This article was written by

Follow

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

I may initiate a long position in any of the securities named in this piece within the next 72 hours.
I am not a registered investment adviser, broker, dealer, or tax professional. This article, including any comments or replies I post, reflects my personal opinions only and is provided for informational and educational purposes. Nothing I write is investment, legal, tax, or financial advice, or a personalized recommendation to buy, sell, hold, or short any security. My views may change without notice. Nothing I write is tailored to any reader’s objectives, financial situation, risk tolerance, or portfolio. Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal. Readers should conduct their own research and consult a qualified professional before making investment decisions.

Seeking Alpha’s Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

Users of the social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter, began reporting widespread access problems early Saturday morning, according to outage-tracking service Downdetector, which recorded a sharp spike in user complaints beginning at 3:46 a.m. Eastern time.

Downdetector, which aggregates real-time reports from users to identify potential service disruptions across websites and apps, flagged the surge in its social media post, prompting the hashtag #XTwitterDown to begin trending on the platform as affected users shared their experiences. As of Saturday morning, X had not issued a public statement addressing the reported outage, and the platform’s official developer API status page had not shown any confirmed incident, a pattern that has occurred during several of the platform’s previous disruptions this year.

Saturday’s reported outage adds to what has become a recurring pattern of service disruptions for X throughout 2026. The platform has experienced at least one notable outage roughly every month this year, according to tracking by multiple outlets, with incidents ranging from brief, localized disruptions lasting under an hour to more severe events affecting tens of thousands of users across multiple countries.

One of the year’s most significant disruptions occurred in February, when users across the United States, United Kingdom and India reported widespread access issues beginning early Monday morning. Downdetector recorded more than 40,000 user reports of problems with the platform as the outage unfolded, with the number continuing to climb throughout the morning. That February incident came not long after X owner Elon Musk announced plans to make the platform’s recommendation algorithm, including the code determining which organic and advertising posts are shown to users, fully open source, with updates to be released every four weeks alongside developer notes explaining any changes.

X has also experienced more severe, longer-lasting outages tied to issues beyond its own infrastructure. In November 2025, the platform suffered what was described as its most significant outage of that stretch, when Cloudflare, a major cloud and network services provider used by X and numerous other websites, experienced its own outage that left multiple platforms without service for several hours. Cloudflare said at the time that it did not immediately know the direct cause of the disruption affecting its network.

Other outages this year have varied in scope and duration. One incident saw reports spike suddenly around 1:45 p.m. Pacific time, surpassing 4,000 reports within the first 20 minutes, with the disruption lasting just over an hour and primarily affecting the platform’s browser-based version rather than its mobile app. During that particular incident, X’s official developer API status page never reflected any issues, remaining green throughout the disruption despite the surge in user-reported problems, a discrepancy that has become a recurring feature of how the platform’s outages are tracked and confirmed.

A separate January outage struck significant numbers of users shortly after Musk’s algorithm transparency announcement, though it remains unclear whether the two events were directly connected. In each case, the platform’s outages have tended to follow a similar pattern: a sudden spike in Downdetector reports, often numbering in the thousands within a short window, followed by a gradual decline in complaints as service is restored, typically without an official public explanation from X regarding the underlying cause.

X’s ownership structure adds another layer of scrutiny to its recurring reliability issues. Musk acquired the platform, then known as Twitter, for $44 billion in 2022, later rebranding it to X in July 2023. The service reports having up to 650 million monthly active users globally, with more than 132 million users accessing the platform daily, figures that underscore the scale of disruption even relatively brief outages can cause when they affect a meaningful share of that user base.

Common symptoms reported during X’s past outages have included persistent “Something went wrong” error messages, timelines that fail to refresh or remain stuck displaying older posts, and inconsistent access between the platform’s desktop website and its mobile applications, with one often continuing to function while the other fails entirely. Users experiencing access problems are typically advised to check both the official X Support account and third-party monitoring tools, since the platform’s own status indicators have not always reflected ongoing incidents in real time during past disruptions.

As of Saturday morning, it remained unclear how many users were affected by the reported outage, which specific features or platforms were experiencing the most significant disruption, or how long the issue might persist before service is fully restored. Given the pattern established by X’s previous outages this year, affected users may see intermittent functionality return gradually throughout the morning, though the platform’s history suggests the precise cause of Saturday’s disruption may not be publicly disclosed even after service is restored.

