Connect with us

Crypto World

Why Peter Thiel’s Founders Fund Walked Away From an Ether Treasury Bet

Published

on

Why Peter Thiel’s Founders Fund Walked Away From an Ether Treasury Bet

Key takeaways

  • Founders Fund fully exited ETHZilla after previously holding a 7.5% stake. SEC filings show that Peter Thiel-linked entities had reduced their ownership to zero by the end of 2025, signaling a decisive retreat from an Ether-focused public treasury strategy.

  • ETHZilla’s pivot from biotech to an Ether treasury strategy was aggressive. After raising $425 million and later seeking $350 million through convertible bonds, the company accumulated over 100,000 ETH, positioning itself as a leveraged equity proxy for Ether exposure.

  • Debt-driven models can force crypto sales at unfavorable times. ETHZilla’s sale of 24,291 ETH in December 2025 to meet debt obligations highlighted a structural weakness. Leverage combined with crypto volatility can trigger asset liquidation during downturns.

  • Ether treasury strategies carry more operational complexity than Bitcoin treasuries. Ether-focused models often pursue staking and DeFi yields, introducing smart contract, liquidity and counterparty risks that Bitcoin “hold-only” treasury models typically avoid.

Peter Thiel, the renowned contrarian billionaire investor and co-founder of PayPal and Palantir, has a long history of bold, unconventional bets. A US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filing revealed that Thiel-linked Founders Fund entities exited ETHZilla after disclosing a 7.5% stake in 2025. ETHZilla is an Ether-focused digital asset treasury company.

The sale underscores broader market pressures on Ether treasury models, as ETHZilla’s stock has fallen sharply from its summer 2025 highs amid falling Ether (ETH) prices. This comes at a time when investor enthusiasm for leveraged or equity-wrapped crypto exposure appears to be waning.

This article examines why Thiel’s Founders Fund exited ETHZilla and analyzes the risks of leveraged Ether treasury models, debt-driven balance sheets and forced asset sales. It explores what the move signals about volatility, capital discipline and the sustainability of public crypto treasury strategies.

ETHZilla: From biotech to Ether treasury

In July 2025, biotech company 180 Life Sciences made a bold shift, raising $425 million to launch an Ether-focused treasury strategy and rebranding as ETHZilla. It positioned itself as a publicly traded vehicle for gaining exposure to Ether, with plans to build up its Ether holdings and deploy them in decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols and tokenized asset initiatives.

Advertisement

Just two months later, ETHZilla sought to secure an additional $350 million through convertible bonds to expand its reserves and support further projects. Reports indicated that the company held over 100,000 ETH on its balance sheet at one stage.

The idea behind the endeavor was straightforward: Secure funding, buy and hold Ether, generate potential returns through staking or DeFi activities and offer public shareholders leveraged exposure to Ether’s growth.

However, the strategy faced significant challenges as market conditions deteriorated.

Did you know? In September 2022, Ethereum transitioned from proof-of-work (PoW) to proof-of-stake (PoS) in an event known as “the Merge,” reducing its energy consumption by more than 99%. It is one of the most ambitious upgrades ever attempted on a live blockchain.

Advertisement

ETHZilla’s pivotal sale and Peter Thiel’s exit

As crypto markets retreated from their earlier highs, ETHZilla began reducing its Ether position.

In December 2025, ETHZilla sold 24,291 ETH, generating roughly $74.5 million at an average price of about $3,068 per coin. The stated purpose of the sale was to meet debt repayments. Following the transaction, its Ether holdings reportedly fell to around 69,800 ETH.

The sale of ETH marked a pivotal turning point for the company.

For a company built around an Ether treasury, being forced to offload ETH to cover debt highlighted a fundamental vulnerability. Combining leverage with crypto’s volatility can trigger the sale of holdings at any time. A strategy originally designed for patient, long-term accumulation can quickly transform into a scramble to stabilize the balance sheet.

Advertisement

Not long afterward, Thiel’s Founders Fund reduced its ownership in ETHZilla to zero, fully exiting its position by the end of 2025, according to SEC filings.

What a schedule 13G exit signals and what it doesn’t

A Schedule 13G filing signals passive investment. An amendment reporting zero shares simply means the filer no longer holds enough to meet the disclosure threshold.

These filings, however, do not reveal the reasons behind the change. They offer no insight into whether the sale stemmed from routine portfolio adjustments, risk reduction, valuation concerns or broader doubts about the Ether treasury approach itself.

Timing also matters in this case. Founders Fund’s complete exit came shortly after ETHZilla’s partial Ether liquidation amid mounting pressure on similar Ether-centric balance sheet strategies.

Did you know? Before becoming synonymous with contrarian macro bets, Peter Thiel invested $500,000 in Facebook in 2004 for a 10.2% stake, a deal that later became one of Silicon Valley’s largest venture returns.

Advertisement

Bitcoin vs. Ether treasuries: Store of value vs. layers of hidden complexity

While comparisons to Bitcoin (BTC) treasury strategies are inevitable, Ether introduces layers of complexity that Bitcoin treasuries typically avoid.

Heightened volatility amplified by leverage

Ether tends to experience greater price volatility driven by underlying sentiment compared to Bitcoin. This behavior stems from Ether’s role as both a digital asset and the fuel for a programmable blockchain platform. When treasury companies rely on convertible debt or other forms of leverage, drawdowns may trigger forced selling.

Yield pursuit introduces new risks

Bitcoin treasury companies typically follow a straightforward hold-and-appreciate model. Ether-focused companies, on the other hand, often emphasize staking rewards or DeFi yields to enhance returns. However, this approach comes with trade-offs:

What promises higher returns can also increase operational complexity and systemic vulnerabilities.

