This article was written by

Follow

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha’s Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

Link-building marketplaces cut out many of these steps by giving buyers access to publishers in one place, along with information they can check before ordering a placement.

Some marketplaces are mainly built around guest posts, while others also offer niche edits, sponsored content and other SEO services. The choice of publishers, available data, countries covered and level of control can also vary considerably from one platform to another.

This review looks at ten link-building marketplaces and what each one offers. We compare how easy it is to find relevant websites, what buyers can check before placing an order, the types of links available and the tools provided for managing campaigns.

Quick Comparison of Link-Building Marketplaces

Marketplace figures and features are based on information published by the companies and were checked in September 2026. Inventory can change as publishers join or leave.

1. PressWhizz

PressWhizz is an AI-powered link-building marketplace with more than 72,000 curated websites across 90+ countries. The network covers a wide range of niches and languages, with guest posts and more than 31,000 niche-edit opportunities available. Buyers can filter publishers and check Moz and Ahrefs metrics, traffic data, referring domains and prices before ordering. They choose the publisher, target page and anchor text themselves, which gives them control over where each link is placed.

Search goes beyond publisher profiles. Content Search covers more than 30 million indexed pages and can find existing articles related to a keyword or subject. This is useful for niche edits because buyers can search for a relevant article directly rather than checking suitable websites one by one. Ranking Keywords offers another option by finding publishers already ranking for terms related to the target page.

For teams managing several websites or clients, Projects keeps campaigns separate, while Match Domains shows whether a publisher has already linked to a particular domain. Marketplace placements also come with a 12-month guarantee. If a link disappears during that period, PressWhizz says it will contact the publisher to restore it. If that is not possible, the buyer receives a full refund.

Where PressWhizz Stands Out

The main advantage is the amount of work that can be done from one account. Standard publisher filters are supported by Content Search and Ranking Keywords, while Projects and Match Domains help with ongoing campaigns. This gives regular link buyers useful tools for both finding new placements and keeping track of existing work. A managed link-building service is also available for businesses that want more support. For those who prefer to manage their own campaigns, the combination of a large publisher network, detailed website data, clear pricing, buyer control and dedicated research tools makes PressWhizz the strongest overall marketplace in this review.

Best for: SEO agencies, affiliate teams, in-house SEO teams and businesses that buy links regularly.

2. Linkatomic

Smaller teams may only need an easy way to find a suitable website and arrange a sponsored article. Linkatomic keeps the process fairly simple, with newspapers, blogs and other websites available through its marketplace. Buyers can filter the available sites by topic, country, language, price and website metrics. Once they find a suitable option, they choose the publisher themselves rather than having a placement selected for them.

Buyers can provide their own article or have the content prepared through the service. Publishers from different countries and languages are available, so Linkatomic can also be used for campaigns targeting more than one market. There are fewer tools to work through than on some larger marketplaces, which may suit teams that mainly want to find a publisher, place an order and move on.

Best for: Smaller SEO teams, occasional sponsored articles and campaigns targeting different languages or countries.

3. PRPosting

Buyers who like to check website data before ordering will find plenty of it on PRPosting. Publisher listings can include Ahrefs figures for DR, traffic, backlinks, referring domains and organic keywords, along with Moz and Similarweb data. The marketplace covers publishers from different countries, with separate sections for local markets. Buyers can compare the available websites themselves and choose individual placements rather than buying a package of preselected links.

With more data shown in the listings than on some simpler marketplaces, PRPosting is better suited to buyers who already know which SEO metrics they want to check. Those looking for a very basic way to order a guest post may find that level of detail less important.

Best for: SEO professionals who want to compare publisher data before ordering and teams working across different countries.

4. Accessily

Guest-post buyers can use Accessily to browse websites that are open to paid content and arrange placements without contacting publishers individually. Publishers list their own websites, set their prices and approve the content submitted for publication. Accessily says its marketplace includes more than 10,000 publisher sites, with a wider community of more than 3,000 publishers. The platform also has tools for publishers, including hosting, monetisation and payouts, although these are less relevant to someone using it mainly to buy backlinks.

For buyers, the marketplace offers a fairly direct way to find websites accepting guest posts and order a placement. It does not have the same range of research and campaign tools found on some larger platforms, but not every buyer will need them.

Best for: Buyers looking for a straightforward guest-post marketplace with direct access to publisher listings.

