Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Business

F&O Talk | Sudeep Shah on why cash market trades better versus derivatives, for now. Strategy on HEG, IDBI, 4 more stocks

Published

on

F&O Talk | Sudeep Shah on why cash market trades better versus derivatives, for now. Strategy on HEG, IDBI, 4 more stocks
India’s heartbeat indices ended their two-session rally on Friday as a failure in the Iran-US negotiations even after one month, dampened the market mood. Elevated energy prices and a plunging rupee aggravated troubles for domestic investors. Markets were dragged mainly by financials, auto and consumer stocks amid high volatility. Nifty settled at 22,819.60, falling by 486.85 points or 2.09% while the BSE Sensex closed at 73,583.22, declining 1,690.23 points or 2.25%.

With just one more session to go in March, Nifty so far has plunged over 9% this month

Fear index India VIX settled at 26.80 on the NSE in the last session, up by 8.77%.

Analyst Sudeep Shah, Vice President and Head of Technical & Derivatives Research at SBI Securities, interacted with ETMarkets regarding the outlook for the Nifty and Bank Nifty, as well as an index strategy for the upcoming week. The following are the edited excerpts from his chat:

Advertisement

Q: The Israel-Iran war flipped the overall script in March which is seasonally a strong month as Nifty is down nearly 9%. Based on the F&O rollover data, what is your expectation for April?

Since the onset of the US–Iran war–led sell-off, one recurring pattern has consistently emerged in the markets. Short-lived pullbacks lasting 2–3 trading sessions have repeatedly been followed by sharp gap-down openings. Each of these brief rebounds has lured traders into a false sense of recovery, triggering FOMO-driven participation under the assumption that the worst is over. However, these pullbacks have consistently failed to sustain, and the optimism has quickly given way to fresh rounds of aggressive selling, often materializing as large gap-downs over the subsequent 2–3 trading sessions, making one question whether the next bounce is an opportunity or just another trap waiting to unfold.
This repetitive cycle of hope followed by sudden downside shocks is not only increasing volatility but is also leading to significant wealth erosion, particularly for short-term traders and leveraged positions. The inability of the market to build on pullbacks highlights the fragile sentiment and reinforces the need for caution, discipline, and risk management in the current environment because when conviction is missing, even small triggers can lead to disproportionately large reactions.
Month-to-date, the benchmark index Nifty has declined by over 9%, marking its steepest monthly fall since the Covid 19–induced market collapse. At the same time, disruptions in global gas supply are creating a diverse set of challenges across multiple industries, particularly those dependent on energy-intensive operations. These supply constraints have led to rising cost pressures, uncertainty around margins, and delayed investment decisions. Collectively, these factors are dampening hopes of an earnings revival and eroding overall market confidence, further weighing on investor sentiment and risk appetite—raising a deeper concern about whether the worst of the earnings downgrades is still ahead.
From a technical perspective, there has been no change since last week. The index continues to trade below its key moving averages, while momentum indicators remain firmly in bearish territory, indicating that downside pressure persists. Interestingly, the Nifty Midcap 100 and Nifty Smallcap 100 indices are displaying relative outperformance compared to the frontline indices. However, given the prevailing volatility and fragile sentiment, price action in the mid and smallcap space over the next 2–3 weeks to assess the sustainability of this relative strength because history suggests that leadership often shifts just when confidence starts to build.

Talking about crucial levels, the 22,650–22,600 zone is expected to act as an important support area for Nifty. A sustained break below 22600 could open the door for further downside, potentially dragging the index towards 22,400, followed by 22,200 in the short term. On the upside, the 23150–23200 region is likely to remain a critical resistance zone.

Advertisement

Q: Banks have been bleeding primarily because of FII outflows. Can you spot trading opportunities in Bank Nifty (or bank stocks) or at least suggest traders ways to cut their losses if more selling continues?

The banking benchmark index Bank Nifty has significantly underperformed the frontline indices during March. Month to date, the index is down by over 13% and has formed a sizeable bearish candle, highlighting strong selling pressure at higher levels. The ratio chart of the index as compared to Nifty is marking the sequence of lower tops and lower bottoms.