Advertisement

Greater narrative and perception challenges

Bitcoin treasury players benefit from a “digital gold” narrative rooted in scarcity and store of value appeal. Ether, however, represents a dynamic, evolving ecosystem shaped by network upgrades, gas fee dynamics, shifting regulatory views and competition from other blockchains. This added complexity heightens uncertainty and makes it harder for markets to price the strategy.

Ether accumulators following diverse paths

Not all companies that opted for Ether treasuries reacted similarly to the downturn in crypto markets.

Some of these companies continued to accumulate ETH, trusting that Ether’s long-term network expansion and utility would outweigh near-term price turbulence. Others took the opposite path, liquidating all or a significant portion of their holdings and realizing substantial losses.

This divergence in approaches suggests that the Ether treasury model is not inherently flawed or doomed across the board. Its sustainability depends on factors such as leverage levels, risk controls and resilience to market cycles.

Did you know? Unlike Bitcoin’s simple transaction fee model, Ether uses “gas” to measure computational work. During peak non-fungible token (NFT) booms, users at times paid hundreds of dollars in gas fees just to mint digital collectibles.

Advertisement

Capital structure risks in volatile asset classes

Convertible debt structures can amplify potential gains in bull markets by providing relatively low-cost leverage to acquire additional assets such as Bitcoin, effectively magnifying returns as prices rise.

When companies trade at premiums to their net asset value (NAV), they can issue equity or convertible instruments to raise capital, which boosts holdings and may further enhance upside.

However, in downturns, when equity discounts widen and crypto prices fall, the feedback loop can reverse:

In this kind of bearish environment, even long-term investors with large Ether portfolios may decide to trim or exit positions to limit downside risk.

Advertisement

Opportunity cost and cleaner exposure

Today’s institutional investors have far more direct avenues for gaining Ether exposure than in earlier market cycles. Options include secure direct custody solutions, regulated spot exchange-traded funds (ETFs), staking-enabled products and sophisticated derivatives. These structures can reduce exposure to company-specific operational, execution or governance risks.

By contrast, investing through an equity wrapper around a leveraged crypto treasury strategy adds an extra layer of complexity and uncertainty. This includes exposure to management’s discretionary decisions, funding and refinancing strategies, governance structures and capital allocation priorities, which may diverge from pure asset performance.

Founders Fund is a venture firm historically focused on backing high-growth operating companies with scalable, technology-driven business models. A vehicle centered on a leveraged crypto balance sheet may not align seamlessly with its long-term portfolio strategy or risk preferences. Recent developments, including its complete exit from Ether treasury plays such as ETHZilla amid market pressures, underscore this selective approach to crypto exposure.

Cointelegraph maintains full editorial independence. The selection, commissioning and publication of Features and Magazine content are not influenced by advertisers, partners or commercial relationships.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Crypto World

Banks Push Back on Kraken’s Fed Access as Trump Backs Crypto

Published

on

Banks Push Back on Kraken’s Fed Access as Trump Backs Crypto

The approval of Kraken’s access to the Federal Reserve’s core payments infrastructure has ignited a fierce response from the banking sector.

In a statement on Wednesday, the Independent Community Bankers of America (ICBA) and the Bank Policy Institute (BPI) strongly opposed the Fed’s decision, arguing it posed a risk to the financial system’s stability.

Banks Challenge Kraken’s Federal Approval

Hours after news surfaced that Kraken had become the first crypto company to secure a master account from the Federal Reserve, the ICBA issued a scathing statement in response.

“Granting nonbank entities and crypto institutions access to the master accounts traditionally limited to highly regulated insured depository institutions poses risks to the banking system,” said ICBA CEO Rebeca Romero, adding, “The Fed should continue limiting master account access to institutions that meet the financial services sector’s highest standards.”

On its part, the BPI expressed concern over the decision-making process. 

Advertisement

“This action ignores public comment that the Federal Reserve sought on this framework, and it was issued with no transparency into the process for approval or the risk mitigants that have been imposed to address the very significant risks it raises.”

The statements subtly highlighted that Kraken now has direct access to the same payment rails used by thousands of US banks and credit unions. This access allows it to settle US dollar transactions directly through the Fed, effectively bypassing intermediary banks. 

Kraken won’t receive all the benefits that traditional banks do with the Fed, such as earning interest on reserves. However, the approval represents a significant victory for the crypto industry.

This tension between banks and crypto extends beyond Kraken’s approval, highlighting ongoing concerns over crypto’s growing role in traditional finance.

The Ongoing Battle Over Stablecoin Interest

Before the passage of the GENIUS Act last July, banks lobbied heavily against the loose regulation of stablecoins. Their main argument centered on the danger that the bill could pose to traditional bank deposits

Advertisement

The concern was reasonable. Last April, a Treasury Department report estimated that stablecoins could lead to as much as $6.6 trillion in deposit outflows.

A month after the GENIUS Act passed, five banking associations —including the ICBA and BPI— sent a letter to Congress urging them to close a loophole that allows stablecoin issuers to pay interest through exchanges. 

They warned that such a gap could also lead to higher loan costs and less credit for businesses and families.

“Without an explicit prohibition applying to exchanges, which act as a distribution channel for stablecoin issuers or business affiliates, the requirements in the GENIUS Act can be easily evaded and undermined by allowing payment of interest indirectly to holders of stablecoins,” the letter read.

These tensions are now being carried over to discussions regarding the CLARITY Act. More specifically, the main concern is whether crypto exchanges can offer interest-like returns on stablecoins. 

Advertisement

Unfortunately for the banking sector, US President Donald Trump recently sided with the crypto industry.

Trump Slams Banks for Stalling CLARITY Act

On Tuesday night, the president accused US banks of undermining the GENIUS Act and stalling the CLARITY Act. 

