TUCSON, Ariz. — Three months after 84-year-old Nancy Guthrie vanished from her Catalina Foothills home in a suspected nighttime abduction, investigators continue to pursue leads with no arrests, no confirmed suspects and no definitive answers about her fate, even as new DNA analysis offers a glimmer of hope in the high-profile case.
Nancy Guthrie & Savannah Guthrie
Nancy Guthrie, mother of NBC “Today” show co-anchor Savannah Guthrie, was reported missing on Feb. 1 after family members grew concerned when she failed to attend church services. Authorities believe she was taken from her bedroom in the early morning hours of Feb. 1, around 2:30 a.m., when her pacemaker lost connection to her phone, indicating it had moved out of range.
Evidence at the scene pointed strongly to foul play. Investigators found blood on the front porch, a back door propped open and doorbell camera footage showing a masked individual tampering with the device shortly before the disappearance. Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos has repeatedly stated he believes Nancy Guthrie was abducted against her will.
Ongoing Investigation Enters Fourth Month
As of early May 2026, the search has stretched into its fourth month with no major breakthroughs. The Pima County Sheriff’s Department, working closely with the FBI, describes the investigation as “active and ongoing,” with hundreds of tips received and analyzed.
Advertisement
“The investigation into the disappearance of Nancy Guthrie remains active and ongoing,” a sheriff’s department spokesperson said in a recent statement. No motive has been publicly identified, and authorities have not named any suspects.
Forensic efforts continue. In mid-April, reports emerged that the FBI is analyzing hair and potential DNA samples collected from the home in February. Sources familiar with the probe told outlets that advanced laboratory techniques are being used in hopes of generating a usable profile that could identify whoever entered the residence.
Sheriff’s officials later clarified that while analysis is ongoing, no dramatic new evidence has suddenly emerged. Private labs and federal partners continue sharing data, but results have not yet yielded a breakthrough.
Family’s Anguish and Million-Dollar Reward
Advertisement
Savannah Guthrie, who stepped away from her “Today” duties for several weeks following her mother’s disappearance, has returned to the show while remaining deeply involved in appeals for information. In late February, the family offered a $1 million reward for details leading to Nancy’s safe recovery.
In a emotional video statement, Savannah addressed the public directly, expressing both hope and the painful reality that her mother might no longer be alive. “We will pay” for credible information, she emphasized, while acknowledging the family’s understanding of the grim possibilities.
The family has endured additional torment from multiple ransom notes sent to media outlets, including TMZ. These communications claimed various scenarios, such as Nancy being taken to Mexico, but authorities have not confirmed their legitimacy. Former FBI agents described the tactic of routing demands through the press as highly unusual and potentially indicative of hoaxers or opportunists.
Savannah has spoken publicly about the toll, including conversations with her brother suggesting the abduction could be linked to her own public profile. She expressed regret over any way her celebrity might have drawn unwanted attention to her mother.
Advertisement
Chilling Details Emerge
The case has captivated national attention due to its puzzling circumstances. Nancy Guthrie lived in the same home for decades in an upscale neighborhood north of Tucson. She was described as active in her church community and independent despite her age.
Surveillance video released by authorities showed the masked figure at the door. Other footage from earlier that day captured Nancy in an Uber, marking what may have been her final known movements. Neighbors reported no unusual activity beforehand, adding to the mystery.
Experts, including former FBI profilers and “Mindhunter”-style analysts, have speculated on possible motives. Some suggest a simple ransom kidnapping gone wrong, with the perpetrator possibly someone known to Nancy or familiar with the area. Others have raised questions about whether the abduction was staged, though law enforcement has not endorsed that theory.
Advertisement
Forensic psychologist and clinical researchers have pointed to signs that the suspect likely had some prior interaction with the victim or scouted the home. Multiple people may have been involved, officials have not ruled out.
Broader Search Efforts and Community Response
The investigation has involved extensive ground searches, aerial support and coordination with federal agencies. False leads, including vehicle searches and detentions, have come and gone without resolution. Calls have grown for specialized volunteer groups, such as the Cajun Navy, to assist in desert areas, though official responses have been measured.