5. Adsy

Buyers can use Adsy to search for websites, apply filters and choose where their content will be published. The marketplace currently advertises more than 150,000 websites across 150+ countries, 100 languages and 50 categories. More than 20 filters are available, including Ahrefs traffic and DR, Moz DA, country and other website data. This helps buyers narrow down a large inventory before checking individual sites more closely.

For teams placing links regularly, websites can be saved in custom lists and orders tracked through the buyer account. Agencies can also create projects and download reports for completed work. Adsy monitors published content as well, so buyers can keep track of placements after they go live. With so many websites available, some research is still needed before ordering. The filters make that process easier, particularly for buyers searching across several countries or niches.

Best for: Buyers who want a large international selection and plenty of filters for finding guest-post opportunities.

6. GUESTPOSTLINKS

Buyers who want to choose their own publishers can browse more than 65,000 verified options on GUESTPOSTLINKS. Websites can be filtered by niche, country, language, organic traffic, price and authority metrics, with data from Ahrefs, Moz and Semrush also available. Both guest posts and niche edits can be ordered through the platform. Buyers provide their target URL and anchor details, then either supply their own content or have it written through the service. Larger orders and white-label reporting are also available for agencies. Link duration is worth checking before placing an order. The terms can vary between publishers, and replacements are not guaranteed in every case, so buyers should review the conditions for the website they choose.

Best for: Agencies looking for guest posts and niche edits, with the option to place larger orders and choose publishers themselves.

7. iCopify

Smaller sites and SEO teams working with limited budgets can use iCopify to search for guest-post opportunities at different price levels. Buyers can compare websites by niche, country, DR, DA, organic traffic and price before placing an order. The marketplace advertises a large international selection covering more than 150 countries. Its published inventory figures vary across different parts of the site, so the exact number of available websites may change over time.

Orders are handled through the platform. Buyers provide the article, target URL, anchor text and any other instructions, then receive the live URL once the placement is complete. Content can also be ordered for campaigns where the buyer does not already have an article prepared. With a broad range of prices and international websites, iCopify is mainly suited to buyers who want plenty of options without starting with a large budget.

Best for: Smaller budgets, international guest posting and buyers who want to compare websites at different price points.

8. Linkhouse

Teams working across Poland and other European markets can use Linkhouse to find both guest posts and links in existing articles. The platform currently advertises more than 65,000 websites worldwide, including more than 26,000 Polish portals. Buyers can check prices and SEO data before ordering, then use filters to narrow down the available websites. Linkhouse also includes tools such as Backlink Gap, along with features for planning, ordering and tracking campaigns. The large selection of Polish websites makes Linkhouse particularly useful for campaigns in Poland, while its international inventory provides options for teams working across other European markets as well.

Best for: Polish and European campaigns, especially teams looking for both guest posts and links in existing content.

9. Backlinked

Teams looking for backlinks in Germany, Austria or Switzerland may prefer a marketplace with a stronger selection of German-language websites. Backlinked is based in Germany and offers both self-service link buying and managed link-building services. The marketplace advertises more than 100,000 publishing opportunities. Buyers can search websites by industry, language and common SEO metrics, then choose where they want their links placed.

Guest-post content can be provided by the buyer or written by Backlinked’s editorial team. Orders and projects are managed through the platform, while businesses that do not want to choose placements themselves can use the managed service instead. Its focus on the DACH region makes Backlinked especially relevant for teams that regularly need German-language placements, although international websites are available as well.

Best for: German-language campaigns and teams that want the choice between self-service and managed link building.

10. Getfluence

Some campaigns need more than a standard guest post. Getfluence gives brands access to sponsored articles, branded content and other forms of paid media coverage, alongside the SEO value these placements may provide. Its publisher community currently includes more than 70,000 publishers, which advertisers can browse after creating an account. Buyers can provide their own article or have content prepared through the platform.

Getfluence also labels selected media outlets as Trusted Publishers, using factors including completed collaborations, response rates and publication rates. This gives buyers some extra information when comparing publishers. The platform is a better match for campaigns that combine backlinks with wider brand exposure than for buyers who simply want an occasional SEO placement.

Best for: Brands looking for sponsored content, media coverage and backlinks as part of the same campaign.