“Americans should earn more money on their money. The Banks are hitting record profits, and we are not going to allow them to undermine our powerful Crypto Agenda that will end up going to China, and other Countries if we don’t get the Clarity Act taken care of,” Trump wrote on Truth Social.

The statement marked the sharpest presidential intervention yet in the legislative battle over stablecoin rewards. 

Trump, whose family has interests in numerous crypto ventures, is urging Congress to pass the market structure bill before the November midterm elections. These elections could dismantle the current Republican grip on the House and the Senate.

Trump’s social media post came hours after a POLITICO report confirmed that the president had a private meeting with Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong in the White House. 

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bitcoin Price Surges to Monthly Highs, Gains Over $10K Since USA-Iran Strikes Began

Published

on

Bitcoin Price Surges to Monthly Highs, Gains Over $10K Since USA-Iran Strikes Began


On-chain data reveals strong buying interest from whales just a day after the Chinese holidays ended.

Bitcoin’s price has finally shown strong signs of a solid breakout, skyrocketing to a new monthly peak of over $73,000 earlier today.

This is rather unexpected given the massive geopolitical tension, even referred to as war by some analysts, that broke out in the Middle East on Saturday.

Advertisement

At the time, BTC dumped to $63,000 after the US and Israel launched a military operation against Iran, which retaliated immediately against several nations in the region. Although Iran’s Supreme Leader was killed during the attacks, the country has doubled down on its strikes, while the US President indicated that the war could last up to four weeks.

Instead of charting new and painful losses, bitcoin reversed its trajectory by the end of Saturday and rocketed to $68,000. It was rejected and driven south to $66,000 in the following few days, but went hard on the offensive in the past 12 hours or so.

The cryptocurrency gained more than $5,000 within this timeframe, surging to its highest level in a month at over $73,000. This means that it’s up by more than $10,000 since its Saturday low when the attacks began.

Popular analyst CW suggested that the BTC CVD indicator “shows strong buying,” mostly from whales rather than retail.

Advertisement

You may also like:

In another post, the analyst noted that today is the first day after the Chinese holidays, which lasted for over a week this time, and some of the most utilized exchanges on local soil – Binance and OKX, “are showing massive net buying of BTC.”

Advertisement

Fellow market commentator Daan Crypto Trades acknowledged bitcoin’s surge to a month peak, indicating that the current rally has been a “solid breakout so far.” He believes the bulls should not allow BTC to dip below $71,500 again; otherwise, it would be regarded as a clear sign of weakness.

SPECIAL OFFER (Exclusive)

Binance Free $600 (CryptoPotato Exclusive): Use this link to register a new account and receive $600 exclusive welcome offer on Binance (full details).
Advertisement

LIMITED OFFER for CryptoPotato readers at Bybit: Use this link to register and open a $500 FREE position on any coin!

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

BTC funds see $1.7 billion in recent inflows

Published

on

BTC funds see $1.7 billion in recent inflows

After weeks of steady withdrawals, investors are beginning to allocate fresh capital to U.S. spot bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs).

The shift follows a difficult start to the year for the products. From mid-October, when bitcoin’s price began its downfall, through late February, spot bitcoin ETFs recorded cumulative outflows of about $9 billion, according to data from Bloomberg Intelligence ETF analyst James Seyffart. The category still shows $1.1 billion in net outflows for 2026, but flows have shifted in recent days. Since Feb. 24, investors have added roughly $1.7 billion.

The rebound suggests some investors believe bitcoin may have found at least a short-term floor.

“It was surprising to me that there was basically no dip buying when bitcoin was a falling knife to start the year,” Seyffart said. At the time, software stocks and crypto assets were both sliding, yet investor behavior split. Software ETFs pulled in record inflows as traders tried to time a bottom while bitcoin ETFs continued to see steady withdrawals.

Advertisement

Those withdrawals were not dramatic, but they persisted.

Now the pattern appears to be reversing. Seyffart said recent price action may have helped restore confidence. Over the weekend, bitcoin held above its recent lows despite geopolitical tensions tied to Iran.

“I think investors are likely feeling a bit more comfortable that we have hit at least a near-term bottom,” Seyffart said. “That higher low this weekend on such massive news had to be a comfort to some.”

The inflows also appear to reflect outright bullish positioning rather than market-neutral trading strategies. Some institutional investors use ETFs and futures together in what is known as a basis trade, where they capture yield from price differences between spot and futures markets.

Advertisement

But that setup does not appear attractive right now.

Yields tied to those trades remain relatively low, while open interest across CME’s crypto futures and options markets has declined. That drop suggests fewer traders are putting on large derivatives positions that typically accompany arbitrage strategies.

Instead, the ETF inflows look more like straightforward bets on bitcoin’s price direction.

Despite bitcoin falling about 16% this year, nearly all spot bitcoin ETFs still show net positive flows for 2026, with BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) adding roughly $300 million in capital year-to-date. That dynamic highlights how investors continue to allocate through regulated fund structures even during downturns.

Advertisement

Nate Geraci, president of the ETF Store, said the flows also reflect growing conviction among large asset managers promoting the funds.

“It’s easy to frame this as BlackRock simply promoting its highest-revenue product,” Geraci said. “But I see it more as the firm doubling down on its conviction that bitcoin belongs in diversified portfolios.”

Geraci noted that BlackRock has many higher-fee ETFs it could spotlight instead. Meanwhile its spot bitcoin ETF, IBIT, is down about 4% this year. Asset managers rarely highlight lagging funds unless they believe strongly in the long-term case, he said.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Pi Network’s PI Price Jumps 8.5% After Latest Updates: Details

Published

on

Pi Network (PI) Price on CoinGecko


PI’s price has rocketed to its highest levels in about two weeks.

Although the entire cryptocurrency market has been charting gains in the past 12 hours or so, some assets have performed better than others. Pi Network’s native token is among those, as the popular alt has taken advantage of the market-wide rally and now trades at a multi-week peak of almost $0.185.