The case has highlighted challenges in missing persons investigations involving elderly victims, especially when celebrity connections amplify public interest but also complicate leads with hoaxes and speculation.
Advertisement
Nancy’s pacemaker data and other digital evidence have been crucial in narrowing the timeline. Blood found at the scene underwent testing, though full results have not been publicly detailed.
Expert Opinions and Theories
Retired FBI agents and criminologists have offered varied analyses. One former official described the motive as potentially “simple” — a ransom attempt where the victim may not have survived, followed by taunting communications to prolong family suffering. Others note the absence of clear proof of life as a troubling sign.
Speculation about family involvement has circulated online but was firmly rejected by authorities, who have cleared close relatives.
Advertisement
As the case approaches 100 days, some observers worry it could drift toward cold case status, though officials insist resources remain dedicated. A television special examining the mystery is scheduled to air in early May.
What Comes Next
Investigators continue sifting through tips and awaiting lab results. The FBI offers its own reward of up to $100,000. Anyone with information is urged to contact the Pima County Sheriff’s Department or the FBI.
For the Guthrie family, each day without answers brings renewed pain. Savannah has balanced professional responsibilities with private grief, occasionally sharing updates that underscore the human cost behind the headlines.
Advertisement
Nancy Ellen Long Guthrie, born in 1942 in Kentucky, remains a beloved figure to her family and community. Her disappearance has left an 84-year-old void that no amount of media coverage can fill.
The case serves as a stark reminder of vulnerabilities even in seemingly safe neighborhoods. As summer approaches in the Arizona desert, concerns grow about evidence preservation and the chances of locating Nancy alive.
Authorities and the family plead for the public’s help. In a case marked by more questions than answers, one breakthrough — whether from DNA, a credible tip or new footage — could finally bring resolution to a mystery that has gripped the nation.
The Finals MVP award, known as the Bill Russell Trophy, carries special prestige because it is awarded exclusively to a champion — with one notable exception in 1969 when Jerry West won it despite a loss. This year’s matchup between two star-driven teams offers multiple candidates capable of claiming the honor alongside the Larry O’Brien Trophy.
Wembanyama stands as the clear frontrunner on most MVP ladders entering the series. The 22-year-old Spurs phenom has dominated the postseason with averages of 23.2 points, 10.8 rebounds and 3.5 blocks per game. His two-way impact, combining elite rim protection with perimeter shooting, positions him to control the outcome of games on both ends of the floor.
Few players reach the NBA Finals by their third season, a feat accomplished by legends such as Tim Duncan, Magic Johnson and Larry Bird. Wembanyama joins that rare group through a combination of extraordinary talent, basketball IQ and competitive drive. His defensive presence alone forces opponents to alter shots and attack strategies, particularly around the rim where his length and timing disrupt even the most skilled finishers.
Advertisement
Offensively, Wembanyama has elevated his game in high-stakes moments. He averaged 27.3 points in the Western Conference finals and showed willingness to take — and make — critical three-pointers. His ability to finish lobs and stretch the floor creates matchup nightmares for the Knicks, who must decide how to contain him without sacrificing help defense elsewhere.
Brunson ranks a close second in the MVP conversation. The Knicks guard has posted strong playoff numbers of 26.9 points, 6.6 assists and steady leadership. Despite his listed height of 6-foot-2, Brunson overcomes physical limitations with exceptional skill, vision and clutch performance. His ability to create shots from all angles and make smart decisions under pressure has propelled New York to this stage.
Brunson’s signature moments include explosive fourth quarters and overtime heroics, such as his dominant display in Game 1 of the Eastern Conference finals against Cleveland. That resilience and big-shot capability make him a proven winner who thrives when games tighten in the Finals.
Karl-Anthony Towns provides the Knicks with a vital third option on the MVP ladder. The big man contributes consistent double-doubles, averaging 16.9 points and 10.6 rebounds in the playoffs, along with an improved 5.9 assists. His shooting range and size create spacing that complements Brunson’s drives, while his passing from the high post has added a new dimension to New York’s offense.
