Connect with us

Business

Elon Musk Threatens Legal Action Against Alex Gibney’s ‘Musk’ Documentary, Calls It ‘Hit Piece’ After Venice

Published

on

There are similarities with fellow tech mogul Elon Musk

VENICE, Italy — Elon Musk is threatening legal action against filmmaker Alex Gibney over a nearly four-hour documentary examining the billionaire’s influence across technology, business and politics, following the film’s world premiere at the Venice Film Festival this week, where it received a five-minute standing ovation.

Musk’s attorney, Alex Spiro, sent a letter to Gibney’s production company, Jigsaw Productions, on Sept. 3, putting the team on “formal legal notice” over claims made in the documentary, according to The Hollywood Reporter. The letter specifically focuses on an insinuation the film makes suggesting Musk used his Starlink satellite network to help influence the 2024 U.S. presidential election in favor of President Donald Trump.

Spiro’s letter argued that Gibney’s production failed to properly verify its claims before moving forward with the film.

“You are on notice, before release, that the insinuation is false, that the material refuting it is public, and that you chose not to be told the rest,” Spiro wrote to Jigsaw Productions.

Advertisement

The letter also accused the production of declining multiple opportunities to fact-check its reporting directly with Musk’s team or with individuals who could have offered contradicting testimony.

“This project did not begin as an inquiry,” Spiro wrote. “It began with a conclusion … Because you have refused to screen the film, refused to fact-check it with us, and refused the witnesses who came to you, we have every reason to expect that it contains further statements about Mr. Musk that you know to be false, or whose falsity you have deliberately chosen not to investigate. We therefore have no choice but to put you on formal legal notice regarding your upcoming piece and to reserve all rights. Our door is open if you decide to check your facts with the people who know them.”

Musk himself took to X in the days following the premiere to publicly attack both the film and Gibney directly, despite reportedly not yet having watched the documentary himself.

“Gibney just assembled a hit list of people who either have an axe to grind or don’t even know me,” Musk wrote. “Horrible human.” In a separate post, Musk added: “Gutless Gibney’s fatal flaw of fabricating a false film.” Musk also described the film elsewhere on X as “a hit piece that misses and makes the fatal sin of being boring for 4 hours,” and separately wrote, “Gibney deliberately set out to make a hit piece and lacks any integrity whatsoever.”

Advertisement

Jigsaw Productions responded to Musk’s legal threat with a statement defending Gibney’s journalistic track record.

“Alex Gibney’s films are consistently recognized for their in-depth, fact-driven explorations of influential figures and corporations, coupled with his bold and engaging directorial style,” the statement read. “This approach has garnered him international praise, an Academy Award among other accolades, and a reputation that The Times of London recently lauded as the ‘gold standard for fearless journalistic integrity.’ The right to engage in open debate and fact-based examinations of powerful public figures is protected by the first amendment — something that should be recognized and defended by all Americans, including the associates of Elon Musk, who has proclaimed himself to be a ‘free speech absolutist.’”

The documentary, titled simply “Musk,” runs 225 minutes and examines the tech billionaire’s expanding influence across Tesla, SpaceX, X and his broader political activities. According to Deadline’s review of the film, it takes a particularly critical look at Tesla’s safety record and fatal incidents involving the company’s self-driving technology, with experts featured in the documentary accusing Tesla of overstating its vehicles’ battery range, misleading regulators, and promoting a battery-swapping network specifically to obtain government subsidies. The film also raises concerns about how Musk’s companies collect and could potentially use massive amounts of data to support his broader artificial intelligence ambitions.

Musk declined to participate directly in the documentary, though Gibney has said he had initially invited Musk to take part in the project. Because Musk himself did not sit for interviews, the film reportedly uses an AI-generated version of Musk’s voice to repeat his own previously made public statements throughout the documentary.

Advertisement

The film has drawn strongly positive reviews from critics following its Venice premiere, holding a 100% average critics’ rating on Rotten Tomatoes as of this week. The platform’s synopsis describes the documentary as “an incisive look behind the legend of Elon Musk, the world’s most heralded ‘inventor-entrepreneur’ who has enormous influence on the world in which we all live.”

