Confining mealtimes and snacks to a nine-hour window and avoiding food for four hours before bed may help stave off cognitive decline in older age, according to preliminary findings from a small clinical trial presented at a major nutrition science conference.

The pilot study, conducted by researchers at Rutgers University in New Jersey, found that older women living with overweight or obesity who ate within a restricted daily window showed hints of improved mental performance compared with those who spread their meals over a longer stretch of the day.

A Small But Notable Trial

The finding is preliminary given the numbers in the trial, but if confirmed in larger studies, the work suggests people could help protect their cognitive abilities by eating within a relatively narrow window and avoiding food late into the night.

Professor Sue Shapses, a nutritional scientist at Rutgers University who led the research, explained that weight loss itself already has known cognitive benefits, but that timing appeared to offer something additional. Losing weight alone can help slow cognitive decline in older age, Shapses said, but there may be “additional benefits” for people who do not eat outside an eight- to nine-hour window and stop eating four hours before going to sleep.

Why Cognitive Decline Prevention Matters

The stakes behind this kind of research are significant given the scale of dementia’s global impact. Dementia is the leading cause of death in the U.K. and the seventh worldwide, contributing to nearly 2 million deaths globally each year. While some risk factors, such as age and genetics, cannot be changed, experts believe nearly half of dementia cases could be prevented or delayed through lifestyle changes, and obesity in middle age has been shown to raise the risk of dementia in later life by roughly 30%.

How the Study Was Designed

Shapses ran a small clinical trial involving 47 women between the ages of 50 and 79 who were living with overweight or obesity, all of whom were encouraged to cut 500 calories from their daily diet over a six-month period. Within that group, 26 participants were advised to eat only within a nine-hour window, typically between 10 a.m. and 6 p.m., while the remaining volunteers spread their meals across roughly 12 hours of the day.

Similar Weight Loss, Different Cognitive Outcomes

By the end of the six-month trial, both groups of women had lost a comparable amount of weight, but their cognitive test results diverged in meaningful ways. At the end of the trial, both groups had similar weight loss, averaging about 7 kilograms, or roughly 15 pounds. But cognitive tests revealed that those who confined their eating to the narrow window performed better than the others on spatial planning and problem-solving tests.

The group following the restricted eating window also showed some additional advantages on other types of cognitive assessments, though not universally across every test administered. There were also hints that participants following the restricted schedule made fewer errors on memory and learning tests, though on some multitasking and reaction-time tests, both groups performed similarly.

Researchers Describe the Effect as “Modest”

Shapses was careful to frame the magnitude of the findings appropriately, avoiding overstating what the small trial could definitively prove. Shapses called the effects “modest” but said they suggested time-restricted eating may improve people’s ability to remember information for everyday tasks and reduce mistakes linked to memory, attention and problem-solving. The findings were presented at Nutrition 2026, the annual meeting of the American Society for Nutrition, held in Maryland.

What Might Explain the Effect

Researchers say they now want to dig deeper into the biological mechanisms that could explain why meal timing, not just food content, appears to matter for brain health. The researchers plan to investigate why it may be important to consider when people eat as well as what they eat, with the observed benefits potentially driven by a complex interplay of circadian rhythms, metabolism and inflammation.

A Broader Pattern Around Eating Windows

The Rutgers findings fit into a growing body of research examining how the timing of meals, separate from their nutritional content, affects long-term health outcomes. In many countries, including the U.K. and the U.S., it is common for people to eat over a 14-hour period, leaving only about 10 hours overnight without food. Research increasingly points to clear health benefits from extending that overnight fasting window; a review published earlier this year found that finishing eating before 7 p.m. was associated with significant improvements in body weight, body mass index, waist circumference, blood pressure and other markers of metabolic health.

Outside Experts Urge Caution

Researchers not involved in the Rutgers trial offered a generally positive but measured response to the findings, noting both plausible mechanisms and important caveats. Professor Wendy Hall, head of nutritional sciences at King’s College London, said confining mealtimes to a narrow window may plausibly benefit brain health through multiple pathways. “Time-restricted eating is a plausible approach to supporting cognitive health in midlife and older adults with overweight, not only because it may help with weight management but also because avoiding large meals late in the evening may improve blood sugar control, vascular function and inflammation,” Hall said.

