Young boys and men appear to be over-represented in the stats. Of the casualties, 302 – the most of any age and sex category – were males aged 10-19.

Six deaths were recorded in 2024, unchanged from the previous year. Five of these were riders and one a pedestrian.

Although the numbers aren’t conclusive, it is thought more accidents are happening on privately owned e-scooters. Winchcomb says police statistics “aren’t reflective of the number of injuries”.

Nonetheless, campaigners believe there is enough evidence to show that regulation is urgently needed.

Carly Calland’s 14-year-old son Jacob died in March 2025 of a catastrophic head injury. He was a passenger on an e-scooter that was involved with a collision with a car.

If privately owned e-scooters are legalised for public use, Carly believes, there should be mandatory helmets, a ban on carrying passengers and penalties for parents that allow children to ride illegally.

“If Jacob was wearing a helmet that day, he would still be here,” Carly, from Wythenshawe in Greater Manchester, says.

Carly is not against e-scooters. They “are really good for people to get to work, and they are eco-friendly”, she tells me, but “they just need to be used in the correct way.”

What happens if the current situation goes on? Her answer is emphatic: “More deaths.”

This article was written by

Follow

Samsung Electronics has reshaped its premium smartphone strategy this year, pushing the “Ultra” branding to the top of both its foldable and traditional slab-style phone lines for the first time, a shift that has left shoppers weighing two very different devices with nearly identical internal hardware.

The comparison centers on the Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra, which succeeds last year’s Z Fold7 as Samsung’s flagship foldable, and the Galaxy S26 Ultra, the company’s traditional bar-style flagship. According to technology outlet Engadget, the two devices share the same processor, the same RAM and storage configurations, and the same battery capacity, yet deliver dramatically different real-world experiences depending on their form factor.

A reshuffled foldable lineup

This year’s release marks the first time Samsung has applied the “Ultra” designation to a foldable device. Alongside the Z Fold8 Ultra, Samsung introduced a new mid-tier model, the standard Galaxy Z Fold8, positioned with a shorter, wider “passport-style” design that sits below the Ultra in specifications while still offering more functionality than the company’s clamshell-style Z Flip8. That restructuring has clarified the roles within Samsung’s foldable range, splitting it into distinct Ultra, standard Fold and Flip tiers for the first time.

Reporting on the change, Engadget described the shift as revealing more than Samsung may have intended, noting that the differences between the Z Fold8 Ultra and S26 Ultra are “both vast and — paradoxically — surface-deep,” given how similar the two phones are under the hood.

Nearly identical core specifications

Both devices run on Qualcomm’s latest Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor and ship with matching memory configurations: 12GB of RAM paired with either 256GB or 512GB of storage, or 16GB of RAM on the top-tier 1TB storage option. Both phones also carry a 5,000mAh battery. That overlap in core hardware has led analysts to conclude that competition in the premium smartphone segment is shifting away from raw performance specifications and toward differences in form factor and user experience instead.

Where the two phones diverge

The most significant differences between the devices lie in their displays and physical designs. The Galaxy S26 Ultra retains a traditional smartphone shape and introduces a new Privacy Display feature, described as the first hardware-level implementation of its kind in a smartphone, capable of narrowing the screen’s visibility from off-center angles without relying on an added polarizing film layer. The Z Fold8 Ultra, by contrast, emphasizes its large foldable interior screen, offering a combined smartphone-and-tablet experience when opened.

Camera hardware also separates the two devices. The S26 Ultra includes a wider f/1.4 main aperture, which Samsung says allows the sensor to capture 47% more light than the Z Fold8 Ultra’s f/1.7 aperture, along with an exclusive 50-megapixel, 5x periscope telephoto lens not available on the foldable. Both phones share a 200-megapixel main sensor and a 50-megapixel ultrawide camera, but the S26 Ultra’s additional zoom lens and stronger front-facing camera have made it the preferred option among reviewers focused primarily on photography.

Charging speed favors the slab phone as well. The S26 Ultra supports 60W wired charging, compared with 45W on the Z Fold8 Ultra, giving the traditional flagship an edge in minimizing downtime between charges.