The weakness is further evident from the fact that the index is currently trading nearly 8% below its 200-day EMA and around 9% below its 100-day EMA, underscoring the loss of medium- to long-term trend support. From a momentum standpoint, the daily RSI has entered a super bearish zone as per RSI range shift rules, while the weekly RSI remains in bearish territory and continues to decline, indicating sustained downside momentum across timeframes.

Given the current price structure and negative momentum setup, the index is likely to extend its southward trajectory in the short term. In terms of key levels, the 51,700–51,800 zone is expected to act as an immediate support area. A sustained breakdown below 51,800 could result in further correction towards 51000, followed by 50,400 in the near term.

On the upside, any recovery attempt is likely to face strong resistance in the 53400–53500 zone, which will act as a major hurdle and supply area for the index.

Advertisement

Q: There is a bloodbath across situation and with Iran-Israel war uncertainty, it is very difficult to take an informed call. In such a situation, are you seeing themes/pockets of opportunities for investors?

The Nifty CPSE index is displaying relative outperformance compared to the broader and frontline indices. While the index has not shown strong bullish momentum, it is currently moving in a consolidation phase, even as the broader market undergoes a corrective decline. This relative resilience suggests better stability and selective accumulation, positioning Nifty CPSE as a comparatively stronger pocket amid an otherwise weak market environment.

Q: Unlike 2025, investors had a refuge in gold and silver and were putting money there. That situation has changed dramatically as we see bullion prices falling sharply. What will be your advice to investors whether to remain invested or preserve cash?


Market’s lackluster performance can be attributed to Nifty Bank, which has delivered its third worst performance in March in the past 20 years, declining by nearly 11%. What do bank Nifty charts suggest and how to trade?

Yes, the market’s lackluster performance has largely been driven by Bank Nifty, which has corrected by nearly 13%. This sharp underperformance has exerted significant pressure on the broader indices and weakened overall market sentiment.

Advertisement

Chart patterns of Bank Nifty continue to reflect a weak and bearish structure, indicating limited scope for a sustainable recovery in the near term. Given the prevailing trend and momentum setup, we recommend adopting a “sell on rise” strategy, as any short-term pullbacks are likely to remain corrective and may attract fresh selling pressure.

Q: For risk-takers, volatility brings opportunities for making money. Will you prefer cash markets or F&O?


Volatility is a double-edged sword. It creates opportunity, but also amplifies risk. For a risk-taker, the goal isn’t just to chase swings, but to manage them effectively. In volatile markets, moves are sharp and fast. If you’re right, profits can come quickly; if you’re wrong, losses can escalate just as rapidly. This is where the choice between cash and F&O becomes crucial.

F&O is a leveraged product, so volatility acts as a multiplier. If a trade goes against you, it becomes a double whammy. Price movement and leverage work against your capital. Even the right view can go wrong due to timing or sudden reversals. In contrast, cash markets offer better control. With proper position sizing and risk management, you can use volatility to your advantage without the pressure of leverage.

Advertisement

In such phases, it’s wiser to focus on survival first, because volatility rewards discipline, but punishes over-leverage.

Q: HEG, Emcure and Triveni Engineering were among top gainers this week, while Firstcry, IDBI Bank and Lodha have been big losers. What should investors do with them?


HEG had briefly slipped below its previous swing low of 491 on the daily chart but quickly reclaimed those levels, followed by an impressive rebound supported by a sharp rise in volumes. The DI+ crossing above DI- on the ADX indicator suggests that buyers are gaining control over sellers. As long as the stock holds above the 520–515 zone, the pullback is likely to extend further.

Emcure has witnessed a horizontal trendline breakout on the daily chart. The RSI is trending higher and sustaining above 60, indicating strong bullish momentum. Additionally, the DI+ crossover reinforces the dominance of buyers. The uptrend is likely to continue as long as the stock trades above 1580.

Advertisement

Triveni Engineering has staged a strong rebound from its key support zone of 335–325. The MACD has crossed above the signal line, indicating improving momentum. However, the stock faces stiff resistance around 418–420. A decisive breakout above this zone could lead to an extension of the pullback.

