Connect with us

Crypto World

What About the Ethereum 2.0 Roadmap?

Published

on

What About the Ethereum 2.0 Roadmap?

The founder of the Ethereum project, Vitalik Buterin, unveiled a new roadmap for Ethereum a few weeks ago. His goal is to fix the weaknesses created by the migration from ETH1.0 (PoW) to ETH2.0 (PoS) regarding security and decentralisation. Vitalik, therefore, acknowledges that Ethereum has become centralised to the point where it can become dangerous, a risk that many people warned The Merge posed.

Ethereum roadmap:

The key to this change lies in whether these new modifications will be enough to make Ethereum a network with guarantees of decentralisation and resistance to censorship. We should wait a while to find out, as the new Ethereum roadmap is extensive and applies technologies that could be a success if well implemented. Without further ado, let’s take a look at the phases of this roadmap one by one:

First Phase: The Surge, truly scaling Ethereum

Advertisement

The Surge is the first phase of this new roadmap and aims to increase Ethereum’s scalability. Its construction relies on a series of improvements. Among them, the following stand out: 


1.- The activation of EIP-4844 (Proto-Danksharding): Proposed improvement consisting of enabling a new transaction format for Ethereum. Transactions can have “data BLOBs” that can be transparently integrated into the nodes and their operation. This is similar to how rollups work and could facilitate rollup operations on Ethereum. This way, Ethereum would increase its scalability, leaving behind the ‘PoS = more scalability’ farce sold during the pre-The Merge.


2.- A series of cryptographic improvements focused on offering a ZKP (Zero Knowledge Proof) model. These improvements would enable more private and secure transactions, as well as lay the foundations for the construction of zk-Rollups and zkEVM, which would allow for private smart contracts.


3.- Alongside ZKP would come SLE or Secret Leader Election (SLE). An improvement that seeks to make the election of the PoS validator node an event protected by ZKP cryptography. This is intended to prevent manipulation of the network to some extent.

Advertisement

Second phase: The Scourge, re-centralising the network


In this second phase, there is a need for SLE from the previous phase to be fulfilled. This is because The Scourge needs it to build its significant improvement Proposer / Builder Separation (PBS). PBS is a proposed solution to the problem of censorship and MEV (Maximum Extractable Value) attack on the Ethereum network. The idea lies in making the construction of blocks and the proposal of new blocks to be assigned to different parts of the network, avoiding the validator carrying the weight in both tasks.

The separation of roles also occurs in other blockchains such as Dash, where there is a similar scheme with Dash miners and Masternodes, each with very clear and well-defined roles in the network. Well, Ethereum wants to take this approach to make the network have two roles:


1. Generate the role of Block Proposer, dedicated to proposing blocks to the network, a job for which it could receive rewards. However, this still needs to be clarified in Ethereum, but in other networks, these nodes receive rewards (e.g. Flow).

Advertisement


2. Generate the role of Block Validator, which is in charge of validating the proposed block and receiving rewards for it.


Both roles would be under an SLE type selection, but only the Block Validator could write data to the blockchain. The problem with PBS is that the reward scheme needs to be adjusted, which will directly impact Ethereum tokenomics. 


Third Phase: The Verge, speeding up transaction verification


One issue that is a severe problem in Ethereum is transaction verification on the network. On-chain transaction verification is fast. However, the problem lies in the synchronisation and verification of transactions and their entire history.

Advertisement


This is where the third phase aims to make a significant change, making transactions able to include a series of ZKP enhancements using zk-SNARKs cryptography. Ultimately, Buterin wants Ethereum to implement zk-SNARKs as a cryptographic stack to generate the proofs needed to verify new transactions on the network. This has the advantage that zk-SNARKs are more secure than the current system using EdDSA (i.e. zk-SNARKs have higher resistance to quantum computers than EdDSA). Still, it has the disadvantage that

zk-SNARKs are algorithmically more complex. Catastrophic errors can be made, and bugs can be challenging to detect.


Fourth Phase: The Purge


This phase aims to make Ethereum simpler. As such, Buterin seeks to make the network have capabilities that allow for greater portability. These capabilities include:

Advertisement


1.- Enable a Fast sync. In other words, fast synchronisations only require downloading a part of the blockchain to have a functional node. Currently, the entire blockchain has to be downloaded.


