Astell&Kern doesn’t dabble at the shallow end of the pool. The Korean brand has spent years defining the upper tier of the digital audio player market, pushing prices into territory where performance, build quality, and long-term relevance actually matter. The PD10 lands squarely in the upper tier at $2,749 with the dock ($2,410 without it), placing it in direct competition with the most serious portable players available. At nearly three grand, sound quality and prestige are no longer enough. At this level, Astell&Kern isn’t competing on specs alone—it’s competing on purpose.
The high-end DAP market is brutally competitive right now, and Astell&Kern is leading the charge; but leadership alone isn’t enough when buyers have real alternatives and very high expectations. The real question isn’t whether the PD10 sounds good; that’s table stakes at this level. The question is whether this is just another ultra-luxury portable player for headphones and IEMs, or whether Astell&Kern has built something with a broader mission in mind—something that makes sense not only on the move, but also alongside a serious home two-channel system.
PD10 Technical Overview: Power, Connectivity, and Storage
The PD10’s specifications aren’t about box-checking or bragging rights. They exist to solve real-world use cases—driving sensitive IEMs, powering full-size headphones, and functioning as a legitimate digital source beyond portable duty.
The 6-inch 1080×2160 IPS display gives the PD10 a modern, smartphone-like interface that’s responsive and easy to navigate, which matters when you’re dealing with large libraries and multiple playback modes. Output power is substantial: in low gain, the PD10 delivers 2.6Vrms from the unbalanced output and 5.6Vrms balanced, keeping noise under control for high-efficiency IEMs. Switch to high gain and those numbers jump to 4Vrms unbalanced and a very serious 8.3Vrms balanced—enough voltage to comfortably drive high-impedance and current-hungry headphones without external amplification.
Output impedance stays sensibly low at 1 ohm from the 3.5mm jack and 1.6 ohms from the 4.4mm balanced output, which means stable frequency response and predictable behavior with multi-driver IEMs. At the heart of the PD10 is a no-nonsense AKM DAC implementation, pairing dual AKM4191EQ modulators with four AKM4498EX DACs. This multi-chip approach isn’t about marketing—it allows Astell&Kern to separate digital and analog stages more effectively, reducing noise and preserving dynamic range in both portable and docked use.
Advertisement
Astell&Kern’s Advanced DAR (Digital Audio Remaster) is an optional two-stage processing system that upsamples audio before it reaches the DAC. It can be enabled or disabled at will, and whether it’s useful depends on the source material and listener preference.
The first stage uses A&K’s VSE (Virtual Sound Extender) processing to reconstruct missing harmonic information before upsampling. The second stage performs the actual conversion. PCM files in the 44.1kHz family are upsampled to 352.8kHz, while 48kHz-based files are converted to 384kHz. DSD files are left untouched in PCM mode.
When DSD conversion is selected, PCM files below 96kHz are converted to DSD128, higher-rate PCM files are converted to DSD256, and native DSD below DSD256 is also converted to DSD256. DAR never exceeds the PD10’s supported playback limits and avoids unnecessary processing.
DAR is strictly optional. Leave it off for native playback, or use it selectively if you prefer the presentation it brings to certain recordings.
Advertisement
Connectivity is current, but not exhaustive. Dual-band Wi-Fi (2.4 and 5GHz) ensures reliable high-resolution streaming, and Bluetooth 5.3 support includes aptX HD, LDAC, LHDC, AAC, and SBC. What’s notably absent, however, is aptX Lossless, a codec that’s starting to appear on competing high-end portable devices. For wired listeners, this omission won’t matter. For those expecting the latest Bluetooth standards at this price, it’s worth flagging.
Storage is generous out of the box at 256GB and expandable up to 1.5TB via microSD, which is essential for anyone sitting on a large hi-res or DSD library. Physically, the PD10 is unapologetically substantial. At just under 6 inches tall, nearly 3 inches wide, and weighing roughly 15.3 ounces, it’s clearly built for stability and performance rather than pocket-friendly minimalism. Powering all of this is a 5,770mAh battery, sized to support long listening sessions despite the high output stages and large display.
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Taken together, these specs point to a player that’s designed to do more than just sound good on the go. The PD10 has the power, connectivity, and architectural headroom to operate as a serious digital front end—whether it’s feeding headphones, IEMs, or a larger system through its dock.
Advertisement
File Support, Bit-Perfect Playback, and Output Choices
The PD10’s file support makes it clear who this player is designed for. It handles every major lossless and lossy format that actually matters—WAV, FLAC, AIFF, ALAC, APE, and AAC—alongside legacy formats like MP3 and WMA for anyone with older libraries. More importantly, native DSD support extends all the way up to DSD512, covering DSD64, 128, and 256 without conversion. That puts the PD10 squarely in “bring your entire archive” territory, not just high-res streaming playlists.
On the PCM side, support runs from 8kHz to a frankly excessive 768kHz at up to 32-bit depth. While very few real-world recordings exist at the top end of that range, the takeaway isn’t bragging rights—it’s headroom. The PD10 is capable of bit-perfect playback without resampling or truncation, which matters if you’re particular about preserving the integrity of your files from storage to output.