Users seeking updates on the status of Saturday’s reported outage were directed to monitor Downdetector’s live reporting page, along with X’s own official accounts, for further information as the situation develops. Given the frequency of similar incidents throughout 2026, technology analysts have continued to raise questions about the platform’s underlying infrastructure reliability, even as X has maintained that the vast majority of its service remains operational on a day-to-day basis despite the recurring disruptions.

BTS set a new streaming milestone this week after releasing the music video for their song “NORMAL” exclusively on Spotify, with the platform confirming Friday that the video became the most-streamed K-pop music video in a single day in Spotify’s history.

The video, released Friday at 1 p.m. Korea Standard Time, marks the latest visual from the group’s fifth studio album, “ARIRANG,” which itself became the most-streamed K-pop album in Spotify history on March 20. Spotify announced the new record on its Instagram and X accounts shortly after the video’s release, according to reporting from The Music Universe.

“NORMAL” offers what Spotify described as a deeply personal look at the seven-member group, moving between scenes captured during a late-night celebration and the quieter moments of the following morning. The video follows each member through that arc, portraying what daily life looks like for BTS when they step away from the stage and the spotlight that typically surrounds them. According to Big Hit Music, the group’s label, the setting was a deliberate creative choice intended to offer fans an unfiltered look at the band’s everyday, private side in contrast with their more polished on-stage personas.

One of the video’s most talked-about moments recreates a viral promotional image the group had teased in the lead-up to the release, showing all seven members standing in a row in front of a set of urinals with their backs to the camera. That image originated from a midnight teaser clip posted to HYBE Labels’ YouTube channel the night before the video’s release, which showed the members in the restroom setting before BTS leader RM squeezed past the group in an unguarded, comedic moment. The teaser also resolved a mystery that had been circulating online for days, tied to a series of attention-grabbing advertisements that ran earlier in July in print newspapers including the San Francisco Chronicle and the New York Post. Those ads featured the urinal-themed photo beneath a tabloid-style headline reading, “BTS Members Seen in Bathroom Amid Mysterious Gathering,” part of a broader promotional campaign that the music video ultimately brought full circle.

Alongside the video, BTS released three additional versions of “NORMAL,” including a Korean-language rendition that had first been revealed during the group’s concert in Busan, as well as an instrumental version. A physical single CD is also being made available through the Weverse platform. “NORMAL” serves as the second single from “ARIRANG,” following the album’s lead single, “SWIM,” and originally debuted at No. 41 on the Billboard Hot 100 chart dated April 4, drawing praise for its understated vocal delivery and conversational sing-rapping style.

“ARIRANG” itself has continued performing strongly on the Billboard charts in the months since its March release. The album spent three consecutive weeks atop the Billboard 200, the top albums chart in the United States, and remained at No. 25 on the chart dated July 18. “SWIM” has extended its own run on the Hot 100, sitting at No. 84 in its 16th consecutive week on that chart as of the same date.

The “NORMAL” video’s Spotify-first release continues a broader partnership between BTS and the streaming platform that began earlier this year to mark the group’s return following an extended hiatus. As part of that collaboration, Spotify hosted a series of immersive live events bringing fans, known collectively as ARMY, together in cities around the world. Among those events, BTS performed at Pier 17 in New York City in March, marking the group’s first U.S. performance in four years. Spotify also introduced in-app features tied to the album’s release, including an interactive experience called Decoding ARIRANG and a dedicated BTS Music Quiz, giving fans new ways to engage with the group’s music directly within the app.

The video’s exclusive debut on Spotify, rather than a traditional platform such as YouTube, reflects a broader strategy tied to the group’s digital footprint on the streaming service, where BTS draws roughly 35.5 million monthly listeners. The video is currently available only in select beta markets for Spotify Premium subscribers, part of the platform’s ongoing rollout of music videos as a feature alongside exclusive content such as live performances and cover recordings. Spotify noted that the “NORMAL” release followed closely behind another artist’s video exclusive on the platform, with country singer Jelly Roll launching the video for his song “Hands Up” exclusively on Spotify for 48 hours just days earlier.

