Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Business

Goldman Sachs says Iran war unlikely to trigger COVID-like supply crisis

Published

on

Goldman Sachs says Iran war unlikely to trigger COVID-like supply crisis

The war in Iran is pushing oil and gas prices higher, and while the world economy faces a shock from energy prices, an analysis by Goldman Sachs finds that the conflict is unlikely to lead to a broader supply chain crisis like what occurred due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Economists at Goldman Sachs found that the Iran war is expected to lead to higher oil prices that will reduce global economic growth by 0.3% of GDP while increasing headline inflation by about 0.5 to 0.6 percentage points over the next year, with a smaller 0.1 to 0.2 percentage point boost to core inflation.

Advertisement

The report noted that risks are skewed toward larger impacts as long as the Strait of Hormuz remains closed to shipping. The strait is a narrow choke point that shipping traffic from the Persian Gulf must pass through to access global sea lanes.

Goldman Sachs assessed that global central banks will be particularly sensitive to inflation concerns in the wake of the supply chain disruptions that occurred due to the pandemic and were a key contributor to a surge in inflation. However, the economists’ analysis sees the Iran war supply shock as being limited to energy as opposed to the broader supply chain.

ENERGY SECRETARY WRIGHT SAYS US COULD SOON ESCORT TANKERS IN STRAIT OF HORMUZ, BUT ‘NOT READY’ YET

Smoke rises after reported Iranian missile attacks, following strikes by the United States and Israel against Iran, in Manama

Iran has conducted missile strikes against targets in the Middle East amid the conflict. (Reuters)

“A key difference between 2021-2022 and today, however, is that today’s shock is more narrowly concentrated in the energy sector, whereas the energy price increases in 2022 were only one aspect of a much broader global supply chain crisis and inflation surge,” the Goldman Sachs economists wrote.

Advertisement

One of the reasons for the supply shock being confined to energy products is that most of the developed economies around the world have limited non-energy trade exposure to countries in the Middle East.

The report found that less than 1% of imports to the U.S. and other developed markets like the Eurozone, the U.K., Japan and Canada come from the Middle East. By comparison, China and East Asia account for more than 20% of global trade, Goldman’s analysis noted.

TRUMP SAYS US ‘LARGEST OIL PRODUCER IN THE WORLD,’ BUT PRIORITY REMAINS STOPPING IRAN NUCLEAR CAPABILITIES

Oil tankers in the Strait of Hormuz.

One reason why the supply shock is being confined to energy products is that most of the developed economies have limited non-energy trade exposure to countries in the Middle East. (Giuseppe Cacace/AFP via Getty Images)

Another contrast with the 2021-2022 supply chain issues is that fewer disruptions of critical inputs and “just in time” inventory management are anticipated, as the analysis found the Middle East’s potential bottleneck exports are focused on certain chemicals and metals that are unlikely to create significant disruptions.

Advertisement

Goldman Sachs said methanol appears to be the most likely source of production disruptions, as it’s used in making acetic acid, which helps produce industrial adhesives, solvents and paints. 

Iran is the source of about 20% of global production capacity and while the loss of that supply could have an impact over the longer term, the economists don’t see clear choke points at this time.

TRUMP ADMIN INVOKES DEFENSE PRODUCTION ACT, DIRECTS OIL COMPANY TO RESTART CALIFORNIA OPERATIONS

Strait of Hormuz at standstill

Ships transiting the Strait of Hormuz are at risk of attack from Iran. (Fox News)

The third reason the firm sees limited supply chain impacts beyond the energy sector is that the Middle East isn’t a significant trade hub where products are re-exported from.

Advertisement

Vessels such as yachts, tugboats and floating cranes are the main goods that are re-exported from Middle Eastern countries.

“In summary, our analysis suggests that the major risk to global supply and inflation is mostly confined to energy, which limits the risk that the severe supply chain disruptions (and associated surge in inflation) and large second-round inflation effects observed in 2021-2022 will re-emerge,” the Goldman Sachs economists said.