USB-C serves double duty here, handling charging as well as data for PC and Mac connections. Used this way, the PD10 can function as an external DAC, extending its usefulness well beyond portable playback and reinforcing its role as a flexible digital source.
Output options are practical and well chosen. The 3.5mm jack covers both unbalanced headphone output and optical digital output, allowing the PD10 to feed an external DAC or integrated amplifier in a home system. Balanced output is handled via a 4.4mm five-pole connection, which has become the de facto standard at this level and avoids the fragility and channel-matching issues of older balanced formats.
Advertisement
Taken together, the PD10’s format support and output flexibility point to a player that isn’t just designed to sound good on headphones. It’s meant to sit comfortably at the center of a serious digital library and transition easily between portable listening and fixed-system use—without forcing compromises or workarounds.
Build Quality That Matches the Asking Price?
Astell&Kern’s biggest selling point has always been its command of industrial design and materials. One look at their players tells you they aren’t inexpensive—and the PD10 continues that tradition, even as it makes a few deliberate departures from past models. Longtime owners will immediately notice the absence of the scroll wheel found on many earlier A&K designs. It’s a controversial move for some, but in day-to-day use it doesn’t meaningfully impact usability. In its place is a set of stainless-steel buttons mounted along the right side of the chassis.
Visually, those polished buttons look the part. Tactilely, they fall just short. They have a slight amount of play and can rattle faintly, which is noticeable and disappointing on a device at this price. Small details matter when you’re spending several thousand dollars. Thankfully, that’s the extent of my criticism. The USB-C port is solid and secure, the microSD card slot inspires confidence, and the chassis itself feels dense and well assembled.
If the looseness of the side buttons bothers you, the included leather case effectively masks the issue. It’s precisely cut, comfortable in hand, and finished to a level that feels appropriate for the PD10. Astell&Kern even varies the texture around the button area, making it easy to locate controls by touch alone—an appreciated detail that shows the company is still thinking about real-world use, not just shelf appeal.
Advertisement
The PD10’s status-light power button is a thoughtful touch. It remains off when playback is stopped and changes color to reflect different operating states. In practice, however, the implementation could use refinement. There’s no quick way to dim or disable the light, which becomes an issue in low-light environments. As shipped, the LEDs are bright enough to be distracting—and in a dark room, potentially disruptive to anyone trying to sleep.
The Price Is Fixed. The Features Aren’t.
Digital audio sources hit the point of diminishing returns well before $2,700. In 2026, portable audio makes that especially clear, with capable DACs and premium dongles pushing that threshold closer to $200. The PD10 only makes sense if it goes beyond raw specifications—and that’s where Astell&Kern makes its case.
Rather than chasing numbers, the PD10 layers a broad feature set onto a solid technical foundation. Alongside its integrated 256GB of storage, it supports Roon, Qobuz Connect, LDAC, and aptX HD, with access to a wide range of streaming services via the Google Play Store. Wireless playback can be handled through AirPlay, while local file management is simplified through AK File Drop, allowing FTP transfers across a home network without plugging anything in.
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
At this price, you’re not paying for incremental sonic gains alone. You’re paying for integration, flexibility, and the kind of polish that turns a capable digital player into a genuinely high-end experience—one that feels considered rather than cobbled together.
Advertisement
The Full-ish Android Experience
One of the PD10’s more compelling features is its access to the Google Play Store. Few high-end audio players offer this level of openness, and those that do often burden third-party apps with restrictions that make everyday use frustrating. On the PD10, Play Store access is handled cleanly and without ceremony. Sign in to a Google account, tap the shortcut, and you’re in—no workarounds required.
From there, installing a familiar set of Android apps is straightforward. I used Microsoft Word for note-taking and set up Syncthing to automate real-time synchronization of my music library with a home media server. Even with relatively heavy background processes running, the PD10 remained responsive and stable, with no audible impact on playback. It behaves like a mature Android device first—and a high-end audio player that just happens to run Android second, which is exactly how it should be.
The Death of a Streamer
You can opt to purchase the PD10 with its all-metal cradle, and this is where the product stops behaving like a conventional DAP. The cradle allows the PD10 to dock much like a Nintendo Switch, routing audio directly to a speaker system or receiver. In practice, it turns the PD10 into a steel-clad, Android-enabled streamer—one that happens to detach and leave the room with you.
Docking is seamless and largely foolproof, provided you’re not using the leather case, and the PD10 automatically switches to XLR output mode without drama. Output from the dock measures a healthy 5.6Vrms, which is sufficient to drive most power amplifiers directly, eliminating the need for a separate preamp. That level of integration isn’t a gimmick—it’s the PD10’s strongest differentiator and a compelling reason to choose it over both cheaper and more expensive Astell&Kern alternatives.
By allowing the PD10 to function either as a premium handheld player or a fixed streamer in a speaker-based system, Astell&Kern has addressed a real-world use case. Audiophiles who split their time between headphones, speakers, and long car rides can maintain a consistent interface and sound signature across all of it without duplicating hardware or compromising convenience.