The “NORMAL” video itself is set to remain a Spotify exclusive for 48 hours before becoming available on other streaming and video platforms, following the same release pattern used for the platform’s other recent artist exclusives.

BTS’s commercial dominance extends well beyond this latest record. According to Spotify, the group’s tracks appear on more than 130 million user-generated playlists on the platform, and BTS has had six songs inducted into Spotify’s Billions Club, a designation reserved for tracks that surpass one billion streams. Those songs include “Dynamite,” “My Universe,” “Butter,” “Boy With Luv” featuring Halsey, “FAKE LOVE” and “Life Goes On.” Listenership for the group spans a wide global footprint, with the United States, Japan and Peru currently ranking among the top countries streaming BTS’s music.

The group’s promotional push around “NORMAL” arrives during an active stretch on the touring front as well. BTS is currently wrapping up the European leg of its Arirang World Tour, with concerts scheduled at Paris’s Stade de France. The group is also set to make a high-profile appearance this weekend, joining Justin Bieber, Madonna and Shakira as co-headliners of the halftime show for the FIFA World Cup final, scheduled for Sunday, July 19, at MetLife Stadium in East Rutherford, New Jersey, adding another major milestone to what has already been an eventful comeback year for the group following their extended hiatus.

This article was written by

Follow

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha’s Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

This article was written by

Follow

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have a beneficial long position in the shares of NVDA, AVGO, GOOGL either through stock ownership, options, or other derivatives. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha’s Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

New air quality data released this year shows a wide gulf between the cleanest and most polluted states in the country, with sparsely populated Western and Pacific states such as Wyoming and Hawaii consistently ranking among the healthiest for air quality, while densely populated, industrial states including California, Pennsylvania and Ohio continue to post some of the worst readings in the nation.

Two separate analyses released in early 2026, using slightly different methodologies, arrived at broadly similar conclusions about which states offer the cleanest air. An analysis published in March, based on fine particulate pollution, or PM2.5, levels averaged from 2022 through 2024, found that the U.S. average stood at 8.8 micrograms per cubic meter, well above the World Health Organization’s air quality guideline of 5 micrograms per cubic meter, meaning the average American is breathing air that falls short of internationally recognized health standards.

According to that analysis, Wyoming posted the cleanest air in the country, a result researchers attributed largely to the state’s vast, sparsely populated landscape and minimal industrial development. Wyoming’s city of Casper recorded the lowest year-round particle pollution of any metro area tracked in the report, while the state capital, Cheyenne, ranked eighth overall among individual cities nationwide. Hawaii ranked second among states for particle pollution, posting a reading of 4.7 micrograms per cubic meter, a result researchers linked to the state’s low population density combined with strong prevailing winds and consistent rainfall that help disperse pollutants before they can accumulate.

At the opposite end of that same ranking, California posted the worst air quality of any state, with a reading of 11.7 micrograms per cubic meter, more than double the WHO’s recommended guideline. Researchers pointed to a combination of factors driving California’s poor performance, including high population density, a significant concentration of industrial facilities, heavy vehicle emissions, and a climate pattern that helps fuel frequent and severe wildfires across the state. Pennsylvania, Michigan, Illinois and Ohio rounded out the bottom five states in that same analysis. New York, despite its dense population and substantial industrial activity, posted a comparatively better reading of 7.8 micrograms per cubic meter, below the national average, a result researchers attributed to stricter state-level emission standards and geographic factors that help disperse pollution more effectively than some other major urban centers.

A separate ranking, compiled using a different methodology based on the U.S. News Best States framework, produced a notably different picture at the bottom of the list, though it largely agreed on the cleanest states at the top. That analysis found Hawaii posting the best average air quality index in the country, at 21.2, comfortably within the “good” range on the standard AQI scale. Honolulu was cited as one of just six U.S. cities to rank on all three of the American Lung Association’s cleanest-cities lists, covering ozone pollution, year-round particle pollution and short-term particle pollution. Alaska ranked second-best under this methodology, with an index of 29.1, despite localized particle pollution problems in areas like Anchorage and the Matanuska-Susitna Borough tied to wood-burning home heating systems, both of which have reportedly seen air quality improvements in recent years. Washington state ranked third-best, with an index of 33.5, though the analysis noted that some residents in the state still experience unhealthy air linked to emissions from power plants.