2.- With the arrival of zk-SNARKs and verkle trees, unnecessary data could be discarded from the blockchain, which would allow nodes to need less disk space to store the blockchain, enabling small devices to serve as nodes (e.g. a smartphone). This would be another achievement, but it is complex, and the impact on validator nodes (which must have complete data to operate) is unknown.


3.- Further improvements in EVM to reduce gas usage and overhead (overhead on nodes and the network in general). 


Fifth phase: The Splurge

Advertisement


In this last phase of the roadmap, the aim is to repair everything that can be repaired in Ethereum. On the one hand, to say goodbye to the manipulation of gas costs with the EIP-1559. This would eliminate the current gas costing scheme and the token burning that currently prevails in Ethereum. On the other hand, activating the VDF (Verifiable Delay Function) is a type of cryptographic function that makes data verification more efficient. It is also intended to move everything from the EVM to the zkEVM.


Another goal is to change the account abstraction scheme in Ethereum, considering EIP-4337, which entails abstracting the wallets and associated accounts to a point away from the consensus because the accounts are no longer related to the consensus, but their operations are. 


Conclusion: Relative decentralisation


The design of Ethereum’s roadmap makes us think that its creator is concerned about the degree of decentralisation it shows to the world.

Advertisement

Indeed, some things would make Ethereum advanced and decentralised, such as the use of zk-SNARKs, PBS and SLE. However, its success depends on a reliable setup for the security it provides to be effective.

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Crypto World

10% Bounce Hope Rise As Whales Buy

Published

on

Ethereum Whales

Ethereum is trying to stabilize after weeks of heavy selling. The price is holding near the $1,950 zone, up around 6% from its recent low. At the same time, the biggest Ethereum whales have started accumulating aggressively.

But short-term sellers and derivatives traders remain cautious, creating a growing tug-of-war around the next move.

Biggest Ethereum Whales Accumulate as Bullish Divergence Stays Intact

On-chain data shows that the largest Ethereum holders are positioning for a rebound. Since February 9, addresses holding between 1 million and 10 million ETH have increased their holdings from around 5.17 million ETH to nearly 6.27 million ETH. That is an addition of more than 1.1 million ETH, worth roughly $2 billion at current prices.

Sponsored

Advertisement

Sponsored

Ethereum Whales
Ethereum Whales: Santiment

Want more token insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Crypto Newsletter here.

This accumulation aligns with a bullish technical signal on the 12-hour chart.

Between January 25 and February 12, Ethereum’s price made a lower low, while the Relative Strength Index, or RSI, formed a higher low. RSI measures momentum by comparing recent gains and losses. When price falls, but RSI rises, it often signals weakening selling pressure.

This bullish divergence suggests downside momentum is fading.

Advertisement
Bullish Divergence
Bullish Divergence: TradingView

The structure remains valid as long as Ethereum holds above $1,890, as the same signal flashed even on February 11 and still seems to be holding. A breakdown below this level would invalidate the divergence for now and weaken the rebound case.

For now, whales appear to be betting that this support will hold.

Sponsored

Sponsored

Short-Term Holders Are Selling?

While large investors are accumulating, short-term holders are behaving very differently.

Advertisement

The Spent Coins Age Band for the 7-day to 30-day cohort has surged sharply. Since February 9 (the same time when the whale pickup started), this metric has risen from around 14,000 to nearly 107,000, an increase of more than 660%. This indicator tracks how many recently acquired coins are being moved. Rising values usually signal possible profit-taking and distribution.

ETH Coins
ETH Coins: Santiment

In simple terms, short-term traders are exiting positions. This pattern appeared earlier in February as well. On February 5, a spike in short-term coin activity occurred near $2,140. Within one day, Ethereum dropped by around 13%.

That history shows how aggressive selling from this group can quickly reverse moves. As long as short-term holders remain active sellers, upside moves are likely to face resistance.

Sponsored

Sponsored

Advertisement

Derivatives Data Shows Heavy Bearish Positioning

Derivatives markets are reinforcing this cautious outlook. Current liquidation data shows nearly $3.06 billion in short positions stacked against only about $755 million in long leverage. This creates a heavily bearish imbalance with almost 80% of the market betting on the short side.

Shorts Dominate
Shorts Dominate: Coinglass

On one hand, this setup creates fuel for a potential short squeeze if prices rise. On the other hand, it shows that most traders still expect further weakness. This keeps momentum muted but keeps the bounce hope alive if the whale buying pushes the prices up, even a little bit, crossing past key clusters.

