A British inventor built one of the world’s most recognisable home appliance brands not with a single breakthrough, but with 5,127 failed attempts before landing on one that worked. Sir James Dyson‘s now-famous cleaner began as an answer to an ordinary household annoyance, a vacuum that kept losing suction, and turned into a years-long grind of trial, error and redesign that most people would have walked away from long before the finish line.

Also Read: ‘We Must Act Now’: Eric Schmidt, Reid Hoffman, Joseph Stiglitz among 200 who just sounded an alarm on AI

That number, 5,127, has become something of a shorthand for stubbornness in engineering circles. But the real story sitting underneath it is less about the count and more about what Dyson chose to do with every failure along the way, and what he refused to do when people told him his finished product looked wrong.

Thousands Of Broken Prototypes Before One Finally Worked

Dyson’s starting point wasn’t ambition to invent something new. It was irritation with something old. Ordinary vacuum cleaners lost power as their bags filled with dust, and rather than shrug it off as a fact of life, he began picking apart why it happened at all.

That question turned into a workshop obsession. Model after model came off the bench, and model after model fell short, sometimes by a little, sometimes by a lot. Instead of treating each dud as proof he was on the wrong track, Dyson reportedly read each one as a clue. A weak seal here, a badly shaped cyclone there, every miss narrowed down what the eventual fix needed to look like.

By the time working prototype number 5,127 came together, the machine could hold its suction without a disposable bag at all, the feature that would go on to define the entire product line.

Retailers Wanted The See-Through Bin Gone. Dyson Said No.

Building the thing was only half the battle. Selling people on it was the other. One detail in particular made buyers nervous in the early days: a clear plastic bin that let anyone see exactly what the machine had just sucked off their carpet. Retailers reportedly pushed back hard, arguing shoppers wouldn’t want a front-row seat to their own household dirt and that the see-through design should be scrapped.Dyson’s team saw it the opposite way. To them, the transparent bin wasn’t a flaw to hide, it was proof the machine was doing its job, visible at a glance. So despite the pressure, they kept it exactly as designed.

Also Read: Crows hold grudges for nearly a decade, they never forget a face, and even teach their chicks to hate the same face

It’s a small decision, but it says something about how Dyson has approached criticism throughout his career: listen, weigh it, and don’t let outside doubt override a idea before it’s even had a chance to be tested in the real world.

His Real Formula: Get Annoyed, Then Fix It

Ask Dyson where good ideas come from and the answer isn’t lightning-bolt inspiration, it’s low-grade daily annoyance. He has repeatedly pointed to the small, tolerated inconveniences of ordinary life, a gadget that half-works, a task that’s more fiddly than it should be, as the real starting line for invention.

Most people shrug those moments off. Dyson‘s argument is that they’re worth stopping for, because irritation is often the first sign that something has been designed badly, and badly designed things can usually be designed better.

Shares of IT services company HCL Tech slipped 3.1% to Rs 1,183 on the BSE on Tuesday despite reporting a 20% year-on-year (YoY) growth in consolidated net profit to Rs 4,624 crore for the first quarter. The figure stood at Rs 3,843 crore in the year-ago quarter.

Revenue from operations for the June quarter increased 13% YoY to Rs 34,579 crore, compared with Rs 30,349 crore in the corresponding quarter last year.

The company retained its FY27 constant currency guidance. It expects overall revenue growth of 1-4% YoY in constant currency, services revenue growth of 1.5-4.5%, and an EBIT margin of 17.5-18.5%.

HCL Tech share price: Buy, sell or hold?

Nomura maintained its ‘Buy’ rating on HCL Tech with a revised target price of Rs 1,290, implying an upside of around 6%. The brokerage said HCL Tech’s Q1FY27 revenue of $3.65 billion, which declined 0.5% QoQ but grew 2.6% YoY in constant currency terms, was ahead of its expectations.
HCL Tech also clarified that the over $1 billion mega deal signed in early July will see a meaningful ramp-up only in Q1FY28. Given unchanged macro conditions and continued weakness in two accounts, the company retained its guidance. Nomura expects the completed JasperSoft acquisition to contribute around $45 million to FY27 revenue and has marginally raised its FY27-28 revenue growth forecast to 3.1–5.3%, from 2–4.5% earlier. It also increased its FY27-28 EPS estimates by 2–3%, reflecting the Q1 performance and the acquisition.