Despite the upcoming massive token unlocks scheduled for the next week or so, PI’s gains today put it among the top-performing alts. Naturally, this surge could be driven by other factors, such as the most recent updates, which we reported earlier today.

Advertisement

More specifically, the Core Team indicated that the protocol v19.9 migration was successfully completed, which was a major milestone announced just a couple of weeks after the project was updated to v19.6.

This means that the next protocol version is v20.2, which the team hopes will be implemented before the 2026 Pi Day – March 14.

The team reminded once again that all node operators who must use desktop computers and laptops instead of mobile devices have to upgrade to the current protocol version. Otherwise, they could be disconnected from the network.

PI’s surge to a two-week high now means that the asset has gained over 14% in the past month. This is in stark contrast to most other larger-cap cryptocurrencies, including BTC, ETH, SOL, and XRP, all of which are down monthly. In some cases, such as BNB, XRP, and SOL, the monthly declines are by double digits.

Advertisement
Pi Network (PI) Price on CoinGecko
Pi Network (PI) Price on CoinGecko

What could be a worrying sign for the PI bulls is the rising number of tokens scheduled to be unlocked in the next couple of weeks. Data from PiScan shows that the average number of coins to be released daily will be around 6.8 million, but several days will see more than 11 million.

You may also like:

March 7 will be a record-setting day, with almost 21 million coins to be unlocked. This could intensify the immediate selling pressure on the asset if investors decide to dispose of their long-awaited tokens.

SPECIAL OFFER (Exclusive)

Binance Free $600 (CryptoPotato Exclusive): Use this link to register a new account and receive $600 exclusive welcome offer on Binance (full details).

LIMITED OFFER for CryptoPotato readers at Bybit: Use this link to register and open a $500 FREE position on any coin!

Disclaimer: Information found on CryptoPotato is those of writers quoted. It does not represent the opinions of CryptoPotato on whether to buy, sell, or hold any investments. You are advised to conduct your own research before making any investment decisions. Use provided information at your own risk. See Disclaimer for more information.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Trump met Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong before criticizing banks over crypto bill

Published

on

Trump met Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong before criticizing banks over crypto bill

U.S. President Donald Trump and Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong met behind closed doors shortly before the president said bankers are trying to undermine the GENIUS Act in a Truth Social post, CoinDesk confirmed.

“The U.S. needs to get Market Structure done, ASAP. Americans should earn more money on their money,” Trump said in the post on Tuesday. “The Banks are hitting record profits, and we are not going to allow them to undermine our powerful Crypto Agenda that will end up going to China, and other Countries if we don’t get The Clarity Act taken care of.”

Politico first reported the meeting between Armstrong and Trump. Afterward, the president publicly backed Coinbase’s “position in [the] ongoing lobbying clash with banks that has derailed a major cryptocurrency bill.”

The news outlet cited “two people with knowledge of the matter who were granted anonymity to discuss a closed-door matter” as the source of the meeting between Trump and Armstrong. It also said it was unclear what they both discussed during the meeting.

Advertisement

However, it reiterated, “it came just before Trump wrote on social media that banks ‘need to make a good deal with the Crypto Industry’ in order to advance digital asset legislation that has stalled on Capitol Hill.”

The White House and Coinbase have not responded to a CoinDesk request for comment.

The market structure bill has been stalled since the Senate Banking Committee lawmakers were set to debate and vote on it. The point holding back the passage of the crypto bill is that banks argue stablecoin interest rates could affect bank deposits and therefore, particularly, their lending ability. Crypto exchanges say individuals should be able to earn rewards on their stablecoins holdings, which they say the GENIUS Act allows.

JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon Tuesday said that stablecoin issuers that pay interest on customer balances should be regulated like banks. Patrick Witt, the executive director of the President’s Council of Advisors for Digital Assets, pushed back against Dimon, saying “the deceit here is that it is not the paying of yield on a balance per se that necessitates bank-like regulations, but rather the lending out or rehypothecation of the dollars that make up the underlying balance.” Witt also said the GENIUS Act “explicitly forbids stablecoin issuers from doing the latter. Stablecoins ≠ Deposits.”

Advertisement

Crypto-related stocks, including COIN, jumped Wednesday amid a broader surge in crypto prices. COIN climbed above $200, seeing its highest price since late January.

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Is Cardano Facing a Renewed Drop?

Published

on

ADA Exchange Netflow


While ADA rebounds, whale dumping keep it on shaky ground.

The cryptocurrency market witnessed a notable resurgence over the past 24 hours, with Cardano’s ADA following the green wave.

Nonetheless, the whales’ recent actions signal that a new correction might be knocking on the door.

Advertisement

The Bears Remain in Charge

ADA climbed above $0.27 today (March 4), gaining about 3% on a daily scale, though it remains down roughy 2% over the past week. Its decline during that period coincides with a sell-off by large investors.

The renowned analyst Ali Martinez revealed that whales have ‘redistributed’ 230 million tokens: a stash currently valued at around $63 million. This cohort of investors now controls less than 13.7 billion ADA, or roughly 37% of the asset’s circulating supply.

Since his graph shows a sizeable reduction in their holdings, it could be regarded as a significant sell-off that might weigh on the price for several reasons. They boost the amount of ADA available on the open market, and without a matching rise in demand, that extra supply can suppress the valuation. Whale distribution also signals weakening conviction among large holders, a shift that smaller investors may find worrying and cause them to cash out as well.

It is important to note that the behaviour of the big investors over the past week contrasts with their buying spree in recent months. As CryptoPotato reported, they purchased almost 820 million ADA between August 2025 and February this year.