Hall also cautioned against drawing firm conclusions from the trial’s early findings until the complete data has been formally reviewed. Hall noted that the findings were preliminary and said it was important to see the full peer-reviewed study to determine whether any improvements observed were clinically meaningful.

With the current findings still awaiting full peer review and publication, researchers say larger, more rigorous trials will be needed to confirm whether restricting eating to a narrow daily window genuinely protects cognitive function in older adults, or whether other factors linked to the study’s small sample size may have influenced the results. In the meantime, the research adds to a growing scientific interest in meal timing as a potentially low-cost, accessible strategy for supporting brain health alongside other established interventions like regular physical activity and management of cardiovascular risk factors.

KPMG has published its half year private enteprise barometer

Just over three-fifths of private business owners in Wales are confident of delivering growth in the second half of this year according to professional advisory firm KPMG.

At the start of the year, KPMG’s annual private enterprise barometer showed that 89% of private firms in Wales expressed confidence in their growth prospects over the next year. However, at the half year point that had fallen to 61%.

Six months on, following a challenging period for the UK and global economy amid instability in global energy markets, persistent inflation and trade

For the UK as a whole confidence has fallen 87% to 80%.

Despite this, technology remains a leading investment priority for Wales-based businesses, with 55% identifying areas such as artificial intelligence (AI), cyber security and broader digital transformation as key focuses.

Diversification also remains firmly on the agenda, with 54% of businesses across the region looking to expand their service offerings and broaden their client base. This represents a small decrease from 57% at the start of 2026 and is down nine percentage points against the current national average.

Of businesses considering how to fund their growth plans, appetite for private equity investment is more subdued compared to the beginning of the year, with two-fifths (40%) of respondents identifying private equity as a way to fund their growth ambitions – down five points on the UK average (45%) and seven percentage points below the 47% recorded five months ago.

Instead, almost half (49%) of businesses are turning to their own balance sheets to help fund their growth plans, reflecting a growing preference to retain control and rely on internal resources amid ongoing economic uncertainty.

Amid a dip in confidence, businesses remain alert to the challenges ahead. Almost half (48%) of businesses in Wales identified inflation and ongoing cost pressures as the two biggest short-term risks facing their organisations. At the same time, firms are looking to policymakers to help strengthen long-term resilience.

When asked about the autumn Budget, more than two fifths (43%) of Welsh firms would like to see growth-focused investment and the industrial strategy prioritised by the incoming Chancellor.

David Williams, Wales and south west of England office senior partner at KPMG UK, said: “This dip in Welsh business confidence during the first half of 2026 reflects a combination of persistent cost pressures, global uncertainty and political change closer to home. However, the headline figure doesn’t tell the whole story, and there remain clear signs of ambition among Welsh businesses.

“The Senedd election in May marked a significant change in Wales’s political landscape. A period of transition can naturally lead some businesses to pause while they wait for greater clarity around future priorities. Certainty and consistency, as the new administration’s plans take shape, should help businesses plan and invest with more confidence.

“Encouragingly, appetite for technology investment has encouragingly, appetite for technology investment has increased since the beginning of the year. This reflects both the strength of Wales’s technology ecosystem and the determination of Welsh businesses to use innovation to improve productivity and pursue growth.”

Robinhood users began reporting problems accessing the popular trading app Tuesday morning, according to outage-tracking service Downdetector, with the disruption surfacing in the middle of one of the most volatile global trading sessions in recent months.

Downdetector said user reports indicated problems with Robinhood beginning around 8:43 a.m. Eastern time Tuesday, prompting the tracking service to post about the disruption on X using the hashtag #RobinhoodDown.

A Disruption Amid Historic Market Turmoil

Tuesday’s reported outage comes on a day when global markets experienced extraordinary volatility, driven by a steep selloff in chip and memory stocks that sent South Korea’s Kospi index plunging more than 10% and triggered a wave of selling across major U.S. technology names. Given the scale of Tuesday’s market swings, elevated trading volume on platforms like Robinhood is a common contributing factor to app slowdowns and outages, as brokerages’ systems come under heavier strain during periods of intense investor activity.

