Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Business

Burnham urged to act on day one

Published

on

80% of SME Owners Fear for Their Business

Andy Burnham will walk into Downing Street next week with an in-tray already overflowing, but business has told him exactly where to start: energy bills that sit 45 per cent above the G7 average and act, in the words of the CBI and Energy UK, as an “anchor” holding back the economy.

Stripping a suite of green levies out of business energy bills could cut costs by a fifth and deliver a £130 billion boost to the economy by 2050, according to a report from the two lobby groups published on Tuesday, compiled with analysis from Cornwall Insight and the National Institute of Economic and Social Research.

For smaller firms the stakes are immediate. Retailers, food and drink producers and hospitality businesses, the sectors least able to hedge or absorb energy costs, stand to benefit most from the recommendations. That will resonate with the eight in ten SME owners who already fear what a Burnham premiership will mean for their business.

The problem is not new, but it is getting worse. Britain’s electricity prices put firms at a competitive disadvantage, stifle investment and have contributed to the country’s sluggish productivity growth since the 2008 financial crisis, official price data shows. The war in the Middle East has compounded the pain, with the UK’s heavy reliance on imported gas pushing factory costs up at their fastest pace since Black Wednesday.

The report’s central charge is that successive Conservative and Labour governments have spent decades loading the cost of the net-zero transition onto electricity bills. Its remedies include scrapping the renewables obligation, a scheme launched in 2002 requiring suppliers to provide a set quantity of renewable energy, and ditching a two-decade-old levy on businesses using electricity generated outside the UK. The lost revenue, it argues, should be recouped through general taxation or a public fund.

Advertisement

Dhara Vyas, the chief executive of Energy UK, said: “Energy is an essential service that underpins both daily life and economic growth. Yet years of making policy decisions with little regard to the impact on business energy users has left the UK with some of the highest industrial energy costs in the developed world.”

Louise Hellem, the CBI’s chief economist, said: “With a new prime minister coming into office, it’s clear that reducing business energy costs must be a day-one priority. If we want to tackle the cost of living and invest in public services, we need stronger economic growth, and that can’t happen while firms are navigating sky-high energy bills.”

Whether Burnham listens may hinge on who he installs next door. Ed Miliband, seen as his most likely choice to replace Rachel Reeves as chancellor, has rigorously pursued the fastest possible route off fossil fuels as energy secretary, drawing criticism from business groups who argue the private sector is shouldering too much of the net-zero burden. Sowing early tension between Numbers 10 and 11 is the last thing Burnham needs, with voters having deserted Labour over Reeves’s £25 billion payroll tax raid and the botched winter fuel U-turn.

Reeves is expected to strike a valedictory note at the Mansion House dinner this evening, saying the government has been “fixing the foundations, restoring economic stability, and proving our capacity to deliver radical change”.

Advertisement

Burnham, for his part, wants to reindustrialise the economy. The report’s verdict is blunt: that will be impossible “on the back of some of the most expensive electricity in the developed world”. With one in four manufacturers already moving production abroad or weighing it up, SME owners will learn a great deal from the new prime minister’s first appointment, and his first bill.


Paul Jones

Harvard alumni and former New York Times journalist. Editor of Business Matters for over 15 years, the UKs largest business magazine. I am also head of Capital Business Media’s automotive division working for clients such as Red Bull Racing, Honda, Aston Martin and Infiniti.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Business

General Mills in bromate crosshairs

Published

on

General Mills in bromate crosshairs

Florida issues civil subpoena for more information on use.

Continue Reading

Business

Trump’s CFPB overhaul cost Americans $26.5 billion, Sen. Warren says

Published

on

Trump's CFPB overhaul cost Americans $26.5 billion, Sen. Warren says

President Donald Trump (L) and Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA).

Reuters | Getty Images

Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., said Thursday that the Trump administration’s overhaul of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has cost Americans up to $26.5 billion so far, the latest Democratic critique of sweeping changes made to the agency.

Advertisement

In a report shared first with CNBC, Warren said most of that figure comes from moves the CFPB has taken under acting director Russell Vought to roll back rules capping credit card and overdraft fees.

