Connect with us

Crypto World

Banks Push Back on Kraken’s Fed Access as Trump Backs Crypto

Published

on

Banks Push Back on Kraken’s Fed Access as Trump Backs Crypto

The approval of Kraken’s access to the Federal Reserve’s core payments infrastructure has ignited a fierce response from the banking sector.

In a statement on Wednesday, the Independent Community Bankers of America (ICBA) and the Bank Policy Institute (BPI) strongly opposed the Fed’s decision, arguing it posed a risk to the financial system’s stability.

Banks Challenge Kraken’s Federal Approval

Hours after news surfaced that Kraken had become the first crypto company to secure a master account from the Federal Reserve, the ICBA issued a scathing statement in response.

“Granting nonbank entities and crypto institutions access to the master accounts traditionally limited to highly regulated insured depository institutions poses risks to the banking system,” said ICBA CEO Rebeca Romero, adding, “The Fed should continue limiting master account access to institutions that meet the financial services sector’s highest standards.”

On its part, the BPI expressed concern over the decision-making process. 

Advertisement

“This action ignores public comment that the Federal Reserve sought on this framework, and it was issued with no transparency into the process for approval or the risk mitigants that have been imposed to address the very significant risks it raises.”

The statements subtly highlighted that Kraken now has direct access to the same payment rails used by thousands of US banks and credit unions. This access allows it to settle US dollar transactions directly through the Fed, effectively bypassing intermediary banks. 

Kraken won’t receive all the benefits that traditional banks do with the Fed, such as earning interest on reserves. However, the approval represents a significant victory for the crypto industry.

This tension between banks and crypto extends beyond Kraken’s approval, highlighting ongoing concerns over crypto’s growing role in traditional finance.

The Ongoing Battle Over Stablecoin Interest

Before the passage of the GENIUS Act last July, banks lobbied heavily against the loose regulation of stablecoins. Their main argument centered on the danger that the bill could pose to traditional bank deposits

Advertisement

The concern was reasonable. Last April, a Treasury Department report estimated that stablecoins could lead to as much as $6.6 trillion in deposit outflows.

A month after the GENIUS Act passed, five banking associations —including the ICBA and BPI— sent a letter to Congress urging them to close a loophole that allows stablecoin issuers to pay interest through exchanges. 

They warned that such a gap could also lead to higher loan costs and less credit for businesses and families.

“Without an explicit prohibition applying to exchanges, which act as a distribution channel for stablecoin issuers or business affiliates, the requirements in the GENIUS Act can be easily evaded and undermined by allowing payment of interest indirectly to holders of stablecoins,” the letter read.

These tensions are now being carried over to discussions regarding the CLARITY Act. More specifically, the main concern is whether crypto exchanges can offer interest-like returns on stablecoins. 

Advertisement

Unfortunately for the banking sector, US President Donald Trump recently sided with the crypto industry.

Trump Slams Banks for Stalling CLARITY Act

On Tuesday night, the president accused US banks of undermining the GENIUS Act and stalling the CLARITY Act. 

“Americans should earn more money on their money. The Banks are hitting record profits, and we are not going to allow them to undermine our powerful Crypto Agenda that will end up going to China, and other Countries if we don’t get the Clarity Act taken care of,” Trump wrote on Truth Social.

The statement marked the sharpest presidential intervention yet in the legislative battle over stablecoin rewards. 

Trump, whose family has interests in numerous crypto ventures, is urging Congress to pass the market structure bill before the November midterm elections. These elections could dismantle the current Republican grip on the House and the Senate.

Trump’s social media post came hours after a POLITICO report confirmed that the president had a private meeting with Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong in the White House. 

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Crypto World

Bitcoin Price Holds Above $71K Amid Rising Tensions

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

Bitcoin Price Holds Above $71K Amid Rising Tensions

Rising geopolitical tensions and steady ETF inflows are shaping crypto markets this week. Bitcoin trades above $71,000 while analysts assess risks tied to US-Iran hostilities. Meanwhile, capital flows into spot exchange-traded funds signal sustained institutional demand.

Bitcoin trades at $71,223 during early Wednesday sessions. The price has gained 7% over the past 24 hours. However, it still struggles to secure a firm break above $70,000 resistance.

The cryptocurrency remains within a narrow range between $65,000 support and $70,000 resistance. Buyers are pushing price action toward the upper boundary of consolidation. Momentum indicators show strength as MACD lines stay above the signal line.