Robinhood’s History With High-Volatility Outages

Tuesday’s reported issues fit a well-documented pattern for Robinhood, which has faced repeated criticism over the years for experiencing service disruptions specifically during periods of extreme market activity, when demand on its trading infrastructure spikes sharply. The company has previously suffered high-profile outages coinciding with some of the most turbulent trading days in recent memory, including a notable episode in which the app went down after already being down one week earlier during one of the busiest trading days of that year. In that earlier case, Robinhood’s team posted an update on its support account, saying that trading had been “partially restored” and that the company’s team was “working to get our platform fully back up and running.”

A Pattern That Has Drawn Regulatory and Legal Scrutiny

Robinhood’s history of outages during volatile trading periods has previously resulted in legal consequences for the company. Robinhood Markets Inc. agreed in principle to settle a proposed class action filed by customers in the United States who claimed the investment app’s outages in March 2020 shut them out of trading during pandemic-related market volatility. That lawsuit sought damages for a class of all U.S. users who held stock or options during outages that took place on March 2, 3 and 9, 2020, during an especially turbulent stretch for financial markets amid the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Following one particularly prolonged outage, the company said it would consider offering billing credits or other undisclosed forms of compensation to affected customers, while emphasizing that no customer data, information or funds were lost during the disruption. That earlier outage, which the company said began at 6:30 a.m. Pacific time on a Monday, did not fully resolve until 11 p.m. Pacific time the same day, leaving users locked out of trading for the better part of a full day.

Current Official Status Checks

Independent outage-monitoring services offered a more measured picture of Tuesday’s disruption than the raw volume of social media reports might suggest. As of recent checks, some third-party monitoring tools reported Robinhood as largely operational, with only a small number of user-submitted outage reports logged over the prior 24-hour period, a pattern that is not unusual in the early stages of a developing outage before broader confirmation emerges.

Robinhood itself has scaled back its own public-facing outage communication in recent times. The company’s dedicated status page has been retired, with Robinhood instead directing customers to its support account on X, @AskRobinhood, for information regarding system outages, scheduled maintenance or live updates during service disruptions.

A Brokerage Built for High-Volume, High-Volatility Trading

Robinhood has built its business around offering commission-free access to stocks, exchange-traded funds, options and cryptocurrencies, a model that helped the company attract a large base of retail investors, particularly since its rise to prominence during the pandemic-era trading boom. That same business model, however, has also made the platform particularly vulnerable to periods when trading volume surges unexpectedly, since spikes in user activity can strain the technical infrastructure supporting real-time trade execution.

With global markets continuing to experience heightened volatility Tuesday amid the broader technology stock selloff, Robinhood users experiencing access problems are encouraged to check the company’s support channels on X for updates, given the retirement of its dedicated status page. Given the company’s history of prior outages coinciding with high-volatility trading sessions, affected users may also want to monitor whether Tuesday’s reported issues are formally acknowledged by the company or resolve quickly as trading volumes normalize later in the session. As of Tuesday morning, Robinhood had not issued a public statement addressing the specific cause of the reported disruption.

HYBE, the South Korean entertainment giant behind BTS, posted its highest-ever quarterly results Tuesday, powered by a surge in concert, album and merchandise sales tied to comebacks and expanded world tours across its roster of K-pop groups, even as the company’s shares plunged more than 16% amid a broader selloff across South Korean markets.

HYBE said on the 28th that it posted second-quarter consolidated revenue of 1.45 trillion won and operating profit of 170.9 billion won, marking record highs on both fronts.

A Historic Quarter for Revenue and Profit

Tuesday’s results marked several milestones for the company that had not previously been achieved in a single quarter. Both revenue and operating profit hit all-time quarterly highs, with quarterly revenue topping 1 trillion won and operating profit surpassing 100 billion won for the first time in the company’s history. Cumulative first-half revenue also exceeded 2 trillion won for the first time.

Where the Growth Came From

The company’s revenue growth was spread across its core business segments, with concerts, albums and licensed merchandise all contributing to the record results. By segment, concert revenue reached 647.7 billion won and album revenue totaled 326.8 billion won. The merchandise and licensing segment also set a record high at 310.6 billion won, helped by the expansion of concert activity, while the company’s operating margin came in at 11.8%, remaining in double digits.

BTS Leads the Charge

BTS, which began a world tour in April following the group’s return from military service, was cited as a primary driver of the quarter’s growth. According to global music data analytics firm Luminate, the group’s new album “ARIRANG” ranked No. 1 in U.S. vinyl and CD sales. The world tour also generated broader economic ripple effects, boosting consumption and tourism demand in the regions hosting the group’s concerts.