FirstCry has been consolidating in the 252–207 range since 19th February. The RSI failed to cross the 60 mark and has drifted lower, suggesting weakening momentum. The MACD remains below both the signal and zero line, indicating a bearish bias. The stock is likely to remain under pressure as long as it trades below 250.

Both IDBI Bank and Lodha are trading significantly below their key short- and long-term moving averages. A rising ADX indicates a strengthening bearish trend, while the RSI hovering around 20 reflects strong downside momentum. 72 for IDBI Bank and 760 for Lodha act as immediate resistance levels, and as long as the stocks trade below these levels, the trend is likely to remain bearish.

(Disclaimer: The recommendations, suggestions, views, and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times.)

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Business

Which Retail Giant Is the Better Buy for Investors Now

Published

on

Costco

NEW YORK — As the retail sector navigates shifting consumer habits, rising e-commerce competition and persistent economic uncertainty in 2026, investors are closely comparing Walmart Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corp. to determine which stock offers the stronger long-term opportunity. Both companies have delivered solid performance this year, but their business models, growth trajectories and valuations present distinct profiles that could influence portfolio decisions for the remainder of the year and beyond.

Walmart shares have risen approximately 18% year-to-date, supported by strong e-commerce momentum, advertising revenue growth and resilient grocery sales. Costco, meanwhile, has advanced about 22%, driven by record membership renewals, robust same-store sales and international expansion. With both trading near all-time highs, the question of which represents the better buy in 2026 depends on an investor’s time horizon, risk tolerance and preference for growth versus stability.

Walmart, the world’s largest retailer by revenue, reported fiscal first-quarter 2026 results that beat expectations, with revenue climbing to $165.6 billion and e-commerce sales jumping 22%. The company’s Walmart+ membership program continues to gain subscribers, while its advertising business and private-label brands provide high-margin revenue streams. International operations, particularly in Mexico and India, are showing double-digit growth, and the company’s supply chain investments have improved efficiency and reduced costs.

Analysts at firms like TD Cowen and Bernstein have named Walmart a top retail pick for 2026, citing its ability to serve value-conscious consumers while capturing premium and digital spending. The stock trades at a forward price-to-earnings multiple in the mid-20s, which many view as reasonable given projected mid-single-digit revenue growth and expanding margins. Walmart also offers a modest dividend yield around 1.1%, supported by consistent increases and a healthy payout ratio.

Advertisement

Costco, by contrast, operates a membership-only warehouse model that generates high customer loyalty and predictable recurring revenue. The company reported strong first-quarter results, with revenue rising 8% and same-store sales growing 6%. Membership fees, which now account for nearly 80% of operating income, continue to rise steadily as renewal rates hover above 90%. Costco’s private-label Kirkland Signature products remain extremely popular, and international expansion into new markets is adding meaningful growth.

The stock carries a higher valuation, trading at a forward P/E in the low-to-mid 30s, reflecting investor confidence in the durability of its model. Analysts highlight Costco’s pricing power, efficient operations and ability to weather economic downturns better than traditional retailers. However, the company’s slower growth rate compared with Walmart’s e-commerce and advertising expansion has led some to view it as more defensive than dynamic.

Key Differences in Business Models

Walmart’s massive scale — more than 10,000 stores worldwide and a dominant online presence — gives it unmatched reach and data advantages. The company has successfully integrated its physical and digital operations, using stores as fulfillment centers for rapid delivery. This omnichannel strategy has helped Walmart capture market share from pure e-commerce players while maintaining its core low-price positioning.

Costco’s model is more focused and selective. With roughly 900 warehouses globally, the company emphasizes bulk purchasing, limited product selection and high inventory turnover. This approach results in strong margins and customer loyalty but limits the total addressable market compared with Walmart’s broader retail footprint. Costco’s reliance on membership fees provides stability but also means revenue growth is more predictable and less explosive than Walmart’s diversified streams.

Advertisement

Valuation and Risk Profiles

Walmart offers a more balanced risk-reward profile in 2026. Its exposure to grocery and everyday essentials provides defensive qualities during economic slowdowns, while e-commerce and advertising provide growth levers. The company’s international presence and investments in automation and AI-driven inventory management position it well for long-term efficiency gains.