The Relative Strength Index stands near 66, which reflects bullish pressure without overbought conditions. A confirmed breakout above $70,000 could drive price toward $72,000. Conversely, a rejection may pull Bitcoin back toward $67,000 or even $65,000.

Advertisement

Market sentiment also reflects broader geopolitical developments. Tensions between the United States and Iran intensified after military operations in early 2026. Energy markets reacted sharply as oil and gas prices recorded rapid swings.

A Beijing-based historian, Jiang Xueqin, had earlier predicted escalating conflict under a second Donald Trump administration. He argued that Washington could face a prolonged and costly confrontation with Tehran. His projection gained renewed attention after clashes including the 12-Day War of 2025.

The United States and Israel launched Operation Epic Fury in February 2026. Iran responded with missile attacks and expanded regional proxy engagement. As a result, global trade routes and shipping lanes faced renewed security threats.

Ethereum Price Steady Above $1,900 Despite ETF Outflows

Ethereum trades slightly above $1,900 in recent sessions. The asset shows modest gains while broader market capitalization increases. However, spot Ethereum ETFs recorded a net outflow of $10.75 million on March 3.

Advertisement

Despite the net outflow, BlackRock’s ETHA product posted a daily inflow of $41.92 million. This performance indicates selective demand within Ethereum-linked funds. Therefore, capital rotation remains visible across crypto investment products.

Ethereum has faced pressure during Bitcoin’s consolidation phase. Still, it maintains relative stability compared to previous corrections. The broader crypto market cap rose 0.53% to reach $2.34 trillion.

Regulatory developments have also supported digital asset valuations. Lawmakers in Washington continue discussions on clearer frameworks for crypto oversight. Consequently, market participants are weighing both policy direction and geopolitical risk.

US-Iran tensions add complexity to global financial conditions. Energy price volatility often influences inflation expectations and monetary policy outlooks. Such macro factors continue to shape demand for alternative assets including cryptocurrencies.

Advertisement

XRP Gains Modest ETF Inflows as Market Consolidates

XRP-related spot ETFs recorded $7.53 million in daily net inflows. Although smaller than Bitcoin flows, the figure signals steady product interest. XRP price action remains aligned with broader market consolidation.

Bitcoin spot ETFs registered a combined $225 million net inflow on March 3. BlackRock’s IBIT led the market with $322 million in inflows. These figures underscore continued capital allocation into Bitcoin-focused products.

ETF demand has become a significant driver of crypto liquidity. Since regulatory approval, spot products have attracted both institutional and retail capital. This structural shift continues to influence price stability during volatility.

Meanwhile, debate persists over US military strategy and global positioning. Jiang argues that reliance on airpower and precision strikes may not secure long-term dominance. Critics counter that American military capacity remains unmatched despite extended commitments.

Advertisement

Ethereum Price Steady Above $1,900 Despite ETF Outflows

Ethereum trades slightly above $1,900 in recent sessions. The asset shows modest gains while broader market capitalization increases. However, spot Ethereum ETFs recorded a net outflow of $10.75 million on March 3.

Despite the net outflow, BlackRock’s ETHA product posted a daily inflow of $41.92 million. This performance indicates selective demand within Ethereum-linked funds. Therefore, capital rotation remains visible across crypto investment products.

Ethereum has faced pressure during Bitcoin’s consolidation phase. Still, it maintains relative stability compared to previous corrections. The broader crypto market cap rose 0.53% to reach $2.34 trillion.

Regulatory developments have also supported digital asset valuations. Lawmakers in Washington continue discussions on clearer frameworks for crypto oversight. Consequently, market participants are weighing both policy direction and geopolitical risk.

Advertisement

US-Iran tensions add complexity to global financial conditions. Energy price volatility often influences inflation expectations and monetary policy outlooks. Such macro factors continue to shape demand for alternative assets including cryptocurrencies.

XRP Gains Modest ETF Inflows as Market Consolidates

XRP-related spot ETFs recorded $7.53 million in daily net inflows. Although smaller than Bitcoin flows, the figure signals steady product interest. XRP price action remains aligned with broader market consolidation.

Bitcoin spot ETFs registered a combined $225 million net inflow on March 3. BlackRock’s IBIT led the market with $322 million in inflows. These figures underscore continued capital allocation into Bitcoin-focused products.