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Business

Devon Energy: Merger Deal, Iran War, Price Tailwinds

Published

on

Devon Energy: Merger Deal, Iran War, Price Tailwinds

Devon Energy: Merger Deal, Iran War, Price Tailwinds

Continue Reading

Business

Dollar steady as traders fret about escalating Iran war

Published

on

Dollar steady as traders fret about escalating Iran war


Dollar steady as traders fret about escalating Iran war

Continue Reading

Business

Asia markets brace for Trump’s promised assault on Iranian infrastructure

Published

on


Asia markets brace for Trump’s promised assault on Iranian infrastructure

Continue Reading

Business

Oil prices rise as US-Israeli war with Iran continues to disrupt supply

Published

on

Oil prices rise as US-Israeli war with Iran continues to disrupt supply
TOKYO, – Oil prices climbed on Monday on continuing fears of supply losses because of shipping disruptions in the key Middle East producing region from the U.S.-Israeli war with Iran.

Brent crude futures rose $1.71, or 1.6%, to $110.74 a barrel by 0057 GMT. U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude futures gained $0.71, or 0.6%, to trade at $112.25 per barrel.

On Thursday, the last trading day before the Good Friday holiday break, WTI ‌settled up more ⁠than 11% ⁠and Brent soared nearly 8% in volatile trading, recording their biggest absolute price increase since 2020, as U.S. President Donald Trump promised to continue attacks on Iran.

The Strait of Hormuz, which carries oil and petroleum products from Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates, remains largely closed by Iranian attacks on shipping after the war began on February 28.

Advertisement

Because of the Middle East supply disruptions, refiners are seeking alternative sources for crude, particularly for physical ⁠cargoes in ‌the U.S. and the UK North Sea.


“Global buyers are bidding aggressively for (U.S.) Gulf Coast barrels and Brent is rallying even faster,” the Schork Group said in ⁠a client note on Monday.
On Sunday, Trump ratcheted up pressure on Tehran, threatening in an expletive-laden Easter Sunday social media post to target Iran’s power plants and bridges on Tuesday if the strategic Strait of Hormuz is not reopened. Still, some vessels, including an Omani-operated tanker, a French-owned container ship and a Japanese-owned gas carrier, crossed the Strait of Hormuz since Thursday, shipping data showed, reflecting Iran’s policy to allow passage for vessels from countries it deems friendly.

The war threatens to linger on as Iran ‌has officially told mediators it is not prepared to meet with U.S. officials in the Pakistani capital Islamabad in coming days and efforts to produce a ceasefire have reached a dead end, ⁠the Wall Street Journal reported on Friday.

On Sunday, OPEC+, consisting of some members of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and allies such as Russia, agreed to a modest rise of 206,000 barrels per day for May.

However, that decision will largely exist on paper as several of the group’s key producers are unable to raise output due to the war.

Advertisement

Russian supply has been disrupted recently by Ukrainian drone attacks on its Baltic Sea export terminal. Media reports on Sunday said its Ust-Luga terminal resumed loadings on Saturday after days of disruptions.

Continue Reading

Business

How one factory in China learned to live with Trump, tariffs and turmoil

Published

on

How one factory in China learned to live with Trump, tariffs and turmoil


How one factory in China learned to live with Trump, tariffs and turmoil

Continue Reading

Business

How China fell for a lobster: What an AI assistant tells us about Beijing's ambition

Published

on

How China fell for a lobster: What an AI assistant tells us about Beijing's ambition

The AI agent sparked a frenzy of “raising lobsters” in March, with users training the tool to suit their needs.

Continue Reading

Business

Trump’s trade war with China in focus ahead of May summit

Published

on

Trump’s trade war with China in focus ahead of May summit


Trump’s trade war with China in focus ahead of May summit

Continue Reading

Business

Oil back above $110 after expletive-laden Trump threat to Iran

Published

on

Oil back above $110 after expletive-laden Trump threat to Iran

Trump wrote: “Tuesday will be Power Plant Day, and Bridge Day, all wrapped up in one, in Iran. There will be nothing like it!!! Open the Fuckin’ Strait, you crazy bastards, or you’ll be living in Hell – JUST WATCH! Praise be to Allah. President DONALD J. TRUMP”.