Costco’s higher valuation reflects its superior margins and customer retention, but it leaves less room for error if membership growth slows or competition intensifies. The company’s slower pace of new warehouse openings compared with Walmart’s store expansion could limit near-term upside if consumer spending moderates.

Both stocks face common risks, including inflation, labor costs, supply chain disruptions and intensifying competition from Amazon and discount retailers. Regulatory scrutiny on pricing practices and labor practices also remains a background concern for both.

Analyst Consensus and Investor Considerations

Wall Street remains generally bullish on both companies, but Walmart receives more “Buy” ratings due to its growth potential and reasonable valuation. Costco is often recommended for more conservative portfolios seeking stability and consistent returns. For growth-oriented investors, Walmart’s e-commerce momentum and advertising expansion make it the more dynamic choice. For income-focused investors, both offer reliable dividends, but Walmart’s higher yield and faster earnings growth provide a slight edge.

Advertisement

Investors should consider their time horizon and portfolio allocation. Walmart may appeal to those seeking a blend of growth and income with broader exposure to retail trends. Costco suits those who prefer a high-quality, predictable business with strong customer loyalty and margin stability.

Long-Term Outlook for Both Retail Giants

Looking further into 2026 and beyond, both companies are well-positioned to benefit from several powerful trends: continued digitization of retail, growth in private-label products and increasing demand for value and convenience. Walmart’s scale and technological investments give it an edge in adapting to changing consumer behavior, while Costco’s membership model ensures a loyal customer base that is less price-sensitive.

Analysts project both companies will deliver solid mid-single-digit revenue growth with expanding margins over the next several years. Walmart’s international expansion and e-commerce investments could drive faster top-line growth, while Costco’s focus on operational excellence and customer experience supports steady, high-quality earnings.

For investors deciding between the two in 2026, the choice ultimately comes down to investment objectives. Walmart offers greater growth potential and diversification, making it the better buy for those seeking capital appreciation alongside income. Costco provides exceptional stability and customer loyalty, appealing to conservative investors prioritizing consistency and downside protection.

Advertisement

Both retail giants have proven their ability to adapt and thrive in challenging environments. As the retail landscape continues to evolve, Walmart and Costco remain two of the most reliable ways to participate in the sector’s long-term growth. For patient investors with a multi-year horizon, Walmart currently edges out as the more compelling opportunity in 2026 due to its faster growth trajectory and more attractive valuation relative to expected earnings expansion.

Continue Reading

Business

Haggling prices and chasing debts – tradespeople hit with cost of living headache

Published

on

Haggling prices and chasing debts - tradespeople hit with cost of living headache

More than half of tradespeople have seen an increase of late payments compared to a year ago, a survey finds.

Continue Reading

Business

What is the consumer sentiment on AI?

Published

on


What is the consumer sentiment on AI?

Continue Reading

Business

Relatives of Mexico’s disappeared hold Mother’s Day protest ahead of World Cup

Published

on

Relatives of Mexico’s disappeared hold Mother’s Day protest ahead of World Cup


Relatives of Mexico’s disappeared hold Mother’s Day protest ahead of World Cup

Continue Reading

Business

TOTVS S.A. (TTVSY) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Published

on

OneWater Marine Inc. (ONEW) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

TOTVS S.A. (TTVSY) Q1 2026 Earnings Call May 7, 2026 10:00 AM EDT

Company Participants

Sérgio Serio – Investor Relations Head
Dennis Herszkowicz – CEO & Member of Board of Executive Officers
Gilsomar Sebastião – CFO, VP of Admin & Financial, Investor Relations Director and Member of Board of Executive Officers
Vivian Broge – VP, Chief Human Relations & Marketing Officer and Member of Board of Executive Officers

Advertisement

Conference Call Participants

Felipe Cheng – Santander Investment Securities Inc., Research Division
Livea Mizobata – JPMorgan Chase & Co, Research Division
Maria Infantozzi – Itaú Corretora de Valores S.A., Research Division
Silvio Doria – J. Safra Corretora de Valores e Cambio Ltda, Research Division
Luis Chagas – XP Investimentos Corretora de Câmbio, Títulos e Valores Mobiliários S.A., Research Division
Lucca Brendim – BofA Securities, Research Division

Presentation

Advertisement

Sérgio Serio
Investor Relations Head

[Interpreted] Good morning. Welcome to the earnings video conference on first quarter 2026. I’m Sérgio Serio. And here with me, we have our CEO, Maia, CFO, to present our quarter highlights. And by the end, we’ll have a Q&A session.