Advertisement
Listening
Docking and streaming aside, the core job of any DAP is straightforward: play locally stored audio files through IEMs and headphones without getting in the way. Most of my time with the PD10 was spent focused on exactly that. In practice, it powered nearly everything I threw at it without complaint. I took it to CES 2026, where it had no trouble with sensitive IEMs and handled planar headphones with ease. More demanding full-size models; particularly some from Dan Clark Audio, do ask for more current than the PD10 can comfortably deliver, which is worth noting if those are your daily drivers.
The PD10’s low and predictable output impedance makes it especially well suited to IEM use, including models with complex passive crossovers. Higher output impedances can interact with those crossovers and subtly alter frequency response. With the PD10, that simply didn’t happen. My most sensitive multi-driver IEM, the Campfire Audio Andromeda, sounded dynamic, smooth, and warm—exactly as intended. The player imposed no audible character of its own, which is precisely what you want from a high-end source.
I also stress-tested the PD10’s file handling by aggressively scrubbing through large local AIFF and WAV files. Skipping to random points in massive files was instant, with no buffering or hesitation. That kind of responsiveness suggests Astell&Kern didn’t cut corners on internal storage quality—a detail that matters more than it gets credit for in real-time playback scenarios. Cheap or slow storage has a way of revealing itself quickly here, and the PD10 never gave me a reason to question it.
This Is Not a Flagship Smartphone
Despite costing more than most flagship smartphones, the Astell&Kern PD10 is not built on cutting-edge mobile hardware. That distinction matters. While Astell&Kern clearly prioritizes audio components and does so successfully, the company relies on lower-tier system-on-chip and compute hardware to get there. The result is a device that sounds exceptional but behaves very differently from a modern phone.
Discerning mobile users will notice it immediately. The PD10’s display is sharp and vibrant, but touch responsiveness lags behind even relatively affordable smartphones. Compared to devices like the Asus Zenfone 9 or Google Pixel 10 Pro, the PD10 feels slower and less fluid. Part of that comes down to modern phones running 120Hz displays, but it’s also a consequence of conservative hardware choices under the hood.
Advertisement
None of this makes the PD10 unusable—far from it. Its interface is perfectly adequate for its primary job: selecting music and playing it reliably. But for users accustomed to high-end smartphones, the difference in responsiveness is noticeable and occasionally frustrating, especially when navigating with more complex touch gestures. It’s a reminder that the PD10 is an audio-first device that happens to run Android, not a luxury smartphone replacement—and expectations should be set accordingly.
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
The Bottom Line
The PD10 isn’t perfect, and it isn’t priced to be forgiven for much. What it delivers—long battery life, a vanishingly low noise floor, and enough output power for the vast majority of real-world headphones and IEMs—it delivers with confidence. But the real differentiator isn’t sound quality alone. It’s the dock.
With its all-metal cradle, the PD10 stops being just another high-end DAP and becomes something closer to a modular digital source. Docked, it operates as a capable, Android-based streamer with XLR output and enough voltage to drive most power amplifiers directly, sidelining traditional streamers in the process. That single feature fundamentally separates it from alternatives in Astell&Kern’s own lineup and from competitors alike.
For buyers focused strictly on portable performance, there are clear options. Astell&Kern’s own SP4000 offers higher outright output and refinement as a pure DAP, while players like the iBasso DX340 deliver strong performance at a lower cost. Likewise, anyone already invested in a dedicated streamer may find little justification for replacing it.
Advertisement
Sound wise, the PD10 belongs exactly where Astell&Kern priced it. It delivers the refined, low noise, high resolution presentation expected from top tier DAPs, and in several cases it equals or exceeds the sound quality of dedicated streamers I have tested. That matters, because without that level of performance the rest of the PD10’s argument falls apart. It does not.
The PD10 only makes sense for a very specific audiophile, and Astell&Kern is not pretending otherwise. $2,750 is serious money, but Astell&Kern buyers already understand that reality. If you are strictly a portable listener or strictly a two channel listener, there are cheaper and in some cases better options available. But for listeners who genuinely split time between headphones on the move and a serious speaker system at home, the PD10 does something few products attempt. It replaces multiple components without compromising sound quality, usability, or overall polish. That combination of performance, Android flexibility, and cradle based system integration is what gives the PD10 its value and why for the right listener it stands alone.
Pros:
Excellent sound quality with an imperceptible noise floor
Plenty of output power for most IEMs and full-size headphones
Low, stable output impedance makes it ideal for sensitive multi-driver IEMs
Extensive format support, including native DSD up to DSD512 and high-rate PCM
Unrestricted Google Play Store access with stable performance
Smooth handling of large local files and high-quality internal storage
Roon Ready, Qobuz Connect, AirPlay, LDAC, aptX HD
Optional cradle transforms the PD10 into home hi-fi streamer
Can drive power amplifiers directly when docked, eliminating the need for a preamp
Premium materials and overall build quality appropriate for the price
Well-executed leather case included
Cons:
Very expensive, with limited value for price-to-performance focused buyers
Does not support aptX Lossless, Spotify Connect, TIDAL Connect
Android performance lags behind modern flagship smartphones
Touchscreen latency can be noticeable to experienced smartphone users
Side buttons exhibit slight looseness and rattle
Status-light power button is too bright with no easy way to dim or disable it
Product designer Matty Benedetto discovered some clips of passengers stranded in airport security lines and clogged airport terminals. He determined that his next trip needed to be less of a nightmare, so he set out to design a carry-on suitcase that would make the entire experience a little less stressful. More specifically, he decided to create one from scratch using his 3D printers.