Advertisement
Towns faces a formidable challenge matching up against Wembanyama. The Knicks plan to rotate defenders, but Towns’ ability to pull the Spurs center away from the paint with his perimeter shooting will be crucial. His consistency on the glass and willingness to adapt his game have been key factors in New York’s playoff success.
Stephon Castle emerges as a dark horse candidate for the Spurs. The 21-year-old guard has shown remarkable maturity, posting 19.2 points, 4.9 rebounds and 6.7 assists per game in the postseason. His growth has been evident in reduced turnovers and increased aggression on both ends. Castle’s defense against primary ball handlers, including his containment of top scorers in earlier rounds, could prove decisive against Brunson.
OG Anunoby rounds out the top five on the ladder. The Knicks forward delivers elite two-way production at 19.7 points and 6.9 rebounds per game. His versatility allows him to score effectively while providing strong perimeter and help defense. Anunoby’s strength and positioning could see him assigned to Wembanyama at times, using physicality to limit the big man’s effectiveness in the paint — reminiscent of past Finals standouts like Andre Iguodala.
The depth of talent on both rosters creates uncertainty around the eventual MVP. Additional candidates include Dylan Harper, Devin Vassell and De’Aaron Fox for San Antonio, and Josh Hart and Mikal Bridges for New York. Each brings specific strengths that could shine in a long series.
Advertisement
The Knicks-Spurs matchup features contrasting styles. San Antonio relies on Wembanyama’s generational talent and a young, athletic supporting cast. New York counters with Brunson’s craftiness, Towns’ versatility and a tough, defensive-minded group. The series outcome likely hinges on which star imposes his will most effectively across multiple games.
Historical precedents show the Finals MVP often goes to the player who delivers the most memorable performances in decisive moments. While superstars usually claim the award, role players have surprised in the past when their contributions prove pivotal in a championship run.
Wembanyama’s defensive dominance gives him a slight edge in projections. His ability to alter shots and protect the rim could neutralize New York’s interior attacks, forcing the Knicks into difficult mid-range and perimeter shots. If he pairs that with efficient scoring, the trophy could be his to lose.
Brunson counters with proven playoff pedigree and leadership. His experience carrying a team through tough stretches and delivering in clutch situations makes him dangerous. Should the series extend deep and New York prevails, Brunson’s consistency and big moments could sway voters.
Advertisement
Towns’ evolution into a more complete player adds intrigue. His expanded passing and continued rebounding provide balance. Success for the Knicks may require him to stretch the floor and limit Wembanyama’s paint touches.
Castle represents the potential for youth to steal the spotlight. His poise and two-way contributions have already exceeded expectations. A strong series defensively against Brunson combined with scoring bursts could elevate his candidacy.
Anunoby’s value lies in quiet excellence. Even on nights when his shot is off, his defensive assignments and rebounding keep him impactful. His potential to guard Wembanyama effectively could mirror past defensive masterpieces that earned Finals MVP honors.
As the series begins, focus remains on execution over seven games. Factors such as home-court advantage, injuries, officiating and adjustments will influence individual performances. Both teams have shown resilience throughout the playoffs, suggesting a competitive battle.
Advertisement
The NBA Finals MVP race adds narrative depth to an already compelling series. Fans and analysts will track every statistic and moment as candidates vie for the ultimate individual prize in a team sport. With two franchises seeking their next championship chapter, the spotlight on these five players — and others — will intensify with each game.
Observers note the rarity of such young talent colliding at this stage. Wembanyama and Castle highlight San Antonio’s bright future, while Brunson, Towns and Anunoby represent New York’s contention window. The winner of this series and its MVP will likely shape league conversations for years ahead.
As tip-off approaches, the basketball world awaits a series that promises drama, standout performances and, ultimately, one player hoisting both trophies in celebration of a championship run.
Lord Abbett is an independent, privately held, global asset manager and one of the oldest money management firms in the United States. They manage assets across a full range of U.S. mutual funds, UCITS funds, institutional and separately managed accounts for clients around the world. Note: This account is not managed or monitored by Lord Abbett, and any messages sent via Seeking Alpha will not receive a response. For inquiries or communication, please use Lord Abbett’s official channels.