Before starting, it’s important to remind that forecast on TOTVS performance are based on current assumptions. There are risks and uncertainties, and many factors can change the company’s results that may differ from the expectations presented here.

Now I give the floor for Dennis on the Slide 3 that will start the presentation.

Advertisement

Dennis Herszkowicz
CEO & Member of Board of Executive Officers

Okay. Thank you, Sérgio. Good morning, everyone. Well, TOTVS’s performance on this quarter as in the previous one and during the full year of 2025 reinforce a practical contradiction when we have an imbalance between expectations and reality.

Since February 2, our future has been fitted in the same being of the software market. With [indiscernible] with the ongoing records on new sales, revenue, EBITDA and basically any other financial

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Whale’s Insight: Will Strategy Sell Bitcoin? Q1 2026 Earnings Highlights

Published

on

Whale's Insight: Will Strategy Sell Bitcoin? Q1 2026 Earnings Highlights

Chipset on circuit board for semiconductor investment, 3d rendering

nespix/iStock via Getty Images

Strategy (MSTR) just broke its “never sell” pledge after a $12.54B Q1 loss, while Q1 AI earnings produced one repeatable formula: rigid supply, inelastic demand, +500% returns. April delivered $2B in net Bitcoin ETF inflows, the strongest month of 2026, and May opened with four straight

Continue Reading

Business

Jailed Iranian peace laureate Mohammadi moved to hospital in Tehran

Published

on

Jailed Iranian peace laureate Mohammadi moved to hospital in Tehran


Jailed Iranian peace laureate Mohammadi moved to hospital in Tehran

Continue Reading

Business

Installed Building Products, Inc. (IBP) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Published

on

OneWater Marine Inc. (ONEW) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Q1: 2026-05-07 Earnings Summary

EPS of $1.79 misses by $0.17

 | Revenue of $660.50M (-3.55% Y/Y) misses by $8.43M

Installed Building Products, Inc. (IBP) Q1 2026 Earnings Call May 7, 2026 10:00 AM EDT

Company Participants

Ryan Ricketts – Director of Investor Relations & Financial Planning
Jeffrey Edwards – Chairman, CEO & President
Michael Miller – CFO, Executive VP of Finance & Director

Advertisement

Conference Call Participants

Sam Reid
Stephen Kim – Evercore ISI Institutional Equities, Research Division
Michael Rehaut – JPMorgan Chase & Co, Research Division
Susan Maklari – Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., Research Division
Philip Ng – Jefferies LLC, Research Division
Michael Dahl – RBC Capital Markets, Research Division
Trey Grooms – Stephens Inc., Research Division
Adam Baumgarten
Kenneth Zener – Seaport Research Partners
Collin Verron

Advertisement

Presentation

Operator

Greetings, and welcome to the Installed Building Products First Quarter 2026 Financial Results Conference [Operator Instructions]. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded.

I would now like to turn the conference over to your host, Ryan Ricketts, Director of Investor Relations and Financial Planning and Analysis. You may begin.

Advertisement

Ryan Ricketts
Director of Investor Relations & Financial Planning

Good morning, and welcome to Installed Building Products First Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. Earlier today, we issued a press release on our financial results for the 2026 first quarter, which can be found in the Investor Relations section of our website. On today’s call, management’s prepared remarks and answers to your questions may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws. These forward-looking statements are based on management’s current beliefs and expectations and are subject to factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described today.

Please refer to our SEC filings for cautionary statements and risk factors. We undertake no duty or obligation to update any forward-looking statement as a result of new information or future events, except as required by federal securities laws. In addition, management refers to certain non-GAAP and adjusted financial measures on this

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Putin Declares Ukraine Conflict ‘Coming to an End’ as Fighting Rages On

Published

on

Donald Trump left the G7 summit early, saying he had to deal with the crisis in the Middle East

MOSCOW — Russian President Vladimir Putin declared Thursday that the war in Ukraine is “coming to an end,” offering his most optimistic public assessment of the three-year conflict even as fierce fighting continues along the front lines and Western officials expressed deep skepticism about any imminent resolution.

