Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Business

HMRC tax investigations into big businesses last nearly 3.5 years on average

Published

on

HMRC have increased the interest rates payable by taxpayers on late payments, to 7.75% - up from 7.5%, the highest interest charge on late payments since ca. 2001.

Tax investigations by HM Revenue & Customs into the UK’s largest companies are now taking nearly three and a half years to resolve on average, according to new analysis by multinational law firm Pinsent Masons.

The research shows that open tax investigations handled by HMRC’s Large Business Directorate (LBD) last an average of 41 months, roughly three years and five months, although this is slightly faster than the previous year’s average of 45 months.

The number of active cases has also increased, rising from 2,031 investigations to 2,149 over the past year. The rise reflects both HMRC’s efforts to clamp down on tax non-compliance and the significant amount of time required to conclude complex corporate tax enquiries.

HMRC’s Large Business Directorate focuses on the UK’s largest enterprises, roughly 2,000 companies with annual revenues exceeding £200 million. These businesses collectively account for around 40 per cent of all tax collected by the UK government.

With more than 2,100 investigations currently open, the figures suggest that roughly half of Britain’s largest companies are under some form of tax scrutiny at any given time. In many cases, companies may face multiple simultaneous enquiries covering different aspects of their tax affairs.

Advertisement

Jake Landman, partner and head of tax disputes at Pinsent Masons, said the growing number of cases partly reflects HMRC’s push to close the UK’s estimated £47 billion tax gap, the difference between the amount of tax owed and the amount actually collected.

“The increase in open investigations is being driven by HMRC’s increased efforts to tackle the tax gap as well as the time required to complete complex corporate investigations,” he said.

Over the past year alone, HMRC opened 1,879 new investigations into large businesses, an increase of 21.1 per cent, equivalent to 327 additional cases compared with the previous year.

Landman warned that prolonged investigations can place significant operational and financial strain on businesses, particularly during a period of economic uncertainty.

Advertisement

“Having businesses’ tax affairs under investigation for three, four or even five years runs counter to efforts to make the UK a more business-friendly environment,” he said. “Lengthy investigations create additional administrative and financial burdens at a time when business confidence is already fragile.”

Corporate tax disputes can be especially complex, often involving international operations, transfer pricing arrangements, and disputes over the interpretation of evolving tax legislation. These factors frequently contribute to the extended duration of investigations.

However, the data also shows that HMRC has made some progress in clearing its backlog. The tax authority closed 1,761 cases during the past year, up from 1,617 the year before.

That improvement has helped reduce the average investigation duration by four months year-on-year.

Advertisement

“HMRC does deserve credit for reducing the average time it takes to complete investigations,” Landman said. “But the fact remains that some cases remain open for more than four years, which highlights the need for additional resources if the system is to become more efficient.”

The issue has drawn increasing scrutiny from lawmakers. The Public Accounts Committee is currently conducting an inquiry into HMRC’s approach to tax compliance among large businesses.

The parliamentary investigation is examining how effectively HMRC ensures that multinational companies and major UK corporations pay the correct amount of tax, as well as whether the current investigative process strikes the right balance between enforcement and maintaining a competitive business environment.

In its call for evidence, the committee has asked businesses, advisers and experts to provide insights into how HMRC handles tax disputes with large corporations and whether improvements are needed to reduce delays and increase transparency.

Advertisement

The inquiry forms part of a wider debate about the UK’s tax enforcement system, particularly at a time when government finances remain under pressure and policymakers are seeking ways to improve compliance while maintaining the country’s attractiveness to global investors.

For many large businesses, the findings highlight the growing complexity of the UK tax landscape and the increasing importance of robust tax governance and compliance frameworks as scrutiny from regulators intensifies.


Amy Ingham

Amy is a newly qualified journalist specialising in business journalism at Business Matters with responsibility for news content for what is now the UK’s largest print and online source of current business news.