Under this second ranking system, Utah posted the worst average air quality index in the country, at 51.2, placing it in the “moderate” category on the AQI scale rather than “good.” Researchers attributed much of Utah’s poor performance to its mountainous topography, which tends to trap pollution near the surface rather than allowing it to disperse, a phenomenon sometimes referred to as a temperature inversion. The report noted that Utah has taken active steps in recent years to address the issue, including expanding solar energy use and enacting roughly 30 new regulatory rules aimed at reducing emissions from various pollution sources. Ohio and Georgia tied for the second-worst air quality under this ranking, each posting an index of 48.2, with Ohio’s reading sitting just barely within the “good” range despite the tie.

At the city level, separate rankings drawing on real-time EPA AirNow monitoring data have continued to highlight California’s Central Valley as home to some of the most consistently polluted urban areas in the country. Bakersfield has repeatedly ranked as the most polluted city in the United States in 2026 tracking, a result researchers tied to the city’s geography within the southern San Joaquin Valley, where surrounding mountains on three sides trap agricultural dust, oil refining emissions and vehicle exhaust close to the ground. Fresno, located roughly 110 miles north of Bakersfield within the same valley, faces nearly identical geographic and pollution challenges, with winter temperature inversions frequently trapping wood smoke and vehicle exhaust and pushing air quality readings above 150 on the standard index, a level considered unhealthy for the general public.

Notably, one analysis pointed out that California’s poor air quality rankings are not primarily a reflection of weak environmental regulation. The report specifically noted that California maintains the strictest air quality laws in the nation, but that the state’s unique combination of Central Valley geography, massive population size, extensive agricultural activity and wildfire exposure continues to overwhelm those regulatory efforts in terms of measurable pollution outcomes.

Beyond the state and city-level rankings, researchers have continued to emphasize the tangible health implications tied to these disparities. According to analysis comparing the cleanest and most polluted metro areas in the country, residents of the worst-ranking cities breathe air with PM2.5 concentrations three to five times higher than those living in the cleanest cities, a gap researchers say translates into measurable differences in respiratory disease rates, cardiovascular health outcomes and even overall life expectancy between regions.

With wildfire smoke, industrial emissions and regional geography continuing to shape which states and cities post the best and worst air quality readings each year, researchers say the underlying rankings are likely to remain relatively consistent from year to year, even as individual pollution events, such as this summer’s wildfire smoke drifting south from Canada, continue to produce short-term spikes in unhealthy air quality readings across parts of the country that otherwise post comparatively clean averages.

Soccer fans around the world will have multiple free options to watch Sunday’s 2026 World Cup final between Argentina and Spain, with broadcasters across dozens of countries offering the match on free-to-air television or through free streaming platforms.

The final kicks off at 3 p.m. Eastern time, 8 p.m. British time, on Sunday, July 19, at MetLife Stadium in East Rutherford, New Jersey. The match marks Argentina’s bid to become the first nation in more than six decades to win consecutive World Cup titles, while Spain seeks its second championship following its lone previous title in 2010.

In the United States, the match will air in English on Fox, with a Spanish-language broadcast available on Telemundo. Viewers with a basic TV antenna, typically costing between $20 and $30, can pick up both channels for free in most metro areas, allowing access to the final, halftime show and trophy ceremony without any monthly subscription cost. For those who have cut the cord entirely, Fox is also available through live TV streaming services including YouTube TV, Fubo, Hulu + Live TV, DirecTV and Sling, most of which offer free trial periods for new subscribers. Fox’s own streaming platform, Fox One, is priced at $19.99 a month but offers a three-day free trial, enough to catch at least part of the tournament’s coverage. Telemundo’s Spanish-language broadcast can also be streamed through Peacock, which offers an ad-supported subscription for $11 a month.

In the United Kingdom, the final will be available completely free through both the BBC and ITV. Cord-cutters can stream the match on BBC iPlayer or ITVX, with STV Player carrying the ITV feed specifically for viewers in Scotland. The BBC is additionally offering an ultra-high-definition stream through iPlayer, along with full radio commentary on BBC Radio 5 Live. Access requires only a valid UK television license and a UK-registered account.