Speaking during a televised meeting with regional governors, Putin said Russian forces had achieved most of their military objectives and that negotiations could begin if Kyiv meets Moscow’s conditions. “The conflict is coming to an end,” Putin stated. “We are seeing positive dynamics on the battlefield, and I believe we are close to achieving our goals.”

The remarks, delivered with confidence, quickly drew global attention and mixed reactions. Ukrainian officials dismissed them as propaganda, while some European leaders called for caution. U.S. officials under President Donald Trump have signaled openness to negotiations but emphasized that any deal must be acceptable to Ukraine.

Despite Putin’s statement, intense combat persisted Thursday. Russian forces continued incremental advances in Donetsk Oblast, particularly around Pokrovsk, while Ukrainian troops launched drone strikes deep into Russian territory, targeting airfields and logistics hubs. Independent estimates suggest daily casualties on both sides remain high, with no immediate signs of de-escalation on the ground.

Advertisement

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy responded swiftly, stating that any peace must include full Russian withdrawal from occupied territories and robust security guarantees. “Russia talks about peace while continuing to bomb our cities and kill our people,” Zelenskyy said in a video address. “Real peace requires actions, not just words.”

Background and Context of the Conflict

Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, initially aiming for a rapid victory. After suffering major setbacks, including the failed assault on Kyiv and retreats from Kharkiv and Kherson, Russian strategy shifted to a grinding war of attrition focused on eastern Ukraine. The conflict has caused hundreds of thousands of military casualties, displaced millions and devastated Ukrainian infrastructure.

Western nations have provided more than $300 billion in aid to Ukraine, while Russia has relied on alliances with North Korea, Iran and domestic production to sustain its campaign. Multiple rounds of peace talks have failed, with both sides maintaining maximalist positions.

Putin’s latest comments echo previous claims of progress but come at a time when Russian forces have made their most consistent territorial gains in over a year. Ukrainian forces are struggling with manpower shortages, fatigue and reduced Western military support, while Russian missile and drone attacks on energy infrastructure have left millions of Ukrainians without reliable power.

Advertisement

International Reactions

The United States, under President Donald Trump, has indicated willingness to facilitate negotiations. Trump has repeatedly said he could end the war quickly, though specific proposals remain unclear. European leaders have expressed caution, warning that any agreement must respect Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.

NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte reaffirmed the alliance’s commitment to supporting Ukraine “for as long as it takes.” China, a close partner of Russia, welcomed Putin’s comments and called for a “political solution.” Analysts note that Putin’s statement may be timed to influence upcoming diplomatic discussions and to project strength ahead of Russia’s Victory Day celebrations.

Military Situation on the Ground

Russian forces continue slow but steady advances in Donetsk Oblast, with heavy fighting around Pokrovsk, Chasiv Yar and Vuhledar. Ukrainian forces have conducted successful long-range drone strikes on Russian oil refineries and military airfields, disrupting logistics and air operations.

Both sides are suffering significant losses. Independent estimates place combined daily casualties above 1,000. Spring weather has improved conditions for mechanized maneuvers, raising fears of renewed large-scale offensives in the coming weeks.

Advertisement

The humanitarian situation in Ukraine remains dire, with widespread power outages, destroyed infrastructure and millions displaced. International aid organizations continue to call for increased support and protection for civilians.

Economic Impact on Russia

Despite extensive Western sanctions, Russia’s economy has shown surprising resilience, supported by redirected oil sales, wartime industrial mobilization and alliances with non-Western nations. However, long-term challenges persist, including labor shortages, technological isolation and inflation pressures.

Putin’s government has heavily invested in the defense sector, which now accounts for a significant portion of GDP. This militarization has boosted short-term growth but raises concerns about economic sustainability once the conflict ends.

Path Toward Possible Negotiations

Any potential peace agreement would require complex compromises. Russia has demanded recognition of its territorial gains, Ukrainian neutrality and the lifting of sanctions. Ukraine insists on full withdrawal to 1991 borders, strong security guarantees and reparations.