Advertisement

Despite its daily resurgence, Cardano’s native token is still struggling to break out of its broader bearish pattern. Earlier this week, Martinez outlined $0.245, $0.112, and $0.051 as the next three lines of defense for the asset should it head south again.

You may also like:

Meanwhile, the popular trader Jake Gagain described ADA as one of his worst investments since entering the crypto market. His remarks sparked a heated debate, with some X users sharing his thesis, while others argued that his timing was bad and insisted that “the best is yet to come.”

The Bullish Signs

On the other hand, some technical indicators suggest Cardano’s native cryptocurrency could make a decisive comeback soon. For instance, ADA’s exchange netflows have been predominantly negative over the last few months. This means that investors continue to move coins from centralized platforms to self-custody, thereby reducing immediate selling pressure.

ADA Exchange NetflowADA Exchange Netflow
ADA Exchange Netflow, Source: CoinGlass

Next on the list is ADA’s Relative Strength Index (RSI), which has fallen below 30 on a weekly scale. The technical analysis tool ranges from 0 to 100, and readings above 70 signal that the asset is overbought and due for correction. Conversely, anything beneath 30 is considered a buying opportunity.

ADA RSIADA RSI
ADA RSI, Source: CryptoWaves

X user Sssebi noted the development, saying that “historically ADA has never been this oversold, which makes it one of the most undervalued projects.”

SPECIAL OFFER (Exclusive)

Binance Free $600 (CryptoPotato Exclusive): Use this link to register a new account and receive $600 exclusive welcome offer on Binance (full details).
Advertisement

LIMITED OFFER for CryptoPotato readers at Bybit: Use this link to register and open a $500 FREE position on any coin!

Disclaimer: Information found on CryptoPotato is those of writers quoted. It does not represent the opinions of CryptoPotato on whether to buy, sell, or hold any investments. You are advised to conduct your own research before making any investment decisions. Use provided information at your own risk. See Disclaimer for more information.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bitcoin (BTC) should be trading higher in crypto’s transition year, says Keyrock CEO

Published

on

Bitcoin (BTC) should be trading higher in crypto’s transition year, says Keyrock CEO

Bitcoin should be trading higher than it is today.

That’s the view of Kevin de Patoul, CEO and co-founder of crypto investment firm Keyrock, who argues that the market is misreading both macro conditions and structural progress in digital assets.

The world’s largest cryptocurrency was trading around $73,000 at the time of publication. Bitcoin is down about 18% year-to-date, having reached an all-time high of around $125,000 in early October last year.

“If you go back to early 2025 through 2026 and look at all the positive developments such as regulatory progress and institutional adoption, most people would have said that should make the price explode,” de Patoul said. “Increasing macro uncertainty should increase bitcoin demand, and yet it hasn’t.”

Advertisement

Instead, BTC has spent much of the past nine months under pressure, still behaving like a risk-on asset rather than the risk-off hedge many proponents claim it to be. Capital that flowed aggressively into bitcoin over the past 18 months, largely institutional, now appears more tactical than ideological.

“It’s still priced as a risk-on asset. Last in, first out in terms of capital allocation,” he said. “If investors perceive it that way, then in periods of stress they reduce exposure.”

Crypto assets have delivered a muted performance over the past six months, with bitcoin drifting well below its prior highs and much of the altcoin market struggling to sustain momentum. Trading volumes have thinned, volatility has compressed and broad-based rallies have failed to materialize, marking a sharp contrast to the speculative surges of previous cycles. Even as institutional adoption and tokenization efforts advance in the background, price action has remained subdued, reflecting cautious capital flows and a market searching for its next catalyst.

De Patoul stops short of saying the market is wrong. But he struggles to reconcile the pullback with the broader backdrop. “Nothing really explains the recent drop unless there’s a misunderstanding of the type of asset it’s supposed to be.”

Advertisement

That disconnect is emblematic of what he sees as crypto’s current moment: not a breakout cycle, but a structural transition.

“We’re not issuing stablecoins or taking retail deposits, but we’re connected to everything and provide liquidity across all venues,” de Patoul said. “That gives us a front-row seat to the evolution, and lets us participate in the market as it shifts toward digital assets and tokenized infrastructure.”

A tale of two markets

From Keyrock’s vantage point, working with banks, asset managers, issuers and exchanges, 2026 feels less like stagnation and more like rewiring.

“2026 feels like a transition year rather than a breakout one,” de Patoul said. “A lot of what defined crypto in previous cycles is dying out faster than expected, while the parts that actually make sense are still being built, like real finance moving onchain.”

Advertisement

In his view, two largely uncorrelated markets are developing in parallel.

The first is the crypto-native ecosystem: decentralized finance (DeFi), altcoins and the familiar cycle of liquidity and hype. Here, sentiment is subdued. The rising tide that once lifted all tokens has receded. Broad-based speculative rallies are harder to sustain, replaced by “very precise opportunities that make sense,” he said.

The second is the digitization of traditional finance. Tokenized money market funds, stablecoins, onchain funds and new market infrastructure. On that side, he says, he remains as enthusiastic as ever.

“When I speak to institutions, nothing has changed. The level of enthusiasm, the level of building, none of that drive has slowed,” de Patoul said. “The aim is to make crypto assets more accessible to clients and to rewire parts of financial markets.”

Advertisement

These institutional efforts are less sensitive to bitcoin’s price swings. Stablecoins, tokenized funds and settlement rails are about upgrading financial plumbing, not speculating on crypto’s next rally. Circle’s (CRCL) IPO and partnerships like Apollo’s tie-up with DeFi protocol Morpho reflect multi-year commitments, he noted.

But while the assets have been tokenized, the utility layer is still under construction.

Built, but not yet useful

The past 18 months marked a leap from concept to product. Funds were tokenized. Stablecoins proliferated. Infrastructure was deployed.