A meaningful price gap

The price difference between the two devices is substantial. The Galaxy S26 Ultra starts at $1,299.99, while the Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra starts at approximately $1,999, a gap of roughly $700. According to one detailed comparison, that premium buys a second 6.5-inch cover display capable of functioning as a standalone phone, an 8-inch interior tablet-style display, hands-free video call functionality through a half-fold “Flex Mode,” support for three simultaneous apps in split-screen view, and access to Samsung DeX on the larger interior screen rather than the more cramped 6.9-inch portrait display used for DeX on the S26 Ultra.

Physical dimensions and durability trade-offs

Hands-on comparisons have highlighted meaningful physical differences among Samsung’s three new devices. The Z Fold8 Ultra measures 158.4mm tall when unfolded, matching the exact height of the Galaxy S26+, while its narrower 72.8mm body and 8.9mm thickness make it the sleeker of Samsung’s two foldable options compared with the wider, shorter standard Z Fold8, which measures 81.9mm wide and 9.7mm thick. The Z Fold8 Ultra weighs 215g, just a gram heavier than the S26 Ultra, while the standard Z Fold8 weighs 201g.

Despite steady industry-wide improvements to basic foldable durability features such as water and dust resistance, engineering trade-offs in weight, thickness and long-term durability remain an inherent part of the foldable form factor, according to Engadget’s analysis, distinguishing both Fold models from the more conventional build of the S26 Ultra.

Different phones for different priorities

Engadget summarized the comparison by describing the Galaxy S26 Ultra as “a more balanced device for most users,” while characterizing the Z Fold8 Ultra as “a specialised product that offers the experience of putting a tablet screen in your pocket.” That framing reflects a broader theme running through most detailed comparisons of the two devices: rather than one model clearly outperforming the other, each is built around a different set of priorities, camera performance, charging speed and one-handed convenience on the S26 Ultra, versus multitasking, screen real estate and tablet-like functionality on the Z Fold8 Ultra.

What it means for Samsung’s strategy

The overlapping specifications combined with sharply different display technologies and use cases suggest a broader shift in how Samsung is positioning its flagship lineup. Rather than competing primarily on raw performance, where the S26 Ultra and Z Fold8 Ultra are now functionally equivalent, Samsung appears to be betting that consumers will increasingly choose between devices based on form factor and specialized features, whether that means a privacy-focused display and best-in-class camera system, or a foldable screen capable of replacing both a phone and a tablet in a single device.

With both phones now available, the decision for shoppers weighing Samsung’s two top-tier devices increasingly comes down to a straightforward question: whether they value the flexibility of a folding tablet-sized screen enough to pay a roughly $700 premium and accept a heavier, thicker device, or whether they’d rather have Samsung’s most refined and camera-capable slab phone at a lower price point.

Google parent Alphabet saw its business continue to grow in recent months, yet growing spending on artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure put its leftover cash into negative territory.

The company’s free cash flow, the cash it maintained after paying for operations and investments, came in at negative $5.9bn (£4.3bn) for the first time in at least a decade, according to its past financial records.

Alphabet’s spending on AI is now expected to hit as much as $205bn this year, an increase from $190bn, as major tech companies race to build around a new wave of the technology.

Meanwhile, Alphabet’s combined quarterly revenue hit $119.8bn, up 23% compared with the same time last year.

But the company’s stock fell 4% in after hours trading.

Anat Ashkanazi, Google’s chief financial officer, noted on a call with financial analysts that the company had shown negative free cash flow due to growing capital expenditures, essentially all of which was related to AI spending.

She said the company spent $45bn in the second quarter, with 60% of the cost going towards servers and the remaining 40% going towards data centres.

Alphabet’s capital spending was $36bn in the first quarter of this year.

Ashkanazi said on the call that when it comes to AI, “the demand still outpaces that investment”.

“As long as we see these attractive opportunities to invest, we will continue to invest.”

Sundar Pichai, Google’s chief executive, said that the technological shift to AI tools and capabilities still “feels like early innings in a shift across multiple areas” and that the company’s plans around generating financial returns on its spending were “disciplined”.

