Stand Golf Club says work is need to secure site’s ‘long-term viable and sustainable future’
A 105-home plan for part of a Bury golf course has been branded ‘catastrophic’ with scores of objections lodged.
Residents fear the scheme, for Stand Golf Course at the edge of Whitefield, will have a ‘terrible impact’ on their neighbourhoods if it is allowed. More than 100 objections have been filed against the plan, with concerns ranging from the impacts on roads and services to loss of natural habitats and increased noise and light pollution.
The project would see the existing clubhouse at the golf course demolished and rebuilt on the opposite side of the course. In its places, 45 houses and 60 retirement apartments would be built on the cleared land.
Applicants Stand Golf Club and Westshield Ltd said the work is needed to ‘secure the long term viable and sustainable future of Stand Golf Club’. The condition of the current clubhouse is ‘declining’ and income suffering as a result as clubs and community groups are unwilling to use it.
Stand Golf Club hopes the new building will fix this problem. It will feature a shop, indoor swing rooms, members lounge, bar and kitchen and terraces, while a separate suite will offer space for weddings, events and community bookings.
The scheme will also see the Old Standians sports ground regenerated, with the club saying this is currently ‘disused and in poor condition’. The changing facilities at the grounds were destroyed in a fire, they added.
The housing is needed to fund the new club house, documents add. These will be a mix of two-, three- and four-bed houses, along with one- and two-bed apartments.
Access will be off Ashbourne Grove, with four of the houses accessed via West View Grove. Some 89 parking spaces are proposed to be included in the plans.
Some 101 objections have been lodged with Trafford council against the plan, along with a handful of comments in support.
One respondent said: “I totally object to this proposal. This area is quiet, residential homes, a project of this size will completely change the area and have a terrible impact, not only to all the local residents but on congestion, road safety with major concerns for adequate service provisions. There are already significant traffic issues in this area.
“The area is green belt with a huge impact on the local wildlife and trees, there are areas available locally that are brown site areas without this environmental impact. The design of the project is not sensitive to the local area, it’s cheap, ugly and over developed with no consideration for noise, disturbance and loss of privacy for the local residents, there are not adequate parking provisions.
“I chose and paid to live on a quiet, tree lined Grove and have been lucky enough to live here for twenty years, this proposal not only breaks my heart but makes me wonder when will we ever learn about the importance of our green areas.”
A second added: “I object whole heartedly to this project. The project is not in keeping with any of the local area, a huge development on a very small site that is completely out of character, inadequate parking, excessive noise pollution, drainage issues and horrific effect on an already stretched road system.
“This is green belt land with a huge amount of wildlife including bats, hedgehogs, deer and a wealth of different birds. They are proposing cutting down established trees for what? All for a golf club house with better shower facilities. The effect on the local residents with noise, traffic, pollution and road safety will be catastrophic.”
Local Reform councillor Shadman Zaman has also registered his objection to the scheme, saying he is ‘deeply concerned’ the plan would ‘result in significant and harmful impacts upon the surrounding residential area, local infrastructure, environmental character and wider community amenity’.
He added: “The locality already experiences substantial peak-time congestion, school-related traffic pressures and parking difficulties. Residents are therefore deeply concerned that the proposed scale of development would materially worsen existing infrastructure pressures […]
“Many residents feel the proposal would fundamentally and permanently alter the nature of what has historically been a quieter and more open residential environment. This is not simply an abstract planning issue for residents – many are deeply concerned about the day-to-day impact upon their homes, gardens and family life.”
However, some support has also been signalled for the scheme among the local community.
One commenter said they believe the proposal will bring a ‘much needed boost to the local economy’ and will ‘create construction jobs and jobs at the golf club’. They added: “[There is a] need for housing in the area which this will also address. We need to start looking after our community and young (and old) unemployed and these jobs will be a lifeline. Housing will ease burden on council housing.”
A second added: “As a resident of Ringley road for the last 20 years my family are delighted and 100pc behind this application, we will support wherever possible. It would be a disaster if the club closed, and I dread to think what would happen to the area then.
“As there is an issue now with parking on Ashbourne Grove at the weekends, it has to be in the interests of the residents for a relocation of the clubhouse to Ringley Road. And the investment in the community would benefit everyone in Whitefield and the surrounding areas.”



You must be logged in to post a comment Login