Choosing a Marketplace Based on the Way You Build Links

The number of websites in a marketplace does not tell the whole story. A platform with 100,000 sites is not necessarily more useful than one with 50,000 if buyers have to spend too much time finding publishers that actually fit their campaign. What matters more is how easily buyers can search the available websites, compare suitable options and find the right placements.

Which Marketplace Offers the Most Complete Setup?

The ten marketplaces in this review suit different types of link-building campaigns. Linkatomic keeps sponsored-post buying simple, while PRPosting provides plenty of publisher data. Accessily focuses mainly on guest posts, and Adsy has a large international selection with many filters. GUESTPOSTLINKS and iCopify cover different budgets and campaign sizes, while Linkhouse and Backlinked are useful for European markets. Getfluence is more focused on sponsored content and media coverage.

PressWhizz takes the top position because it gives buyers a large choice of publishers along with the tools needed to research and manage their placements. Teams can compare publisher data, search for relevant existing content, order guest posts or niche edits and manage different campaigns from the same platform.

These tools become especially useful for agencies and SEO teams working on several campaigns at once. They can keep track of their work and find new publishers without giving up control over where their links are placed. For teams that buy links regularly, PressWhizz offers the most complete marketplace in this review. It cuts down the time spent finding and arranging placements while leaving the final choice of publisher with the buyer.

Alongside the familiar national providers, a growing number of smaller network builders, often called alt-nets, are offering their own full fibre broadband deals. The result is a choice that can feel welcome, but also harder to read at a glance.

The basic question is simple: do the smaller providers actually offer something better, or do they just look better on paper? For households comparing monthly bills, speeds and contract terms, that question matters more than brand recognition. A cheaper headline price means little if service falls short when it is needed most.

Big telecom companies still have the advantage of scale. Their networks cover far more homes, their customer service systems are more established, and their packages are easier to find.

Alt-nets, meanwhile, tend to focus on specific areas and promise a more direct route to full fibre, which can be appealing for people stuck on slower lines.

What alt-nets usually bring to the table

Alt-net is a broad label, but the common thread is that these companies build their own fibre infrastructure rather than relying entirely on legacy copper networks. That matters because a full fibre connection can deliver faster downloads, lower latency and better performance when several people are online at once. In practical terms, that can make video calls steadier and gaming less frustrating.

The appeal is not only technical. Smaller operators often market themselves as more responsive, with shorter support chains and fewer layers between the customer and the network owner. For someone who has spent weeks chasing a fault report, that promise can sound refreshing. Does it always play out that way? Not necessarily, but the idea has traction for a reason.

Alt-nets also tend to enter areas where competition has been thin. That can put pressure on the larger providers to improve pricing or speed up upgrades. In a street-by-street market, one new network can change the conversation quickly, especially if neighbours start asking why they are still paying for older technology.

Where big telecom still has the edge

Large telecom brands are not standing still. They usually have broader coverage, more bundles and clearer options for households that want broadband, mobile and TV on one bill. For many customers, that convenience still outweighs the appeal of a newer name.

There is also a practical point about reliability of rollout. A national operator may already have fibre available in one form or another across a large part of the country, while an alt-net may only serve selected streets. If your postcode is covered, switching looks easy. If not, the choice is made for you before you even start comparing tariffs.

Customer experience is more mixed than either side would like to admit. Large providers can be slow to resolve complaints, but they also have bigger support structures and more mature escalation processes. Smaller networks may feel more personal, yet a local fault can be just as frustrating if the team is under-resourced or still scaling up.

The real costs are not always in the headline price

When people compare broadband offers, they often focus on the monthly fee. That is understandable, but it misses a few details that matter over the life of the contract. Installation charges, contract length, in-contract rises and router quality can all affect the total cost.

Some alt-nets attract attention with sharp introductory pricing. Once the promotion ends, the bill can move closer to what larger providers charge. Big telecom firms do the same thing, though they may also offer other services that soften the blow for families already buying from the same group. The headline number is only the opening line.

Another factor is flexibility. A shorter contract may suit renters or people expecting to move. A longer one might be fine for homeowners who want certainty and do not plan to change addresses soon. The best full fibre broadband deal is not necessarily the fastest or the cheapest, but the one that fits the household’s habits.

Who gains most from switching?