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Business

Devon Energy: Merger Deal, Iran War, Price Tailwinds

Published

on

Devon Energy: Merger Deal, Iran War, Price Tailwinds

Devon Energy: Merger Deal, Iran War, Price Tailwinds

Continue Reading

Business

Dollar steady as traders fret about escalating Iran war

Published

on

Dollar steady as traders fret about escalating Iran war


Dollar steady as traders fret about escalating Iran war

Continue Reading

Business

Asia markets brace for Trump’s promised assault on Iranian infrastructure

Published

on


Asia markets brace for Trump’s promised assault on Iranian infrastructure

Continue Reading

Business

Oil prices rise as US-Israeli war with Iran continues to disrupt supply

Published

on

Oil prices rise as US-Israeli war with Iran continues to disrupt supply
TOKYO, – Oil prices climbed on Monday on continuing fears of supply losses because of shipping disruptions in the key Middle East producing region from the U.S.-Israeli war with Iran.

Brent crude futures rose $1.71, or 1.6%, to $110.74 a barrel by 0057 GMT. U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude futures gained $0.71, or 0.6%, to trade at $112.25 per barrel.

On Thursday, the last trading day before the Good Friday holiday break, WTI ‌settled up more ⁠than 11% ⁠and Brent soared nearly 8% in volatile trading, recording their biggest absolute price increase since 2020, as U.S. President Donald Trump promised to continue attacks on Iran.

The Strait of Hormuz, which carries oil and petroleum products from Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates, remains largely closed by Iranian attacks on shipping after the war began on February 28.

Advertisement

Because of the Middle East supply disruptions, refiners are seeking alternative sources for crude, particularly for physical ⁠cargoes in ‌the U.S. and the UK North Sea.


“Global buyers are bidding aggressively for (U.S.) Gulf Coast barrels and Brent is rallying even faster,” the Schork Group said in ⁠a client note on Monday.
On Sunday, Trump ratcheted up pressure on Tehran, threatening in an expletive-laden Easter Sunday social media post to target Iran’s power plants and bridges on Tuesday if the strategic Strait of Hormuz is not reopened. Still, some vessels, including an Omani-operated tanker, a French-owned container ship and a Japanese-owned gas carrier, crossed the Strait of Hormuz since Thursday, shipping data showed, reflecting Iran’s policy to allow passage for vessels from countries it deems friendly.

The war threatens to linger on as Iran ‌has officially told mediators it is not prepared to meet with U.S. officials in the Pakistani capital Islamabad in coming days and efforts to produce a ceasefire have reached a dead end, ⁠the Wall Street Journal reported on Friday.

On Sunday, OPEC+, consisting of some members of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and allies such as Russia, agreed to a modest rise of 206,000 barrels per day for May.

However, that decision will largely exist on paper as several of the group’s key producers are unable to raise output due to the war.

Advertisement

Russian supply has been disrupted recently by Ukrainian drone attacks on its Baltic Sea export terminal. Media reports on Sunday said its Ust-Luga terminal resumed loadings on Saturday after days of disruptions.

Continue Reading

Business

How one factory in China learned to live with Trump, tariffs and turmoil

Published

on

How one factory in China learned to live with Trump, tariffs and turmoil


How one factory in China learned to live with Trump, tariffs and turmoil

Continue Reading

Business

How China fell for a lobster: What an AI assistant tells us about Beijing's ambition

Published

on

How China fell for a lobster: What an AI assistant tells us about Beijing's ambition

The AI agent sparked a frenzy of “raising lobsters” in March, with users training the tool to suit their needs.

Continue Reading

Business

Trump’s trade war with China in focus ahead of May summit

Published

on

Trump’s trade war with China in focus ahead of May summit


Trump’s trade war with China in focus ahead of May summit

Continue Reading

Business

Oil back above $110 after expletive-laden Trump threat to Iran

Published

on

Oil back above $110 after expletive-laden Trump threat to Iran

Trump wrote: “Tuesday will be Power Plant Day, and Bridge Day, all wrapped up in one, in Iran. There will be nothing like it!!! Open the Fuckin’ Strait, you crazy bastards, or you’ll be living in Hell – JUST WATCH! Praise be to Allah. President DONALD J. TRUMP”.