He tailored the dimensions of his carry-on to normal sizes so that it would pass through security inspections without a second thought. Then he divided the bag’s main body into two parts with overlapping edges to provide strength, and printed a few test copies with some colorful leftover filament to check how the pieces fit together. Putting it all together was like snapping a load of large plastic bricks into place, except he added metal hinges for the lid and a telescoping handle constructed from off-the-shelf components. During a print halt, ball bearings were inserted into the wheels to ensure that they roll smoothly without the need for any additional equipment.
【High-end Quality】The suitcase is made of THREE-LAYER Covestro PC which is extremely scratch-resistant, it goes through insanely strict producing…
【One-Piece Side Opening Design】The design is different from the traditional way of opening and closing the suitcase in half, which is more…
【Multifunctional Holder Design】Especially designed water cup holder, phone holder located in top of luggage and the handle hook. If you enjoy…
After determining the basic shape, he went on to the details that would make a long wait more bearable. A flat panel folds out from the front and includes a little latch to secure it in place, allowing you to prop up your laptop during a layover. A MagSafe mount appears next to it to hold your phone, allowing you to watch shows or check your messages without taking your hands off the wheel. When you’re stuck waiting for a delayed flight, it’s usually a good idea to have some food with you, so he included a little jar that twists open easily from the side, allowing you to access your goodies without having to unzip the main zipper.
Advertisement
On a long journey, coffee can pose a serious security issue, spilling all over the place and causing a huge mess. To avoid this kind of disaster, he created a cup holder with a sophisticated gimbal inside that maintains your drink level even when the bag tilts. On the outside, he incorporated a rotating dial that displays the flight number, weather prediction, destination details, and a few emergency contacts at a glance. And for further peace of mind, he designed the feet to detach so you can put an AirTag inside each one, which is entirely out of sight but provides some extra protection against losing your luggage.
The first major test was security, when his luggage breezed through the X-ray machine with no one blinking an eyelash about its printed design. Next, he had to get it into a regional flight, which proved difficult until he gave it a gentle nudge into the overhead bin, where it slipped in without incident. The smooth rolling was due to the ball bearings, and the entire setup weighed about the same as a conventional carry-on.
However, when he arrived at his destination, things became a little more problematic. There were hairline cracks all along the main seam, one of the wheels had broken free during the journey, the snacks in the jar had turned to crumbs, and a couple of the smaller attachments had vanished; not a bad outcome, all things considered.
The Russian military is once again hacking home and small office routers in widespread operations that send unwitting users to sites that harvest passwords and credential tokens for use in espionage campaigns, researchers said Tuesday.
An estimated 18,000 to 40,000 consumer routers, mostly those made by MikroTik and TP-Link, located in 120 countries, were wrangled into infrastructure belonging to APT28, an advanced threat group that’s part of Russia’s military intelligence agency known as the GRU, researchers from Lumen Technologies’ Black Lotus Labs said. The threat group has operated for at least two decades and is behind dozens of high-profile hacks targeting governments worldwide. APT28 is also tracked under names including Pawn Storm, Sofacy Group, Sednit, Tsar Team, Forest Blizzard, and STRONTIUM.
A small number of routers were used as proxies to connect to a much larger number of other routers belonging to foreign ministries, law enforcement, and government agencies that APT28 wanted to spy on. The group then used its control of routers to change DNS lookups for select websites, including, Microsoft said, domains for the company’s 365 service.
“Known for blending cutting-edge tools such as the large language model (LLM) ‘LAMEHUG’ with proven, longstanding techniques, Forest Blizzard consistently evolves its tactics to stay ahead of defenders,” Black Lotus researchers wrote. “Their previous and current campaigns highlight both their technological sophistication and their willingness to revisit classic attack methods even after public exposure, underscoring the ongoing risk posed by this actor to organizations worldwide.”
Advertisement
To hijack the routers, the attackers exploited older models that hadn’t been patched against known security vulnerabilities. They then changed DNS settings for select domains and used the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol to propagate them to router-connected workstations. When connected devices visited the selected domains, their connections were proxied through malicious servers before reaching their intended destination.
From ancient lunar lava to personal tributes, the new images released from the Artemis II space mission capture fresh perspectives of our celestial neighbour.
Yesterday (7 April), NASA released the first images of the moon captured by the Artemis II astronauts during their historic test flight.
The Artemis II mission took off last week (1 April) from the Kennedy Space Center in Florida, beginning an approximately 10-day mission for NASA astronauts Reid Wiseman, Victor Glover, Christina Koch and Canadian Space Agency astronaut Jeremy Hansen.
Yesterday’s images were taken on 6 April during the crew’s seven-hour pass over the lunar far side – the first crewed lunar flyby in more than 50 years – and provide a fresh look at Earth’s closest celestial neighbour.