A Deep Roster of Contributing Acts

BTS was far from the only act driving HYBE’s record quarter, with the company’s broader roster posting strong results across the board. In the first half, every HYBE artist released a new album, and HYBE artists accounted for half of the U.S. top 10 CD sellers during that period. In Korea’s official album sales tally, seven teams besides BTS, including Tomorrow X Together, Enhypen, and Team, Boynextdoor, TWS and Katseye, achieved million-seller status.

Katseye in particular stood out with a strong run of accolades and sales figures during the period. Katseye won three awards at the 2026 American Music Awards, and the group’s cumulative sales for its first and second mini albums surpassed 5.25 million copies. A joint digital single from LE SSERAFIM, ILLIT and Katseye titled “ICONIC BY MISTAKE” also drew a strong response overseas.

An Aggressive Touring Schedule

Live performances played a central role in the quarter’s results, with HYBE’s roster maintaining an unusually heavy touring calendar. HYBE music group artists held 119 shows across 12 teams in the first half of the year, with more than 200 additional shows slated for the second half. Enhypen, LE SSERAFIM, Boynextdoor and Katseye are among the acts set to embark on world tours in the months ahead.

Weverse Fan Platform Also Sets Records

Beyond music sales and touring revenue, HYBE’s fan engagement platform also posted its strongest performance to date during the quarter. Fan platform Weverse continued to grow, with average monthly active users reaching a record high of 14.43 million in the second quarter. Total payment volume and average revenue per paying user rose 12% and 24%, respectively, from the previous quarter.

CEO Highlights the Results

HYBE CEO Lee Jae-sang framed the quarter’s performance as evidence of the company’s broader significance to South Korea’s cultural export industry. “In the second quarter, HYBE redefined the global entertainment market and proved through results that it functions as a core export infrastructure for the domestic cultural industry,” Lee said, adding that the results reflect steady efforts toward business innovation and that the company will continue pursuing strategies for expansion and growth.

Shares Sink Despite Record Results

Despite the historic quarterly performance, HYBE’s stock did not escape Tuesday’s broader market turmoil in South Korea. Shares of HYBE fell 16.09%, or 36,200 won, to close at 188,800 won, caught up in a market-wide selloff that had little to do with the company’s own results.

A Brutal Day for South Korean Markets

HYBE’s decline came amid one of the most severe single-day selloffs South Korean markets have experienced this year, driven primarily by a rout in semiconductor and memory chip stocks. On the 28th, the Kospi index fell more than 8%, triggering a circuit breaker on the main board, marking the third such trading halt in South Korea during the month of July alone. That broader index-wide selloff, driven by heavy losses in chipmakers Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix, appears to have dragged down shares across the market, including strong performers like HYBE, regardless of individual company fundamentals.

A Disconnect Between Fundamentals and Stock Performance

Tuesday’s trading illustrates a disconnect between HYBE’s underlying business performance and how its stock traded on the day results were announced, a pattern not uncommon when broader market forces overwhelm company-specific news. Even as HYBE delivered record revenue, record operating profit and a growing base of paying fans on its Weverse platform, its shares moved primarily in line with the sharp, market-wide declines affecting nearly every major stock on the Kospi that day.

With more than 200 additional shows planned across HYBE’s roster for the second half of the year, and several major acts, including Enhypen, LE SSERAFIM, Boynextdoor and Katseye, preparing for upcoming world tours, the company appears positioned to build on Tuesday’s record results in the coming quarters. Whether HYBE’s stock can recover from Tuesday’s steep decline is likely to depend heavily on how quickly the broader selloff across South Korean chip and technology stocks stabilizes, rather than on any change in the company’s own underlying business momentum.

Shares of Coforge surged 6.64% to Rs 1,630.20 in Tuesday’s trading session after the IT services firm reported a strong Q1FY27 performance. Net profit jumped 63% YoY, while revenue grew 49%, reflecting strong business momentum and improved operational efficiency. However, profit declined 15% sequentially compared with the previous quarter due to quarterly fluctuations.

Coforge reported revenue from operations of Rs 5,527.7 crore for the quarter ended June 2026, registering a growth of 24% quarter-on-quarter (QoQ) and 49% YoY. The company had reported revenue of Rs 4,450.4 crore in March 2026 and Rs 3,704.4 crore in June 2025. The strong revenue performance was supported by healthy demand across geographies, new deal wins, and continued momentum in AI-led engineering, cloud, and data services.