The shares of NHPC jumped more than 5% as the offer for sale (OFS) through which the government is selling up to 6% stake in the company opens for retail investors today, after an overwhelming response from non-retail investors on the first day of subscription.
The government on Tuesday decided to exercise the green shoe option in the 6% stake sale in NHPC after the OFS was oversubscribed 3.47 times on the first day. “Offer for Sale in NHPC Limited received enthusiastic response from investors and was oversubscribed 3.47 times on the first day. Allocation will be on a price priority basis. The government has decided to exercise the entire green shoe option. Retail investors and employees get to bid on 3rd June 2026,” Department of Investment and Public Asset Management (DIPAM) Secretary Arunish Chawla said in a post on X.
Advertisement
Offer for Sale in NHPC Limited received enthusiastic response from investors and was over subscribed 3.47 times on the first day. Allocation will be on price priority basis.
Government has decided to exercise the entire green shoe option. Retail investors and employees get to… pic.twitter.com/tK9cwzplwT
NHPC announced on Monday that the government aims to sell 3% of the company’s total paid-up equity capital as part of the base offer, along with an oversubscription option to sell an additional 30 crore shares, taking the total potential offer size to 60.27 crore shares or 6% equity. At the floor price of Rs 71 per share, this would be worth more than Rs 4,279 crore.The shares of NHPC had crashed over 6% on Tuesday as the OFS floor price of Rs 71 per share implied a discount of nearly 8% to Monday’s closing price, weighing on investor sentiment. However, the strong interest from institutional investors may have boosted confidence.
Advertisement
Live Events
The government owned more than 67% stake in the PSU company as of March 31, 2026. The share sale by its promoter is being conducted through a separate window mechanism on BSE and the National Stock Exchange in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Board of India’s OFS guidelines. NHPC’s OFS comes days after the government divested some of its stake in state-run miner Coal India through an offer for sale at a floor price of Rs 412 per share. The government owned more than 63% stake in the PSU company as on March 31, 2026. Also Read |NHPC shares tumble 5% as govt’s OFS worth up to Rs 4,300 crore opens at 8% discount. Check details
NHPC share price
NHPC shares have fallen around 7% in one week and 9% in one month. The stock is down more than 5% in 2026 so far. In the longer term, the shares of the PSU have fallen 12% in one year, but gained more than 74% in three years and 190% in five years.The company currently has a market capitalisation of more than Rs 75,709 crore. The stock’s P/E ratio stands at 17.
What lies ahead for NHPC shares?
For a long term, dividend oriented investor comfortable with a low yield utility, the entry at a discount is attractive, said Abhinav Tiwari, Research Analyst at Bonanza. NHPC’s earnings can be lumpy and seasonal (hydro depends on water flows), capex is heavy and project timelines often slip, he added.
“The stock does not appear particularly cheap on current valuations. However, the Rs. 71 level provides a reasonable margin of safety, as it is close to the stock’s 52-week low and limits downside risk relative to the current market price. Although its expanding project pipeline and capacity additions are positive long term drivers, current valuations already factor in a strong recovery. Returns will depend heavily on successful execution and improvement in operational profitability,” the analyst further said.
Advertisement
Technical view on NHPC
Virat Jagad, Senior Technical Research Analyst at Bonanza, said the NHPC’s recent sharp decline on exceptionally high volumes suggests aggressive selling activity and a breakdown of short-term support near Rs 78. He placed the immediate support near Rs 72–73, while resistance is seen around Rs 78–80.
“A sustained move above Rs 80 would be required to improve the technical outlook and open the possibility of a recovery towards Rs 84–86,” he added. (Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)
The Bank of England is encouraging people to choose their favourites
08:31, 03 Jun 2026Updated 08:44, 03 Jun 2026
The European hedgehog is among the mammals that could feature on future banknotes(Image: Viktoria Danielova / Pexels)
The British public is being asked to pick their favourite mammals, birds, amphibians, insects and fish to appear on future banknotes. A buff-tailed bumblebee, European hedgehog and barn owl are among the creatures that could feature under plans by the Bank of England.
The central bank is working with a panel of wildlife experts from across the UK on the new design, which follows a public consultation last year. The shortlisted critters are all native to the UK and could be used on £5, £10, £20 and £50 notes.
Advertisement
“We are keen to hear your views, which will be an important consideration in making our final decision on the design,” the Bank of England said.
“The denominations (£5, £10, £20, £50) will need to be easy to tell apart. It is important that there are four distinct animals across all four denominations and that they represent different environments from across the UK.”
The list has been grouped into three categories, which cover a variety of species and environments. Members of the public can choose up to two animals from each category.
The mammals
bottlenose dolphin
brown hare
European hedgehog
grey seal
pine martin
red fox
The birds
Atlantic puffin
barn owl
common kingfisher
Eurasian curlew
great spotted woodpecker
white-tailed eagle
The amphibians, insects and fish
Atlantic salmon
basking shark
buff-tailed bumblebee
common frog
Emperor dragonfly
marsh fritillary butterfly
The bank said it may not necessarily choose the four animals that receive the highest number of responses. Andrew Bailey, the bank’s governor, will make the final decision while “taking into account” the public’s feedback.
“I very much hope the public will enjoy engaging in our consultation to choose the animals to feature on our next series of banknotes,” said Victoria Cleland, the bank’s chief cashier.
Advertisement
“The shortlisted animals demonstrate the rich variety of wildlife we have to celebrate in the UK.”
It will be a number of years before the next series of notes is launched. It is a detailed, multi-year process to design, test and print the notes, ensuring they are high-quality, resilient, accessible and incorporate the latest anti-counterfeiting technology.
The next series will still include a portrait of the monarch. Representation of the Home Nations will also be an important feature in the design, the Bank of England said. Mackerel, red squirrels, otters and osprey already feature on Royal Bank of Scotland banknotes.
The outcome will be announced at the end of 2026.
Advertisement
The public can vote via the consultation form, by emailing enquiries@bankofengland.co.uk or writing to Banknote Imagery Consultation, Notes Directorate, Bank of England, Threadneedle Street, London, EC2R 8AH.
Shares of IndusInd Bank dropped over 3% on Wednesday after a fresh whistleblower complaint was sent to the Prime Minister’s Office and several regulators, including the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), seeking an investigation into alleged insider trading, governance failures, and shortcomings in forensic and audit reviews at the private lender.
The complaint, a copy of which was seen by The Economic Times, was also sent to the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO), National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) and other agencies. The shares of the private lender tumbled to Rs 884.05 apiece on Wednesday morning after the report.
The whistleblower alleged insider trading by Samir Agarwal, former zonal head of eastern India at IndusInd Bank, along with manipulation of financial records, evergreening of microfinance loans, suppression of audit findings, and attempts by senior management and board members to conceal irregularities. It was alleged that Agarwal generated gains of around Rs 46 crore via share transactions worth nearly Rs 815 crore by family members and related entities using confidential information just before key developments became public.
IndusInd Bank rejects whistleblower’s claims
Responding to The Economic Times’ queries, IndusInd Bank said that it “rejects the assertions” made by the whistleblower, adding that all concerns have been “duly examined” and “appropriate actions” taken in line with internal policies and regulatory requirements. It said it had proactively reported certain matters to authorities and, with the matter under review, it would not comment further.
Advertisement
This comes after the bank last year disclosed issues related to the accounting of internal derivative trades, sending the stock to a tailspin and resulting in several managerial exits including then CEO Sumant Kathpalia.
IndusInd Bank share price
IndusInd Bank shares have fallen around 5% in one week and more than 3% in one week. The stock has gained around 11% in one month, but declined over 31% in three years and 12% in five years.
The private bank currently has a market capitalisation of nearly Rs 68,947 crore. The stock’s P/E ratio stands at around 80x.
Live Events
(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)
You must be logged in to post a comment Login