Ireland will also carry the match free of charge, with RTE broadcasting the final with English-language commentary. Kickoff in Ireland falls at 8 p.m. local time, matching the UK broadcast window, and viewers can stream the match through the RTE Player app or website at no additional cost beyond a standard internet connection.

Australia will offer free coverage of the final through SBS On Demand, giving fans in the country access to the match without a cable or satellite subscription. In Canada, the World Cup final will be broadcast on CTV and streamed through Crave at no cost to viewers, with kickoff falling at 3 p.m. Eastern time, or 2 p.m. Central time, matching the U.S. broadcast window.

A number of other countries have also secured free-to-air rights for the final. Brazilian fans can watch the match for free through CazéTV’s YouTube channel. In Belgium, the game will be shown on RTBF and VRT. The Netherlands will carry the match on NOS, while Switzerland has multiple free options available through SRF Play, RTS Play and RSI Play, reflecting the country’s multiple language regions. Turkish viewers can access the final through TRT’s free coverage.

For fans traveling outside their home country during the final, or those hoping to access a specific national broadcast unavailable in their current location, a virtual private network, or VPN, offers one potential workaround. VPN services allow users to route their internet connection through servers located in a different country, which can make it appear as though a device is browsing from that location, potentially unlocking access to a broadcaster’s streaming platform available only within that country’s borders. Providers such as NordVPN and ExpressVPN have marketed World Cup-specific promotions around the final, often including 30-day money-back guarantees. Using a VPN is legal in most countries, though accessing a streaming service from outside its intended broadcast region may violate that platform’s terms of service, and users should be aware of the specific policies of whichever streaming service they intend to access.

One option that will not provide a live stream of the final is FIFA’s own streaming platform, FIFA+, which offers highlights and archival content but does not carry live match coverage. Live broadcasts of the final are instead handled exclusively through each country’s officially licensed broadcaster, such as Fox and Telemundo in the United States or the BBC and ITV in the United Kingdom.

Beyond the match broadcast itself, Sunday’s final will feature an extensive pregame and halftime entertainment lineup. According to reporting from Billboard, singer Jennifer Hudson is scheduled to perform the U.S. national anthem ahead of kickoff, while Nicole Scherzinger, Laura Pausini and Robbie Williams are set to perform during the pre-match ceremony, with additional appearances expected from internet personality IShowSpeed and actor Tom Cruise. The tournament’s halftime show is expected to feature performances from Madonna, Shakira, Justin Bieber and BTS, marking one of the most star-studded entertainment lineups in World Cup history.

Sunday’s championship match will be preceded by the tournament’s third-place playoff between France and England, scheduled to kick off at 5 p.m. Eastern time at Hard Rock Stadium in Miami, also airing on Fox and Telemundo in the United States.

For fans without access to any of the free broadcast options listed above, most major cable and satellite providers will carry Fox and Telemundo as part of standard programming packages in the United States, while international viewers are encouraged to check their own country’s officially licensed broadcaster for local availability, since rights holders and free-to-air arrangements vary significantly from country to country. With kickoff approaching Sunday afternoon, soccer fans across dozens of countries are expected to have some form of free or low-cost access to what promises to be one of the most closely watched World Cup finals in recent memory, pitting Lionel Messi’s push for a second consecutive title against Spain’s bid to add a second star above its crest.

New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani said this week that his administration is still weighing whether to order the arrest of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu should he travel to the city for the United Nations General Assembly in September, reviving a controversial pledge Mamdani made during his mayoral campaign.

Speaking with Lulu Garcia-Navarro on The New York Times show “The Interview,” Mamdani said he continues to believe Netanyahu should face prosecution over Israel’s conduct in Gaza. “I believe that Prime Minister Netanyahu belongs in the Hague,” Mamdani said, referring to the seat of the International Criminal Court. “He’s a war criminal who has been charged by the International Criminal Court,” Mamdani added. “And what you will find is that is an opinion that is held by many, purely because of what his actions have wrought over these last many years.”

Mamdani acknowledged uncertainty over whether he possesses the legal authority to direct the New York Police Department, which falls under his oversight as mayor, to detain a sitting foreign head of state. He said his administration remains in “an active conversation” with the city’s Law Department to determine the scope of his authority on the matter. “Whatever the law allows me to do in New York City, that’s what we will do, but we won’t be writing our own laws to that end,” Mamdani said.