The company posted a consolidated net profit of Rs 518.6 crore in Q1FY27, down 15% from Rs 612.3 crore in the March 2026 quarter. On a yearly basis, however, profit increased significantly by 63% compared with Rs 317.4 crore reported in the same quarter last year. Profitability improvement was reflected in strong margin expansion during the quarter.

Coforge reported EBITDA of Rs 1,123.3 crore ($120.3 million), marking a 74% YoY growth in rupee terms and a 55% increase in dollar terms.

EBITDA margin expanded to 20.3%, improving by 285 basis points compared with the year-ago period.

EBIT stood at Rs 882.2 crore ($94.5 million), rising 101% YoY in rupee terms and 80% in dollar terms. EBIT margin improved to 16%, expanding by 414 basis points YoY.

Record order book strengthens growth outlook

The company reported a strong order intake of $691 million in total contract value (TCV) during the quarter.
Coforge’s executable order book for the next 12 months stood at $2.23 billion, increasing 27% QoQ and 44% YoY, providing strong revenue visibility for the coming quarters.
During the quarter, the company secured four large deals across North America, Europe, and Latin America, further strengthening its global growth pipeline.

AI-Led Services Drive Growth

Coforge highlighted that 86% of its revenues are now generated from AI-led engineering, data, and cloud services. The company said AI adoption across client delivery and internal operations has contributed significantly to margin expansion and business growth.

Commenting on the performance, Sudhir Singh, Chief Executive Officer and Executive Director of Coforge Ltd, said: “Q1 performance reflects the strength of our differentiated capabilities and execution intensity. With a next twelve-month signed order book of $2.23 billion, a strong large deal pipeline, and 86% of revenues coming from AI-led engineering, data, and cloud services, we are positioned to remain among the industry growth leaders.”

He added that the operational integration of Encora has been completed and that strong demand, record visibility, and expanding AI-led opportunities are expected to make FY27 a strong year for the company.

Dividend Announcement

The company’s Board has recommended an interim dividend of Rs 4 per share. The record date for determining eligible shareholders for the dividend payout has been fixed as August 3, 2026.

Stock Performance and Technical Outlook

Coforge shares have gained around 27% in the last three months. The company currently commands a market capitalization of approximately Rs 67,660 crore.

The stock’s 52-week high stands at Rs 1,989.70.

From a technical perspective, the stock’s 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) stands at 57.3. An RSI below 30 generally indicates oversold conditions, while a reading above 70 suggests overbought levels. The stock is currently trading with bullish moving average indicators, suggesting positive momentum.

With strong order visibility, expanding margins, AI-driven growth opportunities, and improving operational efficiency, Coforge remains positioned as one of the key players benefiting from the ongoing digital transformation and enterprise AI adoption cycle.

(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of Economic Times)

Foreword

By Rick Rieder, Tom Parker & Pat Haskell

Old assumptions, new markets

For much of recent history, fixed income investors have operated within a familiar policy framework. Central banks anchored markets, forward guidance often mattered more

Rich Paul, the longtime agent for LeBron James, is facing backlash from Los Angeles Lakers fans after suggesting that late Lakers great Kobe Bryant would have approved of James’ decision to sign with the Philadelphia 76ers, James’ hometown franchise.

The comments came after James signed a two-year, $8 million contract to join the Sixers, with Paul invoking Bryant’s name while discussing the move on his “Game Over” podcast.

Paul’s Comments on Kobe Bryant

Paul suggested that Bryant, who died in a helicopter crash more than six years ago, would have respected the competitive nature of James’ decision to join a new team late in his career. “This is something Kobe would be extremely… I don’t know if proud’s the right word, but like ‘hell yeah,’” Paul said on Monday.

Paul elaborated on why he believed Bryant would have viewed the move favorably, framing it as evidence of James’ continued competitive drive. “You know, because — it’s a competitive move, it’s a challenge. It shows that this guy really wants to compete,” Paul added.

Fans React Sharply on Social Media

The comments quickly drew criticism from Lakers fans online, many of whom objected to Paul speculating about what a deceased public figure would have thought or said. According to The Spun, Lakers fans on social media have been attacking Paul for assuming what Bryant would have said, more than six years after his passing.

