecast of 65,000 suggests economists were braced for a weak reading. Monthly payroll data is also revised often, as the September and August changes show. Still, the breadth of the October jobs report is notable. Gains were not confined to one corner of the economy. Healthcare, which has been a steady source of hiring, grew faster than its recent pace. Manufacturing, which can be volatile, beat forecasts. Professional and business services posted a gain far above its recent average.

The report’s source material does not say whether the strength will last, and the underlying data leaves open questions. The professional services surge, for example, is many times its yearly average, a sign it may not repeat. For now, the October jobs report gives a more encouraging picture than forecasters expected, with more hiring, lower unemployment and a stronger recent trend than previously reported.

Explore more on this topic with Vexel Search.