Motilal Oswal retained its Buy rating on HCL Tech with a target price of Rs 1,450 (19% upside). The brokerage said both revenue and total contract value (TCV) exceeded expectations, while margins were largely in line with estimates. MOSL believes investments in Sarvam and the AI data centre strengthen HCL Tech’s long-term AI positioning and continues to view the company as its preferred large-cap IT pick.
Read more: HCLTech FY guidance stays muted despite $2.4 billion deal momentum
JM Financial maintained its ‘Reduce’ rating on the IT major with a revised target price of Rs 1,100, implying around 10% downside. The brokerage said both revenue and margins exceeded expectations, with services revenue declining 0.7% QoQ in constant currency against its estimate of a 1.5% decline, while services EBIT margin came in at 16.7%, above its 16.3% estimate.
Also read: HCLTech to invest Rs 3,500 crore in data centre business
JM Financial said the healthy order book provides some comfort, prompting it to raise its target valuation multiple to 15x from 14x. It also marginally revised its FY27-29 earnings estimates and increased its target price to Rs 1,100 from Rs 1,020. However, it noted that the stock trades at 16x FY28E consensus EPS, a 17% premium to Infosys despite a similar organic growth profile.

Emkay maintained its Add rating with a target price of Rs 1,250 against the current market price of Rs 1,221. The brokerage noted that revenue declined 0.5% QoQ in constant currency due to seasonal weakness, while EBIT margin improved 40 basis points to 16.9%. It highlighted strong net new deal bookings of $2.4 billion, retention of FY27 revenue growth guidance at 1-4% in constant currency terms, and a 10.6% sequential rise in advanced AI revenue to $171 million. It also viewed the planned investment of up to Rs 3,500 crore in a 50 MW AI data centre as a positive long-term step.

Nuvama retained its Hold rating on HCL Tech while lowering the target price to Rs 1,300 (6.5% upside) from Rs 1,400. The brokerage described the June quarter as good but said the overall outlook remains guarded.

360 One maintained its ‘Hold’ rating on HCL Tech and raised its target price to Rs 1,200 from Rs 1,180. The brokerage believes the company’s relatively stronger growth profile should continue to justify a valuation premium of around 15% over its larger peers. It added that while HCL Tech’s portfolio is better positioned to withstand pricing pressure, broader industry headwinds are likely to limit meaningful near-term growth. The brokerage has factored in an EPS CAGR of 11.4% over FY26-28 and values the stock at 15x FY28E EPS.

(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)

Axis has assigned a target price of Rs 1,000, implying an upside of 19% from current market levels. It is a leading owner, developer, and asset manager of high-end hotels in India, primarily operating in key metro cities such as Mumbai, Hyderabad, Bengaluru, and Pune. The company’s portfolio comprises luxury and upper upscale hotels managed by renowned global brands like Marriott, Westin, and Four Points.

As anxiety mounts over the projected 2032 depletion of the Social Security Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) Trust Fund, a viral online trend is urging Americans to claim their retirement benefits as early as age 62.

But personal finance expert and Ramsey Solutions personality George Kamel is pushing back on the internet hysteria, telling Fox News Digital that the panic mirrors the “toilet paper rush during COVID,” and warning that filing early out of fear locks in a permanent “pay cut, not freedom.”

“These headlines are classic fearmongering, and they are not based in reality. There’s a lot of context left out,” Kamel said. “When you see, ‘Depletion 2032 [for] Social Security,’ it’s like the toilet paper rush during COVID. Everyone’s like, ‘I gotta go to the store and let’s clear the shelves, there’s not gonna be any left for me.’”

“The truth is, that fund was surplus from pre-funding for the baby boomer generation and to smooth out bumps along the way. So this does not mean Social Security is going to go away. A worst-case scenario is a 22% cut in monthly benefits. So that’s a far cry from it going to zero and bankrupting,” he continued.