Yet liquidity remains thin in many tokenized money market funds and real-world assets (RWAs). The tokens exist, but often function as wrappers rather than transformative instruments.

Advertisement

“They’ve built the token. Now the question is: where can it be used? Who accepts it? Can it be used as collateral? Can it bring liquidity at scale?” de Patoul said.

Tokenizing a fund can, paradoxically, cut it off from traditional capital pools without immediately unlocking digital-native benefits. The bridge between traditional institutions and onchain markets, the ability to use tokenized assets seamlessly across both worlds, takes time.

“We’re stuck in an in-between phase,” he said. “The pieces are there. The next step is putting them together to bring liquidity at scale.”

That’s why he sees 2027 and 2028 as the real inflection point.

Advertisement

Traditional capital markets are orders of magnitude larger than crypto. Even a small percentage migrating onchain could eclipse crypto’s previous peak.

“In the course of 2027, we could get to a situation where RWAs grow to be as big as the whole of crypto was in the past,” de Patoul said. “It’s going to play out over the next two to three years.”

Digital finance, in other words, may outgrow crypto, though not necessarily in the form of a price-led boom.

“If the utility were fully there today, we’d probably have a booming market,” he said. “But it’s not. This is a transition phase.”

Advertisement

Keyrock’s bet

Founded eight years ago on the thesis that all assets would eventually be digital and onchain, Keyrock is positioning itself as a bridge between traditional and digital finance.

Historically rooted in capital markets and market-making, the firm continues to expand its crypto-native offerings, derivatives trading, liquidity provision and tailored strategies for investors. In September, it launched Keyrock Asset Management, adding a second pillar to the business. Assets under management remain modest given the recent launch, de Patoul said.

The broader ambition is to evolve from tokenization toward functionality: making digital assets genuinely useful at scale.

“A very big focus for us is how you move from tokenizing products to making those assets useful, and tokenizing at scale,” he said.

Advertisement

Regulatory clarity remains a gating factor. De Patoul points to the proposed Clarity Act as a “yellow flag,” not because he doubts its eventual passage, but because timing matters. “If it’s derailed for two years, it will have a meaningful impact,” he said. “Regulations getting passed is a massive deal for institutions. That’s when they can invest at scale.”

For now, crypto’s price action may feel uninspiring. But from de Patoul’s vantage point, the quiet build-out of digital market infrastructure is far more consequential than a short-term rally.

“The foundations are going in,” he said, “but the scale is yet to come.” This is why he sees “2027 and 2028 as the real inflection point for digital markets.”

Read more: JPMorgan bullish on crypto for rest of year as institutional flows set to drive recovery

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Crypto market hit by $521m in 24-hour liquidations

Published

on

Crypto market hit by $521m in 24-hour liquidations

A sharp volatility spike has triggered $521m in crypto liquidations over 24 hours.

Summary

  • About $521m in crypto futures positions were liquidated in the past 24 hours.
  • Bitcoin (BTC) led with more than $200m wiped out, followed by major altcoins.
  • Over 120,000 traders were liquidated as leverage reset across major derivatives venues.

A fresh volatility burst across digital assets has erased roughly $521m in crypto futures positions over the past 24 hours, according to derivatives data aggregators that track liquidations across major exchanges.

The wipeout was concentrated in overleveraged long positions, which had built up during the latest push higher in prices before the market abruptly turned. Bitcoin (BTC) accounted for more than $200m of the total, with Ethereum and other large-cap altcoins making up much of the remainder as cross-market selling cascaded through order books. In total, more than 120,000 individual trader accounts were liquidated, underscoring how quickly aggressive use of leverage can backfire when volatility picks up.

Advertisement

The pattern of the move fits a now-familiar script in crypto derivatives markets. In the days leading up to the liquidation spike, open interest in bitcoin and ether futures rose alongside gradually improving sentiment, while funding rates signaled traders were paying premiums to maintain long exposure. When prices reversed, margin buffers proved insufficient on many accounts, prompting automated risk engines to close positions into a falling market, which in turn deepened the sell-off and triggered further forced unwinds. Exchanges with large derivatives footprints reported the bulk of the notional hit, though no major venue reported systemic issues or outages, suggesting that risk systems functioned as designed even as traders absorbed heavy losses.

Leverage reset and market outlook

In the aftermath of the $521m flush, analysts are focused on how much speculative leverage has been cleared from the system and whether conditions are now in place for a more stable trend to emerge. On one hand, large, concentrated liquidation events can mark local turning points, especially if funding normalizes and open interest rebuilds more slowly on the back of spot demand rather than aggressive perpetuals.

On the other, repeated liquidation waves in recent weeks signal that positioning remains fragile, with traders quick to reapply leverage whenever prices recover. For BTC and other majors, the coming sessions will test whether ETF inflows, corporate treasury interest, and long-only buying can offset any renewed deleveraging pressures. Until leverage metrics settle into more conservative ranges, market participants may favor tighter risk limits, greater use of options hedges, and closer monitoring of liquidation heatmaps provided by analytics platforms such as CoinGlass.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

MEXC Adds Ondo Finance Listings to Tokenized Stock Offerings

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

Tokenized equities are gaining traction on crypto trading venues as MEXC deepens its collaboration with Ondo Finance, expanding on-chain access to mainstream U.S. stocks. In a March 3 update, the exchange said it would list 17 additional spot tokenized stock pairs and seven new tokens tied to defense and energy firms, all trading against USDT on its platform. The underlying equities remain held in regulated trust accounts and are subject to quarterly audits, designed to mirror ownership of the corresponding shares. The expansion marks the ninth wave of listings since the product’s initial rollout in September 2025, underscoring the accelerating push into tokenized traditional assets.