The comments echo a pledge Mamdani made during his mayoral campaign last year, when he told The Times he would direct the police department to arrest Netanyahu if given the opportunity, framing the move as an effort to honor an arrest warrant issued by the International Criminal Court over Netanyahu’s role in the war in Gaza. Mamdani and a United Nations commission have both characterized the conflict as a genocide, a designation Israel has strongly disputed.

Netanyahu responded to Mamdani’s renewed comments during a recent appearance on a radio program hosted by Sid Rosenberg, a frequent critic of the mayor. Netanyahu said he was not concerned about the prospect of arrest and accused Mamdani of aligning himself with Hamas, the Palestinian militant group that controls significant portions of Gaza and carried out the October 7, 2023, attack in Israel that preceded the current war. “I think he should look at who he’s condemning, who he’s praising,” Netanyahu said. “He’s condemning Israel, the one democracy that stands shoulder to shoulder with American values.” Netanyahu went on to say, “Who does he champion? Hamas, that calls openly to massacre every Jew on earth, that conducted that horrible massacre, the worst massacre on Jews since the Holocaust.” He further claimed that Mamdani “doesn’t care” that “those who hate the Jews and Israel ultimately hate America,” adding, “And in fact I think secretly, he hates America.”

Mamdani has consistently condemned the October 7 attacks and does not speak favorably of Hamas when discussing his criticisms of Netanyahu, though he has made his concerns about Israel’s conduct in Gaza a central and recurring theme of his political identity. Associates who know him well have said he views Palestinian liberation as one of the defining moral issues of his generation.

Mamdani’s positions on Israel, once considered outside the Democratic Party’s mainstream, have gained broader traction within the party in recent months. Nearly half of House Democrats voted this week in favor of ending U.S. aid to Israel, a measure that ultimately failed to pass but signaled a notable shift in the party’s posture toward one of its longstanding allies in the Middle East. Asked about the political significance of the Gaza war, Mamdani said the issue has motivated voters nationally, including in recent House races in New York where candidates he endorsed won their elections. “It is hard to find a more bankrupt policy approach than what our country has done to Gaza and to Palestine,” he said.

The wide-ranging interview also touched on national politics, with Mamdani speaking positively about the possibility that Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, a fellow member of the Democratic Socialists of America, could run for president in 2028. “I think she’d make a good anything,” Mamdani said.

On immigration, Mamdani criticized the Trump administration’s enforcement approach while stressing that border security remains important to him. He said his administration is “willing to work with the federal government” in cases involving immigrants convicted of serious crimes, but drew a firm line against broader cooperation. “What we are unwilling to do is to participate in civil immigration enforcement with a federal government that has said openly it wants to deport a vast majority of people for crimes that we will never even know,” he said.

Mamdani also defended his police commissioner, Jessica Tisch, against criticism from some fellow democratic socialists, crediting her with helping to reduce crime in the city, even as some of his own supporters have raised concerns about the frequency of low-level arrests conducted under her leadership.

The mayor addressed the media attention surrounding his wife, artist Rama Duwaji, who has largely stayed out of the public eye during his time in office but has faced criticism over past social media activity, including liking a post that celebrated Hamas’s October 7 attack. “She is her own person,” Mamdani said. “She’s an incredible artist, and yet so much of how she engages with the world today is framed through her being my wife.”

Mamdani also reflected on how he defines economic struggle in a city with a high cost of living, an issue central to his political rise. Asked whether someone earning $250,000 annually could be considered working class, he said he had not set a specific income threshold, instead focusing on people’s ability to afford basic necessities. “What I would say is those who are working to try and afford the basic dignities of life and aren’t able to do so, I think that that is also working class,” he said. When pressed on whether that framing could group a janitor with a lawyer, Mamdani said he was less concerned with rigid definitions than with a broader question facing residents: “Is there any way for them to actually be able to work this hard and afford a good life in the city?”

Reflecting on his rapid rise to national political prominence, Mamdani offered a candid assessment of the mindset required for the role. “I think there is some level of absurdity that you have to have as a part of yourself to believe that it should be you,” he said.