The dispute between Musk and Gibney is not entirely new. According to The Hollywood Reporter, Musk predicted back in 2023 that the eventual documentary would amount to a “hit piece,” a characterization Gibney reportedly pushed back on at the time before proceeding with the project regardless.

The film’s premiere also drew attention for a separate development involving Ashley St. Clair, who gave birth to Musk’s 13th child last year. According to Variety, St. Clair revealed following the Venice premiere that her decision not to sign a nondisclosure agreement with Musk, one she said would have included a $40 million payment, ultimately allowed her to speak publicly about her former partner within the documentary itself.

“Musk,” distributed by Bleecker Street, is scheduled to hit U.S. theaters in October, following its Venice debut. With Musk’s attorney having formally put the production on legal notice and Musk himself continuing to publicly denounce the film on social media, the documentary’s theatrical release next month appears likely to arrive amid continued public sparring between the world’s wealthiest man and the Oscar-winning filmmaker behind one of the more closely watched documentaries of this year’s festival circuit.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Business

HDFC Bank shares fall 2% to fresh 52-week low despite victory in Credit Suisse AT1 bonds cases in Bahrain

Published

on

HDFC Bank shares fall 2% to fresh 52-week low despite victory in Credit Suisse AT1 bonds cases in Bahrain
Shares of HDFC Bank dropped around 2% on Friday despite positive news regarding the private lender winning all seven cases filed against it in Bahrain by investors in the Credit Suisse AT-1 bonds matter.

India’s largest private lender shares dropped to a fresh 52-week low of Rs 681.90 apiece on Friday. The heavyweight stock has fallen around 4% in a week and 6% in a month, overall plunging around 31% in 2026 so far.

Bahrain court rejects claims against HDFC Bank over Credit Suisse AT1 bonds

HDFC Bank, in a statement to ET, said that the High Civil Court of Bahrain on September 9 passed favourable orders in the final two proceedings against it. Five similar cases had been rejected by the Bahrain court between July and August. This was expected to provide relief to the lender from a key legal overhang arising from allegations of mis-selling of the high-risk securities.

Advertisement

“All seven cases of legal proceedings against HDFC Bank in the CS AT1 bonds investment matter stand rejected by the Bahrain Court,” the bank told ET exclusively. “All allegations were rejected outright by the Court,” it added.

Also read |HDFC Bank says all seven Bahrain claims over Credit Suisse AT1 bonds rejected


The investors had alleged gross negligence, intentional misrepresentation, incorrect customer classification, non-disclosure of product features, misuse of financial leverage and violations of product-suitability principles in connection with their purchases of Credit Suisse AT1 bonds through the bank. HDFC Bank told ET that the court in Bahrain rejected the claims after investors failed to produce sufficient admissible evidence either to substantiate their claims against the lender or demonstrate that losses suffered by them were attributable to the bank.
The disputes stem from the write-down of Credit Suisse’s AT1 securities to zero during its emergency takeover by UBS in March 2023, which resulted in losses for bondholders globally. “Where required, the Bank will stand with its customers. However, the Bank is not in the business of underwriting the investments made by the customers out of their own judgement, and it will therefore defend itself rigorously against any unsubstantiated claims,” HDFC Bank said in its statement.Earlier this year, HDFC Bank terminated three senior executives, including Group Head of Branch Banking Sampath Kumar, over their alleged role in the mis-selling of Additional Tier-1 (AT1) bonds linked to Credit Suisse, sources told ET. The two other executives, Harsh Gupta (Executive Vice President, Middle East, Africa and NRI onshore business) and Payal Mandhyan, were also let go following internal findings.

Gupta and Mandhyan had been suspended in January last year after the bank initiated an internal probe into the alleged mis-selling of debt products at its Dubai branch. The investigation found that several AT1 bond investors claimed they were encouraged to move their foreign currency non-resident (FCNR) deposits from India to Bahrain.

Also read | HDFC Bank sacks 3 senior executives over Credit Suisse AT1 bond mis-selling allegations

Advertisement

Governance worries at HDFC Bank

HDFC Bank shares saw a sharp sell-off in March this year after its former part-time Chairman Atanu Chakraborty resigned, stating that some practices within the bank did not match his personal values and ethics. The stock lost 12% in three days after his resignation on March 18, leading to a massive share sell-off that wiped off around Rs 1.6 lakh crore from the bank’s market value in just three sessions. The private lender then took several measures to address concerns.