The report comes as Vought faces a Senate oversight hearing Thursday on those and other actions, including dismissing enforcement actions and consent orders and an allegation that the agency recently removed 15 years of consumer data from the CFPB website.

Since taking office last year, the Trump administration has slashed staffing, dropped or narrowed dozens of enforcement cases, and rolled back Biden-era rules to refocus the agency on what officials call its core mission.

Republicans have defended the moves as necessary to rein in what they view as an overreaching regulator. Democrats led by Warren — who conceived and helped set up the agency after the 2008 financial crisis — have argued that the Trump administration has crippled a key consumer financial watchdog and exposed Americans to unfair or deceptive industry practices.

Advertisement

The clash comes as the Senate weighs the nomination of Brian Johnson, a former CFPB deputy director turned Capital One executive, whom President Donald Trump tapped to lead the agency permanently.

Warren’s report attributes up to $15 billion in consumer costs to the CFPB’s decision to abandon a rule capping most credit-card late fees at $8, a regulation the agency previously estimated would save consumers roughly $10 billion annually.

It attributes another $7.5 billion to the repeal of the CFPB’s overdraft fee rule, which would have limited many banks to charging $5 for overdrafts.

The remainder of the estimate comes from the CFPB’s decision to drop more than three dozen enforcement actions and settlements, some of which were set to send payments directly to consumers. That totaled roughly $4 billion, according to the report.

Advertisement

The White House and CFPB did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Ahead of Thursday’s hearing, Warren also sent Vought a letter cataloging what she described as unanswered congressional oversight requests during his tenure running the bureau.

Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.
Continue Reading

Business

ADM joins General Mills and Walmart in regen ag effort

Published

on

ADM joins General Mills and Walmart in regen ag effort

Trio targets 40,000 wheat acres.

Continue Reading

Business

Greece stocks lower at close of trade; Athens General Composite down 0.40%

Published

on


Greece stocks lower at close of trade; Athens General Composite down 0.40%

Continue Reading

Business

Osterweis Capital Management Q3 2026 Strategic Income Outlook

Published

on

Osterweis Capital Management Q3 2026 Strategic Income Outlook

Osterweis Capital Management was founded in 1983 to serve the portfolio management needs of high net worth individuals and institutions. We believe the best way to protect and grow assets is through carefully selected, high conviction portfolios that are designed to capture upside in favorable markets and limit downside during selloffs. We manage equities and fixed income, which are available through mutual funds and separate accounts. Note: This account is not managed or monitored by Osterweis Capital Management, and any messages sent via Seeking Alpha will not receive a response. For inquiries or communication, please use the firm’s official channels. Mutual fund investing involves risk. Principal loss is possible. Distributed by Quasar Distributors, LLC.

Continue Reading

Business

Walmart: The Sell-Off Isn't Over Yet (Rating Upgrade)

Published

on

Palantir: AI SaaS Winner Still Expensive - Bull Trap Plays Out

Walmart: The Sell-Off Isn't Over Yet (Rating Upgrade)

Continue Reading

Business

TSMC Q2: The AI Panic Creates Your Second Chance

Published

on

TSMC Q2: The AI Panic Creates Your Second Chance

TSMC Q2: The AI Panic Creates Your Second Chance

Continue Reading

Business

Wessex Water to be charged over blast that killed four workers

Published

on

Business Live

The Health and Safety Executive has informed the utilities firm of its plan to prosecute

Wessex Water is set to face criminal charges nearly six years after a tragedy that killed four workers at its Avonmouth treatment site near Bristol.

The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) is to prosecute the water company over the deaths of Luke Wheaton, 16, Ray White, 57, Brian Vickery, 63, and Mike James, 64, who died in December 2020.

The four workers, one of whom was an apprentice, were carrying out welding on the roof of an anaerobic digester silo and a spark ignited the gas inside.

Advertisement

Avon & Somerset police initially led a criminal investigation into the blast, but it was dropped in July 2024 because they said at the time the evidence they had gathered did “not reach the extremely high threshold to prosecute” anyone at Wessex Water, or the company itself, for corporate manslaughter.