Advertisement
From an eclipse to ancient lava, here is just a handful of some of the most interesting images captured by the Artemis II crew so far.
Near and far
A picture capturing two-thirds of the moon. Towards the bottom of the image, the Orientale basin can be seen. North-east of the Orientale, seen as a dark spot, is the Grimaldi crater. Image: NASA
One of the crew’s most striking images captures two-thirds of the moon, showcasing the “intricate features of the near side”, according to NASA. The 600-mile-wide impact crater, the Orientale basin, lies along the transition between the near and far sides and can be seen at the bottom of the image.
The round black spot north-east of Orientale is the Grimaldi crater, known for its exceptionally “dark mare lava floor and heavily degraded rim”.
Advertisement
In-space eclipse
The moon fully eclipsing the sun, as taken by the Artemis II crew. Image: NASA
One of the most unique images taken by the Artemis II crew captures the moon fully eclipsing the sun. The corona of the sun forms a glowing halo around the moon, while light reflected off Earth forms a faint, glowing outline of the near side of the moon.
Nearly 54 minutes of totality – when the moon completely blocks the bright face of the sun – was observed by the crew.
Stars are also visible around the spectacle, which are typically too faint to see when imaging the moon, but are readily visible with the moon in darkness.
Advertisement
“This unique vantage point provides both a striking visual and a valuable opportunity for astronauts to document and describe the corona during humanity’s return to deep space,” according to NASA.
A different perspective
Earth in a crescent phase showing the cutoff between day and night on the planet, as seen from the Artemis II spacecraft as it conducted the lunar flyby. Image: NASA
Another image captured during the lunar flyby shows Earth split between daytime and nighttime.
Earth can be seen in a crescent phase, with sunlight coming from the right of the image. On the day side, swirling clouds are visible over the Australia and Oceania region.
Advertisement
Meanwhile, the lines of small indentations seen on the moon’s surface to the left of the image are secondary crater chains. These structures are formed by material ejected during a violent primary impact.
Ancient lava
A close-up snapshot of the moon as the crew approached for the flyby. The Aristarchus crater is the bright white dot in the middle of a dark grey lava flow at the top of the image. Image: NASA
In one close-up shot of the moon’s surface, taken as the NASA Orion spacecraft approached for the lunar flyby, an interesting ancient remnant can be observed.
According to NASA, dark patches visible on the top third of the lunar disc represent ancient lava.
Advertisement
Meanwhile, the bright white dot in the middle of a dark grey lava flow at the top of the image is the Aristarchus crater, which measures at a depth of 2.7km – making it deeper than the Grand Canyon.
A personal tribute
A picture of the Orientale basin, seen in the middle right of the image. The first crater named by the crew, called Integrity, lies just above the centre of the image. North of the Orientale at the top right corner of the image is the Glushko crater. To the north-west of that is the second crew-named crater, seen as a bright white spot, which the crew has called Carroll. Image: NASA
During the mission’s lunar flyby observation period, the Artemis II crew snapped an image showing the rings of the Orientale basin, one of the moon’s youngest and best-preserved large impact craters.
According to NASA, these concentric rings offer scientists a rare window into how massive impacts shape planetary surfaces, “helping refine models of crater formation and the moon’s geologic history”.
Advertisement
At the 10 o’clock position of the Orientale basin, two smaller craters are visible. The Artemis II astronauts submitted names for these two craters for approval by the International Astronomical Union: the first being Integrity, named after the crew’s spacecraft; and the second being Carroll, named after mission commander Reid Wiseman’s late wife.
“A number of years ago, we started this journey in our close-knit astronaut family and we lost a loved one,” said mission specialist Hansen to mission control at the time of the proposal. “And there is a feature in a really neat place on the moon, and it is on the near side/far side boundary. In fact, it’s just on the near side of that boundary, and so at certain times of the moon’s transit around Earth, we will be able to see this from Earth.
“And so we lost a loved one. Her name was Carroll, the spouse of Reid, the mother of Katie and Ellie. And if you want to find this one, you look at Glushko, and it’s just to the northwest of that, at the same latitude as Ohm, and it’s a bright spot on the moon. And we would like to call it Carroll.”
‘A human story’
Eight days into the Artemis II mission, and a number of remarkable moments have been observed in humanity’s latest major space voyage, including the crew surpassing the record for human spaceflight’s farthest distance at 248,655 miles from Earth.
Advertisement
But for many, the human side of the voyage – such as the crew’s sentimental proposal to name a crater – have stuck as dually important alongside the mission’s technical feats.
This rings true with award-winning Irish scientist Dr Niamh Shaw, who was present on the Kennedy Space Center’s media lawn for the historic launch.
“Space has always been a kind of compass in my life,” she told SiliconRepublic.com. “It has a way of stripping everything back, reminding me of what matters, of how small we are and how extraordinary it is that we are here at all.
“It keeps me grounded in my questions. In curiosity. In wonder. And also in responsibility. Because one of the things space teaches us, very clearly, is that there is no rescue mission coming for Earth. No one arriving to solve our problems.”