Continue Reading

Business

Bank stocks’ $95 billion rout may deepen on macro risks

Published

on

Bank stocks’ $95 billion rout may deepen on macro risks
More pain awaits Indian banks stocks — the biggest component of the country’s stock market — as the central bank’s moves in the currency market and growth shock to the economy from rising energy prices dent profit outlook.

The Reserve Bank of India’s defense of a record-low rupee has constrained its ability to inject liquidity, tightening financial conditions that are likely to weigh on banks over the coming quarters. A prolonged conflict in the Middle East also risks derailing India’s nascent credit recovery, threatening loan growth as the broader economy cools.

Global investors withdrew a record 327 billion rupees ($3.5 billion) from shares of financial services companies in the first fortnight of March, according to National Securities Depository Ltd. data. The Nifty Bank Index has lost $95 billion in market value since the start of March, narrowly avoiding a bear market — defined as a 20% drop from a recent high.

“There could be further pressure on these stocks in the short-to-medium term as monetary policy can remain tight,” Kranthi Bathini, an equity strategist at WealthMills Securities, said, adding that valuations are becoming attractive after the correction.

Advertisement
453177410Agencies

At stake is the outlook for India’s $4.5 trillion stock market, given banks account for nearly a third of the benchmark index. A sustained weakness in shares of lenders could undermine a broader market that is already among the worst performers in the region, down 13% for the year.


Bulls point to improving valuation multiples for bank stocks and India’s long-term economic growth, which remains among the fastest globally. The Nifty Bank Index trades at 1.5 times one-year forward price-to-book, its cheapest level since 2020, signaling an attractive risk-reward profile.
Citibank Inc. is already prioritizing private-sector banks over state-run lenders, betting that the former can better absorb the macroeconomic stress that is now the prime concern for investors.Still, Jefferies estimates banks could face as much as 50 billion rupees from unwinding their currency trades due to diktats of the central bank. Fitch Ratings sees net interest margins of lenders shrinking 20-30 basis points in the year ending March 2027 — potentially undershooting the credit rating agency’s 3.1% forecast — as tighter financial conditions weigh.

“Banks will definitely take some hit on their investment book,” said Rajat Agarwal, an Asia strategist at Societe Generale SA. “We recently saw a pickup in credit growth — what remains to be seen is how much of that gets pushed back” by the war, he said.

Continue Reading

Business

FY26 IPO performance: Only 1 in 3 delivered returns amid market volatility

Published

on

FY26 IPO performance: Only 1 in 3 delivered returns amid market volatility
ET Intelligence Group: FY26 was a challenging year for the primary equity market, with most initial public offerings (IPOs) failing to earn returns since listing till March 31 amid heightened volatility. While geopolitical tensions in West Asia and weakening rupee amid the exodus of foreign investors affected the overall equity performance, there were a select few IPOs that managed to stay in the green. Of the 109 mainboard IPOs that were listed in FY26, 32 or one out of three IPOs posted positive returns while 16 IPOs yielded double-digit returns over the listing price. This also implies that by and large, the primary equity market did not earn returns after listing.

Among the top gainers were electric bikes maker Ather Energy (139% return), auto ancillary manufacturer Belrise Industries (98%), and Aditya Infotech (78%), which provides video surveillance solutions.

Instead of listing price, if offer price is considered, then the proportion of companies improves – 37 IPOs generated returns while 31 yielded double-digit returns. The same three companies made it to the top three slots. Aditya Infotech took the lead with 168% return over the offer price while Ather Energy and Belrise gained 143% and 116%.

Only 1 in 3 IPOs Brought Cheer in FY26Agencies

In a volatile market, just 16 IPOs yielded double-digit returns over listing price

It was also the year when majority of the large IPOs based on the issue size or money raised failed to generate returns. Only a quarter of the top 12 IPOs – four to be precise – earned returns. These include Lenskart and Groww generating 26% return each, followed by 11% return by ICICI Prudential AMC and 8% by Tenneco Clean Air India.
Among the worst performing IPOs of FY26 were steel products maker VMS TMT, which fell 62% from the listing price followed by construction company Highway Infrastructure and renewable energy equipment provider Solarworld Energy Solutions which lost 60% each.

Advertisement


Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025