ETF demand has become a significant driver of crypto liquidity. Since regulatory approval, spot products have attracted both institutional and retail capital. This structural shift continues to influence price stability during volatility.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, debate persists over US military strategy and global positioning. Jiang argues that reliance on airpower and precision strikes may not secure long-term dominance. Critics counter that American military capacity remains unmatched despite extended commitments.

The renewed conflict narrative intersects with financial markets through energy and trade channels. Oil price spikes increase transport and production costs worldwide. As a result, risk assets including cryptocurrencies reflect broader macro uncertainty.

Overall, Bitcoin holds key levels while ETF inflows provide support. Ethereum and XRP show mixed but stable capital flows. Geopolitical tensions, however, remain a defining variable for near-term crypto direction.

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bitcoin Bulls Strike Back But $78K May Remain Resistance

Published

on

Bitcoin Bulls Strike Back But $78K May Remain Resistance

Key takeaways:

  • Derivatives and onchain data show a lack of bullish conviction, as 43% of Bitcoin holders remain at a loss despite recent price gains.

  • Surging AI energy demand is squeezing miner profits to record lows, forcing major listed firms to offload BTC and pivot to computing.

  • Traders face a psychological hurdle at $76,000, the average cost basis for major corporate holders like Strategy.

Bitcoin (BTC) surged to a four-week high on Wednesday, potentially clearing a path for a recovery toward the $78,700 monthly close recorded in January. Despite a 22% rally from the $60,000 local bottom on Feb. 6, several onchain and derivatives metrics suggest bears remain comfortable. 

Demand for downside protection through Bitcoin options continues to dominate the market.

BTC 30-day options skew (put-call) at Deribit. Source: Laevitas.ch

Put (sell) options recently traded at a 10% premium relative to equivalent call (buy) instruments. In neutral market conditions, this indicator typically ranges between -6% and 6%, a level last observed in mid-January when Bitcoin traded near $95,000. 

Professional traders appear to fear further downside, while demand for bullish BTC futures remains stagnant; the annualized premium, or basis rate, currently sits below the neutral 5% threshold.

Advertisement

The weakness in Bitcoin derivatives reflects the month-long consolidation following the 32% crash during the first week of February. However, the lack of conviction from bulls even as prices move above $73,000 suggests a deeper hesitation. This cautious mood likely comes from the fact that a significant portion of holders are still stuck in the red.

Percentage of circulating supply in profit, estimate. Source: Glassnode

Currently, 43% of the supply is held at a loss based on the price coins last moved, according to Glassnode data. This share of holders sustaining losses spiked from 30% when Bitcoin traded at $90,000 in late January. Traders fear that investors sitting on these losses will gradually exit their positions as the price recovers, creating persistent overhead sell pressure that could cap further gains.

Another source of concern stems from the Bitcoin mining sector, which has faced significant pressure due to the exponential growth in artificial intelligence demand. Rising energy costs and declining demand for the Bitcoin blockchain registry have pushed miner profitability toward all-time lows. Several major listed mining firms have pivoted toward AI computing, offloading their Bitcoin holdings in the process.

Expected value of 1 TH/second of hashing power per day. Source: HashRateIndex

The Bitcoin Hashprice index, which measures the expected daily value of one terahash per second of hashing power, plummeted to $30 on Tuesday, down from $39 three months ago. Investors fear that miners may transition into net sellers after a prolonged period of accumulation. 

Mining companies that previously maintained a Bitcoin strategic reserve are now reportedly eyeing more profitable opportunities in alternative high-performance computing sectors.

Related: MARA exec pushes back on Bitcoin treasury sell-off narrative

Advertisement

Strategy’s $76,000 cost basis could be the turning point for Bitcoin momentum

Strategy (MSTR US) remains the primary example of a Bitcoin-centered balance sheet strategy. After purchasing 720,737 BTC since its initial deployment in August 2020, the company faced scrutiny as Bitcoin dropped below its average acquisition price of approximately $76,000. 

Other publicly traded entities, including Metaplanet (3350 JP) and Twenty One Capital (XXI US), have encountered similar valuation challenges during the current bear market conditions.

Bitcoin strategic reserve acquisitions by MSTR. Source: Strategy

While Strategy does not face imminent liquidation risks or a lack of cash for interest payments on yield-bearing assets like STRC, bears recognize that prices above the Bitcoin cost basis incentivize stock issuance without diluting current holders. 

Essentially, market participants looking to suppress the price have strong incentives to keep Bitcoin pegged below $76,000. Therefore, a recovery toward $78,700 may take longer than expected, though momentum could shift in favor of bulls once that key level is breached.