Advertisement
Shaw told us that what struck her just as much as the launch itself was “what happened afterwards”.
“The level of interest, the appetite for connection … People want to understand, to feel part of it, to ask questions,” she explained.
“I haven’t stopped: media calls, messages, Zooms with my Town Scientist families.
“And I found myself trying to share it in a way that made it personal for them – sending photos, describing moments, answering questions,” she added.
Advertisement
“Because I genuinely believe that’s where the real impact lies. Not just in the engineering achievement, extraordinary as it is. But in how it reaches people.
“In how it shifts perspective, even slightly. In how it reminds us that we are all part of something much bigger and that the story of space exploration is, ultimately, a human story.”
Don’t miss out on the knowledge you need to succeed. Sign up for the Daily Brief, Silicon Republic’s digest of need-to-know sci-tech news.
Microsoft has pushed a server-side fix for a known issue that broke the Windows Start Menu search feature on some Windows 11 23H2 devices.
In a Windows release health update (WI1273488) seen by BleepingComputer, Microsoft said these problems have affected only a small number of users since April 6 and are caused by a server-side Bing update aimed at improving search performance.
While the company says these problems are recent, there have been reports of similar issues surfacing online for months, including claims that the Start Menu displays blank search results that are still clickable.
To address this known issue, Microsoft has pulled the buggy Bing update and expects the search issues to subside as the fix rolls out to affected customers.
“An investigation determined that the problem coincided with a server-side Bing update designed to improve search performance. To mitigate the issue, the server-side Bing update was rolled back, and reports of search failures are steadily decreasing,” Microsoft said.
Advertisement
“This issue will resolve automatically as the server-side fix is gradually rolled out to affected devices. To receive this fix, make sure the device is connected to the internet and that Web Search has not been disabled by Group Policy.”
More Windows Start Menu issues
This isn’t the first known Start Menu issue to impact Windows customers in recent years. In November, Microsoft shared a temporary workaround for another bug that was causing the Start Menu, File Explorer, and other key system components to crash when provisioning systems with cumulative updates released since July 2025, due to XAML packages not registering in time after installing the update.
On impacted systems, affected users experience a wide range of problems, including Start menu crashes and critical error messages, missing taskbars even when Explorer is running, crashes of the core ShellHost (Shell Infrastructure Host or Windows Shell Experience Host) system process, and Settings app silently failing to launch.
Microsoft is still working on developing a permanent fix, but hasn’t provided a timeline for when a solution will be available. Meanwhile, affected customers must manually register the missing XAML packages.
Automated pentesting proves the path exists. BAS proves whether your controls stop it. Most teams run one without the other.
This whitepaper maps six validation surfaces, shows where coverage ends, and provides practitioners with three diagnostic questions for any tool evaluation.
I’ve always been an Ikea fan. I lived in nine different apartments over 15 years before moving into my home, and every single one of those places had an abundance of Ikea furnishings. But the latest thing from Ikea that’s been catching my eye isn’t the new bold blue shade for the Billy bookcase, but the brand’s expanded and upgraded smart home gear.
Ikea announced last year that its new lineup of smart home gadgets would be entirely Matter-compatible. That’s a big deal, as the open source interoperability standard has Amazon, Apple, and Google signed up, meaning these devices will play well with Alexa, Siri, and Google’s nameless voice assistant. While some of this gear has been available for a little while, much of the lineup—like the newest light bulbs and smart plugs—is new. These are now some of the most affordable smart home gadgets available, and from my experience, they also some of the best when it comes to ease of setup and price.
Ikea is still using its Dirigera Hub ($110) that launched a few years ago, so if you’re already an Ikea smart home user, you won’t need a new hub to start using these gadgets. But new users should pick one up if they don’t have a Thread-enabled, Matter-compatible smart home hub in their home.
Here’s what gear I’ve tried from Ikea’s new smart home collection, and how it went.
Advertisement
The Kajplats Bulb
Photograph: Nena Farrell
One of Ikea’s key new products, just launched this April, is a new light bulb. Smart light bulbs are one of the most-used items in my home, and this is one of the most accessible and useful smart home products out there.
The Kajplats bulb was easy to set up around my house, and because I’m an iPhone user, it also used Matter to sync to my Apple Home app as well as my Ikea app. I wish these came in more packs of bulbs rather than having to always buy them a la carte, but it’s a solid bulb for a good price. Just check the lumens before you check out to make sure you’re not accidentally buying the cheap, dim one when you need something bright enough to fill a room.
Rolling out from April 7 on desktop Chrome (download here), the vertical tabs feature gives users the option to move the browser’s tab strip from the top of the window to a sidebar on the left. Read Entire Article Source link
“Once, men turned their thinking over to machines in the hope that this would set them free. But that only permitted other men with machines to enslave them.” — so said [Frank Herbert] in his magnum opus, Dune, or rather in the OC Bible that made up part of the book’s rich worldbuilding. A recent study demonstrating “cognitive surrender” in large language model (LLM) users, as reported in Ars Technica, is going to add more fuel to that Butlerian fire.