Key takeaways

  • The MEXCOndo Finance partnership adds 17 new tokenized stock pairs and seven defense/energy-linked tokens, broadening on-chain exposure to U.S. equities.
  • Tokens are issued as ERC-20 assets on Ethereum and trade against USDT (CRYPTO: USDT) pairs on the exchange, with the underlying shares held in regulated trusts and audited quarterly.
  • Trading fees for the 17 new pairs are waived for the first 30 days, a post-launch incentive designed to spur onboarding and liquidity.
  • Among the newly listed tokens are representations tied to Lockheed Martin (EXCHANGE: LMT), RTX (EXCHANGE: RTX), ConocoPhillips (EXCHANGE: COP) and Occidental Petroleum (EXCHANGE: OXY); withdrawals for the new tokens are set to commence on March 5.
  • This expansion continues a multi-month cadence of tokenized-equity launches, illustrating sustained interest from exchanges in on‑chain access to traditional assets.

Tickers mentioned: $LMT, $RTX, $COP, $OXY, $USDT

Sentiment: Neutral

Price impact: Neutral. The piece centers on new listings and fee waivers rather than explicit price movements or market reactions.

Market context: Tokenized equities are increasingly appearing across crypto venues as platforms seek to bridge traditional asset access with on-chain infrastructure, even as regulatory guidance remains nuanced in the United States. The trend is underscored by multiple exchanges expanding their tokenized stock catalogs and by ongoing industry chatter about how on-chain representations can coexist with conventional securities frameworks.

Advertisement

Why it matters

The MEXC–Ondo Finance collaboration is emblematic of a broader push to tokenize traditional assets and to deliver them in a blockchain-native format. By representing ownership of real shares as ERC-20 tokens, the partners aim to offer investors near-instant settlement, programmable governance features, and 24/7 trading availability across global markets. The underlying shares are held in regulated trust accounts and are subject to quarterly third-party audits, offering a degree of regulatory comfort that is often cited as a barrier in earlier tokenized-stock experiments.

Significantly, the expansion includes defense and energy sector equities. The addition of tokens tied to Lockheed Martin, RTX, ConocoPhillips and Occidental Petroleum alongside broader tech, healthcare and financials exposure broadens the potential use cases for tokenized assets—from hedging and diversification to access for non-traditional audiences who prefer crypto-friendly platforms. For participants, the ability to trade tokenized stock pairings against USDT on an exchange known for its liquidity could reduce the friction and settlement times historically associated with traditional stock trading venues.

Ondo Finance’s role as the on-chain issuer remains central. Based in New York, Ondo focuses on bringing traditional financial assets on-chain, and its current asset base totals around $2.66 billion in tokenized value. This scale underscores the practical viability of maintaining regulated custody and audits while delivering on-chain representations. The partnership’s track record—nine expansions since the product’s September 2025 launch—signals a deliberate strategy to normalize tokenized equities as a complement to, rather than a replacement for, conventional stock markets. In the broader market, such expansions occur amid rising interest in tokenized assets, even as market participants monitor regulatory developments and the potential implications for liquidity, custody, and investor protections.

Additionally, the initiative sits within a backdrop of exchanges experimenting with tokenized-stock pipelines beyond the United States. Other platforms have rolled out tokenized stock trading or perpetual futures tied to US-listed equities, illustrating a growing ecosystem of on-chain representations that appeal to crypto-native traders seeking cross-asset exposure. The combination of regulated custody, periodic audits and 30-day fee waivers creates a practical path for onboarding new users who may be evaluating the stability and reliability of tokenized equities as part of diversified crypto portfolios.

Advertisement

What to watch next

  • Withdrawals for the seven new tokenized equities, including LMT, RTX, COP and OXY, begin on March 5, opening the door for user-access and potential liquidity ramps.
  • The ongoing cadence of tokenized-equity expansions—now at nine total—could foretell further category diversification, including additional sectors or international listings.
  • Regulatory developments in the U.S. and elsewhere could influence product design, custody standards, and eligibility for retail participation in tokenized securities.
  • Any updates on trading volumes, liquidity metrics, or auditing cadence could shape investor confidence and platform competitiveness relative to other tokenized-equity offerings.

Sources & verification

  • PR Newswire: MEXC and Ondo Finance expand tokenized stock partnership with 17 new spot pairs and zero-fee trading (March 3)
  • Newswire Canada: MEXC partners with Ondo Finance to launch tokenized U.S. equities in defense and energy sectors (seven new equities)
  • RWA.xyz: Ondo platform data showing tokenized asset totals
  • CoinMarketCap: Exchange data corroborating MEXC’s ranking and activity
  • Cointelegraph coverage on related tokenized-equity developments (Kraken) for context on industry movements

Expanded tokenized equities deepen MEXC-Ondo collaboration

On March 3, MEXC, a centralized crypto exchange founded in 2018, announced a widened on-chain representation of U.S. equities through its partnership with Ondo Finance. The update confirms 17 additional tokenized stock pairs and seven new tokens connected to the defense and energy sectors. Trading occurs as ERC-20 tokens on Ethereum and exchanges against USDT (CRYPTO: USDT) pairs on the platform, with the underlying shares held in regulated trust accounts and subjected to quarterly audits to help ensure parity with the actual securities. The issuance framework emphasizes custody and compliance, distinguishing it from more speculative on-chain assets by anchoring tokens to registered equities.

The new batch expands a product line that Ondo and MEXC have iterated since September 2025, reflecting a deliberate effort to scale tokenized equities across multiple sectors. The seven defense- and energy-linked tokens—led by shares tied to major names such as Lockheed Martin, RTX, ConocoPhillips and Occidental Petroleum—underscore a broadening approach to sectoral diversification. Investors will see these tokens trade on the same venue as other tokenized assets, with withdrawals scheduled to start on March 5, a procedural milestone that enables on-exchange redemption and on-platform liquidity adjustments. The first appearances of these equities are designed to resemble the same ownership logic that governs traditional shares, backed by regulated custody, audit regimes and outside oversight.