Several fans expressed frustration directly on social platforms. “Lets not put words into dead peoples mouths,” one fan wrote. Another added, “Bro what has this story come to, enough already. Nobody knows what Kobe would’ve thought so let’s stop it with that.” A third fan pushed back on the relevance of invoking Bryant at all in the context of James’ move to Philadelphia, writing, “Respect to Kobe’s legacy, but not everything has to be made about him. He never played for the 76ers.” Another fan simply wrote, “Don’t talk about Kobe like that.”

Why James Chose the Sixers

James addressed his reasoning for the move directly in what he described as his “Last Decision” statement, emphasizing that the choice was driven by a desire to compete for another championship rather than by family considerations or financial motivations. “I still want to compete, to win and to have a chance at the feeling of winning another championship,” James wrote, before expressing enthusiasm about teaming up with fellow All-Stars Tyrese Maxey, Jaylen Brown and Joel Embiid on Philadelphia’s roster.

James also spoke to his broader ambitions for the franchise and its fan base in the statement. “I believe I can help make the Philadelphia 76ers a championship team and I am so excited to energize a new fan base and start this incredible journey one last time,” he wrote.

Personal and Basketball Factors Behind the Decision

Beyond the on-court motivations James cited publicly, multiple reports have pointed to additional personal factors that played into his decision to sign with Philadelphia. Per multiple insiders, James also chose Philadelphia due to its proximity to New York City, where he intends to stay during the course of the 82-game regular season.

ESPN’s Ramona Shelburne offered additional context on James’ decision-making process on Monday, reporting that basketball fit ultimately outweighed other suitors’ offers. James reportedly felt that the Sixers had a higher collection of high-IQ players than his other leading suitors, the Golden State Warriors, Miami Heat and Cleveland Cavaliers.

Shelburne detailed the reasoning behind that assessment further. “James ultimately decided that the Sixers had the kind of high IQ basketball players and high-end talent he was looking for,” Shelburne reported.

Longstanding Relationships Played a Role

Personal relationships within the Sixers organization also factored significantly into James’ decision, according to Shelburne’s reporting, particularly connections dating back decades. “His comfort level with Bob Myers and new general manager Mike Gansey, whom he’d known from their days as high schoolers in Ohio — Gansey was the runner-up to James for Ohio’s Mr. Basketball in 2001 — and shared time together in Cleveland, helped the cause,” Shelburne reported. “As did his agent Rich Paul’s strong working relationship with Philadelphia owners Josh Harris and David Blitzer.”

A Complicated Legacy for James in Los Angeles

The backlash toward Paul’s comments reflects broader sensitivities among Lakers fans regarding how James’ departure from the franchise is being framed, particularly given the team’s storied history and Bryant’s enduring status as one of the most beloved figures in franchise history. James spent eight seasons with the Lakers, helping deliver the team’s 2020 championship before ultimately signing with Philadelphia this offseason following a shift in the franchise’s long-term direction after the team’s blockbuster trade for Luka Doncic last year.

Paul’s Role as James’ Longtime Agent

Paul has served as James’ agent throughout much of his NBA career and has become one of the most prominent figures in basketball representation through his agency, Klutch Sports Group. His comments on the “Game Over” podcast reflect the kind of public commentary Paul has increasingly offered on James’ career decisions, though Monday’s remarks specifically drew criticism for the way they framed Bryant’s presumed reaction to a move involving a rival organization Bryant never played for during his own career.

As the backlash over Paul’s comments continues to circulate on social media, attention is likely to remain focused on how James’ move to Philadelphia is received more broadly by Lakers fans in the coming weeks, particularly as training camps open across the league and James prepares for his 24th NBA season. Whether Paul or James directly address the criticism surrounding the Bryant comments remains to be seen, though the episode underscores the emotional weight that still surrounds any public discussion connecting James’ career decisions to Bryant’s legacy within the Lakers organization.

Hundreds of user conversations with Anthropic’s Claude chatbot were found to have been publicly accessible through search engines, exposing personal and work-related information that users had believed was shared only with specific recipients rather than the broader internet.

Links to the chats, some containing sensitive personal and professional details, would surface when users of search engines like Google entered site-specific search terms, according to a report from the BBC.