OPINION: AMERICAN’S RETIREMENT SYSTEM IS BROKEN. TRUMP MAY HAVE FOUND A BOLD FIX

After the Social Security Administration released its 2026 Trustees Report — which confirmed that the federal retirement safety net is less than seven years away from reserve depletion — financial advisor and author Suze Orman called early claiming “bad advice,” warning that it will lock retirees into a permanent 30% reduction in monthly benefits that cannot be undone.

Kamel agreed with the emotional danger of claiming Social Security early, but he critiqued the rigid “always-wait” rule.

“She’s right that there is a lot of emotion here, and fear is a bad reason to go grab it at 62. Now, where we might disagree is that you should always wait… There’s a lot of factors that come into play of deciding when to take Social Security. And it really depends on your life, your health, your income, your family situation,” he explained.

“You’re better off talking to a doctor than looking at a government chart at average life expectancies to make this choice,” he added. “So there is no magic age, it’s not always 62, it’s not always 70. That’s a headline, not a plan.”

Breaking down the math even further, Kamel argued that the government treats your full retirement age at 67 as the 100% baseline benefit. Claiming five years early, at 62, forces you to accept a permanent 30% pay cut for the rest of your life. However, if you delay claiming until age 70, the system rewards your patience with a permanent 24% increase in benefits.

“The truth is, if you need to take it at 62, you probably aren’t doing great with your retirement overall. And if you can wait till 70, you likely didn’t really need it in the first place. So it’s kind of a catch-22 even making this decision, but it is personal,” he said. “And the math assumes that $1 at 95 is the same as $1 at 65, and that you live long enough. And that’s just not the case.”

“I’m not a fan of relying on a government program to fund your life forever. That’s a scary thought,” Kamel added. “And so early claiming is not control. It’s really just a 30% smaller check forever. So it’s a pay cut, it’s not freedom.”

“You reap what you sow. That’s the fact of the matter. So if you plant corn, you’re gonna have some corn at the end of this road. And if you don’t plant anything, don’t be surprised when you’re trying to make it off of a Social Security check.”

– George Kamel

Advertisement

As the 2032 insolvency deadline approaches, many Americans assume a worst-case scenario is inevitable if gridlock continues in Washington. But Kamel said the panic overlooks how the federal government has handled similar fiscal cliffs in the past. Rather than letting the system go bankrupt, he predicts Capitol Hill will pull from its old playbook.

“Seventy million Americans rely on a Social Security payment coming in. And so when you think about that… they’re gonna vote with their wallet. So the chances of any politician deciding to cut this down is going to cost them big time,” he said. “What will likely happen is what happened in 1983… The trust fund is running out and they made several small tweaks, not one sweeping change, in order to help this out.”

“I think the same thing will be true – they might adjust the cost of living adjustment. They might change the full retirement age from 67 to 68 or 69. They might increase the payroll taxes from 6.2% to 6.5%. And so these incremental changes can help it. I don’t see a world where, in 2032, we’re all going, ‘Where’s our money? We’re all gonna retire broke.’”

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

Ultimately, Kamel emphasizes that true financial peace doesn’t come from trying to outsmart a shifting government timeline. Instead of obsessing over what Washington will do to the safety net, he argued that the smartest move Americans can make is to shift their focus entirely to what they can control in their own households.

“You are your best shot at a great retirement. It’s not the government’s job, it’s not Washington’s job, it’s not a headline, it’s not a trust fund date. You control the controllables, and one of those things is creating your own nest egg… There is hope out there. But it’s not in the hands of [the] White House, it’s in yours.”

READ MORE FROM FOX BUSINESS

More than 200 economists, tech bosses and researchers from across the globe have put their names on a short, sharply worded open letter cautioning that artificial intelligence is on track to shake up the job market in a big way, and that governments are lagging behind. Organised by the Stanford Digital Economy Lab, the letter is titled “We Must Act Now,” with the subtitle “A Statement on AI’s Transformation of the Economy.” It runs to just 88 words, and every one of them appears to have been chosen with care.

Also Read: US job cuts: Moody’s chief economist Mark Zandi sees ‘big warning’ signs in June data. Here’s why he’s worried about the labour market

That brevity is exactly what makes the letter stand out. Getting rival camps, the people building AI and the economists who study what AI might break, to agree on anything is rare. Getting them to agree in under 100 words is rarer still. That’s the real story here: not just what the letter says, but who is standing behind it.