The HSE took over the investigation and has now confirmed it will be bringing charges against Wessex Water in relation to the explosion.

A spokesperson for the HSE confirmed charges would be brought.

“Following an investigation by the Health and Safety Executive into an incident at Avonmouth on 3 December 2020, which resulted in the deaths of four workers, our Legal Services Division has taken the decision to authorise criminal charges against Wessex Water, for offences under the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act,” a spokesperson said.

Advertisement

Wessex Water, a company owned by Malaysian firm YTL, confirmed it had been told the firm would be charged.

A Wessex Water spokesperson said: “The HSE has informed us of its decision to prosecute. We will always remember Brian Vickery, Ray White, Luke Wheaton and Mike James. Our thoughts are with their families, friends and colleagues.”

In the aftermath of the blast, the grieving families of the four who died paid tribute to their loved ones, asked for respect for their privacy and have made no further comments publicly about the ongoing investigation.

Instead, many of the relatives have got involved in fundraising and other projects to honour their loved ones and create a lasting legacy for them.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Finsbury plans Games Workshop buying spree after M&A windfall

Published

on

Business Live

The FTSE 250 investment trust is preparing to use a windfall from a string of acquisitions in its portfolio to launch a buying spree of shares in Games Workshop, the Warhammer owner

Necromunda is one of the games in the Warhammer universe

Necromunda is one of the games in the Warhammer universe

Nick Train’s Finsbury Income and Growth fund is gearing up to boost its holdings in Games Workshop following a windfall from a series of takeovers within its portfolio.

The FTSE 250 investment trust – whose heritage stretches back more than a century – revealed intentions to deploy both borrowing and proceeds from the buyouts of Schroders and Intertek, where it held stakes, to fund a purchasing campaign targeting the “fantastic” Warhammer owner.

At the closed-end fund’s most recent shareholder briefing, co-manager Madeline Wright highlighted Games Workshop’s robust margins and significant American market expansion as catalysts for a renewed growth trajectory at the company, notwithstanding the fact its share price has already more than tripled over the past four years.

“The appetite for this kind of content is huge,” she told investors, adding: “We’re currently building the position, and we’re going to continue to do that with the increased gearing and – depending on the timing – perhaps the cash from the M&A [mergers and acquisitions] as well.”

Advertisement

The decision represents an unusual instance of portfolio reshuffling at Finsbury, amongst the UK’s largest investment trusts, following the departure of two long-held investments from the public markets this year. Investment manager Schroders and Intertek have both accepted offers from Nuveen and EQT respectively, providing celebrated stockpicker Train with proceeds running into tens of millions of pounds, as reported by City AM.

Earlier this year, the trust also unveiled plans to take on more debt in an attempt to boost returns and demonstrate its “conviction” in a portfolio that has delivered several successive years of lacklustre performance. Finsbury more than tripled its gearing – the term used to describe the amount of debt rolled into a fund or investment – from £29.9m to £100m, leaving the FTSE 250 vehicle with a substantial war chest to deploy into a “collection of outstanding, in most cases world class, UK-listed companies” in the months ahead, it said.

Wright revealed that alongside increasing its stake in Games Workshop, in which the trust first invested in autumn last year, Finsbury would deploy the funds to bolster its positions in flagship holdings such as the London Stock Exchange Group, Sage and Relx. The group would also establish positions in new stocks, she added.

In a separate development, Wright delivered a scathing assessment of Rathbones’ recent clash with the Financial Conduct Authority, which saw the FTSE 100 giant compelled to suspend £900m worth of inflows.

Advertisement

In what were her fund’s first public remarks since the fiasco, she said: “It’s very disappointing that this has happened. From our perspective, there’s going to be an overhang on the shares and the business.

“It’s probably important to note that the management team in place now was not the management team that was in place when this happened,” she added. “And that’s important because if that was not the case, we would probably have been speaking to the board about whether new pairs of eyes were needed.”

Continue Reading

Business

Edwards Lifesciences shares may move 5% on July 23 earnings

Published

on


Edwards Lifesciences shares may move 5% on July 23 earnings

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025