How the Exposure Happened

The issue stemmed from Claude’s “share” feature, which allows users to generate a link to a specific conversation for others to view. The searches showed Claude chats for which a user had decided to “share” a link had been saved by search engines like Google, leaving them accessible to the broader public rather than remaining limited to whoever the user intended to share the link with directly.

The scale of the exposure was substantial before it was addressed. Users on Reddit initially discovered the publicly available chats, which covered more than 200 conversations with Claude across at least 25 pages of search results, some of which had taken place just weeks before being discovered.

Anthropic’s Response

The search availability of the chat logs was removed over the weekend, though many of the exposed conversations had already been saved and shared widely online by the time the fix was implemented.

An Anthropic spokeswoman addressed the situation, emphasizing that users retain control over whether their conversations become shareable in the first place. She said links to conversations were “not guessable or discoverable unless people choose to share them themselves.”

The spokeswoman further explained how the platform treats conversations once a user opts to share them. “When someone shares a conversation, they are making that content publicly accessible, and like other public web content, it may be archived by third-party services,” the spokeswoman added.

A Gap in How the Feature Is Explained to Users

The BBC’s reporting noted a potential disconnect between how Claude’s sharing feature is presented to users and what actually happens to shared links once created. The share option within Claude tells a user that “anyone with the link” may view the contents of that link, but does not explicitly state that the link may end up in Google and other search results, a distinction that appears to have caught some users off guard when their conversations turned up in ordinary web searches.

What Was Exposed

The exposed conversations spanned a wide range of topics and use cases, some of which involved potentially sensitive personal or professional information. Chat logs included a user asking Claude last year whether it wanted “to help me or do you want to help anthropic more,” to which the chatbot responded in part, “I experience something like wanting to help you.”

Other conversations touched on more work-related and creative uses of the tool. In one conversation from April, a user prompted Claude to draft an unpublished blog post about cloud security involving details of a corporate project. In another exchange from last month, a user asked Claude how to “become become Nine-tailed fox,” later clarifying they wanted to literally transform from human to the mythical creature, a request Claude responded to by attempting to show the user an AI-generated image claiming they had been given “fully functional fox powers.”

Beyond these more unusual exchanges, the exposed logs also included more conventionally sensitive material. Other conversations with Claude included users seeking help with their CVs, including their names, contact information and work history. Some users even conducted what appeared to be proprietary research for their work, such as in healthcare, including transcripts of private conversations, raising particular concern given the potentially confidential nature of that material.

Not the First AI Chatbot to Face This Issue

Tuesday’s revelations echo similar incidents that have previously affected other major AI chatbot platforms. When OpenAI last year experienced an almost identical issue with ChatGPT chat logs being made publicly accessible, the company ultimately changed the ease with which such logs were accessible, adjusting its sharing mechanism in response to the exposure.

A comparable episode also affected Grok, the AI chatbot built into Elon Musk’s social platform X. Grok also last year saw hundreds of thousands of chat logs made publicly available through online search, an incident of considerably larger scale than the one now affecting Claude.

Google’s Role and Response

Search engines themselves have pushed back on suggestions that they bear direct responsibility for indexing shared chat links, framing the issue as one governed by the choices of individual website owners. A spokesman for Google made clear to the BBC that the company does not control “what pages are made public on the web,” saying instead that responsibility for that lies with the websites themselves.

Google described the tools available to site operators for managing how their content appears in search results. “We give site owners clear controls to decide whether pages can be crawled or indexed, and we always respect those directives,” the spokesman said.

Given that the indexing of the Claude chat logs is no longer occurring, it appears likely that Anthropic used available tools to quickly block the chat log links from search results, a process that Google has described as straightforward for a website operator to initiate once identified, though it must be triggered by the site owner itself rather than automatically by the search engine.

Other Search Engines Also Affected

Beyond Google, the exposed Claude chat logs reportedly also appeared through other major search engines. Other search engines including Bing, Brave and Duck Duck Go, through which the Claude chat logs also appeared, were approached for comment as part of the BBC’s reporting.

With the immediate search exposure now addressed, questions remain about how many of the previously indexed conversations may still be accessible through cached versions, third-party archives, or screenshots that were saved and circulated before Anthropic removed the links from search results over the weekend. The incident is likely to renew broader scrutiny of how AI companies design and communicate their sharing features, particularly given that this marks at least the third major chatbot platform in the past year to experience a similar exposure of user conversations through standard web search.