The shares of the private lender sharply recovered some of the losses after a strong Q1 business update, all of which, however, were wiped out after its actual quarterly results. The heavyweight stock hitting fresh record lows is dragging down major indices as well as mutual funds.

What lies ahead for HDFC Bank share price?

Recently, Jefferies’ Global Head of Equity Strategy and emerging markets bull Christopher Wood removed HDFC Bank along with PB Fintech’s PolicyBazaar from his India long-only model portfolio, replacing them with Multi Commodity Exchange of India (MCX) and Lenskart Solutions in a shift toward exchange infrastructure and retail.

Goldman Sachs initiated coverage on HDFC Bank with a ‘Buy’ call and a target price of Rs 861 apiece. Goldman Sachs noted the bank’s core-PPOP inflection driven by margins and operating leverage, along with attractive valuations. The brokerage initiated coverage at ‘Buy’ on compelling valuations, despite expecting further downside earnings revisions. Nomura and Motilal Oswal Financial Services also have ‘Buy’ calls on the shares of HDFC Bank.

Advertisement

Disclaimer: This article has been written by Debaroti Adhikary, who is not a SEBI-registered Research Analyst or an Investment Adviser. Debaroti Adhikary and his/her ‘relative(s)’ (as defined under Section 2(77) of the Companies Act, 2013) do not hold any financial interest in the companies mentioned in this article as of the date of publication. The views/recommendations mentioned in this article, wherever applicable, are those of the respective SEBI-registered Research Analyst/brokerage and have been reproduced/reported with due attribution. They should not be construed as the views or recommendations of The Economic Times Digital or the journalist. Readers are advised to consider the original research report and make their investment decisions based on their own assessment. Brokerage disclaimers here.

Continue Reading

Business

Destination XL Group, Inc. Q2 2027 Earnings Call Summary

Published

on

Destination XL Group, Inc. Q2 2027 Earnings Call Summary
Destination XL Group, Inc. Q2 2027 Earnings Call Summary
Destination XL Group, Inc. Q2 2027 Earnings Call Summary – Moby

Strategic Performance Drivers and Operational Context

Our analysts just identified a stock with the potential to be the next Nvidia. Tell us how you invest and we’ll show you why it’s our #1 pick. Tap here.

  • Management attributes the sequential improvement in comparable sales to enhanced digital conversion and the successful scaling of private brand franchises like THERMACHILL.

  • The company is navigating a structural shift in customer behavior driven by GLP-1 medication adoption, which has led to temporary pauses in apparel purchasing during weight loss journeys.

  • Performance was significantly bolstered by a $4.6 million IEEPA tariff refund, which masked a 70 basis point decline in underlying merchandise margins caused by higher markdowns and shipping surcharges.

  • Strategic focus has shifted toward ‘Fit Authority’ through the FITMAP initiative, which has scanned 150,000 customers and resulted in higher average order values and lower return rates.

  • Management identified store traffic as the primary headwind, noting that while conversion remains strong, overall foot traffic is pressured by shifting consumer spending priorities.

  • The newly created Chief Growth Officer role aims to integrate marketing, merchandising, and store experience to address the lag in new customer acquisition and reactivation.

Growth Initiatives and Capital Allocation Framework

  • The ‘Fit for Growth’ strategy will reallocate existing advertising budgets from bottom-of-funnel conversion toward mid- and upper-funnel tactics like YouTube and programmatic channels to improve brand awareness.

  • A multi-year store rationalization program is already underway with store closures occurring this year, though the impact on occupancy and store operating costs is expected to be more significant beginning in 2027., targeting high-occupancy locations in multi-store markets to improve sales per square foot and return on assets.

  • Management has paused all non-essential capital expenditures, prioritizing only critical technology upgrades and distribution center maintenance to preserve liquidity until sales trends stabilize.

  • Future marketing will utilize FITMAP data to create specific communication journeys for customers transitioning through weight loss, aiming to recapture them once they reach a stable size.

  • The company expects to leverage AI and answer engine optimization to maintain recent gains in sentiment scores and improve discoverability without significant infrastructure spend.