Continue Reading

Business

Bank stocks’ $95 billion rout may deepen on macro risks

Published

on

Bank stocks’ $95 billion rout may deepen on macro risks
More pain awaits Indian banks stocks — the biggest component of the country’s stock market — as the central bank’s moves in the currency market and growth shock to the economy from rising energy prices dent profit outlook.

The Reserve Bank of India’s defense of a record-low rupee has constrained its ability to inject liquidity, tightening financial conditions that are likely to weigh on banks over the coming quarters. A prolonged conflict in the Middle East also risks derailing India’s nascent credit recovery, threatening loan growth as the broader economy cools.

Global investors withdrew a record 327 billion rupees ($3.5 billion) from shares of financial services companies in the first fortnight of March, according to National Securities Depository Ltd. data. The Nifty Bank Index has lost $95 billion in market value since the start of March, narrowly avoiding a bear market — defined as a 20% drop from a recent high.

“There could be further pressure on these stocks in the short-to-medium term as monetary policy can remain tight,” Kranthi Bathini, an equity strategist at WealthMills Securities, said, adding that valuations are becoming attractive after the correction.

Advertisement
453177410Agencies

At stake is the outlook for India’s $4.5 trillion stock market, given banks account for nearly a third of the benchmark index. A sustained weakness in shares of lenders could undermine a broader market that is already among the worst performers in the region, down 13% for the year.


Bulls point to improving valuation multiples for bank stocks and India’s long-term economic growth, which remains among the fastest globally. The Nifty Bank Index trades at 1.5 times one-year forward price-to-book, its cheapest level since 2020, signaling an attractive risk-reward profile.
Citibank Inc. is already prioritizing private-sector banks over state-run lenders, betting that the former can better absorb the macroeconomic stress that is now the prime concern for investors.Still, Jefferies estimates banks could face as much as 50 billion rupees from unwinding their currency trades due to diktats of the central bank. Fitch Ratings sees net interest margins of lenders shrinking 20-30 basis points in the year ending March 2027 — potentially undershooting the credit rating agency’s 3.1% forecast — as tighter financial conditions weigh.

“Banks will definitely take some hit on their investment book,” said Rajat Agarwal, an Asia strategist at Societe Generale SA. “We recently saw a pickup in credit growth — what remains to be seen is how much of that gets pushed back” by the war, he said.

Continue Reading

Business

FY26 IPO performance: Only 1 in 3 delivered returns amid market volatility

Published

on

FY26 IPO performance: Only 1 in 3 delivered returns amid market volatility
ET Intelligence Group: FY26 was a challenging year for the primary equity market, with most initial public offerings (IPOs) failing to earn returns since listing till March 31 amid heightened volatility. While geopolitical tensions in West Asia and weakening rupee amid the exodus of foreign investors affected the overall equity performance, there were a select few IPOs that managed to stay in the green. Of the 109 mainboard IPOs that were listed in FY26, 32 or one out of three IPOs posted positive returns while 16 IPOs yielded double-digit returns over the listing price. This also implies that by and large, the primary equity market did not earn returns after listing.

Among the top gainers were electric bikes maker Ather Energy (139% return), auto ancillary manufacturer Belrise Industries (98%), and Aditya Infotech (78%), which provides video surveillance solutions.

Instead of listing price, if offer price is considered, then the proportion of companies improves – 37 IPOs generated returns while 31 yielded double-digit returns. The same three companies made it to the top three slots. Aditya Infotech took the lead with 168% return over the offer price while Ather Energy and Belrise gained 143% and 116%.

Only 1 in 3 IPOs Brought Cheer in FY26Agencies

In a volatile market, just 16 IPOs yielded double-digit returns over listing price

It was also the year when majority of the large IPOs based on the issue size or money raised failed to generate returns. Only a quarter of the top 12 IPOs – four to be precise – earned returns. These include Lenskart and Groww generating 26% return each, followed by 11% return by ICICI Prudential AMC and 8% by Tenneco Clean Air India.
Among the worst performing IPOs of FY26 were steel products maker VMS TMT, which fell 62% from the listing price followed by construction company Highway Infrastructure and renewable energy equipment provider Solarworld Energy Solutions which lost 60% each.

Advertisement


Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025