On-chain cost basis data helps explain why Ethereum struggles to break higher. Around $1,980, roughly 1.58% of the circulating supply, was acquired. Near $2,020, another 1.23% of supply sits at breakeven. These zones represent large groups of holders waiting to exit without losses.

Cost Basis Cluster
Cost Basis Cluster: Glassnode

Sponsored

Sponsored

When price approaches these levels, selling pressure increases as investors try to recover capital. This has repeatedly capped recent bounces. Only a strong leverage-driven move or short squeeze would likely be powerful enough to push through these supply clusters.

Advertisement

Until then, these zones remain major barriers.

Key Ethereum Price Levels To Track Now

With whales buying and sellers resisting, Ethereum price levels now matter more than narratives.

On the upside, the first major resistance sits near $2,010. A clean 12-hour close above this level would increase the probability of short liquidations. And it sits near the key supply cluster.

If that happens, Ethereum could target $2,140 next, a strong resistance zone with multiple touchpoints. It also sits around 10% from the current levels. On the downside, $1,890 remains the critical support. A break below this level would invalidate the bullish divergence and signal renewed downside pressure. Below that, the next major support sits near $1,740.

Advertisement
Ethereum Price Analysis
Ethereum Price Analysis: TradingView

As long as Ethereum holds above $1,890 and continues testing $2,010, the rebound structure remains intact. A sustained breakdown below support would cancel the current recovery attempt.

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

PGI CEO Gets 20 Years Over $200M Crypto Investment Scheme

Published

on

PGI CEO Gets 20 Years Over $200M Crypto Investment Scheme

A US federal judge in Virginia sentenced the chief executive of Praetorian Group International to 20 years in prison for running a $200 million cryptocurrency investment scheme that defrauded tens of thousands of investors.

According to the Department of Justice, 61-year-old Ramil Ventura Palafox, a dual US and Philippine citizen, was convicted of wire fraud and money laundering for what prosecutors described as a Ponzi scheme that falsely promised daily returns of up to 3% from Bitcoin trading. 

The US Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia said investors poured over $201 million into PGI between December 2019 and October 2021, including at least 8,198 Bitcoin (BTC) valued at about $171.5 million at the time. According to prosecutors, victims suffered losses of at least $62.7 million. 

The sentencing concludes the criminal case brought by the DOJ and follows a parallel civil action by the Securities and Exchange Commission, marking one of the larger crypto-related fraud cases in recent years by investor count and funds involved. 

Advertisement
PGI founder Ramil Ventura Palafox. Source: PGI Global Trade

Fake trading claims and luxury spending

Court filings said Palafox told investors PGI was engaged in large-scale Bitcoin trading capable of generating consistent daily profits. 

However, prosecutors said the company was not trading at a level sufficient to support the promised returns. Instead, new investor funds were used to pay earlier participants. 

Authorities said Palafox operated an online portal that falsely displayed steady gains, giving investors the impression their accounts were growing. He also used a multilevel marketing structure, offering referral incentives to recruit new members. 

The DOJ said Palafox spent millions in investor funds on personal expenses, including $3 million on luxury vehicles, over $6 million on homes in Las Vegas and Los Angeles, and hundreds of thousands of dollars on penthouse suites and high-end retail purchases.

Authorities said he also transferred at least $800,000 and 100 BTC to a family member. 

Advertisement

Related: Sam Bankman-Fried claims Biden DOJ silenced witnesses during FTX trial

Civil charges and international reach

The scheme began to unravel as regulators scrutinized PGI’s trading claims and fund flows.

In April 2025, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed a civil complaint alleging that Palafox misrepresented PGI’s Bitcoin trading activity and used new investor money to pay earlier participants.

The complaint said PGI promoted an AI-powered trading platform and guaranteed daily returns despite lacking trading operations capable of generating those profits.

Advertisement

Federal prosecutors in the Eastern District of Virginia later unsealed criminal charges accusing Palafox of wire fraud and money laundering arising from the same conduct. 

Authorities had seized the company’s website in 2021, and related operations were shut down in the United Kingdom, signaling cross-border enforcement scrutiny before the US criminal case advanced.

The DOJ said victims may be eligible for restitution and directed them to the US Attorney’s Office website for information on filing claims.