Strategic Pivot on Merger and Risk Factors

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

European stocks heading for worst week since April as ECB hike batters risk

Published

on


European stocks heading for worst week since April as ECB hike batters risk

Continue Reading

Business

LG Denies Smart TVs Secretly Record Conversations After Researchers Allege Standby Spying

Published

on

LG CEO AT CES 2025

SEOUL — LG Electronics said claims that its smart televisions record living-room conversations, even when the screen is dark, are “not true,” after a two-hour investigation alleged the sets can capture audio and map home networks.

The company issued the denial to Tom’s Hardware, CNET and Al Jazeera after Gamers Nexus, working with Level1Techs and independent researchers, published a 135-minute report on Monday. The video said testers pulled conversation transcripts from an LG set in standby, logged other devices on the same Wi-Fi network and sent data toward LG Ad Solutions. The report put the installed base at about 216 million smart TVs.

“The claims made in the recently published video are not true,” LG said. “LG TVs process voice data only when the voice button on the remote control is pressed and held, or when a wake word such as ‘Hi LG’ is recognized after the user has activated the Far-Field voice recognition feature. Other than these instances, the TVs do not collect or record ambient conversations.”

If the wake word is not recognized, the company said, “no voice data is transmitted to the server; the audio processing for wake word detection is performed locally on the device and is immediately deleted.” In a longer privacy note it added that sets “do not collect, record or transmit ambient conversations in your home, unless voice functionality has been intentionally activated by the user.” In standby, it said, the television “only monitors for the wake word if you have previously enabled the Far-Field feature.”

Advertisement

LG did not deny that its televisions scan the local network. “To provide smart TV functionalities, LG TVs feature the ability to scan for and connect to nearby devices on the same network,” the statement said. It called that “a standard function commonly provided by smart TVs and smart home devices.” On Automatic Content Recognition, which fingerprints what is playing on HDMI and other inputs for ads and recommendations, LG said the feature “is offered on an opt-in basis” and that without consent “ACR data is not used for advertising purposes.”

What the company did not address, several outlets noted, was the researchers’ claim that voice commands can sit in plaintext on servers and that a webOS flaw could let an attacker use the microphone even after a user flips a hardware mute. Gamers Nexus said a man-in-the-middle test on an OLED G5 produced live audio from a dark screen and again after the set was pulled off the internet. It also said the remote’s microphone can stay live when a switch on the set is off.

Smart-TV listening is not new. Wake-word systems from Amazon, Google and Apple keep a short audio buffer on the device. Content recognition is industry practice. What made this report travel is the combination of standby capture, network inventory and an advertising subsidiary that already faced a U.S. state case.

In May, LG Electronics USA settled a Texas lawsuit over ACR. Attorney General Ken Paxton said the company would obtain consent before collecting viewing data and add a pop-up that explains the practice and lets owners opt out. “LG has now taken important steps to ensure that users’ viewing data will not be collected without their informed consent,” Paxton said then. LG said it had worked with the state to strengthen an existing consent practice. Texas had sued LG and other brands in late 2025 over tracking without proper notice.

Advertisement

Owners who do not want a far-field mic can leave that setting off and avoid holding the remote’s voice key. That does not stop ACR if it was accepted at setup, and it does not stop the set from seeing a phone or speaker on the same router. Unplugging the Ethernet or cutting Wi-Fi stops cloud uploads. It does not, according to the researchers, silence a local microphone path.

LG is one of the largest TV brands in the United States and Europe. webOS sits on OLEDs that sell for more than $2,000 and on cheaper LCD sets. Advertising through LG Ad Solutions is part of how those boxes are priced. The company’s position is that voice is a button or a phrase the owner turned on, that network discovery is how Cast and AirPlay work, and that ads require a check box.

The investigators’ position is that a dark screen is not an off switch. LG’s statement draws a bright line at the wake word. It leaves the network scan on the table and leaves the plaintext and exploit claims unanswered. Until a regulator or a court tests those packets, owners have the company’s word, a Texas consent screen and a remote they can put in a drawer.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Cricut, Inc. (CRCT) Presents at Goldman Sachs Communacopia + Technology Conference 2026 Transcript

Published

on

OneWater Marine Inc. (ONEW) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript