Connect with us

Business

From Endeavour Mining to Mansa Resources, a Builder Returns to the Frontier

Published

on

From Endeavour Mining to Mansa Resources, a Builder Returns to the Frontier

When Sébastien de Montessus was appointed chief executive of Mansa Resources, a newly launched mining company backed by succesfull West African entrepreneur, Idrissa Nassa (Coris Bank), the move carried a familiar logic.

After nearly a decade spent transforming Endeavour Mining into one of the world’s ten largest gold producers, de Montessus is returning to what has long defined his career: building scale, discipline and credibility in frontier markets where volatility is the rule rather than the exception.

His nomination at Mansa marks the opening of a new chapter, but it is one deeply anchored in the managerial philosophy and operating model he refined during his years at Endeavour. For investors and industry observers, the appointment is less a leap into the unknown than a continuation of a method — one that has already reshaped West Africa’s mining landscape once.

A reputation built through diverse experiences, further honed at Endeavour Mining

When de Montessus took the helm of Endeavour Mining in 2016, the company was a modest mid-tier gold producer with limited visibility beyond specialist investors. Its asset base was fragmented, its growth story uncertain, and its operational execution exposed to the risks that have long deterred international capital from African mining.

Over the following eight years, that profile changed dramatically. Endeavour became West Africa’s largest gold producer, with annual output exceeding one million ounces and a portfolio spanning Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso and Senegal. It entered the FTSE 100 in 2021, a rare achievement for a company whose assets were entirely African.

Advertisement

The transformation was not driven by aggressive leverage or speculative expansion. Instead, Sébastien de Montessus imposed a tightly defined investment framework. Each mine would need to demonstrate a life of more than ten years, annual production above 200,000 ounces and a disciplined cost structure capable of generating cash flow across commodity cycles. Growth was a consequence of quality, not its substitute.

That discipline translated into execution. With his team, Flagship projects such as the Houndé mine in Burkina Faso and the Ity CIL expansion in Côte d’Ivoire were delivered ahead of schedule and under budget — outcomes that remain exceptions rather than norms in the global gold sector. Selective acquisitions, notably of Semafo and Teranga Gold, consolidated high-quality assets along the Birimian greenstone belt, reinforcing Endeavour’s regional coherence without undermining financial stability. What distinguished these transactions was not only their industrial logic, but their timing. Both were executed during the Covid-19 pandemic, a period when most mining operators were singularly focused on business continuity, supply-chain resilience and workforce protection — challenges that were arguably more acute for extractive industries than for many other sectors. At a moment when peers were retrenching, Endeavour pursued external and organic growth simultaneously, integrating new assets while maintaining uninterrupted operations across its existing portfolio. The ability to balance acquisition-driven expansion with operational stability under unprecedented global disruption underscored the managerial discipline that defined de Montessus’s tenure.

Operational rigour in complex environments

What distinguished de Montessus’s tenure was not only scale, but predictability. Under his leadership, Endeavour built a reputation for doing what it said it would do — a currency of rare value in emerging-market mining.

From the outset of his tenure in 2016, Sébastien de Montessus also moved early on issues that would later become central to the industry. On security, he acted well before the terrorist risk in parts of the Sahel was widely acknowledged by most mining operators. While peers largely framed security around asset protection and gold theft, Endeavour broadened its risk assessment early, recruiting specialised profiles and investing in appropriate capabilities to protect personnel, assets and business continuity as regional threats evolved.

Advertisement

Labour relations proved another source of operational stability. In a sector where strikes are a common means of negotiation, Endeavour experienced no site-level work stoppages during his tenure — an uncommon outcome in African mining. This reflected a sustained social dialogue and an effort to align interests, notably through a group-wide incentive system linked to production and cost performance and extended to all employees, from entry-level roles to site management.

Health and safety were treated as foundational rather than procedural. In a high-risk industry, management emphasis was placed on leadership behaviour and field presence, reinforcing the view that safety performance was inseparable from operational excellence.

Exploration success reinforced that credibility. By concentrating on well-understood geological corridors in West Africa, Endeavour added millions of ounces to its resource base at discovery costs among the lowest in the industry. The strategy illustrated a recurring theme in de Montessus’s approach: focus on depth rather than dispersion, and on repeatable processes rather than one-off bets.

Alongside operations, corporate governance was professionalised. Reporting standards were aligned with international expectations, environmental and social programmes expanded, and community investment became a structural component of project development. Endeavour’s evolution helped challenge long-standing investor scepticism about African-based miners, demonstrating that scale, governance and operational discipline could coexist on the continent.

Advertisement

The end of a chapter — and the opening of another

De Montessus’s departure from Endeavour in early 2024 followed an internal dispute that was ultimately resolved through an agreement between the company and its former chief executive. While the episode closed a significant chapter, it did little to diminish the industrial legacy of his tenure. The portfolio structure, operating culture and regional footprint he established remain central to Endeavour’s strategy today.

His appointment at Mansa Resources should therefore be read not as a reinvention, but as a redeployment of experience. Mansa, backed by Africaninvestors and positioned as a long-term mining platform, enters the market at a moment when capital discipline, geopolitical awareness and operational credibility are again at a premium.

Behind Mansa Resources stands Idrissa Nassa, one of West Africa’s most discreet but consequential business figures. Best known as the founder and chief executive of Coris Bank International, Nassa has built his influence far beyond finance, assembling a diversified portfolio that spans banking, mining, energy distribution and trade. His trajectory — from modest beginnings in the markets of Ouagadougou to boardrooms in Abidjan, Dakar and London — reflects a methodical form of entrepreneurship rooted in capital discipline and local anchoring.

In recent years, he has accelerated strategic acquisitions, including assets divested by international groups, positioning African-controlled capital at the centre of sectors long dominated by foreign operators. For Mansa, Nassa provides not only financial backing but a long-term industrial vision: one that views mining not as an isolated extractive activity, but as part of a broader ecosystem linking finance, infrastructure and regional development.

Advertisement

Mansa Resources: ambition shaped by experience

Although still in its early stages, Mansa has set out an ambition that resonates with de Montessus’s track record: to build a diversified mining company rooted in Africa, capable of developing assets responsibly and competitively over the long term.

The context is markedly different from that of 2016. Commodity markets are more volatile, financing conditions tighter, and geopolitical scrutiny of critical resources more intense. At the same time, African governments are increasingly assertive about local value creation, governance and environmental standards.

For Sébastien de Montessus, these constraints are not unfamiliar. His career has been defined by navigating precisely these tensions — between risk and discipline, growth and restraint, frontier opportunity and institutional expectations. At Mansa, the challenge will be to apply that same operating logic from the ground up, rather than at the scale of an established producer.

A leadership style shaped by finance and execution

Trained in corporate finance, de Montessus has consistently approached mining as an industrial business rather than a speculative pursuit. Capital allocation, cost control and long-term asset quality have taken precedence over headline growth. That mindset has often set him apart in a sector prone to cyclical exuberance.

Advertisement

At Endeavour, it enabled the company to grow through cycles without compromising balance-sheet resilience. At Mansa, it is likely to influence how projects are selected, financed and sequenced — favouring clarity of execution over speed.

For investors, the significance of his nomination lies less in immediate production targets than in governance and credibility. In frontier mining, leadership track record often matters as much as geology. De Montessus brings with him a reputation forged in one of the most demanding operating theatres in the industry.

His legacy at Endeavour Mining is also measurable in what has — and has not — changed since his departure. The portfolio structure he assembled remains largely intact, and the operational framework he imposed continues to underpin the company’s performance. While the sharp rise in gold prices — which have more than doubled from their lows during his tenure — has lifted valuations across the sector, the structural fundamentals at Endeavour were laid earlier: long-life assets, disciplined capital allocation, and a coherent regional focus. The architecture he put in place has proved durable, suggesting that the model was not cyclical, but structural.

That durability reflects a management philosophy he once summarised internally in a simple principle: clarity of strategy, accountability in execution, and alignment between capital and operations. Colleagues describe a leader who prefers forward motion to preservation, who challenges organisational inertia and expects teams to evolve rather than defend precedent. That restlessness has often been an engine of growth — though, in highly structured public companies, such momentum can sometimes create friction at board level. Those who worked with him note that he is not inclined to manage by consensus alone; he is known to push for change when he believes the industrial logic demands it.

Advertisement

At Mansa Resources, that appetite for movement will operate within a different ownership structure. Alongside the backing of Idrissa Nassa, the shareholder base includes Orion Resource Partners, the US-based mining investment fund known for its highly selective approach to capital deployment. Orion’s due diligence processes — extending beyond assets to management teams — are regarded in the industry as among the most rigorous. Their decision to support Mansa reflects a calculated confidence not only in the geological prospects ahead, but in the leadership tasked with executing them.

A return to first principles

The appointment of Sébastien de Montessus as CEO of Mansa Resources signals a return to first principles: disciplined growth, regional focus and operational realism. If his years at Endeavour Mining demonstrated how a mid-tier producer could become a global contender, Mansa represents an opportunity to apply those lessons from inception.

In a mining industry once again forced to confront its own excesses, his trajectory offers a reminder that scale is built not through bold promises, but through consistency. For de Montessus, Mansa is not a departure from that philosophy — it is its logical continuation.

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Oil Prices Surge in Australia Amid Middle East Conflict, Driving Petrol Pump Pain for Motorists

Published

on

Oil Prices Surge in Australia Amid Middle East Conflict, Driving

CANBERRA, Australia — Oil prices have spiked sharply in global markets due to escalating conflict in the Middle East, pushing Australian petrol prices higher and raising concerns about inflation and household budgets as the nation grapples with supply vulnerabilities.

Brent crude, the international benchmark most relevant to Australian imports, traded around US$78 to US$80 per barrel in early March 2026 trading, up significantly from mid-US$60s levels seen in late 2025 and early this year. West Texas Intermediate hovered above US$70. The surge follows U.S. and Israeli military actions against Iran, disrupting key shipping routes like the Strait of Hormuz and injecting a geopolitical premium into energy markets.

Oil Prices Surge in Australia Amid Middle East Conflict, Driving
Oil Prices Surge in Australia Amid Middle East Conflict, Driving Petrol Pump Pain for Motorists

In Australia, which imports more than 90% of its crude oil and refined fuels, the impact has been swift. National average retail prices for unleaded 91-octane petrol stood at approximately 172.9 Australian cents per liter in the week ending Feb. 22, according to the Australian Institute of Petroleum (AIP). However, city-specific figures show higher levels amid the ongoing cycle and recent volatility: Sydney around A$1.98 per liter, Melbourne A$2.08, and Brisbane A$2.02 as of early March. Some stations in major cities reported unleaded prices exceeding A$2.13 per liter, with diesel averages around 180.3 cents per liter nationally.

Analysts warn of further increases. A common rule of thumb holds that every US$10 rise in crude adds roughly 10 Australian cents per liter at the pump. With Brent jumping from around US$67 in late February to near US$80, motorists could face hikes of 10-20 cents per liter in the short term, and potentially up to 40 cents in extreme scenarios if disruptions persist. Compare the Market spokesperson Chris Ford noted that a 30% increase from current levels could push unleaded 91 past A$2.50 per liter in some regions, costing A$125 to fill a 50-liter tank.

The Australian Institute of Petroleum’s weekly report for the week ending March 1, 2026, highlighted rising international crude and petrol import prices supplied by Argus Media. Retail prices reflect a combination of global benchmarks, the Australian dollar exchange rate, excise taxes, and local competition cycles that see prices swing weekly in cities like Sydney, Melbourne, and Brisbane.

Advertisement

Geopolitical tensions have amplified risks. The conflict has raised fears of prolonged supply interruptions through critical chokepoints, prompting warnings from the Reserve Bank of Australia Governor Michele Bullock. She described a “live” chance of an interest rate hike at the March meeting, citing prolonged oil price spikes as a threat to inflation control and economic growth. Bullock noted that elevated energy costs could prove stubborn, complicating the central bank’s efforts to tame inflation.

Australia’s fuel security adds urgency. The nation maintains stocks equivalent to only about 36-90 days of supply in some assessments, well below the International Energy Agency’s 90-day target for members. Recent reports indicate petrol reserves have dipped low, heightening vulnerability to shocks. Experts like those from NRMA and Compare the Market have urged motorists not to panic but to fill up strategically, as prices could climb 6-10% or more depending on developments.

ASX-listed energy companies have benefited from the rally. Woodside Energy shares rose 6.15% to A$30.05, up nearly 30% year-to-date, while Santos climbed 5.62% to A$7.14, gaining about 16% in 2026. The broader market felt pressure, with the S&P/ASX 200 dropping amid global uncertainty, though energy stocks provided some offset.

Household impacts extend beyond the pump. Higher fuel costs feed into transport, goods delivery, and inflation. Commonwealth Bank analysts warned of economic “consequences” from sustained spikes, including threats to growth. Diesel sales have surged due to increased home deliveries and logistics demand, while sales of E10 ethanol blends and LPG have declined.

Advertisement

The government has monitored the situation closely. FuelWatch in Western Australia advised Perth and Mandurah motorists to fill up before expected rises, with average unleaded projected to hit 188.6 cents per liter from March 4, and some brands reaching 213.9 cents. Low-price options remained available below 155 cents at select sites.

Longer-term trends show volatility. Brent averaged in the mid-US$60s for much of late 2025, far below 2022 peaks above US$100. The current rally marks the highest levels since mid-2022, driven by supply fears rather than demand surges. OPEC+ decisions, non-OPEC production, and global economic outlook will influence whether the spike proves temporary or entrenched.

Motorists can mitigate costs by using apps like FuelWatch or PetrolSpy to find cheapest stations, timing fills during low-cycle periods, and considering fuel-efficient vehicles. Electric vehicle adoption continues to grow as an alternative amid rising liquid fuel prices.

As the Middle East situation evolves, oil and petrol prices remain fluid. Analysts monitor for de-escalation, which could unwind premiums quickly, or further escalation that sustains higher levels. For now, Australian drivers face elevated costs at the bowser, a direct echo of distant geopolitical events reshaping daily life and the economy.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Built Around the Working Technologist

Published

on

Built Around the Working Technologist

Pulse Radiology Education was founded in 2015 by Neil Huber, a radiologic technologist who saw a gap in his own profession and decided to address it.

Huber began his career in New York. He earned a BS in Radiologic Sciences from St. John’s University and later completed an MBA in Strategic Healthcare Management & Entrepreneurship at Hofstra University. Early in his career, he worked inside imaging departments and healthcare organisations. That experience shaped his perspective.

“I kept meeting great technologists who wanted to earn another certification but were stuck,” Huber said. “They wanted to advance, but they couldn’t quit their jobs or move their lives around to do it.”

Traditional training pathways often required rigid schedules and full-time classroom attendance. For working technologists managing shifts, family life and financial responsibilities, that model did not fit.

So in 2015, he launched Pulse Radiology Education in New York City.

Advertisement

From the beginning, the focus was clear: combine structured online education with in-person clinical training. The goal was not to build another online school. It was to create a realistic pathway for advancement.

“You can study after a double shift or on your day off,” Huber often told early students. “You control the pace.”

Clinical placement quickly became central to the model. Huber had seen firsthand how difficult it was for technologists to secure hands-on training sites.

“Securing a clinical site is the part that stops most people cold,” he said. “We wanted to remove that barrier completely.”

Advertisement

Over time, Pulse built partnerships with hospitals and imaging centres across the country. Today, it works with more than 1,300 clinical affiliates in MRI, CT and Mammography.

In 2020, the organisation expanded further with the launch of Pulse Radiology Institute in Saint Augustine, Florida. PRI offers an ARMRIT-accredited MRI Associate’s Degree and clinical placement for individuals entering the field without prior technologist credentials. Together, PRE and PRI serve both working technologists and new entrants into imaging.

As healthcare demands evolved, so did the programme structure. Pulse developed tiered pathways for MRI and CT:

  • Basic: ARRT-approved didactic coursework
  • Premium: Coursework plus clinical placement
  • Ultra: Coursework, clinical placement and simulator access

Each tier was designed to reflect different needs, while maintaining ARRT-approved structured education and registry-focused preparation. Programmes include mock exams and more than 1,000 registry-style questions per modality.

“Our goal was never to create the cheapest programme,” Huber said. “It was to create the most realistic path for working RTs to advance.”

Advertisement

In 2025, Pulse Radiology Education was acquired by Edcetera, an education company focused on licensed careers. For Huber, the alignment was practical.

“Education should be accessible, relevant and transformative,” he said, echoing the broader vision behind the acquisition. “But our purpose stayed the same.”

Today, Pulse supports technologists seeking post-primary ARRT credentials, non-technologists entering MRI through PRI, and healthcare leaders building multimodality imaging teams.

Huber views growth as a responsibility rather than an endpoint.

Advertisement

“Hospitals depend on competent and certified technologists. Patients depend on accurate scans. Technologists depend on training that fits their lives. Our job is to meet all three.”

Nearly a decade after its founding, Pulse Radiology Education remains focused on access, structure and clinical partnership. The mission has not shifted since 2015.

“If we can help someone move into MRI or CT without leaving their job or family behind,” Huber said, “then we’re doing something meaningful.”

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Business

Extreme Networks, Inc. (EXTR) Presents at Morgan Stanley Technology, Media & Telecom Conference 2026 Transcript

Published

on

OneWater Marine Inc. (ONEW) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Extreme Networks, Inc. (EXTR) Morgan Stanley Technology, Media & Telecom Conference 2026 March 4, 2026 5:35 PM EST

Company Participants

Kevin Rhodes – Executive VP of Finance & CFO

Conference Call Participants

Advertisement

Meta Marshall – Morgan Stanley, Research Division

Presentation

Meta Marshall
Morgan Stanley, Research Division

Advertisement

I’m going to read some disclosures that you’ve heard many times. For important disclosures, please see the Morgan Stanley research disclosure website at morganstanley.com/researchdisclosures. If you have any questions, please reach out to your Morgan Stanley sales representative. We’re delighted to have Extreme Networks here today, Kevin Rhodes, CFO. We also have Stan Kovler in the audience. And then myself, I’m Meta Marshall. I cover networking here at Morgan Stanley.

So Kevin, thanks so much for being here today.

Kevin Rhodes
Executive VP of Finance & CFO

Advertisement

Good to see you again.

Question-and-Answer Session

Advertisement

Meta Marshall
Morgan Stanley, Research Division

You recently rolled out some impressive targets at your Analyst Day calling for share gains in the market. which we’ll dive into in a minute. Can you just kind of refresh everybody here on Extreme’s value proposition and kind of the key verticals that you serve?

Kevin Rhodes
Executive VP of Finance & CFO

Advertisement

Sure, sure. Happy to. And by the way, at the Analyst Day, I would say that was a good day for us to roll out for the next several years what we are going to achieve 10% growth on the revenue side, 20% growth on the bottom line side. And we’ve been executing pretty well, right? 7 quarters in a row of growth as a company. And so that was a meaningful kind of event for us to talk to investors about what we’re trying to do.

From a market perspective, as you can probably appreciate, we’re on the wired and wireless

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Trinity Village shopping centre attracts $33m

Published

on

Trinity Village shopping centre attracts $33m

The transaction represents the second Perth shopping centre Harmony Property Investments has acquired this year.

Continue Reading

Business

Wait for dust to settle before taking fresh bets, says Maulik Patel

Published

on

Wait for dust to settle before taking fresh bets, says Maulik Patel
Amid rising geopolitical tensions and sharp swings in global markets, investors are once again debating whether such periods of uncertainty present buying opportunities or call for caution. According to Maulik Patel from Equirus Securities patience may be the more prudent strategy in the current environment. Speaking to ET Now, Patel suggested that investors should allow a few days for developments to unfold before taking aggressive positions in the market.

“So, I would wait for a couple of days for things to settle down,” Patel said, noting that the present crisis differs in several ways from conflicts witnessed over the past two decades. “Now, this kind of crisis particularly what we are seeing today is different from let us say 10, 15, or 20 years. It is more similar to the first Gulf war in 1991 when between Iran and the coalition forces or so, but it is not that bad like what we saw in 1973 when there was an Arab embargo on the oil export to the western nations and in that case the price moved by almost 300%.”

Patel explained that during the 1991 Gulf War, oil prices had already surged months before the conflict officially began as markets anticipated the buildup of military action. “In case of 1991, the price moved double for three-four months before even the war started because there was a buildup of military assets, there was a coalition force, so market anticipated this,” he said. Once the war actually began, however, the market quickly reassessed the situation. “As soon as the war started, the price started to correct down as market realised that Saddam Hussein is losing this war.”

He believes a similar anticipatory trend has been visible in oil markets this year. “Oil started moving up already in the first or second week of January. Even if you look at a lot of passive money has moved to the oil and oil related stocks,” Patel noted. “There is an ETF in US called XLE which is up almost 22% year to date, so that reflect that kind of a money which has moved in that.”

Advertisement

While his base expectation is that the conflict may end relatively quickly, Patel cautioned that predicting the duration of wars is rarely easy. “Now if you ask me, the view is that the war should get over in a week. However, it is difficult to predict the duration of war,” he said. He pointed to the Russia–Ukraine conflict as an example of how initial assumptions can prove incorrect. “When the Ukraine war started, most of us believed that the war will last probably one month at max. But we are in the fifth year of the war.”


During the early months of that conflict, crude oil prices surged sharply. “When the war accelerated in month of March 2022 and April 22, the oil moved to the almost $120, $130 a barrel,” Patel recalled. Over time, however, markets adjusted as supply chains shifted and production increased. “The Russian barrel reroute from Europe to Asia particularly China and India, market stabilised. OPEC increased the production and what you saw that even the war is still going on, the oil has come down to $60 even last year.”
The current situation carries additional risks because of Iran’s strategic location. “Iran sits in the Strait of Hormuz which is 20% of the global oil demand passed through that, 20% of the world’s LNG demand pass through that,” Patel said. He also highlighted emerging disruptions in global LNG supply. “What we are seeing today Qatar which is 18% of the world’s liquefaction capacity, they have announced a force majeure. There is a real disruption is there.” Given these uncertainties, he believes investors should wait for clearer signals before turning bullish. “Probably we would like to wait for a couple of days how things are moving up and then taken a bullish view on market once we see the regime is collapsed or the attacks which are happening from the Iran getting reduced day by day and then we can make another constructive call on the market.”Turning to the debate around artificial intelligence and its potential impact on the IT services industry, Patel said the adoption of enterprise AI would still depend heavily on system integrators such as Indian IT companies. “AI without a system integrator or like Infosys, HCL that is not possible to develop in enterprise customers,” he said. While consumer AI tools are widely accessible, enterprise deployment requires deep customization. “You can have AI for retail the way you and I use the ChatGPT or Gemini or few other, but for enterprise to use it they need customised and the customisation will be done by the system integrators like Indian IT companies.”

Patel said the recent sell-off in IT stocks was not driven by immediate earnings concerns but by uncertainty about long-term profitability. “The sell off two-three weeks back is not related to the near-term earnings, it is that what would be the earning trajectory five years down the line,” he explained. In the short term, however, AI adoption could actually boost demand for technology services. “In near term, you may see earnings moves upward because there is an accelerated development of the AI across the enterprise,” he said. The bigger question remains whether AI-driven productivity gains could lead to pricing pressure over time. “What will happen to the earnings four or five year down the line, will there be a deflation in the pricing given that kind of a productivity gain delivered by the AI, so that is what the real question or the concerns among the investors.”

Despite these uncertainties, Patel believes the recent correction has made valuations in the sector more reasonable. “The valuation has become reasonable for many of the largecap and you see that rupee has depreciated by almost 2% in the last two days,” he noted, adding that this combination could attract buyers back into IT stocks. “So, we will see some kind of buying emerge at in IT stocks given that they are relatively safe in this disruption period what you see.”

Looking ahead, Patel said that if geopolitical tensions ease, investors should focus on sectors that have corrected the most. “Where we will bet obviously where the stocks have fallen the maximum,” he said. Energy companies could rebound sharply if supply routes reopen. “If the flow in the Strait of Hormuz restart, if Qatar starts LNG production obviously the one which has fallen the maximum are HP, BP, gail PLNG within the energy pack which we will like it a lot.” He also sees opportunities in high-beta manufacturing stocks. “Some of these high beta stocks like in EMS that have also fallen a lot like Dixon which can be again play on the reversal of memory prices which is again linked to the IT.”

Advertisement

Metals could also offer opportunities, he said, because underlying commodity prices remain relatively strong. “We may go for high beta in metal because mean metal prices are still at an elevated level. The stocks have corrected because of the leverage positions, the fear factor.” Patel also pointed to cement stocks as another potential area of interest as the sector enters its peak demand season. “Cement, now we are entering into peak cement demand season perspective and cement stocks have also corrected in anticipation and because of the higher oil price will lead to the higher petcoke prices and the higher cost for them.”

At the same time, Patel advised caution in a few segments of the market. While he does not believe in completely avoiding markets, he said certain sectors currently lack clear triggers. “There is no absolute nothing,” he remarked, but added that some pharma companies dependent on the US generics market could face competitive pressure. “We probably will avoid some of these pharma companies which are largely dependent on the US generic market because of any kind of competition they will see in some of these key drugs.” He also remains cautious on FMCG stocks due to limited earnings catalysts. “We will avoid FMCG to a certain extent given that there is no incremental earnings positive triggers are there on those one.”

Patel also flagged elevated valuations in parts of the capital goods and defence sectors. “Obviously, in capital goods some of the names are still very expensive,” he said. While defence stocks often rally during geopolitical tensions, he believes the risk-reward in some counters remains unfavourable. “Whenever the conflict start that the defence stocks make a very big move, but some of the defence names the multiples are still at a very-very elevated level, we will avoid that.”

Overall, Patel’s advice to investors is to remain patient and selective during periods of uncertainty, waiting for clearer signals before making fresh bullish bets in the market.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Politics And The Markets 03/05/26

Published

on

OneWater Marine Inc. (ONEW) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

This is the forum for daily political discussion on Seeking Alpha. A new version is published every market day.

Please don’t leave political comments on other articles or posts on the site.

The comments below are not regulated with the same rigor as the rest of the site, and this is an ‘enter at your own risk’ area as discussion can get very heated. If you can’t stand the heat… you know what they say…

More on Today’s Markets:

Advertisement

The Fed chief-in-waiting is set to take the helm at the central bank at the end of May, assuming the nomination process goes as expected. His first FOMC meeting would come June 16–17. The White House mission has been to get the fed funds rate lower, and Warsh is expected to move in that direction once he replaces Jay Powell.

“It’s my strong belief that the tariff rates will be back to their old rate within five months,” Bessent said in an interview on CNBC’s “Squawk Box.”

A White House official indicated that the investments are meant to replicate established indexes. Furthermore, it was maintained that neither President Trump nor any member of his family has direct influence on how the portfolio is invested or when investments are bought or sold.

The discussions come as U.S. weapons inventories have been strained by several conflicts in recent years. Since Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine and Israel’s war in Gaza, the United States has supplied billions of dollars in arms to allies, including artillery systems, ammunition and anti-tank missiles. Recent strikes on Iran have also drawn heavily

Continue Reading

Business

Panel approves luxury Hotel Sebatikel in Exmouth

Published

on

Panel approves luxury Hotel Sebatikel in Exmouth

A multi-million-dollar luxury hotel plan, comprising short-stay accommodation units and a golf green, in Exmouth has been approved.

Continue Reading

Business

Yara backs Pilbara clean fuel bunkering hub

Published

on

Yara backs Pilbara clean fuel bunkering hub

Norwegian fertiliser giant Yara has joined a group of industry and government stakeholders pushing plans for an ammonia ship refuelling hub in the Pilbara.

Continue Reading

Business

China sets lowest economic growth target since 1991

Published

on

China sets lowest economic growth target since 1991

It is also the first time the target has been lowered since it was cut to “around 5%” in 2023.

Continue Reading

Business

Dow Jones Industrial Average Falls Sharply as Geopolitical Tensions Over Iran War Weigh on Markets

Published

on

Coinbase Global

NEW YORK — The Dow Jones Industrial Average closed lower Tuesday, shedding more than 400 points amid persistent volatility driven by the escalating conflict involving Israel, the United States, and Iran. Investors grappled with fears of prolonged supply disruptions in global oil markets, though a late-session rebound trimmed earlier steep losses.

The blue-chip index ended at 48,501.27, down 403.51 points or 0.83% from Monday’s close of 48,904.78. Intraday trading saw dramatic swings: the Dow plunged as much as 1,250 points early in the session before recovering significantly as reports emerged of indirect U.S.-Iran contacts aimed at de-escalation and President Donald Trump’s assurances that the U.S. Navy would escort tankers through the Strait of Hormuz.

Dow Jones
Dow Jones

The broader market mirrored the unease. The S&P 500 slipped 0.94% to around 6,847, while the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite fell 1.02%. Volume reached 533 million shares on the Dow components, reflecting heightened trading activity.

The sell-off stemmed primarily from geopolitical developments. Fresh Israeli and U.S. strikes on Iranian targets, including infrastructure and security apparatus in Tehran, intensified concerns about a wider regional war. Oil prices extended their rally, with Brent crude climbing more than 2% to near $84 per barrel at one point — levels not seen since early 2025 — before easing slightly on hopes for diplomatic progress. Higher energy costs threaten to fuel inflation and pressure consumer spending, key vulnerabilities for an economy already navigating post-pandemic recovery challenges.

President Trump addressed the situation overnight, stating the U.S. stands ready to protect shipping lanes despite Iran’s threats. This provided some reassurance, contributing to the intraday rebound. Analysts noted that markets have historically shaken off geopolitical shocks relatively quickly if supply disruptions prove temporary, though sustained conflict could alter that dynamic.

Advertisement

Key Dow components showed mixed performance amid the turmoil. Energy-related names like Chevron gained on rising crude prices, while industrials such as Caterpillar and Boeing faced heavier selling pressure tied to broader economic fears. Tech and consumer stocks lagged, with declines in names like Nike and UnitedHealth contributing to the index’s drop.

Broader market sentiment reflected caution. The conflict has overshadowed other economic data, including upcoming ADP private payrolls figures expected later in the week. Treasury yields ticked higher as investors weighed inflation risks from energy costs against potential growth slowdowns.

Wall Street’s reaction aligns with global trends. Asian markets, including South Korea’s Kospi, reversed earlier gains amid the uncertainty, while European indexes also traded lower. Gold futures advanced as a safe-haven play, underscoring risk aversion.

Despite the decline, the Dow remains up about 12-14% over the past year, with a 52-week range from roughly 36,600 to over 50,500. The index has hovered near record highs in recent months before the latest volatility. Year-to-date performance has been positive, though the war has introduced new uncertainties.

Advertisement

Analysts offered varied outlooks. Some viewed the pullback as an overreaction to headlines, pointing to resilient corporate earnings and consumer strength. Others warned that prolonged Middle East instability could disrupt global supply chains, raise borrowing costs, and complicate Federal Reserve policy. The central bank has been monitoring energy price impacts closely, with higher oil potentially delaying rate adjustments.

The rebound from session lows highlighted dip-buying interest. Reports of possible indirect negotiations between the U.S. and Iran boosted hopes for containment, helping stocks claw back ground. Futures trading early Wednesday suggested a tentative recovery, with Dow futures up modestly around 0.1-0.3% in pre-market action as of March 4.

Looking ahead, market participants will watch for any de-escalation signals, oil price stabilization, and economic indicators. The conflict’s trajectory remains the dominant driver, with potential for continued swings if developments shift rapidly.

The Dow’s performance Tuesday underscores the market’s sensitivity to geopolitical risks, even as underlying fundamentals show resilience. Investors remain focused on balancing short-term volatility against longer-term growth prospects in an uncertain global environment.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025