From a structural standpoint, Ondo Finance positions itself as a New York–based firm focused on bringing traditional assets on-chain. Its portfolio footprint—about $2.66 billion in tokenized value—serves as a crucial reference point for the perceived reliability of tokenized equities in live markets. By modularizing the tokenization process (ERC-20 representations) and integrating with established exchanges that already handle high trading volumes, the collaboration aims to deliver familiar equity exposure through the lens of decentralized finance rails. While the technology stack enables on-chain settlement and programmable features, the governance and compliance layers remain anchored in traditional regulatory or custodial frameworks, an arrangement designed to reassure participants wary of unregulated digitized securities.

For observers, the expansion highlights a broader trend: crypto venues are increasingly courting mainstream assets via tokenization, even as the regulatory climate remains a work in progress. The combination of regulated trust custody, periodic audits, and time-bound promotional incentives (such as 30-day trading-fee waivers) signals a practical approach to onboarding a broader audience—investors who want the flexibility and 24/7 access of crypto platforms while still acknowledging the underlying equity rights. In this evolving landscape, the MEXC–Ondo collaboration stands as a notable example of how traditional finance and blockchain-enabled markets are converging, with the potential to redefine liquidity access and cross-asset trading strategies for retail and institutional participants alike.

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Four months on, MEV Capital falls victim to $4B DeFi daisy chain implosion

Published

on

Four months on, MEV Capital falls victim to $4B DeFi daisy chain implosion

Almost four months have passed since the devastating disassembly of a DeFi daisy chain, which saw the value of the so-called “yield vault” sector drop by over $4 billion.

Since then, many of the “risk curators” involved have kept a low profile, while others are keen to rebuild confidence.

Last week, it became clear that one such curator hadn’t managed to weather the storm.

MEV Capital dissolves

Last week, The Big Whale reported that MEV Capital would be taken over by one of its partners, Belem Capital. Citing DeFiLlama figures, the article highlights an 80% drop in MEV Capital’s assets under management, dropping from $1.5 billion to $300 million.

Advertisement

The drop-off was sparked by the firm’s exposure to looped-leverage yield strategies involving deUSD, which depegged in early November in response to the collapse of Stream Finance (not, as the article claims, in the infamous October 10 market crash).

Elixir announced it would discontinue deUSD shortly thereafter.

MEV Capital’s CEO Laurent Bourquin, “seems to have abruptly stepped back,” according to the article.

Additionally, asset tokenization platform Midas Capital disclosed that it had “concluded all business” with MEV Capital, handing management of mMEV and mevBTC to RockawayX. 

Advertisement

DeFi’s ‘risk curator reckoning’

In late October, worries began to circulate over the integrity of a number of high-yield vault tokens across the DeFi sector.

Days later, one of these risk curators, Stream Finance, collapsed spectacularly after admitting it had lost $93 million. With the quality of its backing exposed, Stream’s vault token, xUSD, lost 75% of its value.

Other assets in the “daisy chain” of recursive lending followed suit, notably Elexir’s deUSD.

The resulting domino effect saw a scramble to unwind leverage across a handful of projects. In all, almost half of the sector’s $10 billion in total value locked was wiped out over the following month.

Advertisement

It’s since recovered slightly, sitting at around $6 billion.

Some handled it better than others, with users often waiting weeks with no news. Risk curator Re7 Labs even made legal threats to a self-styled “whistleblower” who had publicly complained on behalf of depositors.

‘Any curators reading these reports?’

November’s yield vault apocalypse hinged on recursive lending and borrowing of vault tokens between interconnected projects.

More sustainable projects, however, went unscathed. They’ve increasingly leaned into “institutional-grade” offerings of on-chain, but somewhat more tangible, real world assets (RWA).

Advertisement

The aforementioned Midas Capital tokenizes off-chain funds such as Fasanara’s F-ONE (as mF-ONE), for example. These come with regular reporting on the state of off-chain assets.

However, some remain unconvinced, asking “any curators reading these reports?” in response to Midas’ recent disclosure of an inaccuracy in their mF-ONE reporting. Another X user called the reporting “trash,” pointing to delays and missing information.

It should be noted that both accounts are contributors at Yearn, a fully on-chain yield aggregator platform.

Read more: Yearn hacker loses $2.4M of $9M loot as tokens burned from wallet

Advertisement

Off-chain risk, now on-chain

DeFi is often seen as plenty risky enough, but it’s certainly not immune from outside risks.

A detailed December report from curator Steakhouse Financial drew attention to a 2% drop in Midas-tokenized fund mF-ONE, in line with the real-world version.

The dip wasn’t enough to cause any mF-ONE collateralized positions to be liquidated, but still raised eyebrows as a novel asset class in DeFi.

Last week, risk management firm Chaos Labs revisited the episode, pointing to “a bankrupt auto-parts supplier” as the source of the shortfall.

Advertisement

It makes the case that “yield is risk,” and that “off-chain doesn’t mean safe by default.”

Steakhouse, whose high-yield vault is exposed to mF-ONE, said the post contained “inaccuracies and selective presentations” and accused Chaos Labs of “plagiarismgooning and fudmaxxing.” 

Founder of Steakhouse, Sébastien Derivaux, insisted that mF-ONE is “fit for high yield vaults as collateral.”

Worth it?

The mechanics of bringing RWAs into DeFi are complex. They also make adhering to the maxim “don’t trust, verify,” reliant on issuers’ reporting on off-chain assets.

Advertisement

Even stranger, their use as collateral may even see lenders receiving lower yield than the collateral itself. Whilst assuming both counterparty and underlying asset risk.

Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news and investigations, follow us on XBluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025