The Guest List Reads Like A Tech-Economics Power Summit

Scroll through the signatories and a few names jump out immediately. Former Google chief Eric Schmidt is on there. So is LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman. Three Nobel laureates — Joseph Stiglitz, Daron Acemoglu and Simon Johnson — have added their signatures too. From inside the AI industry itself come Google AI lead Jeff Dean, Anthropic co-founder Jack Clark and OpenAI’s finance chief Sarah Friar. Even the so-called “Godfathers of AI,” Yoshua Bengio and Yann LeCun, along with venture capitalist Vinod Khosla, are named.

Put simply, this isn’t a letter from AI skeptics on the outside looking in. Several of the people who signed it are the very ones building the technology being warned about.

So What Does The Letter Actually Say?

Strip away the drama, and the message is fairly simple: AI is going to get a lot more powerful over the next decade, and if policymakers don’t get moving, a lot of people could lose their jobs. Here is the letter, word for word:
‘We Must Act Now’
A Statement on AI’s Transformation of the Economy
AI may become radically more powerful over the next 10 years.

This could drive an unprecedented transformation of our economy, larger than the Industrial Revolution, but unfolding over a vastly shorter time frame. It could bring risks, including large-scale job displacement, as well as opportunities such as major gains in living standards.

Economists, policymakers and technology leaders must act now to understand the economics of transformative AI and to build the incentives, guardrails, and institutions needed to steer AI in a direction that complements humans and benefits society.

Not Everyone Agrees On How Bad It’ll Get

The letter lands at a moment when opinions on AI and jobs are all over the map. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has gone further than most, predicting that AI could wipe out as much as half of all entry-level white-collar jobs within five years. Not everyone shares that level of alarm, many economists and technologists land somewhere in the middle, arguing that AI is more likely to reshape jobs than erase them completely.

Either way, the message from this unusually broad coalition of signatories is the same: the clock is running, and the guardrails aren’t built yet.

Shares of Biocon jumped more than 6% on Tuesday, on track to record the sharpest single day surge in 18 months, as Viatris-owned Mylan is set to sell up to 9.2 crore shares worth up to Rs 3,481 crore, exiting the Indian drugmaker.

Biocon shares jumped more than 6% to trade at Rs 436.15 apiece on Tuesday. If the stock manages to hold on to the gains till the end of the session, then today would mark its best day since January, 2025.

Mylan, which is part of global healthcare company Viatris, planned to sell the stake which represents 5.64% of Biocon’s outstanding shares, according to a term sheet as per a Reuters report. The floor price of the offer was fixed at Rs 378.50 per share, implying a discount of nearly 8% to Biocon’s previous closing price of Rs 410.95 per share. The report added that Citigroup Global Markets India and Jefferies India were the joint bookrunners and brokers for the deal.

Meanwhile, around 4.4 crore shares, or 2.7% equity, changed hands in a block deal in the early trading hours, followed by another block deal that saw 4.6 crore shares change hands, ET Now reported. This brings the total number of shares which were traded in block deals to nearly 9 crore, nearly matching what Mylan was expected to sell, although the seller in the block deals that took place in the morning is yet to be ascertained.

Also Read | Mylan to sell up to $363 million stake in India’s Biocon, term sheet shows

Biocon shareholding pattern

Mylan held 5.64% stake in Biocon at the end of the financial year 2026, according to data on the company’s shareholding pattern available on NSE. Promoter Kiran Mazumdar Shaw held around 30% stake, while Glentec International held around 15% stake.

Around 39 mutual funds held over 15% stake in the company, while insurance companies held more than 6% stake. Nearly 3.74 lakh retail shareholders meanwhile owned 6% stake in the company, as of March 31, 2026.

Biocon share price

Biocon shares sharply jumped more than 6% on Tuesday to trade at Rs 436.15 apiece on NSE, the highest level seen since May 29 this year. The shares of the company have jumped around 7% in one week and 4% in one month.
The shares of the drugmaker have gained around 12% in 2026 so far. In the longer term, Biocon shares have delivered 14% returns over one year, 66% returns over three years and 9% returns over five years.Also Read | Sensex falls 500 points, Nifty slips below 24,100 as US-Iran conflict escalates. What lies ahead?

(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)