Cognitive surrender is, in short, exactly what [Herbert] was warning of: giving over your thinking to machines. In the study, people were asked a series of questions, and — except for the necessary “brain-only” control group — given access to a rigged LLM to help them answer. It was rigged in that it would give wrong answers 50% of the time, which while higher than most LLMs, only a difference in degree, not in kind. Hallucination is unavoidable; here it was just made controllably frequent for the sake of the study.
The hallucinations in the study were errors that the participants should have been able to see through, if they’d thought about the answers. Eighty percent of the time, they did not. That is to say: presented with an obviously wrong answer from the machine, only in 20% of cases did the participants bother to question it. The remainder were experiencing what the researchers dubbed “cognitive surrender”: they turned their thinking over to the machines. There’s a lot more meat to this than we can summarize here, of course, but the whole paper is available free for your perusal.
Giving over thinking to machines is nothing new, of course; it’s probably been a couple decades since the first person drove into a lake on faulty GPS directions, for example. One might even argue that since LLMs are correct much more than 50% of the time, it is statistically wise to listen to them. In that case, however, one might be encouraged to read Dune.
Google Photos has finally caught up with a feature that iOS has had for years. A new Copy button is now rolling out in the Google Photos share sheet. It lets you copy an image straight to the clipboard, without having to download it to your device first (via Android Authority).
Nadeem Sarwar / DigitalTrends
What exactly does the new Google Photos feature do?
Until now, sharing a photo from Google Photos wasn’t as straightforward. First, you had to store the picture locally on your phone, which meant waiting for it to download before you could actually send it anywhere.
Now, you can argue that a second of waiting doesn’t sound like much. However, Google Photos users had to go through the same process every single time. That’s a second multiplied by the number of times you try to share a photo each day.
The new Copy button, spotted across multiple devices running the latest Google Photos version (7.71.0.895417930), eliminates that friction. You can simply tap Share on any image, hit the new Copy button, and the photo lands on your phone’s clipboard, good for pasting into a messaging app, a notes app, or wherever you want it to be.
Nadeem Sarwar / DigitalTrends
Does the new Google Photos feature have a catch?
Unfortunately, yes, and I’d prefer you know it upfront rather than realizing it later. The copied image isn’t a pixel-perfect copy of the original one. To keep things quick and efficient, Google Photos copies a compressed version of the picture, with a slightly reduced resolution.
So, for casual sharing, the new Copy button does perfectly fine. However, I wouldn’t suggest relying on the feature for professional use or printing something. You’re better off spending those few extra seconds and downloading the entire file.
Advertisement
On the brighter side, the new Google Photos Copy button works for videos too. Furthermore, if you’re using Gboard, copied media appears in the keyboard’s clipboard, remaining there even after you’ve copied something else.
A new company needs to make a strong first impression. For Fender Audio, a new outfit owned by the legendary Fender Musical Instruments Corporation but operated by Riffsound, that introduction comes in the form of two speakers and a set of headphones. The Elie 6 ($300) and Elie 12 ($400) are portable Bluetooth speakers with sophisticated designs and unique features, offering similar functionality in two different sizes. These devices are essentially speaker/amplifier hybrids, since they both have ¼-inch/XLR combo inputs among their connections. Despite the unique mix of connectivity, the speakers still need to sound good and work well to compete with the many excellent portable options available today.
Fender Audio/Engadget
The Elie 12 is a large, powerful portable speaker with plenty of inputs, but weight and battery life could be deal breakers for some.
Pros
Advertisement
Excellent audio clarity
Four inputs
Refined design
Cons
IP rated but there’s exposed wood
Big and heavy
No app for customization
Battery life lags behind top competition
Fender Audio
The Elie 6 punches above its size in audio clarity and connectivity, but it’s heavy for such a small speaker and some competitors offer better battery life.
Pros
Excellent audio clarity
Four inputs
Refined design
Cons
IP rated but there’s exposed wood
Limited playback controls
No app for customization
Battery life lags behind top competition
The good: Design, inputs and overall clarity
The first time I saw the Elie 6 and Elie 12 in person, my eyes were immediately drawn to the design. These certainly don’t look like your typical Bluetooth speakers. That’s due in large part to the refined, almost retro look that’s consistent across both models. The Elie duo are products you won’t mind showing off, while many portable speakers are too flashy or brightly colored to be kept in a prominent place.
All of the onboard controls are clearly labeled physical buttons or dials, so you’re not left wondering how anything works. Around back, both the Elie 6 and Elie 12 have combo ¼-inch/XLR inputs (with 48V phantom power) as well as buttons for two wireless inputs and a 3.5mm line out. That combo jack means both speakers can double as amps, and the dual wireless connections allow you to sync microphones for karaoke sessions or hosting trivia night. This expanded functionality speaks to Fender’s history as a guitar icon, but it also gives the Elie speakers an upper hand over much of the competition at these sizes. Typically if you want these types of inputs, you’ll need to consider a much larger party box-style speaker to get them.
Advertisement
Before I move on from the controls and inputs, I need to mention the dedicated three-way mode switch for single, stereo and multi-speaker uses. This is so much easier than what’s on most portable speakers, which usually entails some weird dance with Bluetooth pairing or an app to sync multiple units together. Enlisting a physical switch so you know exactly where things stand is a much better and faster experience.