Households still on older broadband are the most obvious winners if an alt-net reaches their street. Full fibre can be a clear improvement, especially for homes with several users streaming, downloading and working at the same time. A flat that shares one connection between remote workers and students will feel the difference quickly.

Some customers also switch for service reasons rather than speed alone. If a provider has been slow to fix faults or unclear about price rises, the temptation to move is strong. Brand loyalty weakens fast when support calls keep ending in the same scripted answers.

For others, staying put may be the better move. If your current package already performs well and the switching process would bring early termination fees or installation disruption, the gain may be too small to justify the hassle. Not every household needs to chase the newest network just because it exists.

What readers should check before deciding

A careful comparison should start with coverage, because availability determines everything else. Then comes the upload speed, which can be overlooked when consumers only look at download figures. Anyone who sends large files, backs up photos or works from home will want that number to be realistic.

It also helps to read the small print on price rises and exit fees. Promotions can look attractive until the second year arrives. One useful question is whether the provider has a genuine track

record in the area, rather than a launch promise that sounds good but has not yet been tested at scale.

That is where the alt-net versus big telecom debate becomes more grounded. The decision is not about ideology or brand preference. It comes down to whether the local network, the contract terms and the support setup match the way people actually use the internet at home.

Why the choice is getting sharper

Competition in broadband is no longer just about faster speeds. It is about who can deliver a stable service at a fair price, with enough clarity that customers know what they are signing up for. Smaller networks have pushed that issue onto the table, and larger firms have had to respond.

The market is likely to stay uneven for a while. Some areas will have several fibre options, while others will still depend on a single dominant provider. For readers trying to decide whether switching is worth it, the answer will depend less on the logo on the router and more on what happens after the engineer leaves the driveway.

Josh Payne, the 32-year-old founder of British data centre start-up Nscale, is in line for performance-related share payments worth up to $350m (£260m) after the company floats in New York, according to its prospectus.

The document, released on Friday night, said the package was designed to ensure Payne’s “continued long-term alignment” with shareholders. Nscale is targeting a valuation of about $35bn (£26bn) as demand grows for the computing power that underpins artificial intelligence.

How the award is structured

The potential share-based payments account for about 2.5 per cent of Nscale’s share capital, according to the prospectus. They will vest in stages between 2028 and 2032 if the company hits various targets.

The company said 40 per cent of the shares will be linked to stock price targets and a further 40 per cent to the deployment of computing capacity. The remaining 20 per cent relates to “other operational targets”.

The prospectus said: “Our compensation committee and board of directors believe that Mr Payne’s continued leadership is critical to our ability to successfully execute our long-term strategy, capitalise on emerging market opportunities and create substantial shareholder value.”

Payne’s compensation in 2025, including share awards, was £17.2m. That was just below the £17.7m paid to Pascal Soriot at AstraZeneca, the highest in the FTSE 100.

Payne was born and raised in New South Wales, on Australia’s east coast. He worked in a coal mine and as a manual labourer before setting up a bitcoin-focused company, Arkon Mining, in 2019. Nscale was spun out of that business, since renamed Arkon Energy, in 2024.

Revenue, losses and contracts

The company has grown on the back of contracts with US technology groups and backing from industry figures. It was valued at about $14.6bn in a funding round in March led by Aker, the Norwegian industrial investment company, and 8090 Industries, a US investment firm.

Nvidia also took part in that round. The chipmaker has invested more than $2bn in Nscale, including $1bn in convertible notes, and Jensen Huang, Nvidia’s chief executive, has described the company as a “national champion for the UK”. Nscale is a major customer of Nvidia and also has a $1.2bn contract to supply it with computing capacity.

The prospectus showed revenue of $140.6m in the six months to June, up from $10.4m a year earlier. Net losses widened over the same period from $368.9m to $1.02bn.

Nscale said it expects losses to continue because of the “substantial upfront capital expenditure” needed to expand its data centre capacity and buy the hardware required to deliver its contracts.

At the end of August, the company said it had 55 megawatts of active capacity: 7MW from its own data centres and 48MW rented from third parties. That capacity is tied to $2.6bn in contracted revenue. A further 1.3 gigawatts is in the pipeline, tied to $101bn of contracts that have not yet started. One megawatt can support about 600 to 1,000 homes.

Nscale has signed a six-year contract worth $45bn with Anthropic, under which the AI lab will lease capacity at Nscale’s site in West Virginia from next year. It has also signed long-term agreements with Microsoft running until 2033 and worth $44bn, building on an earlier arrangement to supply the Microsoft UK supercomputer project.

The company, which raised £750m last year for its UK data centre plans, claims to have “line of sight” to 10GW of capacity.

The prospectus also set out risks. It said: “Our limited operating history, including our limited history of selling our AI cloud infrastructure offering, the dynamic and rapidly evolving market in which we sell our platform, and the concentration of our revenue from a limited number of customers, as well as numerous other factors beyond our control, may make it difficult to evaluate our current business, future prospects and other trends.”

About the author

Jamie Young

Jamie Young is Senior Reporter at Business Matters, covering SME finance, employment law and Westminster policy since 2016. He has reported on every Budget and Autumn Statement since 2018, helped make sense of the ‘covid era’ and the bounce-back loan scheme from launch through the fraud investigations, and broke the magazine’s coverage of the 2024 late-payment reforms. He joined Business Matters straight from completing his BA in Administration from Exeter University and is NCTJ-qualified. Reach him at jyoung@cbmeg.co.uk

Advertisement

Social Security beneficiaries are expected to see a larger cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) in 2027 than they received for this year, according to new estimates that follow the release of August inflation data.

By law, the annual Social Security COLA is calculated using the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ consumer price index (CPI) inflation data for the months of July, August and September based on a variant of the dataset known as CPI-W. The COLA boosts beneficiaries’ payments to account for a rise in the cost of living, and the COLA for 2026 amounted to a 2.8% increase.

The BLS released the August CPI inflation data that showed consumer prices were up 3.4% from a year ago, while the CPI-W was up 3.5% over the last year.

Several groups have released estimates for the 2027 COLA based on the data from the last two months and estimates for September’s data, which have the COLA landing in a range from 3.4% to 3.6%.

CONSUMER PRICES REMAIN ELEVATED IN AUGUST AHEAD OF FED’S NEXT MEETING

Social Security’s annual COLA will be officially announced after the release of the September CPI inflation data next month. (Getty Images/stock)

The nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB) estimated that based on the latest data, the 2027 COLA will be 3.4%.

AARP projected that the 2027 COLA will be 3.6%, based on its analysis of recent inflation readings and projections for the coming weeks.

Rich Johnson, vice president of financial security at the AARP Public Policy Institute, noted that many older adults rely on Social Security for the bulk of their income and that the group’s forecast aims to help them plan based on how the COLA may affect their finances.

“Family budgets have been under increasing pressure because of rising prices. The sooner that we can give them reliable information as to how much their benefits might [increase next year], the sooner they can start planning,” Johnson said.

ONE TYPE OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADJUSTMENT COULD CUT THE 75-YEAR SHORTFALL IN HALF

Johnson said that the AARP’s estimate incorporates the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland’s inflation projections for September and that while those figures aren’t “set in stone,” the data helps compile the estimate.

“With only one month of inflation data to go until the 2027 COLA is finalized, there’s less uncertainty about what that increase will be,” he added. “Unless prices change dramatically in September, we’re confident that the COLA will be in the mid-3% range.”

The Senior Citizens League predicted the 2027 COLA will be 3.5% following the release of the August CPI inflation data, down slightly from its estimate of 3.6% the prior month. A 3.5% COLA would increase average benefit checks by $67.90 and would boost the monthly benefit from $1,940.08 to $2,007.98, TSCL reported.

AMERICA’S $40T NATIONAL DEBT IS ‘STEALING FROM OUR NEXT GENERATION,’ ECONOMIST WARNS

Social Security’s COLA is expected to be larger in 2027 than in 2026 due to higher inflation. (Mark Felix/The Washington Post)

“The biggest thing we’re watching with the COLA announcement coming are short-term shocks to the economy that push inflation way up or down in the next 30 days,” said TSCL executive director Shannon Benton.

“No matter if the COLA announcement comes in slightly higher or slightly lower than our prediction, seniors will probably end up disappointed in the long run. The reality is that older Americans allocate their budgets differently than people still in the workforce, so inflation hits them differently. The CPI-W captures the experience of urban wage earners, which doesn’t represent the average senior’s budget,” Benton added.

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

The final piece of data for the 2027 COLA will be released on Oct. 14, when the BLS releases the September CPI inflation data.