Advertisement

Western diplomats say serious negotiations are unlikely without significant battlefield shifts or major political changes in either country. For now, both sides appear prepared to continue fighting while keeping diplomatic channels open.

Global Security Implications

The Ukraine conflict has reshaped European security, strengthened NATO and accelerated energy transitions away from Russian supplies. A resolution — whether through victory, defeat or negotiated settlement — would have profound implications for global stability, nuclear deterrence and the rules-based international order.

As Putin claims the war is nearing its end, the reality on the battlefield suggests a long and difficult road ahead. For the people of Ukraine, every statement from Moscow is measured against the continued suffering and destruction they endure daily.

The coming weeks and months will be critical in determining whether Putin’s words signal genuine openness to peace or represent another tactical maneuver in a war that has already claimed hundreds of thousands of lives and redrawn the map of Europe.

Advertisement

For now, the fighting continues, diplomacy remains stalled, and the world watches to see if 2026 will finally bring an end to Europe’s largest conflict since World War II.

Continue Reading

Business

AOC-backed $25 minimum wage could hit small businesses and red states

Published

on

AOC-backed $25 minimum wage could hit small businesses and red states

A proposal backed by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez to raise the federal minimum wage to $25 an hour is drawing warnings from economists, who say the plan could squeeze small businesses and hit red states hardest.

Because many red states remain near the $7.25 federal floor, the move would more than triple wages in those regions — a jump economists say could be harder for small businesses to absorb, raising the risk of higher prices, reduced hiring and broader economic strain.

Advertisement

“That’s one of the common fallacies people fall into. Many believe raising the minimum wage will solve everything, that wages will go up while prices stay the same,” Santiago Vidal Calvo, a policy analyst at the Manhattan Institute, told Fox News Digital. “But that’s Econ 101, it doesn’t work that way.”

AOC-BACKED $25 MINIMUM WAGE PLAN SOUNDS GREAT — BUT AT WHAT COST?

NY Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez listens to a question during a news conference.

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., has called for raising the federal minimum wage to address affordability concerns. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call/Getty Images / Getty Images)

He warned the proposal could disproportionately impact younger and low-income workers as businesses move to offset higher labor costs by cutting hours, reducing jobs or turning to automation.

Rebekah Paxton, research director at the Employment Policies Institute, said opposition to steep wage hikes is widespread among economists.

Advertisement

“We surveyed more than 160 American economists and found that 96% opposed proposals above $20 an hour,” Paxton told Fox News Digital, adding that concerns are especially pronounced in thin-margin industries like hospitality and restaurants, where higher labor costs could lead to job losses and make it harder for businesses to operate.

ONE LITTLE-KNOWN MEETING HELPS DECIDE WHAT AMERICANS CAN AFFORD — AND WHAT THEY CAN’T

Nicole Huyer, a senior research associate at the Thomas A. Roe Institute for Economic Policy Studies, said those pressures could force businesses to make tough decisions.

“Small businesses will look to cut costs by any means necessary,” Huyer said. “That includes raising prices, laying off workers, cutting hours or relocating altogether.”

Advertisement

The federal minimum wage has remained at $7.25 an hour since 2009, even as some states have pushed base pay above $15 — widening the gap between higher- and lower-wage economies.

States like California and New York now mandate minimum wages above $16 an hour, while others, including Texas and North Dakota, remain at the federal baseline. Economists also warn higher labor costs could accelerate automation in industries like retail and fast food, where margins are thin and entry-level jobs are common.

CLICK HERE TO GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO

A restaurant worker is seen moving tables on a patio ahead of dinner service.

Experts warn that hiking the federal minimum wage to $20 an hour will hurt small businesses. (Jeffrey Greenberg/Universal Images Group/Getty Images / Getty Images)

Small business owners in lower-wage states may be particularly vulnerable, as they often operate with tighter margins and less ability to absorb sudden cost increases than firms in higher-cost regions.

Advertisement

As proposals to raise the federal minimum wage gain traction, the debate is likely to intensify over whether a single national standard can account for wide differences in state economies, or whether wage policy is better left to the states.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025