Some of the Elie 12’s controls (Billy Steele for Engadget)
In terms of sound, the best thing the Elie 6 and Elie 12 speakers have going for them is their overall clarity. The crisp, clear quality gives these Fender Audio units an advantage over the competition at these sizes. Throughout a range of genres — including bluegrass, alt-rock and heavy metal — both the Elie 6 and Elie 12 handled the varied styles with ease. The Elie 12 has twice the speakers as the Elie 6 (two full range, two tweeters and two subwoofers) and double the power output at 120 watts. So, of course, there’s more volume and bassy oomph on the larger speaker.
Both the Elie 6 and Elie 12 have a wider soundstage than many speakers of similar sizes. You can really hear this on American Football’s debut album, where the guitars ring clear, interlaced with drums while the vocals float on top. All of the elements stand on their own, but are seamlessly blended throughout every track. The Elie 12 features more bass and volume, but the overall sound quality, and importantly, clarity, is pretty similar for both speakers. I did notice more instrumental separation on the larger model though, so the album is a bit more immersive there.
The not so great: Controls, no app and battery life
While I appreciate the physical controls on the Elie 6 and Elie 12, the playback options are limited, which means you’ll be reaching for your phone often. There’s only a play/pause button on both speakers, and no controls for skipping tracks. And no, you can’t skip forwards or backwards with a double or triple press on the play/pause button. Plus, only the Elie 12 has bass and treble dials, so there’s currently no option for adjusting the sound on the Elie 6.
Advertisement
That’s because Fender Audio is still working on an app for its speakers and headphones. The lack of customization was an issue for me on the Mix headphones, and it continues to be one here. Customers need access to features and settings on devices like this, even if a company decides to offer audio presets instead of a full EQ. Some type of visual interface would also help when you’re using a few of those inputs at once. A basic mult-channel mixer maybe? Hey, a boy can dream.
Going back to the controls, the volume dials on both speakers could use refining. First, a listenable volume doesn’t happen until halfway. Anything below that and that excellent clarity isn’t present, and you can’t really hear the content well at all. There’s plenty of power at 50 percent and above, so that’s not a concern, but the control needs to be recalibrated for more even increases. What’s more, adjustments are slightly delayed: when you turn the dial, it takes a second or two for the speaker to catch up. To me, it feels like that should be instantaneous.
The input panel on the Elie 6 (Billy Steele for Engadget)
When it’s time to venture outdoors, both the Elie 6 and Elie 12 are IP54 rated for dust and water splashes. However, both speakers have a wood panel on top, which certainly won’t withstand much moisture. As such, I find the IP ratings confusing, since it’s obvious the entirety of the designs aren’t up to that task. If you’re careful about water though, both speakers have enough volume for open-air use.
One other consideration for the Elie 6 and 12 is their weight. The smaller speaker weighs just over five pounds, while the larger model is a whopping 8.8 pounds. For comparison, the Sonos Play is just 2.87 pounds and JBL’s Xtreme 4 tips the scales at 4.63 pounds. This means the Elie 6 and 12 are portable options, but they aren’t the grab-and-go type of speakers some of the competition offers — especially when weight matters.
Advertisement
Battery life is one other area the Elie 6 and Elie 12 fall behind some of their competition. The smaller Elie 6 offers 15 hours of use while the larger Elie 12 should last up to 18 hours. That sounds like more than enough since it’s longer than a full day, right? Well, JBL Bluetooth speakers at comparable prices last 24 and 34 hours. The new Sonos Play is rated at 24 hours, and one of my personal favorites, the Bose SoundLink Max, lasts up to 20 hours.
Wrap-up
The Elie 6 (left) and Elie 12 (right) (Billy Steele for Engadget)
There’s no doubt Fender Audio built two versatile, great-looking speakers here. Both the Elie 6 and Elie 12 are capable devices, and you don’t have to sacrifice much if you opt for the smaller of the two. The unique collection of inputs is typically only available on much larger speakers and the overall sound quality is well-suited for a range of genres.
Speakers like these really need an app though, especially when a company offers four inputs to juggle. I’m sure would-be customers would also like to dial in the EQ to their preferences, too. Sure, you can find longer battery life elsewhere, but the blend of design, sound and connectivity stands out at these prices. I’d call that a solid first impression.
A new report claims that Apple has had to agree to a three-year Samsung Display contract because no other firm can make the screens needed for the iPhone Fold.
Render of a possible iPhone Fold design – image credit: AppleInsider
Apple likes having multiple suppliers, both to avoid over-reliance on any one source, and to play them off against each other in order to lower prices. Now a year ago rumor about Samsung Display producing iPhone Fold screens is reportedly confirmed, and the deal favors the supplier. According to The Elec, Samsung Display proposed a three-year exclusive deal to supply the foldable OLED panels for the iPhone Fold. Reportedly, at present BOE’s foldable panels as used by Huawei are considered inadequate, and Apple’s other main supplier, LG Display, doesn’t yet make folding screens for smartphones. Continue Reading on AppleInsider | Discuss on our Forums
You must be logged in to post a comment Login