“What I see with what you can do with frontier capabilities, there is still a lot of work left to do to translate that into experiences for our users. So that looks like extraordinary opportunities with extraordinary returns.”

Tesla, the electric vehicle company controlled by Elon Musk, also reported negative free cash flow on Wednesday of $1.1bn for the second quarter due to its own increasing investment costs.

It was the company’s first negative showing of leftover cash in two years, according to its financial records.

Vaibhav Taneja, Tesla’s chief financial officer, said during a call with analysts that the company will spend as much as $25bn this year, more than double its capital spending in 2025.

He added that Tesla was in “a big investment cycle” and that its spending would probably increase further over the next three years.

Tesla’s stock also dropped by 4% in after hours trading.

Most members of President Donald Trump‘s Cabinet are expected to launch official TikTok accounts Tuesday, a White House official confirmed to Fox News.

The coordinated rollout, first reported by Axios, follows a July 16 opinion from the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel concluding that federal employees may use TikTok because the app is now operated by a U.S.-approved owner that falls outside the federal ban.

The DOJ opinion concluded that the version of TikTok operated by the TikTok U.S. Data Security Joint Venture is not prohibited under the No TikTok on Government Devices Act, a 2022 law that barred TikTok from federal government devices because of national security concerns tied to Chinese parent company ByteDance.

The opinion says the law prohibits versions of TikTok “developed or provided by entities in which ByteDance Limited has a controlling ownership stake.”

TIKTOK AVOIDS US BAN BY FINALIZING HISTORIC TRUMP-BACKED AMERICAN MAJORITY OWNERSHIP DEAL

President Donald Trump speaks during a Cabinet meeting at the White House. Most members of his Cabinet are expected to launch official TikTok accounts Tuesday after a Justice Department opinion allowing federal employees to use the app. (Win McNamee/Getty Images / Getty Images)

According to the DOJ, the current version of TikTok no longer meets that definition because the joint venture “functions independently of ByteDance, is majority-owned by American investors and has revised the content recommendation algorithm and cybersecurity program originally developed by ByteDance to insulate federal government information against the concerning security features that initially motivated the prohibition.”

The decision marked a significant shift in the federal government’s posture toward TikTok after years of bipartisan concerns over the app’s ties to China and data security risks.

Trump has increasingly embraced TikTok, arguing the platform helped him connect with younger voters during the 2024 campaign.

“You know, I watched a couple of people critical of the fact that TikTok, TikTok, it’s so bad. It’s so dangerous. It’s horrible. They’re spreading all these rumors,” Trump said July 8.

“And the numbers came out yesterday. You know who’s No. 1 on TikTok? I am. I’m No. 1 at TikTok.”

TRUMP, BONDI SUED OVER TIKTOK DEAL THAT ALLEGEDLY ‘SUBVERTED’ CONGRESSIONAL AUTHORITY AND VIOLATED FEDERAL LAW

The opinion says the law prohibits versions of TikTok “developed or provided by entities in which ByteDance Limited has a controlling ownership stake.” (iStock / iStock)

Trump also dismissed criticism from some China hawks, saying his messaging on the platform undercuts concerns about Chinese influence.

“And all I talk about is how bad communism is, right?” Trump said. “They say, ‘Oh, it’s terrible.’ They’re spreading. But I’m No. 1. I listen to Gordon Chang. I like Gordon Chang, but he’s always, like, negative.

“Oh, China is so terrible. They’re so terrible, and TikTok is so terrible. But I am No. 1 on TikTok. I have, like 4 billion views or something like that.”

Trump’s Cabinet is expected to launch official TikTok accounts Tuesday after the Justice Department concluded federal employees may use the app under its new ownership structure. (Win McNamee/Getty Images / Getty Images)

Earlier this month, Trump also credited TikTok with helping deliver his election victory.

CLICK HERE TO GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO

“We have to be careful because China is a great competitor,” Trump said during a July 6 event. “But, you know, he was talking about we must stop TikTok. I’m No. 1 on TikTok. I think it helped me win the election in a landslide if you want to know the truth.”

Fox News’ Patrick Ward contributed to this report.